DD-86-17, Responds to 10CFR2.206 Petition Seeking Issuance of Order to Show Cause Why OL Should Not Be Suspended or Terminated for Alleged Emergency Planning Deficiencies.Encl Director'S Decision DD-86-17 Indicates Why Petition Denied: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
#REDIRECT [[DD-86-17, Advises That Time for Commission to Review Director'S Decision DD-86-17 Expired.Commission Declined Review. Decision Became Final Agency Action on 861215.Served on 861222]]
| number = ML20214H532
| issue date = 11/19/1986
| title = Responds to 10CFR2.206 Petition Seeking Issuance of Order to Show Cause Why OL Should Not Be Suspended or Terminated for Alleged Emergency Planning Deficiencies.Encl Director'S Decision DD-86-17 Indicates Why Petition Denied
| author name = Taylor J
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
| addressee name = Northrop D, Sigler S
| addressee affiliation = AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
| docket = 05000346
| license number =
| contact person =
| document report number = 2.206, DD-86-17, NUDOCS 8611260444
| package number = ML20214H517
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO PUBLIC ENTITY/CITIZEN/ORGANIZATION/MEDIA, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| page count = 2
}}
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.-
t Novemb;r 19, ~ 1986 D:cket N2. 50-346 David E. Northrep, Esq.                      -
Sharon Sigler, Esq.
Assistant Attorney General 30 E. Broad St.
Columbus, OH 43266-0410
 
==Dear Mr. .Northrop and Ms. Sigler:==
 
This is in response to a Petition pursuant to 10 CFR 62.206 dated October 24, 1986 wherein the Attorney General on behalf of the State of Ohio sought that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission institute proceedings to suspend the oper-ating license of the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station of the Toledo Edison Company in light of alleged deficiencies in the area of offsite emergency planning.      The    Petition further sought that the Commission keep the Davis-Besse facility shut down pending resolution of the alleged deficiencies.
The Petition noted that the Governor of the State of Ohio had withdrawn his support for the evacuation plans for the Davis-Besse facility and had further created tbn Ohio Emergency Evacuation Review Team (EERT) to conduct an evalu-ation of the evacuation plans currently in place.                The Petition alleges that the EERT has found serious deficiencies in the plan.                      The Petition further alleges that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has not issued any formal statement concerning the adequacy of eraergency planning for the Davis-Besse facility and that,        consequently, the NRC has not and cannot make required findings as to adequacy of offsite emergency preparedness for that facility.
For the reasons set forth in the enclosed " Director's Decision Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.205,",    DD-86-17, the Petition has been denied. A copy of the enclosed Director's Decision will be referred to the Secretary for the Commission's review in accordance with 10 CFR 2.206(c).
Sincerely,                    -
Original signed Bf5 James M.Ta#
James M. Taylor, Director Office of Inspection and Infercement
 
==Enclosures:==
: 1. Director's Decision
: 2. Federal Register Notice cc: w/enclos. Toledo Edison Company              DISTRIBUTION:      See next page ebe      MMb 11//9/86 EPB/IE              IE          /IE              EEd/IE(
7              d ER/IE DDVIE RAMeck:sc      . R an Niel    B atthews    Schwartz        LJordan      RWStarosteck'    a lor 11//9 /86    11/U1/86      11//g /86    11/f1/86          11/L /86      11/n/86      11/p/86
                                                                                                            /
91 8611260444 DR            861119 ADOCK 05000346 PDR
 
DISTRIBUTION:
MMalsch, DGC                                  CRVan Niel, IE CENorelius, RIII                              FKantor, IE HRDenton, NRR                                  RAMeck, IE EChristenbury, OGC                            EDO - 2264 JKeppler, RIII                                CDeliso, IE 86-621 BBerson, RIII                                MLReardon, IE WShafer, RIII              L OCS_.s - -
ADeAgazio, NRR                              DEPER R/F JMTaylor, IE                                  EPB R/F RWStarostecki, IE                            JGDavis, NMSS JGPar,tiow, IE                                JResner, PPM 6 BKGrimes, IE                                PDR ELJordan, IE                                LPDR SASchwartz, IE DBMatthews, IE KEPerkins, IE      -
JAAxelrad, IE RKHoefling, 0GC 4
I t
4
                - -        , , . , - - - - - - - - , - - - ,            -. - --  - ------.-- , m--.-----, - -. ----,..- - - - -}}

Latest revision as of 13:15, 19 April 2021

Redirect to:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=DD-86-17,_Responds_to_10CFR2.206_Petition_Seeking_Issuance_of_Order_to_Show_Cause_Why_OL_Should_Not_Be_Suspended_or_Terminated_for_Alleged_Emergency_Planning_Deficiencies.Encl_Director%27S_Decision_DD-86-17_Indicates_Why_Petition_Denied&oldid=3236478"