NUREG-2154, Acknowledgement Letter to Confirm Receipt of April 22, 2013, Nuclear Energy Institute Comment Letter on Draft NUREG-2154, Acceptability of Corrective Action Programs for Fuel Cycle Facilities: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 08/19/2013 | | issue date = 08/19/2013 | ||
| title = Acknowledgement Letter to Confirm Receipt of April 22, 2013, Nuclear Energy Institute Comment Letter on Draft NUREG-2154, Acceptability of Corrective Action Programs for Fuel Cycle Facilities | | title = Acknowledgement Letter to Confirm Receipt of April 22, 2013, Nuclear Energy Institute Comment Letter on Draft NUREG-2154, Acceptability of Corrective Action Programs for Fuel Cycle Facilities | ||
| author name = Bailey M | | author name = Bailey M | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NMSS/FCSS | | author affiliation = NRC/NMSS/FCSS | ||
| addressee name = Schlueter J | | addressee name = Schlueter J | ||
| addressee affiliation = Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) | | addressee affiliation = Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) | ||
| docket = | | docket = | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| page count = 3 | | page count = 3 | ||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:August 19, 2013 Ms. Janet R. Schlueter, Director Fuel and Material Safety Nuclear Generation Division Nuclear Energy Institute 1201 F Street, NW, Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20004 | |||
==SUBJECT:== | |||
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT LETTER TO CONFIRM RECEIPT OF APRIL 22, 2013, NUCLEAR ENERGY INSTITUTE COMMENT LETTER ON DRAFT NUREG-2154, ACCEPTABILITY OF CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAMS FOR FUEL CYCLE FACILITIES | |||
==Dear Ms. Schlueter:== | |||
This letter is in response to your letter, dated April 22, 2013, providing comments on draft NUREG-2154, Acceptability of Corrective Action Programs for Fuel Cycle Facilities (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System [ADAMS] Accession Number ML13133A219). The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) appreciates the Nuclear Energy Institutes (NEI) interest in the development of corrective action programs (CAPs) at fuel cycle facilities and has carefully reviewed the letter and its enclosure. | |||
In the letter and its attachment, NEI suggested that the NRC consider converting the draft NUREG to a regulatory guide (RG) because an RG is typically the primary source of information for licensees and applicants filing for a license or requesting a licensing action (Recommendation 1). Further, during an April 11, 2013, public meeting held in Atlanta, GA (ADAMS Accession No. ML13113A251), members of industry identified that the burden of enhancing their existing CAP could be eased if applicants and licensees were able to commit to a set of CAP requirements rather than undertake the process of submitting a written CAP for NRC review and approval. | |||
The NRC staff has reviewed Recommendation 1 and has decided to move forward with the development of a regulatory guide for fuel cycle facility CAPs. Regulatory guides provide guidance to licensees and applicants on implementing specific parts of the NRC's regulations. | |||
The NRC staff has determined that an RG can effectively describe measures for establishing a CAP that satisfies the provisions of Section 2.3.2 of the NRC Enforcement Policy (ADAMS Accession No. ML12340A295). On July 30, 2013, the NRC staff withdrew draft NUREG-2154 and is taking steps to issue a draft RG to describe methods and procedures that the staff considers acceptable when developing CAPs for fuel cycle facilities. The draft RG, DG-3044, Corrective Action Programs for Fuel Cycle Facilities, will be issued for public comment. | |||
In the letter and its attachment, NEI also proposed an alternative approach to the license amendment process described in draft NUREG-2154 (Recommendation 2). | |||
J. Schlueter 2 The alternative approach recommended that, in lieu of an amendment request, licensees would be allowed to request in writing that NRC conduct a review and/or inspection of a facilitys CAP against the final NUREG-2154. The licensee would then, based on the findings or recommendations identified during the NRC inspection of its CAP, make an informed decision as to whether or how to modify the existing CAP to gain NRC approval. | |||
The NRC staff has reviewed Recommendation 2 and has determined that the NRC will only inspect CAP adequacy after (1) the licensee has a CAP commitment in its license (i.e., a commitment to the RG issued in accordance with Recommendation 1 above), and (2) the licensee has requested NRC inspection of its CAP implementation after having evaluated the adequacy of its CAP and determining that it meets the RG. This approach will ensure the most effective use of both licensee and NRC resources. | |||
The NRC staff will issue a publicly available comment resolution table that describes the staffs resolution of these and other comments and recommendations related to draft NUREG-2154. | |||
Further, we look forward to continued discussions related to CAPs for fuel cycle facilities as we develop Draft Guide 3044 and other guidance related to CAP adequacy. | |||
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 2.390(d) of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System component of NRCs document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | |||
If you have any questions, please contact Sabrina Atack of my staff at (301) 287-9075, or via e-mail at Sabrina.Atack@nrc.gov. | |||
Sincerely, | |||
/RA/ | |||
Marissa G. Bailey, Director Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards | |||
J. Schlueter 2 The alternative approach recommended that, in lieu of an amendment request, licensees would be allowed to request in writing that NRC conduct a review and/or inspection of a facilitys CAP against the final NUREG-2154. The licensee would then, based on the findings or recommendations identified during the NRC inspection of its CAP, make an informed decision as to whether or how to modify the existing CAP to gain NRC approval. | |||
The NRC staff has reviewed Recommendation 2 and has determined that the NRC will only inspect CAP adequacy after (1) the licensee has a CAP commitment in its license (i.e., a commitment to the RG issued in accordance with Recommendation 1 above), and (2) the licensee has requested NRC inspection of its CAP implementation after having evaluated the adequacy of its CAP and determining that it meets the RG. This approach will ensure the most effective use of both licensee and NRC resources. | |||
The NRC staff will issue a publicly available comment resolution table that describes the staffs resolution of these and other comments and recommendations related to draft NUREG-2154. | |||
Further, we look forward to continued discussions related to CAPs for fuel cycle facilities as we develop Draft Guide 3044 and other guidance related to CAP adequacy. | |||
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 2.390(d) of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System component of NRCs document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | |||
If you have any questions, please contact Sabrina Atack of my staff at (301) 287-9075, or via e-mail at Sabrina.Atack@nrc.gov. | |||
Sincerely, | |||
/RA/ | |||
Marissa G. Bailey, Director Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards DISTRIBUTION: | |||
FCSS r/f CHaney, NMSS SMoore, NMSS JAndersen, FCSS MSimon, OGC KCozens, NMSS ML13148A079 OFFICE FCSS/PORSB FCSS/FMB FCSS/PORSB FCSS NAME SAtack TBrockington MFranovich MBailey DATE 5/29/13 5/29/13 8/14/13 8/19/13 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY}} | |||
Latest revision as of 13:31, 5 December 2019
| ML13148A079 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 08/19/2013 |
| From: | Marissa Bailey NRC/NMSS/FCSS |
| To: | Schlueter J Nuclear Energy Institute |
| Atack S | |
| References | |
| Download: ML13148A079 (3) | |
Text
August 19, 2013 Ms. Janet R. Schlueter, Director Fuel and Material Safety Nuclear Generation Division Nuclear Energy Institute 1201 F Street, NW, Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20004
SUBJECT:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT LETTER TO CONFIRM RECEIPT OF APRIL 22, 2013, NUCLEAR ENERGY INSTITUTE COMMENT LETTER ON DRAFT NUREG-2154, ACCEPTABILITY OF CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAMS FOR FUEL CYCLE FACILITIES
Dear Ms. Schlueter:
This letter is in response to your letter, dated April 22, 2013, providing comments on draft NUREG-2154, Acceptability of Corrective Action Programs for Fuel Cycle Facilities (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System [ADAMS] Accession Number ML13133A219). The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) appreciates the Nuclear Energy Institutes (NEI) interest in the development of corrective action programs (CAPs) at fuel cycle facilities and has carefully reviewed the letter and its enclosure.
In the letter and its attachment, NEI suggested that the NRC consider converting the draft NUREG to a regulatory guide (RG) because an RG is typically the primary source of information for licensees and applicants filing for a license or requesting a licensing action (Recommendation 1). Further, during an April 11, 2013, public meeting held in Atlanta, GA (ADAMS Accession No. ML13113A251), members of industry identified that the burden of enhancing their existing CAP could be eased if applicants and licensees were able to commit to a set of CAP requirements rather than undertake the process of submitting a written CAP for NRC review and approval.
The NRC staff has reviewed Recommendation 1 and has decided to move forward with the development of a regulatory guide for fuel cycle facility CAPs. Regulatory guides provide guidance to licensees and applicants on implementing specific parts of the NRC's regulations.
The NRC staff has determined that an RG can effectively describe measures for establishing a CAP that satisfies the provisions of Section 2.3.2 of the NRC Enforcement Policy (ADAMS Accession No. ML12340A295). On July 30, 2013, the NRC staff withdrew draft NUREG-2154 and is taking steps to issue a draft RG to describe methods and procedures that the staff considers acceptable when developing CAPs for fuel cycle facilities. The draft RG, DG-3044, Corrective Action Programs for Fuel Cycle Facilities, will be issued for public comment.
In the letter and its attachment, NEI also proposed an alternative approach to the license amendment process described in draft NUREG-2154 (Recommendation 2).
J. Schlueter 2 The alternative approach recommended that, in lieu of an amendment request, licensees would be allowed to request in writing that NRC conduct a review and/or inspection of a facilitys CAP against the final NUREG-2154. The licensee would then, based on the findings or recommendations identified during the NRC inspection of its CAP, make an informed decision as to whether or how to modify the existing CAP to gain NRC approval.
The NRC staff has reviewed Recommendation 2 and has determined that the NRC will only inspect CAP adequacy after (1) the licensee has a CAP commitment in its license (i.e., a commitment to the RG issued in accordance with Recommendation 1 above), and (2) the licensee has requested NRC inspection of its CAP implementation after having evaluated the adequacy of its CAP and determining that it meets the RG. This approach will ensure the most effective use of both licensee and NRC resources.
The NRC staff will issue a publicly available comment resolution table that describes the staffs resolution of these and other comments and recommendations related to draft NUREG-2154.
Further, we look forward to continued discussions related to CAPs for fuel cycle facilities as we develop Draft Guide 3044 and other guidance related to CAP adequacy.
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 2.390(d) of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System component of NRCs document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
If you have any questions, please contact Sabrina Atack of my staff at (301) 287-9075, or via e-mail at Sabrina.Atack@nrc.gov.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Marissa G. Bailey, Director Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
J. Schlueter 2 The alternative approach recommended that, in lieu of an amendment request, licensees would be allowed to request in writing that NRC conduct a review and/or inspection of a facilitys CAP against the final NUREG-2154. The licensee would then, based on the findings or recommendations identified during the NRC inspection of its CAP, make an informed decision as to whether or how to modify the existing CAP to gain NRC approval.
The NRC staff has reviewed Recommendation 2 and has determined that the NRC will only inspect CAP adequacy after (1) the licensee has a CAP commitment in its license (i.e., a commitment to the RG issued in accordance with Recommendation 1 above), and (2) the licensee has requested NRC inspection of its CAP implementation after having evaluated the adequacy of its CAP and determining that it meets the RG. This approach will ensure the most effective use of both licensee and NRC resources.
The NRC staff will issue a publicly available comment resolution table that describes the staffs resolution of these and other comments and recommendations related to draft NUREG-2154.
Further, we look forward to continued discussions related to CAPs for fuel cycle facilities as we develop Draft Guide 3044 and other guidance related to CAP adequacy.
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 2.390(d) of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System component of NRCs document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
If you have any questions, please contact Sabrina Atack of my staff at (301) 287-9075, or via e-mail at Sabrina.Atack@nrc.gov.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Marissa G. Bailey, Director Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards DISTRIBUTION:
FCSS r/f CHaney, NMSS SMoore, NMSS JAndersen, FCSS MSimon, OGC KCozens, NMSS ML13148A079 OFFICE FCSS/PORSB FCSS/FMB FCSS/PORSB FCSS NAME SAtack TBrockington MFranovich MBailey DATE 5/29/13 5/29/13 8/14/13 8/19/13 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY