ML20140F725: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot insert |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:J, | {{#Wiki_filter:Pec l | ||
J, I | |||
June 6, 1997 Patrick D. Milano, Acting Director Project Directorate 1-3 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 0-14 B 20 US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC | June 6, 1997 Patrick D. | ||
Milano, Acting Director Project Directorate 1-3 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 0-14 B 20 US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 | |||
==Dear Mr. Milano:== | ==Dear Mr. Milano:== | ||
Enclosed is the Seacoast Anti-Pollution League's comment on the proposed License Amendment to Seabrook Station, Unit No. | |||
Enclosed is the Seacoast Anti-Pollution League's comment on the proposed License Amendment to Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1, | 1, public notice of which was published on 6/4/97 in the legal notices section of the Portsmouth Herald. | ||
I telephoned 301-415-1457 by direct dialed call on this date and reached your voice mail and read SAPL's comment. | I telephoned 301-415-1457 by direct dialed call on this date and reached your voice mail and read SAPL's comment. | ||
When 1 later noted that the instructions said "by collect call", 1 tried twice to place a collect call to your number to resubmit our comment. Neither call was accepted. | When 1 later noted that the instructions said "by collect call", 1 tried twice to place a collect call to your number to resubmit our comment. | ||
Sincerely, C) = h % | Neither call was accepted. | ||
Enclosure | This raises a concern that other public comments may also have been attempted unsuccessfully. | ||
On this basis, SAPL would ask that the public comment period be extended. | |||
Sincerely, C) = h % | |||
Jane Doughty SAPL Staff l | |||
Enclosure Via Certified Mail 1 | |||
b | |||
[ | [ | ||
f t | f t | ||
t( | t( | ||
l | VMdtM, | ||
l l(ll(((ll((lll(ll(l((lli}(lo}{llil(ll.ll 9706130215 970606 PDR ADOCK 05000443 H | |||
PDR l | |||
l | |||
~ | |||
s. | s. | ||
l 1 | l 1 | ||
Legal Notices section of the Portsmouth Herald on 6/4/97) | SAPL'S COMMENT ON NRC'S PROPOSED LICENSE AMENDMENT (Public Notification of which was published in the Legal Notices section of the Portsmouth Herald on | ||
It is the Seacoast Anti-Pollution League's position that there is a significant hazards consideration.in the matter of the NRC staff # s proposed amendment to the operating license at the Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1, which would amend the Seabrook Technical Specifications to | ] | ||
explicitly identify the Westinghouse fuel assembly design at Seabrook consisting of either ZIRLO or Zircaloy-4 fuel cladding material. | 6/4/97) | ||
There is a significant hazards consideration in this | It is the Seacoast Anti-Pollution League's position that there is a significant hazards consideration.in the matter of the NRC staff # s proposed amendment to the operating license at the Seabrook Station, Unit No. | ||
matter because it has become clear that there is a problem | 1, which would amend the Seabrook Technical Specifications to explicitly identify the Westinghouse fuel assembly design at l | ||
Seabrook consisting of either ZIRLO or Zircaloy-4 fuel cladding material. | |||
This degradation of one of the principal safety barriers at | There is a significant hazards consideration in this matter because it has become clear that there is a problem with the Westinghouse fuel cladding in use at Seabrook Station. | ||
The licensee has identified leaking fuel rods; two of the ZIRLO clad rods broke during refueling operations according to an event report made to the NRC on S/31/97. | |||
identified and remedied, there is every reason to expect that this degradation will continue in future and a condition could eventuate which could lead to serious public safety consequences. | This degradation of one of the principal safety barriers at the plant is a very serious matter. | ||
plant is also degrading, is relevant to this matter. SAPL believes that the both the probability and consequences of previously evaluated accident scenarios are increased by l | If root causes are not I | ||
identified and remedied, there is every reason to expect that this degradation will continue in future and a condition could eventuate which could lead to serious public safety consequences. | |||
l | SAPL holds that the detection of a steam generator tube leak during the last operating cycle, which indicates that a second principal safety barrier at the l | ||
plant is also degrading, is relevant to this matter. | |||
SAPL believes that the both the probability and consequences of previously evaluated accident scenarios are increased by l | |||
plant operation with degradeo fuel cladding. | |||
It is clear l | |||
that plant workers are already being subj ec ted to more hazardous working conditions as a consequence of the degraded fuel cladding. | |||
Operation of Seabrook Station with defective fuel cladding significantly reduces the margins of public safety. | |||
l SAPL holds that a hearing should be held and a thorough investigation be made to determine the root causes of l | |||
existing fuel cladding degradation prior to any decisions I | |||
being made to issue this license amendment and prior to plant start-up. | being made to issue this license amendment and prior to plant start-up. | ||
Submitted on 6/6/97 by: | Submitted on 6/6/97 by: | ||
a O | a O | ||
O Jane Doughty SAPL Staff 4 | |||
4 | |||
.}} | .}} | ||
Latest revision as of 16:31, 11 December 2024
| ML20140F725 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook |
| Issue date: | 06/06/1997 |
| From: | Doughty J SEACOAST ANTI-POLLUTION LEAGUE |
| To: | Milano P NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9706130215 | |
| Download: ML20140F725 (2) | |
Text
Pec l
J, I
June 6, 1997 Patrick D.
Milano, Acting Director Project Directorate 1-3 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 0-14 B 20 US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555
Dear Mr. Milano:
Enclosed is the Seacoast Anti-Pollution League's comment on the proposed License Amendment to Seabrook Station, Unit No.
1, public notice of which was published on 6/4/97 in the legal notices section of the Portsmouth Herald.
I telephoned 301-415-1457 by direct dialed call on this date and reached your voice mail and read SAPL's comment.
When 1 later noted that the instructions said "by collect call", 1 tried twice to place a collect call to your number to resubmit our comment.
Neither call was accepted.
This raises a concern that other public comments may also have been attempted unsuccessfully.
On this basis, SAPL would ask that the public comment period be extended.
Sincerely, C) = h %
Jane Doughty SAPL Staff l
Enclosure Via Certified Mail 1
b
[
f t
t(
VMdtM,
l l(ll(((ll((lll(ll(l((lli}(lo}{llil(ll.ll 9706130215 970606 PDR ADOCK 05000443 H
PDR l
l
~
s.
l 1
SAPL'S COMMENT ON NRC'S PROPOSED LICENSE AMENDMENT (Public Notification of which was published in the Legal Notices section of the Portsmouth Herald on
]
6/4/97)
It is the Seacoast Anti-Pollution League's position that there is a significant hazards consideration.in the matter of the NRC staff # s proposed amendment to the operating license at the Seabrook Station, Unit No.
1, which would amend the Seabrook Technical Specifications to explicitly identify the Westinghouse fuel assembly design at l
Seabrook consisting of either ZIRLO or Zircaloy-4 fuel cladding material.
There is a significant hazards consideration in this matter because it has become clear that there is a problem with the Westinghouse fuel cladding in use at Seabrook Station.
The licensee has identified leaking fuel rods; two of the ZIRLO clad rods broke during refueling operations according to an event report made to the NRC on S/31/97.
This degradation of one of the principal safety barriers at the plant is a very serious matter.
If root causes are not I
identified and remedied, there is every reason to expect that this degradation will continue in future and a condition could eventuate which could lead to serious public safety consequences.
SAPL holds that the detection of a steam generator tube leak during the last operating cycle, which indicates that a second principal safety barrier at the l
plant is also degrading, is relevant to this matter.
SAPL believes that the both the probability and consequences of previously evaluated accident scenarios are increased by l
plant operation with degradeo fuel cladding.
It is clear l
that plant workers are already being subj ec ted to more hazardous working conditions as a consequence of the degraded fuel cladding.
Operation of Seabrook Station with defective fuel cladding significantly reduces the margins of public safety.
l SAPL holds that a hearing should be held and a thorough investigation be made to determine the root causes of l
existing fuel cladding degradation prior to any decisions I
being made to issue this license amendment and prior to plant start-up.
Submitted on 6/6/97 by:
a O
O Jane Doughty SAPL Staff 4
4
.