ML15013A278: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 12/17/2014
| issue date = 12/17/2014
| title = 12-17-14 Prairie Island Indian Comm Second Letter
| title = 12-17-14 Prairie Island Indian Comm Second Letter
| author name = Halloran J F
| author name = Halloran J
| author affiliation = Jacobson, Magnuson, Anderson & Halloran P.C.
| author affiliation = Jacobson, Magnuson, Anderson & Halloran P.C.
| addressee name = Langer M J
| addressee name = Langer M
| addressee affiliation = NRC/OGC, US Federal Judiciary, US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
| addressee affiliation = NRC/OGC, US Federal Judiciary, US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
| docket = 05000282, 05000306
| docket = 05000282, 05000306

Revision as of 04:16, 21 June 2019

12-17-14 Prairie Island Indian Comm Second Letter
ML15013A278
Person / Time
Site: Prairie Island  Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/17/2014
From: Halloran J
Jacobson, Magnuson, Anderson & Halloran P.C.
To: Langer M
NRC/OGC, US Federal Judiciary, US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Creedon, Meghan
References
14-1212
Download: ML15013A278 (1)


Text

Joseph F. Halloran l Shareholder Attorney at Law (651) 644-4710 E-mail: jhalloran@thejacobsonlawgroup.com

December 1 7 , 2014 Mark J. Langer, Clerk U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit 333 Constitution Avenue N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20001

-2866

SUBJECT:

Prairie Island Indian Community v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

No. 14-1212 (consolidated with Nos. 14

-1210, 14-1216, 14-1217)

Dear Mr. Langer:

Enclosed herewith for filing is the Petitioner Prairie Island Indian Community's Amended Docketing Statement, which amends and supplements the Community's original Docketing Statement filed with the Court on December 1, 2014.

The Amended Docketing Statement supplements the Community's response to question 6(g), which asks for identification of cases "which involve substantially the same issues as the instant case presents," and identifies a matter now pending before the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB). The Federal Respondents' counsel Andrew Averbach referenced this ASLB proceeding in his December 5, 2014 letter to you.

The Community respectfully disagrees with Mr. Averbach's assertion that the issue raised in the context of the ASLB proceeding is "substantially similar" to the issues presented in the context of this appeal, and his suggestion that the Community has failed to exhaust its administrative remedies , but nevertheless identifies the ASLB proceeding in its Amended Docketing Statemen t as a professional courtesy and out of an abundance of caution.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely, /s/Joseph Halloran Joseph F. Halloran

Enclosure (as stated)

Cc: Philip R. Mahowald, PIIC General Counsel Service L is t USCA Case #14-1212 Document #1527918 Filed: 12/17/2014 Page 1 of 1