ML12192A110: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 9: Line 9:
| docket = 05000391
| docket = 05000391
| license number =  
| license number =  
| contact person = Poole J C
| contact person = Poole J
| document type = - No Document Type Applies
| document type = - No Document Type Applies
| page count = 3
| page count = 3

Revision as of 15:54, 28 June 2019

Fws 2010 Dromedary Pearkymussel
ML12192A110
Person / Time
Site: Watts Bar Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 05/17/2010
From:
US Dept of Interior, Fish & Wildlife Service
To:
Watts Bar Special Projects Branch
Poole J
References
Download: ML12192A110 (3)


Text

DROMEDARY PEARLYMUSSEL http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/life_histories/F00K.html

[5/17/2010 9:24:23 AM]DROMEDARY PEARLYMUSSELDromus dromas

SPECIES CODE: F00K I01 STATUS:

On June 14, 1976, the dromedary pearlymussel was designated as endangered throughout its entire range in Kentucky, Tennessee, and Virginia (USFWS 1976), except where listed as experimental populations (in the free-flowing reach of the Tennessee River below the Wilson Dam, Colbert and Lauderdale Counties, AL) (USFWS 2001). A recovery plan addressing the dromedary pearlymussel was approved in July 9, 1984 (USFWS 1984).

SPECIES DESCRIPTION:

The dromedary pearlymussel is a medium-sized (reaching up to 90 mm in length) freshwater mussel with a yellowish green shell with two sets of broken green rays.

The life span of the species is greater than 50 years (USFWS 1984,VFWIS 2003).

Like other freshwater mussels, the dromedary pearlymussel feeds by filtering food particles from thewater column. The specific food habits of the species are unknown, but other juvenile and adult freshwater mussels have been documented to feed on detritus, diatoms, phytoplankton, and zooplankton (Churchill and Lewis 1924).

Thediet of dromedary pearlymussel glochidia, like other freshwater mussels, comprises water (until encysted on a fish host) and fish body fluids (once encysted).

REPRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT:

The reproductive cycle of the dromedary pearlymussel is similar to that of other native freshwater mussels. Males release sperm into the water column; the sperm are then taken in by the females through their siphons during feeding and respiration.

The females retain the fertilized eggs in their gills until the larvae (glochidia) fully develop. Themussel glochidia are released into the water, and within a few days they must attach to the appropriate species of fish, which they parasitize for a short time while they develop into juvenile mussels. The species is bradytictic and glochidia are contained in conglutinates that are similar in appearance to freshwater leeches or flatworms (Jones and Neves

2001). In a recent investigation, a fecundity of approximately 55 to 250,000 glochidia per mussel was estimated forthe dromedary pearlymussel by determining the mean number of mature glochidia associated with conglutinates from four females.

Ages of valves examined indicate that the species life span is as long as 25 years (Jones and Neves 2001). Recent studies have identified the fantail darter (Etheostoma flabellare) as a glochidial host for the dromedary pearlymussel.

Laboratory studies also identified the following potential host species: the banded darter (Etheostoma zonale), tangerine darter (Percina aurantiaca), logperch (Percina caprodes), and gilt darter (Percina evides) (Watsonand Neves 1998).

Jones and Neves (2001) recently confirmed the suitability of the banded darter, tangerine darter, andlogperch and identified the following additional glochidial host species: black sculpin (Cottus baileyi), greenside darter (Etheostoma blennioides), snubnose darter (Etheostoma simoterum), blotchside logperch (Percina burtoni), channeldarter (Percina copelandi), and Roanoke darter (Percina roanoka

).

RANGE AND POPULATION LEVEL:This species was historically widespread in the Cumberland and Tennessee River systems (Bogan and Parmalee 1983). It was last collected from Mussel Shoals, an 85 km reach of the Tennessee River in Alabama, prior to 1931(van der Schalie 1939) and is presumed to be extirpated from the shoal.

The species survives at a few shoals in thePowell and Clinch Rivers in Tennessee and Virginia, and possibly in the Cumberland River in Tennessee (USFWS 1984, Neves 1991).

Nine occurrences of the species were recorded during a 1980 survey by Virginia Tech and theTennessee Valley Authority; however, the dromedary pearlymussel is currently believed to be reduced to only three reproducing populations (NatureServe 2003).

HABITAT:

The dromedary pearlymussel inhabits small to medium, low turbidity, high to moderate gradient streams.

The speciesis commonly found near riffles on sand and gravel substrates with stable rubble (USFWS 1984).

Though commonlyassociated with shallow, high velocity riffles and shoals, individuals have been found in deeper (up to 18 feet in depth), slower waters (USFWS 1984).

DROMEDARY PEARLYMUSSEL http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/life_histories/F00K.html

[5/17/2010 9:24:23 AM]

PAST THREATS:Many of the historic populations of the dromedary pearlymussel were apparently lost when the river sections they inhabited were impounded.

Over 50 impoundments on the Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers have eliminated the majority of riverine habitat for the species in its historic range (ESIS 1996, USFWS 1984).

The Powell River andupper tributaries of the Clinch River, in particular, are also subject to sediment and particulate matter loading from coal mining activities (Stansbery 1973).

Other threats that are attributed to population declines are similar to thosedescribed in the general mussel description.

CURRENT THREATS:

Other current threats to freshwater mussels are well documented in the general mussel description.

CONSERVATION MEASURES:

Exposure Scenario Summary Table for the Dromedary Pearlymussel

Species Life Stage

Habitat Type

Exposure Route Diet Significant

Interspecies

Relationships

dromedary pearlymussel

glochidia parasite contact with water, diet

water (until encysted), fish

body fluids (once encysted) fantail darter banded darter tangerine darter

logperch gilt darter black sculpin greenside darter snubnose darter

blotchside

logperch channel darter Roanoke darter

juvenile /

adult sediment dweller contact &

ingestion of water, diet, sediment filter feeder (bacteria, algae, detritus, sediment)

LITERATURE CITED:

Bogan, A.E. and P.W. Parmalee. 1983. Tennessee's rare wildlife. Vol. 2: The mollusks. Tennessee Wildlife ResourcesAgency and the Tennessee Conservation Department. 123 pp.

Churchill, E.P., Jr., and S.I. Lewis.

1924. Food and feeding in freshwater mussels.

Bull. U.S. Bur. Fish. 39: 439-471.

Endangered Species Information Exchange. 1996 Species Id ESIS404017.

Virginia Tech Fish and WildlifeInformation Exchange.

Available http://fwie.fw.vt.edu/WWW/esis/lists/e404017.htm.

(Accessed: December 2, 2003)

Jones, J.W. and R.J. Neves.

2001. Life history aspects of the endangered dromedary pearlymussel, Dromus dromas.

In: Proceedings of the 2 nd Meeting of the Freshwater Mollusk Conservation Society.

Pittsburgh, PA.

March 11-14.

DROMEDARY PEARLYMUSSEL http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/life_histories/F00K.html

[5/17/2010 9:24:23 AM]

NatureServe. 2003. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 1.8. NatureServe,Arlington, Virginia. Available http://www.natureserve.org/explorer. (Accessed: December 2, 2003 ).

Neves, R.J.

1991. Mollusks. In: Virginia's Endangered Species: Proceedings of a Symposium held at Va. Tech. April1989. The McDonald and Woodward Publishing Company, Blacksburg.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1976. Endangered Status for 159 Taxa of Animals. Federal Register 41: 24062-24067.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1984. Recovery plan for the Dromedary Pearly Mussel; Dromus dromas

. Atlanta, GA.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

2001. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Establishment of NonessentialExperimental Population Status for 16 Freshwater Mussels and 1 Freshwater Snail (Anthony's Riversnail) in the Free-Flowing Reach of the Tennessee River below the Wilson Dam, Colbert and Lauderdale Counties, AL. Federal Register 66(115): 32250-32264.

van der Schalie, H.

1939. Additional notes on the naiades (freshwater mussels) of the lower Tennessee River.

TheAmerican Midland Naturalist.

22: 452-457.

Watson, B.T. and R.J. Neves.

1998. Fish host identification for two federally endangered unionids in the upperTennessee River drainage.

Triannual Unionid Report No. 14. March 1998.

Available http://ellipse.inhs.uiuc.edu/FMCS/TUR/TUR14.html.

(Accessed: December 2, 2003).