ML20079F904: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
#REDIRECT [[AECM-82-225, Summarizes Licensee Interpretation of Tech Spec 6.5.2.8 Re Safety Review Committee Audits.Util Will Submit Change in Revision 3 to QA Topical Rept MPL-TOP-1A to State Interpretation & Seek Formal Acceptance]]
| number = ML20079F904
| issue date = 05/26/1982
| title = Summarizes Licensee Interpretation of Tech Spec 6.5.2.8 Re Safety Review Committee Audits.Util Will Submit Change in Revision 3 to QA Topical Rept MPL-TOP-1A to State Interpretation & Seek Formal Acceptance
| author name = Reaves T
| author affiliation = MISSISSIPPI POWER & LIGHT CO.
| addressee name = Haass W
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION (NRR)
| docket = 05000416, 05000417
| license number =
| contact person =
| document report number = AECM-82-225, NUDOCS 8206080257
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| page count = 2
}}
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:- _______ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
  * $                                                                                                                                  $Od Ib MISSISSIPPI POWER & LIGHT COMPANY Helping Build Mississippi Edhlmildd5                    P. O. B OX 1640 J AC K SON, MIS SISSIP PI 3 9 2 05 May 26, 1982 NUCLEAR PRODUCTION DEPAPTMENT i
Mr. Walter P. Ilaass, Chief
)      Quality Assurance Branch Division of Engineering Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.                        20555 Dea r Mr. llaass:
 
==SUBJECT:==
Grand Gu?.f ::: clear Station File 0272/0490/0491/15020 GGNS Tech Specs. 6.5.2.8 AECM-82/225 As a result of recent telephone discussion between your Mr. J. Gilray, Mr. Beneuict of Licensee Qualification Branch and MP&L's Mr. W. Edge and I, MP&L is submitting the following interpretation of the Grand Gulf Technical Specification Section 6.5.2.8.
Technical Specification 6.5.2.8 begins: " Audits of unit activities shall be performed under the cognizance of the SRC. These audits shall encompass: ... ."                          MP&L interprets these words as follows:
                                          "The SRC shall review the results of audits (or summaries thereof) of nuclear activities conducted in accordance with the MP&L Operational Quality Assurance Manual. Audits shall be conducted and results (summaries) shall be reviewed in the areas of: ..."
It is MP&L's understanding that the NRC does not choose to allow MP&L or other licensees to modify the Standard Technical Specification wording in 6.5.2.8, but does allow for the above type of interpretation.
Unless notified to the contrary, MP&L intends to implement the stated interpretation (as we have stated) immediately. Further MP&L intends to submit a change in Revision 3 to the MP&L QA Topical Report (MPL-TOP-1A) to state this interpretation and seek " formal" NRC acceptance.
                                                                                                                                    'Bobl 4                              0    hf6 PDR Member Middle South Utilities System
 
s em  g AECM-82/225 Page 2 of 2 Please note this letter in draft form was transmitted to your Messrs.-
Gilrdy and Benedict. They concurred with this wording prior to this formal submittal. We appreciate the cooperation and assistance provided by you and members of your staff in this matter.
Yours truly, T. E. Reaves, Jr.
Manager of Quality Assurance WEE:d1 cc:  Mr. R. B. McGehee Mr. T. B. Conner Mr. N. L. Stampley Mr. A. G. Wagner Mr. J. Gilray Mr. B.-Benedict 0QAM Rev. 3 File 0QAM Holders Manual File File J
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _}}

Latest revision as of 01:11, 27 September 2022

Redirect to:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20079F904&oldid=3509207"