NRC Generic Letter 1981-20: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 04/10/1981 | | issue date = 04/10/1981 | ||
| title = NRC Generic Letter 1981-020: Safety Concerns Associated with Pipe Breaks in the BWR Scram System | | title = NRC Generic Letter 1981-020: Safety Concerns Associated with Pipe Breaks in the BWR Scram System | ||
| author name = Eisenhut D | | author name = Eisenhut D | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR | ||
| addressee name = | | addressee name = | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| page count = 4 | | page count = 4 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:v , UNITED | {{#Wiki_filter:v , UNITED STATES | ||
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | |||
IWASHINGTON, 0. C 20555 | |||
**** APR 1 c n TO ALL BWR LICENSEES | |||
SUBJECT: SAFETY CONCERNS ASSOCIATED WITH PIPE | |||
BWR SCRAM SYSTEM (GENERIC LETTER BREAKS IN THE | |||
81-20) | |||
Yesterday, we discussed with your representatives Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data the NRC's Office of Concerns Associated with Pipe Break report entitled, "Safety in the BWR Scram System." The Report describes a potential sequence of events which could result from a break in the BWR scram discharge piping during a scram condition concurrent with an inability to reclose the Concerns identified include the quality scram outlet valves. | |||
of the scram discharge volume piping, the ability to detect and isolate such a break, and potential water and steam degradation of available ECCS equipment as a result of the break. A number of recommendations remedy the potential concerns. were made in the report to We are presently studying these issues and recommendations to determine whether BWR design basis accidents should be whether appropriate actions should be taken modified and as a consequence for operating BWR plants. | |||
The purpose of this letter is to provide to you the AEOD report so that you can evaluate its applicability to your plant and determine appropriate remedial measures, and to request concerning your evaluation in order to information from you assist in determining an appropriate course of action for the NRC. | |||
Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) please provide us in writing, under oath or affirmation, within 45 days the following information: of your receipt of this letter, | |||
As | 1. A generic evaluation of the applicability of indicated sequences of events in the report the BWR plant design, your estimate of the probability to the of occurrence of such sequences, and the bases-for these conclusions, | ||
2. A generic evaluation of the applicability indicated safety concerns and findings in of the the report relative to BWR plant construction, design, and operation and the bases for these conclusions, and | |||
!112170336781044o | |||
) | |||
t1~-D . PDR | |||
EWR Licensees - 2 - | |||
3. A generic evaluation of the recommendations listed in the report discussing the degree to which the recommendations are being or have been implemented with bases why the recommendations should or should not be completely Implemented on BWRs. | |||
In addition, pursuant to 50.54(f) provide the following information in writing within 120 days of your receipt of this letter: | |||
1. Provide an evaluation of the applicability of the | |||
-. 45 day generic evaluation to your plant. This evaluation should contain plant specific considerations related to system design, instru- mentation, construction, operation, operator training, and emergency procedures for your plant. | |||
2. In light of the AEOD report and the 45 day generic evaluation, provide a plant specific evaluation of your facility's Scram Discharge Volume System conformance to GDC 14, GDC 35, GDC 55, §50.2(v), | |||
50.55a (including footnote 2), and 150.46 of the Commission's regulations. This evaluation should address which portions of the Scram Discharge Volume System are considered to be part of the reactor coolant pressure boundary, the quality group and safety class of the Scram Discharge Volume System, the codes and standards used for the design, fabrication.and inservice inspection of this system, and your bases for the above classifications or groupings. | |||
3. Provide by analysis or reference a demonstration that a break located anywhere in the Scram Discharge Volume System could meet the requirements of 550.46 of the Commission's regulations, taking into account the environmental and flooding aspects of such a break. | |||
T- | |||
* - \.-v | |||
'1i BWR Licensees - 3 - | |||
This request for information was approved by GAO under a blanket clearance nuuber R0072 which expires November 30, 1983. Comments on burden and duplication may be directed to the U.S. General Accounting Office, Regulatory Reports Review, Room 5106, 441 G Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20548. | |||
ncerely, Darrell G. sen u Division ofL icensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosure: | |||
As stated cc: Service List with Enclosure | |||
4 T'I ' .,.'. | |||
. . . | |||
I I | |||
BWR Licensees -3 - | |||
This request for information was approved by GAO under a blanket clearance number R0072 which expires November 30, 1983. Comments on burden and duplication may be directed to the U.S. General Accounting Office, Regulatory Reports Review, Room 5106, 441 G Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20548. | |||
Division ofyLicensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosure: | |||
As stated cc: Service List with Enclosure}} | |||
{{GL-Nav}} | {{GL-Nav}} | ||
Latest revision as of 02:16, 24 November 2019
| ML031210330 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 04/10/1981 |
| From: | Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| References | |
| GL-81-020, NUDOCS 8112170367 | |
| Download: ML031210330 (4) | |
v , UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
IWASHINGTON, 0. C 20555
- APR 1 c n TO ALL BWR LICENSEES
SUBJECT: SAFETY CONCERNS ASSOCIATED WITH PIPE
BWR SCRAM SYSTEM (GENERIC LETTER BREAKS IN THE
81-20)
Yesterday, we discussed with your representatives Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data the NRC's Office of Concerns Associated with Pipe Break report entitled, "Safety in the BWR Scram System." The Report describes a potential sequence of events which could result from a break in the BWR scram discharge piping during a scram condition concurrent with an inability to reclose the Concerns identified include the quality scram outlet valves.
of the scram discharge volume piping, the ability to detect and isolate such a break, and potential water and steam degradation of available ECCS equipment as a result of the break. A number of recommendations remedy the potential concerns. were made in the report to We are presently studying these issues and recommendations to determine whether BWR design basis accidents should be whether appropriate actions should be taken modified and as a consequence for operating BWR plants.
The purpose of this letter is to provide to you the AEOD report so that you can evaluate its applicability to your plant and determine appropriate remedial measures, and to request concerning your evaluation in order to information from you assist in determining an appropriate course of action for the NRC.
Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) please provide us in writing, under oath or affirmation, within 45 days the following information: of your receipt of this letter,
1. A generic evaluation of the applicability of indicated sequences of events in the report the BWR plant design, your estimate of the probability to the of occurrence of such sequences, and the bases-for these conclusions,
2. A generic evaluation of the applicability indicated safety concerns and findings in of the the report relative to BWR plant construction, design, and operation and the bases for these conclusions, and
!112170336781044o
)
t1~-D . PDR
EWR Licensees - 2 -
3. A generic evaluation of the recommendations listed in the report discussing the degree to which the recommendations are being or have been implemented with bases why the recommendations should or should not be completely Implemented on BWRs.
In addition, pursuant to 50.54(f) provide the following information in writing within 120 days of your receipt of this letter:
1. Provide an evaluation of the applicability of the
-. 45 day generic evaluation to your plant. This evaluation should contain plant specific considerations related to system design, instru- mentation, construction, operation, operator training, and emergency procedures for your plant.
2. In light of the AEOD report and the 45 day generic evaluation, provide a plant specific evaluation of your facility's Scram Discharge Volume System conformance to GDC 14, GDC 35, GDC 55, §50.2(v),
50.55a (including footnote 2), and 150.46 of the Commission's regulations. This evaluation should address which portions of the Scram Discharge Volume System are considered to be part of the reactor coolant pressure boundary, the quality group and safety class of the Scram Discharge Volume System, the codes and standards used for the design, fabrication.and inservice inspection of this system, and your bases for the above classifications or groupings.
3. Provide by analysis or reference a demonstration that a break located anywhere in the Scram Discharge Volume System could meet the requirements of 550.46 of the Commission's regulations, taking into account the environmental and flooding aspects of such a break.
T-
- - \.-v
'1i BWR Licensees - 3 -
This request for information was approved by GAO under a blanket clearance nuuber R0072 which expires November 30, 1983. Comments on burden and duplication may be directed to the U.S. General Accounting Office, Regulatory Reports Review, Room 5106, 441 G Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20548.
ncerely, Darrell G. sen u Division ofL icensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosure:
As stated cc: Service List with Enclosure
4 T'I ' .,.'.
. . .
I I
BWR Licensees -3 -
This request for information was approved by GAO under a blanket clearance number R0072 which expires November 30, 1983. Comments on burden and duplication may be directed to the U.S. General Accounting Office, Regulatory Reports Review, Room 5106, 441 G Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20548.
Division ofyLicensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosure:
As stated cc: Service List with Enclosure