ML20091P963

Forwards Performance Data for FFD Program for Jan-June 1995, Per 10CFR26.71(d)

ML20091P963
Person / Time
Site:	Peach Bottom, Limerick
Issue date:	08/28/1995
From:	Hunger G PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 9509050105
Download: ML20091P963 (19)

Text

-

.. - . . - - . . _ - .m ._, .. ___.m _

Ctation support Department

~

• 10CFR29.71(d) v Zi Jr!! =;L,,, .

PECO ENERGY 965 chesterbrook Boulevard Wayne. PA 19057-5691

. August 28,1995 Docket Nos. 50-277 50-278 50-352 i 50-353 License Nos. DPR-44 .;

DPR-56 NPF-39 NPF-85  ;

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk '

Washington, DC 20555

SUBJECT:

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Unitt,2 and 3 Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 Fitness-for-Duty Program Performance Data for

. the Period January 1995 through June 1995 l Gentlemen:

As required by 10CFR26.71(d), this letter submits the performance data for our Fitness-for-Duty (FFD) program for the period January 1995 througn June 1995. The data for our Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS), Units 2 and 3, and Limerick Generating Station (LGS), Units 1 and 2, sites are provided in Attachments 1 and 2. Data for our Corporate Office and Nuclear Group r

Headquarters specimen collection sites (i.e., 2301 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA, and 955 65

' Chesterbrook Boulevard, Wayne, PA, respectively) are provided in Attachment 3.

The data are reported on the January 1992 revision of the FFD Performance Data form provided by the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI), formerly the Nuclear Management and Resources Council

- (NUMARC), and include the following.

- Drugs tested for and cut-off levels.

- Workforce population tested.

- Numbers of tests and results by population and type of test (i.e, pre-access, for-cause landom, follow-up, and other types of tests).

- Substances identified.  ;

t

- - g ,, n ..

L GdeU d- l t

i 9509050105 950828

~" ff0 k ig l .PDR ADOCK 05000277 ,s I

..; R _..._ 2 _ PDR _ ,

.-_ __ - __=- - _ ____ _

August 28,1995

- Page 2 J

Attachments 1, 2, and 3 also include the following.

- A summary of management actions.

~

- Analysis of the data and appropriate actions that have been taken.

- Random testing rate.

During this period, there was one (1) significant event reported to the NRC in accordance with i 10CFR26.73, as described in Attachment 2 of this letter.

4 If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact us.

Very truly yours, Ad, ,

G. A. Hunger, Jr.,

Director - Licensing 6

Attachments cc: T. T. Martin, Administrator, Region I, USNRC (w/ attachments)

W. L Schmidt, USNRC Senior Resident inspector, PBAPS (w/ attachments)

N. S. Perry, USNRC Senior Resident inspector, LGS (w/ attachments)

I A

e 4

ATTACHMENT 1 .

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Units 2 and 3 Fitness-for-Duty Performance Data January 1995 through June 1995 i

l l

1

~

Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data

, Personnel Subject to 10CFR 26

T Peco Energy Company  % g g71995 Company 6 Monma Ending Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Locason I

David M. Sarley (215) 841-5703 -

Can'a= fJame Phone Ondude area code)

.3 , "

Cutoffs: Screen / Confirmation (ng/ml) O Appendix A to 10CFR 26 Mariju:.na 50 / 15 Amphetamines '1000 / *500 /

Cocaine 300 / 150 Phencyclidine 25

/ 25 /

Opiates 300 / 300 Alcohol (% BAC) 0.'04 /

Long-Term Short-Term Testing Results Licensee Employees Contractor Personnel

~

Contractor Personnel

, Avercge Number witt-Unescorted Access 2523 ,

1648 Catego.'es Tested Positive Tested Positive Tested Positive Predecess 17 0 203 0

( Post accident 7 0 0 0 e

-h Obse. .ed behavior 5 2 1 0 Ran'dem 267 1 204 0 Follow up 28 0 17 o Other 7 0 3 o Total 331 3 428 0 REV.1/92

Breakdown of Confirmed Positive Tests for Specific Substances 9 Amphe- Phency- Refusal Marijuana Cocaino Opiates famines clidine Alcohol to Test 1 2 3 4 5 Licensee Employees 1 2 Long-Term Contractors Short-Term Contractors A

Total 1 2 3 4

y e

b f e e .

9 s

Attachment 1

- Page 1 of 2 l

4 Summary of Data Analysis and Management Actions i Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station January - June 1995

! 1. Initiatives Taken i

The following summarizes the results of sweeps conducted by PECO Energy Company's drug sniffing canine teams as well as investigations and interviews used to confirm information about i Illicit activities at Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS) during the period.

l a. January 31,1995 - General team sweep of the Document Control Section. Results: Four 4 activations. - No drugs found or forwnsic samples taken.

i

- b. February 28,1995 General team sweep of the South Substation Control House.

4 Results: No activations.

- c. March 14,1995 - For cause team sweep of an employee's private vehicle. Results: No

! activations. However, an open alcohol beverage container was discovered in plain view.

Employee tested positive for alcohol. Plant access denied

d. March 31,1995 - General team sweep of the North Substation. Results: Four activations. No drugs found or forensic samples taken. An opened container of vodka was found in a Company vehicle. Employee admitted to purchasing the vodka.

Employee disciolined and plant access deD}fd.

i

} e. March 31,1995 - General team sweep of the Plant Services Building. first floor. Results:

Two activations. No drugs found or forensic samples taken.

! f. May 4,1995 - General team sweep of Laydown Area between 'C' and "D" cooling

towers. Results

Two activations. No drugs found or forensic samples taken.

!' g. May 22,1995 - For cause team sweep of a Company vehicle and employee's i possessions. Results: Three activations. No drugs found or forensic samples taken.

h. May 25,1995 - For cause team sweep of employee's possessions and private vehicie.

Results: Four activations. Employee denied lilegal drug use, but tested positive for marijuana. Plant access denied.

l. May 26,1995 - General team sweep of five different owner controlled areas and one Company vehicle. Results: No activations.

J. June 16,1995 - General team sweep of one contractor vehicle and twelve Company vehicles. Results: Four activations. No drugs found or forensic samples taken.

11. Manaoement Actions During the period, three PECO Energy employees (i.e., one random, two observed behavior) tested positive at PBAPS. Unescorted access was denied for all three employees. The employees were provided treatment and rehabilitation through the PECO Energy Employee Assistance Program. One employee has subsequently been granted unescorted access. The other two employees have been assigned to duties which do not require unescorted access.

~. -- .

l AttachmCnt 1

- Page 2 of 2 til. Events Reoorted Under 10 CFR 26.73 There were no significant FFD events reported by PBAPS during the period. l IV. Algilts/Insoections  ;

During the period, the NRC Region I conducted a reactive FFD inspection (Inspection Report Nos. 50-352/95-08 and 50-353/9548). The inspection was primarily conducted at Umerick Generating Station (LGS), but examined aspects of the program across the Nuclear Group. A summary of the inspection findings is reported under Attachment 2, " Summary of Data Analysis and Management Action, Limerick Generating Station."

V. Random Testina Rate PECO Energy maintains separate testing " pools" for employees and contractors. Random testing is conducted at an annualized rate of 50%. The " average number with unescorted access" includes personnel granted unescorted access at both PBAPS and LGS.

VI. Additional Information Actions Taken Based Uoon Unconfirmed On-site Screenina PECO Energy has decided to temporarily suspend access for individuals as permitted by 10CFR26.24(d).

During the previous 6-month reporting period, (i.e., July - December 1994),100% of the specimens which were determined to be presumptively positive for cocaine as a result of preliminary on-site screening tests were subsequently reported as positive by the HHS-certified laboratory. The confirmation rate for marijuana was less than the required 85 percent; therefore, no action was taken on specimens identified as presumptive positive for marijuana.

During this reporting period there were two specimens which were identified as presumptive j positive for marijuana as a result of on-site screening. Laboratory screening resulted in one of those specimens screening positive. The specimen was also confirmed positive by the HHS- i certified laboratory. The Medical Review Officer (MRO) verified that specimen as positive i following discussion with the individual. Administrative actions were not taken until after the MRO determinations and only against the individual with the confirmed positive test.

Reduced Mariluana Cut-off Level During the period, there was one confirmed positive test for marijuana at PBAoS. The specimen would not have tested positive using the 100 ng/ml immunoassay cutoff leve.

l

N N i

+

4

\

ATTACHMENT 2 Limerick Generating Station Units 1 and 2 Fitness-for-Duty Performance Data ,

January 1995 through June 1995 l

n iL 1 . _ _ - , _ - . .. - - . -,

Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data Personnel Subject to 10CFR 26 b

9 Peco Energy Company June 30, 1995' Company e Monen Endng

' Limerick Generatjng Station

• Locanon David M. Sarley (215) 841-5703 .

~

Contac: Name Phone (inc!ude area code)

Cutoffs: Screen / Confirmation (ng/ml) O Appendix A to 10CFR 26 Marijuana 50 / 15 Amphetamines 1000 / 500 -

/

Cocaine 300 / 150 Phencyclidine 25 / 25 /

Opiates 300-/ 300 Alcohol (% BAC) 0.04 /

. Long-Term Short-Term

' Tcsting Results Ucensee Employees' Contractor Personnel Contracto'r Personnel Average Number witt-Unescorted Access 2523 1648 t # # # #

Categories Tested Positive Tested Posi'Jve Tested Positive Pre-Acces: 45 0 1001 16 I k Post accident 22 0 8 0 0

$- Obse..ed behavior 15 0 7 4 R:ndom 299 0 192 0

)

1 Follow-up 67 0 19 0 l

Other 4 0 1 0 Tot:1 452 0 1228 20 REv.1/92

Breakdown of Confirmed Positive Tests for Specific Substances 9 Amphe- Phency- Flefusal .

Marijuana Cocaine Oplates famines c5 dine Mcohol to Test '1 2  : 3 4 5 Ucensee Employees Lon0-Term Contractors Short-Term _ Contractors -9. 5 2- 8 2 A

-Total '9 5 2 8 2 26 9 4 O $

g g fB e

5 6

0 e e .

9 m m,

3 .

O e

e 4 , y ~, . , , - ,, y -

-,.c s - - -  % + v , -w=- -w _ v- ________ _ _-__

Attachment 2 Page 1 of 5 Summary of Data Analysis and Management Actions Limerick Generating Station January - June 1995

1. in:tlatives Taken The following summarizes the results of sweeps conducted by PECO Energy Company's drug sniffing canine teams as well as investigations and interviews used to confirm information about  ;

lilicit activities at Umerick Generating Station (LGS) during the period. )

a. January 5,1995 - Unidentified pill found in the Protected Area. Laboratory analysis Indicated over-the-counter medication,

b. January 25,1995 -Information developed from an informant Indicating alleged drug use by Health Physics employees. Investigation initiated. Credible allegations were substantiated against twelve employees and two contractors.

c. February 2,1995 - General team sweep of the Health Physics field office. Results: Three activations. No drugs found or forensic samples taken.

d. February 10,1995 - General team sweep of the Materials Management facility. Results:

No activations,

e. February 11,1995 - For cause team sweep of a supervisory employee's private vehicle.

Results: One activation. No drugs found or forensic samples taken. Employee Interviewed and admitted off-site drug use. The employee resianed.

f. February 11,1995 - For cause team sweep of an employee's private vehicle. Results:

Two activations. No drugs found or forensic samples taken. Employee interviewed and admitted off-site drug use, distributing drugs to other employees, and hydration to avoid det6ction. Employee resianed.

g. February 12,1995 - For cause team sweep of supervisory employee's ptivate vehicle.

Results: No activations. Employee interviewed and admitted off-site drug use.

Employee resion_gd.

h. February 12,1995 - For cause team sweep of an employee's private vehicle. Results:

No act!vations. Employee interviewed and admitted off site drug use, selling and distributing drugs to other employees, and hydration to avoid detection. Employee resigned.

1. February 13,1995 - For cause team sweep of supervisory employee's private vehicle.

Results: No activations. Employee interviewed and admitted off-site drug use and hydration to avoid detection. Employee dismissed.

J. February 13,1995 - For cause team sweep of an employee's private vehicle. Results:

Two activations. No drugs found or forensic samples taken. Employee interviewed but denied illegal drug use. No further action taken.

k. February 13,1995 - For cause team sweep of an employee's private vehicle. Results:

No activations. Employee interviewed but denied illegal drug use. No further action taken.

Attachment 2  ;

- Page 2 of 5 :

l. February 13,1995 For cause team sweep of an employee's private vehicle. Results:

No activations. Employee interviewed and admitted off-site drug use. Employee's

^,

sccess was denied

m. February 15,1995 - For cause team sweep of a contractor's private vehicle. Results:

Two activations. No drugs found or forensic samples taken. Contractor interviewed but denied illegal drug use. Investigation established that contractor employee was involved

! In the off-site distribution, sale, and use of drugs. Contractor emplovee denied 4

aCCOss

n. February 15,1995 - For cause team sweep of an employee's private vehicle. Results:

No activations. Employee interviewed and admitted off-site drug use. Employee access denied.

o. February 17,1995 For cause team sweep of an employee's private vehicle. Results:

Four activations Forensic samples taken. Laboratory analysis proved negative.

Employee interviewed and admitted off-site drug use and distributing drugs to other employees. Employee resianed

p. February 21,1995 General team sweep of all Health Physics work areas. Results:

Thirteen activations. Forensic samples taken.1.aboratory analysis proved negative.

q. February 21,1995 - For cause team sweep of an employee's private vehicle. Results:

No activations. Employee interviewed but denied lilegal drug use. No further action taken.

4

r. February 22,1995 - For cause team _ sweep of an employee's private vehicle. Results: '

i No activations. Employee interviewed but denied illegal drug use. No further action taken.

s. February 22,1995 - For cause tem sweep of an employee's private vehicle. Results:

No activations. Employee interviewed but denied illegal drug use. No further action taken,

t. Febiuary 24,1995 - For cause team sweep of an employee's private vehicle. Results:

No activations. Employee interviewed and admitted off-site drug use. Employ _en denied access.

u. March 7,1995 - For cause team sweep of an employee's private vehicle. Results: No activations. Employee interviewed and admitted off-site drug use. Employee denied SCCess

v. March 7,1995 - For cause team sweep of an employee's private vehicle. Results: No activations. Employee interviewed and admitted off-site drug use. Employee denied access

w. March 22,1995 - For cause interview of contractor employee based upon credible allegation. Results: Contractor denied drug use. Investigation established that the contractor employee was involved in off-site drug use. Contractor emolovee denied SCCess

Atta!hment 2

- Page 3 of 5

x. April 4,1995 - General team sweep of the cafeteria area. Results: Five activations. No drugs found or forensic samples taken.

y. May 23,1995 For cause search (no dog used) of contractor's private vehicle based upon developed information. Results: Containers of alcohol found on-site (outside of Protected Area). Contractor interviewed and admitted alcohol use. Contractor employee tested positive for alcohol. Contractor employee denied ac::ess,

z. May 23,1995 - Contractor employee tested for cause based upon developed investigative information. Results: Positive for lilegal drug. Contractor emplovee denied access aa. June 1,1995 General team sweep of construction area within the Administration Building. Results: Ten activations. No drugs found or forensic samples taken.

bb. June 1,1995 - For cause team sweep of a contractor's private vehicle. Results: Four activations. No drugs found or forensic samples taken.

fl. Manaaement Actions During the period, twenty contractor employees (i.e., sixteen pre-access, four observed behavior) tested positive at LGS. Unescorted access was denied for all twenty contractor employees.

Ill. Events Recor1ed Under 10 CFR 26.73 During the period there was one significant FFD event reported by telephone under 10CFR26.73 by LGS.

The report contained information developed during an investigation regarding allegations and admissions of three supervisory personnel being involved in the off-site use and possession of a controlled substance. The supervisors involved were denied access to PECO Energy nuclear  ;

I

facilities and records documented as such for employment inquiries from other nuclear licensees

subject to 91-03 data transfer. Two of the supervisors subsequently resigned from employment.

the third was discharged.

l J

} Non-supervisory personnel identified during the course of this investigation who did not resign

' were referred to the Employee Assistance Program for treatment. Following satisfactory completion of treatment, the employees unescorted access was reinstated.

The investigation also identified two non-supervisory contractor persormel who were involved In l off-site drug use. The contractor personnel were denied access. The denial of access was communicated by telephone to the nuclear licensees where the contractor personnel were then working. ,

I All personnel identified during the investigation submitted to ior cause drug and alcohol testing.

None tested positive.

I l

1 l

Attachment 2 Page 4 of 5 j IV. Audits /Insoections The NRC Region I conducted a reactive FFD inspection, es documented in Inspection Report Nos. 50-352/9548 and 50-353/95 08, in response to the significant FFD event recorted above.

The inspection was primarily conducted at LGS, but examined aspects of the p ogram across l

the Nuclear Group.

The inspection identified that PECO Energy had in place a FFD program which continued to be implemented for the protection of the public health and safety. The repo:t commended PECO Energy's afforts in identifying the noncompliance of cerWo employees with the FFD program, and for taking prompt, appropriate action. The ?nspector reported an " apparent" violation in that supervisors with behavioral observation responsibilities failed to require for cause testing of individuals following observed behavior Indicating wbstance abuse.

The report identified issues involving implementation of program changes, documentation of procedures for the notification of personnel selected for testing, and individuals excused from testing.

The issues have been reviewed and corrective actions are in progress.

V. Random Testina Rate PECO Energy maintains separate testing " pools" for employees and contractors. Random testing is conducted at an annualized rate of 50%. The " average number with unescorted access' includes personnel granted unescorted access at both PBAPS and LGS.

VI. Additional Information Actions Taken Based Uoon Unconfirmed On-site Screenino PECO Energy has dec;ded to temporarily suspend access for individuals as permitted by 10CFR26.24(d).

During the previous 6-month reporting period, (i.e., July - December 1994),100% of the specimens which were determined to be presumptively positive for cocaine es a result of preliminary on-site screening tests were subsequently reported as positive by the HHS-certified laboratory. The confirmation rate for marijuana was less than the required 85 percent; therefore, no action was taken on specimens identified as presumptive positive for marijuana.

During this reporting period there were four specimens identified as presumptive positive for cocaine as a result of on-site screening. The four specimens were also screened positive and reported as confirmed positive by the HHS-certified laboratory. The Medical Review Officer (MRO) verified the four specimens as positive following discussion with the Individuals. Three of the specimens were collected as part of pre-access testing; therefore, the temporary suspension of access was not applicable. The fourth specimen was collected based upon a for cause event and the individual's unescorted access was temporarily stispended. Upon MRO verification, unescorted access was denied.

l

Atta hment 2 i

Page 5 of 5 j

During this reporting period there were eighteen specimens identified as presumptive positive for marijuana as a result of on-site screening. Eleven of those specimens screened positive and ten were reported as confirmed positive by the HHS-certified laboratory. The MRO verified the ten specimens as positive following discussion with the indMduals. Administrative actions were not taken until after the MRO determinations and only against the ladividuals with the confirmed positive tests. (The performance data report breakdown reflects only nine marijuana positives as one individual tested positive on two specimens collected the same date.)

Reduced Mariluana Cutdf Level During the period, there were nine confirmed positive tests for marijuana at LGS. Eight of the specimens would not have tested positive using the 100 ng/mi immunoassay cut-off level.

Contractor Information The following information regarding contractor positive is provided:

,Q_r raft Vital / Protected Area Access Lona/Short Term Electrician Vital Granted Short Asbestos Worker Vital Granted Short Laborer Wnr.e Regaested Short Carpenter Vital Requested Short Carpenter Vital Requested Short Bollermaker Vital Requested Long Pipefitter Vital Requested Short Electrician Vital Requested Long Laborer None Requested Short Electrician Vital Requested Short Asbestos Worker Vital Requested Long Asbestos Worker Vital Requ9sted Long Iron Worker Vital Requested Long Technician Vital Requested Short Technician Vital Requested Short Pipefitter Vital Requested Long Technician Vital Requested Short NDE/ISI Inspector Vital Requested Long Pipefitter Vital Requested Long Vendor Vital Rec sested Long i

i I

i l

l i

l ATTACHMENT 3 Corporete and Nuclear Group Headquarters Fitness-for-Duty Performance Data January 1995 through June 1995 J-

Fitness for Duty Program

. Performance Data Personnel Subject to 10CFR 26 1

Pecn Fnergy Company June 30, 1993 Company a Mont.: En%

Corocrate and Nuclear Group Headquarters

• Locanon David M. Sarley (215) 841-5703 Contac Name Phone (include araa code) 3 ,-  :-

Cutoffs: Scre en/ Confirmation (ng/ml) O Appendix A to 10CFR 26 Marijuana 50 / 15 Amphetamines 1000 / 500 / .

Cccaine 300 / 150 Phencyclidine 25 #

/ 25 j Opiates 300 / 300 0.04

, Alcohol (% BAC) /

~

. Long-Term Short-Term Testing Results Licensee Employees Contractor Personnel Contractdr Personnel Average Number with Unescorted Access 2523 1648

1. 2 # # # #

Categories Tested Positive Tested Positive Tested Positive Pre-Access 5 0 3 0

[ Post accident 2 0 0 0

?

$ Obser/ed behavior 0 0 0 0 Random 85 0 21 0 Follow up 26 1 o o Other 3 0 0 0 Total 121 1 24 0 REV.1/92

A y 8

5 4

3 2

1 9  %

l at s s

f uTe Rt eo s lc h

e o c

c n lA t

a s -

yo b c n n u ed .

S i

ht P c i

c 9

~

f e- os i

c e hpi n p mm S Af a .

r

• e f

o s .

te t

s ia s p e O T

e o i

v la n

t c 1 i i

s o o C P a n

d a u

e j ir m a i

r M f

n s s o s r

o r

o C e t c

t c

f e y a a r

o o t r

n t

n n lp o o m C C w E o e m r

m r

d e e e k s n T- T-a e g

n t

r o

l a

e c o h t

o  %

r U L S T B

• Attaihment 3 Page 1 of 1 4

Summary of Data Analysis and Management Actions Corporate and Nuclear Group Headquarters January - June 1995

1. Inhiatives Taken The following summarizes the results of sweeps conducted by PECO Energy Company's drug sniffing canine teams as well as investigations and interviews used to confirm Information about lilicit activities at Corporate and Nuclear Group Headquarters during the period.

a. March 6,1995 - General team sweep of the 965 Building,1st Floor, Emergency Preparedness anc Support Facilities. Results: One activation. No drugs found or i forensic samples taken.

II. Manaaement Actions During the period, one PECO Energy employee tested positive on a follow-up test conducted at

the Nuclear Group Headquarters. The employee was previously denied unescorted access i based on prior positive tests. The employee was discharaed.

lit. Events Reoorted Under 10 CFR 26.73 There were no events reported during the period.

IV. Audits /Insoections 4 During the period, the NRC rod i on I conducted a reactive FFD inspection (Inspection Report Nos. 50-352/95-08 and 50-353/95-08). The Inspection was primarily conducted at Limerick Generating Station (LGS), but examined aspects of the program across the Nuclear Group. A i summary of the inspection findings is reported under Attachment 2, " Summary of Data Analysis and Management Action, Limerick Generating Station."

j V. Random Testina Rate l l

PECO Energy maintains separate testing " pools" for employees and contractors. Random testing is conducted at an annualized rate of 50%. The " average number with unescorted access' includes personnel granted unescorted access at both PBAPS and LGS.

VI. Additional Information l

< 1 Actions Taken Based Voon Unconfirmed On-99 Screenina j Specimens collected at the Corporate and Nuclear Group Headquarters are forwarded directly l to the HHS-certified laboratory for testing. On-site screening is not conducted. j Reduced Mariluana Cut-off Level d

There were no confirmed positive test for marijuana during the period.

l l

l l

i