ML20147F750: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
#REDIRECT [[0CAN028809, Forwards Response to Generic Ltr 88-02, Isap Ii. Program Suggested to Be Coordinated W/Resolution of Severe Accident Issues]]
| number = ML20147F750
| issue date = 02/22/1988
| title = Forwards Response to Generic Ltr 88-02, Isap Ii. Program Suggested to Be Coordinated W/Resolution of Severe Accident Issues
| author name = Howard D
| author affiliation = ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT CO.
| addressee name = Miraglia F
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM), NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION (NRR)
| docket = 05000313, 05000368
| license number =
| contact person =
| document report number = 0CAN028809, CAN28809, GL-88-02, GL-88-2, NUDOCS 8803080026
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| page count = 2
}}
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:z -
ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY February 22, 1988 BCAN028809 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 ATTN:    Mr. Frank J. Miraglia, Jr.
Associate Director for Projects
 
==SUBJECT:==
Arkansas Nuclear One - Units 1 & 2 Docket Nos. 50-313 and 50-368 License Nos. OPR-51 and NPF-6 Integrated Safety Assessment Program II, Generic Letter 88-02
 
==Dear Mr. Miraglia:==
 
The Arkansas Power & Light Company (AP&L) is in receipt of your correspondence of January 20, 1988 (OCNA018810), Generic Letter 88-02 with regard to the Integrated Safety Assessment Program II (ISAP II).
The enclosed information is being provided, as requested by Generic Letter 88-02, to reflect AP&L's interest in ISAP II.
If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact my office.
Very truly yours,
                                                              /
tv Dan R. Howard Manager, Licensing ORH:MTW:lw Enclosure                                                                  p 1
                                                                                  \ \
8803080026 DR        880227 p    ADOCK 05000313 DCD MEMBER MNE COUTH utilities svSTEM
 
      ~.        Integrated Safety Assessment Program (ISAP) II Response Format to Generic Letter 88-02                    l l
Facility Name:    Arkansas Nuclear One (ANO) Units 1 & 2 Utility:    Arkansas Power & Light Company                                        ;
Individual Contact Name: John Smith              Phone Number: (501) 377-5911 As expression of interests will not be considered a commitment to participate on the part of the utility.
: 1. Would you be interested in participating in ISAP II?      If so, in what time frame?
The Arkansas Power & Light Company (AP&L) is currently addressing the use of probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) on ANO Units 1 & 2. Our current schedule is to complete PRAs within 18-24 months. Therefore, participation in an ISAP II program would not begin until that time. We do have an interest in the ISAP II effort, since the program appears to provide a method of obtaining additional benefits from application of PRAs.
: 2. Do you believe that an industry /NRC seminar consisting of a brief discussion by NRC followed by a question and answer period would be beneficial prior to making a decision?
An industry /NRC seminar would be beneficial by providing for an exchange of information regarding ISAP II. The proposed schedule for such a meeting would need to be established significantly enough in advance to accommodate other commitments.
: 3. Would you be interested in a one-on-one meeting with the NRC to discuss your particular facility or facilities?
Such a meeting would be premature at this time, however, might be of interest following the industry /NRC seminar discussed above.
: 4. If you remain undecided regarding participation, what additional information do you need in order to make a decision?
No additional specific information is required at this time, however, questions may arise as a result of our continuing evaluations of PRA related issues.
: 5. Do you have any potential concerns about participating in ISAP II?
No specific concerns have been identified.
: 6. Do you have any suggestions for program improvements or changes?
For utilities currently initiating PRA programs it is suggested that implementation of an ISAP 11 program be closely coordinated with resolution of "severe accident" issues.}}

Latest revision as of 03:16, 12 December 2021

Redirect to:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20147F750&oldid=3363259"