ML20212P505: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:is                                 i==
{{#Wiki_filter:is i==
\~                           gggggD DUi           'II,     6     -
\\~
gggggD DUi
'II, 6
[7590-01]
[7590-01]
t                               (seFA Jn u)                                               bOL DOCKETEf-usm<c
t (seFA Jn u) bOL DOCKETEf-usm<c
                                                                      '86 AUG 27 P3 :34 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION PARTS 19, 20, 30, 31, 32, 34, 40, 50, 6 @ k ., G %fy BRANCH STANDARDS FOR PROTECTION AGAINST RADIATION; EXTENSION OF COMMENT PERIOD AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Comission.
'86 AUG 27 P3 :34 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION PARTS 19, 20, 30, 31, 32, 34, 40, 50, 6 @ k., G %fy BRANCH STANDARDS FOR PROTECTION AGAINST RADIATION; EXTENSION OF COMMENT PERIOD AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Comission.
ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of coment period.                                     ,
ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of coment period.


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
: On January 9,1986, the Nuclear Regulatory Comission published for public coment a proposed revision of its radiation protection standards,10 CFR Part 20. This Notice extends the coment period from September 12, 1986 to October 31, 1986 in order to be coincident with the coment period for the draft backfit analysis for this proposed rulemaking that is being published elsewhere in this issue.
: On January 9,1986, the Nuclear Regulatory Comission published for public coment a proposed revision of its radiation protection standards,10 CFR Part 20. This Notice extends the coment period from September 12, 1986 to October 31, 1986 in order to be coincident with the coment period for the draft backfit analysis for this proposed rulemaking that is being published elsewhere in this issue.
J DATE: Coments on the proposed revision must be submitted in writing on or before October 31, 1986. Coments received after this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but assurance of this consideration cannot be given except as to coments filed on or before this date. The coment period on the proposed backfit analysis for this rule also ends on this date. -
J DATE: Coments on the proposed revision must be submitted in writing on or before October 31, 1986. Coments received after this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but assurance of this consideration cannot be given except as to coments filed on or before this date. The coment period on the proposed backfit analysis for this rule also ends on this date. -
ADDRESSES: Submit written coments or any other information concerning this matter to the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission, Washington, D.C. 20555, Attention: Docketing and Service Branch. Copies of the proposed revision of 10 CFR Part 20 and the accompanying regulatory analysis that support this backfit analysis may be examined and copied for a fee at the Comission's Public Document Room,1717 H Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. Single copies of these documents may be obtained from the person indicated under the "FOR FURTHER INFORMATION C0flTACT" heading.
ADDRESSES: Submit written coments or any other information concerning this matter to the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission, Washington, D.C.
DS10                               860903o160 e60326 add:                               PR           92   PDR J. Becker, 9604 MNBB                         1 t O x -
20555, Attention: Docketing and Service Branch. Copies of the proposed revision of 10 CFR Part 20 and the accompanying regulatory analysis that support this backfit analysis may be examined and copied for a fee at the Comission's Public Document Room,1717 H Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.
Single copies of these documents may be obtained from the person indicated under the "FOR FURTHER INFORMATION C0flTACT" heading.
DS10 860903o160 e60326 add:
PR 92 PDR 1
J. Becker, 9604 MNBB t O x -


  ' [5
' [5
    ,                                                                                  [7590-01]
[7590-01]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert E. Alexander, Division of Regulatory               :
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert E. Alexander, Division of Regulatory Applications, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, U.S. NJclear Regulatory Comission, Washington, D.C.
l Applications, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, U.S. NJclear Regulatory Comission, Washington, D.C. 20555, telephone (301) 443-7976.
20555, telephone (301) 443-7976.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Nuclear Regulatory Comission is proposing to revise its regulations pertaining to radiation protection standards. The               ,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Nuclear Regulatory Comission is proposing to revise its regulations pertaining to radiation protection standards. The proposed revision was published in the Federal Register on January 9,1986(51 FR 1092).
proposed revision was published in the Federal Register on January 9,1986(51 FR 1092). In that document (51 FR 1122), the Comission indicated that it was publishing the proposed Part 20 revision without waiting for the preparation of a backfit analysis in accordance with 950.109 of 10 CFR Part 50. The Comission noted that such an analysis could be prepared and, if necessary, public coment on the backfit analysis could be obtained at a later date. A                 ,
In that document (51 FR 1122), the Comission indicated that it was publishing the proposed Part 20 revision without waiting for the preparation of a backfit analysis in accordance with 950.109 of 10 CFR Part 50. The Comission noted that such an analysis could be prepared and, if necessary, public coment on the backfit analysis could be obtained at a later date. A draft backfit analysis is published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register. The change in the coment period on the proposed Part 20 revision, extending it to October 31, 1986, is coincident with the coment period on the draft backfit analysis and will provide at least 60 days of concurrent coment period for both documents.
draft backfit analysis is published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal               -
Dated Washington, D.C. this day of 9%I
Register. The change in the coment period on the proposed Part 20 revision, extending it to October 31, 1986, is coincident with the coment period on the draft backfit analysis and will provide at least 60 days of concurrent coment period for both documents.
, 1986.
Dated Washington, D.C. this     %      day of     9%I                   , 1986.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Comissjpn.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Comissjpn.
                                                    <      . 1       -
1 0 0. A, f5uel J. Chilk, Secretary of the omission.
0 0. A, f5uel J. Chilk,                         '
Secretary of the omission.
9 G
9 G
2 l
2 l
t 1       -         - - - - --                                              _ _ _____}}
t 1
- - - - --}}

Latest revision as of 04:29, 4 December 2024

Notice of Extension of Comment Period for Proposed Rules 10CFR19,20,30,31,32,34,40,50,61 & 70 from 860912 to 861031 in Order to Be Coincident W/Comment Period for Draft Backfit Analysis
ML20212P505
Person / Time
Issue date: 08/26/1986
From: Chilk S
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
To:
References
FRN-50FR51992, RULE-PR-19, RULE-PR-20, RULE-PR-30, RULE-PR-31, RULE-PR-32, RULE-PR-34, RULE-PR-40, RULE-PR-50, RULE-PR-61, RULE-PR-70 NUDOCS 8609030160
Download: ML20212P505 (2)


Text

is i==

\\~

gggggD DUi

'II, 6

[7590-01]

t (seFA Jn u) bOL DOCKETEf-usm<c

'86 AUG 27 P3 :34 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION PARTS 19, 20, 30, 31, 32, 34, 40, 50, 6 @ k., G %fy BRANCH STANDARDS FOR PROTECTION AGAINST RADIATION; EXTENSION OF COMMENT PERIOD AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Comission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of coment period.

SUMMARY

On January 9,1986, the Nuclear Regulatory Comission published for public coment a proposed revision of its radiation protection standards,10 CFR Part 20. This Notice extends the coment period from September 12, 1986 to October 31, 1986 in order to be coincident with the coment period for the draft backfit analysis for this proposed rulemaking that is being published elsewhere in this issue.

J DATE: Coments on the proposed revision must be submitted in writing on or before October 31, 1986. Coments received after this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but assurance of this consideration cannot be given except as to coments filed on or before this date. The coment period on the proposed backfit analysis for this rule also ends on this date. -

ADDRESSES: Submit written coments or any other information concerning this matter to the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission, Washington, D.C.

20555, Attention: Docketing and Service Branch. Copies of the proposed revision of 10 CFR Part 20 and the accompanying regulatory analysis that support this backfit analysis may be examined and copied for a fee at the Comission's Public Document Room,1717 H Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

Single copies of these documents may be obtained from the person indicated under the "FOR FURTHER INFORMATION C0flTACT" heading.

DS10 860903o160 e60326 add:

PR 92 PDR 1

J. Becker, 9604 MNBB t O x -

' [5

[7590-01]

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert E. Alexander, Division of Regulatory Applications, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, U.S. NJclear Regulatory Comission, Washington, D.C.

20555, telephone (301) 443-7976.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Nuclear Regulatory Comission is proposing to revise its regulations pertaining to radiation protection standards. The proposed revision was published in the Federal Register on January 9,1986(51 FR 1092).

In that document (51 FR 1122), the Comission indicated that it was publishing the proposed Part 20 revision without waiting for the preparation of a backfit analysis in accordance with 950.109 of 10 CFR Part 50. The Comission noted that such an analysis could be prepared and, if necessary, public coment on the backfit analysis could be obtained at a later date. A draft backfit analysis is published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register. The change in the coment period on the proposed Part 20 revision, extending it to October 31, 1986, is coincident with the coment period on the draft backfit analysis and will provide at least 60 days of concurrent coment period for both documents.

Dated Washington, D.C. this day of 9%I

, 1986.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Comissjpn.

1 0 0. A, f5uel J. Chilk, Secretary of the omission.

9 G

2 l

t 1

- - - - --