ML20212E919: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:. - | ||
q | q | ||
%< w. | |||
- 1 rion,.so a.. | |||
m., | m., | ||
OCT 2 4 997 Louis F. Stor | OCT 2 4 997 Louis F. Stor Pute fewce tkohc and Gas Co@any PD lbx 2364 Hancocks Bodge, f 0 08%8 009 3W5MO wo w. e, m. m ow.w. | ||
LR-N97658 | LR-N97658 q | ||
\\ | |||
Uniteo States Nuclear Regulatory Commiss. ion | Uniteo States Nuclear Regulatory Commiss. ion l | ||
Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 CLARIFICATION TO HOPE CREE't | |||
License Change Request (LCR) 92-10 for the Hope Creek Generating Station dated February 2, 1993, and a revision dated November 16, 1993.- As described below, th6de inconsistencies concern the use | ' TECHNIC % SPECIFICATION AMENDMENT NO. 63 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION FACILITY OLERATING LICENSE NPF-57 DOCKET NO. 50-354 Gentlemen: | ||
In PSE&G's LCR 92-10 applications, Attachment 1, Proposed Changes To the Technical Specifications, Section I.D, states, "50% value | i The purpose of this letter 's to clarify wording incccsistencies identified.in Public Service Electric and Gas Company's (PSE&G's) | ||
for recirculation flow," while Section III.B states, "50% core finw" for dianussions relating to thermal stratification. The words " recirculation flow" are more specific and correct while | License Change Request (LCR) 92-10 for the Hope Creek Generating Station dated February 2, 1993, and a revision dated November 16, 1993.- As described below, th6de inconsistencies concern the use i | ||
use of the term " core flow" is not. Similarly, the NRC's Saf ety | of "recirculetion flow" and " core flow" when discussing thermal i | ||
stratification in single loop operation. -Although these inconsistencies were also identified in the NRC's resultant Safety Evaluation for Amendment No. 63 of Hope Cruk Technical Specifications, the actual Technical Specificatio' changes utilized the proper wording. | |||
In PSE&G's LCR 92-10 applications, Attachment 1, Proposed Changes To the Technical Specifications, Section I.D, states, "50% value for recirculation flow," while Section III.B states, "50% core finw" for dianussions relating to thermal stratification. | |||
The words " recirculation flow" are more specific and correct while use of the term " core flow" is not. | |||
Similarly, the NRC's Saf ety | |||
-Evaluation _for Amendment 63, Section 2.2.b, states, "50 percent | |||
: j. ) | : j. ) | ||
of rated core flow," but in section 2.4~.c states, " recirculation | |||
/ | |||
PSE&G believes that the above inconsistencies: | i flow remains at 50 percent." | ||
Consideration-analysis submitted for LCR 92-10; 2) nor change the k | Technical' Specification Action 3.4.1.1.a.1.g and Surveillance 4.4.1.1.2 both state | ||
P | " recirculation loop flow in the operating recirculation loop is 5 50% of rated loop flow'." | ||
The-Technical Specifications, as written, utilizes.the proper wording. | |||
PSE&G believes that the above inconsistencies: | |||
: 1) do not altor the conclusions reached in-the No significant Hazards Consideration-analysis submitted for LCR 92-10; 2) nor change the 4 | |||
k PN4 P | |||
,baGGbd | |||
. MMMM]Efil 3 | |||
V axyo d rap," | |||
^~ | |||
,<c, | |||
.ww-- | |||
ow. | |||
y- | |||
-,v--- | |||
c 4 | |||
Document Control Desk OCT 2 41997 LR-N97650 intent of the NRC's approval af Amendment No. 63 to the Technical Specifications ac described in the Safety Evaluation. | |||
transmitting this letter to provide a more clearly defined and consistent basis for the justification of the changes contained in Amendment No. 63. Since the current Technical Specifications are correct, they will continue to provide appropriate control for Hope Creek operations. PSE&G does not believe that an NRC revision to Technical Specification Amendment No. 63 is required as a result of this issue. | PSE&G is transmitting this letter to provide a more clearly defined and consistent basis for the justification of the changes contained in Amendment No. 63. | ||
Should you have any questions regardir. this transmittal, we will be pleased to discuss them with you. | Since the current Technical Specifications are correct, they will continue to provide appropriate control for Hope Creek operations. | ||
Sincerely, | PSE&G does not believe that an NRC revision to Technical Specification Amendment No. 63 is required as a result of this issue. | ||
Should you have any questions regardir. | |||
this transmittal, we will be pleased to discuss them with you. | |||
Sincerely, Yr Y/ | |||
-)(Cccm | |||
USNRC Senior Resident Inspector - HC Mr. K. Tosch, Manager IV Bureau of Nuclear Engineering 33 Arctic Parkway CN 415 Trenton, NJ | /~ O | ||
/ | |||
Affidavic C | |||
Mr. H. Miller, Administrator - Region I U | |||
S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Mr. D. Jaffe, Licensing Project Manager - HC U. | |||
S. | |||
Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Mail Stop 14E21 Rockville, MD 20852 Mr. S. Morril (X24) | |||
USNRC Senior Resident Inspector - HC Mr. K. Tosch, Manager IV Bureau of Nuclear Engineering 33 Arctic Parkway CN 415 Trenton, NJ 08625 95-4933 | |||
i OCT 2 4 897 | |||
. Document Control Desk, | |||
LR-N97658 JPP BC | LR-N97658 JPP BC Stinior Vice President - Nuclear Engineering (N19) | ||
General Manager - Hope Creek Operations (HO*l) | General Manager - Hope Creek Operations (HO*l) | ||
Director - OA/NSR (X01) | Director - OA/NSR (X01) | ||
Director - Licensing & Regulation / Fuels (N21) | Director - Licensing & Regulation / Fuels (N21) | ||
Manager - Business Planning & Co-Owner Affairs (N10) | Manager - Business Planning & Co-Owner Affairs (N10) | ||
Manager - Hope Creek Operations (H01) | |||
Manager - Nuclear Review Board (N30) | Manager - Nuclear Review Board (N30) | ||
-Manager - Hope Crock L.consing (N21) | |||
J. J. Keenan, Esq. (N21) | J. | ||
J. Keenan, Esq. (N21) | |||
Records Management (N21) | Records Management (N21) | ||
Microfilm Copy Files Nos. 1.2.1 (; Hope Creek), 2.2.2 (HC AMEN No. 63) a | Microfilm Copy Files Nos. 1.2.1 (; Hope Creek), 2.2.2 (HC AMEN No. 63) a | ||
- - - ~ | |||
REF: LR-N97658 STATE OF NEW JERSEY ) | REF: LR-N97658 STATE OF NEW JERSEY ) | ||
) | |||
COUNTY OF SALEM | SS. | ||
L. F. Storz, being duly sworn according to law deposes and says: | COUNTY OF SALEM | ||
) | |||
L. | |||
F. Storz, being duly sworn according to law deposes and says: | |||
I am Senior Vice President - Nuclear Operations of Public Service Electric and Gas Company, and as such, I find the matters set forth in the above referenced letter, concerning ? lope Creek Generating Station, Unit 1, are true to the best of my knowledge, information and belief. | I am Senior Vice President - Nuclear Operations of Public Service Electric and Gas Company, and as such, I find the matters set forth in the above referenced letter, concerning ? lope Creek Generating Station, Unit 1, are true to the best of my knowledge, information and belief. | ||
3 Edis | 3 Edis Subsc}r.e Il day o' AfDD/L,1997 and Swor t9 gefore me trais A f}3bbtLJ T$; | ||
Notary Public 6f 1[gw Defsey | l&LA% | ||
Notary Public 6f 1[gw Defsey KIMDIRlY JO DROWil NOTAnf I'llnllC Of NtW JERSty My Commission expires on u con,n,,,,,n i, p,,,,,,,, m gp, r | |||
e}} | |||
Latest revision as of 06:23, 4 December 2024
| ML20212E919 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hope Creek |
| Issue date: | 10/24/1997 |
| From: | Storz L Public Service Enterprise Group |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| LR-N97658, NUDOCS 9711040101 | |
| Download: ML20212E919 (4) | |
Text
. -
q
%< w.
- 1 rion,.so a..
m.,
OCT 2 4 997 Louis F. Stor Pute fewce tkohc and Gas Co@any PD lbx 2364 Hancocks Bodge, f 0 08%8 009 3W5MO wo w. e, m. m ow.w.
LR-N97658 q
\\
Uniteo States Nuclear Regulatory Commiss. ion l
Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 CLARIFICATION TO HOPE CREE't
' TECHNIC % SPECIFICATION AMENDMENT NO. 63 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION FACILITY OLERATING LICENSE NPF-57 DOCKET NO. 50-354 Gentlemen:
i The purpose of this letter 's to clarify wording incccsistencies identified.in Public Service Electric and Gas Company's (PSE&G's)
License Change Request (LCR) 92-10 for the Hope Creek Generating Station dated February 2, 1993, and a revision dated November 16, 1993.- As described below, th6de inconsistencies concern the use i
of "recirculetion flow" and " core flow" when discussing thermal i
stratification in single loop operation. -Although these inconsistencies were also identified in the NRC's resultant Safety Evaluation for Amendment No. 63 of Hope Cruk Technical Specifications, the actual Technical Specificatio' changes utilized the proper wording.
In PSE&G's LCR 92-10 applications, Attachment 1, Proposed Changes To the Technical Specifications,Section I.D, states, "50% value for recirculation flow," while Section III.B states, "50% core finw" for dianussions relating to thermal stratification.
The words " recirculation flow" are more specific and correct while use of the term " core flow" is not.
Similarly, the NRC's Saf ety
-Evaluation _for Amendment 63, Section 2.2.b, states, "50 percent
- j. )
of rated core flow," but in section 2.4~.c states, " recirculation
/
i flow remains at 50 percent."
Technical' Specification Action 3.4.1.1.a.1.g and Surveillance 4.4.1.1.2 both state
" recirculation loop flow in the operating recirculation loop is 5 50% of rated loop flow'."
The-Technical Specifications, as written, utilizes.the proper wording.
PSE&G believes that the above inconsistencies:
- 1) do not altor the conclusions reached in-the No significant Hazards Consideration-analysis submitted for LCR 92-10; 2) nor change the 4
k PN4 P
,baGGbd
. MMMM]Efil 3
V axyo d rap,"
^~
,<c,
.ww--
ow.
y-
-,v---
c 4
Document Control Desk OCT 2 41997 LR-N97650 intent of the NRC's approval af Amendment No. 63 to the Technical Specifications ac described in the Safety Evaluation.
PSE&G is transmitting this letter to provide a more clearly defined and consistent basis for the justification of the changes contained in Amendment No. 63.
Since the current Technical Specifications are correct, they will continue to provide appropriate control for Hope Creek operations.
PSE&G does not believe that an NRC revision to Technical Specification Amendment No. 63 is required as a result of this issue.
Should you have any questions regardir.
this transmittal, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.
Sincerely, Yr Y/
-)(Cccm
/~ O
/
Affidavic C
Mr. H. Miller, Administrator - Region I U
S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Mr. D. Jaffe, Licensing Project Manager - HC U.
S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Mail Stop 14E21 Rockville, MD 20852 Mr. S. Morril (X24)
USNRC Senior Resident Inspector - HC Mr. K. Tosch, Manager IV Bureau of Nuclear Engineering 33 Arctic Parkway CN 415 Trenton, NJ 08625 95-4933
i OCT 2 4 897
. Document Control Desk,
LR-N97658 JPP BC Stinior Vice President - Nuclear Engineering (N19)
General Manager - Hope Creek Operations (HO*l)
Director - OA/NSR (X01)
Director - Licensing & Regulation / Fuels (N21)
Manager - Business Planning & Co-Owner Affairs (N10)
Manager - Hope Creek Operations (H01)
Manager - Nuclear Review Board (N30)
-Manager - Hope Crock L.consing (N21)
J.
J. Keenan, Esq. (N21)
Records Management (N21)
Microfilm Copy Files Nos. 1.2.1 (; Hope Creek), 2.2.2 (HC AMEN No. 63) a
- - - ~
REF: LR-N97658 STATE OF NEW JERSEY )
)
SS.
COUNTY OF SALEM
)
L.
F. Storz, being duly sworn according to law deposes and says:
I am Senior Vice President - Nuclear Operations of Public Service Electric and Gas Company, and as such, I find the matters set forth in the above referenced letter, concerning ? lope Creek Generating Station, Unit 1, are true to the best of my knowledge, information and belief.
3 Edis Subsc}r.e Il day o' AfDD/L,1997 and Swor t9 gefore me trais A f}3bbtLJ T$;
l&LA%
Notary Public 6f 1[gw Defsey KIMDIRlY JO DROWil NOTAnf I'llnllC Of NtW JERSty My Commission expires on u con,n,,,,,n i, p,,,,,,,, m gp, r
e