ML18264A195

Task Order No. 31310018F0079 Under Contract No. NRC-HQ-25-14-E-0006

ML18264A195
Person / Time
Issue date:	09/21/2018
From:	Jeffrey Mitchell Acquisition Management Division
To:	Information Systems Labs
References
NRC-HQ-25-14-E-0006
Download: ML18264A195 (18)

Text

PAGE OF PAGES ORDER FOR SUPPLIES OR SERVICES IMPORTANT: Mark all packages and papers with contract and/or order numbers. 1 18

1. DATE OF ORDER 2. CONTRACT NO. (If any) 6. SHIP TO:

NRC-HQ-25-14-E-0006

a. NAME OF CONSIGNEE

3. ORDER NO. 4. REQUISITION/REFERENCE NO.

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 31310018F0079 NRO-18-0062

5. ISSUING OFFICE (Address correspondence to) b. STREET ADDRESS US NRC - HQ NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT DIVISION MAIL STOP TWFN-07B20M JEFFREY R MITCHELL 301-415-5074 WASHINGTON DC 20555-0001 c. CITY d. STATE e. ZIP CODE WASHINGTON DC 20555-0001

7. TO: f. SH P VIA

a. NAME OF CONTRACTOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS LABORATORIES INC 8. TYPE OF ORDER

b. COMPANY NAME

a. PURCHASE X b. DELIVERY

c. STREET ADDRESS REFERENCE YOUR:

11140 ROCKVILLE PIKE Except for billing instructions on the reverse, this delivery order is subject to instructions contained on this side only of this form and is issued Please furnish the following on the terms subject to the terms and conditions and conditions specified on both sides of of the above-numbered contract.

d. CITY e. STATE f. Z P CODE this order and on the attached sheet, if any, ROCKVILLE including delivery as indicated.

MD 20852-3106

9. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA 10. REQUISITION NG OFFICE See Schedule OFFICE OF NEW REACTORS

11. BUS NESS CLASS FICATION (Check appropriate box(es)) 12. F.O B. POINT

a. SMALL X b. OTHER THAN SMALL c. DISADVANTAGED d. WOMEN-OWNED e. HUBZone

f. SERVICE-DISABLED g. WOMEN-OWNED SMALL BUS NESS (WOSB)

h. EDWOSB VETERAN-OWNED ELIGIBLE UNDER THE WOSB PROGRAM

13. PLACE OF 14. GOVERNMENT B/L NO. 15. DELIVER TO F.O B. POINT 16. DISCOUNT TERMS ON OR BEFORE (Date)

a. INSPECTION b. ACCEPTANCE 02/28/2020 Destination Destination 30

17. SCHEDULE (See reverse for Rejections)

QUANTITY UNIT QUANTITY ITEM NO. SUPPLIES OR SERVICES ORDERED UNIT PRICE AMOUNT ACCEPTED (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)

The NRC hereby awards task order NRC-HQ-25-14-E-0006/31310018F0079 entitled "Integrated Reactor Effluents and Dose Code System."

Continued ...

18. SHIPPING POINT 19. GROSS SHIPPING WEIGHT 20. INVOICE NO. 17(h)

TOTAL (Cont.

pages)

21. MAIL INVOICE TO:

a. NAME $0.00 US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION SEE BILLING INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE

b. STREET ADDRESS ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH (or P.O. Box) 11555 ROCKVILLE PIKE 17(i)

GRAND MAILSTOP O3-E17A TOTAL

c. CITY d. STATE e. Z P CODE

$397,161.00 ROCKVILLE MD 20852-2738

22. UNITED STATES OF 23. NAME (Typed) 09/21/2018 AMERICA BY (Signature) JEFFREY R. MITCHELL TITLE: CONTRACTING/ORDER NG OFFICER AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION OPTIONAL FORM 347 (Rev. 2/2012)

PREVIOUS EDITION NOT USABLE Prescribed by GSA/FAR 48 CFR 53.213(f)

ORDER FOR SUPPLIES OR SERVICES PAGE NO SCHEDULE - CONTINUATION 2 MPORTANT: Mark all packages and papers with contract and/or order numbers.

DATE OF ORDER CONTRACT NO. ORDER NO.

NRC-HQ-25-14-E-0006 31310018F0079 ITEM NO. SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT AMOUNT QUANTITY ORDERED PRICE ACCEPTED (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)

Total Obligated Amount: $125,000.00 Total Estimated Cost: $397,161.00 Acceptance of 31310018F0079 should be made by having an official, authorized to bind your organization.

ISL Authorized Official Date Accounting Info:

2018-X0200-FEEBASED-25-25D005-1030-17-4-151-251B-17-4-151-1030 Period of Performance: 10/01/2018 to 02/28/2020 TOTAL CARR ED FORWARD TO 1ST PAGE (ITEM 17(H)) $0.00 AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPODUCTION OPTIONAL FORM 348 (Rev. 4/2006)

PREVIOUS EDITION NOT USABLE Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.213(f)

NRC-HQ-25-14-E-0006 31310018F0079 SECTION B - Supplies or Services/Prices B.1 BRIEF PROJECT TITLE AND WORK DESCRIPTION (a) The title of this project is: Integrated Reactor Effluents and Dose Code System (b) Summary work description: The objective of this task order is to obtain technical expertise to assist the NRC staff in the update to GALE86 and integrate it with the updated NRCDose code (End of Clause)

B.2 CONSIDERATION AND OBLIGATION-TASK ORDERS (a) The ceiling of this order for services is $397,161.00.

(b) This order is subject to the minimum and maximum ordering requirements set forth in the contract.

(c) The amount presently obligated with respect to this order is $125,000.00 of which the sum of $105,894.00 represents the estimated reimbursable costs, and of which

$19,106.00 represents the fixed-fee. The obligated amount shall, at no time, exceed the order ceiling as specified in paragraph (a) above. When and if the amount(s) paid and payable to the Contractor hereunder shall equal the obligated amount, the Contractor shall not be obligated to continue performance of the work unless and until the Contracting Officer shall increase the amount obligated with respect to this order, in accordance with FAR Part 43 - Modifications. Any work undertaken by the Contractor in excess of the obligated amount specified above is done so at the Contractor's sole risk and may not be reimbursed by the Government.

(d) The Contractor shall comply with the provisions of FAR 52.232 Limitation of Funds, for incrementally-funded delivery orders or task orders.

(End of clause)

Page 1

B.3 PRICE/COST SCHEDULE CLIN DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED COST 0001 Prime Contractor Labor 0002 Subcontractor Cost including Subcontractor Overhead 0003 Other Direct Cost Subtotal 0004 Indirect Cost Pool (includes G&A, Fringe, Overhead and Subcontractor Handling)

Subtotal $378,055.00 0005 Fixed-Fee $19,106.00 Total Estimated Cost $397,161.00 Page 2

SECTION C - Description/Specifications C.1 STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW)

1. PROJECT TITLE Integrated Reactor Effluents and Dose Code System

2. BACKGROUND GALE86 is an industry standard code, developed by the NRC in 1980s, used for calculating normal radioactive liquid and gaseous effluent releases from large-light water reactors (LWRs) based on methods described in NRC Regulatory Guides (RGs) and NUREGs. The GALE86 code is considered an acceptable method by the NRC staff for demonstrating compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I. Although past attempts were made to update the GALE86 code, a version that is user friendly, robust, and flexible for application submittals and NRC staff reviews of LWRs has not yet been endorsed for reactor licensing. Further, the current GALE86 code and its interim updated versions were not developed to evaluate small modular and advanced reactor designs.

Information Systems Laboratories, Inc., Chesapeake Nuclear Services is currently working to update the NRCDose code under Enterprise-Wide Contract No. NRC-HQ-25-14-E-0006, Order No. NRC-HQ-25-16-T-0001. The NRCDose code calculates atmospheric dispersion and deposition factors, and liquid and gaseous doses from radioactivity released in reactor effluents to the environment (i.e., GALE86 code) based on methods described in RGs and NUREGs.

This new work is needed to provide an effective and efficient licensing tool that will assist applicants, licensees, and the NRC staff in calculating source terms, effluent releases, and exposure pathway doses for anticipated small modular and advance reactor design applications submitted for NRC review and approval. Because the design functions and features of this integrated code system will be robust and flexible, it may be also used for LWRs and power uprates for NRC licensed LWRs as an acceptable replacement to the GALE86 code.

Use of this integrated code system will be considered as an acceptable method to demonstrate compliance with the NRCs regulations in 10 CFR Part 20 and Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50, and the EPAs regulations in 40 CFR Part 190.

3. SCOPE OF WORK The objective of this task order is to obtain technical expertise from the contractor to assist the NRC staff in the update to GALE86 and integrate it with the updated NRCDose code from Contract No. NRC-HQ-25-14-E-0006, Order No. NRC-HQ 16-T-0001 under the same GUI for an Integrated Reactor Effluents and Dose Code System. The contractor will perform this work under the direction of the NRC staff in the Radiation Protection and Accident Consequences Branch (RPAC), Division of Division of Site Safety & Environmental Analysis (DSEA) in the NRC Office of New Reactors (NRO).

As part of this task order the contractor will provide an update to the GALE86 code including, but not limited to: improving the GUI and format to more clearly present parameters, assumptions and results; improving the file structure for saving and retrieving inputs/outputs and print options; easier method for user-defined (i.e., fully Page 3

from Boiling-Water Reactors and Pressurized-Water Reactors to Support Design Certification and Combined License Applications, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, July 2008.

NUREG-0016, Revision 1, "Calculation of Releases of Radioactive Materials in Gaseous and Liquid Effluents from Boiling Water Reactors (BWR-GALE Code),"

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, January 1979.

NUREG-0017, Calculation of Releases of Radioactive Materials in Gaseous and Liquid Effluents from Pressurized Water Reactors (PWR-GALE Code), U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, April 1976.

NUREG-0017, Revision 1, Calculation of Releases of Radioactive Materials in Gaseous and Liquid Effluents from Pressurized Water Reactors (PWR-GALE Code), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, April 1985.

NUREG/BR-0167, Software Quality Assurance Program and Guidelines, U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, February 1993.

NUREG/CR-0140, In-Plant Source Term Measurements at Fort Calhoun Station, Unit 1, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, July 1978.

NUREG/CR-0715, In-Plant Source Term Measurements at Zion Station, U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, February 1979.

NUREG/CR-1629, In-Plant Source Term Measurements at Turkey Point Station

- Unit 3 and 4. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, September 1980.

NUREG/CR-4397, In-Plant Source Term Measurements at Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Station, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, September 1985.

NUREG/CR-2348, In-Plant Source Term Measurements at Rancho Seco Station, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, October 1981.

NUREG-75/087, Revision 1, Containment Isolation System, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC, September 1975.

NUREG/CR-0143, The Use of Ion Exchange to Treat Radioactive Liquids in Light-Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, August 1978.

NUREG/CR-0142, The Use of Evaporation to Treat Radioactive Liquids in Light-Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, September 1978.

NUREG/CR-0141, The Use of Filtration to Treat Radioactive Liquids in Light-Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, September 1978.

NUREG/CR-0724, A Study of Reverse Osmosis Applicability to Light Water Reactor Radwaste Processing," U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, November 1978.

Regulatory Guide 1.140, Revision 1, Design, Testing, and Maintenance Criteria for Normal Ventilation Exhaust System Air Filtration and Adsorption Units of Page 8

Light-Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, October 1979.

Regulatory Guide 1.140, Revision 2, Design, Testing, and Maintenance Criteria for Normal Ventilation Exhaust System Air Filtration and Adsorption Units of Light-Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, June 2001.

Regulatory Guide 1.143, Revision 2, Design Guidance for Radioactive Waste Management Systems, Structures, and Components Installed in Light-Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, November 2001.

Other Documents ANSI/ANS-18.1-1984, American Nuclear Society Standard Radioactive Source Term for Normal Operation of Light Water Reactors, American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, Illinois, January 1984.

ANSI/ANS-18.1-1999, American Nuclear Society Standard Radioactive Source Term for Normal Operation of Light Water Reactors, American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, Illinois, September 1999.

ANSI/ANS-18.1-2016, American Nuclear Society Standard Radioactive Source Term for Normal Operation of Light Water Reactors, American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, Illinois, November 2016.

ANSI/ANS-55.6-1979, American National Standard Liquid Radioactive Waste Processing System for Light Water Reactor Plants, American National Standards Institute, La Grange Park, Illinois, September 1979.

ANSI/ANS-55.6-1993R, American Nuclear Society Standard for Liquid Radioactive Waste Processing System for Light Water Reactor Plants, American National Standards Institute, La Grange Park, Illinois, May 2007.

Blake EM, U.S. capacity factors: Can older reactors keep up the pace?, Nuclear News, Volume 52, Number 6, Pages 29 - 33, May 2009.

DOE/EIA-0384, U.S. Energy Information Administration - Annual Energy Review 2009, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, August 2010.

EPRI NP-939, Sources of Radioiodine at Pressurized Water Reactors, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California, November 1978.

EPRI-TR-105715, Characterization of Carbon-14 Generated by the Nuclear Power Industry, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California November 1995.

PNNL-18150, Sensitivity Analysis of Hardwired Parameters in GALE Codes, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, December 2008.

PNNL-18957, Recommended Updates to GALE Reactor Effluent Codes, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, November 2009.

PNNL-21386, Applicability of GALE-86 Codes to Integral Pressurized Water Reactor Designs, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, May 2012.

Page 9

PNNL-24249, Software Quality Assurance Plan: Support for the Gaseous and Liquid Effluent (GALE) Computer Code Project, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, April 2015.

PNNL-24250, Support for the Gaseous and Liquid Effluent (GALE) Computer Code Project: Configuration Management & Maintenance Plan, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, April 2015.

PNNL-26984, GALE-3.0 Verification Report, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, Draft completed September 2017 [to be published?].

Yim M-S and Caron F, Life cycle and management of carbon-14 from nuclear power generation, Progress in Nuclear Energy, Volume 48, Issue 1, Pages 2-36, January 2006.

5. DELIVERABLES AND DELIVERY SCHEDULE/REPORTING REQUIREMENTS All items to be delivered or milestones to be achieved are identified in 4. SPECIFIC TASKS. The deliverables shall be submitted to the NRC COR. Unless otherwise directed by the NRC CO or COR, the contractor must provide all deliverables except the Monthly Letter Status Reports as draft products. The NRC COR will review all draft deliverables (and coordinate any internal NRC staff review, if needed) and provide comments back to the contractor. The contractor shall revise the draft deliverable based on the comments provided by the NRC COR and then deliver a revised version of the deliverable, which will then be considered the final version.

When mutually-agreed upon between the contractor and the NRC COR, the contractor may submit preliminary or partial drafts to help gauge the contractors understanding of the particular work requirement. More than one round of drafts may be needed if the contractor does not successfully incorporate the NRC CORs comments on the previous draft deliverables. The contractor shall develop (as necessary), maintain, and control data, files, information, and deliverables pursuant to this task order.

6. GOVERNMENT-FURNISHED PROPERTY N/A

7. PLACE OF PERFORMANCE All work shall be performed at the contractors site.

8. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS TRAVEL/MEETINGS Any contractor travel (if needed) for task 1 will require written approval from the NRC COR.

SECURITY Work on this task order will not involve the handling of proprietary information.

9. DATA RIGHTS Page 10

The NRC shall have unlimited rights to and ownership of all deliverables provided under this contract/order, including the updated GUI and NRC codes, reports, recommendations, briefings, work plans and all other deliverables. All documents and materials, to include the source codes of any software, produced under this contract/order are the property of the Government with all rights and privileges of ownership/copyright belonging exclusively to the Government. These documents and materials may not be used or sold by the contractor without written authorization from the NRC CO. All materials supplied to the Government shall be the sole property of the Government and may not be used for any other purpose. This right does not abrogate any other Government rights. The definition of unlimited rights is contained in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 27.401, Definitions. FAR clause at FAR 52.227-14, Rights in Data-General, is hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this contract/order.

10. REQUIRED LABOR CATEGORIES The labor categories with the minimum technical qualifications of key personnel are presented in the table below. In addition, to meet the objectives of the work specified in this task order, the contractor must provide individuals who have experience and working knowledge of key NRC regulations and guidance.

Note 1: Sr. Tech Reviewer must have the following qualifications:

Demonstrated experience (at least 10 years) in NRC licensing reviews for new reactors to assess conformance with NRC guidance and compliance with NRC regulations, reactor effluents, RG 1.109 exposure pathway models, ICRP dose methodologies, and the As Low As is Reasonably Achievable design objectives in 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I.

Demonstrated experience (at least 10 years) in using the GALE86 and WinGALE86 codes to perform calculations of reactor effluents (liquid and gaseous) including setting up analyses, data input, running code, generating associated reports, and describing and interpretation of results.

Demonstrated experience (at least 10 years) in using NRCDose with XOQDOQ, LADTAP II, and GASPAR II codes to perform dose calculations of liquid and gaseous effluents including setting up analyses, data input, running code, generating associated reports, and describing and interpretation of results.

Note 2: Technical staff must have the following qualifications in addition to the qualifications in Note 1 for Technical Staff:

Demonstrated experience (at least 10 years) in computer code programming (e.g., Fortran, C++, Visual Basic), Microsoft (MS) Access, information technology and software to include Internet Explorer, Microsoft Word, Microsoft Excel, and GUI development under MS Windows using the WinGALE86 and NRCDose with XOQDOQ, LADTAP II, and GASPAR II codes.

Page 11

SECTION F - Deliveries or Performance F.1 PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE This contract shall commence on October 1, 2018 and will expire on February 28, 2020.

(End of Clause)

Page 12

SECTION H - Special Contract Requirements H.1 KEY PERSONNEL. (JAN 1993) 2052.215-70 Key personnel. (JAN 1993)

As prescribed at 2015.209-70(a)(1), the contracting officer shall insert in solicitations and contracts the following clause as applicable to the requirement:

KEY PERSONNEL (JAN 1993)

(a) The following individuals are considered to be essential to the successful performance of the work hereunder:

NAME Labor Category/Position Senior Technical Review Senior Technical Review Technical Reviewer The contractor agrees that personnel may not be removed from the contract work or replaced without compliance with paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.

(b) If one or more of the key personnel, for whatever reason, becomes, or is expected to become, unavailable for work under this contract for a continuous period exceeding 30 work days, or is expected to devote substantially less effort to the work than indicated in the proposal or initially anticipated, the contractor shall immediately notify the contracting officer and shall, subject to the concurrence of the contracting officer, promptly replace the personnel with personnel of at least substantially equal ability and qualifications.

(c) Each request for approval of substitutions must be in writing and contain a detailed explanation of the circumstances necessitating the proposed substitutions. The request must also contain a complete resume for the proposed substitute and other information requested or needed by the contracting officer to evaluate the proposed substitution.

The contracting officer and the project officer shall evaluate the contractor's request and the contracting officer shall promptly notify the contractor of his or her decision in writing.

(d) If the contracting officer determines that suitable and timely replacement of key personnel who have been reassigned, terminated, or have otherwise become unavailable for the contract work is not reasonably forthcoming, or that the resultant reduction of productive effort would be so substantial as to impair the successful completion of the contract or the service order, the contract may be terminated by the contracting officer for default or for the convenience of the Government, as appropriate.

If the contracting officer finds the contractor at fault for the condition, the contract price or fixed fee may be equitably adjusted downward to compensate the Government for any resultant delay, loss, or damage.

(End of Clause)

H.2 CONTRACTING OFFICERS REPRESENTATIVE (a) The contracting officer's authorized representative hereinafter referred to as the Contracting Officers Representative (COR) for this contract is:

Page 13

(f) If, in the opinion of the contractor, any instruction or direction issued by the COR is within one of the categories defined in paragraph (c) of this section, the contractor may not proceed but shall notify the contracting officer in writing within five (5) working days after the receipt of any instruction or direction and shall request that contracting officer to modify the contract accordingly. Upon receiving the notification from the contractor, the contracting officer shall issue an appropriate contract modification or advise the contractor in writing that, in the contracting officer's opinion, the technical direction is within the scope of this article and does not constitute a change under the "Changes" clause.

(g) Any unauthorized commitment or direction issued by the COR may result in an unnecessary delay in the contractor's performance and may even result in the contractor expending funds for unallowable costs under the contract.

(h) A failure of the parties to agree upon the nature of the instruction or direction or upon the contract action to be taken with respect to the instruction or direction is subject to 52.233 Disputes.

(i) In addition to providing technical direction as defined in paragraph (b) of the section, the project officer shall:

(1) Monitor the contractor's technical progress, including surveillance and assessment of performance, and recommend to the contracting officer changes in requirements.

(2) Assist the contractor in the resolution of technical problems encountered during performance.

(3) Review all costs requested for reimbursement by the contractor and submit to the contracting officer recommendations for approval, disapproval, or suspension of payment for supplies and services required under this contract.

(End of Clause)

Page 15

SECTION J - List of Documents, Exhibits and Other Attachments J.1 List of Documents, Exhibits, and Other Attachments Attachments:

1. Monthly Letter Status Report Template (Furnished Upon Request)

2. Cost Reimbursement Billing Instructions (Furnished Upon Request)

Page 16