ML12177A063: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:June 25, 2012 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION  
{{#Wiki_filter:June 25, 2012 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE COMMISSION In the Matter of                                )
Calvert Cliffs 3 Nuclear Project, L.L.C.        )    Docket No. 52-016-COL (Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 3)    )
In the Matter of                                )
Detroit Edison Co.                              )    Docket No. 52-033-COL (Fermi Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 3)              )
In the Matter of                                )
Duke Energy Carolinas, L.L.C.                    )    Docket Nos. 52-018-COL (William States Lee III Nuclear Station,        )                52-019-COL Units 1 and 2)                                  )
In the Matter of                                )
Entergy Operations, Inc.                        )    Docket No. 50-416-LR (Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Unit 1)            )
In the Matter of                                )
Entergy Operations, Inc.                        )    Docket No. 52-024-COL (Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Unit 3)            )
In the Matter of                                )
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co.                )    Docket No. 50-346-LR (Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station,              )
Unit 1)                                          )
In the Matter of                                )
Florida Power & Light Co.                        )    Docket Nos. 52-040-COL (Turkey Point, Units 6 and 7)                    )                52-041-COL In the Matter of                                )
Luminant Generation Co., L.L.C.                  )    Docket Nos. 52-034-COL (Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant,              )                52-035-COL Units 3 and 4)                                  )
In the Matter of                                )
Nextera Energy Seabrook, L.L.C.                  )    Docket No. 50-443-LR (Seabrook Station, Unit 1)                      )
In the Matter of                                )
Pacific Gas and Electric Co.                    )    Docket Nos. 50-275-LR (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,              )                50-323-LR Units 1 and 2)                                  )


BEFORE THE COMMISSION
In the Matter of                                  )
PPL Bell Bend, L.L.C.                            ) Docket No. 52-039-COL (Bell Bend Nuclear Power Plant)                  )
In the Matter of                                  )
Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.                  ) Docket Nos. 52-022-COL (Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant,              )            52-023-COL Units 2 and 3)                                    )
In the Matter of                                  )
Progress Energy Florida, Inc.                    ) Docket Nos. 52.029-COL (Levy County Nuclear Power Plant,                )            52-030-COL Units 1 and 2)                                    )
In the Matter of                                  )
South Texas Nuclear Operating Co.                ) Docket Nos. 50-498-LR (South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2)              )            50-499-LR In the Matter of                                  )
Nuclear Innovation North America LLC              ) Docket Nos. 52-012-COL (South Texas Project, Units 3 and 4)              )            52-013-COL In the Matter of                                  )
Tennessee Valley Authority                        ) Docket Nos. 52-014-COL (Bellefonte Nuclear Power Plant, Units 3 and 4)  )            52-015-COL In the Matter of                                  )
Tennessee Valley Authority                        ) Docket No. 50-0391-OL (Watts Bar Unit 2)                                )
In the Matter of                                  )
Union Electric Co.                                ) Docket No. 50-483-LR (Callaway Plant Unit 1)                          )
In the Matter of                                  )
Virginia Electric and Power Co.                  ) Docket No. 52-017-COL d/b/a Dominion Virginia Power and                )
Old Dominion Electric Cooperative                )
(North Anna Unit 3)                              )
____________________________________________________________________________


In the Matter of     ) Calvert Cliffs 3 Nuclear Project, L.L.C. ) Docket No. 52-016-COL (Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 3)  )  
NRC STAFFS ANSWER TO PETITION TO SUSPEND FINAL DECISIONS IN ALL PENDING REACTOR LICENSING PROCEEDINGS PENDING COMPLETION OF REMANDED WASTE CONFIDENCE PROCEEDINGS Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 2.323(c) and the June 19, 2012 Commission Order, the Staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Staff) hereby provides its answer to the Petition to Suspend Final Decisions in All Pending Reactor Licensing Proceedings Pending Completion of Remanded Waste Confidence Proceedings (Petition), served June 18 and 19, 2012. Multiple organizations and individuals filed essentially identical petitions in several reactor licensing proceedings.1 The Petition sought the suspension of final decisions in all reactor licensing proceedings as a result of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals recent decision in State of New York v. NRC, No. 11-1045. sl. op. at 3 (D.C. Cir. June 8, 2012). The D.C. Circuits decision vacated the NRCs updated Waste Confidence Decision and its Temporary Storage Rule and remanded those rulemakings to the NRC. Id. at 21 (citing Waste Confidence Decision Update, 75 Fed. Reg. 81,037 (Dec. 23, 2010) (Waste Confidence Decision); Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel after Cessation of Reactor Operation, Final Rule, 75 Fed. Reg. 81,032 (Dec. 23, 2010) (Temporary Storage Rule)).
In addition to seeking the suspension of all reactor licensing decisions, the Petition seeks a declaration from the Commission that any [Environmental Assessments (EA)] or
[Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)] issued by the NRC will be published in [draft] form with a reasonable opportunity for public comment. Petition at 12. Finally, petitioners requested 1
In the petitions filed in the Fermi combined license (COL) proceeding and Davis-Besse license renewal (LR) proceeding, the petitioners indicated in their 10 C.F.R. § 2.323(b) certification that
[c]ounsel for the staff stated that the NRC Staff would oppose the motion. Petition at 16. However, this was not the Staffs position. In responding to petitioners inquiry, the Staff stated that Based on the representation in your email, we do not have enough information to take a position on this petition. We will respond to the petition after it is filed. The Staffs response was accurately represented in petitions filed in the other proceedings.


In the Matter of     )
a generic modification to each proceedings timely filing standards as applied by the NRC regulations or the applicable scheduling orders. The Petition asks that a period of at least 60 days [be allowed] for raising site-specific concerns relating to the remanded proceedings in individual licensing proceedings.2 Id.
Detroit Edison Co.     ) Docket No. 52-033-COL (Fermi Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 3)   )
The Commission has not yet indicated how it intends to respond to the D.C. Circuits ruling. While the Staff agrees that no final decision to grant a combined license (COL),
operating license, or renewed operating license should be made in the captioned proceedings until the NRC has appropriately dispositioned the issues remanded by the court, there are no imminent final initial or renewed reactor licensing decisions.3 Second, to the extent the Commission chooses to disposition the remanded Waste Confidence Decision through the preparation of either an environmental analysis or, if necessary, an environmental impact statement, the Staff will provide a reasonable opportunity for public comment consistent with the NRCs regulations, the National Environmental Policy Act, and the current staff practice.4 See generally 10 C.F.R. Part 51.
Finally, with respect to the petitioners request for a 60-day period to raise site-specific concerns in individual proceedings, the Commissions normal adjudicatory procedures in 2
In linking the 60-day filing period to remanded proceedings, the Petition is unclear as to what remanded proceedings are the triggering events for invoking the 60- day filing period.
3 With respect to license renewal proceedings, Indian Point is perhaps the closest to a final decision by the Board. The Indian Point license renewal still has three contentions that are not currently scheduled for a hearing and are waiting on the Staff to issue a draft supplement environmental impact statement (EIS), final supplemental EIS, and a supplemental safety evaluation report, which is currently anticipated to issue no earlier than December 2012. With respect to COL proceedings, the Levy County COL will most likely be the next application for which a decision to grant or deny a combined license will be reached; a contested hearing before the Board is scheduled for October 2012. The date for the uncontested hearing has not been established by the Commission.
4 While not legally required, the Staff typically provides for public participation on environmental assessments of significant public interest.


In the Matter of    )
10 C.F.R. Part 2 already provide well-understood and appropriate means for raising contentions based on new information and site-specific considerations. See Union Electric Co. d/b/a Ameren Missouri (Callaway Plant, Unit 2), CLI-11-05, 74 NRC __, __ (slip op. at 32-36, 42)
Duke Energy Carolinas, L.L.C.   ) Docket Nos. 52-018-COL (William States Lee III Nuclear Station,   )          52-019-COL Units 1 and 2)      ) 
(Sept. 9, 2011); cf. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2), CLI-12-13, 75 NRC __, __ (slip op. at 7) (Jun. 7, 2012) ([T]he trigger point for the timely submission of new or amended contentions is when new information becomes available, and our process places on the intervenor the obligation to raise new contentions based on such information.). Given the varying procedural postures of the captioned proceedings, as well as the uncertainty as to what site-specific concerns petitioners may decide to raise, it is unnecessary to establish a generic 60-day timetable as petitioners propose.5 Rather, the appropriate timeframe for raising concerns associated with the Waste Confidence Decision (and/or the NRCs response to the court ruling) will necessarily depend on the nature of those concerns and can be appropriately resolved under each proceedings scheduling order or the applicable NRC regulations as appropriate.
5 As the petition acknowledges, in the event petitioners seek participation in individual licensing proceedings, they may need to submit hearing requests or petitions to intervene, standing declarations, or motions to reopen the record, depending on the posture of the particular proceeding. See Petition at 11-
: 12. Some of the captioned proceedings have admitted contentions including Bellefonte COL, Calvert Cliffs COL, Fermi COL, Levy County COL, South Texas Project COL, Turkey Point COL, Davis-Besse license renewal (LR), Seabrook LR, and Diablo Canyon LR, and Watts Bar. For others, although intervention was granted, all admitted contentions were subsequently dismissed or otherwise resolved including Comanche Peak COL and North Anna COL; for still others, a hearing was either not granted or was never requested including Bell Bend COL, Shearon Harris COL, W.S. Lee COL, Grand Gulf COL, South Texas LR, and Grand Gulf LR. In Callaway LR, contentions were filed, but the Board has not yet ruled on the admissibility of the contentions. Accordingly, the Staffs view is that any contentions filed in an individual proceeding would still need to satisfy all the applicable requirements of 10 C.F.R. Part 2, including the reopening standard for those proceedings with a closed record, for example.


In the Matter of      )
Respectfully submitted,
Entergy Operations, Inc.     ) Docket No. 50-416-LR (Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Unit 1)   )  
/Signed (electronically) by/6                            /Signed (electronically) by/
Brian G. Harris                                          Maxwell Smith Counsel for NRC Staff                                    Counsel for NRC Staff Davis-Besse LR                                          Diablo Canyon LR, Seabrook LR, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                      South Texas LR Mail Stop O15-D21                                        U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001                                Mail Stop O15-D21 (301) 415-1392                                          Washington, DC 20555-0001 Brian.Harris@nrc.gov                                    (301) 415-1246 Maxwell.Smith@nrc.gov
/Signed (electronically) by/                            /Signed (electronically) by/
David E. Roth                                            Marcia Carpentier Counsel for the NRC Staff                                Counsel for the NRC Staff Watts Bar                                                Fermi COL, North Anna COL U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                      U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O15-D21                                        Mail Stop O-15 D21 Washington, DC 20555-0001                                Washington, DC 20555-0001 (301) 415-2749                                          (301) 415-4126 David.Roth@nrc.gov                                      Marcia.Carpentier@nrc.gov
/Signed (electronically) by/                            /Signed (electronically) by/
Sarah Price                                              Mary B. Spencer Counsel for the NRC Staff                                Counsel for the NRC Staff Turkey Point COL, Shearon Harris COL                    Callaway LR U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                      U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O15-D21                                        Mail Stop O15-D21 Washington, DC 20555-0001                                Washington, DC 20555-0001 (301) 415-2047                                          (301) 415-1324 Sarah.Price@nrc.gov                                      Mary.spencer@nrc.gov 6
Because the Staff is filling identical documents in each of the applicable proceedings, the signature block utilizes the term Signed (electronically) by to indicate that each counsel signed for the proceedings listed below their signature.


In the Matter of      ) Entergy Operations, Inc.     ) Docket No. 52-024-COL (Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Unit 3)   )  
                                    /Signed (electronically) by/          /Signed (electronically) by/
Jody C. Martin                        Patrick Moulding Counsel for the NRC Staff            Counsel for the NRC Staff Bellefonte COL, Levy County COL      Grand Gulf COL U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission    U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O-15 D21                    Mail Stop O-15 D21 Washington, DC 20555-0001            Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 (301) 415-1569                        (301) 415-2549 Jody.Martin@nrc.gov                  Patrick.Moulding@nrc.gov
/Signed (electronically) by/          /Signed (electronically) by/
Michael A. Spencer                    Susan H. Vrahoretis Counsel for the NRC Staff            Counsel for NRC Staff South Texas COL, William S. Lee COL  Bell Bend COL, Comanche Peak COL U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission    U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O-15 D21                    Mail Stop O-15 D21 Washington, DC 20555-0001            Washington, DC 20555-0001 (301) 415-4073                        (301) 415-4075 Michael.Spencer@nrc.gov              Susan.Vrahoretis@nrc.gov
/Signed (electronically) by/          /Signed (electronically) by/
Anthony Wilson                        Beth N. Mizuno Counsel for the NRC Staff            Counsel for the NRC Staff Calvert Cliffs COL                   Grand Gulf LR U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission    U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O-15 D21                    Mail Stop O15-D21 Washington, DC 20555-0001            Washington, DC 20555-0001 (301) 415-3699                        (301) 415-3122 Anthony.Wilson@nrc.gov                Beth.Mizuno@nrc.gov Dated at Rockville, Maryland This 25th day of June 2012


In the Matter of    )  FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co.  ) Docket No. 50-346-LR (Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station,  )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE COMMISSION In the Matter of                             )
Unit 1)      )
                                            )
 
ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.                     )       Docket No. 50-416-LR
In the Matter of    )
                                            )
Florida Power & Light Co.    ) Docket Nos. 52-040-COL (Turkey Point, Units 6 and 7)    )          52-041-COL
(Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Unit 1)         )
 
                                            )
In the Matter of    )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of the NRC STAFFS ANSWER TO PETITION TO SUSPEND FINAL DECISIONS IN ALL PENDING REACTOR LICENSING PROCEEDINGS PENDING COMPLETION OF REMANDED WASTE CONFIDENCE PROCEEDINGS in the above-captioned proceeding have been served on the following by Electronic Information Exchange and on the parties or counsel marked with an asterisk
Luminant Generation Co., L.L.C.  ) Docket Nos. 52-034-COL (Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant,  )          52-035-COL Units 3 and 4)      )
* by electronic mail this 25th day of June, 2012.
 
Office of the Secretary                           Office of Commission Appellate Attn: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff           Adjudication Mail Stop: O-16G4                                 Mail Stop: O-16G4 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001                         Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: hearingdocket@nrc.gov                     E-mail: OCAAmail.resource@nrc.gov Paul Gunter                                       U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Beyond Nuclear                                    Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 6930 Carroll Avenue, Suite 400                    Mail Stop T-3F23 Takoma Park, MD 20912                            Washington, DC 20555-0001 Email: paul@beyondnuclear.org E. Roy Hawkens, Chief Administrative Judge E-mail: roy.hawkens@nrc.gov Entergy Services, Inc.                           Erich Pica, President*
In the Matter of    )
639 Loyola Avenue                                 Friends of the Earth New Orleans, LA 70113                             1100 15th Street, NW Joseph a. Aluise                                 11th Floor Assistant General Counsel                         Washington, DC 20555 E-mail: jaluise@entergy.com                       E-mail: mkeever@foe.org Jonathan Rund Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Nextera Energy Seabrook, L.L.C.  ) Docket No. 50-443-LR (Seabrook Station, Unit 1)    )
 
In the Matter of    ) Pacific Gas and Electric Co.    ) Docket Nos. 50-275-LR (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,  )            50-323-LR Units 1 and 2)      )    In the Matter of    ) PPL Bell Bend, L.L.C.    ) Docket No. 52-039-COL (Bell Bend Nuclear Power Plant)  )
 
In the Matter of    )
Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.  ) Docket Nos. 52-022-COL (Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant,  )          52-023-COL Units 2 and 3)      )
 
In the Matter of    )
Progress Energy Florida, Inc.    ) Docket Nos. 52.029-COL (Levy County Nuclear Power Plant,  )          52-030-COL Units 1 and 2)      )
 
In the Matter of    )
South Texas Nuclear Operating Co.  ) Docket Nos. 50-498-LR (South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2)  )          50-499-LR
 
In the Matter of    )
Nuclear Innovation North America LLC  ) Docket Nos. 52-012-COL (South Texas Project, Units 3 and 4)  )          52-013-COL
 
In the Matter of    ) Tennessee Valley Authority    ) Docket Nos. 52-014-COL (Bellefonte Nuclear Power Plant, Units 3 and 4) )          52-015-COL
 
In the Matter of    ) Tennessee Valley Authority    ) Docket No. 50-0391-OL (Watts Bar Unit 2)    ) 
 
In the Matter of    )
Union Electric Co.    ) Docket No. 50-483-LR (Callaway Plant Unit 1)    )
In the Matter of    )
Virginia Electric and Power Co.  ) Docket No. 52-017-COL d/b/a Dominion Virginia Power and    )
Old Dominion Electric Cooperative  )  (North Anna Unit 3)    )
____________________________________________________________________________
 
NRC STAFF'S ANSWER TO PETITION TO SUSPEND FINAL DECISIONS  IN ALL PENDING REACTOR LICENSING PROCEEDINGS PENDING  COMPLETION OF REMANDED WASTE CONFIDENCE PROCEEDINGS Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 2.323(c) and the June 19, 2012 Commission Order, the Staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ("Staff") hereby provides its answer to the "Petition to Suspend Final Decisions in All Pending Reactor Licensing Proceedings Pending Completion of Remanded Waste Confidence Proceedings" ("Petition"), served June 18 and 19, 2012. Multiple organizations and individuals filed essentially identical petitions in several reactor licensing
 
proceedings.
1  The Petition sought the suspension of final decisions in all reactor licensing proceedings as a result of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals' recent decision in State of New York v. NRC, No. 11-1045. sl. op. at 3 (D.C. Cir. June 8, 2012). The D.C. Circuit's decision vacated the NRC's updated Waste Confidence Decision and its Temporary Storage Rule and remanded those rulemakings to the NRC.
Id. at 21 (citing Waste Confidence Decision Update, 75 Fed. Reg. 81,037 (Dec. 23, 2010) ("Waste Confidence Decision"); Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel after Cessation of Reactor Operation, Final Rule, 75 Fed. Reg. 81,032 (Dec. 23, 2010) ("Temporary Storage Rule")). In addition to seeking the suspension of all reactor licensing decisions, the Petition seeks a declaration from the Commission that "any [Environmental Assessments ("EA")] or [Environmental Impact Statements ("EIS")] issued by the NRC will be published in [draft] form with a reasonable opportunity for public comment."  Petition at 12. Finally, petitioners requested 1  In the petitions filed in the Fermi combined license ("COL") proceeding and Davis-Besse license renewal ("LR") proceeding, the petitioners indicated in their 10 C.F.R. § 2.323(b) certification that "[c]ounsel for the staff stated that the NRC Staff would oppose the motion."  Petition at 16. However, this was not the Staff's position. In responding to petitioners' inquiry, the Staff stated that "Based on the representation in your email, we do not have enough information to take a position on this petition. We will respond to the petition after it is filed."  The Staff's re sponse was ac curately represented in petitions filed in the other proceedings. a generic modification to each proceeding's time ly filing standards as applied by the NRC regulations or the applicable scheduling orders. The Petition asks that "a period of at least 60 days [be allowed] for raising site-specific concerns relating to the remanded proceedings in
 
individual licensing proceedings."
2  Id. The Commission has not yet indicated how it intends to respond to the D.C. Circuit's ruling. While the Staff agrees that no final decision to grant a combined license ("COL"), operating license, or renewed operating license should be made in the captioned proceedings until the NRC has appropriately dispositioned the issues remanded by the court, there are no imminent final initial or renewed reactor licensing decisions.
3  Second, to the extent the Commission chooses to disposition the remanded Waste Confidence Decision through the preparation of either an environmental analysis or, if necessary, an environmental impact statement, the Staff will provide a reasonable opportunity for public comment consistent with the NRC's regulations, the National Environmental Policy Act, and the current staff practice.
4  See generally 10 C.F.R. Part 51. Finally, with respect to the petitioners' request for a 60-day period to raise site-specific concerns in individual proceedings, the Commission's normal adjudicatory procedures in 2  In linking the 60-day filing period to "remanded proceedings", the Petition is unclear as to what remanded proceedings are the triggering events for invoking the 60- day filing period.
3  With respect to license renewal proceedings, Indian Point is perhaps the closest to a final decision by the Board. The Indian Point license renewal still has three contentions that are not currently scheduled for a hearing and are waiting on the Staff to issue a draft supplement environmental impact statement ("EIS"), final supplemental EIS, and a supplemental safety evaluation report, which is currently anticipated to issue no earlier than December 2012. With respect to COL proceedings, the Levy County COL will most likely be the next application for which a decision to grant or deny a combined license will be reached; a contested hearing before the Board is scheduled for October 2012. The date for the uncontested hearing has not been established by the Commission.
4  While not legally required, the Staff typically provides for public participation on environmental assessments of significant public interest. 10 C.F.R. Part 2 already provide well-understood and appropriate means for raising contentions based on new information and site-specific considerations. See Union Electric Co. d/b/a Ameren Missouri (Callaway Plant, Unit 2), CLI-11-05, 74 NRC __, __ (slip op. at 32-36, 42) (Sept. 9, 2011);
cf. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2), CLI-12-13, 75 NRC __, __ (slip op. at 7) (Jun. 7, 2012) ("[T]he 'trigger point' for the timely submission of new or amended contentions is when new information becomes available, and our process places on the intervenor the obligation to raise new contentions based on such information."). Given the varying procedural postures of the captioned proceedings, as well as the uncertainty as to what site-specific concerns petitioners may decide to raise, it is unnecessary to establish a generic 60-day timetable as petitioners propose.
5  Rather, the appropriate timeframe for raising concerns associated with the Waste Confidence Decision (and/or the NRC's response to the court ruling) will necessarily depend on the nature of those concerns and can be appropriately resolved under each proceeding's scheduling order or the applicable NRC regulations as appropriate. 
 
5  As the petition acknowledges, in the event petitioners seek participation in individual licensing proceedings, they may need to submit hearing requests or petitions to intervene, standing declarations, or motions to reopen the record, depending on the posture of the particular proceeding.
See Petition at 11-12. Some of the captioned proceedings have admitted contentions including Bellefonte COL, Calvert Cliffs COL, Fermi COL, Levy County COL, South Texas Project COL, Turkey Point COL, Davis-Besse  license renewal ("LR"), Seabrook LR, and Diablo Canyon LR, and Watts Bar. For others, although intervention was granted, all admitted contentions were subsequently dismissed or otherwise resolved including Comanche Peak COL and North Anna COL; for still others, a hearing was either not granted or was never requested including Bell Bend COL, Shearon Harris COL, W.S. Lee COL, Grand Gulf COL, South Texas LR, and Grand Gulf LR. In Callaway LR, contentions were filed, but the Board has not yet ruled on the admissibility of the contentions. Accordingly, the Staff's view is that any contentions filed in an individual proceeding would still need to satisfy all the applicable requirements of 10 C.F.R. Part 2, including the reopening standard for those proceedings with a closed record, for example. Respectfully submitted, 
/Signed (electronically) by/
6  Brian G. Harris Counsel for NRC Staff Davis-Besse LR U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O15-D21 Washington, DC 20555-0001 
 
(301) 415-1392
 
Brian.Harris@nrc.gov
 
/Signed (electronically) by/
Maxwell Smith Counsel for NRC Staff Diablo Canyon LR, Seabrook LR, South Texas LR U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O15-D21 Washington, DC 20555-0001 
 
(301) 415-1246 Maxwell.Smith@nrc.gov
/Signed (electronically) by/
David E. Roth Counsel for the NRC Staff Watts Bar U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O15-D21 Washington, DC 20555-0001 
 
(301) 415-2749 David.Roth@nrc.gov
/Signed (electronically) by/
Marcia Carpentier Counsel for the NRC Staff Fermi COL, North Anna COL U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O-15 D21 Washington, DC 20555-0001
 
(301) 415-4126 Marcia.Carpentier@nrc.gov
/Signed (electronically) by/
Sarah Price Counsel for the NRC Staff Turkey Point COL, Shearon Harris COL U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O15-D21 Washington, DC 20555-0001 
 
(301) 415-2047 Sarah.Price@nrc.gov
/Signed (electronically) by/
Mary B. Spencer Counsel for the NRC Staff Callaway LR U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O15-D21 Washington, DC 20555-0001 
 
(301) 415-1324 Mary.spencer@nrc.gov
 
6  Because the Staff is filling identical documents in each of the applicable proceedings, the signature block utilizes the term "Signed (electronically) by" to indicate that each counsel signed for the proceedings listed below their signature.  /Signed (electronically) by/
 
Jody C. Martin Counsel for the NRC Staff Bellefonte COL, Levy County COL U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O-15 D21 Washington, DC 20555-0001 (301) 415-1569 Jody.Martin@nrc.gov
/Signed (electronically) by/
 
Patrick Moulding Counsel for the NRC Staff Grand Gulf COL U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O-15 D21 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 (301) 415-2549 Patrick.Moulding@nrc.gov
  /Signed (electronically) by/
Michael A. Spencer Counsel for the NRC Staff South Texas COL, William S. Lee COL U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O-15 D21 Washington, DC 20555-0001
 
(301) 415-4073 Michael.Spencer@nrc.gov
  /Signed (electronically) by/
Susan H. Vrahoretis Counsel for NRC Staff Bell Bend COL, Comanche Peak COL U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O-15 D21 Washington, DC 20555-0001 (301) 415-4075 Susan.Vrahoretis@nrc.gov
/Signed (electronically) by/
Anthony Wilson Counsel for the NRC Staff Calvert Cliffs COL U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O-15 D21 Washington, DC 20555-0001 (301) 415-3699 Anthony.Wilson@nrc.gov
/Signed (electronically) by/
Beth N. Mizuno Counsel for the NRC Staff Grand Gulf LR U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O15-D21 Washington, DC 20555-0001 
 
(301) 415-3122
 
Beth.Mizuno@nrc.gov Dated at Rockville, Maryland This 25th day of June 2012 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE COMMISSION
 
In the Matter of     )  
      )
ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.   ) Docket No. 50-416-LR ) (Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Unit 1)   )
      )  
 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE  
 
I hereby certify that copies of the "NRC STAFF'S ANSWER TO PETITION TO SUSPEND FINAL DECISIONS IN ALL PENDING REACTOR LICENSING PROCEEDINGS PENDING COMPLETION OF REMANDED WASTE CONFIDENCE PROCEEDINGS" in the above-captioned proceeding have been served on the following by Electronic Information Exchange and on the parties or counsel marked with an asterisk "*" by electronic mail this 25th day of June, 2012.  
 
Office of the Secretary Attn: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff Mail Stop: O-16G4 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001  
 
E-mail: hearingdocket@nrc.gov Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication Mail Stop: O-16G4 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC  20555-0001
 
E-mail: OCAAmail.resource@nrc.gov Paul Gunter Beyond Nuclear 6930 Carroll Avenue, Suite 400
 
Takoma Park, MD  20912
 
Email: paul@beyondnuclear.org U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing Board  
 
Mail Stop T-3F23 Washington, DC 20555-0001  
 
E. Roy Hawkens, Chief Administrative Judge E-mail: roy.hawkens@nrc.gov
 
Entergy Services, Inc. 639 Loyola Avenue New Orleans, LA 70113 Joseph a. Aluise Assistant General Counsel  
 
E-mail: jaluise@entergy.com Erich Pica, President* Friends of the Earth 1100 15th Street, NW 11th Floor Washington, DC  20555
 
E-mail: mkeever@foe.org Jonathan Rund  
 
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP  
 
1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW  


Washington, D.C. 20004 E-mail: jrund@morganlewis.com
Washington, D.C. 20004 E-mail: jrund@morganlewis.com
            /Signed (electronically) by/
                              /Signed (electronically) by/
Beth N. Mizuno       Counsel for the NRC Staff U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O-15 D21       Washington, DC 20555-0001       Telephone: (301) 415-3122 E-mail:
Beth N. Mizuno Counsel for the NRC Staff U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O-15 D21 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Telephone: (301) 415-3122 E-mail: Beth.Mizuno@nrc.gov Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 25th day of June, 2012}}
Beth.Mizuno@nrc.gov
 
Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 25th day of June, 2012}}

Latest revision as of 01:40, 12 November 2019

NRC Staff'S Answer to Petition to Suspend Final Decisions in All Pending Reactor Licensing Proceedings Pending Completion of Remanded Waste Confidence Proceedings
ML12177A063
Person / Time
Site: Grand Gulf Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 06/25/2012
From: Mizuno B
NRC/OGC
To:
NRC/OCM
SECY RAS
References
License Renewal, RAS 22683, 50-416-LR
Download: ML12177A063 (9)
v • d • e


Text

June 25, 2012 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE COMMISSION In the Matter of )

Calvert Cliffs 3 Nuclear Project, L.L.C. ) Docket No. 52-016-COL (Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 3) )

In the Matter of )

Detroit Edison Co. ) Docket No. 52-033-COL (Fermi Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 3) )

In the Matter of )

Duke Energy Carolinas, L.L.C. ) Docket Nos. 52-018-COL (William States Lee III Nuclear Station, ) 52-019-COL Units 1 and 2) )

In the Matter of )

Entergy Operations, Inc. ) Docket No. 50-416-LR (Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Unit 1) )

In the Matter of )

Entergy Operations, Inc. ) Docket No. 52-024-COL (Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Unit 3) )

In the Matter of )

FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co. ) Docket No. 50-346-LR (Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, )

Unit 1) )

In the Matter of )

Florida Power & Light Co. ) Docket Nos. 52-040-COL (Turkey Point, Units 6 and 7) ) 52-041-COL In the Matter of )

Luminant Generation Co., L.L.C. ) Docket Nos. 52-034-COL (Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, ) 52-035-COL Units 3 and 4) )

In the Matter of )

Nextera Energy Seabrook, L.L.C. ) Docket No. 50-443-LR (Seabrook Station, Unit 1) )

In the Matter of )

Pacific Gas and Electric Co. ) Docket Nos. 50-275-LR (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, ) 50-323-LR Units 1 and 2) )

In the Matter of )

PPL Bell Bend, L.L.C. ) Docket No. 52-039-COL (Bell Bend Nuclear Power Plant) )

In the Matter of )

Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. ) Docket Nos. 52-022-COL (Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, ) 52-023-COL Units 2 and 3) )

In the Matter of )

Progress Energy Florida, Inc. ) Docket Nos. 52.029-COL (Levy County Nuclear Power Plant, ) 52-030-COL Units 1 and 2) )

In the Matter of )

South Texas Nuclear Operating Co. ) Docket Nos. 50-498-LR (South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2) ) 50-499-LR In the Matter of )

Nuclear Innovation North America LLC ) Docket Nos. 52-012-COL (South Texas Project, Units 3 and 4) ) 52-013-COL In the Matter of )

Tennessee Valley Authority ) Docket Nos. 52-014-COL (Bellefonte Nuclear Power Plant, Units 3 and 4) ) 52-015-COL In the Matter of )

Tennessee Valley Authority ) Docket No. 50-0391-OL (Watts Bar Unit 2) )

In the Matter of )

Union Electric Co. ) Docket No. 50-483-LR (Callaway Plant Unit 1) )

In the Matter of )

Virginia Electric and Power Co. ) Docket No. 52-017-COL d/b/a Dominion Virginia Power and )

Old Dominion Electric Cooperative )

(North Anna Unit 3) )

____________________________________________________________________________

NRC STAFFS ANSWER TO PETITION TO SUSPEND FINAL DECISIONS IN ALL PENDING REACTOR LICENSING PROCEEDINGS PENDING COMPLETION OF REMANDED WASTE CONFIDENCE PROCEEDINGS Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 2.323(c) and the June 19, 2012 Commission Order, the Staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Staff) hereby provides its answer to the Petition to Suspend Final Decisions in All Pending Reactor Licensing Proceedings Pending Completion of Remanded Waste Confidence Proceedings (Petition), served June 18 and 19, 2012. Multiple organizations and individuals filed essentially identical petitions in several reactor licensing proceedings.1 The Petition sought the suspension of final decisions in all reactor licensing proceedings as a result of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals recent decision in State of New York v. NRC, No. 11-1045. sl. op. at 3 (D.C. Cir. June 8, 2012). The D.C. Circuits decision vacated the NRCs updated Waste Confidence Decision and its Temporary Storage Rule and remanded those rulemakings to the NRC. Id. at 21 (citing Waste Confidence Decision Update, 75 Fed. Reg. 81,037 (Dec. 23, 2010) (Waste Confidence Decision); Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel after Cessation of Reactor Operation, Final Rule, 75 Fed. Reg. 81,032 (Dec. 23, 2010) (Temporary Storage Rule)).

In addition to seeking the suspension of all reactor licensing decisions, the Petition seeks a declaration from the Commission that any [Environmental Assessments (EA)] or

[Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)] issued by the NRC will be published in [draft] form with a reasonable opportunity for public comment. Petition at 12. Finally, petitioners requested 1

In the petitions filed in the Fermi combined license (COL) proceeding and Davis-Besse license renewal (LR) proceeding, the petitioners indicated in their 10 C.F.R. § 2.323(b) certification that

[c]ounsel for the staff stated that the NRC Staff would oppose the motion. Petition at 16. However, this was not the Staffs position. In responding to petitioners inquiry, the Staff stated that Based on the representation in your email, we do not have enough information to take a position on this petition. We will respond to the petition after it is filed. The Staffs response was accurately represented in petitions filed in the other proceedings.

a generic modification to each proceedings timely filing standards as applied by the NRC regulations or the applicable scheduling orders. The Petition asks that a period of at least 60 days [be allowed] for raising site-specific concerns relating to the remanded proceedings in individual licensing proceedings.2 Id.

The Commission has not yet indicated how it intends to respond to the D.C. Circuits ruling. While the Staff agrees that no final decision to grant a combined license (COL),

operating license, or renewed operating license should be made in the captioned proceedings until the NRC has appropriately dispositioned the issues remanded by the court, there are no imminent final initial or renewed reactor licensing decisions.3 Second, to the extent the Commission chooses to disposition the remanded Waste Confidence Decision through the preparation of either an environmental analysis or, if necessary, an environmental impact statement, the Staff will provide a reasonable opportunity for public comment consistent with the NRCs regulations, the National Environmental Policy Act, and the current staff practice.4 See generally 10 C.F.R. Part 51.

Finally, with respect to the petitioners request for a 60-day period to raise site-specific concerns in individual proceedings, the Commissions normal adjudicatory procedures in 2

In linking the 60-day filing period to remanded proceedings, the Petition is unclear as to what remanded proceedings are the triggering events for invoking the 60- day filing period.

3 With respect to license renewal proceedings, Indian Point is perhaps the closest to a final decision by the Board. The Indian Point license renewal still has three contentions that are not currently scheduled for a hearing and are waiting on the Staff to issue a draft supplement environmental impact statement (EIS), final supplemental EIS, and a supplemental safety evaluation report, which is currently anticipated to issue no earlier than December 2012. With respect to COL proceedings, the Levy County COL will most likely be the next application for which a decision to grant or deny a combined license will be reached; a contested hearing before the Board is scheduled for October 2012. The date for the uncontested hearing has not been established by the Commission.

4 While not legally required, the Staff typically provides for public participation on environmental assessments of significant public interest.

10 C.F.R. Part 2 already provide well-understood and appropriate means for raising contentions based on new information and site-specific considerations. See Union Electric Co. d/b/a Ameren Missouri (Callaway Plant, Unit 2), CLI-11-05, 74 NRC __, __ (slip op. at 32-36, 42)

(Sept. 9, 2011); cf. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2), CLI-12-13, 75 NRC __, __ (slip op. at 7) (Jun. 7, 2012) ([T]he trigger point for the timely submission of new or amended contentions is when new information becomes available, and our process places on the intervenor the obligation to raise new contentions based on such information.). Given the varying procedural postures of the captioned proceedings, as well as the uncertainty as to what site-specific concerns petitioners may decide to raise, it is unnecessary to establish a generic 60-day timetable as petitioners propose.5 Rather, the appropriate timeframe for raising concerns associated with the Waste Confidence Decision (and/or the NRCs response to the court ruling) will necessarily depend on the nature of those concerns and can be appropriately resolved under each proceedings scheduling order or the applicable NRC regulations as appropriate.

5 As the petition acknowledges, in the event petitioners seek participation in individual licensing proceedings, they may need to submit hearing requests or petitions to intervene, standing declarations, or motions to reopen the record, depending on the posture of the particular proceeding. See Petition at 11-

12. Some of the captioned proceedings have admitted contentions including Bellefonte COL, Calvert Cliffs COL, Fermi COL, Levy County COL, South Texas Project COL, Turkey Point COL, Davis-Besse license renewal (LR), Seabrook LR, and Diablo Canyon LR, and Watts Bar. For others, although intervention was granted, all admitted contentions were subsequently dismissed or otherwise resolved including Comanche Peak COL and North Anna COL; for still others, a hearing was either not granted or was never requested including Bell Bend COL, Shearon Harris COL, W.S. Lee COL, Grand Gulf COL, South Texas LR, and Grand Gulf LR. In Callaway LR, contentions were filed, but the Board has not yet ruled on the admissibility of the contentions. Accordingly, the Staffs view is that any contentions filed in an individual proceeding would still need to satisfy all the applicable requirements of 10 C.F.R. Part 2, including the reopening standard for those proceedings with a closed record, for example.

Respectfully submitted,

/Signed (electronically) by/6 /Signed (electronically) by/

Brian G. Harris Maxwell Smith Counsel for NRC Staff Counsel for NRC Staff Davis-Besse LR Diablo Canyon LR, Seabrook LR, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission South Texas LR Mail Stop O15-D21 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Mail Stop O15-D21 (301) 415-1392 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Brian.Harris@nrc.gov (301) 415-1246 Maxwell.Smith@nrc.gov

/Signed (electronically) by/ /Signed (electronically) by/

David E. Roth Marcia Carpentier Counsel for the NRC Staff Counsel for the NRC Staff Watts Bar Fermi COL, North Anna COL U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O15-D21 Mail Stop O-15 D21 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Washington, DC 20555-0001 (301) 415-2749 (301) 415-4126 David.Roth@nrc.gov Marcia.Carpentier@nrc.gov

/Signed (electronically) by/ /Signed (electronically) by/

Sarah Price Mary B. Spencer Counsel for the NRC Staff Counsel for the NRC Staff Turkey Point COL, Shearon Harris COL Callaway LR U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O15-D21 Mail Stop O15-D21 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Washington, DC 20555-0001 (301) 415-2047 (301) 415-1324 Sarah.Price@nrc.gov Mary.spencer@nrc.gov 6

Because the Staff is filling identical documents in each of the applicable proceedings, the signature block utilizes the term Signed (electronically) by to indicate that each counsel signed for the proceedings listed below their signature.

/Signed (electronically) by/ /Signed (electronically) by/

Jody C. Martin Patrick Moulding Counsel for the NRC Staff Counsel for the NRC Staff Bellefonte COL, Levy County COL Grand Gulf COL U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O-15 D21 Mail Stop O-15 D21 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 (301) 415-1569 (301) 415-2549 Jody.Martin@nrc.gov Patrick.Moulding@nrc.gov

/Signed (electronically) by/ /Signed (electronically) by/

Michael A. Spencer Susan H. Vrahoretis Counsel for the NRC Staff Counsel for NRC Staff South Texas COL, William S. Lee COL Bell Bend COL, Comanche Peak COL U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O-15 D21 Mail Stop O-15 D21 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Washington, DC 20555-0001 (301) 415-4073 (301) 415-4075 Michael.Spencer@nrc.gov Susan.Vrahoretis@nrc.gov

/Signed (electronically) by/ /Signed (electronically) by/

Anthony Wilson Beth N. Mizuno Counsel for the NRC Staff Counsel for the NRC Staff Calvert Cliffs COL Grand Gulf LR U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O-15 D21 Mail Stop O15-D21 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Washington, DC 20555-0001 (301) 415-3699 (301) 415-3122 Anthony.Wilson@nrc.gov Beth.Mizuno@nrc.gov Dated at Rockville, Maryland This 25th day of June 2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE COMMISSION In the Matter of )

)

ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC. ) Docket No. 50-416-LR

)

(Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Unit 1) )

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of the NRC STAFFS ANSWER TO PETITION TO SUSPEND FINAL DECISIONS IN ALL PENDING REACTOR LICENSING PROCEEDINGS PENDING COMPLETION OF REMANDED WASTE CONFIDENCE PROCEEDINGS in the above-captioned proceeding have been served on the following by Electronic Information Exchange and on the parties or counsel marked with an asterisk

  • by electronic mail this 25th day of June, 2012.

Office of the Secretary Office of Commission Appellate Attn: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff Adjudication Mail Stop: O-16G4 Mail Stop: O-16G4 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: hearingdocket@nrc.gov E-mail: OCAAmail.resource@nrc.gov Paul Gunter U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Beyond Nuclear Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 6930 Carroll Avenue, Suite 400 Mail Stop T-3F23 Takoma Park, MD 20912 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Email: paul@beyondnuclear.org E. Roy Hawkens, Chief Administrative Judge E-mail: roy.hawkens@nrc.gov Entergy Services, Inc. Erich Pica, President*

639 Loyola Avenue Friends of the Earth New Orleans, LA 70113 1100 15th Street, NW Joseph a. Aluise 11th Floor Assistant General Counsel Washington, DC 20555 E-mail: jaluise@entergy.com E-mail: mkeever@foe.org Jonathan Rund Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, D.C. 20004 E-mail: jrund@morganlewis.com

/Signed (electronically) by/

Beth N. Mizuno Counsel for the NRC Staff U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O-15 D21 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Telephone: (301) 415-3122 E-mail: Beth.Mizuno@nrc.gov Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 25th day of June, 2012

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML12177A063&oldid=2098548"