ML18271A071: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 08/21/2018 | | issue date = 08/21/2018 | ||
| title = Task Order No. 31310018F0031 Under Interagency Agreement No. NRC-HQ-60-17-D-0005 | | title = Task Order No. 31310018F0031 Under Interagency Agreement No. NRC-HQ-60-17-D-0005 | ||
| author name = Nesmith S | | author name = Nesmith S | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/ADM/AMD | | author affiliation = NRC/ADM/AMD | ||
| addressee name = | | addressee name = | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:1. IAA NO. PAGE OF INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT 31310018F0031 1 2 | ||
: 2. ORDER NO. 3. REQUISITION NO. 4. SOLICITATION NO. | |||
: 2. ORDER NO. | RES-18-0266 | ||
: 5. EFFECTIVE DATE 6. AWARD DATE 7. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE 08/10/2018 08/07/2018 08/10/2018 TO 09/30/2020 | |||
: 8. SERVICING AGENCY 9. DELIVER TO ENERGY IDAHO OPERATIONS OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPT OF MICHELE GONZALEZ ALC: US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DUNS: 048105530 +4: OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH 1955 FREMONT AVE 11555 ROCKVILLE PIKE IDAHO FALLS ID 834021510 ROCKVILLE MD 20852 POC TELEPHONE NO. ( | |||
: 10. REQUESTING AGENCY 11. INVOICE OFFICE ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT DIVISION US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ALC: 31000001 ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH DUNS: 040535809 +4: | |||
US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 11555 ROCKVILLE PIKE ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH MAILSTOP O3-E17A 11555 ROCKVILLE PIKE ROCKVILLE MD 20852-2738 ROCKVILLE MD 20852-2738 POC Sandra Nesmith TELEPHONE NO. (301) 415-6836 | |||
: 12. ISSUING OFFICE 13. LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 US NRC - HQ ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT DIVISION MAIL STOP TWFN-07B20M WASHINGTON DC 20555-0001 14. PROJECT ID | |||
: 15. PROJECT TITLE NEW REACTORS AHZ SPAR MODELS | |||
: 16. ACCOUNTING DATA 2018-X0200-FEEBASED-60-60D002-60B205-1052-17-6-161-253D-17-6-161-1052 | |||
: 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. | |||
ITEM NO. SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT Agreement No. NRC-HQ-60-17-D-0005 Task Order No: 31310018F0031 | |||
==Title:== | |||
: | Task 9 - New Reactors All Hazard SPAR Models The NRC and Idaho National Laboratory (INL) hereby enter into this Agreement for the project entitled "Task 9 - New Reactors All Hazard SPAR Models." | ||
Continued ... | |||
: 23. PAYMENT PROVISIONS 24. TOTAL AMOUNT | |||
$300,000.00 25a. SIGNATURE OF GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE (SERVICING) 26a. SIGNATURE OF GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE (REQUESTING) 25b. NAME AND TITLE 25c. DATE 26b. CONTRACTING OFFICER 26c. DATE SANDRA R. NESMITH 8/21/18 | |||
IAA NO ORDER NO PAGE OF 31310018F0031 2 2 Period of Performance: August 10, 2018 - | |||
September 30, 2020 Consideration and Obligations: | September 30, 2020 Consideration and Obligations: | ||
(a) Authorized Cost Ceiling $533,879.00 (b) The amount presently obligated with respect to this DOE Agreement is $300,000.00. When and if the amount(s) paid and payable to the DOE Laboratory hereunder shall equal the obligated amount, the DOE Laboratory shall not be obligated to continue performance of the work unless and until the NRC Contracting Officer shall increase the amount obligated with respect to this DOE Agreement. Any work undertaken by the DOE Laboratory in excess of the obligated amount specified above is done so at the DOE | (a) Authorized Cost Ceiling $533,879.00 (b) The amount presently obligated with respect to this DOE Agreement is $300,000.00. When and if the amount(s) paid and payable to the DOE Laboratory hereunder shall equal the obligated amount, the DOE Laboratory shall not be obligated to continue performance of the work unless and until the NRC Contracting Officer shall increase the amount obligated with respect to this DOE Agreement. Any work undertaken by the DOE Laboratory in excess of the obligated amount specified above is done so at the DOE Laboratorys sole risk. | ||
The following documents are hereby made a part of this Agreement: | The following documents are hereby made a part of this Agreement: | ||
Attachment No. 1: Statement of Work This agreement is entered into pursuant to the authority of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended (42 U.S.C 5801 et seq.). This work will be performed in accordance with the NRC/DOE Memorandum of Understanding dated November 24, 1998. To the best of our knowledge, | Attachment No. 1: Statement of Work This agreement is entered into pursuant to the authority of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended (42 U.S.C 5801 et seq.). This work will be performed in accordance with the NRC/DOE Memorandum of Understanding dated November 24, 1998. To the best of our knowledge, the work requested will not place the DOE and its contractor in direct competition with the domestic private sector. | ||
Master IAA: NRCHQ6017D0005 00001 Authorized ceiling for new task order | Master IAA: NRCHQ6017D0005 00001 Authorized ceiling for new task order 533,879.00 Line Item Ceiling: $533,879.00 Incrementally Funded Amount: $300,000.00 The total amount of award: $533,879.00. The obligation for this award is shown in box 24. | ||
STATEMENT OF WORK NRC Agreement Number NRC Agreement | |||
STATEMENT OF WORK NRC Agreement Number NRC Agreement NRC Task Order Number NRC Task Order Modification Modification Number (If Applicable) Number (If Applicable) | |||
NRC-HQ-60-17-D0005 | NRC-HQ-60-17-D0005 31310018F0031 Project Title New Reactors AHZ SPAR Models Job Code Number B&R Number DOE Laboratory Idaho National Laboratory NRC Requisitioning Office Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research NRC Form 187, Contract Security and Classification Requirements Involves Proprietary Information Applicable Involves Sensitive Unclassified Not Applicable Non Fee-Recoverable Fee-Recoverable (If checked, complete all applicable sections below) | ||
Docket Number (If Fee-Recoverable/Applicable) Inspection Report Number (If Fee Recoverable/Applicable) | |||
-Recoverable/Applicable) | Technical Assignment Control Number (If Fee- Technical Assignment Control Number Description (If Fee-Recoverable/Applicable) Recoverable/Applicable) | ||
Inspection Report Number (If Fee Recoverable/Applicable | |||
- | |||
Technical Assignment Control Number Description (If Fee | |||
-Recoverable/Applicable) | |||
==1.0 BACKGROUND== | ==1.0 BACKGROUND== | ||
This project is in support of | This project is in support of NROs Research Assistance Request, New and Advanced Reactor Standardized Plan Analysis of Risk Model Development, dated April 20, 2018, (ML18110A798). Prior to new plant operation, the NRC staff may need to perform risk assessments to confirm probabilistic (PRA) results provided in combined license (COL) submittals or to evaluate risk-informed applications after COL issuance. The industry has indicated that additional risk-informed applications (e.g., 10 CFR 50.69, T/S) may be submitted after COL issuance. | ||
, | |||
). Prior to new plant operation, the NRC staff may need to perform risk assessments to confirm probabilistic (PRA) results provided in combined license (COL) submittals or to evaluate risk | |||
-informed applications after COL issuance. | |||
The industry has indicated that additional risk | |||
-informed applications (e.g., 10 CFR 50.69, T/S) may be submitted after COL issuance. | |||
Once the plants begin operation, the results from licensee PRAs or independent assessments using SPAR models may be used by the NRC staff for the evaluation of operational findings and events similar to the assessments performed for current operating reactors. Since the SPAR models are based (as much as possible) on standardized assumptions and data, they can also be used to compare the effects of design differences. | Once the plants begin operation, the results from licensee PRAs or independent assessments using SPAR models may be used by the NRC staff for the evaluation of operational findings and events similar to the assessments performed for current operating reactors. Since the SPAR models are based (as much as possible) on standardized assumptions and data, they can also be used to compare the effects of design differences. | ||
2.0 OBJECTIVE The main objective of this work is to develop a design | 2.0 OBJECTIVE The main objective of this work is to develop a design-specific all-hazards SPAR model for the Vogtle AP1000 reactor design, as specified by the project manager, based on the SAPHIRE software, version 8. As part of the SPAR model development, the requisite supporting documentation will also be included in the deliverable to NRO. Since design standardization is a key aspect of the new plants, this external event model will be based on the existing AP1000 IE SPAR model. Additional external events modules (i.e, internal fire, LPSD, seismic) could be included on this project as requested by the project manager. | ||
-specific all-hazards SPAR model for the Vogtle AP1000 reactor design, as specified by the project manager, based on the SAPHIRE software, version 8. As part of the SPAR model development, the requisite supporting documentation will also be included in the deliverable to NRO. Since design standardization is a key aspect of the new plants, this external event model will be based on the existing AP1000 IE SPAR model | 3.0 SCOPE OF WORK INL must provide all resources necessary to accomplish the tasks and deliverables described in this statement of work (SOW). | ||
. Additional external events modules (i.e, internal fire, LPSD, seismic) could be included on this project as requested by the project manager. | INL shall complete all hazards modelling for the existing AP1000 SPAR model as instructed by the COR. | ||
3.0 SCOPE OF WORK INL must provide all resources necessary to accomplish the tasks and deliverables described in this statement of work (SOW). | 4.0 SPECIFIC TASKS The DOE Laboratory must perform the following tasks: | ||
INL shall complete all hazards modelling for the existing AP1000 SPAR model as instructed by the COR. 4.0 SPECIFIC TASKS The DOE Laboratory must perform the following tasks: | Sub Task 1 Development of AP1000 Vogtle plant specific SPAR model 1.1 Develop an internal events SPAR model for the Vogtle Units 3 & 4 Using the documented PRA provided by the utility, construct an internal events SPAR model for Vogtle Units 3 and 4 starting with the AP1000 internal events SPAR Model. The model shall be developed to the same standardization criteria of the existing models, to the extent practicable. | ||
Sub Task 1 Development of AP1000 Vogtle plant specific SPAR model 1.1 | This includes model construct, event nomenclature, assumptions, preferred technical positions and other key aspects of the existing models to allow NRC staff the ease of use of the model. | ||
1.2 Develop an AHZ SPAR model for Vogtle Units 3 & 4 Using the AP1000 AHZ model and the documented PRA provided by the utility, construct an AHZ SPAR model. The model shall include internal flooding, internal fire and seismic modelling. The model shall be developed to the same standardization criteria of the existing models, to the extent practicable. This includes model construct, event nomenclature, assumptions, preferred technical positions and other key aspects of the existing models to allow NRC staff the ease of use of the model. | 1.2 Develop an AHZ SPAR model for Vogtle Units 3 & 4 Using the AP1000 AHZ model and the documented PRA provided by the utility, construct an AHZ SPAR model. The model shall include internal flooding, internal fire and seismic modelling. The model shall be developed to the same standardization criteria of the existing models, to the extent practicable. This includes model construct, event nomenclature, assumptions, preferred technical positions and other key aspects of the existing models to allow NRC staff the ease of use of the model. | ||
The modelling activities shall be done in accordance with the SPAR | The modelling activities shall be done in accordance with the SPAR -AHZ Model Makers Guidance and Volume 2 of the RASP Handbook. | ||
-AHZ Model | 1.3 Perform quality control and quality assurance reviews Monitor model development and perform quality reviews in accordance with the SPAR Model Quality Plan and the MMG. | ||
1.3 | |||
1.4 Compare results of the SPAR model to results provided by the utility. | 1.4 Compare results of the SPAR model to results provided by the utility. | ||
Compare the results of the new SPAR model to the results provided by the utility, using methods developed for the previous model comparisons. | Compare the results of the new SPAR model to the results provided by the utility, using methods developed for the previous model comparisons. | ||
1.5 Document the internal events model and the comparison of the results | 1.5 Document the internal events model and the comparison of the results. | ||
Document the model in the same format used for the existing SPAR model, to the extent practicable. Include in this documentation the results of the comparison between the SPAR model and the results provided by the vendor. | |||
Sub Task 2 | Sub Task 2 Provide Support to Other New Reactors SPAR Models 2.1 Review and finalize the AP1000 L2 and LPSD models to incorporate NROs review. | ||
2.2 Perform model maintenance and updates of the SPAR models as requested by the by the COR. | |||
5.0 DELIVERABLES AND/OR MILESTONES SCHEDULE Task # Milestone Final Deliverables Additional Comments (months after (months after project start) project start) 1 1.1 3 months after Document Vogtles internal events, and AHZ site visit and/or SPAR Model and the comparison to the 3 months after PRA information utilitys results (cut-set level). | |||
NROs review Final exchange internal events and Note: AHZ SPAR model will be dependent of 1.2 6 months after AHZ model the level of PRA information obtained from site visit and/or the licensee. | |||
-set level) | PRA information exchange 2 2.1 3 months after Final AHZ, L2, LPSD SPAR model NROs review 2.2 3 months after NROs request 6.0 TECHNICAL AND OTHER SPECIAL QUALIFICATIONS REQUIRED This activity requires PRA Analysts and Senior PRA Analysts who have a very strong technical background in PRA, intimate experience with SPAR models, and who are knowledgeable from a global standpoint of standardization which is crucial to the needs of the staff who use the models. Additionally, this activity requires a special understanding of how these modelling issues affect PRA quality. Site access will not be required to perform this activity. | ||
Site access will not be required to perform this activity. | |||
The following INL personnel have been identified as key personnel: | The following INL personnel have been identified as key personnel: | ||
7.0 MEETINGS AND TRAVEL Travel associated with this SOW is expected to be minimal, since attendance at most meetings will be via teleconference or video teleconference. A total of three (3) 1 person trips have been budgeted in anticipation of travel required in support of the work as described above. It is anticipated that one INL staff will attend each meeting and that each meeting typically lasts three days. The laboratory may suggest or propose addition, deletion, or substitution of meetings and/or trips. For planning and budgeting purposes, potential meeting places are NRC Headquarters , Rockville, MD. All travel requires written Government approval from the CO, unless otherwise delegated to the COR. Foreign travel for the DOE laboratory personnel requires a 60 | 7.0 MEETINGS AND TRAVEL Travel associated with this SOW is expected to be minimal, since attendance at most meetings will be via teleconference or video teleconference. A total of three (3) 1 person trips have been budgeted in anticipation of travel required in support of the work as described above. It is anticipated that one INL staff will attend each meeting and that each meeting typically lasts three days. | ||
-day lead time for NRC approval. For prior approval of foreign travel, the DOE laboratory shall submit an NRC Form 445, | The laboratory may suggest or propose addition, deletion, or substitution of meetings and/or trips. For planning and budgeting purposes, potential meeting places are NRC Headquarters, Rockville, MD. | ||
-rm/doc-collections/forms/. Foreign travel is approved by the NRC Executive Director for Operations (EDO). 8.0 REPORTING | All travel requires written Government approval from the CO, unless otherwise delegated to the COR. | ||
Document the SPAR model in the same format used for the existing SPAR model, to the extent practicable. Include in this documentation the results of the comparison between the SPAR model and the results provided by the vendor. Documentation shall be provided as an electronic manuscript, in Adobe Portable Document Format. The Contractor shall prepare the text in Microsoft Word, and use any of the file types allowed for preparation of NUREG | Foreign travel for the DOE laboratory personnel requires a 60-day lead time for NRC approval. | ||
-SERIES MANUSCRIPTS (see below). Paper documents are not required. | For prior approval of foreign travel, the DOE laboratory shall submit an NRC Form 445, Request for Approval of Official Foreign Travel. NRC Form 445 is available in the MD 11.7 Documents library and on the NRC Web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/forms/. Foreign travel is approved by the NRC Executive Director for Operations (EDO). | ||
Interim and final reports shall be provided in Adobe Acrobat Portable Document Format (PDF). Distribution of the interim reports shall be controlled by the PM/TM. | 8.0 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS As stated in the Scope of Work, the deliverables for this project consist of the following: | ||
Document the SPAR model in the same format used for the existing SPAR model, to the extent practicable. Include in this documentation the results of the comparison between the SPAR model and the results provided by the vendor. Documentation shall be provided as an electronic manuscript, in Adobe Portable Document Format. The Contractor shall prepare the text in Microsoft Word, and use any of the file types allowed for preparation of NUREG-SERIES MANUSCRIPTS (see below). Paper documents are not required. | |||
Interim and final reports shall be provided in Adobe Acrobat Portable Document Format (PDF). | |||
Distribution of the interim reports shall be controlled by the PM/TM. | |||
The DOE Laboratory is responsible for structuring the deliverable to follow agency standards. The current agency standard is Microsoft Office Suite 2010. The current agency Portable Document Format (PDF) standard is Adobe Acrobat 9 Professional. | The DOE Laboratory is responsible for structuring the deliverable to follow agency standards. | ||
Deliverables must be submitted free of spelling and grammatical errors and conform to requirements stated in this section. Monthly Letter Status Reports In accordance with Management Directive 11.7, NRC Procedures for Placement and Monitoring of Work with the U.S. Department of Energy, the DOE Laboratory must electronically submit a Monthly Letter Status Report (MLSR) by the | The current agency standard is Microsoft Office Suite 2010. The current agency Portable Document Format (PDF) standard is Adobe Acrobat 9 Professional. Deliverables must be submitted free of spelling and grammatical errors and conform to requirements stated in this section. | ||
The MLSR must include the following: agreement number; task order number, if applicable; job code number; title of the project; project period of performance; task order period of performance, if applicable; | Monthly Letter Status Reports In accordance with Management Directive 11.7, NRC Procedures for Placement and Monitoring of Work with the U.S. Department of Energy, the DOE Laboratory must electronically submit a Monthly Letter Status Report (MLSR) by the 20th day of each month to the Contracting Officer Representative (COR) with copies to the Contracting Officer (CO) and the Office Administration/Division of Contracts to ContractsPOT.Resource@nrc.gov. If a project is a task ordering agreement, a separate MLSR must be submitted for each task order with a summary project MLSR, even if no work has been performed during a reporting period. Once NRC has determined that all work on a task order is completed and that final costs are acceptable, a task order may be omitted from the MLSR. | ||
-mail address; full name and address of the performing organization; principal investigator's name, telephone number, and e | The MLSR must include the following: agreement number; task order number, if applicable; job code number; title of the project; project period of performance; task order period of performance, if applicable; CORs name, telephone number, and e-mail address; full name and address of the performing organization; principal investigator's name, telephone number, and e-mail address; and reporting period. | ||
-mail address; and reporting period. | 9.0 PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE The estimated period of performance for this work is August 10, 2018 - September 30, 2020. | ||
9.0 PERIOD OF | 10.0 CONTRACTING OFFICERS REPRESENTATIVE The COR monitors all technical aspects of the agreement/task order and assists in its administration. The COR is authorized to perform the following functions: assure that the DOE Laboratory performs the technical requirements of the agreement/task order; perform inspections necessary in connection with agreement/task order performance; maintain written and oral communications with the DOE Laboratory concerning technical aspects of the agreement/task order; issue written interpretations of technical requirements, including Government drawings, designs, specifications; monitor the DOE Laboratorys performance and notify the DOE Laboratory of any deficiencies; coordinate availability of NRC-furnished material and/or GFP; and provide site entry of DOE Laboratory personnel. | ||
- September 30, 2020. | Contracting Officers Representative Michelle. M Gonzalez Mail Stop C4A07M Washington, D. C. 20555-0001 Phone: (301) 415-5661 Fax: (301) 415-6671 Email: (michelle.gonzalez@nrc.gov) | ||
-furnished material and/or GFP; and provide site entry of DOE Laboratory personnel. | |||
Contracting | |||
-0001 Phone: (301) 415-5661 Fax: (301) 415-6671 Email: (michelle.gonzalez@nrc.gov) | |||
Alternate | Alternate Contracting Officers Representative Name: Suzanne Dennis Agency: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office: RES Mail Stop: T10A14 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-Mail: (suzanne.dennis@nrc.gov) | ||
T10A14 Washington, DC 20555 | Phone: (301) 415-7000 11.0 MATERIALS REQUIRED N/A 12.0 NRC-FURNISHED PROPERTY/MATERIALS Information to be provided by NRC: | ||
-0001 E-Mail: (suzanne.dennis@nrc.gov) | |||
Phone: (301) 415-7000 | |||
NRC will provide to INL the documented PRA and other associated documents provided to the NRC by the NSSS Vendor sufficient to develop the SPAR model. | NRC will provide to INL the documented PRA and other associated documents provided to the NRC by the NSSS Vendor sufficient to develop the SPAR model. | ||
13.0 RESEARCH QUALITY The quality of NRC research programs are assessed each year by the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards. Within the context of their reviews of RES programs, the definition of quality research is based upon several major characteristics: | 13.0 RESEARCH QUALITY The quality of NRC research programs are assessed each year by the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards. Within the context of their reviews of RES programs, the definition of quality research is based upon several major characteristics: | ||
Results meet the objectives (75% of overall score) | Results meet the objectives (75% of overall score) | ||
Justification of major assumptions (12%) | Justification of major assumptions (12%) | ||
Line 117: | Line 102: | ||
Clarity of presentation (16%) | Clarity of presentation (16%) | ||
Identification of major assumptions (9%) | Identification of major assumptions (9%) | ||
It is the responsibility of the DOE Laboratory to ensure that these quality criteria are adequately addressed throughout the course of the research that is performed. The NRC COR will review all research products with these criteria in mind | It is the responsibility of the DOE Laboratory to ensure that these quality criteria are adequately addressed throughout the course of the research that is performed. The NRC COR will review all research products with these criteria in mind. | ||
14.0 STANDARDS FOR CONTRACTORS WHO PREPARE NUREG | 14.0 STANDARDS FOR CONTRACTORS WHO PREPARE NUREG-SERIES MANUSCRIPTS The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) began to capture most of its official records electronically on January 1, 2000. The NRC will capture each final NUREG-series publication in its native application. Therefore, please submit your final manuscript that has been approved by your NRC Project Manager in both electronic and camera-ready copy. | ||
-SERIES MANUSCRIPTS The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) began to capture most of its official records electronically on January 1, 2000. The NRC will capture each final NUREG | The final manuscript shall be of archival quality and comply with the requirements of NRC Management Directive 3.7 NUREG-Series Publications. The document shall be technically edited consistent with NUREG-1379, Rev. 2 (May 2009) "NRC Editorial Style Guide." The goals of the "NRC Editorial Style Guide" are readability and consistency for all agency documents. | ||
-series publication in its native application. Therefore, please submit your final manuscript that has been approved by your NRC Project Manager in both electronic and camera | All format guidance, as specified in NUREG-0650, Preparing NUREG-Series Publications," | ||
-ready copy. | Rev. 2 (January 1999), will remain the same with one exception. You will no longer be required to include the NUREG-series designator on the bottom of each page of the manuscript. The NRC will assign this designator when we send the camera-ready copy to the printer and will place the designator on the cover, title page, and spine. The designator for each report will no longer be assigned when the decision to prepare a publication is made. The NRC's Publishing Services Branch will inform the NRC Project Manager for the publication of the assigned designator when the final manuscript is sent to the printer. | ||
The final manuscript shall be of archival quality and comply with the requirements of NRC Management Directive 3.7 | |||
-Series Publications. | |||
The document shall be technically edited consistent with NUREG | |||
-1379, Rev. 2 (May 2009) "NRC Editorial Style Guide." | |||
All format guidance, as specified in NUREG | |||
-0650, | |||
-Series Publications," Rev. 2 (January 1999), will remain the same with one exception. You will no longer be required to include the NUREG | |||
-series designator on the bottom of each page of the manuscript. The NRC will assign this designator when we send the camera | |||
-ready copy to the printer and will place the designator on the cover, title page, and spine. The designator for each report will no longer be assigned when the decision to prepare a publication is made. The NRC's Publishing Services Branch will inform the NRC Project Manager for the publication of the assigned designator when the final manuscript is sent to the printer. | |||
For the electronic manuscript, the Contractor shall prepare the text in Microsoft Word, and use any of the following file types for charts, spreadsheets, and the like. | For the electronic manuscript, the Contractor shall prepare the text in Microsoft Word, and use any of the following file types for charts, spreadsheets, and the like. | ||
File Types to be Used for NUREG | File Types to be Used for NUREG-Series Publications File Type File Extension MicrosoftWord .doc Microsoft PowerPoint .ppt MicrosoftExcel .xls MicrosoftAccess .mdb Portable Document Format .pdf This list is subject to change if new software packages come into common use at NRC or by our licensees or other stakeholders that participate in the electronic submission process. If a portion of your manuscript is from another source and you cannot obtain an acceptable electronic file type for this portion (e.g., an appendix from an old publication), the NRC can, if necessary, create a tagged image file format (file extension.tif) for that portion of your report. | ||
-Series Publications File Type File Extension MicrosoftWord | Note that you should continue to submit original photographs, which will be scanned, since digitized photographs do not print well. | ||
If you choose to publish a compact disk (CD) of your publication, place on the CD copies of the manuscript in both (1) a portable document format (PDF); (2) a Microsoft Word file format, and (3) an Adobe Acrobat Reader, or, alternatively, print instructions for obtaining a free copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader on the back cover insert of the jewel | If you choose to publish a compact disk (CD) of your publication, place on the CD copies of the manuscript in both (1) a portable document format (PDF); (2) a Microsoft Word file format, and (3) an Adobe Acrobat Reader, or, alternatively, print instructions for obtaining a free copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader on the back cover insert of the jewel box. | ||
15.0 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS N/A References N/A Access to Non-NRC Facilities/Equipment N/A Applicable Publications N/A Controls over document handling and non-disclosure of materials N/A}} | |||
-NRC Facilities/Equipment N/A | |||
-disclosure of materials N/A}} |
Latest revision as of 08:23, 30 November 2019
ML18271A071 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Issue date: | 08/21/2018 |
From: | Sandra Nesmith Acquisition Management Division |
To: | US Dept of Energy, Idaho Operations Office |
References | |
NRC-HQ-60-17-D-0005 | |
Download: ML18271A071 (10) | |
Text
1. IAA NO. PAGE OF INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT 31310018F0031 1 2
- 2. ORDER NO. 3. REQUISITION NO. 4. SOLICITATION NO.
RES-18-0266
- 5. EFFECTIVE DATE 6. AWARD DATE 7. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE 08/10/2018 08/07/2018 08/10/2018 TO 09/30/2020
- 8. SERVICING AGENCY 9. DELIVER TO ENERGY IDAHO OPERATIONS OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPT OF MICHELE GONZALEZ ALC: US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DUNS: 048105530 +4: OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH 1955 FREMONT AVE 11555 ROCKVILLE PIKE IDAHO FALLS ID 834021510 ROCKVILLE MD 20852 POC TELEPHONE NO. (
- 10. REQUESTING AGENCY 11. INVOICE OFFICE ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT DIVISION US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ALC: 31000001 ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH DUNS: 040535809 +4:
US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 11555 ROCKVILLE PIKE ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH MAILSTOP O3-E17A 11555 ROCKVILLE PIKE ROCKVILLE MD 20852-2738 ROCKVILLE MD 20852-2738 POC Sandra Nesmith TELEPHONE NO. (301) 415-6836
- 12. ISSUING OFFICE 13. LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 US NRC - HQ ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT DIVISION MAIL STOP TWFN-07B20M WASHINGTON DC 20555-0001 14. PROJECT ID
- 15. PROJECT TITLE NEW REACTORS AHZ SPAR MODELS
- 16. ACCOUNTING DATA 2018-X0200-FEEBASED-60-60D002-60B205-1052-17-6-161-253D-17-6-161-1052
- 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22.
ITEM NO. SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT Agreement No. NRC-HQ-60-17-D-0005 Task Order No: 31310018F0031
Title:
Task 9 - New Reactors All Hazard SPAR Models The NRC and Idaho National Laboratory (INL) hereby enter into this Agreement for the project entitled "Task 9 - New Reactors All Hazard SPAR Models."
Continued ...
- 23. PAYMENT PROVISIONS 24. TOTAL AMOUNT
$300,000.00 25a. SIGNATURE OF GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE (SERVICING) 26a. SIGNATURE OF GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE (REQUESTING) 25b. NAME AND TITLE 25c. DATE 26b. CONTRACTING OFFICER 26c. DATE SANDRA R. NESMITH 8/21/18
IAA NO ORDER NO PAGE OF 31310018F0031 2 2 Period of Performance: August 10, 2018 -
September 30, 2020 Consideration and Obligations:
(a) Authorized Cost Ceiling $533,879.00 (b) The amount presently obligated with respect to this DOE Agreement is $300,000.00. When and if the amount(s) paid and payable to the DOE Laboratory hereunder shall equal the obligated amount, the DOE Laboratory shall not be obligated to continue performance of the work unless and until the NRC Contracting Officer shall increase the amount obligated with respect to this DOE Agreement. Any work undertaken by the DOE Laboratory in excess of the obligated amount specified above is done so at the DOE Laboratorys sole risk.
The following documents are hereby made a part of this Agreement:
Attachment No. 1: Statement of Work This agreement is entered into pursuant to the authority of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended (42 U.S.C 5801 et seq.). This work will be performed in accordance with the NRC/DOE Memorandum of Understanding dated November 24, 1998. To the best of our knowledge, the work requested will not place the DOE and its contractor in direct competition with the domestic private sector.
Master IAA: NRCHQ6017D0005 00001 Authorized ceiling for new task order 533,879.00 Line Item Ceiling: $533,879.00 Incrementally Funded Amount: $300,000.00 The total amount of award: $533,879.00. The obligation for this award is shown in box 24.
STATEMENT OF WORK NRC Agreement Number NRC Agreement NRC Task Order Number NRC Task Order Modification Modification Number (If Applicable) Number (If Applicable)
NRC-HQ-60-17-D0005 31310018F0031 Project Title New Reactors AHZ SPAR Models Job Code Number B&R Number DOE Laboratory Idaho National Laboratory NRC Requisitioning Office Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research NRC Form 187, Contract Security and Classification Requirements Involves Proprietary Information Applicable Involves Sensitive Unclassified Not Applicable Non Fee-Recoverable Fee-Recoverable (If checked, complete all applicable sections below)
Docket Number (If Fee-Recoverable/Applicable) Inspection Report Number (If Fee Recoverable/Applicable)
Technical Assignment Control Number (If Fee- Technical Assignment Control Number Description (If Fee-Recoverable/Applicable) Recoverable/Applicable)
1.0 BACKGROUND
This project is in support of NROs Research Assistance Request, New and Advanced Reactor Standardized Plan Analysis of Risk Model Development, dated April 20, 2018, (ML18110A798). Prior to new plant operation, the NRC staff may need to perform risk assessments to confirm probabilistic (PRA) results provided in combined license (COL) submittals or to evaluate risk-informed applications after COL issuance. The industry has indicated that additional risk-informed applications (e.g., 10 CFR 50.69, T/S) may be submitted after COL issuance.
Once the plants begin operation, the results from licensee PRAs or independent assessments using SPAR models may be used by the NRC staff for the evaluation of operational findings and events similar to the assessments performed for current operating reactors. Since the SPAR models are based (as much as possible) on standardized assumptions and data, they can also be used to compare the effects of design differences.
2.0 OBJECTIVE The main objective of this work is to develop a design-specific all-hazards SPAR model for the Vogtle AP1000 reactor design, as specified by the project manager, based on the SAPHIRE software, version 8. As part of the SPAR model development, the requisite supporting documentation will also be included in the deliverable to NRO. Since design standardization is a key aspect of the new plants, this external event model will be based on the existing AP1000 IE SPAR model. Additional external events modules (i.e, internal fire, LPSD, seismic) could be included on this project as requested by the project manager.
3.0 SCOPE OF WORK INL must provide all resources necessary to accomplish the tasks and deliverables described in this statement of work (SOW).
INL shall complete all hazards modelling for the existing AP1000 SPAR model as instructed by the COR.
4.0 SPECIFIC TASKS The DOE Laboratory must perform the following tasks:
Sub Task 1 Development of AP1000 Vogtle plant specific SPAR model 1.1 Develop an internal events SPAR model for the Vogtle Units 3 & 4 Using the documented PRA provided by the utility, construct an internal events SPAR model for Vogtle Units 3 and 4 starting with the AP1000 internal events SPAR Model. The model shall be developed to the same standardization criteria of the existing models, to the extent practicable.
This includes model construct, event nomenclature, assumptions, preferred technical positions and other key aspects of the existing models to allow NRC staff the ease of use of the model.
1.2 Develop an AHZ SPAR model for Vogtle Units 3 & 4 Using the AP1000 AHZ model and the documented PRA provided by the utility, construct an AHZ SPAR model. The model shall include internal flooding, internal fire and seismic modelling. The model shall be developed to the same standardization criteria of the existing models, to the extent practicable. This includes model construct, event nomenclature, assumptions, preferred technical positions and other key aspects of the existing models to allow NRC staff the ease of use of the model.
The modelling activities shall be done in accordance with the SPAR -AHZ Model Makers Guidance and Volume 2 of the RASP Handbook.
1.3 Perform quality control and quality assurance reviews Monitor model development and perform quality reviews in accordance with the SPAR Model Quality Plan and the MMG.
1.4 Compare results of the SPAR model to results provided by the utility.
Compare the results of the new SPAR model to the results provided by the utility, using methods developed for the previous model comparisons.
1.5 Document the internal events model and the comparison of the results.
Document the model in the same format used for the existing SPAR model, to the extent practicable. Include in this documentation the results of the comparison between the SPAR model and the results provided by the vendor.
Sub Task 2 Provide Support to Other New Reactors SPAR Models 2.1 Review and finalize the AP1000 L2 and LPSD models to incorporate NROs review.
2.2 Perform model maintenance and updates of the SPAR models as requested by the by the COR.
5.0 DELIVERABLES AND/OR MILESTONES SCHEDULE Task # Milestone Final Deliverables Additional Comments (months after (months after project start) project start) 1 1.1 3 months after Document Vogtles internal events, and AHZ site visit and/or SPAR Model and the comparison to the 3 months after PRA information utilitys results (cut-set level).
NROs review Final exchange internal events and Note: AHZ SPAR model will be dependent of 1.2 6 months after AHZ model the level of PRA information obtained from site visit and/or the licensee.
PRA information exchange 2 2.1 3 months after Final AHZ, L2, LPSD SPAR model NROs review 2.2 3 months after NROs request 6.0 TECHNICAL AND OTHER SPECIAL QUALIFICATIONS REQUIRED This activity requires PRA Analysts and Senior PRA Analysts who have a very strong technical background in PRA, intimate experience with SPAR models, and who are knowledgeable from a global standpoint of standardization which is crucial to the needs of the staff who use the models. Additionally, this activity requires a special understanding of how these modelling issues affect PRA quality. Site access will not be required to perform this activity.
The following INL personnel have been identified as key personnel:
7.0 MEETINGS AND TRAVEL Travel associated with this SOW is expected to be minimal, since attendance at most meetings will be via teleconference or video teleconference. A total of three (3) 1 person trips have been budgeted in anticipation of travel required in support of the work as described above. It is anticipated that one INL staff will attend each meeting and that each meeting typically lasts three days.
The laboratory may suggest or propose addition, deletion, or substitution of meetings and/or trips. For planning and budgeting purposes, potential meeting places are NRC Headquarters, Rockville, MD.
All travel requires written Government approval from the CO, unless otherwise delegated to the COR.
Foreign travel for the DOE laboratory personnel requires a 60-day lead time for NRC approval.
For prior approval of foreign travel, the DOE laboratory shall submit an NRC Form 445, Request for Approval of Official Foreign Travel. NRC Form 445 is available in the MD 11.7 Documents library and on the NRC Web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/forms/. Foreign travel is approved by the NRC Executive Director for Operations (EDO).
8.0 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS As stated in the Scope of Work, the deliverables for this project consist of the following:
Document the SPAR model in the same format used for the existing SPAR model, to the extent practicable. Include in this documentation the results of the comparison between the SPAR model and the results provided by the vendor. Documentation shall be provided as an electronic manuscript, in Adobe Portable Document Format. The Contractor shall prepare the text in Microsoft Word, and use any of the file types allowed for preparation of NUREG-SERIES MANUSCRIPTS (see below). Paper documents are not required.
Interim and final reports shall be provided in Adobe Acrobat Portable Document Format (PDF).
Distribution of the interim reports shall be controlled by the PM/TM.
The DOE Laboratory is responsible for structuring the deliverable to follow agency standards.
The current agency standard is Microsoft Office Suite 2010. The current agency Portable Document Format (PDF) standard is Adobe Acrobat 9 Professional. Deliverables must be submitted free of spelling and grammatical errors and conform to requirements stated in this section.
Monthly Letter Status Reports In accordance with Management Directive 11.7, NRC Procedures for Placement and Monitoring of Work with the U.S. Department of Energy, the DOE Laboratory must electronically submit a Monthly Letter Status Report (MLSR) by the 20th day of each month to the Contracting Officer Representative (COR) with copies to the Contracting Officer (CO) and the Office Administration/Division of Contracts to ContractsPOT.Resource@nrc.gov. If a project is a task ordering agreement, a separate MLSR must be submitted for each task order with a summary project MLSR, even if no work has been performed during a reporting period. Once NRC has determined that all work on a task order is completed and that final costs are acceptable, a task order may be omitted from the MLSR.
The MLSR must include the following: agreement number; task order number, if applicable; job code number; title of the project; project period of performance; task order period of performance, if applicable; CORs name, telephone number, and e-mail address; full name and address of the performing organization; principal investigator's name, telephone number, and e-mail address; and reporting period.
9.0 PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE The estimated period of performance for this work is August 10, 2018 - September 30, 2020.
10.0 CONTRACTING OFFICERS REPRESENTATIVE The COR monitors all technical aspects of the agreement/task order and assists in its administration. The COR is authorized to perform the following functions: assure that the DOE Laboratory performs the technical requirements of the agreement/task order; perform inspections necessary in connection with agreement/task order performance; maintain written and oral communications with the DOE Laboratory concerning technical aspects of the agreement/task order; issue written interpretations of technical requirements, including Government drawings, designs, specifications; monitor the DOE Laboratorys performance and notify the DOE Laboratory of any deficiencies; coordinate availability of NRC-furnished material and/or GFP; and provide site entry of DOE Laboratory personnel.
Contracting Officers Representative Michelle. M Gonzalez Mail Stop C4A07M Washington, D. C. 20555-0001 Phone: (301) 415-5661 Fax: (301) 415-6671 Email: (michelle.gonzalez@nrc.gov)
Alternate Contracting Officers Representative Name: Suzanne Dennis Agency: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office: RES Mail Stop: T10A14 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-Mail: (suzanne.dennis@nrc.gov)
Phone: (301) 415-7000 11.0 MATERIALS REQUIRED N/A 12.0 NRC-FURNISHED PROPERTY/MATERIALS Information to be provided by NRC:
NRC will provide to INL the documented PRA and other associated documents provided to the NRC by the NSSS Vendor sufficient to develop the SPAR model.
13.0 RESEARCH QUALITY The quality of NRC research programs are assessed each year by the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards. Within the context of their reviews of RES programs, the definition of quality research is based upon several major characteristics:
Results meet the objectives (75% of overall score)
Justification of major assumptions (12%)
Soundness of technical approach and results (52%)
Uncertainties and sensitivities addressed (11%)
Documentation of research results and methods is adequate (25% of overall score)
Clarity of presentation (16%)
Identification of major assumptions (9%)
It is the responsibility of the DOE Laboratory to ensure that these quality criteria are adequately addressed throughout the course of the research that is performed. The NRC COR will review all research products with these criteria in mind.
14.0 STANDARDS FOR CONTRACTORS WHO PREPARE NUREG-SERIES MANUSCRIPTS The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) began to capture most of its official records electronically on January 1, 2000. The NRC will capture each final NUREG-series publication in its native application. Therefore, please submit your final manuscript that has been approved by your NRC Project Manager in both electronic and camera-ready copy.
The final manuscript shall be of archival quality and comply with the requirements of NRC Management Directive 3.7 NUREG-Series Publications. The document shall be technically edited consistent with NUREG-1379, Rev. 2 (May 2009) "NRC Editorial Style Guide." The goals of the "NRC Editorial Style Guide" are readability and consistency for all agency documents.
All format guidance, as specified in NUREG-0650, Preparing NUREG-Series Publications,"
Rev. 2 (January 1999), will remain the same with one exception. You will no longer be required to include the NUREG-series designator on the bottom of each page of the manuscript. The NRC will assign this designator when we send the camera-ready copy to the printer and will place the designator on the cover, title page, and spine. The designator for each report will no longer be assigned when the decision to prepare a publication is made. The NRC's Publishing Services Branch will inform the NRC Project Manager for the publication of the assigned designator when the final manuscript is sent to the printer.
For the electronic manuscript, the Contractor shall prepare the text in Microsoft Word, and use any of the following file types for charts, spreadsheets, and the like.
File Types to be Used for NUREG-Series Publications File Type File Extension MicrosoftWord .doc Microsoft PowerPoint .ppt MicrosoftExcel .xls MicrosoftAccess .mdb Portable Document Format .pdf This list is subject to change if new software packages come into common use at NRC or by our licensees or other stakeholders that participate in the electronic submission process. If a portion of your manuscript is from another source and you cannot obtain an acceptable electronic file type for this portion (e.g., an appendix from an old publication), the NRC can, if necessary, create a tagged image file format (file extension.tif) for that portion of your report.
Note that you should continue to submit original photographs, which will be scanned, since digitized photographs do not print well.
If you choose to publish a compact disk (CD) of your publication, place on the CD copies of the manuscript in both (1) a portable document format (PDF); (2) a Microsoft Word file format, and (3) an Adobe Acrobat Reader, or, alternatively, print instructions for obtaining a free copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader on the back cover insert of the jewel box.
15.0 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS N/A References N/A Access to Non-NRC Facilities/Equipment N/A Applicable Publications N/A Controls over document handling and non-disclosure of materials N/A