ML21127A074: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:41217 Submis s i o n o f F e d e ral Rule s Unde r the C o n g r e s s i o n a l Review Act President of the Senate                  Speaker of the House of Representatives                          GAO Please fill the circles electronically or with black pen or #2 pencil.
{{#Wiki_filter:11/09/99 Final Rule Other Major Rule Non-major Rule Submission of Federal Rules Under the Congressional Review Act Please fill the circles electronically or with black pen or #2 pencil.
: 1. Name of Department or Agency                                       2. Subdivision or Office U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                                      Office of the Chief Financial Officer
: 1. Name of Department or Agency
: 3. Rule Title Revision of Fee Schedules, Fee Recovery for Fiscal Year 2021
: 2. Subdivision or Office
: 4. Rule Identification Number (RIN) or Other Unique Identifier (if applicable)     RIN 3150-AK24
: 3. Rule Title
: 5.            Major Rule        Non-major Rule
: 4. Rule Identification Number (RIN) or Other Unique Identifier (if applicable) 11/09/99
: 6.            Final Rule          Other
: 7. W ith respect to this rule, did your agency solicit public com m ents?                Yes          No        N/A
: 8. Priority of Regulation (fill in one)
: 8. Priority of Regulation (fill in one)
Economically Significant; or                     Routine and Frequent or Significant; or                                  Informational/Adm inistrative/Other Substantive, Nonsignificant                        (Do not complete the other side of this form if filled in above.)
Economically Significant; or Significant; or Substantive, Nonsignificant Routine and Frequent or Informational/Administrative/Other (Do not complete the other side of this form if filled in above.)
: 9. Effective Date (if applicable)   60 days after date of publication
: 9. Effective Date (if applicable) 5.
: 10. Is a concise Summary of the Rule provided?                   Yes                No Submitted by:                                                           (signature)
6.
Eugene Dacus Name: ___________________________________________
: 7. With respect to this rule, did your agency solicit public comments?
Director, Office of Congressional Affairs
: 10. Is a concise Summary of the Rule provided?
Submitted by: (signature)
Name: ___________________________________________


==Title:==
==Title:==
For Congressional Use Only:
For Congressional Use Only:
Date Received:
Date Received:
Com m ittee of Jurisdiction:
Committee of Jurisdiction:
11/09/99 Reset
GAO President of the Senate Yes No Speaker of the House of Representatives Yes No N/A 41217

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of the Chief Financial Officer Revision of Fee Schedules, Fee Recovery for Fiscal Year 2021 RIN 3150-AK24 60 days after date of publication Eugene Dacus Director, Office of Congressional Affairs Reset


41217 Yes No N/A A. W ith respect to this rule, did your agency prepare an analysis of costs and benefits?
11/09/99 A. With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare an analysis of costs and benefits?
B. W ith respect to this rule, at the final rulemaking stage, did your agency
B. With respect to this rule, at the final rulemaking stage, did your agency
: 1. certify that the rule would not have a significant econom ic impact on a substantial number of small entities under 5 U.S.C. § 605(b)?
: 1. certify that the rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under 5 U.S.C. § 605(b)?
: 2. prepare a final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis under 5 U.S.C. § 604(a)?
: 2. prepare a final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis under 5 U.S.C. § 604(a)?
C. W ith respect to this rule, did your agency prepare a written statement under
C. With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare a written statement under
    § 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995?
§ 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995?
D. With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)?
D. With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)?
E. Does this rule contain a collection of information requiring OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995?
E. Does this rule contain a collection of information requiring OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995?
F. Did you discuss any of the following in the preamble to the rule?
F. Did you discuss any of the following in the preamble to the rule?
E.O. 13132, Federalism E.O. 12630, Government Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform E.O. 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks Other statutes or executive orders discussed in the preamble concerning the rulemaking process (please specify)
E.O. 13132, Federalism E.O. 12630, Government Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform E.O. 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks Other statutes or executive orders discussed in the preamble concerning the rulemaking process (please specify)
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 11/09/99}}
Yes No N/A 41217 The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996}}

Latest revision as of 09:08, 29 November 2024

Congressional Review Act Form President of the Senate
ML21127A074
Person / Time
Issue date: 06/02/2021
From: Eugene Dacus
Office of Congressional Affairs
To:
smh
References
RIN 3150-AK24
Download: ML21127A074 (2)


Text

11/09/99 Final Rule Other Major Rule Non-major Rule Submission of Federal Rules Under the Congressional Review Act Please fill the circles electronically or with black pen or #2 pencil.

1. Name of Department or Agency
2. Subdivision or Office
3. Rule Title
4. Rule Identification Number (RIN) or Other Unique Identifier (if applicable) 11/09/99
8. Priority of Regulation (fill in one)

Economically Significant; or Significant; or Substantive, Nonsignificant Routine and Frequent or Informational/Administrative/Other (Do not complete the other side of this form if filled in above.)

9. Effective Date (if applicable) 5.

6.

7. With respect to this rule, did your agency solicit public comments?
10. Is a concise Summary of the Rule provided?

Submitted by: (signature)

Name: ___________________________________________

Title:

For Congressional Use Only:

Date Received:

Committee of Jurisdiction:

GAO President of the Senate Yes No Speaker of the House of Representatives Yes No N/A 41217



U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of the Chief Financial Officer Revision of Fee Schedules, Fee Recovery for Fiscal Year 2021 RIN 3150-AK24 60 days after date of publication Eugene Dacus Director, Office of Congressional Affairs Reset

11/09/99 A. With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare an analysis of costs and benefits?

B. With respect to this rule, at the final rulemaking stage, did your agency

1. certify that the rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under 5 U.S.C. § 605(b)?
2. prepare a final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis under 5 U.S.C. § 604(a)?

C. With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare a written statement under

§ 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995?

D. With respect to this rule, did your agency prepare an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)?

E. Does this rule contain a collection of information requiring OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995?

F. Did you discuss any of the following in the preamble to the rule?

E.O. 13132, Federalism E.O. 12630, Government Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform E.O. 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks Other statutes or executive orders discussed in the preamble concerning the rulemaking process (please specify)

Yes No N/A 41217 The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996