CLI-97-11, NRC Staff Response to Cant Motion to Reconsider CLI-97-11.* Staff Opposes Cant 970905 Motion to Reconsider CLI-97-11 & to Grant Petition for Review of LBP-97-3.Motion Deemed Premature by Staff.W/Certificate of Svc: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
#REDIRECT [[CLI-97-11, Staff Proposed Findings Addressing Issue in Commission Remand Order CLI-97-11.* Foregoing Considerations Show Values Chosen by Staff in Feis Analysis Were Reasonable. W/Certificate of Svc]]
| number = ML20216K095
| issue date = 09/12/1997
| title = NRC Staff Response to Cant Motion to Reconsider CLI-97-11.* Staff Opposes Cant 970905 Motion to Reconsider CLI-97-11 & to Grant Petition for Review of LBP-97-3.Motion Deemed Premature by Staff.W/Certificate of Svc
| author name = Bachmann R
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC)
| addressee name =
| addressee affiliation = NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
| docket = 07003070
| license number =
| contact person =
| case reference number = CON-#397-18499
| document report number = CLI-97-11, LBP-97-03, LBP-97-3, ML, NUDOCS 9709190014
| document type = LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS, PLEADINGS
| page count = 4
}}
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.                      .      ..        _.
  #fH DOCKETED USNRC September 12, 1997 W EP 15 A9:39 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA                            jkI;% NFp O[FFICli        OF SECR NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE COMMISSION In the Matter of                            )
                                                  )
LOUISIANA ENERGY SERVICES, L.P. )                  Docket No. 70-3070-ML
                                                  )
(Claiborne Enrichment Center)                )
NRC STAFF RESPONSE TO CITIZENS AGAINST NUCLEAR TRASH'S MOTION TO RECONSIDER CLI 97-11 On September 5,1997, Intervenor Citizens Against Nuclear Trash (CANT) filed
      " Citizens Against Nuclear Trash's Motion to Reconsider CLI 97 Il and Grant CANT's Petition for Review of LBP-97 3" (Motion), The Staff opposes the Motion.
Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. I 2.786, filings such as CANT's Motion are not provided for.
Specifically,10 C.F.R. I 2.786(e) specifies the only circumstance when petitions for reconsideration of Commission decisions will be entenained, i.e., when the Commission has issued a decision after review. Section 2.786(e) prohibits petitions for reconsideration of a Commission decision to grant or deny petitions for review. Since the Commission has not fD [ DOCK        07 03 70 C                      PDR                                                                    =
j
 
2-even decided whether to grant CANT's petition with regard to LBp 97 3, CANT's biotion is decidedly premature. The hiotion should be denied 8 Respectfully submitted Richard G. Bachmann                            -'
Counsel for NRC Staff Dated at Rockville, biaryland this 12th day of September,1997
                ' In a pleading entitled " Applicant's Supplemental Opposition to CANT's biotion to Reconsider" dated September 12,1997, the Applicant made several suggestions to the Commission. The Staff does not intend to respond to this filing.
I
 
P UNITED STATES OF AMERICA                      fg gk NO. LEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE TIIE COMMISSION                VI SEP 15 A9:39 In the Matter of                                  )              OFFl@ OF SECRO AR'r
                                                      )                RUlli N NCJ *D LOUISIANA ENERGY SERVICES, L.P.                    )      Docket M)JWIID70'M6 STAFF
                                                      )
(Claiborne Enrichment Center)                      )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE l  1 hereby certify that copies of "NRC STAFF RESPONSE TO CITIZEN'S AGAINST NUCLEAR TRASil'S MOTION TO RECONSIDER CLI-97 ll" in the above captioned proceeding have been served on the following through deposit in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's internal mail system, or by deposit in the United States mall, first class, as indicated by an asterisk this 12th day of September,1997:
Thomas S. Moore, Chairman                      Richard F. Cole Administrative Judge                            Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board              Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission            U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Conunission Washington, DC 20555                          Washington, DC 20555                  ,
Frederick J. Shon                              Mr. Ronald Wascom*
Administrative Judge                            Deputy Assistant Secretary Atomic Safety and Licensing Board              Office of Air Quality &
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                  Radiation Protection Washington, DC 20555                          P.O. Box 82135 Baton Rouge, LA 70884 2135 J. Michael McGarry, III. Esq.*                Peter I.xRoy*
Winston & Strawn                              Duke Engineering & Services, Inc.
1400 L Street, N.W.                            P.O. Box 1004 Washington, DC 20005                          Charlotte, NC 28201 1004 Dr. W. Iloward Arnold
* Marcus A. Rowden, Esq.*
Ieuisiana Energy Services, L.P.                Fried, Frank, Ilarris 2600 Virginia Avenue, N.W.                      Shriver & Jacobsen Suite 608                                      1101 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20037                          Suite 900 South Washington, DC 200(M j
 
2-Office of the Commission Appellate                  Office of the Secretary Adjudication                                      ATTN: Rulemakings and Adjudications Mall Stop: 16 C 15 OWFN                              Staff U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                  U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555                                Washington, DC 20555 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board                  Nathalle M. Walker, Esq.*
Panel                                          Sierra Club legal Defense Fund U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                  400 Magazine Street, Ste. 401 Washington, DC 20555                                New Orleans, LA 70130 Diane Curran, Esq.*                                Joseph DiStefano, Esq.*
liarmon, Curran, Gallagher & Spielberg              Urenco Investments, Inc.
2001 S Street. N.W., Suite 430                      Suite 610 Washitigton, D.C. 20009 1125                        2600 Virginia Ave., N.W.
Washington. DC 20037 David S. Bailey, Esq.*
Thomas J. llenderson, Esq.
Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law 1450 0 Street N.W., Ste. 400 Washington, DC 20005
                                                          ,P"      M!
Richard G. Bachmann Counsel for NRC Staff 5
i
                                                                                                                                . . . _ , . . . , .}}

Revision as of 13:14, 8 December 2021

Redirect to:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=CLI-97-11,_NRC_Staff_Response_to_Cant_Motion_to_Reconsider_CLI-97-11.*_Staff_Opposes_Cant_970905_Motion_to_Reconsider_CLI-97-11_%26_to_Grant_Petition_for_Review_of_LBP-97-3.Motion_Deemed_Premature_by_Staff.W/Certificate_of_Svc&oldid=3338607"