ML18269A164: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
| docket = 05200025
| docket = 05200025
| license number = NPF-091
| license number = NPF-091
| contact person = Cozens I A
| contact person = Cozens I
| case reference number = ITAAC 2.3.09.03.iii
| case reference number = ITAAC 2.3.09.03.iii
| document type = ITAAC Closure Verification Evaluation Form (VEF)
| document type = ITAAC Closure Verification Evaluation Form (VEF)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ITAAC CLOSURE VERIFICATION EVALUATION FORM (VEF-ICN) Page 1 of 3 The Lead Reviewer in concert with other reviewer(s) assigned to an ITAAC closure review will complete this form for the ITAAC under review.
{{#Wiki_filter:ITAAC CLOSURE VERIFICATION EVALUATION FORM (VEF-ICN)
Docket No:
The Lead Reviewer in concert with other reviewer(s) assigned to an ITAAC closure review will complete this form for the ITAAC under review.
5200025 Plant Name
Docket No:           5200025                             Plant Name:         Vogtle Unit 3 Combined License Licensee Name:       Southern Nuclear Operating         Combined            NPF-91 Company, Inc.                       License No:
: Vogtle Unit 3 Combined License Licensee Name:
ITAAC ID No:         2.3.09.03.iii                       ITAAC Type:         Non-Targeted ITAAC Family Designation or       11A enter N/A:
Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
ITAAC Closure Notification (ICN) ADAMS ML No:                               ML18262A067 Name of Lead Reviewer:                                                       Cozens, Ian Enter Yes in the blank at the beginning of a statement below if the whole statement is true, No if the whole or part of the statement is not true, and N/A if the statement is not applicable.
Combined License No:
: a. Yes       The ICN identifies all of the following: (1) licensee, (2) plant site name, (3) unit number, and (4) plants docket number.
NPF-91 ITAAC ID No:
: b. Yes       The ITAAC as stated in the ICN matches the ITAAC as stated in the combined license.
2.3.09.03.iii ITAAC Type:
: c. Yes       NRC personnel with the requisite technical and engineering knowledge has/have determined that the ITAAC Determination Basis (IDB) of the ICN contains sufficient information including a summary of the methodology for performing the ITAAC, to demonstrate that the licensee has successfully performed the inspection, test, and/or analysis stated in the ITAAC. The methodology described in the IDB of the ICN either was reviewed and approved by the NRC, or is acceptable based on sound scientific, mathematical, and/or engineering principles, and is repeatable, if necessary, without any significant change to the reported result.
Non-Targeted ITAAC Family Designation or enter N/A:
: d. Yes       NRC personnel with the requisite technical and engineering knowledge has/have determined that the IDB of the ICN contains sufficient information to demonstrate that the licensee has fully met the entire acceptance criterion stated in the ITAAC.
11A  ITAAC Closure Notification (ICN) ADAMS ML No
: e.     N/A     For ITAAC specified as being performed on as-built structures, systems, or components (SSCs): If the licensee performed the inspections, tests, and/or analyses of the ITAAC at location(s) other than the final installed Page 1 of 3
: ML18262A067 Name of Lead Reviewer
: Cozens, Ian Enter "Yes" in the blank at the beginning of a statement below if the whole statement is true, "No" if the whole or part of the statement is not true, and "N/A" if the statement is not applicable.
: a. Yes The ICN identifies all of the following: (1) licensee, (2) plant site name, (3) unit number, and (4) plant's docket number.
: b. Yes The ITAAC as stated in the ICN matches the ITAAC as stated in the combined license
. c. Yes NRC personnel with the requisite technical and engineering knowledge has/have determined that the ITAAC Determination Basis (IDB) of the ICN contains sufficient information including a summary of the methodology for performing the ITAAC, to demonstrate that the licensee has successfully performed the inspection, test, and/or analysis stated in the ITAAC. The methodology described in the IDB of the ICN either was reviewed and approved by the NRC, or is acceptable based on sound scientific, mathematical, and/or engineering principles, and is repeatable, if necessary, without any significant change to the reported result.  
: d. Yes NRC personnel with the requisite technical and engineering knowledge has/have determined that the IDB of the ICN contains sufficient information to demonstrate that the licensee has fully met the entire acceptance criterion stated in the ITAAC.
: e. N/A For ITAAC specified as being performed on "as
-built" structures, systems, or components (SSCs):   If the licensee performed the inspections, tests, and/or analyses of the ITAAC at location(s) other than the final installed ITAAC CLOSURE VERIFICATION EVALUATION FORM (VEF-ICN)  Page 2 of 3 location, the licensee has based on the guidance in NEI 08
-01 either summarized a technical justification or provided a reference to a generic technical justification in the IDB of the ICN that establishes why it was acceptable to perform the ITAAC at location(s) other than the final installed location. [Enter N/A if the ITAAC was not performed at a remote location or if the ITAAC is not specified as "as
-built."]  f. N/A If ITAAC is a "Reference ITAAC", all the ITAAC it references have been verified as successfully completed.  (Enter "N/A" if ITAAC is not a reference ITAAC.)
: g. Yes All planned inspections for this ITAAC (if any) have been completed as indicated in the Construction Inspection Program Management System (CIPIMS). Either NRC inspectors found no ITAAC findings for this ITAAC or any ITAAC findings are closed as indicated in CIPIMS and the ICN for this ITAAC.
: h. Yes The ICN indicates that the licensee completed the ITAAC as affirmed by the signature of a licensee representative.
: i. No During concurrence review, a potential problem was identified which prevents verifying the completion of the ITAAC
: j. No An additional reviewer was assigned to the ITAAC closure review with his or her name entered into the blank at the top of this page based on his or her expertise being required.
If the reviewers have verified that the licensee successfully completed the inspections, tests, and analyses prescribed for this ITAAC, and that the acceptance criteria have been met then this determination is based on information available at the time and is subject to the licensee's ability to maintain the condition that the acceptance criteria are met. If the staff receives new information suggesting that the staff's determination on this ITAAC is incorrect, then the staff will determine whether this ITAAC should be reopened by the licensee. An affirmative NRC staff determination on this ITAAC will be used to support a subsequent finding, pursuant to 10 CFR 52.103(g), at the end of construction that all acceptance criteria in the combined license are met. The ITAAC closure verification process is not finalized for this ITAAC until the NRC makes an affirmative finding under 10 CFR 52.103(g).
Lead Reviewer:
Cozens, Ian Date: 9/24/2018  Lead Approver:
Welch, Christopher Date: 9/24/2018 Licensing PM:
Hoellman, Jordan


ITAAC CLOSURE VERIFICATION EVALUATION FORM (VEF-ICN) Page 3 of 3}}
ITAAC CLOSURE VERIFICATION EVALUATION FORM (VEF-ICN) location, the licensee has based on the guidance in NEI 08-01 either summarized a technical justification or provided a reference to a generic technical justification in the IDB of the ICN that establishes why it was acceptable to perform the ITAAC at location(s) other than the final installed location. [Enter N/A if the ITAAC was not performed at a remote location or if the ITAAC is not specified as as-built.]
: f. N/A      If ITAAC is a Reference ITAAC, all the ITAAC it references have been verified as successfully completed. (Enter N/A if ITAAC is not a reference ITAAC.)
: g. Yes      All planned inspections for this ITAAC (if any) have been completed as indicated in the Construction Inspection Program Management System (CIPIMS). Either NRC inspectors found no ITAAC findings for this ITAAC or any ITAAC findings are closed as indicated in CIPIMS and the ICN for this ITAAC.
: h. Yes      The ICN indicates that the licensee completed the ITAAC as affirmed by the signature of a licensee representative.
: i. No      During concurrence review, a potential problem was identified which prevents verifying the completion of the ITAAC
: j. No      An additional reviewer was assigned to the ITAAC closure review with his or her name entered into the blank at the top of this page based on his or her expertise being required.
If the reviewers have verified that the licensee successfully completed the inspections, tests, and analyses prescribed for this ITAAC, and that the acceptance criteria have been met then this determination is based on information available at the time and is subject to the licensees ability to maintain the condition that the acceptance criteria are met. If the staff receives new information suggesting that the staffs determination on this ITAAC is incorrect, then the staff will determine whether this ITAAC should be reopened by the licensee. An affirmative NRC staff determination on this ITAAC will be used to support a subsequent finding, pursuant to 10 CFR 52.103(g), at the end of construction that all acceptance criteria in the combined license are met. The ITAAC closure verification process is not finalized for this ITAAC until the NRC makes an affirmative finding under 10 CFR 52.103(g).
Lead Reviewer: Cozens, Ian                                                        Date: 9/24/2018 Lead Approver: Welch, Christopher                                                Date: 9/24/2018 Licensing PM: Hoellman, Jordan Page 2 of 3
 
ITAAC CLOSURE VERIFICATION EVALUATION FORM (VEF-ICN)
Page 3 of 3}}

Latest revision as of 14:10, 20 October 2019

ITAAC Closure Verification Evaluation Form (Vef) 4098 for ITAAC 2.3.09.03.iii (Index No.425 for Vogtle, Unit 3
ML18269A164
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 09/24/2018
From:
Human Performance, Operator Licensing & ITAAC Branch
To:
Cozens I
References
ITAAC 2.3.09.03.iii
Download: ML18269A164 (3)
v • d • e


Text

ITAAC CLOSURE VERIFICATION EVALUATION FORM (VEF-ICN)

The Lead Reviewer in concert with other reviewer(s) assigned to an ITAAC closure review will complete this form for the ITAAC under review.

Docket No: 5200025 Plant Name: Vogtle Unit 3 Combined License Licensee Name: Southern Nuclear Operating Combined NPF-91 Company, Inc. License No:

ITAAC ID No: 2.3.09.03.iii ITAAC Type: Non-Targeted ITAAC Family Designation or 11A enter N/A:

ITAAC Closure Notification (ICN) ADAMS ML No: ML18262A067 Name of Lead Reviewer: Cozens, Ian Enter Yes in the blank at the beginning of a statement below if the whole statement is true, No if the whole or part of the statement is not true, and N/A if the statement is not applicable.

a. Yes The ICN identifies all of the following: (1) licensee, (2) plant site name, (3) unit number, and (4) plants docket number.
b. Yes The ITAAC as stated in the ICN matches the ITAAC as stated in the combined license.
c. Yes NRC personnel with the requisite technical and engineering knowledge has/have determined that the ITAAC Determination Basis (IDB) of the ICN contains sufficient information including a summary of the methodology for performing the ITAAC, to demonstrate that the licensee has successfully performed the inspection, test, and/or analysis stated in the ITAAC. The methodology described in the IDB of the ICN either was reviewed and approved by the NRC, or is acceptable based on sound scientific, mathematical, and/or engineering principles, and is repeatable, if necessary, without any significant change to the reported result.
d. Yes NRC personnel with the requisite technical and engineering knowledge has/have determined that the IDB of the ICN contains sufficient information to demonstrate that the licensee has fully met the entire acceptance criterion stated in the ITAAC.
e. N/A For ITAAC specified as being performed on as-built structures, systems, or components (SSCs): If the licensee performed the inspections, tests, and/or analyses of the ITAAC at location(s) other than the final installed Page 1 of 3

ITAAC CLOSURE VERIFICATION EVALUATION FORM (VEF-ICN) location, the licensee has based on the guidance in NEI 08-01 either summarized a technical justification or provided a reference to a generic technical justification in the IDB of the ICN that establishes why it was acceptable to perform the ITAAC at location(s) other than the final installed location. [Enter N/A if the ITAAC was not performed at a remote location or if the ITAAC is not specified as as-built.]

f. N/A If ITAAC is a Reference ITAAC, all the ITAAC it references have been verified as successfully completed. (Enter N/A if ITAAC is not a reference ITAAC.)
g. Yes All planned inspections for this ITAAC (if any) have been completed as indicated in the Construction Inspection Program Management System (CIPIMS). Either NRC inspectors found no ITAAC findings for this ITAAC or any ITAAC findings are closed as indicated in CIPIMS and the ICN for this ITAAC.
h. Yes The ICN indicates that the licensee completed the ITAAC as affirmed by the signature of a licensee representative.
i. No During concurrence review, a potential problem was identified which prevents verifying the completion of the ITAAC
j. No An additional reviewer was assigned to the ITAAC closure review with his or her name entered into the blank at the top of this page based on his or her expertise being required.

If the reviewers have verified that the licensee successfully completed the inspections, tests, and analyses prescribed for this ITAAC, and that the acceptance criteria have been met then this determination is based on information available at the time and is subject to the licensees ability to maintain the condition that the acceptance criteria are met. If the staff receives new information suggesting that the staffs determination on this ITAAC is incorrect, then the staff will determine whether this ITAAC should be reopened by the licensee. An affirmative NRC staff determination on this ITAAC will be used to support a subsequent finding, pursuant to 10 CFR 52.103(g), at the end of construction that all acceptance criteria in the combined license are met. The ITAAC closure verification process is not finalized for this ITAAC until the NRC makes an affirmative finding under 10 CFR 52.103(g).

Lead Reviewer: Cozens, Ian Date: 9/24/2018 Lead Approver: Welch, Christopher Date: 9/24/2018 Licensing PM: Hoellman, Jordan Page 2 of 3

ITAAC CLOSURE VERIFICATION EVALUATION FORM (VEF-ICN)

Page 3 of 3

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18269A164&oldid=1922100"