ML20195H902

Denies 881112 Request for Commission to Extend Public Comment Period on Proposed Fitness for Duty Program

ML20195H902
Person / Time
Issue date:	11/28/1988
From:	Grimes B Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Davison D AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
References
FRN-53FR36795, RULE-PR-26 NUDOCS 8812010107
Download: ML20195H902 (1)

Text

_ _ _ _ _ _

NOV 2 81983 9

David Davison 1052 Calledel Cerro Apartment 711 San Clemente, California 92672

Dear Mr. Davison:

This is in response to your request of November 12, 1988, for the Commission to extend the public coment period on the proposed fitness-for. duty rule.

As further discussed below, the Comission has provided ample opportunity for public awareness of and participation in this rulemaking process. Accordingly, your request'must be denied.

Coments on the proposed rule should be submitted by November 21, 1988.

Nevertheless, comments received after that date will also be considered if it is practical to do so. However, we cannot assure full consideration except as to conenents received by November 21, 1988.

The Comission indicated it was considering this rulemaking and discussed the general contents of the proposed rule during a public meeting)on December 1, 1987.

The contents of the proposed rule (SECY 88-129 were dis.

cussed in detail during a public meeting on June 21, 1988. The Comissinn held still another public meeting in Rockville, Maryland on October 17, 1988, to further public understanding of the issues and to facilitate the public coment process.

We appreciate your interest in this rulemaking and will give your written coments careful consideration when they are received. We will inform you if there is any change in comment period associated with this rulemaking.

Sincerely.

OtJrl::a151 neJ by traa it. crimes Brian X. Grimes, Director Division of Reactor Inspection and Safeguards Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

} lQ' [.

_0_!STRIBUTION POR LLBush Central Files' RFonner

'()

'DR15 R/F Abates t

R5GB R/F FMiraglia

/

BKGrimes DCrutchfield RAErickson WKennedy

• SEE PREY:005 CONCURRENCES FROM LETTER DATED NOVEMBER 16, 1988

/

J

'FC

R5GB:DRIS:hRR

R5GB:0R15:NRR :0GC

5ECY

D-

~

1AME :LLBush:mkm

RAErickson*

RFonner*

Abates

• I s

......

.........((/g...:..............:..............:............

JATE :11/16/88

11/16/88

11/16/88

11/16/88

11/2 //88

[0bk Nb

Nov 1 e ten Juan A. Cintron, Jr.

Nuclear Instrument Technician San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station P. O. Box 128. B-67 San Clemente California 92677

Dear Mr. Cintron:

This is in response to your request of November 8,1988, for the Comission to extend the public coment period on the proposed fitness.for. duty rule.

As further discussed below, the Comission has provided ample opportunity for public awareness of and participation in this rulemaking process. Accordingly, your request must be denied.

Coments on the proposed rule should be submitted by November 21, 1988, hevertheless, coments received after that date will also be considered if it is practical to do so. However, we cannot assure full consideration cxcept as to ccments received by hovember 21, 1986.

The Comission indicated it was considering this rulemaking and discussed the general contents of the proposed rule during a public meeting)on December 1, 1987.

Tne contents of the proposed rule (SECY 88 129 were dis.

cussed in detail ciuring a public meeting on June 21, 1988. The Comission held still another public meeting in Rockville, Maryland on October 17, 1968, to further public understanding of the issues and to facilitate the public coment process.

Ve appreciate your interest in this rulemaking and will give your written coments careful consideration when they are received. We will infom you if there is any change in comment period tssociated with this rulemaking.

Sincerely, Driginal signed by Brian K. Gnmes Brian K. Grimes, Director Division of Reactor Inspection and Safeguards Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation DISTRIBUTION PDR r LLBush Central files RFonner DRIS R/F Abates R5GE R/F FMiraglia BKGrires DCrutchfield RAErickson WKennedy

'5EE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE

.......:.. g g t/..:51 ~

D:DTtl5:N

R5GB:0F 5:hRR

R5GB: R 5:hRR :0GC 2...:.......

L..............

!E LLBus4:rkm*

AAEr on

R Nhfer

.B es

BKGrime rE

11/16/88

ll/l/88

.11/ lb'88

11//6/88

11/l,/88 ur 66PMI 0C Ib I[-

OOCXET 1:UM3ER q N -=

PROPO3EDRUt.1 1 Q );;n Q & 7 y @ /

"..,;.. (

November 12, 1988

.g gj j7 All $9 Secretary of the Commission M' t id ' y 4I-00Cf.i U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

" " ~

Washington D.C.

20555 Attn. Docketing and Services Branch

Dear Sirs:

I respectfully request an extension of 90 additional dayo in order to submit public comment with regard to the notice puMished in the Federal Register on September 22, 1988, Vol.

53, Number 184, dealing with the fitness for duty issue for nuclear power plant workers.

I feel that the time allotted by the Commission is not sufficient for gathering public comment in which to adequately address the issue.

Re:.p[ectf ully N

~

b. b ao(sco NPEc l

i San Onofre Nuclear Generatin! Station P.O. Box 128 /

San Clemente, Ca 92077 E%!

O'b 5&

t' N w

.%. / n c *lc A.' p A.43- %.bc,& Q U.llQ A,e.

am k

msa.cre AAce.w

..a

% de.mecfe,c.K g u

)-

Tu y;z..y.

m

~-

~