ML20070D126: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:e i | {{#Wiki_filter:e i | ||
UNITED STAd.S OF AMr.wa NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMIL8 ION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL B06RD | UNITED STAd.S OF AMr.wa NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMIL8 ION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL B06RD | ||
'82 CEC 13 A11:3J l | |||
In the Matter of THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY | |||
$N et No. 50-341 OL (Enrico Termi Atomic Power Plant Unit 2) | |||
/ | |||
AFFIDAVIT Kim Arthur Siegfried.first being duly sworn, deposes and saysl: | AFFIDAVIT Kim Arthur Siegfried.first being duly sworn, deposes and saysl: | ||
1. | |||
I have previously appeared in this case as counsel for intervenor Citizens for Employmant and Energy and acted in that capacity until 1979 when I was forced for personal reas ! | |||
ons to withdraw as counsel for CEE. | ons to withdraw as counsel for CEE. | ||
I | I 2. | ||
That at the request of myself and CEE, Mr. David f | |||
Howell entered an Appearance and substitution of counsel which was approved by the Licensing Board. | Howell entered an Appearance and substitution of counsel which was approved by the Licensing Board. | ||
l I | |||
3. | |||
That although I resigned as counsel for CEE, I remained ; | |||
, a member of CEE and attempted to assist Mr. Howell in his repre ' | |||
! aentation of CEE in this proceeding. On several occasions, due ! | |||
to conflicts in scheduling. I represented CEE in matters before the Licensi'ng Board until such time as Mr. Howell could appear. | to conflicts in scheduling. I represented CEE in matters before the Licensi'ng Board until such time as Mr. Howell could appear. | ||
4. | |||
That an appearance on behalf of CEE was never formally ertered by myself, and although this is not entirely clear on I | |||
the record, the representation of CEE was as a member of the j | |||
Howell were through myself and during those contacts I had au-thority to act on behalf of CEE | organization, not as "co-counsel". | ||
5. | |||
dacisions he felt appropriate with regard to his legal repre-sentation of the organization in th'is proceeding. | That most, but not all, of CEE's contacts with Mr. | ||
Howell were through myself and during those contacts I had au-thority to act on behalf of CEE. | |||
6. | |||
Although I do not recall a speciff c conversation with Mr. Howell concerning the filing of proposed findings of fact, Mr. Howell was given full authority by myself and CEE to make dacisions he felt appropriate with regard to his legal repre-sentation of the organization in th'is proceeding. | |||
And further this deponent says not., | And further this deponent says not., | ||
U p | U p | ||
Kim Arthur Siegfried STATE OF MICHIGAN) | Kim Arthur Siegfried STATE OF MICHIGAN) | ||
COUNTY OF OAKLAND) | $$O3 as COUNTY OF OAKLAND) | ||
S | S to an ed to before me this 8th day of December,1982. | ||
8 | |||
. Notary Public, Oakland County Sandra L. Howell My Co= mission Expires 7-16-86 l | |||
I l | I l | ||
t | t | ||
:}} | |||
Latest revision as of 09:55, 16 December 2024
| ML20070D126 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi |
| Issue date: | 12/08/1982 |
| From: | Siegfried K CITIZENS FOR ENERGY & EMPLOYMENT |
| To: | |
| References | |
| ISSUANCES-OL, NUDOCS 8212140460 | |
| Download: ML20070D126 (1) | |
Text
e i
UNITED STAd.S OF AMr.wa NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMIL8 ION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL B06RD
'82 CEC 13 A11:3J l
In the Matter of THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY
$N et No. 50-341 OL (Enrico Termi Atomic Power Plant Unit 2)
/
AFFIDAVIT Kim Arthur Siegfried.first being duly sworn, deposes and saysl:
1.
I have previously appeared in this case as counsel for intervenor Citizens for Employmant and Energy and acted in that capacity until 1979 when I was forced for personal reas !
ons to withdraw as counsel for CEE.
I 2.
That at the request of myself and CEE, Mr. David f
Howell entered an Appearance and substitution of counsel which was approved by the Licensing Board.
l I
3.
That although I resigned as counsel for CEE, I remained ;
, a member of CEE and attempted to assist Mr. Howell in his repre '
! aentation of CEE in this proceeding. On several occasions, due !
to conflicts in scheduling. I represented CEE in matters before the Licensi'ng Board until such time as Mr. Howell could appear.
4.
That an appearance on behalf of CEE was never formally ertered by myself, and although this is not entirely clear on I
the record, the representation of CEE was as a member of the j
organization, not as "co-counsel".
5.
That most, but not all, of CEE's contacts with Mr.
Howell were through myself and during those contacts I had au-thority to act on behalf of CEE.
6.
Although I do not recall a speciff c conversation with Mr. Howell concerning the filing of proposed findings of fact, Mr. Howell was given full authority by myself and CEE to make dacisions he felt appropriate with regard to his legal repre-sentation of the organization in th'is proceeding.
And further this deponent says not.,
U p
Kim Arthur Siegfried STATE OF MICHIGAN)
$$O3 as COUNTY OF OAKLAND)
S to an ed to before me this 8th day of December,1982.
8
. Notary Public, Oakland County Sandra L. Howell My Co= mission Expires 7-16-86 l
I l
t