ML21083A275: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Docket Nos. EA-20-006 (Enforcement Action) EA-20-007 MEMORANDUM Pursuant to the Boards Order 1 requesting clarification from the parties on the 0F significance of the memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Department of Labor (DOL), the NRC Staff hereby provides its view. | ||
Under the MOU between the NRC and DOL, 2 the practice of both agencies is to 1F coordinate when documents supplied by the other agency are subject to public disclosure. In this case, the Staff had several communications with DOL regarding the release of relevant DOL documents in the Staffs possession that were subject to public disclosure under the Staffs discovery obligations (absent an exemption). The Staff directly informed DOL that the Staff was obligated to publicly disclose this information to comply with its disclosure requirements under 10 C.F.R. § 2.709(a)(6)(i)(A). Further, the Staff informed DOL that, other than home addresses and personal cell phone numbers, it did not identify other information in the documents exempt from disclosure but would consider protecting additional information at DOLs request. DOL neither expressed disagreement with the Staffs determination nor identified additional 1 | |||
Order (Request for Clarification) (Mar. 17, 2021) (ADAMS Accession No. ML21076A244). | |||
2 Notice of Signing of a Revised Memorandum of Understanding Between the NRC and the Department of Labor (DOL), 63 Fed. Reg. 57,324 (Oct. 27, 1998); see Memorandum of Understanding Between NRC and Department of Labor, Employee Protection, 47 Fed. Reg. | |||
54,585 (Dec. 3, 1982); see Nuclear Regulatory Commission Enforcement Manual, Rev. 11, Change 7 § 1.3.14 (Dec. 1, 2020) (ML20329A339). | |||
2 information for withholding, and the Staff subsequently included these documents in its initial public disclosures in this case on February 18, 2021. | |||
The adjudicatory context under which this information was released pursuant to NRCs discovery regulations is distinguishable from a request (and agency response) pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Had the NRC received a FOIA request for these DOL case files, including the settlement agreement, the NRC would have referred such a request for DOLs documents to DOL. However, in the discovery context, and consistent with the NRCs MOU with DOL, the Staff informed DOL that it would publicly disclose the information pursuant to its disclosure responsibilities. | |||
As discussed in the Staffs Answer, it is consistent with NRCs long-standing policy of openness in NRC proceedings and with NRC regulations to provide public access to relevant documents and hold hearings in public. 3 Because the settlement agreement includes 2F information relevant to this case, the Staff publicly disclosed it in compliance with its regulations. | |||
In doing so, the Staff acted in accordance with the NRC MOU with DOL while conducting its responsibilities in an open and transparent manner. | |||
Respectfully submitted, | |||
/Signed (electronically) by/ | |||
Thomas S. Steinfeldt Counsel for NRC Staff Mail Stop: O-14-A44 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Telephone: (301) 415-0034 E-mail: Thomas.Steinfeldt@nrc.gov 3 | |||
NRC Staff Answer to the Tennessee Valley Authoritys Motion Regarding Disclosures (Mar. 11, 2021), | |||
at 11-12 (ML21070A361). | |||
3 Executed in Accord with 10 CFR 2.304(d) | |||
Sara Brock Kirkwood Counsel for NRC Staff Mail Stop: O-14-A44 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Telephone: (301) 287-9187 E-mail: Sara.Kirkwood@nrc.gov Executed in Accord with 10 CFR 2.304(d) | |||
Kevin C. Roach Counsel for NRC Staff Mail Stop: O-14-A44 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Telephone: (201) 521-2078 E-mail: Kevin.Roach@nrc.gov Dated in Washington, DC this 24th day of March 2021 | |||
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY (Enforcement Action) | |||
Docket Nos. EA-20-006 EA-20-007 Certificate of Service Pursuant to 10 C.F.R § 2.305, I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Memorandum, dated March 24, 2021, have been served upon the Electronic Information Exchange (the NRCs E-Filing System), in the captioned proceeding, this 24th day of March 2021. | |||
/Signed (electronically) by/ | |||
Thomas S. Steinfeldt Counsel for NRC Staff Mail Stop: O-14-A44 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Telephone: (301) 415-0034 E-mail: Thomas.Steinfeldt@nrc.gov Dated in Washington, DC this 24th day of March 2021}} | |||
Latest revision as of 19:00, 19 January 2022
| ML21083A275 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | EA-20006, EA-20007 |
| Issue date: | 03/24/2021 |
| From: | Sara Kirkwood, Kevin Roach, Thomas Steinfeldt NRC/OGC |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| SECY RAS | |
| References | |
| 20-006-EA, 20-007-EA, ASLBP 21-969-01-EA-BD01, RAS 56021 | |
| Download: ML21083A275 (4) | |
Text
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Docket Nos. EA-20-006 (Enforcement Action) EA-20-007 MEMORANDUM Pursuant to the Boards Order 1 requesting clarification from the parties on the 0F significance of the memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Department of Labor (DOL), the NRC Staff hereby provides its view.
Under the MOU between the NRC and DOL, 2 the practice of both agencies is to 1F coordinate when documents supplied by the other agency are subject to public disclosure. In this case, the Staff had several communications with DOL regarding the release of relevant DOL documents in the Staffs possession that were subject to public disclosure under the Staffs discovery obligations (absent an exemption). The Staff directly informed DOL that the Staff was obligated to publicly disclose this information to comply with its disclosure requirements under 10 C.F.R. § 2.709(a)(6)(i)(A). Further, the Staff informed DOL that, other than home addresses and personal cell phone numbers, it did not identify other information in the documents exempt from disclosure but would consider protecting additional information at DOLs request. DOL neither expressed disagreement with the Staffs determination nor identified additional 1
Order (Request for Clarification) (Mar. 17, 2021) (ADAMS Accession No. ML21076A244).
2 Notice of Signing of a Revised Memorandum of Understanding Between the NRC and the Department of Labor (DOL), 63 Fed. Reg. 57,324 (Oct. 27, 1998); see Memorandum of Understanding Between NRC and Department of Labor, Employee Protection, 47 Fed. Reg.
54,585 (Dec. 3, 1982); see Nuclear Regulatory Commission Enforcement Manual, Rev. 11, Change 7 § 1.3.14 (Dec. 1, 2020) (ML20329A339).
2 information for withholding, and the Staff subsequently included these documents in its initial public disclosures in this case on February 18, 2021.
The adjudicatory context under which this information was released pursuant to NRCs discovery regulations is distinguishable from a request (and agency response) pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Had the NRC received a FOIA request for these DOL case files, including the settlement agreement, the NRC would have referred such a request for DOLs documents to DOL. However, in the discovery context, and consistent with the NRCs MOU with DOL, the Staff informed DOL that it would publicly disclose the information pursuant to its disclosure responsibilities.
As discussed in the Staffs Answer, it is consistent with NRCs long-standing policy of openness in NRC proceedings and with NRC regulations to provide public access to relevant documents and hold hearings in public. 3 Because the settlement agreement includes 2F information relevant to this case, the Staff publicly disclosed it in compliance with its regulations.
In doing so, the Staff acted in accordance with the NRC MOU with DOL while conducting its responsibilities in an open and transparent manner.
Respectfully submitted,
/Signed (electronically) by/
Thomas S. Steinfeldt Counsel for NRC Staff Mail Stop: O-14-A44 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Telephone: (301) 415-0034 E-mail: Thomas.Steinfeldt@nrc.gov 3
NRC Staff Answer to the Tennessee Valley Authoritys Motion Regarding Disclosures (Mar. 11, 2021),
at 11-12 (ML21070A361).
3 Executed in Accord with 10 CFR 2.304(d)
Sara Brock Kirkwood Counsel for NRC Staff Mail Stop: O-14-A44 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Telephone: (301) 287-9187 E-mail: Sara.Kirkwood@nrc.gov Executed in Accord with 10 CFR 2.304(d)
Kevin C. Roach Counsel for NRC Staff Mail Stop: O-14-A44 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Telephone: (201) 521-2078 E-mail: Kevin.Roach@nrc.gov Dated in Washington, DC this 24th day of March 2021
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY (Enforcement Action)
Docket Nos. EA-20-006 EA-20-007 Certificate of Service Pursuant to 10 C.F.R § 2.305, I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Memorandum, dated March 24, 2021, have been served upon the Electronic Information Exchange (the NRCs E-Filing System), in the captioned proceeding, this 24th day of March 2021.
/Signed (electronically) by/
Thomas S. Steinfeldt Counsel for NRC Staff Mail Stop: O-14-A44 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Telephone: (301) 415-0034 E-mail: Thomas.Steinfeldt@nrc.gov Dated in Washington, DC this 24th day of March 2021