ML18116A025: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:Supreme Court of the United States Office of the Clerk Washington, DC | {{#Wiki_filter:USCA Case #15-1173 Document #1727825 Filed: 04/16/2018 Page 1 of 1 Supreme Court of the United States Office of the Clerk Washington, DC 20543-0001 Scott S. Harris Clerk of the Court (202) 479-3011 April 16, 2018 Clerk United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit 333 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001 Re: Beyond Nuclear | ||
: v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, et al. | |||
No. 17-1214 (Your No. 15-1173) | |||
==Dear Clerk:== | ==Dear Clerk:== | ||
The Court today entered the following order in the above-entitled case: | |||
The Court today entered the following order in the above-entitled case: | |||
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. | |||
Sincerely, Scott S. Harris, Clerk}} | |||
Latest revision as of 06:40, 21 October 2019
| ML18116A025 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 04/16/2018 |
| From: | Michelle Albert, Harris S NRC/OGC, US Federal Judiciary, Supreme Court of the United States |
| To: | US Federal Judiciary, US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit |
| References | |
| 15-1173, 17-1214, 1727825 | |
| Download: ML18116A025 (1) | |
Text
USCA Case #15-1173 Document #1727825 Filed: 04/16/2018 Page 1 of 1 Supreme Court of the United States Office of the Clerk Washington, DC 20543-0001 Scott S. Harris Clerk of the Court (202) 479-3011 April 16, 2018 Clerk United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit 333 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001 Re: Beyond Nuclear
- v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, et al.
No. 17-1214 (Your No. 15-1173)
Dear Clerk:
The Court today entered the following order in the above-entitled case:
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
Sincerely, Scott S. Harris, Clerk