ML20149H867: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
#REDIRECT [[SNRC-1430, Forwards Response to Generic Ltr 88-02 Indicating Interest in Isap II for Plant]]
| number = ML20149H867
| issue date = 02/17/1988
| title = Forwards Response to Generic Ltr 88-02 Indicating Interest in Isap II for Plant
| author name = Leonard J
| author affiliation = LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO.
| addressee name =
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
| docket = 05000322
| license number =
| contact person =
| document report number = GL-88-02, GL-88-2, SNRC-1430, NUDOCS 8802220153
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| page count = 3
}}
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:,              ~ _        _ _    - _ _                  - _._ ._ .    - -        . -
I I
f      w.--  -
l wy
[ggg              _ --_;
LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION j
e.o. sox ss e. NORTH CC',,1TRY RO AD e WADING RIVER. N.Y.11793    ;
[
e>N o. Lt oN am o. Ja                                                                                      ;
vet eens. cent wnian oassated i
SNRC-1430           }
FEB 17 'n                                                                                                    i l
i
['
U.S. Nuclear Pegulatory Commission ATTNr        Document Control Desk Washington, DC                20555                                                                          i i
Submission of Long Island Lighting Company's Response to Generic Letter 88-0.'l Integrated Safety Assessment Program II (ISAP II)
Shoreham Nuclear Power Station - Unit 1                                            [
Docket No. 50-322                                              ,
Gentleman                                                                                                    ;
In accordance with the request contained in Generic Letter Ad-02,                                            j Intecrated Safety Assessment Program II (ISAP II), please find                                                i attached Long Island Lighting Company's response to the ceneric                                              i Letter indicatir.g our interest in the program for the Shoreham                                              !
Nucle.'.r Power Station,                                                                                      i t
If LILCO can be of further assir.tance, please contact us.                                                  3 Very truly yours, i
              .(                ,
{i
{ts y'                        .
Johr. D. Leonard, Jr; j                                                                                      l Vice President - Nuclear Operations
                                                    .<  s                                                                  l MP/TDick                                                                                                      f i
l Attachment                                                                                                    .
l cci R.      Lo/S. Brown                                                                                    l W. T. Russell                                                                                        i F. Crescento                                                                              $04g        j l    !
l    l  !
l 0802220153 880217                                                                                                  :
i FDE        AD0th 050003" P                              DCD
: m.                                                                                    .
 
Attachment - SNRC-1430 Page 1 Integrated Safety Asnessment Program (ISAP) II Response to G4:neric Letter 88-02 Facility Name:                  Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Utility:                        Lc ng Island L3J heingloypany Individual Contact Name:        L. F. Britt                      ____
Phone Number                    (516) 929-6111 An expression of interest will not be considered a commitment to participate en the part of the utility.
WouldyoubeinerestedinparticipatinYir.ISAPT.I?
: 1.                                                                                                    '. f s o ,
in what tima frame?                                            . s.        ,          ,
Response                                                                                        ,,
BasedonourroleintheI.idividualPlant,bramination (IPU '
Program as a test plant, we would need adII.
concerning the ISAP II Program to batter 09,tional informadt,6aluate                                                the beneiite ISAP II vs. IPE. The timing of our participo) ion in 1 SAP II                                                '
would be dependent on receipt of a full poyet license.
I
                                                                  ~
i-                                                                                            l
: 2.      Do you believe that anindust[yh,MRC.shminarconsistingofa                                                                  '
brief discussion by NkC'folicded b/ L question and answer                                                    ,,      , , '
period would be beneficial prior to raking a decisi.cg.'e                                          ,
Response                                        -e
    'e s . This would et.able a utility to make an informed decision as to participation in ICAP II rad provide a means for utilities to exchange or identify conce*ns on.9n industry wide basis.                                                                              .
: 3.      Would you be intorested in a one-on-ene meeting with the NRC todiccussyourparticularfacilityo(rfacilities?
Response                                                                                                                                . <
b Ne believe a one-on-one meeting with the NRC would be necessarn prior to fornslizirg our intent to participate in ISAP II.                                                                7
                                                                        ,'      s                                ,-,  .-
j 'F  i e                            v e
8 '*
M                                *'
m o
t e
h                                    \                      h
 
Attachment - SNRC-1430 Page 2
: 4. If you remain undecided regarding participation, what additional information do you need in order to make a decision?
 
===Response===
Resolution of concerns identified at the industry /NRC seminar should provide us with sufficient information to enable us to determine our level of interest in participating in ISAP II.
: 5. Do you have any potential concerns about participating in ISAP II?
 
===Response===
Our primary concern would be related to duplication of effort between ISAP II and IPE and the resources regiaired to support these programs.
: 6. Do you have any suggestions for program improvements or changes?
 
===Response===
)          We believe it would be beneficial to both the NRC and the nuclear industry if the IPE and ISAP II programs were reviewed, (1) to clarify the goals of each program, (2) to identify areas of commonality, (3) to eliminate any duplication of effort, and, as necessary, (4) to combine these programs into one fully integrated program, h
l}}

Latest revision as of 17:34, 7 August 2022

Redirect to:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20149H867&oldid=3451502"