ML18060A168: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 03/01/2018 | | issue date = 03/01/2018 | ||
| title = 070-00925 Cimarron Trip Report November 2017 | | title = 070-00925 Cimarron Trip Report November 2017 | ||
| author name = Poston M | | author name = Poston M | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV/DNMS | | author affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV/DNMS | ||
| addressee name = | | addressee name = | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:March 1, 2018 MEMORANDUM TO: Docket File 070-00925 THROUGH: | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION IV 1600 E. LAMAR BLVD ARLINGTON, TX 76011-4511 March 1, 2018 MEMORANDUM TO: Docket File 070-00925 THROUGH: Ray L. Kellar, P.E., Chief/RA/ | ||
/RA/ | Fuel Cycle and Decommissioning Branch Division of Nuclear Materials Safety FROM: Martha R. Poston, Health Physicist/RA/ | ||
Fuel Cycle and Decommissioning Branch Division of Nuclear Materials Safety | |||
FROM: | |||
/RA/ | |||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
CIMARRON SITE VISIT, CRESENT, OKLAHOMA | CIMARRON SITE VISIT, CRESENT, OKLAHOMA On November 20-21, 2017, staff from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) | ||
On November 20-21, 2017, staff from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) | |||
Region IV office conducted a visit at the Cimarron site to observe the pilot test for Burial Area #1 and to assess the current status of the site, including compliance with license conditions. | Region IV office conducted a visit at the Cimarron site to observe the pilot test for Burial Area #1 and to assess the current status of the site, including compliance with license conditions. | ||
Enclosed to this memorandum is the | Enclosed to this memorandum is the NRCs trip report for this site visit. | ||
In summary, site representatives continued to maintain the site in accordance with license requirements. No significant regulatory issues or safety concerns were identified during the site | In summary, site representatives continued to maintain the site in accordance with license requirements. No significant regulatory issues or safety concerns were identified during the site visit. | ||
Docket: 070-00925 License: SNM-928 | |||
visit. | |||
Docket: 070-00925 License: SNM-928 | |||
==Enclosure:== | ==Enclosure:== | ||
NRC Trip Report | NRC Trip Report CONTACT: Rob Evans 817-200-1234 | ||
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION IV Docket: 070-00925 License: SNM-925 Licensee: Cimarron Environmental Response Trust Facility: Cimarron/Kerr-McGee Uranium Plant Logan County Crescent, Oklahoma Dates: November 20-21, 2017 Inspector: Martha R. Poston, Health Physicist Fuel Cycle and Decommissioning Branch Division of Nuclear Materials Safety Approved by: Ray L. Kellar, P.E. Chief Fuel Cycle and Decommissioning Branch Division of Nuclear Materials Safety | |||
Dates: | |||
==Attachment:== | ==Attachment:== | ||
Photographs taken at Cimarron site | Photographs taken at Cimarron site Enclosure | ||
NRC Trip Report | |||
Oklahoma City. | ===1 Background=== | ||
The Cimarron site was used to fabricate enriched uranium and mixed oxide fuels for nuclear reactors from 1965-1975. On site, there were several buildings, collection ponds, sanitary lagoons, storage area and burial areas. Originally, the site was owned and operated by Kerr-McGee Corporation. The site was later operated by Cimarron Corporation, a fully owned subsidiary of Kerr McGee. In 2005, ownership of Cimarron Corporation was fully transferred to Tronox Incorporated, who subsequently filed for bankruptcy in 2009. In 2011, Cimarron Environmental Response Trust assumed responsibility for the Cimarron site, including completion of decommissioning activities. | |||
The Cimarron site is approximately 340 hectares (840 acres) along the southern bank of the Cimarron River about 1 kilometer (0.5 miles) north of the intersection of Oklahoma State Highways 33 and 74, and approximately 40 kilometers (25 miles) north of Oklahoma City. | |||
Decommissioning efforts were initiated in 1976. Characterization activities and decommissioning were first conducted at the mixed oxide fuel fabrication (MOFF) building and associated areas, which included evaporation ponds, emergency ponds, sanitary lagoons, underground tanks, a septic tank, and a fenced area around the MOFF building. In 1990, Cimarron Corporation submitted a final survey report of the MOFF building and associated areas to the NRC and requested termination of the MOFF license. The NRC completed a confirmatory survey and terminated the MOFF license consistent with the regulations in place in 1993. However, the lands and the MOFF building were not released for unrestricted use because they were located within the bounds of the uranium fuel fabrication license. | Decommissioning efforts were initiated in 1976. Characterization activities and decommissioning were first conducted at the mixed oxide fuel fabrication (MOFF) building and associated areas, which included evaporation ponds, emergency ponds, sanitary lagoons, underground tanks, a septic tank, and a fenced area around the MOFF building. In 1990, Cimarron Corporation submitted a final survey report of the MOFF building and associated areas to the NRC and requested termination of the MOFF license. The NRC completed a confirmatory survey and terminated the MOFF license consistent with the regulations in place in 1993. However, the lands and the MOFF building were not released for unrestricted use because they were located within the bounds of the uranium fuel fabrication license. | ||
Characterization activities and decommissioning plans were develop and approved by the NRC for facilities associated with the uranium fuel fabrication license. The site was divided into three areas that included affected areas and unaffected areas. Less than 20 percent of the site was impacted by nuclear operations. These areas were further divided into subareas. Cimarron Corporation submitted a final status survey report for each subarea when decommissioning activities were complete for that area. Following NRC review and acceptance, subareas were released for unrestricted use and removed from the uranium fuel fabrication license. By early | Characterization activities and decommissioning plans were develop and approved by the NRC for facilities associated with the uranium fuel fabrication license. The site was divided into three areas that included affected areas and unaffected areas. Less than 20 percent of the site was impacted by nuclear operations. These areas were further divided into subareas. Cimarron Corporation submitted a final status survey report for each subarea when decommissioning activities were complete for that area. Following NRC review and acceptance, subareas were released for unrestricted use and removed from the uranium fuel fabrication license. By early 2000s, the majority of the site had been released for unrestricted use. | ||
Uranium concentrations in the groundwater were in excess of release criteria for some subareas - Burial Area #1, Western Alluvial Area, and Western Upland Area. Plans were developed to lower the uranium concentrations through groundwater remediation. | |||
Progress in this area was delayed when Tronox filed for bankruptcy in 2009. Cimarron Environmental Response Trust took responsibility for the site in 2011. A preliminary remediation plan was submitted to the NRC in 2015. Since 2015, the licensee has proposed additional changes to this remediation plan. | |||
2 | |||
2 Site Status On November 20-21, 2017, NRC staff met with Burns & McDonnell staff managing the Cimarron Environmental Response Trust at the Cimarron site in Logan County, Oklahoma. The visit was intended to serve several purposes: | |||
* Observe recent activities on site as the trust prepares for remediation | * Observe recent activities on site as the trust prepares for remediation | ||
* Observe the pilot test for Burial Area #1 (BA1) | * Observe the pilot test for Burial Area #1 (BA1) | ||
Line 59: | Line 51: | ||
* Lifeng Guo, Hydrogeologist, NRC Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards | * Lifeng Guo, Hydrogeologist, NRC Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards | ||
* Marti Poston, Health Physicist, NRC Region IV | * Marti Poston, Health Physicist, NRC Region IV | ||
* Jeff Lux, Project Manager, Burns & McDonnell On November 20, 2017, the NRC team arrived onsite and was informed by the licensee that the pilot test had been rescheduled and would not occur. The NRC toured the site with the | * Jeff Lux, Project Manager, Burns & McDonnell On November 20, 2017, the NRC team arrived onsite and was informed by the licensee that the pilot test had been rescheduled and would not occur. The NRC toured the site with the licensees representative to verify the current status of construction. The site tour included the Uranium Pond 1 (UP1) pilot test site, the Uranium Pond 2 (UP2) pilot test site, and the BA1 pilot testing area. The BA1 pilot testing area construction was complete, and the licensee had conducted some testing associated with this area. | ||
The BA1 pilot testing area consists of four trenches - two injection and two extraction trenches. The previous trenches were backfilled and the equipment was staged. The licensee determined that the decontamination area as originally planned was not needed. This was based on the collection and analysis of over 200 soil samples. No sample results exceeded 30 pCi/gm (or 5 percent above background). The licensee intends to inject potable water mixed with dye into the injection wells to determine if the previous trenches created a preferential flow path. | The BA1 pilot testing area consists of four trenches - two injection and two extraction trenches. The previous trenches were backfilled and the equipment was staged. The licensee determined that the decontamination area as originally planned was not needed. This was based on the collection and analysis of over 200 soil samples. No sample results exceeded 30 pCi/gm (or 5 percent above background). The licensee intends to inject potable water mixed with dye into the injection wells to determine if the previous trenches created a preferential flow path. | ||
The tour also included a check of the status of construction at the UP1 and UP2 pilot test locations. The wells have been installed at the UP1 area, and the licensee was in the process of digging the trenches. The trenches were taking longer than anticipated due to the amount of sandstone present at the location. Wells were being drilled in the UP2 area. | The tour also included a check of the status of construction at the UP1 and UP2 pilot test locations. The wells have been installed at the UP1 area, and the licensee was in the process of digging the trenches. The trenches were taking longer than anticipated due to the amount of sandstone present at the location. Wells were being drilled in the UP2 area. | ||
On November 21, 2017, the NRC hydrogeologist returned to NRC Headquarters and the Region IV Health Physicist returned to Cimarron to conduct a review of the radiation protection program at the site. The inspector reviewed the radiation source storage (calibration and reference sources), the instrument calibration process and associated records, the air sampling program including the calculational model used to estimate dose to staff, and the sampling and analysis procedures. No items of concern were identified. | On November 21, 2017, the NRC hydrogeologist returned to NRC Headquarters and the Region IV Health Physicist returned to Cimarron to conduct a review of the radiation protection program at the site. The inspector reviewed the radiation source storage (calibration and reference sources), the instrument calibration process and associated records, the air sampling program including the calculational model used to estimate dose to staff, and the sampling and analysis procedures. No items of concern were identified. | ||
3 Conclusions The licensee appeared to be maintaining the site in accordance with license | 3 Conclusions The licensee appeared to be maintaining the site in accordance with license requirements. The NRC staff did not identify any significant safety issues during the site tour. | ||
3 | |||
Figure 1: UP1 construction area - broad view (with the contaminated soil pile behind the trench area) | |||
Figure 2: UP1 clean soils pile Attachment | |||
Figure 3: UP1 trench length standing at midpoint (trench intersection - marked by the white post in the middle of the trench) 2 | |||
Figure 4: UP1 trench standing back from midpoint to show intersection 3 | |||
Figure 5: UP1 trench side view 4 | |||
Figure 6: Drilling wells for UP2 area trenches Figure 7: UP2 area additional well (midpoint well in foreground) 5 | |||
Figure 8: UP2 area midpoint well (drill rig in background) 6 | |||
Figure 9: BA1 area at entry Figure 10: BA1 area decontamination and staging area (midpoint well looking southwest) 7 | |||
Figure 11: BA1 area midpoint well looking northwest 8 | |||
Figure 12: BA1 area midpoint well looking southeast 9 | |||
ML18060A168 | ML18060A168 SUNSI Review ADAMS: Sensitive Non-Publicly Available Keyword By: MRP Yes No Non-Sensitive Publicly Available NRC-002 OFFICE DNMS:FCDB C:FCDB NAME MRPoston-Brown RLKellar SIGNATURE /RA/ /RA/ | ||
DATE 3/1/18 3/1/18}} |
Latest revision as of 17:36, 21 October 2019
ML18060A168 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | 07000925 |
Issue date: | 03/01/2018 |
From: | Poston M Division of Nuclear Materials Safety IV |
To: | |
M. Poston-Brown | |
References | |
Download: ML18060A168 (14) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION IV 1600 E. LAMAR BLVD ARLINGTON, TX 76011-4511 March 1, 2018 MEMORANDUM TO: Docket File 070-00925 THROUGH: Ray L. Kellar, P.E., Chief/RA/
Fuel Cycle and Decommissioning Branch Division of Nuclear Materials Safety FROM: Martha R. Poston, Health Physicist/RA/
Fuel Cycle and Decommissioning Branch Division of Nuclear Materials Safety
SUBJECT:
CIMARRON SITE VISIT, CRESENT, OKLAHOMA On November 20-21, 2017, staff from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
Region IV office conducted a visit at the Cimarron site to observe the pilot test for Burial Area #1 and to assess the current status of the site, including compliance with license conditions.
Enclosed to this memorandum is the NRCs trip report for this site visit.
In summary, site representatives continued to maintain the site in accordance with license requirements. No significant regulatory issues or safety concerns were identified during the site visit.
Docket: 070-00925 License: SNM-928
Enclosure:
NRC Trip Report CONTACT: Rob Evans 817-200-1234
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION IV Docket: 070-00925 License: SNM-925 Licensee: Cimarron Environmental Response Trust Facility: Cimarron/Kerr-McGee Uranium Plant Logan County Crescent, Oklahoma Dates: November 20-21, 2017 Inspector: Martha R. Poston, Health Physicist Fuel Cycle and Decommissioning Branch Division of Nuclear Materials Safety Approved by: Ray L. Kellar, P.E. Chief Fuel Cycle and Decommissioning Branch Division of Nuclear Materials Safety
Attachment:
Photographs taken at Cimarron site Enclosure
NRC Trip Report
1 Background
The Cimarron site was used to fabricate enriched uranium and mixed oxide fuels for nuclear reactors from 1965-1975. On site, there were several buildings, collection ponds, sanitary lagoons, storage area and burial areas. Originally, the site was owned and operated by Kerr-McGee Corporation. The site was later operated by Cimarron Corporation, a fully owned subsidiary of Kerr McGee. In 2005, ownership of Cimarron Corporation was fully transferred to Tronox Incorporated, who subsequently filed for bankruptcy in 2009. In 2011, Cimarron Environmental Response Trust assumed responsibility for the Cimarron site, including completion of decommissioning activities.
The Cimarron site is approximately 340 hectares (840 acres) along the southern bank of the Cimarron River about 1 kilometer (0.5 miles) north of the intersection of Oklahoma State Highways 33 and 74, and approximately 40 kilometers (25 miles) north of Oklahoma City.
Decommissioning efforts were initiated in 1976. Characterization activities and decommissioning were first conducted at the mixed oxide fuel fabrication (MOFF) building and associated areas, which included evaporation ponds, emergency ponds, sanitary lagoons, underground tanks, a septic tank, and a fenced area around the MOFF building. In 1990, Cimarron Corporation submitted a final survey report of the MOFF building and associated areas to the NRC and requested termination of the MOFF license. The NRC completed a confirmatory survey and terminated the MOFF license consistent with the regulations in place in 1993. However, the lands and the MOFF building were not released for unrestricted use because they were located within the bounds of the uranium fuel fabrication license.
Characterization activities and decommissioning plans were develop and approved by the NRC for facilities associated with the uranium fuel fabrication license. The site was divided into three areas that included affected areas and unaffected areas. Less than 20 percent of the site was impacted by nuclear operations. These areas were further divided into subareas. Cimarron Corporation submitted a final status survey report for each subarea when decommissioning activities were complete for that area. Following NRC review and acceptance, subareas were released for unrestricted use and removed from the uranium fuel fabrication license. By early 2000s, the majority of the site had been released for unrestricted use.
Uranium concentrations in the groundwater were in excess of release criteria for some subareas - Burial Area #1, Western Alluvial Area, and Western Upland Area. Plans were developed to lower the uranium concentrations through groundwater remediation.
Progress in this area was delayed when Tronox filed for bankruptcy in 2009. Cimarron Environmental Response Trust took responsibility for the site in 2011. A preliminary remediation plan was submitted to the NRC in 2015. Since 2015, the licensee has proposed additional changes to this remediation plan.
2
2 Site Status On November 20-21, 2017, NRC staff met with Burns & McDonnell staff managing the Cimarron Environmental Response Trust at the Cimarron site in Logan County, Oklahoma. The visit was intended to serve several purposes:
- Observe recent activities on site as the trust prepares for remediation
- Observe the pilot test for Burial Area #1 (BA1)
Attendees at the meeting and site visit included:
- Lifeng Guo, Hydrogeologist, NRC Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
- Marti Poston, Health Physicist, NRC Region IV
- Jeff Lux, Project Manager, Burns & McDonnell On November 20, 2017, the NRC team arrived onsite and was informed by the licensee that the pilot test had been rescheduled and would not occur. The NRC toured the site with the licensees representative to verify the current status of construction. The site tour included the Uranium Pond 1 (UP1) pilot test site, the Uranium Pond 2 (UP2) pilot test site, and the BA1 pilot testing area. The BA1 pilot testing area construction was complete, and the licensee had conducted some testing associated with this area.
The BA1 pilot testing area consists of four trenches - two injection and two extraction trenches. The previous trenches were backfilled and the equipment was staged. The licensee determined that the decontamination area as originally planned was not needed. This was based on the collection and analysis of over 200 soil samples. No sample results exceeded 30 pCi/gm (or 5 percent above background). The licensee intends to inject potable water mixed with dye into the injection wells to determine if the previous trenches created a preferential flow path.
The tour also included a check of the status of construction at the UP1 and UP2 pilot test locations. The wells have been installed at the UP1 area, and the licensee was in the process of digging the trenches. The trenches were taking longer than anticipated due to the amount of sandstone present at the location. Wells were being drilled in the UP2 area.
On November 21, 2017, the NRC hydrogeologist returned to NRC Headquarters and the Region IV Health Physicist returned to Cimarron to conduct a review of the radiation protection program at the site. The inspector reviewed the radiation source storage (calibration and reference sources), the instrument calibration process and associated records, the air sampling program including the calculational model used to estimate dose to staff, and the sampling and analysis procedures. No items of concern were identified.
3 Conclusions The licensee appeared to be maintaining the site in accordance with license requirements. The NRC staff did not identify any significant safety issues during the site tour.
3
Figure 1: UP1 construction area - broad view (with the contaminated soil pile behind the trench area)
Figure 2: UP1 clean soils pile Attachment
Figure 3: UP1 trench length standing at midpoint (trench intersection - marked by the white post in the middle of the trench) 2
Figure 4: UP1 trench standing back from midpoint to show intersection 3
Figure 5: UP1 trench side view 4
Figure 6: Drilling wells for UP2 area trenches Figure 7: UP2 area additional well (midpoint well in foreground) 5
Figure 8: UP2 area midpoint well (drill rig in background) 6
Figure 9: BA1 area at entry Figure 10: BA1 area decontamination and staging area (midpoint well looking southwest) 7
Figure 11: BA1 area midpoint well looking northwest 8
Figure 12: BA1 area midpoint well looking southeast 9
ML18060A168 SUNSI Review ADAMS: Sensitive Non-Publicly Available Keyword By: MRP Yes No Non-Sensitive Publicly Available NRC-002 OFFICE DNMS:FCDB C:FCDB NAME MRPoston-Brown RLKellar SIGNATURE /RA/ /RA/
DATE 3/1/18 3/1/18