ML20213F250: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML20213F250 | | number = ML20213F250 | ||
| issue date = 11/07/1986 | | issue date = 11/07/1986 | ||
| title = Ack Receipt of | | title = Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Nonconformance & Violation Noted in QA Program Insp Rept 99901039/85-01.Responses to Violation 85-01-02 & Nonconformance Inadequate | ||
| author name = Heishman R | | author name = Heishman R | ||
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) | | author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| case reference number = REF-QA-99901039 | | case reference number = REF-QA-99901039 | ||
| document report number = NUDOCS 8611140103 | | document report number = NUDOCS 8611140103 | ||
| title reference date = 06-02-1986 | |||
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO VENDOR/MANUFACTURER, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE | | document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO VENDOR/MANUFACTURER, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE | ||
| page count = 2 | | page count = 2 | ||
| Line 26: | Line 27: | ||
***** November 7, 1936 Docket No. 99901039/85-01 Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc. | ***** November 7, 1936 Docket No. 99901039/85-01 Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc. | ||
ATTN: Edward A. Fullin Vice President, General Manager Post Office Box 8000-A Chicago, Illincis 60680 Gentlemen: | ATTN: Edward A. Fullin Vice President, General Manager Post Office Box 8000-A Chicago, Illincis 60680 Gentlemen: | ||
Thank you for your letter of June 2,1986, in response to our letter dated February 8,1986. We have reviewed your reply and find that additional information is needed. Due to administrative oversight our review of your response was delayed. Your response to Violation B (85-01-02) addressed neither corrective nor preventive measures taken regarding the failure to impose the requirements of 10 CFR Part 21 on your subtier vendors, when 10 CFR Part 21 was imposed on you. For example, it appears from your response that the Charles C. Kawin Company has not been advised that it performed mechanical and chemical testing on material ultimately destined for nuclear service. Further, we find no indication of administrative steps taken to ensure such subtier procurement documents will in the future impose 10 CFR Part 21 when required. | Thank you for your letter of June 2,1986, in response to our {{letter dated|date=February 8, 1986|text=letter dated February 8,1986}}. We have reviewed your reply and find that additional information is needed. Due to administrative oversight our review of your response was delayed. Your response to Violation B (85-01-02) addressed neither corrective nor preventive measures taken regarding the failure to impose the requirements of 10 CFR Part 21 on your subtier vendors, when 10 CFR Part 21 was imposed on you. For example, it appears from your response that the Charles C. Kawin Company has not been advised that it performed mechanical and chemical testing on material ultimately destined for nuclear service. Further, we find no indication of administrative steps taken to ensure such subtier procurement documents will in the future impose 10 CFR Part 21 when required. | ||
The corrective action taken as a result of Nonconformance A (85-01-03) does not address the issue that is central to this finding. That is: your proce-dures do not address how sheet steel (with the exception of High Strength Low Alloy and 4130 A0) will be marked or otherwise identified. Please provide your corrective action to ensure sheet steel will be marked, tagged, or otherwise identified in cases where surface or edge marking is impractical. | The corrective action taken as a result of Nonconformance A (85-01-03) does not address the issue that is central to this finding. That is: your proce-dures do not address how sheet steel (with the exception of High Strength Low Alloy and 4130 A0) will be marked or otherwise identified. Please provide your corrective action to ensure sheet steel will be marked, tagged, or otherwise identified in cases where surface or edge marking is impractical. | ||
Your response to all other findings is considered acceptable. We will verify implementation of corrective and preventive measures in a future inspection. | Your response to all other findings is considered acceptable. We will verify implementation of corrective and preventive measures in a future inspection. | ||
Latest revision as of 23:18, 4 May 2021
| ML20213F250 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 11/07/1986 |
| From: | Heishman R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
| To: | Mullin E JOSEPH T. RYERSON & SON, INC. |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99901039 NUDOCS 8611140103 | |
| Download: ML20213F250 (2) | |
Text
~
-4
.~ 4 N
!( p rooq[o) ,
g UNITED STATES NUCLEAR RECULATORY COMMISSION g WASF INGTON, D. C. 20S55
-l
.o
- November 7, 1936 Docket No. 99901039/85-01 Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc.
ATTN: Edward A. Fullin Vice President, General Manager Post Office Box 8000-A Chicago, Illincis 60680 Gentlemen:
Thank you for your letter of June 2,1986, in response to our letter dated February 8,1986. We have reviewed your reply and find that additional information is needed. Due to administrative oversight our review of your response was delayed. Your response to Violation B (85-01-02) addressed neither corrective nor preventive measures taken regarding the failure to impose the requirements of 10 CFR Part 21 on your subtier vendors, when 10 CFR Part 21 was imposed on you. For example, it appears from your response that the Charles C. Kawin Company has not been advised that it performed mechanical and chemical testing on material ultimately destined for nuclear service. Further, we find no indication of administrative steps taken to ensure such subtier procurement documents will in the future impose 10 CFR Part 21 when required.
The corrective action taken as a result of Nonconformance A (85-01-03) does not address the issue that is central to this finding. That is: your proce-dures do not address how sheet steel (with the exception of High Strength Low Alloy and 4130 A0) will be marked or otherwise identified. Please provide your corrective action to ensure sheet steel will be marked, tagged, or otherwise identified in cases where surface or edge marking is impractical.
Your response to all other findings is considered acceptable. We will verify implementation of corrective and preventive measures in a future inspection.
Please provide us a description of your corrective and preventive actions, and their effective dates, to Violation B (85-01-02) and Nonconformance A (85-01-03).
l Since this request affects fewer than 10 respondents, an OMB clearance is not i required in accordance with PL 96-511.
l Sincercly, ,
./ ll Fr- Robert F. Heishman, Chief Vendor Program Branch Division of Quality Assurance, Vendor and Technical Training Center Programs Office of Inspection and Enforcement 861114o103 861107 -
PDR OA999 EMVJTRYI 6h j 99901039 PDR &
l
. N Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc. flovember 7,1986 DISTDIBUTION:
09 r DM8:17':" VPPiteadihg~~i 00AVT Reading JTaylor RStarostecki BGrimes HMiller RFHeishman EWMerschoff EHTrottier
- see previous page for concurrence VPB:00AVT* SC/VPB:00AVT* F 00AVT EHTrottier: sam EWMerschoff -
eishman 10/31/86 11/5/86 W1/ 7/86