ML18166A112: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 13: Line 13:
| document type = Federal Register Notice
| document type = Federal Register Notice
| page count = 8
| page count = 8
| project =
| stage = Other
}}
}}


Line 46: Line 48:
4
4
: 1. In a letter dated August 31, 2017, and supplemented by letters dated February 9, 2018, and March 8, 2018, the licensee requested from the Commission an exemption from the provisions of 10 CFR part 52, appendix D, section III.B, as part of license amendment request (LAR) 17-023, Improvements to Main Control Room Post-Accident Radiological Consequences.
: 1. In a letter dated August 31, 2017, and supplemented by letters dated February 9, 2018, and March 8, 2018, the licensee requested from the Commission an exemption from the provisions of 10 CFR part 52, appendix D, section III.B, as part of license amendment request (LAR) 17-023, Improvements to Main Control Room Post-Accident Radiological Consequences.
For the reasons set forth in Section 3.1, Evaluation of Exemption, of the NRC staffs safety evaluation, which can be found in ADAMS under Accession No.
For the reasons set forth in Section 3.1, Evaluation of Exemption, of the NRC staffs safety evaluation, which can be found in ADAMS under Accession No. ML18085A628, the Commission finds that:
ML18085A628, the Commission finds that:
A.      The exemption is authorized by law; B.      The exemption presents no undue risk to public health and safety; C.      The exemption is consistent with the common defense and security; D.      Special circumstances are present in that the application of the rule in this circumstance is not necessary to serve the underlying purpose of the rule; E.      The special circumstances outweigh any decrease in safety that may result from the reduction in standardization caused by the exemption; and F.      The exemption will not result in a significant decrease in the level of safety otherwise provided by the design.
A.      The exemption is authorized by law; B.      The exemption presents no undue risk to public health and safety; C.      The exemption is consistent with the common defense and security; D.      Special circumstances are present in that the application of the rule in this circumstance is not necessary to serve the underlying purpose of the rule; E.      The special circumstances outweigh any decrease in safety that may result from the reduction in standardization caused by the exemption; and F.      The exemption will not result in a significant decrease in the level of safety otherwise provided by the design.
5
5

Latest revision as of 22:09, 2 February 2020

Individual Issuance Federal Register Notice LAR 17-023
ML18166A112
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 06/19/2018
From: Jennifer Dixon-Herrity
NRC/NRO/DNRL/LB4
To:
Kallan P/415-2809
References
NRC-2008-0252
Download: ML18166A112 (8)


Text

[7590-01-P]

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos.52-025 and 52-026; NRC-2008-0252]

Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.;

Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 3 and 4, Improvements to Main Control Room Post-Accident Radiological Consequences AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Exemption and combined license amendment; issuance.

SUMMARY

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is granting an exemption to allow a departure from the certification information of Tier 1 of the generic AP1000 design control document (DCD) and is issuing License Amendment Nos. 123 and 122 to Combined Licenses (COL), NPF-91 and NPF-92, respectively. The COLs were issued to Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc., and Georgia Power Company, Oglethorpe Power Corporation, MEAG Power SPVM, LLC, MEAG Power SPVJ, LLC, MEAG Power SPVP, LLC, and the City of Dalton, Georgia (the licensee); for construction and operation of the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant (VEGP) Units 3 and 4, located in Burke County, Georgia.

The granting of the exemption allows the changes to Tier 1 information that is requested in the amendment. Because the acceptability of the exemption was determined in part by the acceptability of the amendment, the exemption and amendment are being issued concurrently.

DATES: The exemption and amendment were issued on April 20, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2008-0252 when contacting the NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You may access information related to this document, which the NRC possesses and is publicly available, using any of the following methods:

  • Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2008-0252. Address questions about NRC dockets to Jennifer Borges; 301-287-9127; e-mail: Jennifer.Borges@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document.
  • NRCs Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may access publicly available documents online in the NRC Library at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ADAMS Public Documents and then select Begin Web-based ADAMS Search. For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRCs Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by e-mail to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The ADAMS accession number for each document referenced (if that document is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time that a document is referenced. The request for the amendment and exemption was submitted by letter dated August 31, 2017 (ADAMS Accession No. ML17243A352) and supplemented by letters dated February 9, 2018 and March 8, 2018 (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML18040A488 and ML18067A648).
  • NRCs PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public documents at the NRCs PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.

2

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Kallan, Office of New Reactors, U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone:

301-415-2809; e-mail: Paul.Kallan@nrc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background The NRC is granting exemptions from paragraph B of section III, Scope and Contents, of appendix D, Design Certification Rule for the AP1000, to part 52 of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) and issuing License Amendment Nos. 123 and 122 to COLs, NPF-91 and NPF-92, respectively, to the licensee. The exemptions are required by paragraph A.4 of section VIII, Processes for Changes and Departures, appendix D, to 10 CFR part 52 to allow the licensee to depart from Tier 1 information. With the requested amendment, the licensee proposes to departs from Tier 2 information in the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (which includes the plant-specific Design Control Document (DCD) Tier 2 information) and involves related changes to plant-specific Tier 1 (and associated COL Appendix C) information, and COL Appendix A Technical Specifications. Specifically, the amendment changes the plant-specific nuclear island non-radioactive ventilation system, the main control room emergency habitability system, and post-accident operator dose analyses. These changes maintain compliance with General Design Criterion (19), which requires that main control room personnel dose does not exceed 5 roentgen equivalent man (rem) total effective dose equivalent for the duration of a design basis accident.

3

Part of the justification for granting the exemptions was provided by the review of the amendments. Because the exemption is necessary in order to issue the requested license amendment, the NRC granted the exemptions and issued the amendments concurrently, rather than in sequence. This included issuing a combined safety evaluation containing the NRC staffs review of both the exemption request and the license amendment. The exemptions met all applicable regulatory criteria set forth in 10 CFR 50.12, 10 CFR 52.7, and Section VIII.A.4 of appendix D to 10 CFR part 52. The license amendments were found to be acceptable as well. The combined safety evaluation is available in ADAMS under Accession No. ML18085A628.

Identical exemption documents (except for referenced unit numbers and license numbers) were issued to the licensee for VEGP Units 3 and 4 (COLs NPF-91 and NPF-92). The exemption documents for VEGP Units 3 and 4 can be found in ADAMS under Accession Nos. ML18085A622 and ML18085A623, respectively. The exemption is reproduced (with the exception of abbreviated titles and additional citations) in Section II of this document. The amendment documents for COLs NPF-91 and NPF-92 are available in ADAMS under Accession Nos. ML18085A624 and ML18085A626, respectively. A summary of the amendment documents is provided in Section III of this document.

II. Exemption Reproduced below is the exemption document issued to VEGP, Units 3 and Unit 4. It makes reference to the combined safety evaluation that provides the reasoning for the findings made by the NRC (and listed under Item 1) in order to grant the exemption:

4

1. In a letter dated August 31, 2017, and supplemented by letters dated February 9, 2018, and March 8, 2018, the licensee requested from the Commission an exemption from the provisions of 10 CFR part 52, appendix D, section III.B, as part of license amendment request (LAR)17-023, Improvements to Main Control Room Post-Accident Radiological Consequences.

For the reasons set forth in Section 3.1, Evaluation of Exemption, of the NRC staffs safety evaluation, which can be found in ADAMS under Accession No. ML18085A628, the Commission finds that:

A. The exemption is authorized by law; B. The exemption presents no undue risk to public health and safety; C. The exemption is consistent with the common defense and security; D. Special circumstances are present in that the application of the rule in this circumstance is not necessary to serve the underlying purpose of the rule; E. The special circumstances outweigh any decrease in safety that may result from the reduction in standardization caused by the exemption; and F. The exemption will not result in a significant decrease in the level of safety otherwise provided by the design.

5

2. Accordingly, the licensee is granted an exemption from the certified DCD Tier 1 information, with corresponding changes to Appendix C of the Facility Combined Licenses as described in the licensees request dated August 31, 2017, as supplemented by letters dated February 9, 2018, and March 8, 2018. This exemption is related to, and necessary for, the granting of License Amendment Nos. 123 and 122, which is being issued concurrently with this exemption.
3. As explained in Section 5.0, Environmental Consideration, of the NRC staffs safety evaluation (ADAMS Accession No. ML18085A628), this exemption meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment needs to be prepared in connection with the issuance of the exemption.
4. These exemptions are effective as of the date of its issuance.

III. License Amendment Request By letter dated August 31, 2017, and supplemented by letters dated February 9, 2018, and March 8, 2018, the licensee requested that the NRC amend the COLs for VEGP, Units 3 and 4, COLs NPF-91 and NPF-92. The proposed amendment is described in Section I of this Federal Register notice.

The Commission has determined for these amendments that the application complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commissions rules and regulations. The Commission has 6

made appropriate findings as required by the Act and the Commissions rules and regulations in 10 CFR chapter I, which are set forth in the license amendment.

A notice of consideration of issuance of amendment to facility operating license or combined license, as applicable, proposed no significant hazards consideration determination, and opportunity for a hearing in connection with these actions, was published in the Federal Register on October 24, 2017 (82 FR 49234). No comments were received during the 30-day comment period.

The Commission has determined that these amendments satisfy the criteria for categorical exclusion in accordance with 10 CFR 51.22. Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared for these amendments.

IV. Conclusion Using the reasons set forth in the combined safety evaluation, the staff granted the exemption and issued the amendment that the licensee requested on August 31, 2017, and supplemented on February 9, 2018 and March 8, 2018.

7

The exemptions and amendments were issued on April 20, 2018, as part of a combined package to the licensee (ADAMS Accession No. ML18085A620).

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 19th day of June, 2018.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

/RA/

Jennifer L. Dixon-Herrity, Chief, Licensing Branch 4, Division of Licensing, Siting, and Environmental Analysis, Office of New Reactors.

8