ML20148A954: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML20148A954 | | number = ML20148A954 | ||
| issue date = 09/15/1978 | | issue date = 09/15/1978 | ||
| title = Ack Receipt of | | title = Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Deviations Noted in QA Program Insp Rept 99900526/78-01.Requests Addl Info Re Corrective Actions Re QA Records & on-the-job Training Program within 30 Days | ||
| author name = Potapovs U | | author name = Potapovs U | ||
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) | | author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| case reference number = REF-QA-99900526 | | case reference number = REF-QA-99900526 | ||
| document report number = NUDOCS 7810310011 | | document report number = NUDOCS 7810310011 | ||
| title reference date = 09-07-1978 | |||
| package number = ML20148A937 | | package number = ML20148A937 | ||
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO ENGINEERING/CONSTRUCTION/CONSULTING FIRM, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE | | document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO ENGINEERING/CONSTRUCTION/CONSULTING FIRM, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE | ||
| Line 22: | Line 23: | ||
+/ 15 SEP 1978 f | +/ 15 SEP 1978 f | ||
Docket No. 99900526/78-01 Black & Veatch Consulting Engineers Attn: Mr. R. D. Woodsen Head, Power Division Post Office Box 8495 Kansas City, Missouri 64114 Gentlemen: | Docket No. 99900526/78-01 Black & Veatch Consulting Engineers Attn: Mr. R. D. Woodsen Head, Power Division Post Office Box 8495 Kansas City, Missouri 64114 Gentlemen: | ||
Thank you for your letter of September 7,1978, in response to our letter dated August 15, 1978. As a result of our review, we find that additional information, as discussed with your Mr. R. E. Blaisdell during a telephone call on September 13, 1978, is needed. The additional information necessary is summarized as follows: | Thank you for your letter of September 7,1978, in response to our {{letter dated|date=August 15, 1978|text=letter dated August 15, 1978}}. As a result of our review, we find that additional information, as discussed with your Mr. R. E. Blaisdell during a telephone call on September 13, 1978, is needed. The additional information necessary is summarized as follows: | ||
~ ~ | ~ ~ | ||
I Response B: A description of the actions that will be taken based on the results of the investigation scheduled for completion . | I Response B: A description of the actions that will be taken based on the results of the investigation scheduled for completion . | ||
Revision as of 00:37, 12 December 2021
| ML20148A954 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 09/15/1978 |
| From: | Potapovs U NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Woodson R BLACK & VEATCH |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20148A937 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900526 NUDOCS 7810310011 | |
| Download: ML20148A954 (1) | |
Text
UNITED STATES g Efooq'o g* NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g [ n REClONIV 5 g 611 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE. suite 1000
- 2 ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011 j
+/ 15 SEP 1978 f
Docket No. 99900526/78-01 Black & Veatch Consulting Engineers Attn: Mr. R. D. Woodsen Head, Power Division Post Office Box 8495 Kansas City, Missouri 64114 Gentlemen:
Thank you for your letter of September 7,1978, in response to our letter dated August 15, 1978. As a result of our review, we find that additional information, as discussed with your Mr. R. E. Blaisdell during a telephone call on September 13, 1978, is needed. The additional information necessary is summarized as follows:
~ ~
I Response B: A description of the actions that will be taken based on the results of the investigation scheduled for completion .
on October 30, 1978.
The scope and salient points of the on-the-job training that was accomplished, and how this training was documented.
The tentative schedule for internal audits in the areas of document control and QA r .ords.
Response C: Describe how the "QA Group instructions" are related to the
, formalized program of the Quality Assurance Program-Nuclear.
Please provide this additional information within twenty (20) days in order that we may complete our review in a timely manner.
Sincerely, 1 I, r t
j hk(% e-Uldis Potapovs, C ie Vendor Inspection Branch a
L
. - - , _ . _ - .