ML20236N306: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
#REDIRECT [[AECM-87-0139, Application for Amend to License NPF-29,consisting of Tech Spec Changes,Clarifying Secondary Containment Integrity, Changing Name of Organization Represented on Safety Review Committee & Setpoint for Rhr/Rcic Steam Line Flow.Fee Paid]]
| number = ML20236N306
| issue date = 08/06/1987
| title = Application for Amend to License NPF-29,consisting of Tech Spec Changes,Clarifying Secondary Containment Integrity, Changing Name of Organization Represented on Safety Review Committee & Setpoint for Rhr/Rcic Steam Line Flow.Fee Paid
| author name = Kingsley O
| author affiliation = SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
| addressee name =
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
| docket = 05000416
| license number =
| contact person =
| document report number = AECM-87-0139, GL-86-10, NUDOCS 8708110441
| package number = ML20236N309
| document type = OPERATING LICENSES-APPLIATION TO AMEND-RENEW EXISTING, TEXT-LICENSE APPLICATIONS & PERMITS
| page count = 4
| project =
| stage = Request
}}
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:. - - _ _ _ _ - - -
EVEFEM ENERGY REEOtMCEE, INC.
OLMRD KtGsuXJR vgs                                          August 6, 1987 U. S. Nuclear. Regulatory Commission                                                                                                    i Washington,.D. C. 20555                                                                                                                  ,
      . Attention: Document Control Desk Gentlemen:
 
==SUBJECT:==
Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Unit 1                                            -
Docket No. 50-416 License No. NPF-29 Proposed Amendment to the Operating License (PCOL-87/07)
AECM-87/0139 System Energy Resources, Inc. (SERI) is submitting by this letter a proposed amendment to the Grand Gulf Operating License. . Nine items are                                                                j included in this submittal as 1) a clarification to the Secondary Containment                                                          4 Integrity definition; 2) a change in the name of a supporting organization represented on the Safety Review Committee; 3) a nomenclature change for a Secondary Containment isolation valve; 4) a deletion of the manual initiation handswitch calibration requirement for ECCS pumps; 5) a deletion of temporary footnotes; 6) a modification to the Environmental Protection Plan for
      -recordkeeping requirements; 7) a change to reflect new upper containment pool gates; 8) a change to add / relocate certain smoke detectors, and 9) a modification                                                    i to the setpoint for residual heat removal / reactor core isolation: cooling steam line high flow. ' Items one through six are administrative in nature and represent changes to provide consistency with other specifications and to provide clarification.                    Items seven and eight result from proposed design changes to the plant and Item nine corrects an instrument setpoint.
SERI submitted proposed Technical Specification changes in a letter dated                                                        i May_19, 1987 in response to Generic Letter 86-10 " Implementation of Fire Protection Requirements." In that letter, SERI requested deletion of the                                                                >
Technical Specifications related to fire protection. Since NRC review of the May.19, 1987 submittal is not expected to be complete in the near future, changes to the present fire detection instrumentation Technical Specifications
      .(Item eight of this letter) are required to support design change improvements                                                          '
which are scheduled to be worked prior to and during the second refueling outage.
In accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 50.4 and 50.30, the signed original of the requested amendment is enclosed and the appropriate copies will ba distributed. The attachment provides the technical justification and discussion to support the requested amendment. This amendment has been reviewed and accepted by the Plant Safety Review Committee and the Safety                                                  [6k  I I8 3 i
Review Committee.
870811044i e70B06                                                                                                            0g    4 i* 0 PDR    ADOCK050g6                                  m j ma            , mm l
                                                              ~ ~
J16AECM87072201 - 1 l                                                                                                                    - - - - -
 
i F                                                  ,p AECM-87/0139
                                                                                                                                            .,Page 2.
1
                                                              ,                                                                                    1 Basedonthe90idelinespresentedin10CFR50.92)SERIhasiconcluded that this_ proposad amendment involves no significant hazards considerations.
In accordece with the requirements of 10 CFR 170.21, an application fee                                                          '
of^$150 is attached (to this letter.                                                  <-
a
              -SERI requests a response to this letter'for' Item to support 'a. plant modification . schedule durint;,cond                                    therefueling          se]Seven                    by November 6,19 outage.
Work on Item eight of, this letter is scheduled to be completed during the.
second refueling outage. SERI requests that the approved Technical Specification change for Item eight be held until.. issuance is requested based on work schedule progress. The remaining items are not required for.the second refueling outage scheduled to begin November 6, 1997 and can ce processed on a routine schedule.
Your    uly, ODK:bms        ,
                                  .  +              ,
A.;4                                                                .
L Remittance of $150 Application
        ~ Attachments;;J2. Affinnation per 10 CFR 50.30
: 3. GGNS PC0L-87/07                                  >
cc: Mr. T. H. Cloninger (w/a)
Mr. R. B. McGehee (w/a)
Mr. N.~S. Reynolds.(w/a)
Mr. H. L. Thomas (w/o)                                          >
Mr. R. -C. Butcher (w/a)
Dr. J. Nelson Grace, Regional Administrator (w/a)
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
_ Region II 101 Marietta St., N. W.,    Suite t2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323                                                            ><
Mr. L. L. Kintner, Project Manager (w/e)
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regalation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 7920 N
* folk Avenue Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Dr. Alton B. Cobb (w/a)
State Health Officer State Board of Health Box 1700 Jackson, Mississippi 39205 J16AECM87072201 - IJ
_    _.    - ___________a
 
i
  .--' i a
L                                                            BEFORE THE
                                      ' UNITED. STATES-NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Iht l    <
                                                    . LICENSE N'O. NPF-29
                                                      ' DOCKET NO. 50-416 IN THE MATTER OF MISSISSIPPI POWER &' LIGHT COMPANY and
                                              . SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
and SOUTH MISSISSIPPI ELECTRIC POWER ASSOCIATION AFFIRMATION-I, 0. D. Kingsley, Jr. , being duly sworn, . stated .that I am Vice President, Nuclear Operations of System Energy Resources, Inc.; that on behalf of System Energy Resources, Inc., and South Mississippi Electric Power Association I am authorized by System Energy. Resources, Inc. to sign and file with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, this application for amendment of the Operating License of the Grand Gulf Nuclear Station; that I signed this
          -application as Vice President, Nuclear Operations of System Energy Resources,
          .Inc.;:and that the statements made and the matters' set fort herein are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information an                        ef.
                                                                                  ,\                              i.
r.
                                                                              ' O. WKinfsl                                              1 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI COUNTY OF HINDS SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN T0 bef              me, a No    y Public, in and for the
          ' County and State above named, this 6 y day of
                                                                                                                    ,1987.
(SEAL)
                                                                            . E4st -
Notary Public
/          My commission expires:
Ni Commissbr Expires SCP 21e 1987
            -J16AECM87072201        -'4
: 1. PS-86/09          Clarification of SGTS Requirement in Secondary Containment Definition
 
==SUBJECT:==
Technical Specification Definition 1.38.c; page 1-7 DISCUSSION:            It is proposed to change the subject Technical Specification                l definition to "The standby gas treatment system is in compliance with the requirements of Specification 3.6.6.3."
JUSTIFICATION:        The present wording of Definition 1.38 part c allows for inconsistent interpretation. The phrase "0PERABLE pursuant to Specification 3.6.6.3" could mean that both of the standby gas treatment subsystems must be operable for secondary containment integrity to exist. SERI interprets the intent of Definition 1.38, Secondary Containment Integrity to allow compliance with the requirements of Specification 3/4.6.6.3. This allows the plant to be in the Action provisions of Specification 3.6.6.3 and still meet the requirements for Secondary Containment Integrity.
This proposed technical specification change is an administrative change to improve the consistency of the Technical Specification. Other GGNS Technical Specification definitions (1.10.c,1.10.e,1.31.c and 1.31.e) utilize similar terminology. This proposed change is consistent with the BWR Standard Technical Specifications.
SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATIONS:
SERI has evaluated the proposed change and considers it not to involve a significant hazards consideration for the following reasons:
(1) The proposed change will not significantly increase the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated, because the change is strictly administrative in nature and is being made to provide consistency with other Technical Specification definitions and the standard technical specifications.
(2) The proposed change will not create the possibility of a new or different accident from any accident previously evaluated, because there is no physical modification being made to the plant. There is no change in SGTS operating procedures or present plant interpretation which allows secondary containment integrity to exist while under the provisions of Action Statement 3.6.6.3.
(3) The proposed change will not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety, because this change is to provide consistency within the Technical Specifications and does not change the SGTS requirements of Specification 3.6.6.3. or present interpretation of the requirements of Definition 1.38.
J16 MISC 87071304 - 1
                                                                                - __ - __- - _ _ _ _}}

Latest revision as of 14:16, 25 January 2022

Redirect to:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20236N306&oldid=3420151"