05000335/FIN-2015001-01: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by Mark Hawes) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| identified by = NRC | | identified by = NRC | ||
| Inspection procedure = IP 71152 | | Inspection procedure = IP 71152 | ||
| Inspector = C Fontana, E Stamm, J Reyes, J Rivera | | Inspector = C Fontana, E Stamm, J Reyes, J Rivera-Ortiz, S Sanchez, T Morrissey, B Cecere | ||
| CCA = H.9 | | CCA = H.9 | ||
| INPO aspect = CL.4 | | INPO aspect = CL.4 | ||
| description = The inspectors identified a Green non-cited violation of 10 CFR 50.65, Requirements for Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants, paragraph (a)(4), for the licensees failure to conduct adequate risk assessments prior to performing surveillance testing on the emergency core cooling system (ECCS). Consequently, ECCS surveillance testing was completed while the unit was in a Green online risk configuration when the risk should have been elevated to Yellow. Corrective actions completed included implementing instructions via an Operations Standing Order to declare any system, structure or component unavailable when it is declared inoperable unless an assessment is completed to show that operator actions can restore the safety function before it is needed. The licensees failure to implement the online risk assessment program as required by ADM- 17.16, Implementation of the Configuration Risk Management Program, was a performance deficiency (PD). Specifically, in each of the three examples identified by the inspectors, the plants online risk was reclassified from Green to Yellow when properly assessed as established by the licensees online risk monitor (OLRM). The inspectors determined that the PD was more than minor because it adversely affected the equipment performance attribute of the Mitigating Systems Cornerstone. Specifically, the failure to identify increases in operational risk and implement risk management actions adversely affected the reliability of those systems relied upon to respond to plant events. The finding was determined to be of very low safety significance (Green) because for each instance, the Incremental Core Damage Probability Deficit for the timeframe the ECCS was unavailable was less than 1E-6. The inspectors determined that the finding had a cross-cutting aspect of Training in the Human Performance area, because the control room operators did not have adequate risk insight guidance and an adequate understanding regarding use of operator actions to take credit for safety function availability, causing incorrect application of the on-line risk monitoring tool [H.9]. | | description = The inspectors identified a Green non-cited violation of 10 CFR 50.65, Requirements for Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants, paragraph (a)(4), for the licensees failure to conduct adequate risk assessments prior to performing surveillance testing on the emergency core cooling system (ECCS). Consequently, ECCS surveillance testing was completed while the unit was in a Green online risk configuration when the risk should have been elevated to Yellow. Corrective actions completed included implementing instructions via an Operations Standing Order to declare any system, structure or component unavailable when it is declared inoperable unless an assessment is completed to show that operator actions can restore the safety function before it is needed. The licensees failure to implement the online risk assessment program as required by ADM- 17.16, Implementation of the Configuration Risk Management Program, was a performance deficiency (PD). Specifically, in each of the three examples identified by the inspectors, the plants online risk was reclassified from Green to Yellow when properly assessed as established by the licensees online risk monitor (OLRM). The inspectors determined that the PD was more than minor because it adversely affected the equipment performance attribute of the Mitigating Systems Cornerstone. Specifically, the failure to identify increases in operational risk and implement risk management actions adversely affected the reliability of those systems relied upon to respond to plant events. The finding was determined to be of very low safety significance (Green) because for each instance, the Incremental Core Damage Probability Deficit for the timeframe the ECCS was unavailable was less than 1E-6. The inspectors determined that the finding had a cross-cutting aspect of Training in the Human Performance area, because the control room operators did not have adequate risk insight guidance and an adequate understanding regarding use of operator actions to take credit for safety function availability, causing incorrect application of the on-line risk monitoring tool [H.9]. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 19:52, 20 February 2018
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
|---|---|
| Report | IR 05000335/2015001 Section 4OA2 |
| Date counted | Mar 31, 2015 (2015Q1) |
| Type: | NCV: Green |
| cornerstone | Mitigating Systems |
| Identified by: | NRC identified |
| Inspection Procedure: | IP 71152 |
| Inspectors (proximate) | C Fontana E Stamm J Reyes J Rivera-Ortiz S Sanchez T Morrissey B Cecere |
| Violation of: | 10 CFR 50.65 |
| CCA | H.9, Training |
| INPO aspect | CL.4 |
| ' | |