ML20077F959: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:- _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _                           _ - - - -
{{#Wiki_filter:- _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _
            ,                                BOB SMITH                                                                                                                                                             ""*"'
BOB SMITH mi s w.s...
mi     s w.s...                                                                                                                                               ChMID $t Ht'iC15 IN NEW H AMP $Hi A[                                                                                                                                                           INvlRONMENT AND 1-800-922-2230                                                                                                                                                             PVI'Lic woNAs i                                                                                       ilnitcil Etatts Etnatt                                                                                       a=;g,~
ChMID $t Ht'iC15 IN NEW H AMP $Hi A[
c WASH NGTON.DC 20610-2903 May 14, 1991 The Honorable Kenneth M. Carr Chairman U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555
INvlRONMENT AND 1-800-922-2230 PVI'Lic woNAs i
ilnitcil Etatts Etnatt a=;g,~
c WASH NGTON.DC 20610-2903 May 14, 1991 The Honorable Kenneth M. Carr Chairman U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555


==Dear Mr. Chairman:==
==Dear Mr. Chairman:==
As you know, the Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant in New Hampshire received a full-power license from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in March 1990 after an extensive and protracted licensing process that spanned over seventeen years.
As you know, the Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant in New Hampshire received a full-power license from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in March 1990 after an extensive and protracted licensing process that spanned over seventeen years.
Today, the people of New Hampshire and New England are benefiting from the reliable electricity that the Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant produces.                         I am encouraged by the good track record that Seabrook has exhibited during its first year of operation, and I expect that the plant will continue on that track. Furthermore, I remain interested in assuring that Seabrook operates efficiently and economically and remains safe.
Today, the people of New Hampshire and New England are benefiting from the reliable electricity that the Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant produces.
I am encouraged by the good track record that Seabrook has exhibited during its first year of operation, and I expect that the plant will continue on that track.
Furthermore, I remain interested in assuring that Seabrook operates efficiently and economically and remains safe.
Dcspite the licensee's excellent record of plant operation and Seabrook's protracted licensing process, some Members of Congress and congressional staff continue to question the capacity of the licensee to operate Seabrook.
Dcspite the licensee's excellent record of plant operation and Seabrook's protracted licensing process, some Members of Congress and congressional staff continue to question the capacity of the licensee to operate Seabrook.
It is my understanding that many of these safety-related questions have already been answered adequately, and in accordance with the NRC's rigid standards.                                                           Could you please inform me of any outstanding questions related to plant safety that the NRC hac not ansvered to date? If any outstanding questions remain, I would like you to estimate how much longer an NRC review of these issues should last.
It is my understanding that many of these safety-related questions have already been answered adequately, and in accordance with the NRC's rigid standards.
In addition, I would appreciate it if the NRC would promptly provide to my office any and all future correspondence between the NRC, other Members of Congress, and the licensee involving the review of safety-related records at Seabrook. Please also keep me informed prior to any future meetings that the NRC may have with either the licensee or congressional _ staff on this matter.
Could you please inform me of any outstanding questions related to plant safety that the NRC hac not ansvered to date?
                                                                        -~~~-
If any outstanding questions remain, I would like you to estimate how much longer an NRC review of these issues should last.
                                                          ,s-                                 __
In addition, I would appreciate it if the NRC would promptly provide to my office any and all future correspondence between the NRC, other Members of Congress, and the licensee involving the review of safety-related records at Seabrook.
(O           f&                   ~
Please also keep me informed prior to any future meetings that the NRC may have with either the licensee or congressional _ staff on this matter.
p?o3                       y' Dossen Dsnerna                           ime Gaisant Duno =0         46 N Ma.m steset                       One Hansove Ptact                                           136 Ptessawt Steelt 59ne 332                                 to Panu**e Cois si         conton:.. NH 03 301                     Sons 435                                                   Dance NH 035 70 Wosa noton DC 2051CS 2903                 Mancassvia NH 0310t         t603p 2264>46 3                         Poavswovvn. NH 0300 t                                     16036752-2604 (202)224-2641                             !4031634-5000                                                       16031433 1467 PRINTID ON Rf CVCLID PAPER
-~~~-
,s-(O f&
~
p?o3 y'
Dossen Dsnerna ime Gaisant Duno =0 46 N Ma.m steset One Hansove Ptact 136 Ptessawt Steelt 59ne 332 to Panu**e Cois si conton:.. NH 03 301 Sons 435 Dance NH 035 70 Wosa noton DC 2051CS 2903 Mancassvia NH 0310t t603p 2264>46 3 Poavswovvn. NH 0300 t 16036752-2604 (202)224-2641
!4031634-5000 16031433 1467 PRINTID ON Rf CVCLID PAPER


h Pago 2 May 14, 1991 The lionorable Kenneth Carr Thank you in advance for your cooperation in meeting this request.
h Pago 2 May 14, 1991 The lionorable Kenneth Carr Thank you in advance for your cooperation in meeting this request.
Sincerely, i
Sincerely, i
                                                                                            /                           o Bob Smith, USS
/
                                                                                                                                                                              )
o Bob Smith, USS
l L.           -  . - - - . ,                      . , - . . - _ - . - _ . . . . . . , . .            .._. _          .,  .- . . , . - - ~         .        , _ . . . - - . .}}
)
L.
.-..,. - - ~
.}}

Latest revision as of 01:36, 15 December 2024

Requests to Be Inform of Any Outstanding Questions Re Plant Safety That NRC Has Not Answered to Date
ML20077F959
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/14/1991
From: Beverly Smith
SENATE
To: Carr K
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML19332K140 List:
References
NUDOCS 9106210090
Download: ML20077F959 (2)


Text

- _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _

BOB SMITH mi s w.s...

ChMID $t Ht'iC15 IN NEW H AMP $Hi A[

INvlRONMENT AND 1-800-922-2230 PVI'Lic woNAs i

ilnitcil Etatts Etnatt a=;g,~

c WASH NGTON.DC 20610-2903 May 14, 1991 The Honorable Kenneth M. Carr Chairman U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555

Dear Mr. Chairman:

As you know, the Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant in New Hampshire received a full-power license from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in March 1990 after an extensive and protracted licensing process that spanned over seventeen years.

Today, the people of New Hampshire and New England are benefiting from the reliable electricity that the Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant produces.

I am encouraged by the good track record that Seabrook has exhibited during its first year of operation, and I expect that the plant will continue on that track.

Furthermore, I remain interested in assuring that Seabrook operates efficiently and economically and remains safe.

Dcspite the licensee's excellent record of plant operation and Seabrook's protracted licensing process, some Members of Congress and congressional staff continue to question the capacity of the licensee to operate Seabrook.

It is my understanding that many of these safety-related questions have already been answered adequately, and in accordance with the NRC's rigid standards.

Could you please inform me of any outstanding questions related to plant safety that the NRC hac not ansvered to date?

If any outstanding questions remain, I would like you to estimate how much longer an NRC review of these issues should last.

In addition, I would appreciate it if the NRC would promptly provide to my office any and all future correspondence between the NRC, other Members of Congress, and the licensee involving the review of safety-related records at Seabrook.

Please also keep me informed prior to any future meetings that the NRC may have with either the licensee or congressional _ staff on this matter.

-~~~-

,s-(O f&

~

p?o3 y'

Dossen Dsnerna ime Gaisant Duno =0 46 N Ma.m steset One Hansove Ptact 136 Ptessawt Steelt 59ne 332 to Panu**e Cois si conton:.. NH 03 301 Sons 435 Dance NH 035 70 Wosa noton DC 2051CS 2903 Mancassvia NH 0310t t603p 2264>46 3 Poavswovvn. NH 0300 t 16036752-2604 (202)224-2641

!4031634-5000 16031433 1467 PRINTID ON Rf CVCLID PAPER

h Pago 2 May 14, 1991 The lionorable Kenneth Carr Thank you in advance for your cooperation in meeting this request.

Sincerely, i

/

o Bob Smith, USS

)

L.

.-..,. - - ~

.