ML18079B164

Uncompleted ITAAC Notification Checklist (UINC) 1171 for ITAAC 2.3.02.05.i (Index No. 291) for Vogtle Unit 4

ML18079B164
Person / Time
Site:	Vogtle
Issue date:	03/19/2018
From:	Human Performance, Operator Licensing & ITAAC Branch
To:	Southern Nuclear Operating Co
Kleeh E
References
ITAAC 2.3.02.05.i
Download: ML18079B164 (2)

Text

An ITAAC engineer from the Office of New Reactors, Division of Construction Inspection, and Operational Programs (DCIP) in concert with other reviewer(s) assigned to a UIN review will complete this form for the ITAAC under review.

Docket No: 5200026 Plant Name: Vogtle Unit 4 Combined License Licensee Name: Southern Nuclear Operating Combined NPF-92 Company, Inc License No:

ITAAC ID No: 2.3.02.05.i ITAAC Type: Non-Targeted ITAAC Family Designation or 07A enter N/A:

Uncompleted ITAAC Notification (UIN) ADAMS ML No: ML18057A434 Name of ITAAC Engineer: Kleeh, Edmund Enter Yes in the blank at the beginning of a statement below if the whole statement is true, No if the whole or part of the statement is not true, and N/A if the statement is not applicable.

a. Yes The UIN identifies all of the following: (1) licensee, (2) plant site name, (3) unit number, and (4) plants docket number.

b. Yes The ITAAC as stated in the UIN matches the ITAAC as stated in the combined license.

c. Yes NRC personnel with the requisite technical and engineering knowledge has/have determined that the ITAAC Completion Description (ICD) of the UIN contains sufficient information, including summarizing the methodology for performing the ITAAC, to demonstrate that the licensee will successfully perform the inspection, test, and/or analysis stated in the ITAAC if the licensee uses the methodology described in the UIN.

The methodology described in the ICD of the UIN either was reviewed and approved by the NRC, or is acceptable based on sound scientific, mathematical, and/or engineering principles, and is repeatable, if necessary, without any significant change to the reported result.

d. Yes NRC personnel with the requisite technical and engineering knowledge has/have determined that the ICD of the UIN contains sufficient information to demonstrate that the licensee will be able to show that it has fully met the entire acceptance criterion stated in the ITAAC if it performs the ITAAC as stated in the UIN.

e. N/A For ITAAC specified as being performed on as-built structures, systems, or components (SSCs): If the UIN indicates that the

inspections, tests, and/or analyses of the ITAAC are being performed at location(s) other than the final installed location, then the UIN, based on the guidance in NEI 08-01 either summarizes a technical justification or provides a reference to a generic technical justification in the ICD of the UIN that establishes why it is acceptable to perform the ITAAC at location(s) other than the final installed location. [Enter N/A if the ITAAC is not being performed at a remote location or if the ITAAC is not specified as as-built.]

f. No An additional reviewer was assigned to the UIN review with his or her name entered into the blank at the top of this page based on his or her expertise being required If statements a through d are all Yes and statement e is either Yes or N/A, the UIN has sufficient information; otherwise, the UIN is rejected, and the NRC must communicate with the licensee regarding the need for a new UIN of record. For statements c and d, the person(s) making those determinations should refer to Section 3.2 in Revision 1 of the Office Instruction for the ITAAC Closure Verification Process (NRO-REG-103) for additional information to assist them. The reviewers may provide integrated comments in the space provided below that support the bases for verifying that the UIN contained sufficient information, including, but not limited to, identifying pertinent UIN statements and comments on performance of ITAAC at other than the final installed location. If the NRC rejected the UIN, the reviewers must provide comments in the field below explaining the basis for that determination.

If the NRC reviewers determine that a UIN has sufficient information, this is based on the UINs description of the proposed methodology for completing the ITAAC. The UIN review is not based on consideration of actual performance of the ITAAC, the acceptance criteria results, the completion of NRC inspections, or the resolution of NRC inspection findings, if any. These matters will be addressed during the NRCs review of the later ITAAC closure notification (ICN) for that ITAAC. The NRC staff plans to rely on a UIN review in its review of the later ICN to the extent that the ITAAC completion methods described in the UIN and ICN are the same, subject to new information that might arise between the UIN and ICN reviews.

ITAAC Engineer: Kleeh, Edmund Date: 3/7/2018 DCIP Branch Chief or Designee: Welch, Christopher Date: 3/8/2018 DNRL PM: Hoellman, Jordan