ML18094A000: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 04/04/2018 | | issue date = 04/04/2018 | ||
| title = Proposed Approach for Staff Review of Plant Specific Modelling of Generation-III Shutdown Seals in License Amendment Requests (Lars) | | title = Proposed Approach for Staff Review of Plant Specific Modelling of Generation-III Shutdown Seals in License Amendment Requests (Lars) | ||
| author name = Benney B | | author name = Benney B | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DLP/PLPB | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DLP/PLPB | ||
| addressee name = | | addressee name = | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| docket = | | docket = | ||
| license number = | | license number = | ||
| contact person = Benney B | | contact person = Benney B | ||
| package number = ML18072A211 | | package number = ML18072A211 | ||
| document type = Slides and Viewgraphs | | document type = Slides and Viewgraphs | ||
| page count = 1 | | page count = 1 | ||
| project = | |||
| stage = Approval | |||
}} | }} | ||
Line 18: | Line 20: | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:Proposed Approach for Staff Review of Plant Specific Modelling of Generation-III Shutdown Seals in License Amendment Requests (LARS) | {{#Wiki_filter:Proposed Approach for Staff Review of Plant Specific Modelling of Generation-III Shutdown Seals in License Amendment Requests (LARS) | ||
Generation III Shutdown Seals (GIII-SDS) Modeled in PRA(s) | Generation III Shutdown Seals (GIII-SDS) Modeled in PRA(s) | ||
Used to Support LAR | Used to Support LAR Case 1 (Consistent with review of peer-reviewed PRA) | ||
Verify and review that the licensee: | Verify and review that the licensee: | ||
1.Provided finding level F&Os and their resolution AND 2.Described how the staff SE on GIII-SDS is met, all the limitations and conditions (L&Cs) therein are satisfied, and justified any deviations. Did GIII-SDS modeling use a peer-reviewed WOG-2000 | : 1. Provided finding level F&Os and Was the GIII-SDS model in Y their resolution AND the PRA peer-reviewed? 2. Described how the staff SE on GIII-SDS is met, all the limitations and conditions (L&Cs) therein are satisfied, and justified any deviations. | ||
1.Demonstrated (on a plant-specific OR generic basis) why inclusion of GIII-SDS is not a PRA upgrade. | N Licensee chooses to not Y credit the GIII-SDS in the LAR? Case 2 Verify and review that the licensee: | ||
2.Described how the staff SE on GIII-SDS is met, all the L&Cs therein are | : 1. Demonstrated on the docket (via sensitivity) that the removal of credit for GIII-SDS does not affect the N decision and insights. | ||
: 2. Clarifies when, and if, the credit will be used. | |||
Did GIII-SDS modeling use a Y Case 3 peer-reviewed WOG-2000 Verify and review that the licensee: | |||
model as foundation? 1. Demonstrated (on a plant-specific OR generic basis) why inclusion of GIII-SDS is N not a PRA upgrade. | |||
: 2. Described how the staff SE on GIII-SDS is met, all Case 4 the L&Cs therein are Perform a detailed review of GIII-SDS satisfied, and justified any modeling, alignment with staff SE, and deviations. | |||
L&Cs details via audit and RAIs OR Licensee either convenes peer-review or removes credit (follow approach for Case 1 or 2, as appropriate).}} |
Latest revision as of 12:20, 21 October 2019
ML18094A000 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Issue date: | 04/04/2018 |
From: | Brian Benney NRC/NRR/DLP/PLPB |
To: | |
Benney B | |
Shared Package | |
ML18072A211 | List: |
References | |
Download: ML18094A000 (1) | |
Text
Proposed Approach for Staff Review of Plant Specific Modelling of Generation-III Shutdown Seals in License Amendment Requests (LARS)
Generation III Shutdown Seals (GIII-SDS) Modeled in PRA(s)
Used to Support LAR Case 1 (Consistent with review of peer-reviewed PRA)
Verify and review that the licensee:
- 1. Provided finding level F&Os and Was the GIII-SDS model in Y their resolution AND the PRA peer-reviewed? 2. Described how the staff SE on GIII-SDS is met, all the limitations and conditions (L&Cs) therein are satisfied, and justified any deviations.
N Licensee chooses to not Y credit the GIII-SDS in the LAR? Case 2 Verify and review that the licensee:
- 1. Demonstrated on the docket (via sensitivity) that the removal of credit for GIII-SDS does not affect the N decision and insights.
- 2. Clarifies when, and if, the credit will be used.
Did GIII-SDS modeling use a Y Case 3 peer-reviewed WOG-2000 Verify and review that the licensee:
model as foundation? 1. Demonstrated (on a plant-specific OR generic basis) why inclusion of GIII-SDS is N not a PRA upgrade.
- 2. Described how the staff SE on GIII-SDS is met, all Case 4 the L&Cs therein are Perform a detailed review of GIII-SDS satisfied, and justified any modeling, alignment with staff SE, and deviations.
L&Cs details via audit and RAIs OR Licensee either convenes peer-review or removes credit (follow approach for Case 1 or 2, as appropriate).