ML20279A812: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:Medical Events Subcommittee Report Ronald D. Ennis, M.D. | {{#Wiki_filter:1 1 | ||
Advisory Committee on the Medical Uses of Isotopes September 21, 2020 | Medical Events Subcommittee Report Ronald D. Ennis, M.D. | ||
Advisory Committee on the Medical Uses of Isotopes September 21, 2020 | |||
* Ronald D. Ennis, M.D. (Chair) | * Ronald D. Ennis, M.D. (Chair) | ||
* Richard Green | * Richard Green | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
* Harvey Wolkov, M.D. | * Harvey Wolkov, M.D. | ||
NRC Staff Resource: Donna-Beth Howe, Ph.D. | NRC Staff Resource: Donna-Beth Howe, Ph.D. | ||
2 2 | 2 Subcommittee Members 1 | ||
2 | |||
2 | |||
* As begun in 2018, every two years the Medical Events Subcommittee will report on our review of events over the last 4 years to discern common themes within each section of 10 CFR Part 35 and across the sections, to inform a discussion of possible ways to decrease medical events (MEs). | * As begun in 2018, every two years the Medical Events Subcommittee will report on our review of events over the last 4 years to discern common themes within each section of 10 CFR Part 35 and across the sections, to inform a discussion of possible ways to decrease medical events (MEs). | ||
* The Subcommittee reviewed the medical events for FYs 2016-2019. | * The Subcommittee reviewed the medical events for FYs 2016-2019. | ||
3 | 3 Process Summary | ||
Summary | |||
* Two overarching themes remained | * Two overarching themes remained | ||
- Performance of a time out immediately prior to administration of radioactive byproduct material, as is done in surgery and other settings, could have prevented some MEs | |||
- Lack of recent or frequent performance of the specific administration appears to be a contributing factor in a number of cases | |||
* One new issue identified | * One new issue identified | ||
- Increase complexity of unsealed source administrations of newer agents may be leading to more equipment related MEs 4 | |||
3 4 | |||
3 35.200 Use of Unsealed Byproduct Material for Imaging and Localization 5 | |||
3/5 possibly preventable by time out Medical Events Summary 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total Cause Wrong drug 0 | |||
0 0 | |||
0 0 | |||
Wrong dosage 0 | |||
2 0 | |||
0 2 | |||
Wrong patient 0 | |||
1 0 | |||
0 1 | |||
Extravasation 0 | |||
1 0 | |||
0 1 | |||
Human error 0 | |||
0 0 | |||
1 (8 patients) 1 (8 patients) | |||
Total 0 | |||
4 0 | |||
1 5 | |||
2016 2017 2018 2019 Total WD not done or incorrectly 1 | |||
2 1 | |||
2 6 | |||
Error in delivery | |||
(# capsules) 1 1 | |||
0 1 | |||
3 Wrong dose 1 | |||
0 0 | |||
0 1 | |||
Equipment 0 | |||
0 1 | |||
4 5 | |||
Human Error 1 | |||
0 0 | |||
1 2 | |||
Wrong patient 1 | |||
1 0 | |||
1 3 | |||
Total 4 | |||
4 2 | 4 2 | ||
9 19 6 | |||
Time out could prevent 13/19 = 68% | |||
Emerging increase in equipment issues 5/19 = 26% compared to 10% in last review 35.300 Use of Unsealed Byproduct Material, Written Directive Required Medical Events Summary 5 | |||
6 | |||
4 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total Applicator issue (e.g. movement during implant 1 | |||
Total | 0 0 | ||
0 1 | |||
Wrong site implanted (e.g. penile bulb) 1 1 | |||
1 1 | |||
4 Activity/prescription error (e.g. air kerma vs mCi, enter wrong activity in planning software) 0 1 | |||
0 1 | |||
2 Prostate Dose 18 5 | |||
11 3* | |||
37 New device 0 | |||
0 1 | |||
0 1 | |||
Total 20 7 | |||
13 5 | |||
45 35.400 Manual Brachytherapy Medical Events Summary | |||
*Still using dose-based criteria 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total Total MEs 20 7 | |||
13 5 | |||
45 Time out may have prevented ME 0 | |||
1 0 | |||
1 2 | |||
Lack of experience may have played a role 1 | |||
1 1 | |||
1 4 | |||
8 35.400 Manual Brachytherapy Medical Events Summary 7 | |||
8 | |||
5 | |||
* Many MEs in this category are no longer categorized as MEs due to change from dose to activity-based definition, although even in 2019, this definition continued to be used for some MEs. | * Many MEs in this category are no longer categorized as MEs due to change from dose to activity-based definition, although even in 2019, this definition continued to be used for some MEs. | ||
* Lack of experience possibly plays a role in the true MEs of this type, but hard to assess to what degree in each case. | * Lack of experience possibly plays a role in the true MEs of this type, but hard to assess to what degree in each case. | ||
* In approximately 13% (down from 25% in last review) of cases, a time-out or enhanced retraining prior to performance of an uncommon procedure might have prevented the ME. | * In approximately 13% (down from 25% in last review) of cases, a time-out or enhanced retraining prior to performance of an uncommon procedure might have prevented the ME. | ||
9 | 9 35.400 Manual Brachytherapy 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total Cause Wrong position 1 | ||
35. | 2 3 | ||
4 10 Wrong reference length 0 | |||
2 1 | |||
4 7 | |||
Wrong plan 1 | |||
0 2 | |||
0 3 | |||
Wrong dose/source strength 0 | |||
0 1 | |||
0 1 | |||
Machine malfunction 3 | |||
2 3 | |||
1 9 | |||
Software failure 0 | |||
2 (9 pts) 0 1 | |||
3 Total 5 | |||
8 (14 pts) 10 10 33 10 35.600 Use of a sealed source in a remote afterloader unit, teletherapy unit, or gamma stereotactic unit Medical Events Summary 9 | |||
10 | |||
6 2016 2017 2018 2019 Location Breast 0 | |||
0 1 | |||
* 2016 | 0 Gynecological 2 | ||
* 2017 | 7 (14 pts) 7 8 | ||
* 2018 | Skin 1 | ||
* 2019 | 0 1 | ||
0 Bronchus 0 | |||
0 0 | |||
0 Prostate 2 | |||
0 0 | |||
0 Brain 0 | |||
1 1 | |||
2 Total 5 | |||
8 (14 pts) 10 10 11 GYN tumors were most common site of ME. | |||
35.600 Use of a sealed source in a remote afterloader unit, teletherapy unit, or gamma stereotactic unit Medical Events Summary MEs that may have been prevented by timeout (wrong plans or dose) | |||
* 2016 1/5 events | |||
* 2017 0/8 events | |||
* 2018 3/10 events | |||
* 2019 3/10 events Total: 7/33 (21.2%) compared to 16% on last review 12 35.600 Use of a sealed source in a remote afterloader unit, teletherapy unit, or gamma stereotactic unit 11 12 | |||
7 MEs caused by infrequent user This is difficult to determine based on information in NMED. If assumption is made about wrong position as surrogate for infrequent user. | |||
* 2016 | * 2016 1/5 events | ||
* 2017 | * 2017 2/8 events | ||
* 2018 | * 2018 1/10 events | ||
* 2019 | * 2019 1/10 events Total: 5/33 (15.2%) compared to 32% on last review 13 35.600 Use of a sealed source in a remote afterloader unit, teletherapy unit, or gamma stereotactic unit 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total Medical Events 1 | ||
Delayed seed removal | 0 1 | ||
Lost seed | 0 Cause: | ||
Delayed seed removal (patient intervention) 1 1 | |||
Lost seed 0 | |||
Wrong implant site 0 | |||
35.1000 Radioactive Seed Localization Medical Events Summary 14 13 14 | |||
35.1000 Intravenous Cardiac Brachytherapy Medical Events Summary 2016 | 8 35.1000 Intravenous Cardiac Brachytherapy Medical Events Summary 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total Did not follow proper procedure 0 | ||
0 0 | |||
1 1 | |||
Tortuous vessel anatomy 0 | |||
0 1 | |||
1* | |||
2 Catheter issue 0 | |||
0 1 | |||
0 1 | |||
Total 0 | |||
0 2 | |||
1 4 | |||
15 | |||
*AU felt this is patient intervention No time out issues Difficult to assess the unfamiliarity issue, but possibly played a role in some 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total Medical Events 3 | |||
0 1 | |||
0 Cause: | |||
0 0 | |||
0 0 | |||
Back-up battery power source failure 0 | |||
0 1 | |||
0 Patient setup error 2 | |||
0 0 | |||
0 Patient movement 1 | |||
0 0 | |||
2 Wrong site (treatment plan) 0 0 | |||
0 0 | |||
35.1000 Gamma Knife Perfexion' and Icon' Medical Events Summary 16 15 16 | |||
9 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total Total Medical Events 13 15 14 15 57 Cause: | |||
> 20% residual activity remaining in delivery device 9 | |||
Wrong site (catheter placement | 7 11 9 | ||
Wrong dose vial selected | 36 Delivery device setup error 1 | ||
2 2 | |||
Wrong site (catheter placement | 1 6 | ||
Wrong site (WD error) | Wrong dose (treatment plan calculation error) 1 4 | ||
0 1 | |||
6 Wrong site (catheter placement error) 2 2 | |||
0 0 | |||
4 Wrong dose vial selected 1 | |||
4 5 | |||
35.1000 Y-90 Theraspheres Medical Events Summary 17 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total Total Medical Events 13 8 | |||
7 11 39 Cause: | |||
> 20% residual activity remaining in delivery device not due to stasis 9 | |||
7 2 | |||
8 26 Wrong dose (treatment plan calculation error) 2 0 | |||
2 0 | |||
4 Wrong site (catheter placement error) 2 1 | |||
2 2 | |||
7 Wrong site (WD error) 0 0 | |||
1 1 | |||
2 35.1000 Y-90 SirSpheres Medical Events Summary 17 18 | |||
Overview Y-90 Microsphere MEs FY2014 - 2017 | 10 Overview Y-90 Microsphere MEs FY2014 - 2017 N=91 62, 65% | ||
10% | |||
error) | 12% | ||
Device setup error Wrong dose vial/WD error | 6%7% | ||
Cause | |||
> 20% residual not due to stasis Wrong dose (treatment plan error) | |||
Wrong site (catheter placement error) | |||
Device setup error Wrong dose vial/WD error FY2016 - 2019 N=96 | |||
* Review mechanics of Y-90 microsphere delivery device and setup procedures | * Review mechanics of Y-90 microsphere delivery device and setup procedures | ||
* Confirm all data and calculations in treatment plan | * Confirm all data and calculations in treatment plan | ||
* Perform Time Out to assure all elements of treatment are in accordance with Written Directive 20 | * Perform Time Out to assure all elements of treatment are in accordance with Written Directive Actions to Prevent 35.1000 Y-90 Microsphere Medical Events 19 20 | ||
11 RSL Perfexion/Icon Y-90 Microspheres 2016 0/1 2/3 3/26 2017 0 | |||
0 3/23 2018 0/1 0/1 4/21 2019 0 | |||
22 | 0/2 7/26 Total 0/2 2/6 (33%) | ||
17/96 (18%) | |||
35.1000 Medical Events That May Have Been Prevented by Time Out RSL Perfexion/Icon Y-90 Microspheres 2016 0/1 2/3 1/26 2017 0 | |||
0 2/23 2018 0/1 0/1 2/21 2019 0 | |||
0/2 1/26 Total 0/2 (0%) | |||
2/6 (33%) | |||
6/96 (6%) | |||
35.1000 Medical Events That May Have Been Attributed to Lack of Experience or Infrequent User 21 22 | |||
12 | |||
* Identity of patient via two identifiers (e.g., name and DOB) | * Identity of patient via two identifiers (e.g., name and DOB) | ||
* Procedure to be performed | * Procedure to be performed | ||
* Isotope | * Isotope | ||
* Activity | * Activity | ||
* Dosage - second check of dosage calculation and that the WD and dosage to be delivered are identical | * Dosage - second check of dosage calculation and that the WD and dosage to be delivered are identical 23 Possible Elements of a Time Out | ||
* Others, as applicable | * Others, as applicable | ||
- units of activity (LDR prostate) | |||
- anatomic location | |||
- patient name on treatment plan | |||
- treatment plan independent second check has been performed | |||
- reference length (HDR) | |||
- implant site location (RSL) 24 Possible Elements of a Time Out contd. | |||
23 24 | |||
13 | |||
* The subcommittee recommended that the NRC staff issue an Information Notice alerting Authorized Users to the themes identified herein. | * The subcommittee recommended that the NRC staff issue an Information Notice alerting Authorized Users to the themes identified herein. | ||
* IN-19-07, Methods to Prevent Medical Events, was published on August 26, 2019. | * IN-19-07, Methods to Prevent Medical Events, was published on August 26, 2019. | ||
(ADAMS Accession No. ML19240A450) 25 | (ADAMS Accession No. ML19240A450) 25 Subcommittee Response to Findings | ||
* 10 CFR - Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations | * 10 CFR - Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations | ||
* AUs - authorized users | * AUs - authorized users | ||
| Line 127: | Line 268: | ||
* ME - Medical Event | * ME - Medical Event | ||
* RSL - radioactive seed localization | * RSL - radioactive seed localization | ||
* Y yttrium-90 26 26 | * Y yttrium-90 26 Acronyms 25 26}} | ||
Latest revision as of 17:53, 29 November 2024
| ML20279A812 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 09/21/2020 |
| From: | Richard Ennis Advisory Committee on the Medical Uses of Isotopes |
| To: | |
| Jamerson K | |
| References | |
| Download: ML20279A812 (13) | |
Text
1 1
Medical Events Subcommittee Report Ronald D. Ennis, M.D.
Advisory Committee on the Medical Uses of Isotopes September 21, 2020
- Ronald D. Ennis, M.D. (Chair)
- Richard Green
- Darlene Metter, M.D.
- Michael OHara, Ph.D.
- Michael Sheetz
- Harvey Wolkov, M.D.
NRC Staff Resource: Donna-Beth Howe, Ph.D.
2 Subcommittee Members 1
2
2
- As begun in 2018, every two years the Medical Events Subcommittee will report on our review of events over the last 4 years to discern common themes within each section of 10 CFR Part 35 and across the sections, to inform a discussion of possible ways to decrease medical events (MEs).
- The Subcommittee reviewed the medical events for FYs 2016-2019.
3 Process Summary
- Two overarching themes remained
- Performance of a time out immediately prior to administration of radioactive byproduct material, as is done in surgery and other settings, could have prevented some MEs
- Lack of recent or frequent performance of the specific administration appears to be a contributing factor in a number of cases
- One new issue identified
- Increase complexity of unsealed source administrations of newer agents may be leading to more equipment related MEs 4
3 4
3 35.200 Use of Unsealed Byproduct Material for Imaging and Localization 5
3/5 possibly preventable by time out Medical Events Summary 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total Cause Wrong drug 0
0 0
0 0
Wrong dosage 0
2 0
0 2
Wrong patient 0
1 0
0 1
Extravasation 0
1 0
0 1
Human error 0
0 0
1 (8 patients) 1 (8 patients)
Total 0
4 0
1 5
2016 2017 2018 2019 Total WD not done or incorrectly 1
2 1
2 6
Error in delivery
(# capsules) 1 1
0 1
3 Wrong dose 1
0 0
0 1
Equipment 0
0 1
4 5
Human Error 1
0 0
1 2
Wrong patient 1
1 0
1 3
Total 4
4 2
9 19 6
Time out could prevent 13/19 = 68%
Emerging increase in equipment issues 5/19 = 26% compared to 10% in last review 35.300 Use of Unsealed Byproduct Material, Written Directive Required Medical Events Summary 5
6
4 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total Applicator issue (e.g. movement during implant 1
0 0
0 1
Wrong site implanted (e.g. penile bulb) 1 1
1 1
4 Activity/prescription error (e.g. air kerma vs mCi, enter wrong activity in planning software) 0 1
0 1
2 Prostate Dose 18 5
11 3*
37 New device 0
0 1
0 1
Total 20 7
13 5
45 35.400 Manual Brachytherapy Medical Events Summary
- Still using dose-based criteria 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total Total MEs 20 7
13 5
45 Time out may have prevented ME 0
1 0
1 2
Lack of experience may have played a role 1
1 1
1 4
8 35.400 Manual Brachytherapy Medical Events Summary 7
8
5
- Many MEs in this category are no longer categorized as MEs due to change from dose to activity-based definition, although even in 2019, this definition continued to be used for some MEs.
- Lack of experience possibly plays a role in the true MEs of this type, but hard to assess to what degree in each case.
- In approximately 13% (down from 25% in last review) of cases, a time-out or enhanced retraining prior to performance of an uncommon procedure might have prevented the ME.
9 35.400 Manual Brachytherapy 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total Cause Wrong position 1
2 3
4 10 Wrong reference length 0
2 1
4 7
Wrong plan 1
0 2
0 3
Wrong dose/source strength 0
0 1
0 1
Machine malfunction 3
2 3
1 9
Software failure 0
2 (9 pts) 0 1
3 Total 5
8 (14 pts) 10 10 33 10 35.600 Use of a sealed source in a remote afterloader unit, teletherapy unit, or gamma stereotactic unit Medical Events Summary 9
10
6 2016 2017 2018 2019 Location Breast 0
0 1
0 Gynecological 2
7 (14 pts) 7 8
Skin 1
0 1
0 Bronchus 0
0 0
0 Prostate 2
0 0
0 Brain 0
1 1
2 Total 5
8 (14 pts) 10 10 11 GYN tumors were most common site of ME.
35.600 Use of a sealed source in a remote afterloader unit, teletherapy unit, or gamma stereotactic unit Medical Events Summary MEs that may have been prevented by timeout (wrong plans or dose)
- 2016 1/5 events
- 2017 0/8 events
- 2018 3/10 events
- 2019 3/10 events Total: 7/33 (21.2%) compared to 16% on last review 12 35.600 Use of a sealed source in a remote afterloader unit, teletherapy unit, or gamma stereotactic unit 11 12
7 MEs caused by infrequent user This is difficult to determine based on information in NMED. If assumption is made about wrong position as surrogate for infrequent user.
- 2016 1/5 events
- 2017 2/8 events
- 2018 1/10 events
- 2019 1/10 events Total: 5/33 (15.2%) compared to 32% on last review 13 35.600 Use of a sealed source in a remote afterloader unit, teletherapy unit, or gamma stereotactic unit 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total Medical Events 1
0 1
0 Cause:
Delayed seed removal (patient intervention) 1 1
Lost seed 0
Wrong implant site 0
35.1000 Radioactive Seed Localization Medical Events Summary 14 13 14
8 35.1000 Intravenous Cardiac Brachytherapy Medical Events Summary 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total Did not follow proper procedure 0
0 0
1 1
Tortuous vessel anatomy 0
0 1
1*
2 Catheter issue 0
0 1
0 1
Total 0
0 2
1 4
15
- AU felt this is patient intervention No time out issues Difficult to assess the unfamiliarity issue, but possibly played a role in some 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total Medical Events 3
0 1
0 Cause:
0 0
0 0
Back-up battery power source failure 0
0 1
0 Patient setup error 2
0 0
0 Patient movement 1
0 0
2 Wrong site (treatment plan) 0 0
0 0
35.1000 Gamma Knife Perfexion' and Icon' Medical Events Summary 16 15 16
9 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total Total Medical Events 13 15 14 15 57 Cause:
> 20% residual activity remaining in delivery device 9
7 11 9
36 Delivery device setup error 1
2 2
1 6
Wrong dose (treatment plan calculation error) 1 4
0 1
6 Wrong site (catheter placement error) 2 2
0 0
4 Wrong dose vial selected 1
4 5
35.1000 Y-90 Theraspheres Medical Events Summary 17 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total Total Medical Events 13 8
7 11 39 Cause:
> 20% residual activity remaining in delivery device not due to stasis 9
7 2
8 26 Wrong dose (treatment plan calculation error) 2 0
2 0
4 Wrong site (catheter placement error) 2 1
2 2
7 Wrong site (WD error) 0 0
1 1
2 35.1000 Y-90 SirSpheres Medical Events Summary 17 18
10 Overview Y-90 Microsphere MEs FY2014 - 2017 N=91 62, 65%
10%
12%
6%7%
Cause
> 20% residual not due to stasis Wrong dose (treatment plan error)
Wrong site (catheter placement error)
Device setup error Wrong dose vial/WD error FY2016 - 2019 N=96
- Review mechanics of Y-90 microsphere delivery device and setup procedures
- Confirm all data and calculations in treatment plan
- Perform Time Out to assure all elements of treatment are in accordance with Written Directive Actions to Prevent 35.1000 Y-90 Microsphere Medical Events 19 20
11 RSL Perfexion/Icon Y-90 Microspheres 2016 0/1 2/3 3/26 2017 0
0 3/23 2018 0/1 0/1 4/21 2019 0
0/2 7/26 Total 0/2 2/6 (33%)
17/96 (18%)
35.1000 Medical Events That May Have Been Prevented by Time Out RSL Perfexion/Icon Y-90 Microspheres 2016 0/1 2/3 1/26 2017 0
0 2/23 2018 0/1 0/1 2/21 2019 0
0/2 1/26 Total 0/2 (0%)
2/6 (33%)
6/96 (6%)
35.1000 Medical Events That May Have Been Attributed to Lack of Experience or Infrequent User 21 22
12
- Identity of patient via two identifiers (e.g., name and DOB)
- Procedure to be performed
- Isotope
- Activity
- Dosage - second check of dosage calculation and that the WD and dosage to be delivered are identical 23 Possible Elements of a Time Out
- Others, as applicable
- units of activity (LDR prostate)
- anatomic location
- patient name on treatment plan
- treatment plan independent second check has been performed
- reference length (HDR)
- implant site location (RSL) 24 Possible Elements of a Time Out contd.
23 24
13
- The subcommittee recommended that the NRC staff issue an Information Notice alerting Authorized Users to the themes identified herein.
- IN-19-07, Methods to Prevent Medical Events, was published on August 26, 2019.
(ADAMS Accession No. ML19240A450) 25 Subcommittee Response to Findings
- 10 CFR - Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations
- AUs - authorized users
- FY - Fiscal Year
- gyn - gynecological
- HDR - high dose-rate
- LDR - low dose rate
- mCi - milliCurie
- ME - Medical Event
- RSL - radioactive seed localization
- Y yttrium-90 26 Acronyms 25 26