Latest revision as of 23:19, 19 November 2024

Text

ITAAC Closure Verification Evaluation Form (Vef) for ITAAC Number 2.2.01.11b (Index No. 118) for Vogtle Unit 3 Combined License (VOG3)
	ML21238A329
Person / Time
Site:	Vogtle
Issue date:	08/25/2021
From:	; NRC/NRR/VPOB
To:	;
	Mike Webb, VPO
References
	ITAAC 2.2.01.11b
	Download: ML21238A329 (3)
	v • d • e

ITAAC CLOSURE VERIFICATION EVALUATION FORM (VEF-ICN)

The Lead Reviewer in concert with other reviewer(s) assigned to an ITAAC closure review will complete this form for the ITAAC under review.

Docket No: 5200025 Plant Name: Vogtle Unit 3 Combined License Licensee Name: Southern Nuclear Operating Combined NPF-91 Company, Inc. License No:

ITAAC ID No: 2.2.01.11b ITAAC Type: Targeted

ITAAC Family Designation or 07D enter N/A:

ITAAC Closure Notification (ICN) ADAMS ML No: ML21225A311

Name of Lead Reviewer: Webb, Michael

Enter Yes in the blank at the beginning of a statement below if the whole statement is true, No if the whole or part of the statement is not true, and N/ A if the statement is not applicable.

a. Yes The ICN identifies all of the following: (1) licensee, (2) plan t site name, (3) unit number, and (4) plants docket number.

b. Yes The ITAAC as stated in the ICN matches the ITAAC as stated in t he combined license.

c. Yes NRC personnel with the requisite technical and engineering knowledge has/have determined that the ITAAC Determination Basis (IDB) of the ICN contains sufficient information including a summary of the methodology for performing the ITAAC, to demonstrate that the l icensee has successfully performed the inspection, test, and/or analysi s stated in the ITAAC. The methodology described in the IDB of the ICN eit her was reviewed and approved by the NRC, or is acceptable based on sou nd scientific, mathematical, and/or engineering principles, and is repeatable, if necessary, without any significant change to the reported re sult.

d. Yes NRC personnel with the requisite technical and engineering knowledge has/have determined that the IDB of the ICN contains sufficient information to demonstrate that the licensee has fully met the entire acceptance criterion stated in the ITAAC.

e. N/A For ITAAC specified as being performed on as-built structures, systems, or components (SSCs): If the licensee performed the inspectio ns, tests, and/or analyses of the ITAAC at location(s) other than the fina l installed

Page 1 of 3 ITAAC CLOSURE VERIFICATION EVALUATION FORM (VEF-ICN)

location, the licensee has based on the guidance in NEI 08-01 e ither summarized a technical justification or provided a reference to a generic technical justification in the IDB of the ICN that establishes why it was acceptable to perform the ITAAC at location(s) other than the f inal installed location. [Enter N/A if the ITAAC was not performed a t a remote location or if the ITAAC is not specified as as-built.]

f. N/A If ITAAC is a Reference ITAAC, all the ITAAC it references ha ve been verified as successfully completed. (Enter N/A if ITAAC is n ot a reference ITAAC.)

g. Yes All planned inspections for this ITAAC (if any) have been compl eted as indicated in the Construction Inspection Program Management Sys tem (CIPIMS). Either NRC inspectors found no ITAAC findings for th is ITAAC or any ITAAC findings are closed as indicated in CIPIMS and the ICN for this ITAAC.

h. Yes The ICN indicates that the licensee completed the ITAAC as affi rmed by the signature of a licensee representative.

i. No During concurrence review, a potential problem was identified w hich prevents verifying the completion of the ITAAC

j. No An additional reviewer was assigned to the ITAAC closure review with his or her name entered into the blank at the top of this page base d on his or her expertise being required.

If the reviewers have verified that the licensee successfully c ompleted the inspections, tests, and analyses prescribed for this ITAAC, and that the acceptance criteria have been met then this determination is based on information available at the tim e and is subject to the licensees ability to maintain the condition that the acceptance criteria are met. If the staff receives new information suggesting that the staffs determination on this I TAAC is incorrect, then the staff will determine whether this ITAAC should be reopened by the licensee. An affirmative NRC staff determination on this ITAAC will be used to support a subsequen t finding, pursuant to 10 CFR 52.103(g), at the end of construction that all acceptance crite ria in the combined license are met. The ITAAC closure verification process is not finalized f or this ITAAC until the NRC makes an affirmative finding under 10 CFR 52.103(g).

Lead Reviewer: Webb, Michael Date: 8/25/2021

Lead Approver: Gaslevic, James Date: 8/25/2021

Licensing PM: Armstrong, Garry

Page 2 of 3 ITAAC CLOSURE VERIFICATION EVALUATION FORM (VEF-ICN)

Page 3 of 3

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 =Text=
 {{#Wiki_filter:ITAAC CLOSURE VERIFICATION EVALUATION FORM (VEF-ICN)
 The Lead Reviewer in concert with other reviewer(s) assigned to an ITAAC closure review will complete this form for the ITAAC under review.
-Docket No:           5200025                             Plant Name:         Vogtle Unit 3 Combined License Licensee Name:       Southern Nuclear Operating          Combined            NPF-91 Company, Inc.                       License No:
-ITAAC ID No:         2.2.01.11b                          ITAAC Type:         Targeted ITAAC Family Designation or       07D enter N/A:
-ITAAC Closure Notification (ICN) ADAMS ML No:                                ML21225A311 Name of Lead Reviewer:                                                       Webb, Michael Enter Yes in the blank at the beginning of a statement below if the whole statement is true, No if the whole or part of the statement is not true, and N/A if the statement is not applicable.
-: a. Yes       The ICN identifies all of the following: (1) licensee, (2) plant site name, (3) unit number, and (4) plants docket number.
-: b. Yes       The ITAAC as stated in the ICN matches the ITAAC as stated in the combined license.
-: c. Yes       NRC personnel with the requisite technical and engineering knowledge has/have determined that the ITAAC Determination Basis (IDB) of the ICN contains sufficient information including a summary of the methodology for performing the ITAAC, to demonstrate that the licensee has successfully performed the inspection, test, and/or analysis stated in the ITAAC. The methodology described in the IDB of the ICN either was reviewed and approved by the NRC, or is acceptable based on sound scientific, mathematical, and/or engineering principles, and is repeatable, if necessary, without any significant change to the reported result.
-: d. Yes       NRC personnel with the requisite technical and engineering knowledge has/have determined that the IDB of the ICN contains sufficient information to demonstrate that the licensee has fully met the entire acceptance criterion stated in the ITAAC.
-: e.      N/A      For ITAAC specified as being performed on as-built structures, systems, or components (SSCs): If the licensee performed the inspections, tests, and/or analyses of the ITAAC at location(s) other than the final installed Page 1 of 3
-ITAAC CLOSURE VERIFICATION EVALUATION FORM (VEF-ICN) location, the licensee has based on the guidance in NEI 08-01 either summarized a technical justification or provided a reference to a generic technical justification in the IDB of the ICN that establishes why it was acceptable to perform the ITAAC at location(s) other than the final installed location. [Enter N/A if the ITAAC was not performed at a remote location or if the ITAAC is not specified as as-built.]
+Docket No: 5200025 Plant Name: Vogtle Unit 3 Combined License Licensee Name: Southern Nuclear Operating Combined NPF-91 Company, Inc. License No:
-: f. N/A      If ITAAC is a Reference ITAAC, all the ITAAC it references have been verified as successfully completed. (Enter N/A if ITAAC is not a reference ITAAC.)
+ITAAC ID No: 2.2.01.11b ITAAC Type: Targeted
-: g. Yes       All planned inspections for this ITAAC (if any) have been completed as indicated in the Construction Inspection Program Management System (CIPIMS). Either NRC inspectors found no ITAAC findings for this ITAAC or any ITAAC findings are closed as indicated in CIPIMS and the ICN for this ITAAC.
-: h. Yes       The ICN indicates that the licensee completed the ITAAC as affirmed by the signature of a licensee representative.
+ITAAC Family Designation or 07D enter N/A:
-: i. No       During concurrence review, a potential problem was identified which prevents verifying the completion of the ITAAC
+ITAAC Closure Notification (ICN) ADAMS ML No: ML21225A311
-: j. No       An additional reviewer was assigned to the ITAAC closure review with his or her name entered into the blank at the top of this page based on his or her expertise being required.
-If the reviewers have verified that the licensee successfully completed the inspections, tests, and analyses prescribed for this ITAAC, and that the acceptance criteria have been met then this determination is based on information available at the time and is subject to the licensees ability to maintain the condition that the acceptance criteria are met. If the staff receives new information suggesting that the staffs determination on this ITAAC is incorrect, then the staff will determine whether this ITAAC should be reopened by the licensee. An affirmative NRC staff determination on this ITAAC will be used to support a subsequent finding, pursuant to 10 CFR 52.103(g), at the end of construction that all acceptance criteria in the combined license are met. The ITAAC closure verification process is not finalized for this ITAAC until the NRC makes an affirmative finding under 10 CFR 52.103(g).
+Name of Lead Reviewer: Webb, Michael
-Lead Reviewer: Webb, Michael                                                      Date: 8/25/2021 Lead Approver: Gaslevic, James                                                    Date: 8/25/2021 Licensing PM: Armstrong, Garry Page 2 of 3
+Enter Yes in the blank at the beginning of a statement below if the whole statement is true, No if the whole or part of the statement is not true, and N/ A if the statement is not applicable.
+: a. Yes The ICN identifies all of the following: (1) licensee, (2) plan t site name, (3) unit number, and (4) plants docket number.
+: b. Yes The ITAAC as stated in the ICN matches the ITAAC as stated in t he combined license.
+: c. Yes NRC personnel with the requisite technical and engineering knowledge has/have determined that the ITAAC Determination Basis (IDB) of the ICN contains sufficient information including a summary of the methodology for performing the ITAAC, to demonstrate that the l icensee has successfully performed the inspection, test, and/or analysi s stated in the ITAAC. The methodology described in the IDB of the ICN eit her was reviewed and approved by the NRC, or is acceptable based on sou nd scientific, mathematical, and/or engineering principles, and is repeatable, if necessary, without any significant change to the reported re sult.
+: d. Yes NRC personnel with the requisite technical and engineering knowledge has/have determined that the IDB of the ICN contains sufficient information to demonstrate that the licensee has fully met the entire acceptance criterion stated in the ITAAC.
+: e. N/A For ITAAC specified as being performed on as-built structures, systems, or components (SSCs): If the licensee performed the inspectio ns, tests, and/or analyses of the ITAAC at location(s) other than the fina l installed
+Page 1 of 3 ITAAC CLOSURE VERIFICATION EVALUATION FORM (VEF-ICN)
+location, the licensee has based on the guidance in NEI 08-01 e ither summarized a technical justification or provided a reference to a generic technical justification in the IDB of the ICN that establishes why it was acceptable to perform the ITAAC at location(s) other than the f inal installed location. [Enter N/A if the ITAAC was not performed a t a remote location or if the ITAAC is not specified as as-built.]
+: f. N/A If ITAAC is a Reference ITAAC, all the ITAAC it references ha ve been verified as successfully completed. (Enter N/A if ITAAC is n ot a reference ITAAC.)
+: g. Yes All planned inspections for this ITAAC (if any) have been compl eted as indicated in the Construction Inspection Program Management Sys tem (CIPIMS). Either NRC inspectors found no ITAAC findings for th is ITAAC or any ITAAC findings are closed as indicated in CIPIMS and the ICN for this ITAAC.
+: h. Yes The ICN indicates that the licensee completed the ITAAC as affi rmed by the signature of a licensee representative.
+: i. No During concurrence review, a potential problem was identified w hich prevents verifying the completion of the ITAAC
+: j. No An additional reviewer was assigned to the ITAAC closure review with his or her name entered into the blank at the top of this page base d on his or her expertise being required.
+If the reviewers have verified that the licensee successfully c ompleted the inspections, tests, and analyses prescribed for this ITAAC, and that the acceptance criteria have been met then this determination is based on information available at the tim e and is subject to the licensees ability to maintain the condition that the acceptance criteria are met. If the staff receives new information suggesting that the staffs determination on this I TAAC is incorrect, then the staff will determine whether this ITAAC should be reopened by the licensee. An affirmative NRC staff determination on this ITAAC will be used to support a subsequen t finding, pursuant to 10 CFR 52.103(g), at the end of construction that all acceptance crite ria in the combined license are met. The ITAAC closure verification process is not finalized f or this ITAAC until the NRC makes an affirmative finding under 10 CFR 52.103(g).
+Lead Reviewer: Webb, Michael Date: 8/25/2021
+Lead Approver: Gaslevic, James Date: 8/25/2021
+Licensing PM: Armstrong, Garry
+Page 2 of 3 ITAAC CLOSURE VERIFICATION EVALUATION FORM (VEF-ICN)
-ITAAC CLOSURE VERIFICATION EVALUATION FORM (VEF-ICN)
 Page 3 of 3}}

ML21238A329: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 23:19, 19 November 2024

Text

Navigation menu

ML21238A329: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 23:19, 19 November 2024

Text

Navigation menu

Search