ENS 56980: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| cfr = 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(C) | | cfr = 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(C) | ||
| emergency class = Non Emergency | | emergency class = Non Emergency | ||
| notification date = 02/19/2024 | | notification date = 02/19/2024 18:44 | ||
| retracted = Yes | |||
| notification by = Troy Ralston | | notification by = Troy Ralston | ||
| NRC officer = Thomas Herrity | | NRC officer = Thomas Herrity | ||
| event date = 02/19/2024 | | event date = 02/19/2024 10:45 EST | ||
| last update date = | | last update date = 03/15/2024 | ||
| title = Loss of Reactor Building Ventilation | | title = Loss of Reactor Building Ventilation | ||
| event text = The following information was provided by the licensee via email: | | event text = The following information was provided by the licensee via email: | ||
| Line 21: | Line 22: | ||
There was no impact on the health and safety of the public or plant personnel. | There was no impact on the health and safety of the public or plant personnel. | ||
The NRC Resident Inspector will be notified. | The NRC Resident Inspector will be notified. | ||
| URL = https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/event-status/event/2024/ | * * * RETRACTION ON 3/15/24 AT 1315 EDT FROM BILL LINNELL TO ADAM KOZIOL * * * | ||
Upon further investigation, it was verified that the reactor building and the refueling floor radiation monitors are not needed to control the release of radiation for events described in chapter 14 of the updated Final Safety Analysis Report. For the analyzed loss of coolant accident (LOCA), the primary and secondary signals for this purpose were available and unaffected by this event. The radiation monitors provide a tertiary redundant method that is not credited within the station analysis. For all other analyzed accidents, the signal provided by the radiation monitors is not needed, as the secondary containment isolation function and start of the standby gas treatment system are not credited. Additionally, the fuel handling accident was not credible during the time of the event because no activities were in progress on the refueling floor. Therefore, the threshold for reporting the issue as an event or condition that could have prevented the fulfillment of a safety function was not met. | |||
The NRC Resident Inspector has been notified. | |||
Notified R1DO (Jackson) | |||
| URL = https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/event-status/event/2024/20240318en.html#en56980 | |||
}}{{unit info | }}{{unit info | ||
| Unit = 2 | | Unit = 2 | ||
Latest revision as of 07:30, 18 March 2024
| Where | |
|---|---|
Peach Bottom  Pennsylvania (NRC Region 1) | |
| Reporting | |
| 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(C), Loss of Safety Function - Release of Radioactive Material | |
| Time - Person (Reporting Time:+2.98 h0.124 days <br />0.0177 weeks <br />0.00408 months <br />) | |
| Opened: | Troy Ralston 18:44 Feb 19, 2024 |
| NRC Officer: | Thomas Herrity |
| Last Updated: | Mar 15, 2024 |
| 56980 - NRC Website
| |
Peach Bottom with 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(C), Loss of Safety Function - Release of Radioactive Material | |