ML20134F039: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
(No difference)

Revision as of 14:36, 2 July 2020

Staff Requirements Memo Re SECY-96-248, Proposed Rule on Changes to Nuclear Power Plant Security Requirements, 10CFR73. Commission Has Approved Publication of Proposed Rulemaking W/Listed Changes
ML20134F039
Person / Time
Issue date: 01/29/1997
From: Hoyle J
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
To: Thompson H
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
References
REF-10CFR9.7 SECY-96-248-C, NUDOCS 9702070233
Download: ML20134F039 (1)


Text

- - ._

?

encu UNITED STATES

[ 'o NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMISSION

!' n W ASHINGTON. D.C. 20555 E

$ ;J '

s January 29, 1997 OFFICE OF THE SECRET ARY Hugh L. Thompson, Jr.

Ac n Ex cutive Director for Operations MEMORANDUM TO:

(.A - -

Jo C. le, Secretary FROM:

SUBJECT:

AFF REQUIREMENTS - SECY-96-248 - PROPOSED RULE ON CHANGES TO NUCLEAR POWER PLANT SECURITY REQUIREMENTS, 10 CFR PART 73 The Commission has approved publication of the proposed rulemaking with the changes noted below.

1.

The proposed rule should be changed least quarterlyto permit vitalofarea instead access list The reapproval at staff should also include a question in the annually. regarding the benefits of proposed rule for comment separating the update and re-approval requirements.

(A), on

2. The following sentence should be added to paragraphThe licensee shall page 18 of the Federal Reaister notice: include on the acces duties require access to vital areas during nonemergency  !

conditions.

(SECY Suspense: 2/28/97)

(EDO) i cc: Chairman Jackson Commissioner Rogers Commissioner Dicus Commissioner Diaz Commissioner McGaffigan OGC OCA OIG lO Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ACNW, ASLBP (via E-Mail)

THIS SRM, SECY-96-248, AND THE COMMISSION VOTING SECY NOTE:

RECORD CONTAINING THE VOTE SHEETS OF ALL COMMISSIONERS WILL BE MADE PUBLICLY AVAILAB WORKING DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS SRM.

970207d233 970129 PDR 10CFR PT9.7 PDR

-