ML20149M735: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:- - - - - - - - - - . | {{#Wiki_filter:- - - - - - - - - -. | ||
E30 POSED RULE m anew D ALTIMORE | E30 POSED RULE m anew D ALTIMORE ki(W GAS AND ELECTRIC | ||
'E FB 22 41:02 CHARLES CENTER P. O. BOX 1475 BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21203 QUICL # it.u.'.. | |||
NvcktAA e=theY February 17, 1988 Secretary of the Commission U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 ATTENTION: | Josten A.TIERNAN u0CMEi.NG g dvu N A NL*' | ||
vice Pacsiot=t NvcktAA e=theY February 17, 1988 Secretary of the Commission U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 ATTENTION: | |||
Docketing and Service Branch | |||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
| Line 28: | Line 30: | ||
(a) Letter from Mr. J. F. Colvin (NUh1 ARC) to hir. S. J. Chilk (NRC), | (a) Letter from Mr. J. F. Colvin (NUh1 ARC) to hir. S. J. Chilk (NRC), | ||
dated January 25, 1988, same subject (b) Letter from hit. A. E. Lundvall, Jr. (BG&E) to Mr. H. L. Thompson (NRC), dated July 8,1985, Generic Letter 85-07, Implementation of Integrated Schedules for Plant Madifications Gentlemen: | dated January 25, 1988, same subject (b) Letter from hit. A. E. Lundvall, Jr. (BG&E) to Mr. H. L. Thompson (NRC), dated July 8,1985, Generic Letter 85-07, Implementation of Integrated Schedules for Plant Madifications Gentlemen: | ||
Baltimore Gas and Electric is pleased to have the opportunity to comment on the proposed | Baltimore Gas and Electric is pleased to have the opportunity to comment on the proposed Policy Statement on Integrated Schedules for Implementation of Plant Modifications. We have reviewed the proposed policy statement and have participated in the formulation of the NUMARC comments (Reference a). We would like to take this opportunity to endorse the NUMARC comments as representing our position on this issue with the following clarifications. | ||
We have chosen not to submit our scheduling process for review by the NRC for the reasons outlined in our response to Generic Letter 85-07 (Reference b). We feel strongly that the utility management should retain control over the scheduling process. | We have chosen not to submit our scheduling process for review by the NRC for the reasons outlined in our response to Generic Letter 85-07 (Reference b). We feel strongly that the utility management should retain control over the scheduling process. | ||
Additionally, the policy statement should clearly state that penalties, either implicit or explicit, will not be applied to utilities who fall into categories 2 and 3. This will emphasize the voluntary nature of this program and allow utilities to choose a course of action based on the merits of the progr.am, without duress. | Additionally, the policy statement should clearly state that penalties, either implicit or explicit, will not be applied to utilities who fall into categories 2 and 3. This will emphasize the voluntary nature of this program and allow utilities to choose a course of action based on the merits of the progr.am, without duress. | ||
We understand that comments were due to the Commission by January 25, 1988. We apologize for this late endorsement and hope that you will consider it prior to any | We understand that comments were due to the Commission by January 25, 1988. We apologize for this late endorsement and hope that you will consider it prior to any | ||
\\% | |||
j[g(/C ,M/[ / | further action concerning this policy statement. | ||
ego 2ayco27 08o2 7 | d /d ' g, d j[g(/C,M/[ / | ||
PDR | FEB 2 91983 ego 2ayco27 08o2 7 | ||
.neticosec oy caro..... | |||
PDR PR 50 52FR45344 PDR c | |||
:r 4 | :r 4 | ||
a Secretary of the Commission February 17, 1988 t | |||
Page 2 Should you have any questions regarding this matter, we will be pleased to discuss them with you. | Page 2 Should you have any questions regarding this matter, we will be pleased to discuss them with you. | ||
Very truly yours, an+as-JAT/ PSF / dim cc: | Very truly yours, an+as-JAT/ PSF / dim cc: | ||
D. A. Brune, Esquire J. E. Silberg, Esquire R. A.Capra,NRC S. A.McNeil,NRC W. T. Russell, NRC D. C.Trimble, NRC | |||
'J d | 'J d | ||
{ | { | ||
. -.}} | |||
Latest revision as of 08:31, 11 December 2024
| ML20149M735 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Calvert Cliffs  |
| Issue date: | 02/17/1988 |
| From: | Tiernan J BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| References | |
| FRN-52FR45344, RULE-PR-50 52FR45344-00017, 52FR45344-17, GL-85-07, GL-85-7, NUDOCS 8802290027 | |
| Download: ML20149M735 (2) | |
Text
- - - - - - - - - -.
E30 POSED RULE m anew D ALTIMORE ki(W GAS AND ELECTRIC
'E FB 22 41:02 CHARLES CENTER P. O. BOX 1475 BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21203 QUICL # it.u.'..
Josten A.TIERNAN u0CMEi.NG g dvu N A NL*'
vice Pacsiot=t NvcktAA e=theY February 17, 1988 Secretary of the Commission U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 ATTENTION:
Docketing and Service Branch
SUBJECT:
Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Unit Nos.1 & 2; Docket Nos. 50-317 & 50-318 Proposed Policy Statement on Integrated Schedules for Implementation of Plant hiodifications
REFERENCE:
(a) Letter from Mr. J. F. Colvin (NUh1 ARC) to hir. S. J. Chilk (NRC),
dated January 25, 1988, same subject (b) Letter from hit. A. E. Lundvall, Jr. (BG&E) to Mr. H. L. Thompson (NRC), dated July 8,1985, Generic Letter 85-07, Implementation of Integrated Schedules for Plant Madifications Gentlemen:
Baltimore Gas and Electric is pleased to have the opportunity to comment on the proposed Policy Statement on Integrated Schedules for Implementation of Plant Modifications. We have reviewed the proposed policy statement and have participated in the formulation of the NUMARC comments (Reference a). We would like to take this opportunity to endorse the NUMARC comments as representing our position on this issue with the following clarifications.
We have chosen not to submit our scheduling process for review by the NRC for the reasons outlined in our response to Generic Letter 85-07 (Reference b). We feel strongly that the utility management should retain control over the scheduling process.
Additionally, the policy statement should clearly state that penalties, either implicit or explicit, will not be applied to utilities who fall into categories 2 and 3. This will emphasize the voluntary nature of this program and allow utilities to choose a course of action based on the merits of the progr.am, without duress.
We understand that comments were due to the Commission by January 25, 1988. We apologize for this late endorsement and hope that you will consider it prior to any
\\%
further action concerning this policy statement.
d /d ' g, d j[g(/C,M/[ /
FEB 2 91983 ego 2ayco27 08o2 7
.neticosec oy caro.....
- r 4
a Secretary of the Commission February 17, 1988 t
Page 2 Should you have any questions regarding this matter, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.
Very truly yours, an+as-JAT/ PSF / dim cc:
D. A. Brune, Esquire J. E. Silberg, Esquire R. A.Capra,NRC S. A.McNeil,NRC W. T. Russell, NRC D. C.Trimble, NRC
'J d
{
. -.