ML16272A093: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 22: Line 22:
Al Tardiff
Al Tardiff


Recommended Staff Action: Reviewed, issues identified for future consideration  
Recommended Staff Action: Reviewed, issues identified for future consideration
: 1. What are the known technical or regulatory issues with the current version of the Regulatory Guide (RG)?
: 1. What are the known technical or regulatory issues with the current version of the Regulatory Guide (RG)?
This 1978 document is dated in numerous technical and regulatory areas, including references to outdated regulations.
This 1978 document is dated in numerous technical and regulatory areas, including references to outdated regulations.
: 2. What is the impact on internal and external stakeholders of not updating the RG for the known issues, in terms of anticipated numbers of licensing and inspection activities over the next several years?
: 2. What is the impact on internal and external stakeholders of not updating the RG for the known issues, in terms of anticipated numbers of licensing and inspection activities over the next several years?
The staff does not expect any new licensing actions relevant to this guide in the next several years and current licensees may continue to use RG 5.55. The staff does not anticipate any impact on not updating the RG at this point.
The staff does not expect any new licensing actions relevant to this guide in the next several years and current licensees may continue to use RG 5.55. The staff does not anticipate any impact on not updating the RG at this point.
: 3. What is an estimate of the level of effort needed to address identified issues in terms of full-time equivalent (FTE) and contractor resources?  
: 3. What is an estimate of the level of effort needed to address identified issues in terms of full-time equivalent (FTE) and contractor resources?  


Approximately 0.2 full-time equivalency (FTE) will be required to complete a revision.
Approximately 0.2 full-time equivalency (FTE) will be required to complete a revision.
: 4. Based on the answers to the questions above, what is the staff action for this guide (Reviewed with no issues identified, Reviewed with issues identified for future consideration, Revise, or Withdraw)?  
: 4. Based on the answers to the questions above, what is the staff action for this guide (Reviewed with no issues identified, Reviewed with issues identified for future consideration, Revise, or Withdraw)?  


Reviewed with issues identified for future consideration.  
Reviewed with issues identified for future consideration.
: 5. Provide a conceptual plan and timeframe to address the issues identified during the review.  
: 5. Provide a conceptual plan and timeframe to address the issues identified during the review.  



Revision as of 00:32, 27 April 2019

Periodic Review of Regulatory Guide 5.55, Standard Format and Content of Safeguards Contingency Plans for Fuel Cycle Facilities
ML16272A093
Person / Time
Issue date: 10/21/2016
From: Galloway M A
Division of Security Policy
To: Thomas B E
Division of Engineering
Held W W
Shared Package
ML16272A044 List:
References
Download: ML16272A093 (2)


Text

Enclosure 5 Regulatory Guide Periodic Review Regulatory Guide Number:

5.55 Revision Number:

0 Title: Standard Format and Content of Safeguards Contingency Plans for Fuel Cycle Facilities Office:

NSIR/DSP Technical Lead:

Al Tardiff

Recommended Staff Action: Reviewed, issues identified for future consideration

1. What are the known technical or regulatory issues with the current version of the Regulatory Guide (RG)?

This 1978 document is dated in numerous technical and regulatory areas, including references to outdated regulations.

2. What is the impact on internal and external stakeholders of not updating the RG for the known issues, in terms of anticipated numbers of licensing and inspection activities over the next several years?

The staff does not expect any new licensing actions relevant to this guide in the next several years and current licensees may continue to use RG 5.55. The staff does not anticipate any impact on not updating the RG at this point.

3. What is an estimate of the level of effort needed to address identified issues in terms of full-time equivalent (FTE) and contractor resources?

Approximately 0.2 full-time equivalency (FTE) will be required to complete a revision.

4. Based on the answers to the questions above, what is the staff action for this guide (Reviewed with no issues identified, Reviewed with issues identified for future consideration, Revise, or Withdraw)?

Reviewed with issues identified for future consideration.

5. Provide a conceptual plan and timeframe to address the issues identified during the review.

A decision on the future of the associated Part 73 rulemaking is expected in FY 2017. If the rulemaking continues, this RG will be withdrawn. If the rulemaking is discontinued, the RG will be revised.

Note: This review was conducted in October 2016 and reflects the staff's plans as of that date. These plans are tentative and subject to change.