ML21167A142: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:Adopting Risk-informed Decision-making in NRC Licensing Review Culture NRR Office Instruction LIC-206 Ian Tseng PWROG Future Risk-Informed Initiatives Workshop June 21, 2021 1 | ||
The Goal | |||
* To improve the handling and efficiency of NRC review. | |||
The Method | |||
* Increasing adoption of risk-informed decision-making across the NRCs technical staff | |||
* LIC-206 builds off existing NRC framework and long-standing philosophies 2 | |||
The Challenges Solutions | |||
* Reviewers sometimes siloed in separate technical specialties Proactive process to engage relevant technical specialties and promote collaboration as early as possible in a review | |||
* Risk language is diversely presented and dispositioned Provide a common understanding of risk terminology to promote effective collaboration and more reliable conceptual handling by the NRC | |||
* Setting appropriate precedent for first-of-a-kind reviews A consistent intellectual framework for reviewing and documenting risk-informed approaches. | |||
3 | |||
The Challenges Solutions | |||
* Reviewers sometimes siloed in separate technical specialties Proactive process to engage relevant technical specialties and promote collaboration as early as possible in a review | |||
* Risk language is diversely presented and dispositioned Provide a common understanding of risk terminology to promote effective collaboration and more reliable conceptual handling by the NRC | |||
* Setting appropriate precedent for first-of-a-kind reviews A consistent intellectual framework for reviewing and documenting risk-informed approaches 4 | |||
The Challenges Solutions | |||
* Reviewers sometimes siloed in separate technical specialties Proactive process to engage relevant technical specialties and promote collaboration as early as possible in a review | |||
* Risk language is diversely presented and dispositioned Provide a common understanding of risk terminology to promote effective collaboration and more reliable conceptual handling by the NRC | |||
* Setting appropriate precedent for first-of-a-kind reviews A consistent intellectual framework for reviewing and documenting risk-informed approaches 5 | |||
The Challenges Solutions | |||
* Reviewers sometimes siloed in separate technical specialties Proactive process to engage relevant technical specialties and promote collaboration as early as possible in a review | |||
* Risk language is diversely presented and dispositioned Provide a common understanding of risk terminology to promote effective collaboration and more reliable conceptual handling by the NRC | |||
* Setting appropriate precedent for first-of-a-kind reviews A consistent intellectual framework for reviewing and documenting risk-informed approaches 6 | |||
The Challenges Solutions | |||
* Reviewers sometimes siloed in separate technical specialties Proactive process to engage relevant technical specialties and promote collaboration as early as possible in a review | |||
* Risk language is diversely presented and dispositioned Provide a common understanding of risk terminology to promote effective collaboration and more reliable conceptual handling by the NRC | |||
* Setting appropriate precedent for first-of-a-kind reviews A consistent intellectual framework for reviewing and documenting risk-informed approaches 7 | |||
Implementation | |||
* LIC-206 is not a paperwork exercise. The NRC has stood up an active and motivated team to work to acculturate the NRC to the LIC-206 approach and contents. | |||
* Training - Person to person contact to bring the concepts to life and help staff link them to their existing expertise. | |||
* Observation - Real time feedback from within the process to inform training and implementation. | |||
* Metrics - Building the foundation for tracking and monitoring on-going health for long-lasting effect. | |||
8 | |||
Takeaways | |||
* NRR has a new office instruction to promote the practices and culture change needed for expanded use of risk-information in reviews. | |||
* The method builds on existing regulatory framework and methods. | |||
* Implementation is underway. | |||
* We will share more details when they firm up. | |||
9}} |
Latest revision as of 22:51, 18 January 2022
ML21167A142 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Issue date: | 06/21/2021 |
From: | Ian Tseng NRC/NRR/DEX |
To: | |
Vasavada S | |
Shared Package | |
ML21167A163 | List: |
References | |
Download: ML21167A142 (9) | |
Text
Adopting Risk-informed Decision-making in NRC Licensing Review Culture NRR Office Instruction LIC-206 Ian Tseng PWROG Future Risk-Informed Initiatives Workshop June 21, 2021 1
The Goal
- To improve the handling and efficiency of NRC review.
The Method
- Increasing adoption of risk-informed decision-making across the NRCs technical staff
- LIC-206 builds off existing NRC framework and long-standing philosophies 2
The Challenges Solutions
- Reviewers sometimes siloed in separate technical specialties Proactive process to engage relevant technical specialties and promote collaboration as early as possible in a review
- Risk language is diversely presented and dispositioned Provide a common understanding of risk terminology to promote effective collaboration and more reliable conceptual handling by the NRC
- Setting appropriate precedent for first-of-a-kind reviews A consistent intellectual framework for reviewing and documenting risk-informed approaches.
3
The Challenges Solutions
- Reviewers sometimes siloed in separate technical specialties Proactive process to engage relevant technical specialties and promote collaboration as early as possible in a review
- Risk language is diversely presented and dispositioned Provide a common understanding of risk terminology to promote effective collaboration and more reliable conceptual handling by the NRC
- Setting appropriate precedent for first-of-a-kind reviews A consistent intellectual framework for reviewing and documenting risk-informed approaches 4
The Challenges Solutions
- Reviewers sometimes siloed in separate technical specialties Proactive process to engage relevant technical specialties and promote collaboration as early as possible in a review
- Risk language is diversely presented and dispositioned Provide a common understanding of risk terminology to promote effective collaboration and more reliable conceptual handling by the NRC
- Setting appropriate precedent for first-of-a-kind reviews A consistent intellectual framework for reviewing and documenting risk-informed approaches 5
The Challenges Solutions
- Reviewers sometimes siloed in separate technical specialties Proactive process to engage relevant technical specialties and promote collaboration as early as possible in a review
- Risk language is diversely presented and dispositioned Provide a common understanding of risk terminology to promote effective collaboration and more reliable conceptual handling by the NRC
- Setting appropriate precedent for first-of-a-kind reviews A consistent intellectual framework for reviewing and documenting risk-informed approaches 6
The Challenges Solutions
- Reviewers sometimes siloed in separate technical specialties Proactive process to engage relevant technical specialties and promote collaboration as early as possible in a review
- Risk language is diversely presented and dispositioned Provide a common understanding of risk terminology to promote effective collaboration and more reliable conceptual handling by the NRC
- Setting appropriate precedent for first-of-a-kind reviews A consistent intellectual framework for reviewing and documenting risk-informed approaches 7
Implementation
- LIC-206 is not a paperwork exercise. The NRC has stood up an active and motivated team to work to acculturate the NRC to the LIC-206 approach and contents.
- Training - Person to person contact to bring the concepts to life and help staff link them to their existing expertise.
- Observation - Real time feedback from within the process to inform training and implementation.
- Metrics - Building the foundation for tracking and monitoring on-going health for long-lasting effect.
8
Takeaways
- NRR has a new office instruction to promote the practices and culture change needed for expanded use of risk-information in reviews.
- The method builds on existing regulatory framework and methods.
- Implementation is underway.
- We will share more details when they firm up.
9