ML20245G963

Provides Response to Allegation RIII-88-A-0140 Forwarded to Licensee by for Investigation

ML20245G963
Person / Time
Site:	Zion  File:ZionSolutions icon.png
Issue date:	05/26/1989
From:	Kovach T COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To:	Davis A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
Shared Package
ML20245G953	List: ML20245G949 ML20245G963
References
RIII-88-A-0140, RIII-88-A-140, NUDOCS 8906290335
Download: ML20245G963 (5)

Text

- _ _ - _ - _

' ;fJ' h )i C mmonwst' Edis2n

/'

\\

24~

' 72 West Adams Street. Chicago, Illinois

+

Address Reply to. P6sfDffIce bob 67~

'1 V Chicago, Illinois 60690 0767 May 26, 1989 L7/#f 10 90 IN '

f nISCLOSURE Mr. A. Bert Davis WITI N

Regional Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137

Subject:

Zion Nuclear Power Station Units 1 and 2 License Nos. DPR-39 and DPR Response to Allegations RIII-88-A-0032, RIII-88-A-0081, R111-88-A-0140, R111-88-A-0161, RIII-88-A-0168 and RIII-88-A-0169 NRC._Dacket_Nm_.50.-195_ mnd30-101 References (a):

April 11, 1989 letter from E.G. Greenman to Cordell Reed (Allegation RIII-88-A-0032).

(b):

April 21, 1989 letter from E.G. Greenman to Cordell Reed (Allegation RIII-88-A-0081).

(c):

April 21, 1989 letter from E.G. Greenman to Cordell Reed (Allegation RIII-88-A-0140).

(d):

April 11, 1989 letter from E.G. Greenman to Cordell Reed (Allegation RIII-88-A-0161 and RIII-88-A-0169).

(e): April 10, 1989 letter from E.G. Greenman to Cordell Reed (Allegation RIII-88-A-0168).

Mr. Davis:

transmitted the above referenced allegations The referenced letters to Commonwealth Edison for our investigation and response.

The due dates for a number of the allegations '. ave been extended in telepone conversations between Mr. J. Hinds and G. Trzyna. g g

)f/ ib )

"100FR INFORM NG DOES NOT APPL M LETTER IS PXE TE F OM THE ENCLOS L r,D Cov Q 4 h, 8]O(99t&3 33 omm a um.ra.w.

g~,,

(Cf y re. fr:W /?* t G *

• rs 4W 0

~

l

A

-_e_

. May 26,1989 I

h.

'A.B. Davis t

i q

The responses to the allegations are contained in the attachments to-The Attachments'to this letter contains information-that is this letter.

Exempt from Public Disclosure in accordance with 10 CFR 2.790(a).

Please direct any questions you may have regarding this matter to i'

this office.

very truly yours, T. J. Kovach Nuclear Licensing Manager

.1m Attaciunents.

cc:

Zion Resident Inspector

_.'190 INFORK "3"" 1*** ~ W 7

21

. RKING CFR 2.790 INFORMA N THIS LETTER DOES

• IS S TE FR ENCLOLURE" 0118T

p~

(

]

l

• f'.,

SUt91ARY_0LALLEGATIOl!

RI11-88-A-0032 l

ALLEGh739ti 1.

That in the early 1980s, welding was performed on safety-related modifications by non-certified welders.

l l

2.

That welding was perfortned by non-certified welders and that some of these welders were working on safety-related modifications.

3.

That an If3EW representative was aware at the time (early 1980s), that non-certified welders were working on some safety-related modifications.

1 4.

That a QC inspector stated at that time (early 1980), that he was aware of the concern that a OC supervisor has also heard the conversation with the OC inspector.

5.

That when the alleger raised the concern again in 1988, he was told that they (Zion) wanted to handle this matter "in-house" and he was told not to go to the NRC with this information.

'We believe that to adequately resolve these issues, the following should be addressed:

a) As related to concerns 1 and 2, you should conduct an examination of sbfety-related modification packages; involving any welding; on a random sampling basis; from 1981 through M83.

In this examination, identify all welders involved; establish certification status of each welders and identify any non-certified welding performed.

In the event that you idertify non-certified welders and welding, describe what actions you have taken or plan to take to certify the welds in question, i.e.,

NDT, reinspection program or engineering analysis.

In your response, include the details of your plan, including the modification packages examined; welders identified and status of their certification, list uncertified welds identified; and, if required, the methodology for certifying the welds identified.

l b.

As related to concerns 3 and 4, you should identify all personnel involved with Quality Control and Welding on safety-related modifications, between 1981 and 1983, remaiting at Zion Station.

Following identification of personnel, develop a plan to investigate these concerns.

In your response, provide the details of your plan to investigate concerns 3 and 4, including those personnel identified and the rnethodology employed l

to support a conclude the concerns are substantiated or unsubstantiated.

If substantiated, provide your corrective actions to address the immediate concern and actions to prevent recurrence.

N 10 CFR-MATION WITI IIOUINROM PUBLIC ObOSURE l

y29 l

~t.

(

(

RU Idi-A _0012 c.

As related to concern 5, investigate alleged " cover-up" attempt, report details of plans findings and conclusions; supporting documentation and corrective actions, if required.

These items are forwarded as an indication of the minimum effort that would resolve this issue but are not intended to limit or prevent your pursuit of other additional measures you determine are appropriate for addressing the allegation.

RESEOUSE:

On March 11, 1988, Zion Station was notified by the alleger of these specific allegations and performed the following investigation:

During the period in question (January, 1,

1981 to December 31, 1983) there were four Substation Construction welders qualified to perform safety related welds at Zion Station (see Attachment A).

In addition there were 20 qualified Quality Control inspectors at Zion during the period in question (see Attachment B).

Fourteen of those individuals are still assigned to Zion Station although only 2 individuals remain in the Quality Control Department.

Six of the 20 inspectors were not certified in welding.

During the months of March through April 1988 numerous interviews were conducted with anembers of the Substation Construction Department, Quality Control Department and Quality Assurance Department. The purpose was to detail how welding was accomplished during the period in question.

In addition, Quality Assurance Department audits and surveillance were reviewed to determine if qualified welders and inspectors were used (Attachment C).

A 1981 surveillance report is also attached that includes a review of SSC work activities during the period in question.

In June 1988, a listing of all modifications performed by Substation Construction during the period in question was developed.

Safety related modifications were highlighted in yellow.

The listing was given to the Station Quality Assurance Department to randomly select several modifications to visually verify the quality of the welds with a qualified weld Inspector (see Attachment D).

No discrepant welds were noted.

Additionally, a review of the documentation on the welds has determined that all the welds were performed by certified welders.

Based upon the results of the qualification review of SSC welders and OC inspectors, the interviews of personnel performing those a"tivition. the independent field walkdown of selected safety teinted modifications nna the lack of specific detail provided by the alleger, the allegation was unsubstantiated. The review conducted upon receipt of the 11PC allegation disclosed no additional facts to support any other conclusion.

Ther ef or e, Allegation 88-A0032 items 1 through 4 is also deemed to be unsubstantiated.

10CEIQ.790lNFORMNON

~

WITHI

&FRDYPUDMG-Disc. SUJtE J% y g y

(

(

(

.~

'=

7 *,

EllL-BJ-A _DRA2

}

_3 REER0 tie E_TQ_EREfJf3f_AIMGATl.Qti A. 'A review of QA audits and surveillance conducted during the period in question disclosed no unqualified welders. A review of the weld documentation determined that the welds were performed by certified welders. The field investigation of selected modifications resulted in no discrepant welds being identified.

Attachment A lists the SSC certified welders. who performed work on the modifications that were field verified.

The method employed for the.fleid verification was a visual examination performed by a qualified QA inspector. The criteria used was any suspect weld would be further examined using the appropriate NDE method (i.e. PT or RT).

The modifications reviewed, the elders used and t.he j

qualifications of the person performing the walkdowns can be found in attachments A, C and D.

i B.

Attachments A and B identify all personnel directly involved with welding and weld inspections during 1981 through 1983. During March and April 1988, an-investigation into the 5 allegat. ions was completed.

Numerous personnel interviews were completed with the alleger, several crew leaders, welders and Quality Control personnel. With regard to the principals involved with allegations 3 and 4, it was noted that only the alleger could recall the meeting where quality concerns were raised.

In any case, no person interviewed could recall any instance of uncertified welders being used at Zion Station.

It was also noted that the Quality Control inspectors used to oversee veld activities were certified in weld fit-ups.

Based upon the results achieved from a review of personnel interviewed, personnel qualifications, and documentation completed, the allegations are unsubstantiated. No further action is planned.

l C.

The alleger notified SSC supervision on March 1, 1988, of his concerns, q

On March 9, 1988, SSC supervision met with the alleger to get more information regarding the specific concerns he had.

On March 11, 1988, the alleger was interviewed by the Regulatory Assurance and Industrial Relations Supervisors at the SSC Division offices in the Waukegan District office. The alleger stated that he was told at,t hat l

meeting not to go t.o the NRC with his concerns.

It was pointed out that l

Zion Station would like to resolve the concerns in house first, but it was agreed the alleger could go to NRC anytime.

All personnel interviewed f

during this investigation were asked if they felt constrained f rom talking to the NRC, No one said that they felt constrained from talking to the NRC.

The interview notes are available for review.

f From the alleger'. viewpoint the concern would appear to be substantiated as he was asked to let the company attempt to resolve his concerns first.

l There was no attempt to cover up any of the concerns. The difficulty with j

this allegation is the lack of specific information tegending uncertified welders.

Even the alleger stated, during the interview, that his own crew did not perform any unqualified welds during the period in question. To i

resolve the issue a policy memo will be forwarded to SSC personnel by June 30, 1989, re-emphasizing the freedom to report any concerns to the NRC without retribution.

2.79 TORMATTOI WITH 0

UUIlu -'8ebOSURE t

011BT/8-lo

~

fY

/~

r

\\.

l

'f' AT_TACILMENT_.h SSC_QUALIEIEA WELREES_.EROM J ANUARLL _1.9. Bl_Ill ROVEIL RE CEM B E R._312_1903 PROCESS DATE NAMI QUAL 1 fled QUAkiflff D.C. Storlie SMAW 2/28/78 Ronald Bardwell SMAW - 6G 6/22/82 Patrick Callahan SMAW - 6G 12/22/81 Joe Gold SMAW - 6G 12/22/81 1

011BT 10 CFR -

ION 01 M! 13 TCTyts LOSURE fah N

2

(

(

'.,7 ATIACintENJ_ D QUALLILCORTROLJJf SPECTORS_AT_210B fROM JN!UARY_b_J903 THROV.GILDEfMRER_3L 19M VT(1)

WELD NNIE CERTJflLD CEETJEIID STJJ4_AT_KIDH Michael Kryslak 10/01/82 11/06/80 YES John A.

lloren 7/22/83 6/14/83 YES David L. Kaley 10/01/82 12/09/82 YES Clifford Lundstrom 3/16/82 5/18/82 YES Charles D. Ginn 11/20/80 5/81 YES Thomas W. Lukens 2/79 6/06/78 NO James Booth 10/30/80 10/30/80 YES Donald Flynn 5/19/78 11/12/B0 NO James Yost 6/05/81 J8/31/81 YES James G. Murphy 5/19/78 11/12/80 NO James Matthews 5/19/78 11/24/80 YES l

Mark llansen 9/28/82 11/15/82 YES Ronald G. Placko 3/08/82 7/24/82 YES Paul Grassle 5/19/79 10/30/80 YES James Ramage (2)

YES Joseph Calderone 2/11/82 (3)

YES Dwayne Shamblin 8/21/81 (3)

NO (3)

YES l

Jmnes Nykolayko Patrick Dillon (3)

YES (3)

YES John Taylor l

(1) Visual Examination (2)

Certification Dates unknown (3) Not Certified l

l l

0118T/7-11 NI p MM is o iscwsun:

/

y14 l

a.

p ynge [

• 2 y

hes Attachrent C 1982 zica Audit Schedule Overview JAMUARY 2242-1 Station Frot edure Control ' ' 8 le 22822 Training

'85e' 22-82-3 Tech Spee Ar. herence 4.1-4 5 8%*4 22-82 4 Station Batt eries

,. s t.

TEERUARY 2 2~T2-5 Ada in! st reti ve Procedure Adherence ' ' ' ?'

22-82-6 Tech :pec Atherence 4.6-4.10

<t 22-82-7 Hojectog orW RtSSI^8 U uiprnent

1. s Y a l

22-E2 8 Froduct Audl t #1 r-***

22 82-10 Maintenance Activities

.w4 MARCH 4#'

22 82-9 Refuel Activities J A'8 '

- l1 22 82-11

.hieper and Lifteri Lead Control

• ** 8 i

22 52-13 Inspection a nd Tests 4.11. 4.12. 4.'15. 4.17 5

• h 22 82-14 Tech Spec Ac herence 22-82-15 ISI 4 t p 22 82-16 Safety Valve

> s es f

APRIL t

- A2-12 Nucletir Fuel Handling. 8torcege, and Shipping A*

• i l 1

1. *8 22-82-17 Records and Reports 4 >' s.'

22-82-18 Station Q.A. Manual 22 82-1')

Tech Spee Atherence 4.19 and 4 22 ? S e t-22-82-20 Product Audi t #2

.l >c-c, 22-82 21 Station Construction (Tirst 1/2) O es 22-82-22 Cnntractor uployce Screening

• i4-MAY

~ 22-82-23 operating F;ocedure Adherence

1. d" 22-R2-24 st.ation taergency Plan and Procedures ' e # <

22-E2-25 Corrective Jetions #1 rJF 22-82-26 Ilousekeepins el

N 22-82-77 Product Audit #3 a ei sa i

JUNE

~ 22-82-28 On-Site /Off-Site Review /0 EAR N '"

22-82-29 Station Q.A.

Manus 1 v '*4 A

22 82-30 Security u ya J tEY l'

22-82-31 Corporato Q.A. Manual Audit,

st l

22 82.12 Radioactive

'a's s t e 7 It et l

22 82-33 Calibration - Tent Instrumentation i e6 p.

22 82-31.

Envirununtal Tech 5 ecs/t!PDES ; O la 22-E2-35 Class IE Eteletrical nvirnom.-ntal Qualifications ( 4 l

l 7 0-GFR2 MATION WITHH ROM P Q SURE I~

C-

(

.s ras. 2' a

Rov.

a 4 s

Attecizept C 1982 2'on Audit Schedule Overview At)CUST 22-82-16 Radiation Pr otection - Eurveyv. Instruments and Records 1 22 82 37 rire Proterdion a<* **

22 82 38 Staff Qualifications e <e4' i

22 52 39 Froduct Audte #4 s

• e4 SEPTEX8M

's 2;M-4 0 calibration Instrumentetton and Standards # ' a ' d

22-82-41 Document Corcrol and Records

?d' d*

22.R2-42 Radicchemica l and chemical Control

? '***e' 22 82 43 Q.A. Treintrg Plan V r t'

• • R2-44 Froduct Audit f5 N*

22-82-45 Substation Construction Activities i27 88 22 82 46 Equipment Toggics 9 r**

OCTOBER 2F82-47 Envirencenta l Contractor (Morrey L Trettel) is '?-W 22-82-48 Etorce Actis itten ec41 t'

22-82-49 Design and Irocurecent Control

,s,1 a -

22-62 50 Wzardoun Hateriale

.*. y v e p

Novmem 2242-51 Station Construction (Second 1/2)

/'R 88 22 82-52 Housekeeping

1. 2 e/.s 22 82-53 Corrective Jctione #2

<< // pr 22-82-54 Btution Orgeniratien i.

-si I

L i

4 q lb 8 (

7' 5-/ I't- -

I Arrawrp:

ffa'rf. age'g' of tf T ed'rance LTTE' lor 01 Quality Assurance r

a (Operations)1 i

.i l

s L

F i(

i l

l' L

I i

10~CFR 2.790 I ' '. R w

WITIll10QiFR TUBLIO rnc1gSURE Y

L

m-W*t-i i

j 1

i b

l l

1 December 15, 1950 I

Messrs:

B. E. Harl K. J, Hansi ss

{

l R. D. Kyrouno M. A. Stanish Subjects 1 81 Audit Schedule Attached i the 1981 pudit echedule for your station.

Only minor changes h ve been made to the schedale. These

{-

include:

1.

Incorporation of 41% Product audits in the schedule:

2.

Addition of Substation Constnaction activities

• i to the schedulag 3

Additicn of IE Bulletin 79-19 to the references i

for the reewaste shipment audits 4.

Additien of IE Circular 79-21 to the reference

' I for procedure adherence audit.

l

0. A. Abre11 Attachment s

cos W. J. Shewski H. P. 5tudtr.ans.

C. L. Tanner F. A. Palmer /D, Galle r

1 l

.1 i

i I

1 N

70CFR M9 INFORMATION WITHHO OM P OSURE V sy'

fI

~

w a*!

3 Dg>9 o

!'M ii I y lWOM Tg ty OEO

.l*

I s

[ uD.

gO@oZ c gr.9U@ U. o*

z9 @-

a

~

,Gw t

e

)

h ksNDq)

C h

t r

I' n

e r

r o

b r

e e

M m

e t

b e

b s

m r.

t o

e e

o.

p t

v c

Q s-e c

o e

i-S O

N D

v.

0 r.

a 0

E l

,l e

e 1

1 p

5 8

)

b,

,r 9,.

u e.

1 B

sed S

1 1

rE e R,

4 r

1 1 uc "A

baCc t

1so 9

1

.u

.l0o A. -

P1 n

sr P.

qeP 2

2 p1 u4 r 8

e c

O r,P e r.

1 1

A m

13 l4 R

a

)

.G.i t P

e l

g 1

r 1.C p n

- i

.A od t s d

1 c

c 0 e

u s-rnSt 2

e e

5 Ci 2

q t3 Pa n

5

. S S

R6d3t t

F n}n p

N e

s-C A-t

1. C.a e

e

.r.e 0

i7.

m50S. s 0 em c

e RE R

i1 r2m l

23e c

54ici ltr C

a a

1 r

k On5l A

s.

er rn o

ct 6.B g

go2

.i9p Nl

2. u o oi5 oAu eP es t~

m q

r.

e hn i

ye aO 5dr rt - Ie I

P.P. L t R c.

4eP Pc5Vll s

c CI My.

n e1 Xlln a

Nc.

.S uio c

GIe e

e ee y

r v r 5.O..f m e7 o

.BBi t

e l u aa v.

, r A.

A.

,V t

i a d A.15 55)Sr

A.1 1 P

.3 f

g P 5 0 Q15XCea e

Ve R

n t t 2

s n.5 n w.5 c2 lo R

• }

- 3en n85 aS e

32er 1

or6671 sP o58 9 ro o11 t n

p 3

i oi i

ided o

9 iF R.s.

1 t

..F e

t..

.tt t.. rnSr d

a & S.P. 0C P.Y A.

a O. P.

P.S a.

a P. P.Ca a

l n

t t

L l

2 t

S T01C C STC 0 S SO0 A

4 i

V

((f f.

s

/

I e

s i

4 E

t c

L r

n U

a e

P G

ic r

I i

t o.

C s

f l

s S

l e

i a-a D

t T

c i

u v-I a

r t

A r

D r

s e

c e

U g

e e

l p.

.t u-r l

a A

d ul i

MQ sr a

e ro t

lam S

eo H

t Fr i o

iC f

t v

raf 0

i gn o

t o

A. -

d i

t u

n3 t

t -

i o C;Lo n

vt n

1 A

A iC c

o -

i o

T n

A l

tn t

i S

e el b

ea n t

ce i

t d

n rc o e sa Ak d

a e

r c a

u d

e o

ci t

i mf My i

nT A

i t

i Sm -

t e

c V

o l

i i s l

o a

a eh u

dut tn a

s e

g r yC r

w y

r n

blo t

ecne ce i

n c

A i

iol&

s tiet

,i r

o i

g lrp n frdn zt e

C h

J r

Z g

atel o i. 3e t

tt c t

)-

e CnEa C

1 e n

i isA a

ds T

o c ci o d

dn M

na tCri n

r v r u

uee ar deers r

A ACv s

t i

r t

n om e a1 ao i

u tI r

ett e t

t nt o

mnch 1 lcm t

e t

i o

c coc l

dn ac a r4 erc e

m t

1 t

t eerie u

uie r

ue r

rteti s

pvt nr d

3t r s

Ap 1

J sed b

s nae oar z

o k ICh2 rso t

?t o a

e nDi s b

h9p P$:

T t

e

=

B

'l1

%]3AT.iqW..mO4% Pw W

-._.A--

_ x1 F

' ;k,

/Mrse. ~..

d L

,g v%

1. 4.w,.o.% w a.

%t,r M(wbeve.ee 4.

sigl6g

. n4.'e+ W 6.

W, i

.$I-4.-)

W?::'&6:t i.5 typs.1 u

i h-22-81-41 r

CA) 1 t

u..,

s l

f 1

F. L. Graesser J *

• To purveille.nce g,

Eubject Quality A'isurance Departments t-I 4 A surveillance cf tub: tation Cons uction (F8C) was corn-f 7tecalving In:.ptcticr.s.

gr pitted on April 29, 1981, i n the areas g'

st.orage, W ider Cuslific.at one, and ca ibration contrci.

i 6

h...

A review cf Esterial l eceivinq f.oports (F R P.' s) Vas finde to ceiving anspectier.s in accordance with

[

verify that $50 perfort's reen Const.ruction Quality Control Panual, i

Section J.0 of the Evbetat: MAN doeurtentation ves cor'plete for the J{,'

Veri fication vm f.ade that J

felicwing s

'l a

.gf

[

TT t'M MM P.O.

6 W

e 3

251007 1 ;1443 tiof frr.an Jimetion Som (6071K. 6072y, 6073Kl f

14E 501404 t-34 1 i'1Ci Caeer. Misture-Prcic! Den 4

(GCG 12 x 3 2 s 6, tmn 10 x 16 s 6, sec 12 m 12 a 121 (N iu0-1. D2300-7, 821S 4)

I f clarnk.sInau. btshinty U.- I S C )

I 1 F' 5C1404 I Ifpr

7H5 i

Verificat.ican was of:,o rr.ade t hat ther abcVe iteren were ident i~

l ficct.end stored Ari accordance with Sectic. 3.1 of the SK:' Oun11ty were obscrud te he reorked with the j

Contrci Manual. The iterm MRR 8 and P.O. 8.*nd/cr Werk order I Utr.b e r ( W. O. 9) anil tr rod in j

the SCC s.ifety-re3ateel c'on:rciled storage area. No dis.rtp vu'ies l

weve' noted ir. the areas of neceiving Inspecticn anit *t orage.

l l

I A review td Wrld@rs Talific0% ions was f.ede to determine whether c.5C welders e r qualif i cit ir, accordonco with Sect a.m si.0 i of the $50 Qualeti Cor.trei Facual. A review cf f orm CW-4C4 i

welder Onsl fi:stion Ter.ts) revealed that D. C. M orlie, 2-2 6-77 to perf errn weld procedure (Fe rorrf of KEC welder, we., cer.ified net CD-15 (SMfA).

Vertfarati:r. vas vade that D. C. Sterlie haa i

raut ained his rp.4lificat;os c u r. e ?.t through review of his I

heldir.g Cferator's Tecee d Carfs for the per;od 4 23-M thrwyh 4 23 81.

1;c discrepantics wese not.ed in the area of welders

~

qualifie0t usas.

t. t erveillaro was c:

.d wted te review sbc in the area cf

j

• 409 and H ut, calitretier c.ontrol.

"Vs. (2) torque w2enches (5/N s

eclibr ataen stichcra and calibration i

were reviewed for e uler.t 1

l

- -.. m g-.-~.,m n _

i 0

a f

10~CritMW NJWIG ATION WITHHOL ERO 1PDEL ISCLOSURE

/'

^

- - " - - ~ " - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ __

f~

~-~

~~~

'~

i-~~ -~~

(

w. -.u

.~. -X,g. ',.

-d j

M

~n am l

3

(

f y.,

h I

.f.

5 notor..j'.Fqt tp,rque

(

no',racs17 dste vas a

tlgycal,dhtWr! ' Th'i no y ted ir.nediately, correct and current t

crquetyga Calibration e tick'e(* e, arg Calibration sheet Aa,11s tp,t. ow l

,p,. g a Stick Cal. Dete teca. Date cal. Date 1 l[ -

i Equirnent-sJ 6

[,,

(Sn ap -On) 54 0

' 1 17-80 5 7-B1 11 17-60 Torque Wrents s

j h."

Torque Wrench

' 11-81 9 11-81 3-11-11

!! nap-on) 5676 availatla to indicate the calibration

[

f No doca:tantetson was contr ol procedur#6 governing Hubstation Construction. Diseassion 4.

With R. Notlef, the Esc Ecak Coordinator, revealed that 68C ad-Jation control.

Mr. Hutley stisequent) r heres to CP 12-1 for calib draf ted a letter to n. Her i dated 4-28-81 documenting thet cali-

/

bration of torque wrenches will be in accordance with CP 12-1.

5 I'

This effectively closes th Ls itar..

O l

calibration of /cp fr.cial Ir.dustries cripping tools W&s also reviewed. The last d ocumented calibrat ion was per f ormed on 10-25-79 for both SSC a id tien Electrical Maintenance Depart-I M deternipted th8% calibration has not anl Fse nt s. Ciscussion with SS

• rhe St at son and Cubstation Cctstrtict thn been dene siner that time.

is rr. quest ed to u.,;uate tse calibration raquirerents for these crir pers. Reesuse of.f j 4crepancie8 in Current calibration of i

cramping tecle, thir. arco silI tse reviewed within approxtrately I

two (2) wc ck t. from the dat of this report f rer Wrification of correctjve actien.

Mwnrc.%"Y.Y.

. %Uh p('

OitAlity Assursace Engir.ger

!!cn Station l

f h

TEH/k p l

/

ect W.1.

Sh e vs ki/C. ts. At: ell i

1 r. Studt. anr,/G.L. ':anc.er A.

Motley R. Horavec F. Mf ren

'i J.P. Moliter O.J. Flim!

T.V.

f.ukens Zict file l

~

9 20 WITHHOL y

c L

lY

..W W" W vv w

.w v.

y

_y_..__

• A.

', l.

97ofC/(NCM b

('

Ch -

August 12. 1968 QA5 224s-082 101 6.3. Flisi

$US.1t01: Jucettien ef3*lds hactiett.d._wlth Modi!isill!M g-Pai6-31 p22-g-nyt. M22-2 76-24 During the period of Atgust 5. 5 and 9,1988, the Quality Assurance Departunt conducted t walkdown of selected modifications inspecting the welds perf ormd for stiese m>dificettor s.

a en trockets and unistrut which tad toen Tt:e welds inspected wei welded to hold up terminal bcx a nd electrical conduit, it.e Welds examined were found to be accepteble not' ng no grcss discontinuities. Tne modifications these welds were 1 isociated with are as follows:

15ULf W2E8!!Mill.1 U1115 Aux feedwater (2A ArW Pug)

M22-2-75 31 5-02535 a.

M22-2-75-27 8-00152 AunFeedwetar(28ATWPump)

M22-2-75-37 6-01153 Aux Feedwater (2C AFW Pump) d M22 2-75-41 6-9272 B1cvdown (2819 Liquid Montter)

M22-2-76-re 7-00440 MP (U-2 Main Generator Inst.'

I Based en the welds esatined these modificattor.s are considered to be.

is L ngd.

i acceptable. This surveillance

• 4 W

R.J. Welle

/

ll Qualify An[urance JEspector 21on Station l

JCfMr UL. Van De Vocrt i

Station Cue 11ty assurance l

[

Superintendent y

tion 5tation l

RJN/ jet /l$62n ces w,J. Shewski/R.W. Stc,ert W.P. Studtfrann l

e T. Rieck Regulatory Assurance 1

Qaality Control Master file l.

.$)

b 4

4 e

r IC DISCLOSURE d

k y

r I

1 ij

M' M24IS3) 13:39 GORDON F.

.lCKSON P.C.

HO. 26 P014/017

• ~

a 7/0/88 e

Coehwf Attu tolt0N COM8ANY

. avg,,,B d ey J. ** @ r isste ')au

• • '7...."..'I.".<'"_"_'*.'.'...'..".'*.".'.'e'**'.,"'

R tXA

.m..

INN'Itu$Iav).

N Nud O'Is.'s5 I*'

s 6*tt'e ecos see i YT-1 QA vssval Ese*hu g

M su.gction tivtt a

.b 28 __

., J., gde,,,b.!.E..

camp wo.--

,, m l

frplcyee,jfqdityJ,.11t ef p.s.

h0t/VT/!nspection Fathod vi-t (# Lyt sual trami^er Certification tevel tasalnation Crades: Central

_ A!J1 Cate 7/17/69 1;ectric SL,}%

Date 7/12/16 Practical N/A Cate N/A i

Composite Crade 85%

Iten(s) taamined in Practical N/A _

WIA 1

i frofelne Courte JcM tte.d 1

'"2 Credit Tqe Civen_jy Le.ation Ngurj Date _ A t s tpr General CICo Zion 1

7/12/88 K. Miller Specific i

Lab.

I

[#,r,t,1fjj ation iterord for level I L 11 I

- Tre compcsite percantile ;rade shall te the su'n of 331/31 of each esamirstion grade, estopt fer certification to Observer or GA Visual ( 6 miner status. For Caservers and Visual teamtrors it shall be the same.

[

he certify that the above named emp1cyte rsets all of the qualification requirements of tt.e C(Co Spec al Process Prosecure Manual for cert'ficatien as a i

YT 1 OA visual teamirer

.. Level 1. This certificate i-expires on Juce 13. 1991.

i I

W. INf!16

' [fastner/Date CECO Level III 3587R e

WITHHOLD FR

-f*17 IG DISCLOSURE lb g

/

[05 24/89 13:39 GORDOt4 1

.lCKSOl4 P.C.

I40. 2t P015/017 Fage tot of 109 W.IIALTH EDILON C W AN'r Rev. 24 5F[CIAL PROC (55 PROCIDURES MA'UAL 10-13 82 NONDt$1RUCT!vt EXAM!hATION.

(

W i

tevel i t ff certiftration Fecord Employee Rodnet,hjLesley,

Certif1(ation Date 7/11/l L MDE/VT/ Inspection Method y 2 OA Visual _ ( 4 miner Certificatics Level _I!

7/12/t1

[xamiration Crades: Cer,eral E0.2%

Cate _

l 5peC1fic J 3.4%

Date 1/1_2J18 Practice)

N/A Cats N/A Ceepestte Grace R 1_

lte'n(s) [mamlevd in Practical N/A W/A tv sintric Cou_r,1es Corpleted Crsdit

{/.

Tvee Gjvongv t< cation Moors Ogje Instructer_

Ceneral CICo 2 ion 1

7/12/88 K. Miller l

5;ettfic Lat.

{artification Ettert!, lor level 18.,,l]!,

The conip0 site percentile grade shall be the sum of 33 1/31 cf each easttr.ation grace, except for certif tsstion to Observer er CA Yllugl Darl er status. For Ctstrvers and Qt Visual Daminers it shall be tr.e sane.

We certify that the abovo ramed erployee sieets all cf the tvalification recutrements of tr.e CICo $pe tal Protes frocestre Manual for certification as a vt.2 OA visual faarA er

_. Level L. This certificate i

espires on June 1), 19fl.

l h

6/k!f a m ee, J A w $ TLC 1 m oi,e,,oa,e 3tf?R e

4_FR 2.7J0JNFTTN5fETION WITLittoIJFrROMTURL10' 9URE W

71~

f,.

J05s/24/09 13:40 GDPDON 1-

.lOGOt4 P. C.

140. 2I, P036/03'T

-c C0dNO WfALTH EDI$0N M P W

' O'. 24 pp JAL 5P[CIAL PPOC[$$ FROCtNEf1 NA' IO-II-87 nD@L51RUCTIVE EXAMINATION 7.

1.j,.g tevel 1 t 11 Certification F"oto j

(mployee Apfney b Neeley Certif ttation D4te _

7/11/68 3 CA vitLJ Jrder.-

1 HDE/VT/Intpettion Method yl Certification Level 11

[saminatten Crates: Central f 3 at _ Date 7 /1?_/M 921 __ Date _

7/12tJE

.$;ecific N/A Date N/A Practica)

W/A Compestic Crade J2.7%

Iti :(s) tusmined in Practical N/A

'l T. ainIn,jLCourie1Costititi Credit b'~h gat!gn

HoJrg, Cate

.I,Lg t ryc tor J.,

clven_ev t

a Central C(Co Zlon 1

7/12/86 K. Miller

$secific n

t l

Lab.

Gertif itationAerordfo*tenel!EE I

The compestte percentils grade stall to the sum of 23-1/31 of each enestriation grade. estopt fde ref ttfication to Otserver or OA vitoal tramicer For Observert and (A Vlsgal (saminers it shall te the ume.

g status.

We certify that the atoit named emplC)ee metts all of the quellficatica I

cial Protest Frotecure Manual for certif1(ation ra:utrements of the CtCo So as e

_VT M & yal fiaminer

. Level 1. Thlt tertiff tste i,

espires on jyr's 13. 1991, l

h Om' Essininer/Cate fl.1C/1v*s141 C

Level It!

3!t?R N 0 4 E R.2.

70li55A30N

% M HO OM PUBITCTJL OSURE f0f

--u-

y i-

/'

' cp2MM.

13:40 GORDOt1 E '.4CKSON P.C.

I40.2E; P017/017 8:

Cl>,MONNI ALTH LC]LON CCMTANY Page 101 cf 10$

SPICIAL FAOCf 55 FROCIDUR[$ F/N'.AL Rev. 24 10-13-87 WOND!$TRUCTIV[ [KAMIhATION

/d 110 tevel 1 1 ff rn tiffratict Petert!

trrployee A ety J. neelev Certiffration Date 7/13L8J.,__

hDt/Vf/ Inspection Method VT-4 QA_Jityst taastner i

Certification Level

)

fsemireotion Grades:. General 6*1 Cate 7/lf/BE

${ettfit 80%

Date 7/I2/8)-

Fractical k'A Date N/A e

Comt.ostte Grade got Item 0 1 Czastned in FrattlC41 N/A N/A i

Trait f ra CpgteLCoJm 1e,t,gg i

I;

p. *:

creeit

_ Type C1ven fr

,,Jga t ioe Noors Date In g.tLe. tor

[

c Central CI:c lion 1

7/12/88 K. Miller Specific Lab.

I t

(certification RecorQor t.evel IM The toeposite percentile grade shall be it:e sLa of 33-1/31 of each examination grade, escept for Ce1 ttfication to Otserver of QA Visual Isamtrer :

status. Tcr Observers and QA Vti val Esar.iners it shall to the tare.

g We certify that tte above rased empic es etets all of the gustif tration reculrements of the CICo Special Procest r{rotecure Maros) for certification a$ a f

.V_7_48 Visual tsariner

. Level !!

This Certlfftste expires on Jge,L}3,1991 D.!)

l

'A h

CICo C'e n'e#

Q(4 Lf2;'7 4 2.f g,y l

I satir. ort; ate g

l l

3587R l

e d

iscws o

wn3pmarrno Mo

-