ML20134H443: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
#REDIRECT [[IR 05000629/2007026]]
| number = ML20134H443
| issue date = 08/14/1985
| title = Notice of Violation from Insp on 850629-0726
| author name =
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
| addressee name =
| addressee affiliation =
| docket = 05000321, 05000366
| license number =
| contact person =
| document report number = 50-321-85-22, 50-366-85-22, NUDOCS 8508280417
| package number = ML20134H439
| document type = NOTICE OF VIOLATION OF A REGULATION, TEXT-INSPECTION & AUDIT & I&E CIRCULARS
| page count = 2
}}
See also: [[see also::IR 05000629/2007026]]
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.
.
        '
  .
                                            ENCLOSURE 1
                                        NOTICE OF VIOLATION
                                                                                            *
      Georgia Power Company                              " Docket Nos. 50-321 and 50-366
      Hatch 1 and 2                                        License Nos. DPR-57 and NPF-5 ,
      The following violations were identified during an inspection conducted on
      June 29 - JJ1y 26, 1985.    The. Severity Levels were assigned in accordance with
      the NRC Enforcement Policy (10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C).
      1.  10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion X, as implemented by Section A.33 of the
            Hatch Unit 2 FSAR, requires the licensee to comply with ANSI N18.7-1976.
            Section 5.2.7 of ANSI N18.7-1976 specifies that maintenance and modifi-
            cations which may affect functioning of safety-related systems be performed
            in a manner to ensure quality at least equivalent to that specified in
            original design bases and requirements. It also specifies that a suitable
            level of confidence in systems on which maintenance or modifications have
            been performed shall be attained by appropriate inspection.
            Contrary to the above, the bypass valve (2E11-F1228) for the residual heat
            removal system check valve (2E11-F0508) was found not to contain all of its
            internal parts when opened on April 10, 1985. This bypass valve had been
            disassembled during the 1984 Unit 2 outage and no documented work had been
            performed on 2E11-F122B since that outage and prior to April 10, 1985.
            This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I) for Unit 2 only.
      2.  Technical Specification 6.8.1.C requires that written procedures .be
            implemented and maintained covering surveillance and test activities of
            safety-related equipment.
            Contrary to the above, the following safety-related calibration procedures
            incorrectly referenced the filing codes, which are used to locate vendor
            technical manuals in the site document room:
            a.    HNP-1-5251, Revision 11, and HNP-2-5251, Revision 5, General Electric
                  Type 547 Self Synchronizing Manual / Automatic Transfer Station.
            b.    HNP-2-5255, Revision 2, GE 562 Limiter Calibration.
            c.    HNP-2-5273, Revision 6, Model 195-4 Mercoid Level Switch,
            d.    HNP-1-5261, Revision 16, Agastat Timing Relay Calibration.
            This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement I) for Units 1 and 2.
  C508280417 850814
  PDR    ADOCK 05000321
  0                  PDR
 
                                                  ___              _
t    .-
t -
          *
    .
        Georgia Power Company                    2            Docket Nos. 50-321 and 50-366
        Hatch 1 and 2                                          License Nos. DPR-57 and NPF-5
        Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this office within 30
        days of the date of this Nott'ce, a written statement or explanation in reply,
        including: (1) admission or denial of the alleged violations; (2) the reasons
        for the violations if admitted; (3) the corrective steps which have been taken
        and the results achieved; (4) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid          ,
                                                                                                  '
        further violations; and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
        Security or. safeguards information should be submitted as an enclosure to
        facilitate withholding it from public disclosure as required by 10 CFR 2.790(d)
        or 10 CFR 73.21.
                    AUG 141985
        Date:
l
l
\
                                                                                                ,
r
l
l
!
                                    . - _ . . _ -    .  . _ -      _ . .
}}

Latest revision as of 19:31, 25 September 2020