ML17313A486: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From: King, Michael To: sm0973@gmail.com Cc: Banic, Merrilee
{{#Wiki_filter:From:           King, Michael To:             sm0973@gmail.com Cc:             Banic, Merrilee; Lenning, Ekaterina
; Lenning, Ekaterina


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
OEDO-17-00075 Petition Date: Wednesday, November 08, 2017 1:35:28 PM Mr. Miranda, This is to acknowledge receipt of your e-mail dated September 5, 2017. Your email (along
OEDO-17-00075 Petition Date:           Wednesday, November 08, 2017 1:35:28 PM Mr. Miranda, This is to acknowledge receipt of your e-mail dated September 5, 2017. Your email (along with attachment) was distributed to the Chairman, Commissioners, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff and the OIG. NRC staff followed the 2.206 petition process in reviewing your petition including: properly noticing meetings, informing you (Petitioner) of the initial recommendation, giving you (Petitioner) opportunities to address the Petition Review Board (PRB), and informing you (Petitioner) of the final recommendation in the NRC closure letter.
 
The NRC does not re-open the petition unless significant new information is provided. The PRB reviewed your email and attachment and concluded that it does not contain any significant new information, so the petition remains closed.
with attachment) was distributed to the Chairman, Commissioners, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Thank you, Michael King, PRB Chair U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission}}
 
Commission staff and the OIG. NRC staff followed the 2.206 petition process in reviewing
 
your petition including
: properly noticing meetings, informing you (Petitioner) of the initial recommendation, giving you (Petitioner) opportunities to address the Petition Review Board (PRB), and informing you (Petitioner) of the final recommendation in the NRC closure letter.
 
The NRC does not re-open the petition unless significant new information is provided. The
 
PRB reviewed your email and attachment and concluded that it does not contain any
 
significant new information, so the petition remains closed.
 
Thank you, Michael King, PRB Chair
 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission}}

Latest revision as of 07:42, 29 October 2019

E-mail OEDO-17-00075 Petition
ML17313A486
Person / Time
Issue date: 11/08/2017
From: Mark King
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Miranda S
- No Known Affiliation
Lenning E
Shared Package
ML18044A848 List:
References
OEDO-17-00075
Download: ML17313A486 (1)


Text

From: King, Michael To: sm0973@gmail.com Cc: Banic, Merrilee; Lenning, Ekaterina

Subject:

OEDO-17-00075 Petition Date: Wednesday, November 08, 2017 1:35:28 PM Mr. Miranda, This is to acknowledge receipt of your e-mail dated September 5, 2017. Your email (along with attachment) was distributed to the Chairman, Commissioners, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff and the OIG. NRC staff followed the 2.206 petition process in reviewing your petition including: properly noticing meetings, informing you (Petitioner) of the initial recommendation, giving you (Petitioner) opportunities to address the Petition Review Board (PRB), and informing you (Petitioner) of the final recommendation in the NRC closure letter.

The NRC does not re-open the petition unless significant new information is provided. The PRB reviewed your email and attachment and concluded that it does not contain any significant new information, so the petition remains closed.

Thank you, Michael King, PRB Chair U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission