ML20214G537: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot insert |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:n | {{#Wiki_filter:n C A S E== | ||
C A S E == | 21h/946-9hh6 (CITIZENS ASSN FOR SOUND ENERGY) 1vlif | ||
(CITIZENS ASSN FOR SOUND ENERGY) | ~ | ||
November 21, 1986 R. K. Gad III, Esq. | |||
NW 25 P4 :42 Ropes & Gray 225 Franklin Street Off!R Boston, Massachusetts 02110 OD | |||
~! | |||
==Dear Bob:== | ==Dear Bob:== | ||
a | a | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
Application for an Operating License Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-445 and 50-446 OL - | Application for an Operating License Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-445 and 50-446 OL - | ||
In reviewing Applicants' 11/7/86 Answers to CASE CPRT Program Plan Interrogatories (Set Nos. 3 through 7), there is one statement on pages 1 and 2 that is of some concern to me: | In reviewing Applicants' 11/7/86 Answers to CASE CPRT Program Plan Interrogatories (Set Nos. 3 through 7), there is one statement on pages 1 and 2 that is of some concern to me: | ||
" Design "By agreement of the parties, and with the concurrenc, of the Board, matters regarding the adequacy of design aspects of the CPRT Program Plan have been excluded from the matters in respect of which the Soard authorized discovery on August 18 and 19, 1986. | |||
Consequently, the Applicants have limited their answers to these interrogatories to matters other than the design adequacy aspects of the CPRT Program Plan." | Consequently, the Applicants have limited their answers to these interrogatories to matters other than the design adequacy aspects of the CPRT Program Plan." | ||
I assume that this statement was only intepded to anply to Applicants' responses to these particular interrogatories and should not be read to mean that Applicants do not believe that discovery is also in order regarding the adequacy of design aspects of the CPRT Program Plat. | I assume that this statement was only intepded to anply to Applicants' responses to these particular interrogatories and should not be read to mean that Applicants do not believe that discovery is also in order regarding the adequacy of design aspects of the CPRT Program Plat. | ||
:::re, cuch di:: :ry i: sp :ifically anticipated (or.d u.as. 111 be forthcoming as we continue our review of documents recently received), as discussed on page 3, item 4, of my 9/15/86 letter to the Board under subject: Memorialization of Changes in kecent Board Orders and/or Filing Dates for Certain Pleadings. | As you are no doubt | ||
In short, Bob, I'm assuming that there is really no problem here, but I just wanted to call it to your attention now and be certain that no misunderstandings developed later. | :::re, cuch di:: :ry i: sp :ifically anticipated (or.d u.as. | ||
Sincerely, CASE (Citizens Association for Sound | 111 be forthcoming as we continue our review of documents recently received), as discussed on page 3, item 4, of my 9/15/86 letter to the Board under subject: Memorialization of Changes in kecent Board Orders and/or Filing Dates for Certain Pleadings. | ||
In short, Bob, I'm assuming that there is really no problem here, but I just wanted to call it to your attention now and be certain that no misunderstandings developed later. | |||
J s&) cM' | If I'm incorrect in this assumption, please give me a call so that we can get it cleared up. | ||
Sincerely, CASE (Citizens Association for Sound Energy J s&) cM' cc: Service List Juanita Ellis, President v/ | |||
8611260129 861121 1 | |||
PDR ADOCK 05000445 O | |||
PDR c | |||
k QO Jy}} | |||
Latest revision as of 02:05, 4 December 2024
| ML20214G537 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 11/21/1986 |
| From: | Ellis J Citizens Association for Sound Energy |
| To: | Gad R ROPES & GRAY |
| References | |
| CON-#486-1666 OL, NUDOCS 8611260129 | |
| Download: ML20214G537 (1) | |
Text
n C A S E==
21h/946-9hh6 (CITIZENS ASSN FOR SOUND ENERGY) 1vlif
~
November 21, 1986 R. K. Gad III, Esq.
NW 25 P4 :42 Ropes & Gray 225 Franklin Street Off!R Boston, Massachusetts 02110 OD
~!
Dear Bob:
a
Subject:
In the Matter of Texas Utilities Electric Company, et al.
Application for an Operating License Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-445 and 50-446 OL -
In reviewing Applicants' 11/7/86 Answers to CASE CPRT Program Plan Interrogatories (Set Nos. 3 through 7), there is one statement on pages 1 and 2 that is of some concern to me:
" Design "By agreement of the parties, and with the concurrenc, of the Board, matters regarding the adequacy of design aspects of the CPRT Program Plan have been excluded from the matters in respect of which the Soard authorized discovery on August 18 and 19, 1986.
Consequently, the Applicants have limited their answers to these interrogatories to matters other than the design adequacy aspects of the CPRT Program Plan."
I assume that this statement was only intepded to anply to Applicants' responses to these particular interrogatories and should not be read to mean that Applicants do not believe that discovery is also in order regarding the adequacy of design aspects of the CPRT Program Plat.
As you are no doubt
- re, cuch di:: :ry i: sp :ifically anticipated (or.d u.as.
111 be forthcoming as we continue our review of documents recently received), as discussed on page 3, item 4, of my 9/15/86 letter to the Board under subject: Memorialization of Changes in kecent Board Orders and/or Filing Dates for Certain Pleadings.
In short, Bob, I'm assuming that there is really no problem here, but I just wanted to call it to your attention now and be certain that no misunderstandings developed later.
If I'm incorrect in this assumption, please give me a call so that we can get it cleared up.
Sincerely, CASE (Citizens Association for Sound Energy J s&) cM' cc: Service List Juanita Ellis, President v/
8611260129 861121 1
PDR ADOCK 05000445 O
PDR c
k QO Jy