ML19239A160: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Code of Federal Regulations
{{#Wiki_filter:August 23, 2019 Mr. C. Shane Denning Radiation Safety Officer Garrison Safety Office Department of the Army United States Army Garrison, Fort Polk 7130 Pennsylvania Loop, Building 4209, Module D Fort Polk, LA 71459-5339


/RA/}}
==SUBJECT:==
NRC REVIEW OF NONCOMPLIANCE IDENTIFIED AT FORT POLK
 
==Dear Mr. Denning:==
 
On June 7, 2019, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) became aware that the Fort Polk U.S. Army facility was erroneously licensed under the authority of the State of Louisiana, Emergency and Radiological Services Division, Office of Environmental Compliance, Department of Environmental Quality. On or around July 5, 2001, the State of Louisiana issued License LA-10445-L01 to Joint Readiness Training Center (JRTC) and Fort Polk, Department of Public Works (DPW), United States Army Environmental and Natural Resources Management Division (ENRMD).
The State of Louisiana did not have the authority under its Agreement with the NRC (available on the NRC website at: https://scp.nrc.gov/special/regs/laagreements.pdf) to license the possession, use, and storage of byproduct materials at Fort Polk as an entity of the U.S. Federal Government. The State of Louisianas Agreement with the NRC did not transfer regulatory authority to the State over activities of federal agencies within the State. As a result, Fort Polk was in noncompliance with NRC rules and regulations, as Fort Polk lacked an NRC license to possess, use, and store specifically-licensed byproduct materials as defined in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 30.4.
The NRCs review of the facts and circumstances of this noncompliance determined that:
(1) although Fort Polk did not hold an NRC license, it did, erroneously, hold a license with the State of Louisiana, which provided regulatory control and safety and security oversight; (2) the types and quantities of byproduct material possessed by Fort Polk (two 12 mCi cobalt-57 Protec Instrument Corporation RMD LPA-1 x-ray fluorescence (XRF) devices used for lead paint analysis) represented a low health and safety hazard; (3) the aforementioned devices could have been possessed by Fort Polk under a general license authorized by the NRC under 10 CFR 31.5 had the devices been distributed as a generally licensed device rather than a specific license device (Sealed Source and Device Registry MA-1383-D-101-B); and (4) Fort Polk representatives took immediate and comprehensive corrective actions to return the two XRF devices to the manufacturer for relabeling and redistribution to Fort Polk as a generally licensed device.
 
C. Denning                                      2 The noncompliance was evaluated in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy, which can be found at the NRCs Web site at:
http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/enforcement/enforce-pol.html. Based on the results of the NRCs review, the NRC has concluded that the noncompliance was minor in significance and that in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy Section 2.3.1 and in consideration for the corrective actions already completed, no further enforcement action is warranted.
You are not required to respond to this letter. However, should you choose to respond, your response should be sent to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Regional Administrator, Region IV, 1600 E. Lamar Blvd., Arlington, Texas 76011 within 30 days of the date of this letter.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Agency Rules of Practice and Procedures, a copy of this letter and your response, should you choose to provide one, will be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs ADAMS, accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
Should you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Mr. Jason vonEhr at (817) 200-1186.
Sincerely,
                                                        /RA/
Patricia A. Silva, Chief Materials Inspection Branch Division of Nuclear Materials Safety Docket: 999-90004 License: General License under 10 CFR 31.5 cc:
Jeff Dauzat, Administrator State of Louisiana Radiation Control Program
 
C. Denning                                            3 NRC REVIEW OF NONCOMPLIANCE IDENTIFIED AT FORT POLK - DATED August 23, 2019 DISTRIBUTION:
M. Shaffer, DRA L. Howell, Acting_D/DNMS R4DNMS_MIB R4DNMS_MLB S:\DNMS\Lynn DOC\Fort Polk - Closure Letter.docx SUNSI Review:            ADAMS:              Non-Publicly Available Non-Sensitive Keyword:
By: JEV                    Yes  No          Publicly Available      Sensitive OFFICE          DNMS:MIB      RC              C:MIB NAME            JEvonEhr      DCylkowski      PASilva SIGNATURE        /RA/          /RA/            /RA/
DATE            8/21/19      8/21/19          8/23/19 OFFICAL RECORD COPY}}

Latest revision as of 23:57, 7 October 2019

Department of the Army, United States Army Garrison, Fort Polk, NRC Review of Noncompliance Identified at Fort Polk
ML19239A160
Person / Time
Site: 99990004
Issue date: 08/23/2019
From: Patricia Silva
NRC Region 4
To: Denning C
US Dept of the Army
References
Download: ML19239A160 (3)


Text

August 23, 2019 Mr. C. Shane Denning Radiation Safety Officer Garrison Safety Office Department of the Army United States Army Garrison, Fort Polk 7130 Pennsylvania Loop, Building 4209, Module D Fort Polk, LA 71459-5339

SUBJECT:

NRC REVIEW OF NONCOMPLIANCE IDENTIFIED AT FORT POLK

Dear Mr. Denning:

On June 7, 2019, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) became aware that the Fort Polk U.S. Army facility was erroneously licensed under the authority of the State of Louisiana, Emergency and Radiological Services Division, Office of Environmental Compliance, Department of Environmental Quality. On or around July 5, 2001, the State of Louisiana issued License LA-10445-L01 to Joint Readiness Training Center (JRTC) and Fort Polk, Department of Public Works (DPW), United States Army Environmental and Natural Resources Management Division (ENRMD).

The State of Louisiana did not have the authority under its Agreement with the NRC (available on the NRC website at: https://scp.nrc.gov/special/regs/laagreements.pdf) to license the possession, use, and storage of byproduct materials at Fort Polk as an entity of the U.S. Federal Government. The State of Louisianas Agreement with the NRC did not transfer regulatory authority to the State over activities of federal agencies within the State. As a result, Fort Polk was in noncompliance with NRC rules and regulations, as Fort Polk lacked an NRC license to possess, use, and store specifically-licensed byproduct materials as defined in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 30.4.

The NRCs review of the facts and circumstances of this noncompliance determined that:

(1) although Fort Polk did not hold an NRC license, it did, erroneously, hold a license with the State of Louisiana, which provided regulatory control and safety and security oversight; (2) the types and quantities of byproduct material possessed by Fort Polk (two 12 mCi cobalt-57 Protec Instrument Corporation RMD LPA-1 x-ray fluorescence (XRF) devices used for lead paint analysis) represented a low health and safety hazard; (3) the aforementioned devices could have been possessed by Fort Polk under a general license authorized by the NRC under 10 CFR 31.5 had the devices been distributed as a generally licensed device rather than a specific license device (Sealed Source and Device Registry MA-1383-D-101-B); and (4) Fort Polk representatives took immediate and comprehensive corrective actions to return the two XRF devices to the manufacturer for relabeling and redistribution to Fort Polk as a generally licensed device.

C. Denning 2 The noncompliance was evaluated in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy, which can be found at the NRCs Web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/enforcement/enforce-pol.html. Based on the results of the NRCs review, the NRC has concluded that the noncompliance was minor in significance and that in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy Section 2.3.1 and in consideration for the corrective actions already completed, no further enforcement action is warranted.

You are not required to respond to this letter. However, should you choose to respond, your response should be sent to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Regional Administrator, Region IV, 1600 E. Lamar Blvd., Arlington, Texas 76011 within 30 days of the date of this letter.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Agency Rules of Practice and Procedures, a copy of this letter and your response, should you choose to provide one, will be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs ADAMS, accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.

Should you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Mr. Jason vonEhr at (817) 200-1186.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Patricia A. Silva, Chief Materials Inspection Branch Division of Nuclear Materials Safety Docket: 999-90004 License: General License under 10 CFR 31.5 cc:

Jeff Dauzat, Administrator State of Louisiana Radiation Control Program

C. Denning 3 NRC REVIEW OF NONCOMPLIANCE IDENTIFIED AT FORT POLK - DATED August 23, 2019 DISTRIBUTION:

M. Shaffer, DRA L. Howell, Acting_D/DNMS R4DNMS_MIB R4DNMS_MLB S:\DNMS\Lynn DOC\Fort Polk - Closure Letter.docx SUNSI Review: ADAMS: Non-Publicly Available Non-Sensitive Keyword:

By: JEV Yes No Publicly Available Sensitive OFFICE DNMS:MIB RC C:MIB NAME JEvonEhr DCylkowski PASilva SIGNATURE /RA/ /RA/ /RA/

DATE 8/21/19 8/21/19 8/23/19 OFFICAL RECORD COPY