ML18094A000: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 04/04/2018
| issue date = 04/04/2018
| title = Proposed Approach for Staff Review of Plant Specific Modelling of Generation-III Shutdown Seals in License Amendment Requests (Lars)
| title = Proposed Approach for Staff Review of Plant Specific Modelling of Generation-III Shutdown Seals in License Amendment Requests (Lars)
| author name = Benney B J
| author name = Benney B
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DLP/PLPB
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DLP/PLPB
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 9: Line 9:
| docket =  
| docket =  
| license number =  
| license number =  
| contact person = Benney B J
| contact person = Benney B
| package number = ML18072A211
| package number = ML18072A211
| document type = Slides and Viewgraphs
| document type = Slides and Viewgraphs
Line 20: Line 20:
{{#Wiki_filter:Proposed Approach for Staff Review of Plant Specific Modelling of Generation-III Shutdown Seals in License Amendment Requests (LARS)
{{#Wiki_filter:Proposed Approach for Staff Review of Plant Specific Modelling of Generation-III Shutdown Seals in License Amendment Requests (LARS)
Generation III Shutdown Seals (GIII-SDS) Modeled in PRA(s)
Generation III Shutdown Seals (GIII-SDS) Modeled in PRA(s)
Used to Support LAR Was the GIII-SDS model in the PRA peer-reviewed? Case 1(Consistent with review of pee r-reviewed PRA)
Used to Support LAR Case 1 (Consistent with review of peer-reviewed PRA)
Verify and review that the licensee:
Verify and review that the licensee:
1.Provided finding level F&Os and their resolution AND 2.Described how the staff SE on GIII-SDS is met, all the limitations and conditions (L&Cs) therein are satisfied, and justified any deviations. Did GIII-SDS modeling use a peer-reviewed WOG-2000 model as foundation? Case 3Verify and review that the licensee:
: 1. Provided finding level F&Os and Was the GIII-SDS model in            Y                  their resolution AND the PRA peer-reviewed?                            2. Described how the staff SE on GIII-SDS is met, all the limitations and conditions (L&Cs) therein are satisfied, and justified any deviations.
1.Demonstrated (on a plant-specific OR generic basis) why inclusion of GIII-SDS is not a PRA upgrade.
N Licensee chooses to not                Y credit the GIII-SDS in the LAR?                                  Case 2 Verify and review that the licensee:
2.Described how the staff SE on GIII-SDS is met, all the L&Cs therein are satisfied, and justified any deviations. Case 4 Perform a detailed review of GIII-SDS modeling, alignment with staff SE, and L&Cs details via audit and RAIs OR Licensee either convenes peer-review or removes credit (follow approach for Case 1 or 2, as appropriate). Licensee chooses to not credit the GIII-SDS in the LAR? Case 2Verify and review that the licensee:
: 1. Demonstrated on the docket (via sensitivity) that the removal of credit for GIII-SDS does not affect the N                                        decision and insights.
1.Demonstrated on the docket (via sensitivity) that the removal of credit for GIII-SDS does not affect the decision and insights. 2.Clarifies when, and if, the credit will be used.
: 2. Clarifies when, and if, the credit will be used.
N Y N Y N Y}}
Did GIII-SDS modeling use a         Y    Case 3 peer-reviewed WOG-2000                   Verify and review that the licensee:
model as foundation?                      1. Demonstrated (on a plant-specific OR generic basis) why inclusion of GIII-SDS is N                                not a PRA upgrade.
: 2. Described how the staff SE on GIII-SDS is met, all Case 4                              the L&Cs therein are Perform a detailed review of GIII-SDS                 satisfied, and justified any modeling, alignment with staff SE, and               deviations.
L&Cs details via audit and RAIs OR Licensee either convenes peer-review or removes credit (follow approach for Case 1 or 2, as appropriate).}}

Latest revision as of 12:20, 21 October 2019

Proposed Approach for Staff Review of Plant Specific Modelling of Generation-III Shutdown Seals in License Amendment Requests (Lars)
ML18094A000
Person / Time
Issue date: 04/04/2018
From: Brian Benney
NRC/NRR/DLP/PLPB
To:
Benney B
Shared Package
ML18072A211 List:
References
Download: ML18094A000 (1)
v • d • e


Text

Proposed Approach for Staff Review of Plant Specific Modelling of Generation-III Shutdown Seals in License Amendment Requests (LARS)

Generation III Shutdown Seals (GIII-SDS) Modeled in PRA(s)

Used to Support LAR Case 1 (Consistent with review of peer-reviewed PRA)

Verify and review that the licensee:

1. Provided finding level F&Os and Was the GIII-SDS model in Y their resolution AND the PRA peer-reviewed? 2. Described how the staff SE on GIII-SDS is met, all the limitations and conditions (L&Cs) therein are satisfied, and justified any deviations.

N Licensee chooses to not Y credit the GIII-SDS in the LAR? Case 2 Verify and review that the licensee:

1. Demonstrated on the docket (via sensitivity) that the removal of credit for GIII-SDS does not affect the N decision and insights.
2. Clarifies when, and if, the credit will be used.

Did GIII-SDS modeling use a Y Case 3 peer-reviewed WOG-2000 Verify and review that the licensee:

model as foundation? 1. Demonstrated (on a plant-specific OR generic basis) why inclusion of GIII-SDS is N not a PRA upgrade.

2. Described how the staff SE on GIII-SDS is met, all Case 4 the L&Cs therein are Perform a detailed review of GIII-SDS satisfied, and justified any modeling, alignment with staff SE, and deviations.

L&Cs details via audit and RAIs OR Licensee either convenes peer-review or removes credit (follow approach for Case 1 or 2, as appropriate).

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18094A000&oldid=1940824"