ML19121A177: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Adams | |||
| number = ML19121A177 | |||
| issue date = 04/18/2019 | |||
| title = Herzog Contracting Corp. - NRC Form 591M Parts 1 & 3, Inspection Report 03032650/2019001(DNMS) | |||
| author name = Null K | |||
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III | |||
| addressee name = Cayer G | |||
| addressee affiliation = Herzog Contracting Corp | |||
| docket = 03032650 | |||
| license number = 24-26380-01 | |||
| contact person = | |||
| document report number = IR 2019001 | |||
| document type = Inspection Report, Safety and Compliance Inspection Record, NRC Form 591 | |||
| page count = 2 | |||
}} | |||
See also: [[see also::IR 05000201/1990001]] | |||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:NRC FORM 591M PART 1 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | |||
(07-2012) | |||
1ocFR2.201 SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT AND COMPLIANCE INSPECTION | |||
1. LICENSEE/LOCATION INSPECTED: 2. NRC/REGIONAL OFFICE | |||
ft*tv Zdj {, vwf-v-t.w+t; ( 0"f' Region III | |||
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission | |||
i 03 @.uH.pvrl- (l u'-J 2443 Warrenville Road, Suite 210 | |||
6:'l !AJ cJqjtiC tl r (601y Lisle, IL 60532-4352 | |||
REPORT NUMBER($) 2019-001 | |||
3. DOCKET NUMBER(S) 4. LICENSE NUMBER(S) 5. DATE(S) OF INSPECTION | |||
030-32650 24-26380-01 | |||
I | |||
LICENSEE: | |||
The inspection was an examination of the activities conducted under your license as they relate to radiation safety and to compliance with the Nuclear | |||
Regulatory Commission (NRC) rules and regulations and the conditions of your license. The inspection consisted of selective examinations of | |||
procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector. The inspection findings are as follows: | |||
ljL 1. Based on the inspection findings, no violations were identified. | |||
D 2. Previous violation(s) closed. | |||
D 3. The violations(s), specifically described to you by the inspector as non-cited violations, are not being cited because they were self-identified, | |||
non-repetitive, and corrective action was or is being taken, and the remaining criteria in the NRC Enforcement Policy, to exercise | |||
discretion, were satisfied. | |||
Non-cited violation(s) were discussed involving the following requirement(s): | |||
----- | |||
D 4. During this inspection, certain of your activities, as described below and/or attached, were in violation of NRC requirements and are being | |||
cited in accordance with NRC Enforcement Policy. This form is a NOTICE OF VIOLATION, which may be subject to posting in accordance | |||
with 10 CFR 19. 11. | |||
(Violations and Corrective Actions) | |||
Statement of Corrective Actions | |||
I hereby state that. within 30 days, the actions described by me to the Inspector will be taken to correct the violations identified. This statement of | |||
corrective actions is made in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 2.201 (corrective steps already taken, corrective steps which will be taken, | |||
date when full compliance will be achieved). I understand that no further written response to NRC will be required, unless specifically requested. | |||
TITLE PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE DATE | |||
LICENSEE'S | |||
REPRESENTATIVE A | |||
NRC INSPECTOR Kevin G. Null | |||
BRANCH CHIEF {\_ | |||
\I ~Ml)~-.- \ * | |||
\.,\ c.. I"_ | |||
J . . ' - '-.ilA~ | |||
, | |||
NRC FORM 591M PART 1 (07-2012) | |||
NRC FORM 591 M PART 3 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULA TORY COMMISSION | |||
(07-2012) | |||
10 CFR 2.201 Docket File Information | |||
SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT AND COMPLIANCE INSPECTION | |||
1. LICENSEE/LOCATION INSPECTED: 2. NRG/REGIONAL OFFICE | |||
Herzog Contracting Corporation Region III | |||
103 Roseport Road U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission | |||
Elwood, KS 66024 2443 Warrenville Road, Suite 210 | |||
Lisle, IL 60532-4352 | |||
REPORT NUMBER(S) 2019-001 | |||
3. DOCKET NUMBER(S) 4. LICENSE NUMBER{S) 5. DATE(S) OF INSPECTION | |||
030-32650 24-26380-01 April 18, 2019 | |||
6. INSPECTION PROCEDURES USED 7. INSPECTION FOCUS AREAS | |||
87124 All | |||
SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTION INFORMATION | |||
1. PROGRAM CODE(S) 2. PRIORITY 3. LICENSEE CONTACT 4. TELEPHONE NUMBER | |||
3121 5 Gregory Cayer, RSO (816) 901-4958 | |||
[{] Main Office Inspection Next Inspection Date: 04/18/2024 | |||
D Field Office Inspection | |||
D Temporary Job Site Inspection | |||
PROGRAM SCOPE | |||
This was a routine, unannounced inspection of a licensee that was authorized to possess and use portable gauges for | |||
measuring physical properties of materials. At the time of the inspection, the licensee possessed two troxler model 3400 | |||
series gauges. The licensee had three employees, including the radiation safety officer (RSO), who had been trained by | |||
the manufacturer to use the devices. The gauges were used at temporary job sites where NRC maintains jurisdiction, | |||
namely Missouri. The licensee also possessed a State of Kansas license that authorized the storage and use of portable | |||
gauges in Kansas. | |||
PERFORMANCE OBSERVATIONS | |||
The inspector interviewed the RSO and a trained portable gauge user. The RSO demonstrated how the devices were | |||
secured when not in use or under constant surveillance while in NRC jurisdiction. The trained user demonstrated how a | |||
gauge would be transported when taken to a temporary job site, and provided examples of the shipping/transportation | |||
documentation and emergency procedures that accompanied each gauge when transported to a job site. Gauges were | |||
always returned to the main office in Kansas for storage and never stored at temporary job sites. The licensee only | |||
performed routine maintenance/cleaning of the gauges. Servicing of the gauges that involved removal of the source rod | |||
was performed by the gauge manufacturer. The licensee possessed two survey meters that were calibrated on an annual | |||
basis. Authorized users were issued personal dosimetry, which was exchanged quarterly. | |||
The inspector reviewed records of training (including HAZMAT certificates), personal dosimetry, gauge use log records, | |||
results of sealed source leak tests and physical inventory, transportation binders that accompanied each gauge to a job | |||
site, and survey meter calibration records. | |||
No violations of NRC requirements were identified. | |||
NRG FORM 591M PART 3 (07-2012) | |||
}} |
Latest revision as of 21:49, 16 March 2020
ML19121A177 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | 03032650 |
Issue date: | 04/18/2019 |
From: | Kevin Null NRC/RGN-III |
To: | Cayer G Herzog Contracting Corp |
References | |
IR 2019001 | |
Download: ML19121A177 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000201/1990001
Text
NRC FORM 591M PART 1 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
(07-2012)
1ocFR2.201 SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT AND COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
1. LICENSEE/LOCATION INSPECTED: 2. NRC/REGIONAL OFFICE
ft*tv Zdj {, vwf-v-t.w+t; ( 0"f' Region III
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
i 03 @.uH.pvrl- (l u'-J 2443 Warrenville Road, Suite 210
6:'l !AJ cJqjtiC tl r (601y Lisle, IL 60532-4352
REPORT NUMBER($) 2019-001
3. DOCKET NUMBER(S) 4. LICENSE NUMBER(S) 5. DATE(S) OF INSPECTION
030-32650 24-26380-01
I
LICENSEE:
The inspection was an examination of the activities conducted under your license as they relate to radiation safety and to compliance with the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC) rules and regulations and the conditions of your license. The inspection consisted of selective examinations of
procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector. The inspection findings are as follows:
ljL 1. Based on the inspection findings, no violations were identified.
D 2. Previous violation(s) closed.
D 3. The violations(s), specifically described to you by the inspector as non-cited violations, are not being cited because they were self-identified,
non-repetitive, and corrective action was or is being taken, and the remaining criteria in the NRC Enforcement Policy, to exercise
discretion, were satisfied.
Non-cited violation(s) were discussed involving the following requirement(s):
D 4. During this inspection, certain of your activities, as described below and/or attached, were in violation of NRC requirements and are being
cited in accordance with NRC Enforcement Policy. This form is a NOTICE OF VIOLATION, which may be subject to posting in accordance
with 10 CFR 19. 11.
(Violations and Corrective Actions)
Statement of Corrective Actions
I hereby state that. within 30 days, the actions described by me to the Inspector will be taken to correct the violations identified. This statement of
corrective actions is made in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 2.201 (corrective steps already taken, corrective steps which will be taken,
date when full compliance will be achieved). I understand that no further written response to NRC will be required, unless specifically requested.
TITLE PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE DATE
LICENSEE'S
REPRESENTATIVE A
NRC INSPECTOR Kevin G. Null
BRANCH CHIEF {\_
\I ~Ml)~-.- \ *
\.,\ c.. I"_
J . . ' - '-.ilA~
,
NRC FORM 591M PART 1 (07-2012)
NRC FORM 591 M PART 3 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULA TORY COMMISSION
(07-2012)
10 CFR 2.201 Docket File Information
SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT AND COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
1. LICENSEE/LOCATION INSPECTED: 2. NRG/REGIONAL OFFICE
Herzog Contracting Corporation Region III
103 Roseport Road U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Elwood, KS 66024 2443 Warrenville Road, Suite 210
Lisle, IL 60532-4352
REPORT NUMBER(S) 2019-001
3. DOCKET NUMBER(S) 4. LICENSE NUMBER{S) 5. DATE(S) OF INSPECTION
030-32650 24-26380-01 April 18, 2019
6. INSPECTION PROCEDURES USED 7. INSPECTION FOCUS AREAS
87124 All
SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTION INFORMATION
1. PROGRAM CODE(S) 2. PRIORITY 3. LICENSEE CONTACT 4. TELEPHONE NUMBER
3121 5 Gregory Cayer, RSO (816) 901-4958
[{] Main Office Inspection Next Inspection Date: 04/18/2024
D Field Office Inspection
D Temporary Job Site Inspection
PROGRAM SCOPE
This was a routine, unannounced inspection of a licensee that was authorized to possess and use portable gauges for
measuring physical properties of materials. At the time of the inspection, the licensee possessed two troxler model 3400
series gauges. The licensee had three employees, including the radiation safety officer (RSO), who had been trained by
the manufacturer to use the devices. The gauges were used at temporary job sites where NRC maintains jurisdiction,
namely Missouri. The licensee also possessed a State of Kansas license that authorized the storage and use of portable
PERFORMANCE OBSERVATIONS
The inspector interviewed the RSO and a trained portable gauge user. The RSO demonstrated how the devices were
secured when not in use or under constant surveillance while in NRC jurisdiction. The trained user demonstrated how a
gauge would be transported when taken to a temporary job site, and provided examples of the shipping/transportation
documentation and emergency procedures that accompanied each gauge when transported to a job site. Gauges were
always returned to the main office in Kansas for storage and never stored at temporary job sites. The licensee only
performed routine maintenance/cleaning of the gauges. Servicing of the gauges that involved removal of the source rod
was performed by the gauge manufacturer. The licensee possessed two survey meters that were calibrated on an annual
basis. Authorized users were issued personal dosimetry, which was exchanged quarterly.
The inspector reviewed records of training (including HAZMAT certificates), personal dosimetry, gauge use log records,
results of sealed source leak tests and physical inventory, transportation binders that accompanied each gauge to a job
site, and survey meter calibration records.
No violations of NRC requirements were identified.
NRG FORM 591M PART 3 (07-2012)