ML100840084: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 03/23/2010 | | issue date = 03/23/2010 | ||
| title = University of Irvine License Renewal E-mail from George Miller Regarding Revised Maximum Dose from a Mha | | title = University of Irvine License Renewal E-mail from George Miller Regarding Revised Maximum Dose from a Mha | ||
| author name = Miller G | | author name = Miller G | ||
| author affiliation = Univ of California - Irvine | | author affiliation = Univ of California - Irvine | ||
| addressee name = Miller G | | addressee name = Miller G, Montgomery C | ||
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DPR/PRTA, Univ of California - Irvine | | addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DPR/PRTA, Univ of California - Irvine | ||
| docket = 05000326 | | docket = 05000326 | ||
Revision as of 11:14, 11 July 2019
| ML100840084 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | University of California - Irvine |
| Issue date: | 03/23/2010 |
| From: | Geoffrey Miller University of California - Irvine |
| To: | Geoffrey Miller, Cindy Montgomery Research and Test Reactors Licensing Branch, University of California - Irvine |
| MONTGOMERY C, NRR/DPR/PRLB 415-3398 | |
| References | |
| Download: ML100840084 (2) | |
Text
From:George Miller [gemiller@uci.edu]Sent:Tuesday, March 23, 2010 3:06 PM To:Montgomery, Cindy; George Miller (gemiller@uci.edu)
Subject:
Correction to FAQ response submitted- Appendix F.
Ms Montgomery:
In UCI's recent submission to your RAI, I have reviewed the response, and realized that the
thyroid exposure predicted for our MHA was over estimated in several
ways.
In addition to not adjusting for a realistic operating schedule instead
of "infinite operation at full
power", we did not allow for any plating of iodine isotopes on surfaces
that would significantly
reduce the airborne concentration, and hence significantly reduce the
anticipated thyroid
exposure rate and hence the total calculated exposure.
In Oregon State University's SAR, they adopted a method which suggests
halogen release
plates out to reduce the airborne concentrations to less than 25% of the
initial release.
Thus I wish to revise my dose rate expected to the thyroid in the
unlikely event of a water "free" fuel element cladding rupture, to 0.25 x 0.45 rads/second = 0.11
rads/second .
Given this rate and the 2 minute evacuation time for personnel from the
facility, the revised
maximum dose would be 13.2 Rads to the thyroid.
I hope you can accept this late revision to provide a more realistic, but still very conservative
estimate of potential exposure.
Thank you.
Regards.E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties (4BA910FA.9090906)
Subject:
Correction to FAQ response submitted- Appendix F.Sent Date:3/23/2010 3:05:44 PM Received Date:3/23/2010 3:05:44 PM From:George MillerCreated By: gemiller@uci.edu
Recipients:
Cindy.Montgomery@nrc.gov (Montgomery, Cindy)
Tracking Status: None gemiller@uci.edu (George Miller (gemiller@uci.edu))
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
uci.eduFilesSizeDate & TimeMESSAGE36253/23/2010 Options Expiration Date:
Priority:olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested:False Return Notification:False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received: