ML083260525: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
#REDIRECT [[RS-08-152, Supplemental Information Concerning Relief Request CR-26 Associated with the Second 10-Year Inservice Inspection (ISI) Interval]]
| number = ML083260525
| issue date = 11/18/2008
| title = LaSalle, Units 1 and 2, Supplemental Information Concerning Relief Request CR-26 Associated with the Second 10-Year Inservice Inspection (ISI) Interval
| author name = Simpson P R
| author affiliation = Exelon Generation Co, LLC, Exelon Nuclear
| addressee name =
| addressee affiliation = NRC/Document Control Desk, NRC/NRR
| docket = 05000373, 05000374
| license number = NPF-011, NPF-018
| contact person =
| case reference number = RS-08-152
| document type = Letter
| page count = 437
| project =
| stage = Supplement
}}
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ExelknExelon Generation www.exeloncorp.com Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555 10 CFR 50.55a RS-08-152 November 18, 2008 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-1 1 and NPF-1 8 NRC Docket Nos. 50-373 and 50-374
 
==Subject:==
Supplemental Information Concerning Relief Request CR-26 Associated with the Second 10-Year Inservice Inspection (ISI) Interval  
 
==Reference:==
 
Letter from Patrick R. Simpson (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to the NRC,"Relief Request CR-26, Inservice Inspection Program Relief Regarding Examination Coverage for Second 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval," dated October 1, 2008 In the referenced letter, Exelon Generation Company, LLC (EGC), requested relief from the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI, "Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components," for LaSalle County Station (LSCS) Units 1 and 2. Specifically, CR-26 requested relief on the basis that compliance with the specified requirements is impractical due to plant design. This relief applies to the second 10-year interval inservice inspection program, which concluded on October 1, 2007.In a teleconference on November 6, 2008, EGC agreed to provide supplemental information to the NRC regarding relief request CR-26. This supplemental information is provided in the attachment to this letter.This letter contains no regulatory commitments.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Ms. Tricia A. Mattson at (630) 657-2813.Respectfully, atrick R. mpson Manager -Licensing
 
==Attachment:==
 
Supplemental Information Regarding Relief Requests Associated With the Second Inservice Inspection Interval -LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 November 18, 2008 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 cc: Regional Administrator
-NRC Region III NRC Senior Resident Inspector
-LaSalle County Station Attachment Supplemental Information LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Relief Request CR-26 REVI 'me 44e-22o W46 91 &C0 SEt 0 c,7e A E1.fjZI4 NI Brou"Tht Upto 154 /417_ __ .... -2oQ- "
* tu ,, i, -, l ,.,A i 4 ", #at / 4ete WFC 1- 7-76 Pc. No. Prefix Pc. No. Prefix D.W.P. and D.W.P. and Dwg. No. Weld No. Suffix Dwg. No. Title Dwg. No. Weld No. SuffixI Dwg. No. _'itle A-245-515 A-245-830 A-245-831 A-245-832 A-245-833 A-245-834 A-245-836 A-245-837 A-245-838 A-245-839 A-245-84o A-245-841 A-245-842 A-245-843 A-245-845 A-245-847 A-245-849 A-245-851 A-245-852 A-245-853 A-245-854 A-245-857 A-245-858 A-24 5-8 59 2-?45-863 301 302 303 304 305 3o6 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343.344 E- 232- 788 E-232- 843 E-232- 898 E-232-789 E-2320" E-232-790 E-232-791 E-23?-861 E-232-862 E-232-792 E-232-793 E-232-794 E-232-879 E-2132e93Q E-232-863 E=232-880 E-232-839 E-232-911 E-232-801 E-232-936 F-233-814 E-232-795 E-232-796 E-232-797 E-232- 923 E-232- 937 E-232-840 E.232-802 E-232-924 E-232-799 E-232-781 E-232-782 E-232-928 E-232-841 R-232-930 P-232-931 R-232-932 E-232-933 E-232-847 E-232-814 E-232- 939 E-232-800 E-232-02 3 General Arrangement
-Elevation General ArsngemePt
-Plans Stainlees Steel Safe Ends vessel Shells Forming & Fit-up Bottom Head Machining
& Welding Lower Vessel Shell Ass'y. Machinilng and Welding Upper Vessel Shell Ass'y. Machining and Welding Vessel Support Skirt -Details & Ass'y.Bottom Head--Penetrations Vessel Machining Vessel Machining Vessel Assembly Nozzle Details Nozzle Details Nozzle Details Nozzle Details'loSure Head Nozzle Details Closure Head Machining
& Welding Closure Head Final Machining Miscellaneous Details Miscellaneous Details Vessel Internal Attachments Vessel External Attachments Vessel External Attachments Stud, Nut, and Washer Details Shroud Support, Details & Ass'y.Nozzle Thermal Liners In--Service Inspectign Patchbu Mat'l. for Fabricating Test Specimen Mat'l. Identification As-Built Dimensions As-Built Dimensions
-Bot. Hd. Penet.Closure Head Shipping Details & Ass'y.Nozzle Shipping Covers Flange Cover Details & Ass'y.Lifting Beam Details & Ass'y.Vessel Upending Device & Lower Cover Details & Ass'y.Vessel Shipping Rig Details Vessel Shipping Assay.Shipping Arrangement on Barge Miscellaneous Shipping Details Modified Vessel Shipping Rig Assembly LIT ICALISRKTION8 BLOCV tETKILS A-200-263 A-200-081 A-200-083 A-200-085 Miscellaneous Repairs and ;'emporar[;
Attachments (DWP)Standard Notes Material Notes M&P Specs.h I _________
I o- ,CHATTANOOGA to,-286'(SRAWING PLAR- LT-_. NERAL ELECTiRIC CO.251" I.D. B-TI V I-"'~ '..w,- .Ik~nf'o COMBUSTIO ENGIEERIN.
I.N ,NC.. WINDSOR. CONN.11 ORAWINO NO n~~nkaL.., --D NO .--2 -V-W7I 7'ý%
I I 7 6 5 I -< 4.109"ZCz-:3 4,4.7 41 Amr 441'o) 0~~7A~L t'(B-SJ SCA4E 04fl0'Ti C~404W ~ AM a,6,~ -~ 4 v/43WO/Gj 0' DA'a I EED*3.7O-"-S 't.9)-' ---- J71 27d-~V4-4--I, i i C-A'FA',4 M9r=ES = ZrW)-WACT 4/ L- .LU3 L 444M4 0f r 0 , I I 4~~0C~054 C0 A fl O N- ic 01 K _* S0 M7~1 ~~rzzZ CLOSURqE HEADO F7AAL MACHINING*~ ~ 1232iL-801Z3 I I_6.7
-a-- / S I , ~. 4 -I...... .-..., / .. " n_ l ..... -... .. .... .____,,_ L k \ \ Tz;L~ .4Q... .:L -' J// a.a. ..I'L-"6 /D. -, ,- ..WI.wr , I. "4,,i aIr state .-..- ...f, b --':.... .- ... < .....-... ....' " =.:..,- : ."=--. .'--2f=l:]i
"------- -__ _ -........ -.... .... _ ....__ _ :_- .. -j C AC ~fl 4. COAt ACat at.' aSs'S I...
_ ELL -Em-i , O~ttr. tl__2....O-Z-400'- .. 7"/-- ._ tC ..SCA&#xfd;C I x,-",' - a. j" A ~''D~~ ~TfeAC~~isa. -74,~ '(65)a,'-A ~t AtrtaAt 07*5 57* ink tao j AVAA~tCA&S 400.4Cr -Ii i i i i i FSAn MatS 550Sf 04 5 ScwSaS A -, '0 A *~* '*~* 'P ms ,, apACa sit ., .47-a.tM.,r (AC) -,'an SA 70-eI aSCiT a. /M5~* S..
Car tat Mraa.ta 4 Ma TA -ST. -S 7) .au~aM ZI *7*5 .CAOSSW 'ado S 'SO-At/Os) ta's/k Men--I.A.. -- .- A. -4A1M -....... I-ff. 7A A25.-i- _e .a .I,..-
!5 H A j 73- !-m1 ;0'm45-. W-II J AA -0 Z"~4 : 0- .l&#xfd; M DK -3.8 -I?- t r lt4 C7,'UNA~ -=EWW 33.-a ~ '. -a55 A137OF 05-sC AA A7WY WL 3 AeaSA4V~SAlA SAtSAE2tosn
--cr-C 130 /IS REA-eo0 000?'A A rv./e~ AA, OAAO A (-'-I!"" rl-6 I E2279C6 G 5-I-i;&#xfd;Wj &#xfd; --
I 9 a 3 2 t HI .! .. .. ... -........ .. -I, ..,1" 'I I (AZZE INVENT A~ZZLE ASSEMBlY SAS54-I'-O.-L, 4 *FIRa F d
 
0, , 4-a ",**I 4~e'aao 3 SSSe 31811 vA/NST!&#xfd; A'IJMBWVrA7A7 OV IWZ 55 1-ala~~~C~
-Ms C., ~z AW, MI IsIS-DW lMM0 '0_____________-IS--
C"l -ZZ '50 ir MN SMoO.,S 5 S T E 2 Ma ft- , 0 I $ S ' ' M -f M AS I tNAJ 00r 0AA..cm0 Acreso .-,o,-swi W, A&#xfd;&#xfd;SO. ~O,.'W .A.'oWn- 1,.AI~. ~ 232-839 .a I!1 3 1I Z.41.t&
P--o ..... .e o -..-, ' , -i _----7 _ __J ..A, -- " .-~L ~ ,WWSED FtS'~-3Z -t,#W ~ 4 44 0 'I H F 4 i~4o.to.*&#xa3;H o.H~~H -'2 -I.-~ -2 i~I-l ,7 , I-t SIAn tO r.7 410 ,~0'"4 .7A A tr~q a AEZAAt sc&r.- 7KWK E~4I III j~ ~fu-'* '&#xa3; A7AtMA S~ ta'AAdtJ CflvOnr&~~cAr~I-&#xfd;_U 7--I r WI2A.E&#xfd;lI -I _=1 =I.CtNE2AL A'OTfJ Ai'7W1(T &#xa3;tOM~ 'I LIHC '2 ,'~ &#xb6;i I2~4 fAAH~'5.' -In An tat.. 2 4.4flO44u-arIzct
-at,-,~ s'.' ova. ASAK at 'H Wan., tat ACSMC 0* ALa ct* .OH '2 5-,..W1t
* 44,4w jD.~.rA,4.CoK( ~0O A&#xa3;0 toot Ati aaa OW7IS 2*7*a? 'H st oar,'- ats,.W .~AS Is aun... .....I 1[-1 'I. -2 3 8... 7 i 1 " 5* I____________________________________________________________________
-- ---~---~-----~---~-.-
-----------
*--~-- -- A H A H~~~dwui --~0C~ -I, F -~.#A; 4.~C 5*1. -~ ---3 N Ir J a 1 --.1- a 30,~= J*~mii~~~ -j -~ ____ ____ _____CfDVAL/UC S)Z'~A4 ~4~fA' MV&'ZF CeflAW:-.flC -r ann e~na MCCC 'rr..-n.---I --, flOw 3,3.0, CC 7~0 004710~ Cr4 PC3,3-O, AC 3,600 #4! C. A' iCC 47 ,Ow$ r.iwSa~ ~44iC --*. ~ it3i5C4?EOMVAOMO-
-H-?0CL. ., -a'--,=- AC-,n..A,, -~ ~ , e~-4 2Ww'0'C7'Y'-S5a
,0-~ o~an~O- -4 .3 40050 a,04C ACACCC WSTdWfl "' ICC 00CC 0050 9.EWSA 3.-, SIw&AC*. 40 ~ '0*0 w~- -A2y 7v ve3sfL7.-Al Sr SSEM --_-- --_ 5rThP'Z I4ACY1VNN qip -- __,44ZC 00 w~ 0*'S -C3~~(CCA xe wUk v 4 I 4iT00C4440 A6, W- .V 0axx &#xfd;$.-g 0 JAOoiaC~'-~""~--n~-I0-~---.-
-,WAC ra I. -'a ..a ---------.--
---- --------------
--------*44C0_~-'
S. ---- -C--' -_G6A~eA1 A~7t.Y I OM~L OA~'1 ~ 340C~ ~ -- ~ -- ~ -.W*S, 'a 44004.0 ',a~dqg.wWwsr tea & .flfl MV. St *610 -.~ --A 3,i 0061t &#xa3;00 ~ *0 nnfO WI *W~V T 0033, ,0yS
-, ,A.OS C M~'1ZLE ~TAILS St? .~ A-~t A * *45 --- ~ --*aen A.36 AS 0.0*' 00. --- -------. ...--44e0in(nn,.
----=-'- -- ---- -- --' -...-,m'----.--
-V,3,SSAAdttr' rio 54.0 MC MO 30080 OOwWZO wWTCw 40470' --- -.rr A4Ce-rr~3~rnaAr MCS~W 0,00.580 3.410 CC~*, 3005 1304 toOt MaAIC C!")E 232-938 S---- ---- -~ ~2A677ii~
-_0 I 7 ~ I- 5a. ---A------<'
-. '- -~ -~0 -~ 4 4 z~ A IDE7IX__ I wo A 44M5004.4MM
: 4. O&#xfd; Ai* V05)...T,*c .mo as t WU A3ZA(4C0 WO 6LCA AV &, aw wc~,, wawlg ^,r%, w-4~~~~~VZ 4/4 a44 SCASMOI' f A45'A O",S 00&Amrv Alm.s -M-"
II II g A 2 9 A 3 4 3 I-2ve-EEZ-3 Jl Oft 00711. Wi-PLAA' LYI~~8OTTO~90 HEA12SEM1Z_1 0C~rej~,C Y ~ ~ 0~-s -A..-I-c 1 .000~7 E b0ct~-bO..
n~ -D_&#xfd;H---103fr TO M EAD II, 30,.70t 5.-I. -r-- S/AtM oror , ~e.-.5~,.- .-9--DETAIL Do-,)a'30100 ~WIMO WflW 3'AON P D D I WELD AVOL O('P .C~) NOE3 43-..-. .. -~710,0. --ae --o 0CIAO ' rCA W l See a.-r~~~~o 0 ('.7 -I DET~~ZY7AIL C r-,. -.0.s.*,4urr.
39),nsev A ------ ------- ...-- .. ~ 5-36 S"O~qt -.--*~. -- ---JC41ret.76- ----~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
f --- ----j S~J#4~T .____ --7zz SEC A- -~&&#xfd;-jA '3 89 sea1f 0000~~~~~~~~W DOMMSLVfa
'00 Now SW_3 ~f 0 HWS 0 a s --~- ---__________
a ~2'a Ra A 2- -ca~ -Arpc.- OfV .M Vt 8 I-.! .....I A4-:-I--7-r &#xfd;4 K a 7. 1 1,.q?I j177.am 7 n~. p 'Or-a~aflS q~ .. -... -____PC ~a54471~40 F' "tJ*0&#xa3;47-a CO'000 ~.fl,.0000 e~'Cr 0tEW OOTTR4SJV.40 .4~77 05>Z0~,0T &#xa3;407 ,u. r 05000 7'4~0 ..a 004MOS 0fl.g0'.AtS 0070051 t-TAa.t4.H,; -La&deg; G 1--0.~~i'a Ve4.A,'8")M0* w4 30 r.F71 j E-74B4E*4~ IN TOO 4V POMP PEMWS&#xa3; or, ~ iowan ozoiom ~ ..00OM5000 C rrtT~L...jzzTfv.zzLmxzz
......................... I;-[ .... = " F : II M8LE f t7A&#xfd;-fe ol0 I'-a,* t..NsO 8'I-iM a-..7S.-'.-al-lt--:7 Zr .s '77"oF' I~D..T. /*5 C-II I-4W ,-Wom___ , --I .-- -- : Z ...= ......-I " A.. ... .....T~ .Z 7 .S ' -- .. ..... ...- P..,.'-,.
._ -Cir.nT -' wr ..._ " 1-joI I..:, -- -I-- Io,. -.-.. .q ,- --" ' .& 8 T / l -' $ -.-- -. E232-781 ,..... ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~
! u -I= nAf.. ,toi -7 Ii..oiofl II______ I __________________
I~'I.0,50070 00 810 I 0.471 0047130471 MWCr0V70.00055S&#xa3;001 SVAWWWAMOM"A.4t
~AV.i/~ ~ ~~~~ --- 1 -, ...3... .s"I ..I.. .. ...--' .. .. I. ..... , ..
g"., -.. ..I II q 2 9 a I -9j6 Lla- ~31-13 K, K 1-___1~~w f- /g*4,5' ~ CA'J4113ACCA 0'40---. RI 14 14*4._w 6.1)--4E5~20 3'sw~I-414.4m1 4$A7A4$ A-_Fzre cor.n 7r3..3L-0.aD IISC1 aD. LE~**4*4.14.17 Is 014500. 1451/2 4 AE0A~...iOt9SZ 14*5 ZIS%
441 PCSA4'I5 1.1.3 1414044*4*IIW*A C DET -)ElF 77.3.IQ#qlww 47530.44575 335' 3 ..C 30E *4w3/04s5 c0'11Z i.--- 7777-_-___ 7_~SR7~W4t (L!IM~r.~A* ..^.1, i i ........
-I AC .413334$ 3 'eSSeC-,,4-0,14c 11;3534lA3PC 444.4 014111 .I I-~ ~ ~ 04EYlISA',rGe~fA~4 A~~
RAr A401 31475,4St " W&#xfd;0 Z s =ff.-*~e 55...A01104 IUGINNC 14. 145 404- 51414 I--vCSSEL Ofl33&#xb6; ArbTAC/A4LTS a.--~40A aaq14e'0~',sE4
!: I i I mm 1232-79--U I 5.... .. ~I....12 w F&#xfd;A I so S-Us7 F F , 45 I IL- ------ -- -_
-C~A, .ef-.-~~~~~~~ -- ---- ----- -- -* ~ -5 ~ -~ -.---A'/3Z~~~tn SCSD.
7--am-- Stfl'C ---O ----- , 2/-t- I e*s~~Vof~ g/
-,rAo NSA U 'sar~ll. ,in-t, U -1. ---- --
4 4 4+ +G 100-0 -- S 66A'&"AZ 2TESC~i'~AC L~ ~L~A/801 AW10 kfi &#xfd; l 1 ----2DAX AFlDBWWJVr L" A- -4" EAz2-a- 232-843 zwmI 2 .3 2 I -8 4 = -
R 7'l i 7~-z~ 4 i I ,I--H (4.2.7A....S-
--' '.- * , eo.,o.# 24# ___" I* -, : 002 1- ,.2 03 0 2 .I " TA I....... ..S~1102~Gf....a "04 --e It.A I ,,-[I G F F~n ~0(1.. 'GB4 tJPPO!T sKIRT R d0 TOM I-WBAD M5 5LALs. ral. &#xfd;Ld--------L.309 (N ' o 22o2.212---.
---------p FI N 6~- 2 7 L-~-4i -N/r0L,2,.E 7-.-(41'5:-,I ...............-j O:E I5JPOPT 1;:' DIMIN ,-/233 M4220 ?A10 l A.t.. .. -_ -._ , -_&#xfd;PBA5 PLAT A5S-AH~; .L{~1... 'Nl~l'5. 0 (.1)4.504004 AS 540PM 71 Ve-w-.r(e -I I/N*CTION CO/LA' ASSr jir-I I 2A "" L J I- " L2_ W p--- -...5IOIJ D-D4~sI SCAlA S 'i-C SCALE --AL_2]25k-~ ~ t SIP IAm Al,000-:_&. i 9'r+ _d-D.._- __ -" " 5 "0 il:;: '=s -A .d"- -.,,..o'I 44.470CC1010 O 0905060103 0 PAAI Srs A -.S # , ., ---* 0 CAOrT .i3'r40- '"F:: IT~,/
-I t SS. W IITM , 1cf I U SLOW U T &#xfd; I4r 1 :T" A&F-aLY SCAL. -O-,
'NE- AL NorTmO CONTPAC. .. .. -D06' P-F-. D' "DWG 3 PI R cWG. o---o--oI
... '04', -" "1G-_____-- VE.SEL ..... iT ..=*~ 22iZ A- A5Y AND OGTAiL5 Sam 123 2- 861i V U ELEV. 745.25" ELEV. 723.38" SHELL RING 5 ELEV. 589.0" NOTES, I -ALL M.EWS ARE, LOKING AT VESSEL FROM OUTSIDE.2 -A-SENSOR IDENTIFICATIONS.
rca t H0sC1IG4 em UKow.NOT FRc K9M0. C0tIC"MXM.
OR 01ME SWM1-Q0A=~Nm LASALLE COUNTY STATION UNIT 1 INSERVMCE INSPECTION RPV WELD & SENSOR LAYOUT 1, A am, SHOW 70P HEADO WaDS, CLAD PATCHES, STUO LOCATOL NOZZLES (N7. NO, NIB) AND nlANU TOP HEAD WELD DESIGNATIONS FOR UNIT fl VESSEL.ME-rnoWi l tamuitmme.mva-onu.am am I.WM SALLE LASAU.E CaTu STATlON SNow -r--- --"ENGNEERNG UNIT 1__ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _MAP TOP VESSE HEAD sGL10A I_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _I__ _ ___EM 900L-130-is
-3~. *1 w lalli8 BOTTOM VESSEL HEAD WELD DESIGNATIONS FORUt .3 m m nmmm m w-m a.in am I Now= mum- SALLE I LASALLE Cmmy STATm A_____ _____ New_ _ UNIT 1_________
_ _ISERACE PISPECTN IWAI.L WiO.MA____ __ BOTTOM VESSE 9CL10 SYSTEM HEAD ASSEMBLY i~-E- rA TE_______________
_____________
_r_ ME T I 6*,0-1I-PUMP LOCATION F-9 REF. INSPEClION CHECKLIST IHP-PU W %mUS IU mT ,m m- mm~m m 1.mA "m ELEV. 673'NoIhmNEERING UT I_____ .I!SELICE SISPECTION
_ _No MJAP HP PUM ASSEMBLY ISI-GEL-1049A m )ST-Mm , ZHT W I 0901-130'41I PUMP LOCATION B-14 REF. INSPECTION CHECICUST LP-PU 1W W oomo= a -M vomnm-._____ ____ -iL -SALL CouNTYSTATIN m__ _NEE__N ___I___ NSPEC_ _ .s NG.EN MAP LP PUMP ASSEMB.Y IS1-EL-1050 SYSTEM I I DUT or COO L PUMP LOCATION IA G-14 Is C-9 iC 1-10 ELEV. 673'REF. INSPECTION CHECKUSTS IRH-PU-IA RH-PU-1I RH-PU-IC-I m-in rim -i -w ,-il .lnL"l -l N wa 1H."&#xfd;
* _-- =" SALLE LASALLE CouNY STAI tON,.._I_ I ___]E__ ENGINEERING UNIT 1 MAP R PUMP ASSEMBY ISI-GEL-1003 SYSTEM _____IA A B C 0 NMT A. .L C. 0 ARE EQUALLY SPACED (W". 90. 1W. 2717 NO1TE LOCA7lON HXIA 0 H A 145 HX1B 0 S & 10WATER INLET UEREICE WAlER OUTLET LASAULE COUNlY STAllON INSERIVIE INSPECI1ON IRH-HX1A, 10 RHR HEAT EXCHANGERS COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 Page 20 of 22 December, 1993 ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT: .ASA(It- /I- PAGE: / OF PROCEDURE:
NDT REV. DATA SHEET NO.: /30 DATE: :-10-fr CALIBRATION SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: C-C) _3 ANGLE BEAM: axial C-03 5- circ. C_-C7_3_,_
_COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: _ '_ WELD#: 6EL -I o -A& WELD TYPE: T" >PIPE SIZE: 611 THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
V. 75' MATERIAL:
0-5 COMPONENT TEMPERATURE:
'F -/6V 7A 3 SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: w* ./57 ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: .f 6 0.8id3 COUPLANT/BATCH #: LL.rArtL 3 ' ot 4 Q ANGLE BEAM CIRC.: -e6.2oJ1 EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam >/ \ 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow > ><3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow 4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW 5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW ><L 6) Straight Beam of Weld ><0 W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal A//A P/A /A UP STRM WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS'S* ~A PJ al R -(I-CcT S IQ% -30% XbRLL PART.AL COVJ6r.A66-C) N ol SC hv 'tue 1-ro LP-OotoPi r L ATliho iJ. L-) _D.srAoj0( p f .f Rva62o 7 A& LQ&Lb*St- A tj 't 'IR~f ltCTS 'g* ACt4WhOt(.
PRV1" vuL Y' Reo J 61 OIL_ Z'J 1> 'CAT oor-4 o'956Ryep, -Augwago%
8ecygTAA6L LtjvL EXAMINER:
LEVEL: DATE: 9- /REVIEWER:/
LEVEL: JLLL- DATE: OTHER-: 6? LEVEL: ZRT DATE:______
STATION: c~.J ~DATE:______
ANI I: -.. DATE:
GE Nuclear Energy Top Head to Flange Weld, GEL-1009- AG. (0&deg; to 1800)Due to the Flange configuration the following coverage was achieved.00 450 60 'Exam area 78.5% 97.4%78.5%78.5%100.0%46.6%96.0%78.5%78.5%100.0%26.5%Base Material CW, Circ scans CCW, Circ scans Ax Up Ax On 466% 26.5% Ax Dn 78.5% 80.2% 75.9% Totals Composite coverage = 78.2% due to the Flange.Also, 166" of weld was limited to a 'W' of 5.5" due to OD machining.
These areas are 32" at weld DM, 97" at weld DQ and 37" at weld DR. This limitation of 166" resulted in an additional 6.3% of the required volume not examined.Total coverage achieved = 71.9%Scale: Half REPORT NO.: GE REVIEWED BY LEVEL DATE UTILITY REVIEW DATE SMAD REVIEW  96 O PAGE -_ F _fO&#xfd; &#xfd;4= %*-&#xfd;. .
COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 Page 20 of 22 December, 1993 ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
LAS*1k,5 /i " *. PAGE: / OF /PROCEDURE:
NDT- C3O REV. _DATA SHEET NO.: -131 DATE: /A -TE f CALIBRATION SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: ANGLE BEAM: axial C-c36 circ. COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: RV WELD 0: C, ( -A WELD TYPE: -rH PIPE SIZE: A/16 THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
75" MATERIAL:
CS COMPONENT TEMPERATURE:
&deg;f '/!5 9 783 , SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: IV ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: ___-_ _.__J_COUPLANT/BATCH #: LuLTIF C C, 0 cl t ANGLE BEAM CIRC.: 0-c EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam VI ,V/A/ \ 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow 3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow A, 4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW ., 5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW o-F L 6) Straight Beam of Weld M IA/I _0 W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal A A//IA,/ IV /h-UP STRM WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS'-;- A OA4 d 6 ?.f IC-TS Iel % rO~oX I-oL PART-#AL Co\16- A&6 0,.J SCA,, "b , o FL ,,pj&6 C 0r,4 C-i...-u kA -r t 0 J, 3D ~5 T-AN 'j cc- wT~- L r A&LJL EXAMINER:- 0 LEVEL: _ _ DATE: ________REVIEWER:
LEVEL:__________
DATE:_______
OTHER:- LEVEL:DATE:
STATIONf&#xfd; C-.DAE ANI I:__________________
DATE: tS NDT-B-I Revision 6 December, 1993 Page 43 of 44 FORM NDT-B-l-F1 MAGNETIC PARTICLE EXAMINATION DATA SHEET DATE 2-/0 -76 STATION & UNIT LaSalleUnitI DATA SHEET # 1--/3_EXAMINER E. T r T e-, LEVEL W7 SYSTEM RPV coMPoNENT GEL-1009-AG SECTION XI EDITION & ADDENDA 1989 Edition, No Addenda CODE CLASS I SECTION XI CATEGORY B-A ACCEPTANCE STD. IWB-3510.3 PROCEDURE
# & REVISION NDT-B-I Rev. 6 SKETCH SHEET USED: YES NO X COMM3ENTS:
Configuration:
THD &#xa3;-X ,fr/u i J c9-/ 0' &-t-L. L-/OQY-Ag MAGNETIC PARTICLE EXAM: Manufacturer Model/Type S/N Yoke ParKer ujuu* PAA -AC HTv- t Particles Magnaflux 3 c 3 A 0 145 Black Light N/A N/A NIA B.L.M. Readings N/A B.L.M. Time Checks Initial NIA Final EXAM RESULTS ACCEPT X REJECT REVIEWED BY: EXAMINER:
: i. LEVEL: REVIEWER:
LEVEL: OTHER: .L LEVEL: ______33TATION:
t Current AC X DC Color A'ED NIA DATE: DATE: DATE: DATE: DATE: 2-ID- ?b 37.0 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 Page 20 of 22 December, 1993 ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT: '/ PAGE: / OF PROCEDURE:
NDT- C-30 REV. Z. DATA SHEET NO.: _ _- ___ DATE: 12_-_CALIBRATION SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: (f_-_040 ANGLE BEAM: axial C-'1/2/l circ. (f_-_/COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: _ /_______WELD S/ML /O , WELD TYPE: 7W,,!:>PIPE SIZE: _ ____THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
4, MATERIAL:
C COMPONENT TEMPERATURE:
d.6.1 Po: #.5 -' 77?3.(SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: :Pc. A/ 7-.0 /SANGLE BEAM AXIAL: Al -le" COUPLANTI//&#xa3; -Z COPATBATCH.
ANGLE BEAM CIRC.:_______
EXAMINATION SCANS-Performed Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam / \ 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow 3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow 4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW 5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW V F L 6) Straight Beam of Weld 0 W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal ^1 1S/4 UP STRM WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS EXAMINER:
LEVEL: -DATE: _2 __2 -9_ _REVIEWER: i 4 LEVEL: _-Z-7 DATE:__________
OTHER: LEVEL:_____
DATE:" / -o STATION.&#xfd;&#xfd; DATE:___________
ANI I: k~ ~ DATE: 3-~~)-~
GE Nuclear Energy Typical for welds, GEL-1009-DM, Data Sheet 96-146 & 147 and GEL-1009-DP Data Sheet 96-150 & 151 Due to the welded lifting lugs an area 6.5" x 24" was unavailable for inspection.
Thisarea represents 35% of the required examination volume, however some coverage was obtained with the axial scans from the clockwise and counter clockwise side of the weld.Composite coverage achieved = 77.2%Weld # AL-`Area of Limitation due to Welded Lug I I 24" z I 6.5"/I 6.5" I A1 KI ,*\ I I.5" WELD 3 Weld # AG I REPORT NO.: GE REVIEWED BY LEVEL DATE I MI rrv POIn_r , &#xfd;'DATE_? /1-y/14 DATE 96-146 PAGE, 2 OF: 2L II Tml lbWW SMAD RQEWR LEVEL~~~ 40:4 1USA EIWDT fi~ 'Pb.f~7 Y&#xfd;- L) 7g ,OMU MWRE &
COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 Page 20 of 22 December, 1993 ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA S NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
/.9sq zz // PAGE: J OF PROCEDURE:
NDT-&#xfd;_:30 REV. 2 DATA SHEET NO.: I_ //7 DATE: .2-/2-74 CALIBRATION SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: 101_4_ ANGLE BEAM: axial _ -_ _ __z circ. _ _____COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: _____ ___WELD 0: G~-/O -/>" WELD TYPE: ________PIPE SIZE: __/_ THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
447s" MATERIAL:
e COMPONENT TEMPERATURE:
& " 'z //15-472 3 SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: %/4 ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: 0 COUPLANT/
BN R ___,______
BATCH 0: //1 ANGLE BEo AM C1C.EXAMINATION SCANS-'erformed Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam/ I\ 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow , 3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow -__4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW .7 5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW .7 F L 6) Straight Beam of Weld 0 W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal V -/ j UP STRM WELD. DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS i~' c~4 c/ &s 73 ,, , A ;. ,,r EXAMINER: $*1 2i.1 .-- LEVEL: Z DATE:__________
REVIEWER:.
LEVEL:- _77 DATE: 2-2 4 OTHER: LEVEL:______
DATE:_11;_________
STATION C. DA DATE: &#xfd; //o ANTI: DATE: 3 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 Page 20 of 22 December, 1993 ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
/3 ' c //PAGE: / OF PROCEDURE:
NDT-C-3  REV. Z DATA SHEET NO.: fe-/,C) DATE: .2 -/2-9 CALIBRATION SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: C-0 0 ANGLE BEAM: axial C-O"// circ. _-_ __/ _COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: _ _ _ _WELD #: W'E- -/O'7- ) ELD TYPE: 7__ -,'D PIPE SIZE: A,/4 -THICKNESS/SCHEDULE: " MATERIAL:
_COMPONENT TEMPERATURE:
"- 04 # XT-477-"3 SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: 7 .i' ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: Ia. 4 c/(COUPLANT/
1 BATCH 0: 117AW eI &#xfd; ANGLE BEAM CIRC.:'A EXAMINATION SCANS"Pe romed Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam/I \ 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow /3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow /4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW 5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW V F L 6) Straight Beam of Weld b., 0 W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal ///9- f )/# ,//4 UP STRM WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS EX A M I NER:Re'I.
LEVEL:_ DATE:____/2_ REVIEWER:
EL AE OTHER: LEVEL: DATE: ~-/7 STATIO i 10 (. DATE: ?___________ANII: (~4j'V~"DATE:
S GE Nuclear Energy Typical for welds, GEL-1009-DM, Data Sheet 96-146 & 147 and GEL-1009-DP Data Sheet 96-150 & 151 Due to the welded lifting lugs an area 6.5" x 24" was unavailable for Inspection.
This-area represents 35% of the required examination volume, however some coverage was obtained with the axial scans from the clockwise and counter clockwise side of the weld.Composite coverage achieved = 77.2%.-w ___ .Weld # AL"'t 10" 24!'Area of Limitation due to Welded Lug 6.5" 34.5" Weld # AG m -GE REVIEWED BY czZ~ z'4~: LEVEL DATE DATE SMAD REVIEW REPORT NO.: S96.15a PAGE: 2 (oF 2 DATE UTILITY REVIEW'4 qlL &#xfd;K 0 -&#xfd; _'- _( 0--
COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 Page 20 of 22 December, 1993 I I I ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
/ 4 Y4/ -PAGE: _ OF /PROCEDURE:
NDT-e-30 REV. 2- DATA SHEET NO.: 1 5 /5-' DATE: .2-/Z-9tC CALIBRATION SHEET NO. (8)ST. SEAM: __ _ _ANGLE BEAM: axial _ -_____ circ. __________-
COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: PRPI WELD 0: 1-)/?7- L) WELD TYPE: 7 PIPE SIZE: A/_/_. THICKNESS/SCHEDULE7
.1 "6 ' MATERIAL:
C5 COMPONENT TEMPERATURE:
.4 0Fr .C /4 .3 SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT SEAM: 44'ANGLE B3EAM AXIAL: d3. L)COUPLANT/, -., I BATCH #:'.~- ~ANGLE BEAM CIRC.: ~ .'dEXANINALTION SCANS EOPerfozrme Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam/ I\ 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow .3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow 4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW 5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW F L 6) Straight Beam of Weld 0 W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal a a- I UP STRM WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS EXAMINER:
LEVEL: 7 DATE: 1-/2-94.REVIEWER:
LEVEL: -777- DATE: -i-/ .OTHER: 74 ~ 6 L d (LEVEL: Z DATE:_____
STATIOq!.
6 DATE: ANII: -DATE: 3- 9.
COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 Page 20 of 22 December, 1993 ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
!ASA/iE /1 PAGE: / OF PROCEDURE:
NDT-C q REV. 2 DATA SHEET NO.: _ -_ _ DATE: 2- Z/- %CALIBRATION SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: ( -Q 73 ANGLE BEAM: axial __ -_______ circ. __-______/
COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: -A tPV WELD #-: LCS--'4f" WELD TYPE:FANrr r,0 PIPE SIZE: N.IA THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
-7. .. MATERIAL:
CS COMPONENT TEMPERATURE:
8' f i .15fOO7 SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: , f_2.aWW8 ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: ir 5-7. y COUPLANTT
-] ANGLE BEAM CIRC.: ." ,/ O'R EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam V V/I\ 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow v v 3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow -4 N 4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW X4 5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW v/L 6) Straight Beam of Weld v ....0 W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal v/1 AV/A I/A UP STRM WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS'i-7CAAI Wei "'FLFC7= JOt A144P No ELtrAM 7c"4 " -0.. /Off*- Z,/0' 009 To EME -LEVEL: DATE: 2 L.2 REVIEWER:
LEVEL: DATE: 4 -,94 OTHERLEVEL:
DATE:_ _ _S TATION: 6. DATE:____________
LANII: -h .z DATE: '.4)
GE Nuclear Energy Vessel to Flange Weld, GEL-1009-AF.
Exam performed for 360&deg;Due to the Flange configuration the following coverage was achieved.0&deg; 450 600 Exam area 54.5% 75.0% 65.4% Base Material 54.5% 54.5% CW Circ. scans 54.5% 54.5% CCW Circ. scans 100.0% 100I0% Ax Down o1no/. 0f1n. Av fin.5% 56.8% U!9%Total Composite coverage = 55.4%/INz I Scale: Half REPORT NO.: WWz&--- -zzz:- J-27--d)4 GE REVIEWED BY LEVEL DATE DATE SVM REVIEW DATE UTILITY REVIEW PAGE:-- 2 OF: 2 GE~~~~~~~
~16 ,EIEE kBY LEE DAT ,TLT REiE SMAD&#xfd;Rr aEIWDT AE COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 Page 20 of 22 December, 1993 ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA sHET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
LAAI5 /A I.... PAGE: / OF PROCEDURE:
NDT- fQ REV. DATA SHEET NO.: 19_-_.2_"__l DATE: .-11-9a CALIBRATION SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: A/I ANGLE BEAM: axial C) ?5 circ. -c7-COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: 9PV WELD 0: L-CS---AF WELD TYPE: _ __e-_ _ /PIPE SIZE: AKIA THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
7 MATERIAL:
C S COMPONENT TEMPERATURE: ) 0 15 5007 (SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: IV/A ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: 7 -i COUPLANT/
* ' 3 ,s BOPANTCH0
_tL1RAGrft-tI2' "A .2 ANGLE BEAM CIRC.: ~EXAMINATION SCAMS Performed Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam.' //\ 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow 3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow A/ /a 4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW A A 5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW V F L 6) Straight Beam of Weld -NIA 0 W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal A1/1A g// A//A UP STRM WELD ON STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS*5CAF4 R6 FL6CYS_ /06~A)t 6XAM' 26& ORM67\d r0: fO 6, AT-c io5 ' t~L .A& LcP, "r--1 3, F3Ro,-" LT- T-oe, EXAMINER:
LEVEL: ..LLL- DATE: 2/4 REVIEWER:-
LEVEL: -B- DATE: .? 7 OTHER: LEVEL: -. Z,. DATE:__ _____STATION: IDATE: 2i ANII: +,._..,;_-._,/
__DATE:
COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 Page 20 of 22 December, 199 ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
L-ASALL_-
/I PAGE: OF PROCEDURE:
NDT- C_-._7, REV. .DATA SHEET NO.: 96-/5a DATE: CALIBRATION SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: _ _-_ ANGLE BEAM: axial W4 q _ circ. C- L414 COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: ARR WELD o: LCS-I- MIR WELD TYPE: A-'Sh PIPE SIZE: Aq" THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
4,.J""MATERIAL: (LS COMPONENT TEMPERATURE:
:80 SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: (3,0)4B COUPLANT/BATCH : ULTPA L E L.-/91wa,.
ANGLE BEAM CIRC.: .45 od EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam --_..._/ \ 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow -3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow -4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW .7' ____5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW FL 6) Straight Beam of Weld 0 W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal / '/A /UP STRM WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS?Ea P-CM,4/" E-1J) 4_: 2 0  S A/ta e-XAM PtcUPOMEIJ&#xfd; OW\ )4O2Z-Lf -SIl(e oF: IA.39L6 LL bU 7TC, )4Xf Cc43PL(Ak1-zoM.
AU &#xfd;- A' /ao 75-~ ?-4 .2 -W P,~,. 7&#xfd; 1 A, le 2IeW 7~EXAMINER: ,LEVEL: DATE: --REVIEWER:
LEVEL: / DATE:____________
OTHER: LEVEL: DATE: _3_________
'STATION:
6DATE :_ANII: DATE GE Nuclear Energy Typical for Welds LCS-1-NiA, Data Sheets 96-152 & 153 and LCS-1-NIB, Data Sheets 96-154 & 155.Due to the configuration of the nozzle no exams were performed from the nozzle side. This limits the coverage achieved to: 0&deg; = 56.25%450 = 60.75%60&deg; = 58.81%Coverage due to nozzle = 58.6%Weld LCS-1-NIA was also limited at 180&deg; due to a 3.25" thermocouple located 2.5" from weld toe. This results In an additional
.66% coverage not achieved.Total composite coverage for LCS-1-NIA
= 57.94%N I REPORT NO.: GE REVIEWED BY LEVEL DATE UTILITY REVIEWDATE SMAD REVIEW DATE-9U-52-PAGE: --OF 2 A , I #- '-- I I- -" -*I'-' " ---
COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 Page 20 of 22 December, 1993 ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
Zf 1,91-t Lt/ PAGE: ( OF /PROCEDURE:
NDT- REV. 7- DATA SHEET NO.: -/53 DATE: CALIBRATION SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: _ _/_ _ ANGLE BEAM:
axial C- circ. _ -___ _-COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: 114 WELD #: ICS-/- A/IA WELD TYPE: N-S PIPE SIZE: 2 'l 1 THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
e.q5" MATERIAL:
C 5 COMPONENT TEMPERATURE:
I SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: AAANGLE BEAM AXIAL: COUPLANT/BATCH 0: ItM -L7/ -r5325- ANGLE BEAM CIRC., .C/o d EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam V1/ J\ 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow V 3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow 7 4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW V/ , _5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW V V F L 6) Straight Beam of Weld V 0 W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal AI IV A AI A UP STRM WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS A/D 15 0105, 0 VA/ #VOZZ.AL 15,) 45~~~ 0U 'V' (4je t &07L4 Covla yaoi,''vc' e-6~9N , 0 6JFo?r-?zQV9 .OE 7Tb 3.25 *Pip~rL'A -rV&A ~co(A ipcs /Ocqrs&' z. 5')rkyAo" NJO roc Air- go"'EXAMINER:
ca_ l -LEVEL: .~ DATE:_______
REVIEWER:
Waec LEVEL:-~ DATE: 2-7 5e OHR DLEVEL: DATE: /2~':; Ayr-STATION 6DATE:______
ANII: DATE:.j3c COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 Page 20 of 22 December, ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
4A 5QLLL 1 PAGE: OF _PROCEDURE:
NDT- REV. DATA SHEET NO.: 96-)541 DATE: &#xfd;-jS-j CALIBRATION SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: c__q3 ANGLE BEAM: axial circ. C-0q4 COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: __ WELD #: LCS-1-AItA WELD TYPE: ,/-S PIPE SIZE: 2jj THICKNESS/SCHEDULE: MATERIAL: COMPONENT TEMPERATURE:
___ sq_SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: _ ._ ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: _ (o______dis COUPLANT/BATCH #: L.TZAG&e---.
:.2/ 9.53a5 ANGLE BEAM CIRC.: _ _,____EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam/ \ 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow /3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow VA 4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW 5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW 7 _F L 6) Straight Beam of Weld ___W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal As/A Ad/eq /UP STRM WELD DN STR]ADDITIONAL COMMENTS?P-EoLpEt E4PtYrM WadT 0 0 L I g4SOS NO1 fj~o PP~eFo(4flit)
OM A102-2--&
510t OP Ucfk1iS DLLI, TO PJOZZLE Co(.)F16LkATi M.EXAMI14ER:
2LEVEL:______
DATE:_______
REVIEWER:___
LEVEL:_ DATE: OTHER: LEVEL: DATE:__S T ATIO0N:A DATE:_______
ANII: DATE:
GE Nuclear Energy Typical for Welds LCS-1-N1A, Data Sheets 96-152 & 153 and LCS-1-NIB, Data Sheets 96-154 & 155.Due to the configuration of the nozzle no exams were performed from the nozzle side. This limits the coverage achieved to: 0 = 56.25%450 = 60.75%600 = 58.81%Total composite coverage = 58.6%k/REPORT NO.: GE REVIEWED BY LEVEL DATE UTILTY REVIEW;&#xfd;/eE- Y4, SMAD REVIEW DATE-96-i 54-PAGE:--2 OF I ANL, COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 Page 20 of 22 December, 199.ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
4A I.PLLAS /(L4ilT- PAGE: OF PROCEDURE:
NDT- REV. a DATA SHEET NO.: 76-/155 DATE: _-/_"____CALIBRATION SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: tv/A/ ANGLE BEAM: axial _-______circ.
(-0145 COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: IM WELD 0: LC5- I-AiIf WELD TYPE: A/-_ _ _PIPE SIZE: 2 THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
S'/5 MATERIAL: (l COMPONENT TEMPERATURE:
75&deg; /SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: AiA ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: 6-5 J'4 couPLANT/
AN 5 ,1bJ BATCH 0: ANGLE BEAM CIRC.: EXAMINATION SCANS, Performed Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam --2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow V/3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow -w 4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW V v 5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW '7 V FL 6) Straight Beam of Weld '7 0 W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal V/UP STRM WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS NO C1-2R opJ S)DE or-- w,-1-9 VVtE 7"0 EXAMINER:
_LEVEL:___
________DATE:
Z/5/7 REVIEWER: ,LEVEL DATE: , , ,, OTHER:- LEVEL: 7Z?" DATE:_ ____STATION KDATE:_______
ANI I: C )jlS1-\DATE:
Z COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 Page 20 of 22 December, 1993 ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
LASALL / 1 PAGE: I OF PROCEDURE:
NDT- REV. _ DATA SHEET NO.: _ --_16d DATE: _-__-__CALIBRATION SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: ANGLE BEAM:
axial -051 circ. C--051 COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: /WS ELD i: LCS -I- A3A WELD TYPE: /iS PIPE SIZE: .2(o THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
.MATERIAL:
CS COMPONENT TEMPERATURE: qa1 SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: Soqds ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: 5.COUPLANT/BATCH #: ULTUAGEL 9x53as ANGLE BEAM CIRC. _ _ __EXAMINATION SCANS -Performed Indications YES NO NO YES 1 ) Base Metal Straight Beam/ \ 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow -3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow 4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW` V __5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCWL 6) Straight Beam of Weld W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal V/ -V/ A 'VIA UP STRM WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 1M&SIcuS4-)
J MDLS rw Ab LL .i GIM -4LOU&J " ,. pC.c*.cRLF.
/.. -LS..)4o OZZILE~ SIM~ blP W1ELLS fci-yupjIKt bu To NCzzLL C~ICbA.'-GLp'Tier.-
_____LEVEL:
____ DATE:- 2-3-96 REVIEWER:__
LEVEL: _ DATE: /I .oLHER:-'7- " EVEL: DATE:______
STATION: ____ DATE: 9-Ye. -ANII: *~'--~,DATE:_____
SGE Nuclear Energy Typical for Welds: LCS-1-N3A, Data Sheets 96-162 & 163 LCS-1-N3B, Data Sheets 96-164 & 165 LCS-1-N3C, Data Sheets 96-166 & 167 LCS-1-N3D, Data Sheets 96-168 & 169 Due to the configuration of the nozzle no exams were performed from the nozzle side. This limits the coverage achieved to:.0&deg;=450 =600 =57.85%61.60%60.40%Total composite coverage = 59.95%/GE REVIEWED BY LEVEL DATE , -,- 1; &#xfd;-, / , e --) -DATE SMAD REVIEW DATE REPORT NO.: PAGE: 2 OF: 2 UTILITY REVIEW-.~FORM UT,02 REV. 8 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. UDT-C-30 Rev. 2 Page 20 of 22 December, 1993 ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SKE NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
I^ L4LL// PAGE: I OF /PROCEDURE:
NDT- C- 3_b REV. -Z DATA SHEET NO.: e -/.3 DATE: 2___/_- _CALIBRATION SHEET NO.(S)ST. A/l ANGLE DEAM: axial C 0,-- circ. _ -0_-._. _COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: MS WELD#: LCS-f- A3A WELD TYPE: N5 PIPE SIZE: 2 THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
7.0" MATERIAL:
C-5 COMPONENT TEMPERATURE:
YqI /Lj2 SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: IVA4 ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: COUPLANT//
BATCH #: " L rA L _f,' zr j ANGLE BEAM CIRC.: EXAMINATION SCANS Perforued Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam V/ \ 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow 3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow ., 4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW -__"_,/5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW V V _F L 6) Straight Beam of Weld _-0 W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal A., I V, ?VA UP STRM WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS A4?IsOvgrVeDx EXM Airi 60'S 1V0 A/Q5ZZ((5 Sjbo f o.Ae'-b ~'j u606 -10 A1-07Z(6' eCo11(4v1,24r~
EXAMINER:
' LEVEL: : DATE: " ;-REVIEWER:
LEVEL: z=.- DATE: -1 ?OTHER: 5 ) J #4tLEVEL:
________ DATE: .3 104 AF STAT ION: DATE: 9,4/ANII: ----------DATE: -z- -' f COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 Page 20 of 22 December, 1993 ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
L-RSALLU.-
I 1 PAGE: J OF PROCEDURE:
NDT- C.-3. REV. _ DATA SHEET NO.: 96- /6!] DATE: .--9, CALIBRATION SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: C-__SO ANGLE BEAM: axial C.-CSJ circ. C-CS COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: MS WELD #: LCS Ml? WELD TYPE: AJS PIPE SIZE: __(Ito THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
'.0" MATERIAL:
C S COMPONENT TEMPERATURE:
M40 *154 JI SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: _ _o COUPLANT/BATCH 1: JLTRAC XL -17, 5 ANGLE BEAM CIRC.: 50 EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam V\ 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow -3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow / */4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW V/5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW V /F*L 6) Straight Beam of Weld Ow 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal /V ^/1 ./1 A/UP STRH WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS WIZVEMED &#xa3;X~Arw, 1Airr1A O'L 4L Im'DcSJ~TIaj Cl0a1EI&#xfd;Q JAI M10 WAPLL Rtericpi M- C-Qu-3 i OpQALf.. L90eULLS.A/fJAJO22.ta -Si OF: LI~m. FLr~m_ b~f -Th 1.Jc2ZLL oF&..T EXAMINER:
.,LEVEL: -DATE:_______
REVIEWER:
LEVEL: j DATE: 4,2 -/9 " OTHER: e LEVEL: DATE: ./3-4 '/'STATION: -; DATE:_ ___ANII: --DATE:
oGE Nuclear Energy Typical for Welds: LCS-1-N3A, Data Sheets 96-162 & 163 LCS-I-N3B, Data Sheets 96-164 & 165 LCS-1-N3C, Data Sheets 96-166 & 167 LCS-1-N3D, Data Sheets 96-168 & 169 Due to the configuration of the nozzle no exams were performed from the nozzle side. This limits the coverage achieved to: 00 = 57.85%450 = 61.60%60&deg; = 60.40%Total composite coverage = 59.95%K IXz 22w? 2.2Y ee Ae GE REVIEWED BY LEVEL DATE ,UTILITY REVIEW DATE SMAD EVIEWDATE REPORT NO.: PAGE: 2 OF: 2 UliLITY~~OR REVIE REV. SMDRVIWDT COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 Page 20 of 22 December, 1993 ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SKEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
Li SItltl/- PAGE: ( OF /PROCEDURE:
NDT- -__o REV. 2- DATA SHEET NO.: 9_i'_ __/6 DATE: 2-/3-7 CALIBRATION SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: A/k ANGLE BEAM: axial Cf-0-2 circ. _ __f -_COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: M S WELD 0: LC 5- I-bA36 WELD TYPE: A)PIPE SIZE: 2 6 THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
T0 MATERIAL:
CS COMPONENT TEMPERATURE:
yq9 IS/yZ)SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: At'4 ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: (3 I BATCH 0: iii jr/bd(. ZL T5 z5 ANGLE BEAM CIRC.: EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam/ \ 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow 3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow 4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW /5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW V1 V/F L 6) Straight Beam of Weld V 0 W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal UP STRM WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 08 gfVEp /V IN fID L41LL AKf-q4 8t%RFCorV1%15Le Lc-%JC-LS Afo Ao1zLz5"S1"6, of 5A"1,,jeA bug' -m yozzC. Co, v"1j"u1 ,o,1.EXAMINER:
LEVEL:_ _ DATE: 2" 3-qc(, REVIEWER:
LEVEL: .DATE: ______-______
OTHER:/ Z/-%7 & ' LEVEL:_ _ DATE:
STATION: DATE: c/?i ANII: -===- DATE: -.- '
COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 Page 20 of 22 December, 1993 ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
L1SALU J 1 PAGE: 1 OF PROCEDURE:
NDT- C-__ REV. _. DATA SHEET NO.: q6_16- /DATE: -1 /q-96 CALIBRATION SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: C- OS3 ANGLE BEAM:
axial Cd0514 circ. C-os(COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: /)7s WELD #: C WELD TYPE: )S PIPE SIZE: _26 THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
7.0 I MATERIAL:
CS COMPONENT TEMPERATURE:
9qF-1qqA SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: 6p. ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: 56. S COUPLANT/
AC .: 5 9-0 BATCH #: (JLTiZAGELP
_, S3_ ANGLE BEAM CIRC.: 59,o EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam Y N O/ \ 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow -3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow 4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW 5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW V/1 F L 6) Straight Beam of Weld V., 0 W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal / .VA/ I A'/ I /I UP STRM WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS OMoEE EXAM~I W3TRk LL 4 4'A10' A101zL& SIDE 6FLaELC OF ftyXM LM OLF TO oA1Q-7Lq_
CaGfIE-%~AL-rtQ0-'~
EXAMINER:
LEVEL: -DATE:________
OTHER: LEVEL:.. DATE: OTE:A)LEVEL:
DATE:_ _____STATION -- DATE: ______/____
ANII: =:: " DATE: &#xfd;&#xfd;- ! -1 (
SGE Nuclear Energy Typical for Welds: LCS-1-N3A, Data Sheets 96-162 & 163 LCS-1-N3B, Data Sheets 96-164 & 165, LCS-1-N3C, Data Sheets 96-166 & 167 LCS-1-N3D, Data Sheets 96-168 & 169 Due to the configuration of the nozzle no exams were performed from the nozzle side. This limits the coverage achieved to: 00 = 57.85%450 = 61.60%600 = 60.40%Total composite coverage = 59.95%REPORT NO.: GE REVIEWED BY LEVEL DATE UTILIY REVIEW DATE SMAD REVIEW DATE 2 OF: 2 PAGE: FORMUTrYR1v, COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 Page 20 of 22 December, 1993 ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET 1 DT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
L N LyLLE J PAGE: / OF /PROCEDURE:
NDT-C-30_
REV. 2. DATA SHEET NO.: __ -_/ _7 DATE: 2-/&#xa5;" 1 C.CALIBRATION SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: A, ANGLE BEAM: axial C 0-, circ. C- -COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: P1 5 WELD #: LCS"- bAl/3 C WELD TYPE: NS PIPE SIZE: _____, THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
7.0" MATERIAL:
C5 COMPONENT TEMPERATURE: l  SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: t ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: C/X BATCH N: i)rA 4 Q ;7_ 2 -ANGLE BEAM CIRC.: ,4 EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indications YES No no YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam/ \ 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow 3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow Ve 4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW V, 5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW V L 6) Straight Beam of Weld W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal V/ N% il k .r'UP STEM WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS epA-A, d )c 4 s t XA-kW %4( *s ,goG*7-rJ0F4S COX&~VEJD IA' M1D PALL. Veql*PiJ f3etta.. MECOMDASLLI E V !-L S A/C mtoz~zLC jit)6 ooc' Wee- d~4?A6 buc5 -ro A/ozzcC r ~ -C~e4-1~EXAMINER:
LEVEL:. DATE: REVIEWER:
LEVEL:____
__ DATE: .2.-'-OTHER: c2 &#xfd;4 LEVEL: 7?DATE: /6'STATION: 2 DATE: ANII: ---iL. DATE:
COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 Page 20 of 22 December, 1993 ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
LAS-- A .) 2. PAGE: J OF PROCEDURE:
NDT- REV. DATA SHEET NO.: C1__-/6S _ DATE: _ _lq_____CALIBRATION SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: C- oS3 ANGLE BEAM: axial C- S'- circ. C..- 06 COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: MS WELD #: LCS -I- ' .90 WELD TYPE: M AS PIPE SIZE: ' THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
1O " MATERIAL:
CS COMPONENT TEMPERATURE:
po *LS 6 J SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: .g ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: 56.COUPLANT/BATCH #: ULTRA &.&t 7r( S13[-Jf ANGLE BEAM CIRC.: 6 EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam/ \ 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow 3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow 4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW 5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW ._L 6) Straight Beam of Weld _0 W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal A7 A/ UP STRM WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTSf--A 66L t, 4S6_jAIbICATIGAMS n&tcjP~f,0t 1.1 Mej LA.AL-L 9fC.-o. "Bo.E.. '&#xfd;EC btA&_L LAe cLtfS.)A40 ")E2L2O F y_&P 141j&#xfd; Q.LLO 1-6 Mc5ZZL~ cNft~EXAMINER:
L, LEVEL: 1r_ DATE: Z--91 REVIEWER:
..LEVEL:____
DATE: _ _OTE:LEVEL:
DATE:_______
STATIO(&#xfd;:&#xfd;
&#xfd;DATE:.ANI I: --DATE:
S GE Nuclear Energy Typical for Welds: LCS-1-N3A, Data Sheets 96-162 & 163 LCS-I-N36, Data Sheets 96-164 & 165 LCS-1-N3C, Data Sheets 96-166 & 167 LCS-1-N3D, Data Sheets 96-168 & 169 Due to the configuration of the nozzle no exams were performed from the nozzle side. This limits the coverage achieved to: 0&deg; = 57.85%450 = 61.60%600 = 60A0%Total composite coverage = 59.95%N GE REVIEWED BY LEVEL DATE<-&#xfd;Xe/&#xfd; d DATE SMAD REVIEW DATE REPORT NO.: 2 OF: 2 PAGE: UTILITY REVIEW UllUlY REVIEW DATE COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 Page 20 of 22 December, 1993 ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET N=-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
A-ASA/F 1 / Z PAGE: OF PROCEDURE:
NDT- _ E V. DATA SHEET O./ DATE: ____- __CALIBRATION SHEET NO.(S)ST. SEAM: IVA ANGLE BEAM: axial C- 0 &#xa3;-J circ. COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: A7] _ WELD #: -C5-f-AJ-3D WELD TYPE: A/ S PIPE SIZE: :2 THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
: 7. 0 MATERIAL:
C 5 COMPONENT TEMPERATURE: -./ I SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: ZA4 ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: COUPLANT/B3ATCH 0: (LP/.L ANGLE BEAM CIRC.: _______EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam/ \ 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow 3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow > '4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW ><5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW F L 6) Straight Beam of Weld 0W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal A/AIA1A Al/A UP STRM WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS PFLd'r-21yr, eXANi W~r 60*4 s//glc~rjof4&
IN)f M ArB WALL. A'ee~ror 4  OffL v fic-bvfVLE LI-iVff-L.
Alo AI~7?L~ ~ ~ t~~C L~iQL1l ~TtAii IA/Ic~JA A b~ -Th A(Oz7/6 C~Aljc~a U2AT~av.A10 A1e07_7Zj5
_"&#xfd;jA15 eioc tueg-b 151,4-&#xfd;IA1157.6 bQ9 -m ovo r-e-e Cootlz-16vg4nqw&#xfd; EXAMINER:
LEVEL: -.Z'7 DATE: Z-/L- 71-REVIEWER:
LEVEL:" DATE: 7 D9T OTER ;&#xfd; _LEVEL: DATE: STATION:6&#xfd;&#xfd;
&#xfd;..-E DATE:.ANII: .~Q-2 -- -DATE: -
ComEd Procedure No. NDT-C-2 Rev. 22 Page 19 of 20 September, 199 ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHE NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
L-If//e 1/2 PAGE / OF 2-P : PROCEDURE:
NUT- C-2. REV. 5~DATA S EET NO.: ____2___ DATE: -? 4 CALIBRATION SHEET NO. (S) 2 0 ST. BEAM: __/_/_ _ ANGLE BEAM: axial ___-_______
circ. __-______COMPONENT INSPECT SYSTEM: #//l' WELD #t:/,/-A'i-_
WELD TYPE: / --PIPE SIZE: R-" THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
],/ MATERIAL:
C-5 COMPONENT TEMPERATURE:
l4ao.L I SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETZINGS STRAIGHT BEAMt _ _// ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: -,o. L d COUPLANT/BATCH #: l7e-,VA _ -/ 9J-p ANGLE BEAM CIRC.: o.. d EZAMINATION SCAkNS-- Performed Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam I/ \ 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow 3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow 4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW s) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW L 6) Straight Beam of Weld W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal , /. .- " UP STRM WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS EXAMINER:
LEVEL: DATE: ;7--17-9a REVIEWER:
LEVEL:--, DATE: _-I?-i'-OTHER: LEVEL: ~DATE:.STATION __6DATE: 47f ANII: ---- DATE: S1 WALL THICKNESS SITE: LaSalle Unit I REPORT NO.-GE Nuclear Energy PROFILE SHEET PROJECT: LIR07 '2 2 SYSTEM: #13 COMPONENT ID q //Ie -. i POSITION 0. 90` 180" 270' j< Is- .1 1.5 -> 1 CROWN HEIGHT:Ee-'A 2 4 [ii'II 2 CROWN WIDTH:____r-__________.____
/ NOM DIAMETER-
'4 _E L D -_WELD LENGTH:___________
FLOW RH-HXIB-1 1. Due to the configuration of the nozzle, no axial exams were performed on the base material of the nozzle.2. Due to the cladding on the ID two direction coverage from one side is not possible.Because of these two limiting factors, 80% coverage of the code required volume was achieved.
,;__DRAWN BY GE REVIEWED BY LEV- .A-TE LEVEL DATE LEVEL DATE NDT-D-2 Revision 10 October, 1994 Page 47 of 48 FORM NDT-D-2-FI LIQUID PENETRANT EXAMINATION DATA SHEET DATE: -STATION & UNIT: LaSalle Unit I DATA SHEET # ('6 -Oi35 EXAMINER:
V6A .A6 ~LEVEL: 2Z SYSTEM: 1-4/fC 5 MATERIAL:
(5 COMPONENT:
SECTION XI EDITION & ADDENDA: 1989 Edition, No Addenda CODE CLASS: _ _ _ _SECTION XI CATEGORY:
C -6 ACCEPTANCE STD.: /1 /C "-55/f5 PROCEDURE
# & REVISION:
NDT-D-2 Rev. 10 SKETCH SHEET USED: YES ___ NO COMMENTS:
Configuration: ) ,_ -, /7-0 440,-4-_" ,(A 4r etK9,M1A1,0/r/
-~- 70?9 ~ Z'T 9Z7/u52?J/LIQUID PENETRANT EXAM: MATERIAL: MATERIAL MANUFACTURE:
Magnaflux TYPE BATCH PRE-EXAM CLEANER: SKC-S -" PENETRANT:
SKL-SP 0 y e PENETRANT CLEANER: SKC-S I/-.) 5 DEVELOPER:
SKD-S2 POST EXAM CLEANER: SKC-S SURFACE TEMPERATURE: .E " &deg; /ffq/9 _3 LIGHT SOURCE: EXAMINATION RESULTS: ACCEPT REJECT DRYING PENETRATION DRYING DEVELOPING
/O 5 MINUTES MINUTES MINUTES MINUTES ltll'4/REVIEWED BY: EXAMINER:-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _REVIEWER:_______________
____OTHER: &#xfd;-/6?'42.'z 4~ i STATION: ~::.-6ih ANI I: % -L--N LEVEL: LEVEL: LEVEL: DATE: DATE: DATE: DATE: DATE:
Revision 10 October, 1994 W UDT-D-2-V2 Page 48 of 48 STLH SHEET FOR IUITD P MT Dm sS=lU 'T ((XH CMC'9(o,__ STATION A MIT: L -& ( VAJlr 5,.' -,,A) C Pu1-- e-WnTASETo_LMM CEME-r~c) 'b 7~2 3oOp~5~T5'p22,.,77 ,,<7*;7-//5 /' .2V: a'(A * &d _S 1//ci=&WA6 TO Eyirq1Ikf Ak&EA~ S1&wA-) Oui 7-0 LJ1C/< 6'F --PI/YI5/C&#xfd;P9
//ccE65s bPOf W161-,- P'PETh 5d/DCOLIts-r 9 6 in/c1 6011' c~/,'00e g/0  776 LZM6 C 2 9 IUC67- /PAO9kY4i PEVIEWEDi7 BY: ANII<: K j DAT.:_______
Am (Repor No.: EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET GE NUCLEAR ENERGY LaSalle Unit I LIR08 ".01 11.0083.2 LCS-1-N6A N-SH GEL-1109 RPV B-D ID Number: Component ID: Configuration:
Drawing: System: ASME Cat.:Examination Cert Exam Exams Data Cal Procedum Calibration Personnel Level Completed Performed Sheet Sheet Revision Block CE Frakes !I 11/04/99 0 D-147 D-147 UT-DRD-300V3 R.0 01-91-03 45S D-148 D-148 Ut-DRD-300V3 R.0 01-91-03 60S D-149 D-149 UT-DRD-300V3 R.0 01-91-03 Examination Results: Ultrasonic examinations were performed using a combination of 0% 45&deg; and 60' shear wave search units.No examination performed from the nozzle side due to configuration.
No recordable indications were detected.69.5% coverage of the required ASME Section Xl volume was achieved.Examination results were compared to data report D673,675,677 from L I R03 outage with X No Change These examinations were performed under Work Order. N/A Change This Summary and the following data sheets have been reviewed and accepted by the following personnel:
RWP: 1107-/.4 Dose: t00 mr.Revi By- Level: Date: Station Reviewed By: Title: Date: 777R ,ae7 A N R , 0weB: it atPg f Reviewed By: Level: Date: ANII R wed By: Title: Date: Page 1 of 9 LaSalle Unit I N6 Nozzle 0&deg; wm 45' T-scan 60" T-scan 45' P-scan CW 45" P-scan CW 60' P-scan CW 60' P-scan CCW Examination coverage obtained no limitations.CROSS SECTIONAL AREA (per slice) TOTAL CODE COVERAGEcode cross area area % of code area % of code area degrees degrees percent percent sectional scanned scanned scanned scanned scanned scanned scanned scanned area automated manually automated manually automated manually automated manually 62.4 0.0 32.3 0.0 51.8 0.0 360.0 0.0 51.8 62.4 0.0 51.2 0.0 82.1 0.0 360.0 0.0 82.1 62,4 0.0 54.6 0.0 87.5 0.0 360.0 0.0 87.5 62.4 0.0 40.1 0.0 64.3 0.0 360.0 0.0 64.3 62.4 0.0 40.1 0.0 64.3 0.0 360.0 0.0 64.3 62.4 0.0 42.6 0.0 68.3 0.0 360.0 0.0 68.3 62.4 0.0 42.6 0.0 68.3 0.0 360.0 0.0 68,3 0.0 69.5 Manual scans were not restricted.
No credit taken for initial 1/4" of material in Code coverage calculations due to near field effects.*. ??,o'A 2 /1- r, 22 Total Composite Coverage
-69.5%
Lasalle 1 LPCI 45&deg; and 60" T-scan exammination coverage 0" L-wave scan coverage 60*T 60'?~ e24)-A~2~ i/!PA 7 401&#xfd;,PO&#xfd; e&#xfd; e. -g 91 Lasalle 1 LPCI 45 and 60 P-scan examination coverage/ ,,:,<.,-2 6~ i/7L- , -19 1/44 i2 ~ 7j /A -14 b / 4 2 Z 2 IQ&Report No.: EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET GE NUCLEAR ENERGY LaSalle Unit I LI R08 11.0085.2 LCS-1-N6C N-SH GEL-1109 RPV B-D ID Number: Component ID: Configuration:
Drawing: System: ASME Cat.: Examination Cert Exam Exams Data Cal Procedure Calibration Personnel Level Completed Performed Sheet Sheet Revision Block CE Frakes l 11/04/99 0 D-150 D-150 LUT-DRD-300V3 R.0 01-91-03 45S D-151 D-151 rlT-DRD-300V3 R.0 01-91-03 60S D-152 D-152 UT-DRD-300V3 R.0 01-91-03 Examination Results: Ultrasonic examinations were performed using a combination of 0', 45" and 60&deg; shear wave search units.No examination performed from the nozzle side due to configuration.
No recordable indications were detected.69.5% coverage of the required ASME Section XI volume was achieved.(Examination results were compared to data report -D674,676,678 from L 1R03 outage with X No Change These examinations were performed under Work Order: N/A Change This Summary and the following data sheets have been reviewed and accepted by the following personnel RWP: 1107 Dose: 100 mr.Rev wedB% Level: Da &#xfd;e: Station Reviewed By: Title: Date: Reviewed By: Level: Date: ANII R6(ewed By: Title: Date: Page 1 of 9 Reiee B:Lee: ae NI ~we y ile Dte ag o/
LaSalle Unit I N6 Nozle 0&deg; wm 45' T-scan 60* T-scan 45' P-scan CW 45" P-scan CW 60" P-scan CW 60" P-scan CCW Examination coverage obtained no limitations, CROSS SECTIONAL AREA (per slice) TOTAL CODE COVERAGE code cross area area % of code area % of code area degrees degrees percent percent sectional scanned scanned scanned scanned scanned scanned scanned scanned area automated manually automated manually automated manually automated manually 62.4 0.0 32.3 0.0 51.8 0.0 360.0 0.0 51.8 62.4 0.0 51.2 0.0 82.1 0.0 360.0 0.0 82.1 62.4 0.0 54.6 0.0 87.5 0.0 -360.0 0.0 87.5 62.4 0.0 40.1 0.0 64.3 0.0 360.0 0.0 64.3 62.4 0.0 40.1 0.0 64.3 0.0 360.0 0.0 64.3 62.4 0.0 42.6 0.0 66.3 0.0 360.0 0.0 68.3 62.4 0.0 42.6 0.0 68.3 0.0 360.0 0.0 68.3 0.0 69.5 Manual scans were not restricted.
No credit taken for initial 1/4" of material in Code coverage calculations due to near field effects.Total Composite Coverage =69.5%4EPR # ??.o 0
.-1 , -'-~6A~--- , , /or)
Lasalle 1 LPCI 450 and 60" T-scan exammination coverage 0* L-wave scan coverage l , 64- , -/5, -S2.r Lasalle 1 LPCI 45' and 60" P-scan examination coverage 60"1?~ o/~-# O-/S~5, ~-~'5J , 6 -/5L~ 1/4 /~?~ ~2 z, -Pci;;r Report No.: EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET 1R9-016 GE NUCLEAR ENERGY Site and Unit: LaSalle Component ID: LCS-1-N10 Outage: LI R09 N-SH System: RPV ASME Cat.: B-D ASME Item B3.90 Aug Requirements:
N/A Exams Performed Data Sheet Cal Sheet Procedure Calibration Block Examination C Level Date I 7Personnel 600 Shear RPV-036 N/A UT-EXLN-300 V4 01-91-03 3 Paul Anderson I1 01/17/2002 0&deg; Long. R, RPV-037 N/A UT-EXLN-300 V4 01-91-03 Paul Anderson 1II 01/17/2002 At ;,,i45 Shear " RPV-035 N/A UT-EXLN-300 V4 01-91-03 Paul Anderson II 01t17/2002 Examination Results: Manual 0O weld and base metal, 450/600 S transverse and parallel scans were performed on the N10 Recirculation inlet nozzle in accordance with procedure UT-EXLN-300 V4.Manual scanning was performed 3600 around the nozzle.There were no recordable indications.
Due to the nozzle configuration it is not possible to examine 100% of the ASME code required area.Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PVC Section Xl 1989 Edition, no Addenda, Category B-D welds and USNRC Reg.
Guide 1.150 Revision 1 (Alternate Method).Previous examination results were reviewed, no change.Manual composite coverage = 72.4%Examinaton results were compared to data report D-680, 682, 684 from R03 outage with [] No Change These examinations were performed under Work Order: 99270105 D Change This Summary and the following data sheets have been reviewed and accepte&#xfd; ,yt e folowing personnel:
2_..),.. p RWP: N/A rJ _ti/ -,0 Dose: N/A mr.Prepared By: Level: Date: Utility Reviewed By Title: Date: Reviewed By / Level: Date: ANII Reviewed By: Title: Date: Page 1 of LaSalle Unit1 CRD (NIO NOZZLE)Jan-02 P 0.0 0 00 WELD METAL N 45' T-SCAN N 45' T-SCAN NIA 450 T-SCAN N/A 600 T-SCAN N 60&deg; T-SCAN N/A 60' T-SCAN N/A 450 P-SCAN CW N 600 P-SCAN CW N 450 P-SCAN CCW N 600 P-SCAN CCW N CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Area Scanned % of Area Scanned Degrees Scanned % Scanned Area Inch 2  Auto Manual Auto Manual Auto Manual Auto Manual 60.51 0.0 32.6 0.0 53.9 0.0 360.0 0.0 53.9 60.51 0.0 49.4 0.0 81.7 0.0 360.0 0.0 81.7 60.51 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 60.51 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 60.51 0.0 52.1 0.0 86.1 0.0 360.0 0.0 86.1 60.51 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 60.51 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 60.51 0.0 47.7 0.0 78.9 0.0 360.0 0.0 78.9 60.51 0.0 50.7 0.0 83.8 0.0 360.0 0.0 83.8 60.51 0.0 47;7 0.0 78.9 0.0 360.0 0.0 78.9 60.51 0.0 26.2 0.0 43.3 0.0 360.0 0.0 43.3 Coverages 0.0 72.4 Total Composite Coverage = 72.4 COMMENTS: Manual UT scans were limited due to the OD blend radius.CovCalc.xis 10/6/00-!
LaSalle 1 CRD (N10)a Required 00 450 and 600 T-Scan Exam Volume -60.51 Sq. In.11N Codi 0T Exam Volume -32.61 Sq. In.456 T-Scan Exam Volume -49.42 Sq. In.600 T-Scan Exam Volume -52.07 Sq. In.100 600 03--o 0 Code 45 0 F 60 0 F LaSalle 1 CRD (N 10)Required 450 and 600 P-Scan Exam Volume -60.51 Sq. In.'-Scan Exam Volume -47.72 Sq. In.'-Scan Exam Volume -50.72 Sq. In.450 0 Report No.: EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET 1R9-017 GE NUCLEAR ENERGY Site and Unit: LaSalle Component D: LCS-1-N2B Outage: L1R09 N-SH System: RPV ASME Cat.: B-D ASME Item B3. 90 Aug Requirements:
N/A Exams Performed Data Sheet Cal Sheet Procedure Calibration Block Examination Certl Exm PoPersonnel 60
* Shear RPV-012 N/A UT-EXLN-300 yq 01-91-03 Charles Barrett II 01/15/2002 0- Long. RPV-004 N/A UT-EXLN-300 V4 01-91-03 Todd Ginder II 01/15/2002.ea45 She, ''RPV-008 N/A UT-EXLN-300 V/q 01-91-03 Edward Mazyck II 01/15/2002 Examination Results: Manual 00 weld and base metal, 450/600 S transverse and parallel scans were performed on the N2B Recirculation inlet nozzle in accordance with procedure UT-EXLN-300 V4.Manual scanning was performed 360' around the nozzle.There were no recordable indications.
Due to the nozzle configuration it is not possible to examine 100% of the ASME code required area.Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PVC Section XI 1989 Edition, no Addenda, ,, Category B-D welds and USNRC Reg. Guide 1.150 Revision 1 (Alternate Method).Previous examination results were reviewed, no change.Manual composite coverage = 70.9%Examination results were compared to data report D-117,126,136 from Li R04 outage with rv No Change These examinations were performed under Work Order: 99270105 ED Change This Summary and the following data sheets have been reviewed and acce ted by thyfollowing personnel:
R/ * .A /Dose: N/A mr.repared By: Level: Date: Utility Reviewed By: Title: ate: Reviewed By: Level: Date: ANII Reviewed By: Title: Date: Page 1 of LaSalle Unit1 N2B Recirculation Inlet JAN. 2002 V 00 WELD METAL N 450 T-SCAN N 450 T-SCAN N/A 450 T-SCAN N/A 600 T-SCAN N 600 T-SCAN N/A 600 T-SCAN N/A 450 P-SCAN CW 600 P-SCAN CW 45' P-SCAN CCW 600 P-SCAN CCW N N N N CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Area Scanned % of Area Scanned Degrees Scanned % Scanned Area Inch 2  Auto Manual Auto Manual Auto Manual Auto Manual 76.82 0.0 41.1 0.0 53.4 0.0 360.0 0.0 53.4 76.82 0.0 63.1 0.0 82.2 0.0 360.0 0.0 82.2 76.82 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 76.82 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 76.82 0.0 66.1 0.0 86.1 0.0 360.0 0.0 86.1 76.82 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 76.82 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 76.82 0.0 51.1 0.0 66.5 0.0 360.0 0.0 66.5 76.82 0.0 54.5 0.0 70.9 0.0 360.0 0.0 70.9 76.82 0.0 51.1 0.0 66.5 0.0 360.0 0.0 66.5 76.82 0.0 54'5 0.0 70.9 0.0 360.0 0.0 70.9 Coverages 0.0 70.9 Total Composite Coverage = 70.9 COMMENTS: Manual UT scans were limited due to nozzle radius.CovCalc.xls 10/6/00 LaSalle 1 Recirculation Inlet (N2)00 L-Wave Scan examination coverage 450 and 600 T-Scan examination coverage LaSalle 1 Recirculation Inlet (N2)450 and 600 P-Scan examination coverage I NJ-N
!Report No.: EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET 1R9-018 GE NUCLEAR ENERG Y Site and Unit: LaSalle Component ID: LCS-1 -N2C Outage: LI R09 N-SH System: RPV ASME Cat.: B-D ASME Item B3. 90 Aug Requirements:
N/A Exams Performed Data Sheet Cal Sheet Procedure Calibration Block Examination Cert Level Date7 Personnel 60
* Shear RPV-013 N/A UT-EXLN-300 Vy 01-91-03 Charles Barrett II 01/15/2002 0&deg; Long. RPV-005 .N/A UT-EXLN-300 V 01-91-03 Todd Ginder II 01/15/2002" '&#xfd;- 46P Shear- '' RPV-009 N/A UT-EXLN-300 -t&, 01-91-03 Edward Mazyck II 01/15/2002 Examination Results: Manual 00 weld and base metal, 450/600 S transverse and parallel scans were performed on the N2C Recirculation inlet nozzle in accordance with procedure UT-EXLN-300 V4.Manual scanning was performed 3600 around the nozzle.There were no recordable indications.
Due to the nozzle configuration it is not possible to examine 100% of the ASME code required area.Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PVC Section Xl 1989 Edition, no Addenda, Category B-D welds and USNRC Reg.
Guide 1.150 Revision 1 (Alternate Method).Previous examination results were reviewed, no change.Manual composite coverage
= 70.9%(Examination results were compared to data report D-118,127,137 from LIR04 outage with [] No ChangeThese examinations were performed under Work Order: 99270105 D Change This Summary and the following data sheets have been revi 7 wed and accept by following personnel:
/(5)~ /~f Z~.- Dose: N/A mr, Prepared By: Level: Date: Utility Reviewed By: / Title: Date: Reviewed By: Level: Date: ANII Reviewed By: Title: Date: Page 1 of 7 LaSalle Uniti N2C Recirculation Inlet JAN. 2002*0 U.0 O 0 WELD METAL N 450 T-SCAN N 450 T-SCAN N/A 45' T-SCAN NIA 600 T-SCAN N 600 T-SCAN N/A 600 T-SCAN N/A 450 P-SCAN CW N 60' P-SCAN CW N 450 P-SCAN CCW N 60' P-SCAN CCW N CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Area Scanned % of Area Scanned Degrees Scanned % Scanned Area Inch 2  Auto Manual Auto Manual Auto Manual Auto Manual 76.82 0.0 41.1 0.0 53.4 0.0 360.0 0.0 53.4 76.82 0.0 63.1 0.0 82.2 0.0 360.0 0.0 82.2 76.82 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 76.82 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 76.82 0.0 66.1 0.0 86.1 0.0 360.0 0.0 86.1 76.82 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 76.82 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 76.82 0.0 51.1 0.0 66.5 0.0 360.0 0.0 66.5 76.82 0.0 54.5 0.0 70.9 0.0 360.0 0.0 70.9 76.82 0.0 51.1 0.0 66.5 0.0 360.0 0.0 66.5 76.82 0.0 54.5 0.0 70.9 0.0 360.0 0.0 70.9 Coverages 0.0 70.9 Total Composite Coverage = 70.9 COMMENTS: Manual UT scans were limited due to nozzle radius.Cov~al~xls 0/6/0 CovCalc.xls 10/6/00 LaSalle 1 Recirculation Inlet (N2)450 and 600 P-Scan examination coverage/-'I'N I LaSalle 1 Recirculation Inlet (N2)0&deg; L-Wave Scan examination coverage 450 and 600 T-Scan examination coverage C, (I Report No.: EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET 1R9-019 GE NUCLEAR ENERGY Site and Unit. LaSalle Component ID: L&#xfd;CS-1-N2D Outage: LI R09 System: ASME Cat: B-D ASME Item B3. 90 Aug Requirements:
N/AExams Performed Data Sheet Cal Sheet Procedure Calibration Block Examinatibn Cert Level Date Personnel SLong. RPV-017 N/A UT-EXLN-300 V4 01-91-03 Hermann ct 0 /15/20 450 Shear RPV-01 8 N/A UT-EXLN-300 V4 01-91-03 Hermann Schlortt III 01/15/2002 6 shear RPV-019 N/A UT-EXLN-300 V4 01-91-03 Hermann Sclhlortt III 0111512002 Examination Results: Manual 00 weld and base metal, 450/600 S transverse and parallel scans were performed on the N2D Recirculation inlet nozzle in accordance with procedure UT-EXLN-300 V4.Manual scanning was performed 3600 around the nozzle.There were no recordable indications.
Due to the nozzle configuration it is not possible to examine 100% of the ASME code required area.Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PVC Section XI 1989 Edition, no Addenda, Category B-D welds and USNRC Reg. Guide 1.150 Revision 1 (Alternative Method).Previous examination results were reviewed, no change.Manual Composite Coverage = 70.9%Examination results were compared to data report D-119, 128,138 from L 1R04 outage with r] No Change These examinations were performed under Work Order: 99270105 Change This Summary and the following data sheets have been reviewed and accepted by the following personnel:
RWP: N/A___..._ _ Z N/A mr.Prepared By: Level: Date: Utility Reviewed By: Title: Date: Reviewed By: Level: Date: ANII Reviewed By: Title: Date: Page 1' of 7 LaSalle Unit1 N2D Recirculation Inlet JAN. 2002 0 00 WELD METAL N 450 T-SCAN N 450 T-SCAN NIA 45&deg; T-SCAN N/A 600 T-SCAN N 600 T-SCAN N/A 60' T-SCAN N/A 450 P-SCAN CW N 600 P-SCAN CW N 450 P-SCAN CCW N 60' P-SCAN CCW N CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Area Scanned % of Area Scanned Degrees Scanned % Scanned Area Inch 2  Auto Manual Auto Manual Auto Manual Auto Manual 76.82 0.0 41.1 0.0 53.4 0.0 360.0 0.0 53.4 76.82 0.0 63.1 0.0 82.2 0.0 360.0 0.0 82.2 76.82 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 76.82 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 76.82 0.0 66.1 0.0 86.1 0.0 360.0 0.0 86.1 76.82 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 76.82 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 76.82 0.0 51.1 0.0 66.5 0.0 360.0 0.0 66.5 76.82 0.0 54.5 0.0 70.9 0.0 360.0 0.0 70.9 76.82 0.0 51.1 0.0 66.5 0.0 360.0 0.0 66.5 76.82 0.0 54.5 0.0 70.9 0.0 360.0 0.0 70.9 Coveragesi 0.0 1 70.9 Total Composite Coverage = 70.9 COMMENTS: Manual UT scans were limited due to nozzle radius.CovCalc.xls 10/6/00
\/LaSalle 1 Recirculation Inlet (N2)00 L-Wave Scan examination coverage 450 and 600 T-Scan examination coverage w 00O-o-TI-C LaSalle 1 Recirculation Inlet (N2)450 and 600 P-Scan examination coverage NA-o 2~i (K Report No.: EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET IR9-020 GE NUCLEAR ENERGY Site and Unit: LaSalle Component ID: LCS-1 -N2E Outage: LI R09 N-SH System: ASME Cat.: B-D ASME Item B3. 90 Aug Requirements:
N/A Exams Performed Data Sheet Cal Sheet Procedure Calibration Block Examination Cert Level Date Lo g.IPersonnel 00 og RPV-01 4 N/A UT-EXLN-300 V4 01-91-03 Chad Olson 11 01/115/2002 450 Shear RPV-015 N/A UT-EXLN-300 V4 01-91-03 Chad Olson II 01/15/2002
-*:6OShear N/A UT-EXLN-300 V4 01-91-03 Chad Olson II 01/15/2002 Examination Results: Manual 0' weld and base metal, 450/600 S transverse and parallel scans were performed on the N2E Recirculation inlet nozzle in accordance with procedure UT-EXLN-300 V4.Manual scanning was performed 3600 around the nozzle.There were no recordable indications.
Due to the nozzle configuration it is not possible to examine 100% of the ASME code required area.Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PVC Section Xl 1989 Edition, no Addenda, Category B-D welds and USNRC Reg. Guide 1.150 Revision 1 (Alternative Method).Previous examination results were reviewed, no change.Manual Composite Coverage = 70.9%Examination results were compared to data report D-120,129,139 from LiR04 outage with E No Change These examinations were performed under Work Order: 99270105 B Change This Summary and the following data sheets have been reviewed and accepted b the following personnel.
RWP: N/A ZI T 'u- ~ Dose: N/A mr.Prepared By: Level: Date: Utili Reviewed By: Title: bate: Reviewed By: K Level: Date: ANII Reviewed By: Title: Date: Page 1 of 7' LaSalle Unit1 N2E Recirculation Inlet JAN. 2002 0&deg; WELD METAL 45&deg; T-SCAN 450 T-SCAN 450 T-SCAN 600 T-SCAN 600 T-SCAN 600 T-SCAN 450 P-SCAN CW 60' P-SCAN CW 45' P-SCAN CCW 60' P-SCAN CCW 0 N N N/A NIA N N/A N/A N N N N CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Area Scanned % of Area Scanned Degrees Scanned % Scanned Area Inch 2  Auto Manual Auto Manual Auto Manual Auto Manual 76.82 0.0 41.1 0.0 53.4 0.0 360.0 0.0 53.4 76.82 0.0 63.1 0.0 82.2 0.0 360.0 0.0 82.2 76.82 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 76.82 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 76.82 0.0 66.1 0.0 86.1 0.0 360.0 0.0 86.1 76.82 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 76.82 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 76.82 0.0 51.1 0.0 66.5 0.0 360.0 0.0 66.5 76.82 0.0 54.5 0.0 70.9 0.0 360.0 0.0 70.9 76.82 0.0 51.1 0.0 66.5 0.0 360.0 0.0 66.5 76.82 0.0 54.5 0.0 70.9 0.0 360.0 0.0 70.9 Coverages 0.0 70.9 Total Composite Coverage = 70.9 COMMENTS: Manual UT scans were limited due to nozzle radius.t, CovCatc.xls 10/6/00 I LaSalle 1 Recirculation Inlet (N2)00 L-Wave Scan examination coverage 450 and 600 T-Scan examination coverage 600 C N N-o C, N 0 LaSalle 1 Recirculation Inlet (N2)45* and 60* P-Scan examination coverage/-'0 N Report No.: EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET IR9 021 GE NUCLEAR ENERGY Site and Unit: LaSalle Component ID: LCS-1-N2F Outage: LI R09 N-SH System: RPV ASME Cat.:
B-O ASME Item B3.90 Aug Requirements:
N/A ExmIefre Dat She I I Exams Performed Data Sheet Cal Sheet Procedure Calibration Block Examination Cert Level Date Personnel 0&deg; Long. RPV-032 N/A UT-EXLN-300 V4 01-91-03 Paul Anderson II 01/17/2002 60 S Shear RPV-033 N/A UT-EXLN-300 V4 01-91-03 Paul Anderson II 01/17/2002
.'45- Shear -['- RPV-034 N/A UT-EXLN-300 V4 01-91-03 Paul Anderson II 01/17/2002 Examination Results: Manual 00 weld and base metal, 450/600 S transverse and parallel scans were performed on the N2F Recirculation inlet nozzle in accordance with procedure UT-EXLN-300 V4.Manual scanning was performed 3600 around the nozzle.There were no recordable indications.
Due to the nozzle configuration it is not possible to examine 100% of the ASME code required area.Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PVC Section Xl 1989 Edition, no Addenda, Category B-D welds and USNRC Reg. Guide 1.150 Revision 1 (Alternate Method).Previous examination results were reviewed, no change.Manual composite coverage = 70.9%Examination results were compared to data report 0-121,130,140 from R04 outage with 7 No Change These examinations were performed under Work Order: 99270105 D Change This Summary and the following data sheets have been re wed and accepted by the following personnel:
RWP: N/A (2.ADose: N/A mr.4repared By: Level: Date: Utility Reviewed By: Title: /fate Reviewed By: Level: Date: ANII Reviewed By: Title: Date: Page 1 of LaSalle Unit1 N2F Recirculation Inlet JAN. 2002 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE 2 Area Scanned % of Area Scanned Degrees Scanned % Scanned o Area Inch Auto Manual Auto Manual Auto Manual Auto Manual 0&deg; WELD METAL N 76.82 0.0 41.1 0.0 53.4 0.0 360.0 0.0 53.4 450 T-SCAN N 76.82 0.0 63.1 0.0 82.2 0.0 360.0 0.0 82.2 450 T-SCAN N/A 76.82 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 450 T-SCAN N/A 76.82 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 600 T-SCAN N 76.82 0.0 66.1 0.0 86.1 0.0 360.0 0.0 86.1 600 T-SCAN N/A 76.82 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 600 T-SCAN N/A 76.82 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 450 P-SCAN CW N 76.82 0.0 51.1 0.0 66.5 0.0 360.0 0.0 66.5 60' P-SCAN CW N 76.82 0.0 54.5 0.0 70.9 0.0 360.0 0.0 70.9 450 P-SCAN CCW N 76.82 0.0 51.1 0.0 66.5 0.0 360.0 0.0 66.5 60' P-SCAN CCW N 76.82 0.0 54.5 0.0 70.9 0.0 360.0 0.0 70.9 Coverages 0.0 70.9 Total Composite Coverage = 70.9 COMMENTS: Manual UT scans were limited due to nozzle radius.CovCalc.xis 10/6/00 (.0-,4~0 C LaSalle 1 Recirculation Inlet (N2)0* L-Wave Scan examination coverage 450 and 600 T-Scan examination coverage 0OO N LaSalle 1 Recirculation Inlet (N2)450 and 600 P-Scan examination coverage I (Report No.: EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET IR9-022 GE NUCLEAR ENERGY S#e and Unit: LaSalle Component 1D. LCS-1 -N2J Outage: LI R09 N-SH System: RPV ASME Cat.: B-D ASME Item 83. 90 Aug Requirements:
N/A Exams Performed Data Sheet Procedure Calibration Block Examination Cert Level Date_1t~ eetI Personnel 60
* Shear RPV-01 1 N/A UT-EXLN-300 vyv 01-91-03 Charles Barrett II 01/15/2002 0&deg; Long' e .] RPV-003 N/A UT-EXLN-300 vj 01-91-03 Todd Ginder II 01/15/2002 46- Shegr"-;'i , RPV-007 N/A UT-EXLN-300 V4 01-91-03 Edward Mazyck II 01/15/2002 Examination Results: Manual 01 weld and base metal, 450/600 S transverse and parallel scans were performed on the N2J Recirculation inlet nozzle in accordance with procedure UT-EXLN-300 V4.Manual scanning was performed 3600 around the nozzle.There were no recordable indications.
Due to the nozzle configuration it is not possible to examine 100% of the ASME code required area.Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PVC Section XI 1989 Edition, no Addenda, Category B-D welds and USNRC Reg.
Guide 1.150 Revision 1 (Alternate Method).Previous examination results were reviewed, no change.Manual composite coverage = 70.9%Examination results were compared to data report D-115,133,143 from L1 R04 outage with [ No Change These examinations were performed under Work Order: 99270105 D Change This Summary and the following data sheets have been review d and a e by following personnel., RWP: N/A L.4 Dose: N/A mr.Prepared By: Level: Date: Utility Reviewed By: le: :_ _ _ _Reviewed By: Level: Date: ANII Reviewed By: Title: Date: Page 1 of 7 LaSalle Unit1 N2J Recirculation Inlet JAN. 2002 0Q WELD METAL 450 T-SCAN 450 T-SCAN 450 T-SCAN 60o T-SCAN 600 T-SCAN 60&deg; T-SCAN 450 P-SCAN CW 600 P-SCAN CW 450 P-SCAN CCW 600 P-SCAN CCW 0 N N NIA NIA N NIA N/A N N N N CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Area Scanned % of Area Scanned Degrees Scanned % Scanned Area Inch 2  Auto Manual Auto Manual Auto Manual Auto Manual 76.82 0.0 41.1 0.0 53.4 0.0 360.0 0.0 53.4 76.82 0.0 63.1 0.0 82.2 0.0 360.0 0.0 82.2 76.82 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 76.82 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 76.82 0.0 66.1 0.0 86.1 0.0 360.0 0.0 86.1 76.82 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 76.82 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 76.82 0.0 51.1 0.0 66.5 0.0 360.0 0.0 66.5 76.82 0.0 54.5 0.0 70.9 0.0 360.0 0.0 70.9 76.82 0.0 51.1 0.0 66.5 0.0 360.0 0.0 66.5 76.82 0.0 54.5 0.0 70.9 0.0 360.0 0.0 70.9 Coverages 0.0 70.9 Total Composite Coverage 70.9 COMMENTS: Manual UT scans were limited due to nozzle radius.tJ'N CavCaic~xis 10/6/00>41 I LaSalle 1 Recirculation Inlet (N2)00 L-Wave Scan examination coverage 450 and 600 T-Scan examination coverage 00-.4-0 P'J LaSalle 1 Recirculation Inlet (N2)450 and 600 P-Scan examination coverage/Na"N-0 S,,Report No.: EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET 1RE23 ETMGE NUCLEAR ENERGY __ER Site and Unit: LaSalle Component ID: LCS-I -N2K Outage: LI R09 N-SH System: RPV ASME Cat.: B-D ASME Item B3.90 Aug Requirements:
N/A Exams Performed Data Sheet Cal Shee Procedure Calibration Block Examination Cert Level Date_WI _ Personnel 0&deg; Long. RPV-002 N/A UT-EXLN-300 01-91-03 Todd Ginder II 01/15/2002 45&deg; Shear. RPV-006 N/A UT-EXLN-300 01-91-03 Edward Mazyck II 01/15/2002 ,i 4 RPV-010 N/A UT-EXLN-300 v(J 01-91-03 Charles Barrett II 01/15/2002 Examination Results: Manual 00 weld and base metal, 450/600 S transverse and parallel scans were performed on the N2K Recirculation inlet nozzle in accordance with procedure UT-EXLN-300 V4.Manual scanning was performed 3600 around the nozzle.There were no recordable indications.
Due to the nozzle configuration it is not possible to examine 100% of the ASME code required area.Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PVC Section X1 1989 Edition, no Addenda, Category B-D welds and USNRC Reg.
Guide 1.1 50 Revision 1 (Alternate Method).Previous examination results were reviewed, no change.Manual composite coverage = 70.9%Examination results were compared to data report D-124,134,144 from L1 R04 outage with .No Change These examinations were performed under Work Order: 99270105 D Change This Summary and the following data sheets have been re ' wed and accep by th following personnel:
RWP: N/A , pJJ4. i _~ .Dose: N/A mr.Prepared By: Level: Date: Utility Reviewed By: / Title: +DaR d Leel Date: .ANII R yta Reviewed By. Level: Date: ANII Reviewed By: Title: Date: Page 1 of7 LaSalle Unit1 N2K Recirculation Inlet JAN. 20020 0&deg; WELD METAL N 450 T-SCAN N 45&deg; T-SCAN NIA 450 T-SCAN NIA 600 T-SCAN N 600 T-SCAN NIA 600 T-SCAN N/A 450 P-SCAN CW N 600 P-SCAN CW N 450 P-SCAN CCW N 600 P-SCAN CCW N CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Area Scanned % of Area Scanned Degrees Scanned % Scanned Area Inch 2  Auto Manual Auto Manual Auto Manual Auto Manual 76.82 0.0 41.1 0.0 53.4 0.0 360.0 0.0 53.4 76.82 0.0 63.1 0.0 82.2 0.0 360.0 0.0 82.2 76.82 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 76.82 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 76.82 0.0 66.1 0.0 86.1 0.0 360.0 0.0 86.1 76.82 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 76.82 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 76.82 0.0 51.1 0.0 66.5 0.0 360.0 0.0 66.5 76.82 0.0 54.5 0.0 70.9 0.0 360.0 0.0 70.9 76.82 0.0 51.1 0.0 66.5 0.0 360.0 0.0 66.5 76.82 0.0 54.5 0.0 70.9 0.0 360.0 0.0 70.9 Coverages 0.0 70.9 Total Composite Coverage = 70.9 COMMENTS: Manual UT scans were limited due to nozzle radius.*0.~~N CovCaic.xls 1016/00
:=i U LaSalle 1 Recirculation Inlet (N2)-450 and 600 P-Scan examination coverage I'1~'4 LaSalle 1 Recirculation Inlet (N2)0* L-Wave Scan examination coverage 450 and 600 T-Scan examination coverage 0o"-4i-o 0'NJ'%tJ
~GE NUCLEAR ENERGY UT EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET REPORT NO: 1R9-024 PROJECT LaSalle Unit 1 -L1RO9 WELD ID: LCS-1-N4A SYSTEM: RPV -FEEDWATER INITIAL CALIBRATION ID: NOZ.IN1, 70RL.IN.1 CALIBRATION VERIFICATIONS:
N4A.2, N4A.3, N4A.70RL.1, N4A.70RL.2 DATA SHEETS: n4a.tI.1, n4a.tl.2, n4a.tl.3, n4a.pl.1, n4a.p 2.1, n4a.70rl.1 FINAL CALIBRATION ID: SEE
 
==SUMMARY==
SECTION BELOW MANUAL CALIBRATION:
NIA EXAMINERS:..-
J. Kent Montgomery, Lv II, Mark Hilborn, Lv II Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code Section XI, 1989 Edition noAddenda, Category B-D welds and USNRC Reg Guide 1.150 Revision 1 (Alternative Method).
Automated 0', 2.25 L-Wave; 450 and 600 Shear 1.0 MHz and 700 RL 2.0 MHz Transverse and Parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure GE-UT-702 Version 2.Initial calibrations for the 0&deg;, 450 and 600 Shear automated examinations were performed on code vessel block -SIN 91-03.
Calibration for the 700 RL automated examinations were performed on GENE sizing block, S/N -CAL-DPTH-60 ( Refer to G2K-CAL-1 Initial Calibration Summary Sheet).For final automated calibrations and linearities, refer to Calibration Summary Sheet -G2K-CAL-3.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system 0' reference is located 90' CW of nozzle TDC.The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded the following non-relevant indications:
0&deg; Weld Metal -Entry Surface Noise, Geometry -Clad Noise 450 Transverse
-Entry Surface Noise, Geometry
-Clad Noise, Non-Relevant Reflector 600 Transverse
-Entry Surface Noise, Geometry -Clad Noise, Geometry -Nozzle Bore 450 Parallel -Geometry -Clad Noise 600 Parallel -Entry Surface Noise, Geometry
-Clad Noise 700 Transverse
-Entry Surface Noise 70* Parallel -Entry Surface Noise These non-relevant indications were flagged and excluded from the final report.The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded one (1) indication with the 450 Tranverse search unit over 20% DAC which was found to be acceptable.
No other indications requiring evaluation according to ASME B&PV Code Section X1 or USNRC Reg Guide 1.150 Revision 1 (Alternative Method) were recorded.Due to nozzle configuration it is not feasible to examine 100% of the ASME Code required volume.Automated 0',450 and 600 UT Coverage = 72.3%. Credit for the 45&deg;/600 near field taken with the 70*.Automated 70' Near Surface UT Coverage = 44.7%Previous data was reviewed prior to the examination, changes are noted below.The GERIS 2000 Automated system records the complete RF data during scanning, it also utilizes search units with lower frequency elements and'improved ultrasonic coupling.
The GERIS 2000 Automated System has shown that with its improvements in examination techniques, indications have better reflectivity with a 1 MHz search unit over a 2.25 MHz., which could explain why this indication was not recorded during the prior manual inspection.
Ii LA SALLE SUMNV.DOC 13c PAGEL...OF
-
LaSalle Unit I N4A Jan-02"a 0 N 0O WELD METAL 45&deg; T-SCAN N 60' T-SCAN N N 450 P-SCAN CW 600 P-SCAN CW 450 P-SCAN CCW 600 P-SCAN CCW 70&deg; T-SCAN 70' P-SCAN CW 700 P-SCAN CCW N N N N N N N CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Area Scanned % of Area Scanned Degrees Scanned % Scanned Area Inch 2  Auto Manual Auto Manual Auto Manual Auto Manual 59.12 31.12 0.0 52.6 0.0 360.0 0.0 52.6 0.0 59.12 47.77 0.0 80.8 0.0 360.0 0.0 808 0.0 59.12 50.16 0.0 84.8 0.0 360.0 0.0 84.8 0.0 59.12 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 59.12 37.90 0.0 64.1 0.0 360.0 0.0 64.1 0.0 59.12 47.15 0.0 79.8 0.0 360.0 0.0 79.8 0.0 59.12 37.90 0.0 64.1 0.0 360.0 0.0 64.1 0.0 59.12 47.15 0.0 79.8 0.0 360.0 0.0 79.8 0.0 72.3 0.0 Total 0*, 45* and 60&deg; Coverage = 72.3 21.13 11.75 0.0 1 55.6 0.0 360.0 0.0 55.6 0.0 21.13 8.28 0.0 39.2 0.0 360.0 0.0 39.2 0.0 21.13 8.28 0.0 39.2 0,0 360.0 0.0 39.2 0,0 44.7 0.0 Total 70&deg; Coverage 44.7 COMMENTS: IAutomated UT scans were limited due to the nozzle radius.ICredit for the initial 114" of material in code coverage taken with the 700 1 02/29/01 LEsE Ie E FEEl)WATER Coole Required Exam Votume --; 59.12 Sq, In.0&deg; L-Wave Exam Volume -31.12 Sq, In, 45&deg; T-Scmn Exam Volume -47.77 Sq, In, 60* T-Scan Exam Volume 50,16 Sq, In, c~cr LasaUle I FEEDWATER Code Required Exam Volume -59, 450 P-Scan Exam Volume -37390 600 P-Scan Exam Volume 47,15 Sq.12 Sq, In, Sq, In, In,
.:3 Lcsatte 1 FEEDWATER Code Required Exam Volume -26.13 Sq, 70&deg; T-Scan Exam VoLume -11.75 Sq. In, 70* P-Scan Exam VoLume 8,25 Sq, In, In, 70&deg;T Noazi r(3)GOD-SL6C.xls 09/18/00 LaSalle I N4 FEEDWA TER GERIS-2000 NOZZLE-TO-VESSEL SCANNING LIMITS NOZOD 25 VSLIR 127 WALL 6.69 WELD RAD 17.25 ODBR 4 TYPE F (F-FLANGE OR B-BARREL)Delay INDEX INDEX STEP RADIAL DISTANCE AGATE BE GATE C GATE FIXTURE CPU CH TYPE usec X Y DEG INCHES INCHES START STOP STOP START STOP STOP ANGLE ANGLE 4 0.00 B 3.66 0.00 0.00 0.8" 0.501 0.150 0 19.74 91 47 79 56 1 0.00 W 3.66 0.00 0.00 0.8&deg; 0.320 0.150 0 6.36 91 --56 -2 45.0" T 13.26 3.00 0.00 0.8&deg; 0.418 0.150 0 13.61 235 -7.2&deg; -7.2&deg;3 60.0&deg; T 14.15 -3.00 0.00 0.8&deg; 0.501 0.150 0 19.74 328 354.0&deg; 6.0&deg;2 45.00 P1 13.26 3.00 0.00 0.8' 0.341 0.150 0 7.94 235 300.5&deg; 59.5&deg; (ccw)3 60.00 P1 14.15 -3.00 0.00 0.8' 0.383 0.150 0 10.97 328 295.6- 64.4- (ccw)2 45.0&deg; P2 13.26 3.00 0.00 0.8* 0.341 0.150 0 7.94 235 78.1 -78.1&deg; (cw)3 60.0&deg; P2 14.15 -3.00 0.00 0.8* 0.383 0.150 0 10.97 328 47.8&deg; -47.8&deg; (cw)1/17/2002 Page 1 3108 PM No., 10 GOD-SL6C.xls LaSalle 1 N4 FEEDWA TER GERIS-2000 NOZZLE-TO-VESSEL SCANNING LIMITS NOZOD 25 VSLIR 127 WALL 6.69 WELD RAD 17.25 ODBR 4 TYPE F (F-FLANGE OR B-BARREL)09/18/00 Delay INDEX INDEX STEP RADIAL DISTANCE AGATE BE GATE C GATE FIXTURE CPU CH TYPE usec X Y DEG INCHES INCHES START STOP STOP START STOP STOP ANGLE ANGLE 1 70I0' T 12.00 ,00 0.00 0.8&deg; 0.387 0.150 0 11.27 54 0.0&deg; 0.0&deg;2 70.0' P1 12.00 3.00 0.00 0.8 0.316 0.150, 0 6.10 54 28-5&deg; 72.5- -(ccw)3 70,0' P2 12M0 -3.00 0.00 -0.8* 0.316 0.150 0 6.10 54 72.5* -72,5' :(cw)1/1712002 Page 1c)Aj OGE NUCLEAR ENERGY UT EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET REPORT NO: 1R9-025 PROJECT LaSalle Unit 1 -L1RO9 WELD ID: LCS-1-N4B SYSTEM: RPV -FEEDWATER INITIAL CALIBRATION ID: NOZIN., 70RL.IN.1 CALIBRATION VERIFICATIONS:
N4B.1, N4B.2, N4B.70RL.1, N4B.70RL.2 DATA SHEETS:- n4c.tl.1, n4c.pl.1, n4c.p2.1, n4c.70rI.1 FINAL CALIBRATION ID: SEE
 
==SUMMARY==
SECTION BELOW MANUAL CALIBRATION:
N/A EXAMINERS
.... J. Kent Montgomery, Lv II, Mark Hilborn, Lv II Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code Section Xl, 1989 Edition no Addenda, Category B-D welds and USNRC Reg Guide 1.150 Revision 1 (Alternative Method).
Automated 0', 2.25 L-Wave; 450 and 600 Shear 1.0 MHz and 70&deg; RL 2.0 MHz Transverse and Parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure GE-UT-702 Version 2.Automated scanning was limited due to the nozzle OD blend radius.Initial calibrations for the 00, 450 and 600 Shear automated examinations were performed on code vessel block -SIN 91-03.
Calibration for the 700 RL automated examinations were performed on GENE sizing block, SIN -CAL-DPTH-60 ( Refer to G2K-CAL-1 Initial Calibration Summary Sheet).For final automated calibrations and linearities, refer to Calibration Summary Sheet -G2K-CAL-3.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system 00 reference is located 90* CW of nozzle TDC.The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded the following non-relevant indications:
0' L-Wave -Entry Surface Noise, Geometry -Clad Noise 450 Transverse
-Entry Surface Noise, Geometry -Clad Noise, Geometry -Nozzle b6re 600 Transverse
-Entry Surface Noise, Geometry -Clad Noise, Geometry -Nozzle Bore 450 Parallel -Entry Surface Noise, Geometry -Clad Noise 600 Parallel -Entry Surface Noise, Geometry -Clad Noise 700 Transverse
-Entry Surface Noise, Non-Relevant Reflector 700 Parallel -Non-Relevant Reflector These non-relevant indications were flagged and excluded from the final report.The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded one (1) indication with the 70&deg; Tranverse search unit that was found to be acceptable per the requirements of ASME B&PV Code Section Xl, 1989 Edition No Addenda Table IWB 3510-1 No other indications requiring evaluation according to ASME B&PV Code Section Xl or USNRC Reg Guide 1.150 Revision 1 (Alternative Method) were recorded.Due to nozzle configuration it is not feasible to examine 100% of the ASME Code required volume.Automated 0',450 and 600 UT Coverage = 72.3%Automated 700 Near Surface UT Coverage = 44.7%Credit for the 450/600 near field taken with the 700.Previous data was reviewed prior to the examination, changes are noted below.There was no previous 700 Near Surface data to review or compare.Ii LA SALLE SUMNV.DOC R 0 y PAGE OF LaSalle Unit I N4B Jan-02fLaSalle Unit I N4BJan-02 +0 0&deg; WELD METAL N 450 T-SCAN N 600 T-SCAN N N 450 P-SCAN CW N 60' P-SCAN CW N 450 P-SCAN CCW N 600 P-SCAN CCW N 70' T-SCAN N 70' P-SCAN CW N 700 P-SCAN CCW N CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODe COVERAGE Area Scanned % of Area Scanned Degrees Scanned % Scanned Area Inch 2  Auto Manual Auto Manual Auto Manual Auto Manual 59.12 31.12 0.0 52.6 0.0 360.0 0.0 52.6 0.0 59.12 47.77 0.0 80.8 0.0 360.0 0.0 80.8 0.0 59.12 50.16 0.0 84.8 0.0 360.0 0.0 84.8 0.0 59.12 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 59.12 37.90 0.0 64.1 0.0 360.0 0.0 64.1 0.0 59.12 47.15 0.0 79.8 0.0 360.0 0.0 79.8 0.0 59.12 37.90 0.0 64.1 0.0 360.0 0.0 64.1 0.0 59.12 47.15 0.0 79.8 0.0 360.0 0.0 79.8 0.0 72.3 0.0 Total 0&deg;, 450 and 60* Coverage = 72.3 21.13 11.75 0.0 55.6 0.0 360.0 0.0 55.6 0.0 21.13 8.28 0.0 39.2 0.0 360.0 0.0 39.2 0.0 21.13 8.28 0.0 39.2 0.0 360.0 0.0 39.2 0.0 44.7 0.0 Total 700 Coverage = 44.7 COMMENTS:I I.. -....J I .... .Automated u I scans were limited aue to he nozzle radius.Credit for the initial 114" of material in code coverage taken with the 700 I &#xfd;"--
LcscWle I FEED WATER Code -Required Exam Volume -59,12 .0* L-WVIve Exaim Volume -31,12 Sq. It 45&deg; T-Scn Exam Volume -47.77 Sq, 60&deg; T-Scon Exam Volume 50.16 Sq, In,&#xfd; q.In, In, Lasalle 1 FEEDWATER Codle Required Exam Volume 1 59.12 Sq, In, 450 P-Scan Exam Volume -37,90 Sq, In.600 P-&deg;Scan Exam Volume 47.15 Sq, In, 1 FEEDWATER Code Required Exam Volume -26,13 Sq, In, 70&deg; T-Scan Exam Volume -11.75 Sq. In.70&deg; P-Scan Exam Volume 8,25 Sq, In.70-T 70-P 70*P 70TT I I I-fl I I.___________
NozT_,m(3)
GOD-SL6C.xls 09/18/00 LaSalle 1 N4 FEED WA TER GERIS-2000 NOZZLE-TO-VESSEL SCANNING LIMITS NOZOD VSLIR WALL WELD RAD ODBR TYPE 25 127 6.69 17.25 4 F (F-FLANGE OR B-BARREL)Delay INDEX INDEX STEP RADIAL DISTANCE AGATE BE GATE C GATE FIXTURE CPU CH TYPE usec X Y DEG INCHES INCHES START STOP STOP START STOP STOP ANGLE ANGLE 4 0.00 B 3.66 0.00 0.00 0.8" 0.501 0.150 0 19.74 91 47 79 56 1 0.0" W 3.66 0.00 0.00 0.8" 0.320 0.150 0 6.36 91 -2 45.00 T 13.26 3.00 0.00 0.8" 0.418 0.150 0 13.61 235 7.2- -7.2" 3 60.0' T 14.15 -3.00 0.00 0.8" 0.501 0.150 0 19.74 328 354.0. 6.0" 2 45.00 P1 13.26 3.00 0.00 0.8" 0.341 0.150 0 7.94 235 300.5' 59.5" (ccw)3 60.0&deg; P1 14.15 -3.00 0.00 0.8" 0.383 0.150 0 10.97 328 295.60 64.4" (ccw)2 45.0* P2 1326 3.00 0.00 0.8&deg; 0.341 0.150 0 7.94 235 78.1 -78.1 (cw)3 60.00 P2 14.15 -3.00 0.00 0,8 0.383 0.150 0 10.97 328 47.80 -47.8- (cw)1117/2002 Page I 3:08 PM Noz, W0 GOD-SL6C.xis LaSalle I N4 FEEDWA TER GERIS-2000 NOZZLE-TO-VESSEL SCANNING LIMITS 09/18/00 NOZOD VSLIR WALL WELD RAD ODBR TYPE 25 127 6.69 17.25 4 F (F-FLANGE OR B-BARREL)Delay INDEX INDEX STEP RADIAL DISTANCE AGATE BE GATE C GATE FIXTURE CPU CH TYPE usec X Y DEG INCHES INCHES START STOP STOP START STOP STOP ANGLE ANGLE 1 70.0" T 12,00 0.00 0.00 0.8* 0.387 0.150 0 11.27 54 0.0&deg; 0.0" 2 70.0* P11 12,00 3.00 0.00 0.8* 0.316 0.150 0 6.10 54 287.5" 72.5* (ccw)3 70.0* P2 12M0 -3.00 0.00 0." 0.316 0.150 0 6.10 54 72.5' -72.5* (cw)1/17/2002 Page I 3A10 PM GE NUCLEAR ENERGY UT EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET REPORT NO: 1 R9-026 PROJECT LaSalle Unit 1 -Li R09 WELD ID: LCS-1-N4C SYSTEM: RPV -FEEDWATER INITIAL CALIBRATION ID: NOZ.IN.1, 70RL.IN.1 CALIBRATION VERIFICATIONS:
N4B.2, N4C.1, N4D.70RL.1, N4C.70RL.1 DATA SHEETS: n4c.tI.1, n4c.pl.1, n4c.p2.1, n4c.70ri.1 FINAL CALIBRATION ID: SEE
 
==SUMMARY==
SECTION BELOW MANUAL CALIBRATION:
N/A EXAMINERS:
J. Kent Montgomery, Lv II, Mark Hilborn, Lv II U6tfrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code Section XI, 1989 Edition no Addenda, Category B-D welds and USNRC Reg Guide 1.150 Revision 1 (Alternative Method).Automated 0&deg;, 2.25 L-Wave; 450 and 60* Shear 1.0 MHz and 700 RL 2.0 MHz Transverse and Parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure GE-UT-702 Version 2.Initial calibrations for the 0&deg;, 450 and 600 Shear automated examinations were performed on code vessel block -S/N 91-03.
Calibration for the 70&deg; RL automated examinations were performed on GENE sizing block, SIN -CAL-DPTH-60 ( Refer to G2K-CAL-1 Initial Calibration Summary Sheet).For final automated calibrations and linearities, refer to Calibration Summary Sheet -G2K-CAL-3.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system 0' reference is located 90' CW of nozzle TDC.The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded the following non-relevant indications:
0&deg; L-Wave -Entry Surface Noise, Geometry
-Clad Noise 00 Base Metal -Entry Surface Noise 450 Transverse -Geometry
-Clad Noise, Non-Relevant Reflector, Geometry -Nozzle bore 600 Transverse
-Entry Surface Noise, Geometry -Clad Noise, Non-Relevant Reflector, Geometry -Nozzle Bore 450 Parallel -Geometry -Clad Noise 600 Parallel -Geometry -Clad Noise, Non-Relevant Reflector 70' Transverse
-Entry Surface Noise 700 Parallel -Entry Surface Noise These non-relevant indications were flagged and excluded from the final report.The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded one (1) indication with the 450 Tranverse search unit over 20% DAC which was found to be acceptable.
No other indications requiring evaluation according to ASME B&PV Code Section XI or USNRC Reg Guide 1.150 Revision 1 (Alternative Method) were recorded.Due to nozzle configuration it is not feasible to examine 100% of the ASME Code required volume.Automated 0',45' and 600 UT Coverage = 72.3%. Credit for the 450/600 near field taken with the 700.Automated 70' Near Surface UT Coverage = 44.7%Previous data was reviewed prior to the examination, changes are noted below.The GERIS 2000 Automated system records the complete RF data during scanning, it also utilizes search units with lower frequency elements and improved ultrasonic coupling.
The GERIS 2000 Automated System has shown that with its improvements in examination techniques, indications have better reflectivity with a 1 MHz search unit over a 2.25 MHz., which could explain why this indication was not recorded durinn the prior manual inspection.
EP BY ' REVIE9VED BY DATIE ' 0" // 6ATE ANI4 REVIEW DATE LA SALLE SUMNV.DOC ! C4 PAGE J OF  PAGE I___ Of LaSalle Unit 1 N4C Jan-02 4D 0, 00 WELD METAL N 45&deg; T-SCAN N 600 T-SCAN N N 450 P-SCAN CW N 600 P-SCAN CW N CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE GOVERAGE Area Scanned % of Area Scanned Degrees Scanned % Scanned Area Inch 2  Auto Manual Auto Manual Auto Manual Auto Manual 59.12 31.12 0.0 52.6 0.0 360.0 0.0 52.6 0.0 59,12 47.77 0.0 80.8 0.0 360.0 0.0 80.8 0.0 59.12 50.16 0.0 84.8 0.0 360.0 0.0 84.8 0.0 59.12 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 59.12 37.90 0.0 64.1 0,0 360.0 0.0 64.1 0.0 59.12 47.15 0.0 79.8 0.0 360.0 0.0 79.8 0.0 450 P-SCAN CCW N 59.12 600 P-SCAN CCW N 59.12 37.90 47.15 0.0 0.0 64.1 79.8 0.0 0.0 360.0 360.0 0.0 0.0 64.1 79.8 0.0 0.0* ________ -________
________ _______if 72.3 0.0 Total 00, 450 and 600 Coverage = 72.3 70* T-SCAN N 21.13 11.75 0.0 55.6 0.0 360.0 0.0 55.6 0.0 70* P-SCAN CW N 21.13 8.28 0.0 39.2 0,0 360.0 0.0 39.2 0.0 70* P-SCAN CCW N 21.13 8.28 0.0 39.2 0.0 360.0 0.0 39.2 0.0 44.7 0.0 Total 700 Coverage = 44.7 COMMENTS: Automated UT scans were limited due to the nozzle radius.Credit for the initial 1/4" of material in code coverage taken with the 70&deg;02/29/0'102/29/01 Lasale 1 FEEDWATER Code Required Exam Votume -59.12 Sq.0&deg; L-Wave Exam Volume -31,12 Sq, In, 45* T-Scan Exam Volume -47,77 Sq, In.600 T-Scan Exam Volume 50,16 Sc, In, In, Lasa~Le 1 FEEDWATER Code Required Exam Volume -: 59,12 Sq, In, 45* P-Scan Exam Volume -37.90 Sq, In, 60* P-Scan Exam Volume 47,15 Sco. In, p LasPate 1 FEEDWATER Code Required Exam Volume -26,13 Sq, In, 70&deg; T-Scan Exam Volume -11.75 Sq. In.700 P-Scan Exam Volume 8,25 Sq. In.70&deg;T Noz'i _r(3)GOD-SL6C.xls 09/18/00 LaSalle 1 N4 FEEDWA TER GERIS-2000 NOZZLE-TO-VESSEL SCANNING UMITS NOZOD 25 VSLIR 127 WALL 6.69 WELD RAD 17.25 ODBR 4 TYPE F (F-FLANGE OR B-BARREL)Delay INDEX INDEX STEP RADIAL DISTANCE AGATE BE GATE C GATE FIXTURE CPU CH TYPE usec X Y DEG INCHES INCHES START STOP STOP START STOP STOP ANGLE ANGLE 4 0.00 B 3.66 0.00 0.00 0.8* 0.501 0,150 0 19.74 91 47 79 56 1 0.0* W 3.66 0.00 0.00 0.8&deg; 0.320 0.150 0 6.36 91 --56 2 45.0" T 13.26 3.00 0.00 0.8* 0.418 0,150 0 13.61 235 7.2" -7.2-3 60.0" T 14.15 -3.00 0.00 0.80 0.501 0.150 0 19.74 328 354.0. 6.0*2 45.0&deg; P1 13.26 3.00 0.00 0.8" 0.341 0.150 0 7.94 235 300.5* 59.5" (ccw)3 60.0" P1 14.15 -3.00 0.00 0.81 0.383 0.150 0 10.97 328 295.6' 64.40 (ccw)2 45.00 P2 13.26 3.00 0.00 0.8" 0.341 0.150 0 7.94 235 78.1 -78.1 (cw)3 60.00 P2 14.15 -3.00 0.00 0.8&deg; 0.383 0.150 0 10.97 328 47.80 -47.8- (cw)1/17/2002 Page I 3:08 PM Noz,' i GOD-SL6C.xls LaSalle I N4 FEEDWA TER GERIS-2000 NOZZLE-TO-VESSEL SCANNING LIMITS NOZOD 25 VSLIR 127 WALL 6.69 WELD RAD 17,25 ODBR 4 TYPE F (F-FLANGE OR B-BARREL)09/18/00 Delay INDEX INDEX STEP RADIAL DISTANCE AGATE BE GATE C GATE FIXTURE CPU CH TYPE usec X Y DEG INCHES INCHES START STOP STOP START STOP STOP ANGLE ANGLE 1 70.0&deg; T 12.00 000 0.00 0.8* 0.387 0150 0 11.27 54 0.0&deg; 0.0" 2 70.0&deg; P1 12.00 3.00 0.00 0.8" 0.316 0.150 0 6.10 54 287.5* 72,50 (ccw)3 70.0* P2 1200 -3.00 0.00 0.8&deg; 0.316 0.150 0 6.10 54 72.5" -72,5" (cw)1/17/2002 Page I 3:10 PM GE NUCLEAR ENERGY UT EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET REPORT NO: 1 R9-027 PROJECT LaSalle Unit 1 -L1RO9 WELD ID: LCS-1-N4D SYSTEM: RPV- FEEDWATER INITIAL CALIBRATION ID: NOZ.IN.1, 70RL.IN.1CALIBRATION VERIFICATIONS:
N4D.1, N4C.70RL.1 DATA SHEETS: n4d.tl.1, n4d.tl.2, n4d.pl,1, n4d.pl.2, n4d.p2.1, n4d.70rl.1 FINAL CALIBRATION ID: SEE
 
==SUMMARY==
SECTION BELOW MANUAL CALIBRATION:
N/A EXAMINERS: .J. Kent Montgomery, Lv II, Mark Hilborn, Lv II Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code Section XI, 1989 Edition noAddenda, Category B-D welds and USNRC Reg Guide 1.150 Revision 1 (Alternative Method).Automated 0', 2.25 L-Wave; 450 and 600 Shear 1'0 MHz and 70&deg; RL 2.0 MHz Transverse and Parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure GE-UT-702 Version 2.Initial calibrations for the 0&deg;, 450 and 600 Shear automated examinations were performed on code vessel block -SIN 91-03.
Calibration for the 700 RL automated examinations were performed on GENE sizing block, S/N -CAL-DPTH-60 ( Refer to G2K-CAL-1 Initial Calibration Summary Sheet).For final automated calibrations and linearities, refer to Calibration Summary Sheet -G2K-CAL-3.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system 0' reference is located 90&deg; CW of nozzle TDC.The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded the following non-relevant indications:
0' L-Wave -Entry Surface Noise, Geometry -Clad Noise, Non-Relevant Reflector 45* Transverse
-Geometry -Clad Noise, Non-Relevant Reflector, Geometry -Nozzle bore 600 Transverse
-Geometry -Clad Noise, Non-Relevant Reflector, Geometry -Nozzle Bore 450 Parallel -Geometry -Clad Noise 60o Parallel -Entry Surface Noise, Geometry -Clad Noise 70' Transverse
-Entry Surface Noise, Electrical Noise 700 Parallel -Entry Surface Noise, Electrical Noise These non-relevant indications were flagged and excluded from the final report.The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded three (3) indications with the 450 Tranverse search unit and one (1) indication with the 600 Transverse search unit that were over 20% DAC, all were found to be acceptable.
No indications were recorded over 50% DAC.No other indications requiring evaluation according to ASME B&PV Code Section XI or USNRC Reg Guide 1.150 Revision 1 (Alternative Method) were recorded.Due to nozzle configuration it is not feasible to examine 100% of the ASME Code required volume.Automated 00,450 and 60' UT Coverage = 72.3%Automated 70* Near Surface UT Coverage = 44.7%Credit for the 450/60' near field taken with the 70'.Previous data was reviewed prior to the examination, changes are noted below.The GERIS 2000 Automated system records the complete RF data during scanning, it also utilizes search units with lower frequency elements and improved ultrasonic coupling.
The GERIS 2000 Automated System has shown that with its improvements in examination techniques, indications have better reflectivity with a 1 MHz search unit over a 2.25 MHz., which could explain why this indication was not recorded during the prior manual inspection.
SUMNV.DOC LA SALLE PAGE / OF .,.i ,..,
4.;LaSalle Unit 1 N4D Jan-02 0I N 00 WELD METAL 450 T-SCAN N 60&deg; T-SCAN N N 450 P-SCAN CW 600 P-SCAN CW 45' P-SCAN CCW 60' P-SCAN CCW N N N N CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Area Scanned % of Area Scanned Degrees Scanned % Scanned Area Inch 2  Auto Manual Auto Manual Auto Manual Auto Manual 59.12 31.12 0.0 52.6 0.0 360.0 0.0 52.6 0.0 59.12 47.77 0.0 80.8 0.0 360.0 0.0 808 0.0 59.12 50.16 0.0 84.8 0.0 360.0 0.0 84.8 0.0 59.12 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 59.12 37.90 0.0 64.1 0.0 360.0 0.0 64.1 0.0 59.12 47.15 0.0 79.8 0.0 360.0 0.0 79.8 0.0 59.12 37.90 0.0 64.1 0.0 360.0 0.0 64.1 0.0 59.12 47.15 0.0 79.8 0.0 360.0 0.0 79.8 0.0 72.3 0.0 Total 0', 450 and 60* Coverage 72.3 21.13 11.75 0.0 55.6 0.0 360.0 0.0 55.6 0.0 21.13 8.28 0.0 39.2 0.0 360.0 0.0 39.2 0.0 21.13 8.28 0.0 39.2 0.0 360.0 0.0 39.2 0.0 44.7 0.0 Total 700 Coverage = 44.7 COMMENTS: 70 T-SCAN N 70&deg; P-SCAN CW N 70' P-SCAN CCW N I-I-ni Automated UT scans were limited due to the nozzle radius.ICredit for the initial 1/4" of material in code coveraae taken with the 700 102/29/01 Loasole 1 FEEDWATER Code Required Exam Volume&#xf7;J 59,12 Sq, In, 0* L-Wave Exam Volume -31.12 Sq, In, 45' T-Scn Exam Volume- 47.77 Sq, In, 60" T-Scan Exam Volume 550,16 Sq, In, o ~I-rTl LasacWe 1 FEEPWATER Code Required Exam Volume 45* P-Scan Exam Volume -37 60* P-Scan Exam Volume 47,15 45Q9 I-I m C-)59.12 Sq. In, ,90 Sq, In.Sq, In, Lasctte 1 r-Ir-rTn\
I ATI--F)Er CL UW H I LR\Cocde Required Exam Volume -26,13 Sq. In, 70&deg; T-Scan Exam Volume -11.75 Sq, In, 70* P-Scan Exam Volume 8,25 Sq, In, 70&deg;T NoziR(3)GOD-SL6C.xls 09/18/00 LaSalle 1 N4 FEED WA TER GERIS-2000 NOZZLE-TO-VESSEL SCANNING LIMITS NOZOD 25 VSLIR 127 WALL 6.69 WELD RAD 17.25 ODBR 4 TYPE F (F-FLANGE OR B-BARREL)Delay INDEX INDEX STEP RADIAL DISTANCE AGATE BE GATE C GATE FIXTURE CPU CH TYPE usec X Y DEG INCHES INCHES START STOP STOP START STOP STOP ANGLE ANGLE 4 0,0* B 3.66 0.00 0,00 0.8' 0.501 0.150 0 19.74 91 47 79 56 1 0.0&deg; W 3.66 0.00 0.00 0.8' 0.320 0:150 0 6.36 91 --56 -2 45.0' T 13.26 3.00 0.00 0.8* 0.418 0.150 0 13.61 235 -7.2' -7.2'3 60.0&deg; T 14.15 -3,00 0.00 0.8&deg; 0.501 0.150 0 19.74 328 354.0' 6.0'2 45.0' P1 13.26 3.00 0.00 0.8' 0.341 0.150 0 7.94 235 300.5' 59.5' (ccw)3 60.0' P1 14.15 -3.00 0.00 0.8&deg; 0.383 0,150 0 10.97 328 295.6' 64.4* (ccw)2 45.0' P2 13.26 3.00 0.00 0.8' 0.341 0.150 0 7.94 235 78.1' -78.1' (cw)3 60.0' P2 14.15 -3.00 0.00 0.8' 0.383 0.150 0 10.97 328 47.8' -47.8' (cw)I 1/17/2002 Page I 3:08 PM Nou 10GOD-SL6C.xls LaSalle I N4 FEED WA TER GERIS-2000 NOZZLE- TO- VESSEL SCANNING LIMITS NOZOD 25 VSLIR 127 09/18/00 WALL WELD RAD ODBR TYPE 6.69 17.25 4 F (F-FLANGE OR B-BARREL)
Delay INDEX INDEX STEP RADIAL DISTANCE AGATE BE GATE C GATE FIXTURE CPU CH TYPE usec X Y DEG INCHES INCHES START STOP STOP START STOP STOP ANGLE ANGLE 1 70.0" T 12.00 0.00 0.00 0.8* 0.387 0.150 0 11.27 54 00 0.0 (ccw 2 70.0" P1 12.00 3.00 0.00 0.8" 0.316 0.150 0 6.10 54 287,5" 72.5" cw 3 70,0* P2 12.00 -3.00 0.00 0.8* 0.316 0.150 0 6.10 54 -72.5" -72.5" (cw)'-I 1/17/2002 Page 1 3:10 PM GE NUCLEAR ENERGY UT EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET REPORT NO: 1 R9-028 PROJECT LaSalle Unit 1 -L1 R09 WELD ID: LCS-1-N4E SYSTEM: RPV- FEEDWATER INITIAL CALIBRATION ID: NOZIN1, 70RL.IN.1 CALIBRATION VERIFICATIONS:
N4D.1, N4E.1, N4F.1, N4E.70RL.1, N4F.70RL.1 DATA SHEETS: n4e.tl.1, n4e.tl.2, n4e.tl.3, n4e.tL.4, n4e.pl.1, n4e.p2.1, n4e.70rl.1 FINAL CALIBRATION ID: SEE
 
==SUMMARY==
SECTION BELOW MANUAL CALIBRATION:
N/A ,EXAMINERS:,, J. Kent Montgomery, Lv II, Mark Hilborn, Lv II Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code Section Xl, 1989 Edition noAddenda, Category B-D welds and USNRC Reg Guide 1.150 Revision 1 (Alternative Method).Automated 00, 2.25 L-Wave; 450 and 60* Shear 1.0 MHz and 70&deg; RL 2.0 MHz Transverse and Parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure GE-UT-702 Version 2.Initial calibrations for the 0&deg;, 450 and 60* Shear automated examinations were performed on code vessel block -SIN 91-03.
Calibration for the 700 RL automated examinations were performed on GENE sizing block, S/N -CAL-DPTH-60 ( Refer to G2K-CAL-1 Initial Calibration Summary Sheet).For final automated calibrations and linearities, refer to Calibration Summary Sheet -G2K-CAL-3.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system 00 reference is located 900 CW of nozzle TDC.The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded the following non-relevant indications:
0&deg; Base Metal -Geometry -Clad Noise, Non-Relevant Reflector 450 Transverse
-Geometry -Clad Noise, Non-Relevant Reflector 600 Transverse
-Geometry -Clad Noise, Non-Relevant Reflector, Geometry -Nozzle Bore 450 Parallel -Geometry -Clad Noise, Entry Surface Noise 600 Parallel -Entry Surface Noise, Geometry
-Clad Noise, Non-Relevant Reflector 70&deg; Transverse
-Entry Surface Noise, Non-Relevant Reflector 70&deg; Parallel -Entry Surface Noise These non-relevant indications were flagged and excluded from the final report.The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded one (1) indication with the 450 Tranverse search unit over 20% DAC which was found to be acceptable.
No other indications requiring evaluation according to ASME B&PV Code Section Xl or USNRC Reg Guide 1.150 Revision I (Alternative Method) were recorded.Due to nozzle configuration it is not feasible to examine 100% of the ASME Code required volume.Automated 00,450 and 600 UT Coverage = 72.3%. Credit for the 450/600 near field taken with the 70&deg;.Automated 70* Near Surface UT Coverage = 44.7%Previous data was reviewed prior to the examination, changes are noted below.The GERIS 2000 Automated system records the complete RF data during scanning, it also utilizes search units with lower frequency elements and improved ultrasonic coupling.
The GERIS 2000 Automated System has shown that with its improvements in examination techniques, indications have better reflectivity with a 1 MHz search unit over a 2.25 MHz., which could explain why this indication was not recorded during the prior manual inspection.
II LA SALLE SUMNV.DOC R cl PAGE 1 OF 32 LaSalle Unit I N4E Jan-02 0 0&deg; WELD METAL N 450 T-SCAN N 60' T-SCAN N N 45" P-SCAN CW N 600 P-SCAN CW N 450 P-SCAN CCW N 600 P-SCAN CCW NCODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Area Scanned % of Area Scanned Degrees Scanned % Scanned Area Inch 2  Auto Manual Auto Manual Auto Manual Auto Manual 59.12 31.12 0.0 52.6 0.0 360.0 0.0 52.6 0.0 59.12 47.77 0.0 80.8 0.0 360.0 0.0 80.8 0.0 59.12 50.16 0.0 84.8 0.0 360.0 0.0 84.8 0.0 59.12 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 59.12 37.90 0.0 64.1 0.0 360.0 0.0 64.1 0.0 59.12 47.15 0.0 79.8 0.0 360.0 0.0 79.8 0.0 59.12 37.90 0.0 64.1 0.0 360.0 0.0 64.1 0.0 59.12 47.15 0.0 79.8 0.0 360.0 0.0 79.8 0.0 72.3 0.0 Total 0&deg;, 45&deg; and 600 Coverage = 72.3 700 T-SCAN N 21.13 11.75 0.0 55.6 0.0 360.0 0.0 55.6 70' P-SCAN CW N 21.13 8.28 0.0 39.2 0.0 360.0 0.0 39.2 70&deg; P-SCAN CCW N 21.13 8.28 0.0 39.2 0.0 360.0 0.0 392 0,0 0.0 AN 44.7 0_0 Total 700 Coverage = 44.7 COMMENTS: Automated UT scans were limited due to the nozzle radius.Credit for the initial 114" of material in code coverage taken with the 70&deg;1 02/29/01 2 700 &deg; 0 1800 H4-Thermocouptes T-Scan0 Start o lu- 80 Stop Lascde 1 FEEDWATER 600 T-Scan Exam Volume 50,16 Sq, In, 60&deg; T-Scan Exam Limited to 16,05" from 1080 to 800 'due to thermocouples on vessel wall 600 T-Scan Exam Volume was not limited 16.05'CCW I I I I 1-~ T)c-i,.-7.IN (1.
LcasscLRe 1 FEEDWATER Codie Required Exam Volume -59.12 Sq. In, 0&deg; L-W ve Exam Volume -31.12 So. In, 45* T-Scan Exam Volume -47.77 Sq.60&deg; T-Scon Exam Volume 50,16 Sq, In, LascWte 1 FEEDWATER Code Required Exam Volume -59.12 Sq, In, 45" P-Scan Exam Volume -37.90 Sq. In, 60&deg; P-Sccin Exom Volume 47,15 So, In,................
!
Lasacle 1 FEEDWATER Code Required Exam Volume -26.13 Sq, 700 T-Scan Exam Volume -11.75 Sq. In, 700 P-Scan Exam Volrume 8,25 Sq. In.In, 70&deg;T Noz,_IR(3)
GOD-SL6C.xIs 09/18/00 LaSalle 1 N4 FEEDWA TER GERIS-2000 NOZZLE-TO-VESSEL SCANNING LIMITS NOZOD VSLIR WALL WELD RAD ODBR TYPE 25 127 6.69 17.25 4 F (F-FLANGE OR B-BARREL)Delay INDEX INDEX STEP RADIAL DISTANCE AGATE BE GATE C GATE FIXTURE CPU CH TYPE usec X Y DEG INCHES INCHES START STOP STOP START STOP STOP ANGLE ANGLE 4 0.0" B 3.66 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.501 0.150 0 19.74 91 47 79 56 1 0.00 W 3.66 0.00 0.00 0.8" 0.320 0.150 0 6.36 91 --56 -2 45.0&deg; T 13.26 3.00 0.00 0.8&deg; 0.418 .0.150 0 13.61 235 -7.22 -7.2'3 60.00 T 14.15 -3.00 0.00 0.8" 0.501 0.150 0 19.74 328 354.0' 6.0&deg;2 45.0' P1 13.26 3.00 0.00 0.8' 0.341 0.150 0 7.94 *235 300.5' 59.5' (ccw)3 60.0' P1 14,15 -3.00 0.00 0.8" 0.383 0.150 0 10.97 328 295.6' 64.4' (ccw)2 45.0" P2 13.26 3.00 0.00 0.8&deg; 0.341 0.150 0 7.94 235 781&deg; -78.1' (cw)3 60.0' P2 14.15 -3.00 0.00 0.8' 0.383 0.150 0 10.97 328 47,80 -47.8' (cw)1117/2002 Page I 3:08 PM Noi i0 GOD-SL6C.xls LaSalle IN4 FEEDWA TER GERIS-2000 NOZZLE-TO-VESSEL SCANNING LIMITS NOZOD 25 VSLIR 127 WALL 6.69 WELD RAD 1725 ODBR , 4 TYPE F (F-FLANGE OR B-BARREL)09118/00 Delay INDEX INDEX STEP RADIAL DISTANCE AGATE BE GATE C GATE FIXTURE CPU CH TYPE usec X Y DEG INCHES INCHES START STOP STOP START STOP STOP ANGLE ANGLE 1 70.0&deg; T 12.00 0.00 0.00 0.8" 0.387 0.150 0 11.27 54 0.0&deg; 0,0" 2 70.0* P1 12.00 3.00 0.00 0.8&deg; 0.316 0.150 0 6.10 54 287.50 72.5&deg; (ccw)3 70.00 P2 12.00 -3.00 0.00 0.8" 0.316 0.150 0 6.10 54 72.50 -72.5' (cw)U, 1/17/2002 Page 1 3:10 PM GE NUCLEAR ENERGY UT EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET REPORT NO: 1R9-029 PROJECT LaSalle Unit 1 -L1RO9 WELD ID: LCS-1-N4F SYSTEM: RPV -FEEDWATER INITIAL CALIBRATION ID: NOZ.IN.1, 70RL.IN.1 CALIBRATION VERIFICATIONS:
N4F.1, N4A.1, N4F.70RL.1, N4A.70RL.1 DATA SHEETS: n4f.tl.2, n4f.pl.2, n4f.p2.1, n4f.70r1.1 FINAL CALIBRATION ID: SEE
 
==SUMMARY==
SECTION BELOW MANUAL CALIBRATION:
N/A E.MINERS:....
J. Kent Montgomery, Lv II, Mark Hilborn Lv II Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code Section XI, 1989 Edition noAddenda, Category B-D welds and USNRC Reg Guide
: 1. 150 Revision 1 (Alternative Method).
Automated 0*, 2.25 L-Wave; 450 and 60&deg; Shear 1.0 MHz and 70&deg; RL 2.0 MHz Transverse and Parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure GE-UT-702 Version 2.Initial calibrations for the 0&deg;, 45* and 60' Shear automated examinations were performed on code vessel block -SIN 91-03.
Calibration for the 70* RL automated examinations were performed on GENE sizing block, S/N -CAL-DPTH-60 ( Refer to G2K-CAL-1 Initial Calibration Summary Sheet).For final automated calibrations and linearities, refer to Calibration Summary Sheet -G2K-CAL-3.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system 00 reference is located 900 CW of nozzle TDC.The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded the following non-relevant indications:
0&deg; Weld Metal -Geometry -Clad Noise, Non-Relevant Reflector 450 Transverse
-Geometry -Clad Noise, Non-Relevant Reflector 560 Transverse
-Geometry -Clad Noise, Non-Relevant Reflector, Geometry -Nozzle Bore 456 Parallel -Geometry -Clad Noise 60' Parallel -Entry Surface Noise, Geometry
-Clad Noise 700 Transverse
-Entry Surface Noise, Non-Relevant Reflector 700 Parallel -Entry Surface Noise, Non-Relevant Reflector These non-relevant indications were flagged and excluded from the final report.The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded one (1) indication with the 700 Tranverse search unit over 20% DAC which was found to be acceptable.
No other indications requiring evaluation according to ASME B&PV Code Section Xl or USNRC Reg Guide 1.150 Revision 1 (Alternative Method) were recorded.
Due to nozzle configuration it is not feasible to examine 100% of the ASME Code required volume.Automated 0*,450 and 600 UT Coverage = 72.3%. Credit for the 450/600 near field taken with the 70'.Automated 700 Near Surface UT Coverage = 44.7%Previous data was reviewed prior to the examination, changes are noted below.There was no previous 70* Near Surface data to review or compare.&#xfd;REPARED BY DATE RE"A uBY DATE j DATE ANI[REVIEW DATE SUMNV.DC LA SALLE I "V-L LaSalle Unit I N4F Jan-02 2 6.)wo.0 0O WELD METAL N 450 T-SCAN N 600 T-SCAN N N 450 P-SCAN CW N 600 P-SCAN CW N 450 P-SCAN CCW N 60" P-SCAN COW N 700 T-SCAN N 70' P-SCAN CW N 700 P-SCAN CCW N CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Area Scanned % of Area Scanned Degrees Scanned % Scanned Area Inch2 Auto Manual Auto Manual Auto Manual Auto Manual 59.12 31.12 0.0 52.6 0.0 360.0 0.0 52.6 0.0 59.12 47.77 0.0 80.8 0.0 360.0 0.0 80.8 0.0 59.12 50.16 0.0 84.8 0.0 360.0 0.0 84.8 0.0 59.12 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 59.12 37.90 0.0 64.1 0.0 360.0 0.0 64.1 0.0 59.12 47.15 0.0 79.8 0.0 360.0 0.0 79.8 0.0 59.12 37.90 0.0 64.1 0.0 360.0 0.0 64.1 0.0 59.12 47.15 0.0 .79.8 0.0 360.0 0.0 79.8 0.0 72.3 0.0 Total 0&deg;, 450 and 600 Coverage = 72.3 21.13 11.75 0.0 55.6 0.0 360.0 0.0 55.6 0.0 21.13 8.28 0.0 39.2 0.0 360.0 0.0 39.2 0.0 21.13 8.28 0.0 39.2 0.0 360.0 0.0 39.2 0.0 44.7 0.0 Total 700 Coverage = 44.7 COMMENTS: o -;l~utomatea U I scans were limirea aue to me nozzle radius.Credit for the initial 1/4" of material in code coverage taken with the 70&deg;I 1/LascW~e 1 FEEDWATER V Code Required Exam Volume -. 59.12 Sq, In, 0* L-Wave Exam Volume -31.12 Sq, In, 45&deg; T-Scan Exam Volume -47.77 Sq, In, 60&deg; T-Scan Exam Volume 50,16 Sq, In, Lasole 1 FEEDWATER Code Required Exam Volume 26,13 Sq. In, 70&deg; T-Scan Exam Volume -11.75 Sq. In, 70&deg; P-Scan Exam Volume 8,25 So, In, I 70&deg;T Noz- ri(3)GOD-SL6C.xls LaSalle 1 N4 FEED WA TER GERIS-2000 NOZZLE-TO-VESSEL SCANNING LIMITS NOZOD 25 VSLIR 127 WALL 6.69 WELD RAD 17.25 ODBR 4 TYPE F (F-FLANGE OR B-BARREL)09/18/00 Delay INDEX INDEX STEP RADIAL DISTANCE AGATE BE GATE C GATE FIXTURE CPU CH TYPE usec X Y DEG INCHES INCHES START STOP STOP START STOP STOP ANGLE ANGLE 4 0.0' B 3.66 0.00 0.00 0,8' 0.501 0,150 0 19.74 91 47 79 56 1 0.0* W 3.66 0.00 0.00 0.8&deg; 0.320 0.150 0 6,36 91 --56 -2 45.0" T 13.26 3.00 0,00 0.8" 0.418 0.150 0 13.61 235 -7.20 -7.2" 3 60.00 T 14.15 -3.00 0.00 0.8 0.501 0.150 0 19.74 328 -354.00 6.0&deg;2 45,0* P1 13.26 3.00 0.00 0.8" 0.341 0.150 0 7.94 235 -300.50 59.50 (ccw)3 60,00 P1 14.15 -3.00 0.00 0.8" 0.383 0.150 0 10.97 328 -295.60 64.4" (ccw)2 45.00 P2 13.26 3.00 0.00 0.8&deg; 0.341 0.150 0 7.94 235 -78.1 -78.1 (cw)3 60.00 P2 14.15 -3.00 0.00 0.81 0.383 0.150 0 10.97 328 -47.8* -47.8- (cw)1/17/2002 Page 1 NoZ , i0 GOD-SL6C.xls LaSalle I N4 FEED WA TER GERIS-2000 NOZZLE-TO-VESSEL SCANNING LIMITS NOZOD 25 VSLIR 127 WALL 6.69 WELD RAD 17.25 ODBR 4 TYPE F (F-FLANGE OR B-BARREL)09/18/00 Delay INDEX INDEX STEP RADIAL DISTANCE AGATE BE GATE C GATE FIXTURE CPU CH TYPE usec X Y DEG INCHES INCHES START STOP STOP START STOP STOP ANGLE ANGLE 1 70.0' T 12.00 0.00 0.00 0.8&deg; 0.387 0.150 0 11.27 54 0.0&deg; 0,0&deg;2 70.0&deg; P1 12.00 3.00 0.00 0.8' 0,316 0.150 0 6.10 54 287.5&deg; 72.5&deg; (ccw)3 70&#xfd;0&deg; P2 12,00 -3.00 0.00 0.8&deg; 0.316 0.150 0 6.10 54 72.5* -725&deg; (cw)1/17/2002 Page 1&#xfd;. A^ --
Report No.: G EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET 1R9-136 GE NUCLEAR ENERGY Site and Unit: LaSalle Component ID: IRH-HXI B-08A Outage: LI R09 I Lun System: RHR ASME Cat.: C-C ASME Item C3.10 Aug Requirements:
N/A Exams Performed Data Sheet Cal Sheet Procedure Calibration Block Examination Cert Level Date Personnel N/A MT-001 N/A MT-EXLN-102 N/A JudithOusley II 01/11/2002 Examination Results: During the magnetic particle examination of the above referenced weld, no indications were recorded.
76% of the code required surface area was examined.This examination meets the requirements of ASME Section Xl, 1989 Edition, no Addenda.Examination results were compared to data report D579 from 1989 outage with E No Change These examinations were perforned under Work Order: 99270178 0 Change This Summary and the following data sheets have been reviewed and accepted by thp following personnel:
",/-/3-l. ( ;< z' -wP: 868__-/3- __ --- /. ' J i Dose: N/A mr.Prpaed., Level: Date: Utility Reviewed By: / Title: Date: Reviewed By: Level: Date: ANII Reviewed By: Title: Date: Page 1 of 3 Weld No.: IRH-HXIB-08A Configuration:
Drawing: GEL-1104 System: Procedure No.: MT-EXLN-102 Version / Revision Material:
Surface Condition:
Item: Carbon Steel Ground Weld. Fin Magnetizing Apparatus Mfg: Parker Research Yoke Calibration:
AC -10 lb. Lift Model: Probe B300 Serial No. 8164 Yoke Spacing: 6.Thermometer:
218052 Surface Tern I LuO al Black Ligh Model It Blacklight N/A Light Meter N/A perature:
60' F Serial Number NIA N/A Technique Magnetization:
AC Technique:
Continuous Examination Medium Magnetic Particles:
Dry Magnaflux 8A Red Manufacturer:
Particle Type: Blacklight Intensity N/A Biacklight Intensity:
93A045 Batch No LI 01/1112002 Level Date e a-t3-oz-Level Date Page , of GE Inspection Services GE Ispetio $erlce Was IRH-HXIB4-A,9A
& I OA/
Q GE NUCLEAR ENERGY UT EXAMINA TION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET Summary No; P,11 -025 PROJECT LaSaife Unit 1. L I R I WELD ID: GEL- O09-AG 73p Hd to F'aigje SYSTEM: RFV CALIBRATION ID: ,N&#xfd;A Manual DATA: UT-021,022,023, and 024 OPERATORS:
S h,-kkon Lv Vr, T Girider Ultrasornic examination results were acceprable to the requirements of AWME R&PV Codie Sctkin XI, 1989 Edilfon no Acdenda also Section x)I, i95 Edition wth the 199A6/ddenda as modified by the PFD. progrm description arnd !he Federal Reqsler, Pail 1;, Nuclear Reguiatoiy Ccrrmission, 10 CF&sect;R Part ,O foto Category B-A R.(.adcr Pres55ste Vessel ?RPV)Assembly Welds.Manual transverse and paralle! scans were oerfor-med frcm'the vessel 00) surface in 3czordance
'with procedure GE-UT- 300 V 10. using 601R 9L search units.Manual parallel scanning was iestficted due ro the Flarge tc weld confiqLrat0on The manual exams recorded no indications, Pre-vous data was (viewed with no significant changes.Manual UT e coveraqe = 49c Magnetic Particle examination was performed in acccrdarinc, with procedure GE. MT-100 V'6. data ,le'ts -MT,006 and MT.-O7O T. tere were no recordatle indicallis 1,I% of the required area was exammed ,i 7'f/*1 YA4 6V &#xfd;Af-REVIE WED 9Y CA TE I UTILITY REVIEW OATE#1/2 ANI EIE ATE La Sile U, t Ri 1 ae/c Page.-I D&#xfd; '?
cb R~portNo.
1Ri~-G2~Report No, I R 11" -025&#xa3;4 I'LaSaile Unit-1 GEL- 1009-AG Spring 2006 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Percent -Weld Length = 791. Required Exam Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Porcent Exam Volume z 22.2 Area Sq. In. Manual Manual Manual Manual 60' NS T-Scar. A 7.9 ".9 356% 3955 ../60; S6 T-Scan A 1 11 49.5% 395.5 124%60- S4 T-Scan A 3.3 13. 14.9% " 3G55 60' NS P-Scan A 79 T4 33 3% 395.5 8. 3%," 60* S6 P-S&an A 11 104 468% 395.5 11.7%60' S4 P-Scan A 3.3 3. 14 0% 395 5 3 5t 60 NS T-Scan __'_. .. ........ _ _60" S6 T-Scan ........ .F3'0 " 4T-Scan -...L, I. .eI 60' NS P-Scan -______60' N6 P-Scan .. .... .._ __.........P-Scan _ ..... ......Comen~ A- ~sm~dacessbl wed enghfrm 1O~cw o 6O ? :,~L & Jl m V/.0 1~~0% Total Composite Coverage =49%B -P-Scan restriced due to weld to flange configuraton.-- IRL-tncjfl,9 methcos may affect calculated vaiies, .
( LaSalle Unit 1 Flange to Top Head 6r60 NS Exam Volume = 7.9 Sq. In.60" FV S6 Exam Volume = 11.0 Sq. In.6o 60 V S4 Exam Volume = 3.3 Sq. In.r 60N 1S T-Scan achieved = 7.9 Sq. In.60 F'V S6 T-Scan achieved = 11.0 Sq. in.60r FV S4 T-Scan achieved = 3.3 Sq. In.60 NS P-Scan achieved = 7.4 Sq. In.60" FV S6 P-Scan achieved = 10.4 Sq. In.60r FV S4 P-Scan achieved = 3.1 Sq. In.1.6 WT WT 3.0 V '
GE Nuclear Energy MAGNETIC PARTICLE EXAMINATION REPORT Site: LaSalle Station Unit: 1 Project: LIRII Report Number: 1RII-025 Sheet No.: MT-006 Weld No.: GEL-1009-AG Configuration:
Top Head -Flanme Drawing: GEL-1009 System: RPV Procedure No.: GE-MT-100 Version I Revision:
V6 DRR: N/A Material:
Surface Condition:
Item: Carbon Steel Cleaned Weld -Final Magnetizing Apparatus Black Light Mfg: Parker Research Yoke Calibration:
2015106 Model Serial Number Model: B-300 Blacklight:
N/A N/A Serial No. 5522 Yoke Spacing: 3"-6" Light Meter: N/A N/A Thermometer:
246434 Surface Temperature:
87&deg; F Technique Examination Medium Blacklight Intensity Magnetization:
AC Magnetic Particles:
Dry N/A Technique:
Continuous Parker Research RP-6 11793 Blacklight Intensity:
Manufacturer Particle Type: Batch No.: Indication Number
 
== Description:==
 
Resuls:--2_
-R I ------ --- ------ --Comments: Inspected from 1800 to 2700 Azimuth.No recordable indications.
Clay Suhler II 2/2200 Utility Review Date .Initia E/ainer Level Date GE Review Level De ANII Review Date Page of 7 GE Nuclear Energy MAGNETIC PARTICLE EXAMINATION REPORT Site: LaSalle Station Unit: I Project: LIR1I Report Number: IRII-025 Sheet No.: MT-007 Weld No.: GEL-1009-AG Configuration:
Too Head- Flange Drawing: GEL-1009 System: RPV Procedure No.: GE-MT-100 Version I Revision:
V6 DRR: N/A Material:
Surface Condition:
Item: Carbon Steel Cleaned Weld- Final Magnetizing Apparatus Black Light Mfg: Parker Research Yoke Calibration:
2115/06 Model Serial Number Model: B-300 Blacklight:
N/A N/A Serial No. 8164 Yoke Spacing: 3"" Light Meter: N/A N/A Thermometer:
246434 Surface Temperature:
67&deg; F Technique Examination Medium Blacklight Intensity Magnetization:
AC Magnetic Particles:
Dry N/A Technique:
Continuous Parker Research RP-6 11793 Blacklight Intensity:
Manufacturer Particle Type: Batch No.: Comments: Inspected from 270&deg; to 360&deg; Azimuth.No recordable indications.
Alan Kel/2v Utility.Revie.
Date Initial Level Date -GE Review Level Date ANII Review Date Page 7 of
~GE NUCLEAR ENERGY UT EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET Summary No: 1 R 11-007 PROJECT LaSalle Unit 1, L1RlI WELD ID: GEL-1006-AJ
-Bottom Hd. Circumferential WeldSYSTEM: RPV CALIBRATION ID: N/AMANUAL DATA:
UT-061, 062, 063, 064 OPERATORS:
W. Reid Lv II, S. Snyder Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code Section XI, 1989 Edition no Addenda, and Section XI, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PDI program description and the Federal Register, Part II, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 50 for Category B-A Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) Assembly Welds.
Manual transverse and parallel scans were performed from the vessel OD surface in accordance with procedure GE-UT-300 V10; using 60' RL search units.Manual scanning was performed from the top side only, T-scans and P-scans were restricted due to the RPV vessel skirt.The manual exams recorded no indications.
Previous data was reviewed with no significant changes.Manual UT composite coverage
= 19 %REPARED BY DATE REVIEWED BY DATE UTILITY REVIEW7 DATE ANII REVIEW DATE T Level: UT Level: LaSalle Unit-i, Li Ri 1, 2006 , Page 1 
,!w /* 0' 16.Report No. 1R11-9ft5-0o07 LaSalle Unit-1 GEL-1006-AJ Bott. Hd. Circ. Weld Spring 2006 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Percent Weld Length = 657.3 Required Exam Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent Exam Volume = 36.5 Area Sq. In. Manual Manual Manual Manual 600 NS T-Scan A 11.3 -2.3 6.3% 328.6 1.6%60&deg; S6 T-Scan A 19.9 13.3 36.4% 328.6 9.1%600 S4 T-Scan A 5.3 + 5.2 14.2% 328.6 3.6%600 NS P-Scan A 11.3 1.6 4.4% 328.6 1.1%60" S6 P-Scan A 19.9 4.1 11.2% 328.6 2.8%600 S4 P-Scan A 5.3 1.1 3.0% 328.6 0.8%600 NS T-Scan 600 S6 T-Scan 600 S4 T-Scan 60' NS P-Scan 600 S6 P-Scan 600 S4 P-Scan iIJ _% Total Composite Coverage =19%Comments:
A -Examined accessible weld length from 1800 cw to 3600 top side only, T-scans and P-scans were limited due to the RPV vessel skirt.Note -Rounding methods may affect calculated values.
600 NS Exam Volume= 11.3 Sq. In. LaSalle Unit 1 60' FV S6 Exam Volume = 19.9 Sq. In.600 FV S4 Exam Volume = 5.3 Sq. In. Bottom Head (AJ)Circ. Weld 600 NS T-Scan achieved = 2.3 Sq. In.600 FV S6 T-Scan achieved = 13.3 Sq. In.60' FV S4 T-Scan achieved = 5.2 Sq. In.60' NS P-Scan achieved = 1.6 Sq. In.600 FV S6 P-Scan achieved = 4.1 Sq. In.60&deg; FV S4 P-Scan achieved = 1.1 Sq. In.600TIP 60 0 T I 2~)
0GE NUCLEAR ENERGY UT EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET REPORT NO: 1 Rl1-003 PROJECT LaSalle Unit 1 -L1Rl1 WELD ID: LCS BG SYSTEM: RPV INITIAL CALIBRATION ID: VES.91.1N.1 (L1RO9)FINAL CALIBRATION ID: VES.91.OUT.1 (L1RO9)GERIS DATA: (See weld LCS-1-BG reports from L1RO9)
MANUAL CALIBRATION:
N/A MANUAL DATA: N/A Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code, Section XI, 1989 Edition NoAddenda, Category B-A Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) Assembly Welds.Automated 0', 2.25 MHz Weld and Base Metal, 45&deg;S, 1.0 MHz, 601L, 2.0 MHz and 70&deg;RL, 2.0 MHz Transverse and Parallel scans were performed per the requirements of procedure GE-UT-704 V4, in accordance with Appendix VIII.Automated scanning was restricted on both sides of "BG" due to Instrumentation Nozzle N12-A.These examinations were performed during the L1R09 outage in 2002 which did not permit single side coverage.Reevaluation of this recorded data was performed in accordance with procedure GE-UT-704 V8 which is qualified for single sided access. The coverage was recalculated and resulted in an increase in coverage of 9.2%, taking the coverage from 66.1% to 75.3%Automated UT Composite Coverage = 75.3%GERIS 2000 Software Revision 5.26 was used for aquisition and analysis.II Li LaSalle Unit 1, L1R11, 2006 Page I of Z Summary No.: lRll-003 LaSalle Unit-1 LCS-1 -BG ASpring 2006 N-CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA LENGTH CALCULATIONS Percent Weld Length = 109.38 Required Exam Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent Exam Volume = 52.69 Area Sq. In. Auto Auto Auto Auto 700 T-Scan A 8.38 8.38 15.9% 83.88 6.1%450 T-Scan A 36.25 36.25 68.8% 83.88 26.4%600 T-Scan A 8.06 8,06 15.3% 64.63 4.5%700 P-Scan A 8.38 8.38 15.9% 83.88 6.1%450 P-Scan A 36.25 36.25 68.8% 83.88 26.4%600 P-Scan A 8.06 8.06 15.3% 64.63 4.5%70' T-Scan 450 T-Scan 600 T-Scan B 8.06 4.03 7.6% 19.25 0.7%700 P-Scan 450 P-Scan 60&deg; P-Scan B 8.06 4.03 7.6% 19.25 0.7%70' T-Scan 450 T-Scan 600 T-Scan 700 P-Scan 450 P-Scan 600 P-Scan-/o I otal G~omposit koverage=/ b.3V Comments:
A -Examined accessible length. Weld length reduced by 3.0" due to the N12-A instrumentation nozzle.B -Automated exam restricted due to the proximity of the N12-A nozzle pad.
Note -Rounding methods may affect calculated values.
GE NUCLEAR ENERGY UT EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET REPORT NO: 1R9-010 PROJECT LaSalle Unit 1 -L1RO9 WELD ID: LCS BG SYSTEM: RPV INITIAL CALIBRATION ID: VES.9 1.IN. 1 CALIBRATION VERIFICATIONS:
BM. 1 FINAL CALIBRATION ID: VES.91.OUT.1 GERIS DATA: bgr.1, bgr.2, bgl.1, bgl.6, bgl.7, bgl.8.....: A L N/A.MANUJAL tALIRATINNA MANUAL DATA: N/A Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code, Section XI, 1989 Edition No Addenda, Category B-A Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) Assembly Welds.Automated 0', 2.25 MHz Weld and Base Metal, 45&deg;S, 1.0 MHz, 60 0 L, 2.0 MHz and 70&deg;RL, 2.0 MHz Transverse and Parallel scans were performed per the requirements of procedure GE-UT-704 V4, in accordance with Appendix VIII.The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded the following indications:
00 Weld Metal -No Recordable Indications 450 Transverse -No Recordable Indications 600 Transverse
-No Recordable Indications 700 Transverse
-No Recordable Indications 45&deg; Parallel -No Recordable Indications 600 Parallel -No Recordable Indications 70' Parallel -No Recordable Indications Plate segregates on both sides of weld "BG" were observed.Automated scanning was restricted on both sides of "BG" due to Instrumentation Nozzle N 12-A.Previous examination results were reviewed and there are no changes.Automated UT Composite Coverage
= 66.1%GERIS 2000 Software Revision 5.26 was used for aquisition and analysis.( REPARED BY REVI WED BY UTILITY REVIEW ANII REVIEW-ATE 7 0 DATE 0 DATE DATE SUMNV.DOC LA SALLE I I K ("~I PAC / It, Y= 459.50 BE Area Scanned Y= 390.00 Y= 349.50 Area not scanned on left side 40,5'454I,683 34 2,2 5 N12-A Y= 332,25 Y= 464.00 454,63" BN N12-Ar Ar'ea Sca~nned N6-A Y= 378.00 Areoa 47,75 not scanned on right side 342,25" (LaSalle Unit-1 Weld BG Jan-02 Weld Length 112.38CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE (Area Scanned% of Area Scanned IWeld Length Scanned% Scanned 0 Area Inch 2  Auto Manual Auto Manual Auto Manual Auto Manual RIGHT SIDE 70: T-SCAN N/A 8.38 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 RIGHT SIDE 45 T-SCAN N/A 36.25 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0RIGHT SIDE 60 T-SCAN N/A 8.06 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 70R P-SCAN UP N/A 8.38 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 450 P-SCAN UP N/A 36.25 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 60&deg; P-SCAN UP N/A 8.06 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Unrestricted Scans LEFT SIDE 70* T-SCAN N/A 8.38 8.38 0.00 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LEFT SIDE 45* T-SCAN N/A 36.25 36.25 0.00 100.0 00 00 0.0 0.0 0.0LEFT SIDE 60 T-SCAN N/A 8.06 8.06 0.00 100,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 70* P-SCAN DOWN N/A 8.38 8.38 0.00 100,0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 45* P-SCAN DOWN N/A 36.25 36.25 0.00 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 60* P-SCAN DOWN N/A 806 8.06 0.00 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0&#xfd;0Restricted ScansRIGHT SIDE 70 T-SCAN Y 8.38 8.38 0.00 100.0 0.0 76.63 0.0 10.8 0.0RIGHT SIDE 45* T-SCAN Y 36.25 36,25 0.00 100.0 0.0 76.63 0.0 46.9 0.0RIGHT SIDE 60 T-SCAN Y 8.06 8.06 0.00 100.0 0.0 76.63 0.0 10.4 0.0 70&deg; P-SCAN UP Y 8.38 8.38 0.00 100.0 0.0 76.63 0,0 10.8 0.0 45&deg; P-SCAN UP Y 36.25 36.25 0.00 100.0 0.0 76.63 0,0 46.9 0.0 60" P-SCAN UP Y 8.06 8.06 0.00 100.0 0.0 76.63 0.0 10.4 0.0 Restricted Scans LEFT SIDE 70 T-SCAN Y 8.38 8.38 0.00 100.0 0.0 71.88 0.0 10.2 0.0 LEFT SIDE 45&deg; T-SCAN Y 36.25 36.25 0.00 100.0 0.0 71.88 0.0 44.0 0.0 LEFT SIDE 60 T-SCAN Y 8.06 8.06 0.00 100.0 0.0 71.88 00 9.8 0.0 70&deg; P-SCAN DOWN Y 8.38 8.38 0.00 100.0 0.0 71.88 0.0 10.2 0.0 45&deg; P-SCAN DOWN Y 36.25 36.25 0.00 100.0 0.0 71.88 0.0 44.0 0.0 60* P-SCAN DOWN Y 8.06 8.06 0.00 100.0 0.0 71.88 0.0 9.8 0.0 Coverages 66.1 0.0 Total Composite Coverage 66.1 Comments: Automated Scanning was restricted on both sides due to Instrumentation Nozzle N12-A Convfl1,.
4314  CovCalc As 112212002 LA SALLE I R &#xfd; I A _ /
LaSalle 1 Shell Course 3 Required 45&deg; Exam Volume -36.25 Sq In.Required 600 Exam Volume -8.06 Sq In.Required 700 Exam Volume -8.38 Sq In.Right and Left Sides T(-I) -.?'T(dol) -?J37r LaSalle I Shell Course 3 Required 600 p-Scan Exam Volume -8.06 Sq In.Required 450 p-Scan Exam Volume -36,25 Sq In.450 and 600 p-Scan.als-Tnow) 37W LaSalle 1 Shell Course 3 Required 70&deg; P-Scan Exam Volume -8.38 Sq In.I- T(-.) -7.37r'ii Vest, pk)LaSalle I GOD-SL6C.xIs VESSEL SCANNING LIMITS 09/18/00 PDI SHELL COURSE: 3 1 <-Normal Package Position (1 or 0)PULSER OFFSET 0 counts VSLIR 127 COUNTS/INCH 1 WALL 6.75 BE-gate C-gate CH Beam TYPE ROT DELAY X Y START STOP A-GATE START STOP STOP 6 0. 0 B 3.66 0.00 0.00 -19.09 5.58 76 47 91 -1 0o 0 W 3.66 0.00 0.00 -5.58 5.58 76 --64 2 45. 90 T 13.26 1.72 3.14 -14.61 3.86 237 ---3 600 90 T 14.15 -0.83 3.14 -18.26 6.41 188 --4 450 180 P 13.26 3.27 0.00
-8.85 2.31 237 --5 600 180 P 14.15 3.27 6.12
-8.85 2.31 188 --7 700 90 T 12.00 0.00 6.12 -10.52 5.58 54 --8 700 180 P 12.00 4.27 3.14 -9.85 1.31 54 --1/25/2002 Page I 10: 14 AM GE NUCLEAR ENERGY UT EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET REPORT NO: 1R11-004 PROJECT LaSalle Unit 1 -Li R1 1 WELD ID: LCS BHSYSTEM: RPV INITIAL CALIBRATION ID: VES.91.IN.1 (Li R09)FINAL CALIBRATION ID: VES.91.OUT.1 (L1RO9)GERIS DATA: (See weld LCS-1-BG reports from L1RO9)MANUAL CALIBRATION:
N/A MANUAL DATA: N/A Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code, Section XI, 1989 Edition NoAddenda, Category B-A Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) Assembly Welds.Automated 0', 2.25 MHz Weld and Base Metal, 450S, 1.0 MHz, 60&deg;L, 2.0 MHz and 70&deg;RL, 2.0 MHz Transverse and Parallel scans were performed per the requirements of procedure GE-UT-704 V4, in accordance with Appendix VIII.Automated scanning was restricted on both sides of "BH" due to Instrumentation Nozzle N6-A.These examinations were performed during the L1R09 outage in 2002 which did not permit single side coverage.Reevaluation of this recorded data was performed in accordance with procedure GE-UT-704 V8 which is qualified for single sided access. The coverage was recalculated and resulted in an increase in coverage of 6.6%, taking the coverage from 82.2% to 88.8%Automated UT Composite Coverage = 88.8%GERIS 2000Software Revision 5.26 was used for aquisition and analysis.1P EPARED BY REVIEWED BY UTILITY REVIEW ANII REVIEW VATE Z-Z_-0, DATE 3/"S-o DATE DATE LaSalle Unit 1, LR1 1, 2006 Page _tof _2 Summary No.: 1 Ri 1-004"X.LaSalle Unit-1 LCS-1-BH Spring 2006 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA LENGTH CALCULATIONS Percent Weld Length = 87.5 Required Exam Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent Exam Volume = 52.69 Area Sq. In. Auto Auto Auto Auto 700 T-Scan A 8.38 8.38 15.9% 79.38 7.2%450 T-Scan A 36.25 36.25 68.8% 79.38 31.2%60' T-Scan A 8.06 8.06 15.3% 57.65 5.0%700 P-Scan A 8.38 8.38 15.9% 79.38 7.2%450 P-Scan A 36.25 36.25 68.8% 79.38 31.2%600 P-Scan A 8.06 8.06 15.3% 57.65 5.0%700 T-Scan 450 T-Scan 600 T-Scan B 8.06 4.03 7.6% 21.73 0.9%700 P-Scan 450 P-Scan 60' P-Scan B 8.06 4.03 7.6% 21.73 0.9%70' T-Scan 450 T-Scan 600 T-Scan 700 P-Scan 450 P-Scan 600 P-Scan I otal Composite Coverage =88.8d'Comments:
A -Examined accessible length. Weld length reduced by 25.23" due to N6-A nozzle cutoutB -Automated exam restricted due to the proximity of the N6-A nozzle Note -Rounding methods may affect calculated values.
GE NUCLEAR ENERGY UT EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET REPORT NO: 1R9-011 (PROJECT LaSalle Unit 1 -Li R09 WELD ID: LCS BH SYSTEM: RPV INITIAL CALIBRATION ID: VES.9I.IN.1 CALIBRATION VERIFICATIONS:
BM.1 FINAL CALIBRATION ID: VES.91.OUT.1 GERIS DATA: bhr.3, bhr.4, bhr.5, bhr.6, bhr.7, bhl.1, bhl.2, bhl.3, bhl.4'.. MANUAL 6AIi6ATiON:
N/A MANUAL DATA: N/A Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code, Section XI, 1989 Edition No Addenda, Category B-A Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) Assembly Welds.
Automated 0&deg;, 2.25 MHz Weld and Base Metal, 450S, 1.0 MHz, 60 0 L, 2.0 MHz and 70ORL, 2.0 MHz Transverse and Parallel scans were performed per the requirements of procedure GE-UT-704 V4, in accordance with Appendix VIII.The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded the following indications:
00 Weld Metal -No Recordable Indications 450 Transverse
-No Recordable Indications 60&deg; Transverse
-No Recordable Indications 700 Transverse
-(2) Indications Recorded -See Indication Data sheet -BH-001, BH-002 450 Parallel -No Recordable Indications 600 Parallel -No Recordable Indications 700 Parallel -No Recordable Indications The two (2) indications recorded above were evaluated and found to be acceptable per the requirements of IWB-3000.Plate segregates on both sides of weld "BH" were observed.Automated scanning was restricted on the both sides of weld "BH" due to Nozzle N6-B.Automated scanning was also limited at the top of weld "BH" due to the proximity of the thermocouple pads.Previous examination
'results were reviewed and changes are noted. (see below)The previous examination was performed with an earlier automated GERIS System which did not record the the RF data and only recorded reflectors over 20%.The present GERIS 2000 Automated system records the complete RF data during scanning, it also utilizes new search units with lower frequency elements and improved ultrasonic coupling.This examination is also in accordance with ASME Section XI Appendix VIII which is considered more critical of the examination volume, thus, more indications were recorded during this examination than the previous one.This change in results is not considered to be indicative of changes in the condition of the weld or associated base material.Automated UT Composite Coverage = 82.2%GERIS 2000 Software Revision 5.26 was used for aquisition and analysis.
PREPARED BY REVIEV/ED BY F=o UTILlT REV'I- W ANII REVIEW ATE DATE Ln 2 , AEDATE Z2-c Z i ,,, SUMNVDOC .L F Y= 455,01 T/C PADS BH N1O Area Scanned Y= 398,00 Area due to N6-B Nozzte Ne-B N12-B AC~Y= 332.50 Y= 464.75 00 T/C PADS BH NIO Area Scanned Y= 390.00 Area restricted lue to N6-B Nozzte N6-B N12-B Y= 349.50 AC Y= 332,25 (LaSalle Unit-1 Weld BH Jan-02 T Weld Length 87.15 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE AreaScanned
% of Area Scanned IWeld Length Scanned% Scanned (0 Area Inch 2  Auto Manual Auto Manual Auto Manual Auto Manual Urwustrtted Svens RIGHT SIDE 701 T-SCAN N 8.38 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 RIGHT SIDE 45 T-SCAN N 36.25 0.00 0.00 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 RIGHT SIDE 60*T-SCAN N 8.06 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 70&deg; P-SCAN UP N 8.38 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 45' P-SCAN UP N 36.25 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 60&deg; P-SCAN UP N 8.06 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 Unrestricted Scans LEFT SIDE 70 T-SCAN N 8.38 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 LEFT SIDE 45* T-SCAN N 36.25 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LEFT SIDE 60" T-SCAN N 8.06 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.070&deg; P-SCAN DOWN N 838 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,045&deg; P-SCAN DOWN N 36.25 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 60&deg; P-SCAN DOWN N 8.06 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 Restricted Scans RIGHT SIDE 70 T-SCAN Y 8.38 8.38 0.00 100.0 0,0 71.38 0.0 13.0 0,0 RIGHT SIDE 45&deg; T-SCAN Y 36.25 36.25 0,00 100.0 0.0 71.38 0.0 56.3 0.0 RIGHT SIDE 60 T-SCAN Y 8.06 8.06 0.00 100.0 0.0 71.38 0.0 12.5 0,0 70&deg; P-SCAN UP Y 8.38 8.38 0.00 1000 0.0 71.38 0.0 13.0 0.0 45' P-SCAN UP Y 36.25 36.25 0.00 100.0 0.0 71.38 0.0 56.3 0.0 60&deg; P-SCAN UP Y 8.06 8.06 0.00 100.0 0.0 71.38 0.0 12.5 0.0 Restricted ScansLEFT SIDE 70' T-SCAN Y 8.38 8.38 0.00 100.0 0,0 71.88 0.0 13.1 D.0LEFT SIDE 45&deg; T-SCAN Y 36.25 36.25 0.00 100.0 00 71.88 0,0 56.7 0.0LEFT SIDE 60&deg; T-SCAN Y 8.06 8.06 0.00 100.0 0.0 71.88 0.0 12.6 0.0 70 P-SCAN DOWN Y 8.38 8.38 0,00 100,0 0.0 71.88 0.0 13.1 0.0 45* P-SCAN DOWN Y 36.25 36.25 0.00 100.0 0.0 71.88 0.0 56.7 0.0 60&deg; P-SCAN DOWN Y 8.06 8.06 0.00 100.0 0.0 71.88 0.0 12.6 0.0 Coveragel 82.2 0.0 Total Composite Coverage 82.2 Comments:Weld length reduced 25.23" due to N6-B Nozzle cut-out Automated scanning was restricted on both sides of "SH" due to N6-8 Nozzle.
CovCalc~xls, 1/2212002 LA SALLE 1 RCI r'. A 7% 1r LaSalle 1 Shell Course 3 Required 450 Exam Volume -36.25 Sq In.Required 600 Exam Volume -8.06 Sq In.Required 70' Exam Volume -8.38 Sq In.Right and Left Sides T(no) -6.7V T(di) -7.37V LaSalle 1 Shell Course 3 Required 600 P-Scan Exam Volume -8.06 Sq In.Required 450 P-Scan Exam Volume -36.25 Sq In.T(on) -0.75 T(dl) -?.375" LaSalle 1 Shell Course 3 Required 700 P-Scan Exam Volume -8.38 Sq In.T(n -6,715 T(dWO) 7.315=
Vestpk)LaSalle I GOD-SL6C.xls VESSEL SCANNING LIMITS 09/18/00 PD1 SHELL COURSE: 3 1 <--Normal Package Position (1 or 0)PULSER OFFSET 0 counts VSLIR 127 COUNTS/INCH 1 WALL 6.75 BE-gate C-gate CH Beam TYPE ROT DELAY X Y START STOP A-GATE START STOP STOP 6 00 0 B 3.66 0.00 0.00 -19.09 5.58 76 47 91 -1 0&deg; 0 W 3.66 0.00 0.00 -5.58 5.58 76 --64 2 450 90 T 13.26 1.72- 3.14 -14.61 3.86 237 ---3 600 90 T 14.15 -0.83 3.14
-18.26 6.41 188 ---4 450 180 P 13.26 3.27 0.00 -8.85 2.31 237 ---5 60' 180 P 14.15 3.27 6.12 -8.85 2.31 188 ---7 7 0* 90 T 12.00 0.00 6.12 -10.52 5,58 54 ---8 70* 180 P 12.00 427 3.14 -985 1.31 54 --------1/25/2002 Page 1 r&#xfd;). I p PhA GE NUCLEAR ENERGY UT EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET Summary No: 1 R 11-021 PROJECT LaSalle Unit 1, L1R11 WELD ID: GEL-1009-DR Top Hd Meridional SYSTEM: RPV CALIBRATION ID: N/A MANUAL DATA: UT-036 and 37 OPERATORS:
W. Reid Lv II, Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code Section Xl, 1989 Edition no Addenda, and Section Xl, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PDI program description and theFederal Register, Part II, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 50 for Category B-A Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) Assembly Welds.Manual transverse and parallel scans were performed from the vessel OD surface in accordance with procedure GE-UT-300 V10; using 600 RL search units.Manual scanning was restricted due to the top head lifting lug and top hd. flange.The manual exams recorded no indications.
Previous data was reviewed with no significant changes.Manual UT composite coverage = 68 %/ii Ll LaSalle Unit-i, LR113, 2006 Page 1 of API; Report No. 1 R11-021 LaSalle Unit-1 GE-1009-DR Spring 2006 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Percent Weld Length = 67. Required Exam Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent Exam Volume = 23.3 Area Sq. In. Manual Manual Manual Manual 600 NS T-Scan A 5.5 5.5 23.6% 46 8.1%60' S6 T-Scan A 14.4 14.4 61.8% 46 21.2%60' S4 T-Scan A 3.4 3.4 14.6% 46 5,0%600 NS P-Scan A 5.5 5.5 23.6% 46.0 8.1%60* S6 P-Scan A 14.4 14.4 61.8% 46.0 21.2%60' S4 P-Scan A 3.4 3.4 14.6% 36.0 3.9%600 NS T-Scan 60' S6 T-Scan 600 S4 T-Scan B 3.4 1.7 7.3% 10 0.5%60' NS P-Scan __B___600 S6 P-Scan 600 S4 P-Scan Commnts:A -Examnedaccesibl wed legth% Total Composite Coverage =68%Comments:
A -Examined accessible weld length.B -P-Scan restricted due to lifting lug and top hd. Flange.Note -Rounding methods may affect calculated values.
Cn LaSalle Unit 1 Closure Head Meridionals 60 NS Exam Volume = 5.5 Sq. In,S6 Exam Volume = 14.4 Sq. In.60' FV S4 Exam Volume = 3.4 Sq. in.60' NS T-Scan achieved = 5.5 Sq In.FV S6 T-Scan achieved = 14.4 Sq. In.60W FV S4 T-Scan achieved = 3.4 Sq. In.60: NS P-Scan achieved = 5.5 Sq. In.60' FV S6 P-Scan achieved = 14.4 Sq. In.60' FV S4 P-Scan achieved
= 1.7 Sq. In.607TIP 60TIP 607T H- 3.0" -60'T CD CD 0 GE NUCLEAR ENERGY UT EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET Summary No: 1 R11-023 PROJECT LaSalle Unit 1, LiRl1 WELD ID: GEL-1009-DT Top Hd Meridional SYSTEM: RPV CALIBRATION ID: N/AMANUAL DATA:
UT-038 and 39 OPERATORS:
W. Reid Lv II, Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code Section XI, 1989 Edition no Addenda, and Section Xl, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PDI program description and theFederal Register, Part II, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 50 for Category B-A Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) Assembly Welds.Manual transverse and parallel scans were performed from the vessel OD surface in accordance with procedure GE-UT-300 V10; using 600 RL search units.Manual scanning was restricted due to the top head lifting lug and top hd. flange.The manual exams recorded no indications.
Previous data was reviewed with no significant changes.Manual UT composite coverage
= 68 %P EPARED BY DATE REVIEWED BY DATE UTILITY REVIEW DATE ANII REVIEW DATE UT LeveI: ~J UT Level:LaSalle Unit-i, LIR11, 2006 Page 1 of _4 N N LaSalle Unit-1 GE-1009-DT Spring 2006 Report No. 1R11-023 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Percent Weld Length = 67. Required Exam Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent Exam Volume = 23.3 Area Sq. In. Manual Manual Manual Manual 60' NS T-Scan A 5.5 5.5 23.6% 46 8.1%600 S6 T-Scan A 14.4 14.4 61.8% 46 21.2%600 S4 T-Scan A 3.4 3.4 14.6% 46 5.0%60' NS P-Scan A 5.5 5.5 23.6% 46.0 8.1%600 S6 P-Scan A 14.4 14.4 61.8% 46.0 21.2%600 S4 P-Scan A 3.4 3.4 14.6% 36.0 3,9%600 NS T-Scan 600 S6 T-Scan 60' S4 T-Scan B 3.4 1.7 7.3% 10 0.5%600 NS P-Scan 60' S6 P-Scan 60' S4 P-Scan% Total Composite Coverage =68%Comments:
A -Examined accessible weld length.B -P-Scan restricted due to lifting lug and top hd. Flange Note -Rounding methods may affect calculated values.
I-Unit 1 CD ,Closure Head Meridionals C 60' NS Exam Volume = 5.5 Sq. In.60' FV S6 Exam Volume = 14.4 Sq. In.60' FV S4 Exam Volume = 34 Sq. In.60' NS T-Scan achieved = 5.5 Sq. In.60' FV S6 T-Scan achieved = 14.4 Sq. In.60' FV S4 T-Scan achieved = 3.4 Sq. In.60' NS P-Scan achieved = 55 Sq In.60' FV S6 P-Scan achieved = 14 4 Sq. In.60W FV S4 P-Scan achieved = 1.7 Sq. In.S11.6"0 P 60TIP 60 'T I 3.0" 160'T CD 10, 0t ManuaL scan area Manuat scanning restricted due to Uting [ug Iaj N-&.~36.00" Manuat scan area
* GE NUCLEAR ENERGY UT EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET Summary No: 1 R 11-028 PROJECT LaSalle Unit 1, L1R11, 2006 WELD ID: LCS-1-N2ASYSTEM: Recirculation CALIBRATION ID: NOZIN EXAMINATION DATA: N2A-01 OPERATORS:
C. Gauthier Lv II; S. Gauthier Lv II Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code Section XI, 1989 Edition no Addenda, also Section XI, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PDI program description and the FederalRegister, Part II, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 50 for Category B-D Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV)Assembly Welds.Automated transverse and parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure GE-UT-705 V5, using 450 Shear wave, 600 RL, and 700 RL search units, supplemental 00 L-Wave scans were also performed.
Scanning for the inner 15% T volume for radial flaws was performed using 450 Shear wave search units as specified by the"Nozzle Inner Radius and Bore Requirements" sheet, which bas been verified by modeling.Automated scanning was performed from the vessel OD surface. Automated scanning was restricted due to the nozzle configuration.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system 0 reference is located at 900 CW of nozzle TDC.For calibrations refer to report G2K-CAL.K Seven (7) relevant indications were recorded that were found to be acceptable" per the requirements of IWB-3000, no furtherevaluations were required.Previous examination data was reviewed, no indications were recorded.Automated Composite Coverage = 83.1%.REPARED BY DATE REVIEWED BY DATE UTILITY REVIEW DATE ANII REVIEW DATE UT Level: :11: UT Level: LaSalle Unit 1, Li R1 1, 2006Pagel1of "-Z1 I-02 I'-M 0 LaSalle 1 N2 Nozzle -Recirculation Inlet 70* Exam Volume = 11.6 Sq. In 45' Exam Volume = 51.4 Sq. In Inner 15%T Exam Volume (60'T & IRS) = 10.6 Sq. In 70' T-Scan achieved
= 6.7 Sq. In 45* T-Scan achieved
= 46.9 Sq. In 600 T-Scan achieved = 10.6 Sq. In 707T 45&deg;T 60&deg;T I I I T-Sca s z-,
\I U-LaSalle 1 N2 Nozzle -Recirculation Inlet 700 Exam Volume = 11.6 Sq. In 450 Exam Volume = 51.4 Sq. In Inner 15%T Exam Volume (607T & IRS) = 10.6 Sq. In 70' P-Scan achieved = 5.5 Sq. In 450 P-Scan achieved = 42.0 Sq. In Inner 15% P-Scan achieved = 10.6 Sq. In P-Scans 70&deg;P 45 0 P Summary No.: 1R1R-028 LaSalle Unit-I, L1 R11 LCS-1 -N2A Spring 2006CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Percent Weld Length = 360. Required Exam Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent Exam Volume = 73.6 Area Sq. In. Auto Auto Auto Auto 70' T-Scan A 11.6 6.7 9.1% 360 4.6%450 T-Scan A 51.4 46.9 63.7% 360 31.9%600 T-Scan A 10.6 10.6 14.4% 360 7.2%700 P-Scan A 11.6 5.5 7.5% 360 3.7%450 P-Scan A 51.4 42 57.1% 360 28.5%IRS P-Scan A 10.6 10.6 14.4% 360 7.2%700 T-Scan 450 T-Scan 60' T-Scan 700 P-Scan 450 P-Scan IRS P-Scan 700 T-Scan 450 T-Scan 600 T-Scan 70' P-Scan 450 P-Scan IRS P-Scan% Total Composite Coverage =83.1%Comments:
A -Scanned 360 deg., Scanning limited due to nozzle configuration.
Note -Rounding methods may affect calculated values.
GE NUCLEAR ENERGY UT EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET Summary No: 1 R 11-029 PROJECT LaSalle Unit 1, L R1i1, 2006 WELD ID: LCS-1-N2G SYSTEM: Recirculation CALIBRATION ID: NOZ.IN EXAMINATION DATA: N2G-01 OPERATORS:
C. Gauthier Lv II; S. Gauthier Lv II Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code Section XI, 1989 Edition no Addenda, also Section Xl, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PDI program description and the Federal Register, Part II, Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 10 CFR Part 50 for Category B-D Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV)Assembly Welds.Automated transverse and parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure GE-UT-705 V5, using 450 Shear wave, 600 RL, and 700 RL search units, supplemental 0&deg; L-Wave scans were also performed.
Scanning for the inner 15% T volume for radial flaws was performed using 450 Shear wave search units as specified by the"Nozzle Inner Radius and Bore Requirements" sheet, which has been verified by modeling.Automated scanning was performed from the vessel OD surface. Automated scanning was restricted due to the nozzle configuration.
The GERIS 2000 00 automated UT system 0 reference is located at 900 CW of nozzle TDC.For calibrations refer to report G2K-CAL.Eleven (11) relevant indications were recorded that were found to be acceptable per the requirements of IWB-3000, no further evaluations were required.Previous examination data was reviewed, no indications were recorded.Automated Composite Coverage =
83.1%.EPA ED BY DATE REVIEWED BY DATE UTILITY REVIEW DATE ANII REVIEW DATE_ Level: _UT Level:-LaSalle Unit 1, L1R11, 2006 Page l1of r-LaSalle 1 N2 Nozzle-C)700 Exam Volume =45' Exam Volume =Inner 15%T Exam V, 70' T-Scan achieve(450 T-Scan achievec 600 T-Scan achieved T-Sca s 70'T 4 C DI-o 1'.Recirculation Inlet 11.6 Sq. In 51.4 Sq. In olume (60'T & IRS) = 10.6 Sq. In= 6.7 Sq. In= 46.9 Sq. In= 10.6 Sq. In&deg;T 607T I-" 0-Cd, a)N)0\I LaSalle 1 N2 Nozzle -Recirculation Inlet 700 Exam Volume = 11.6 Sq. In 450 Exam Volume = 51.4 Sq. In Inner 15%T Exam Volume (607T & IRS) = 10.6 Sq. In 70' P-Scan achieved = 5.5 Sq. In 450 P-Scan achieved = 42.0 Sq. In Inner 15% P-Scan achieved = 10.6 Sq. In P-Scans 70 0 P 45 0 P~AJ Summary No.: IR11-029 LaSalle Unit-i, LI R1 1 LCS-1-N2G Spring 2006 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Percent Weld Length = 360. Required Exam Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent Exam Volume = 73.6 Area Sq. In. Auto Auto Auto Auto 700 T-Scan A 11.6 6.7 9.1% 360 4.6%450 T-Scan A 51.4 46.9 63.7% 360 31.9%600 T-Scan A 10.6 10.6 14.4% 360 7.2%700 P-Scan A 11.6 5.5 7.5% 360 3.7%450 P-Scan A 51.4 42 57.1% 360 28.5%IRS P-Scan A 10.6 10.6 14.4% 360 7.2%700 T-Scan 450 T-Scan 60' T-Scan 700 P-Scan 450 P-Scan IRS P-Scan 700 T-Scan 450 T-Scan 600 T-Scan 70' P-Scan 450 P-Scan IRS P-Scan% Total Composite Coverage =83.1%Comments:
A -Scanned 360 deg., Scanning limited due to nozzle configuration.Note -Rounding methods may affect calculated values.
*GE NUCLEAR ENERGY UT EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET Summary No: 1 R 11-030 PROJECT LaSalle Unit 1, L1R11, 2006 WELD ID: LCS-1-N2HSYSTEM: Recirculation CALIBRATION ID: NOZIN MANUAL DATA: UT-182 EXAMINATION DATA: N2H-01 OPERATORS:
C. Gauthier Lv II; S. Gauthier Lv II Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code Section XI, 1989 Edition no Addenda, also Section XI, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PDI program description and the Federal Register, Part II, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 50 for Category B-D Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV)Assembly Welds.Automated transverse and parallel scans were perfoi'med in accordance with procedure GE-UT-705 V5, using 45&deg; Shear wave, 60* RL, and 70' RL search units, supplemental 0' L-Wave scans were also performed.
Scanning for the inner 15% T volume for radial flaws was performed using 45" Shear wave search units as specified by the"Nozzle Inner Radius and Bore Requirements" sheet, which has been verified by modeling.Automated scanning was performed from the vessel OD surface. Automated scanning was restricted due to the nozzle configuration and the proximity of the N9-B nozzle.Manual supplemental scanning was performed in the restricted area from 114.8" to 155.4".Manual transverse and parallel scans were performed from the vessel OD surface in accordance with procedure GE-UT-300 V10; using 60" RL search units The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system 0 reference is located at 900 CW of nozzle TDC.For calibrations refer to report G2K-CAL.Two (2) relevant indications were recorded that were found to be acceptable per the requirements of IWB-3000, no further evaluations were required.Previous examination data was reviewed, no indications were recorded.Automated and Manual Composite Coverage
= 83.1%._EPARED BY DATE REVIEWED Bf DATE UTILITY REVIEW DATE ANII REVIEW DATE Level: -T UT Level: LaSalle Unit 1, L1IR11,2006 Page t of 1 r-LaSalle 1 o)CD N2 Nozzle -R a)740 Exam Volume = 11., 450 Exam Volume = 51..Inner 15%T Exam Volun 700 T-Scan achieved =450 T-Scan achieved =600 T-Scan achieved
=T-Sca s 70'T 45*T III I----- -iL- -~ctt ecirculation Inlet 6 Sq. In 4 Sq. In ne (607T & IRS) = 10.6 Sq. In 6.7 Sq. In 46.9 Sq. In 10.6 Sq. In 607T (I-CD I-o 0b LaSalle 1\/N2 Nozzle -Recirculation Inlet 700 Exam Volume = 11.6 Sq. In 450 Exam Volume = 51.4 Sq. In Inner 15%T Exam Volume (60-T & IRS) = 10.6 Sq. In 70' P-Scan achieved = 5.5 Sq. In 450 P-Scan achieved = 42.0 Sq. In Inner 15% P-Scan achieved = 10.6 Sq. In P-Scans 70&deg;P 45 0 P---Z==~l.0 0 N2-J N2-H 155.40 N9-B_r 114.80 0 T/C PADS Automated Scanning restricted due to the proximity of the N9-B nozzle Summary No.: IR1R-030 LaSalle Unit-I, L1R11 LCS-1-N2H Spring 2006 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Percent Weld Length = 360. Required Exam Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent Exam Volume = 73.6 Area Sq. In. Auto Auto Auto Auto 70' T-Scan A 11.6 6.7 9.1% 360 4.6%450 T-Scan A 51.4 46.9 63.7% 360 31.9%600 T-Scan A 10.6 10.6 14.4% 319.4 6.4%70' P-Scan A 11.6 5.5 7.5% 360 3.7%450 P-Scan A 51.4 42 57.1% 360 28.5%IRS P-Scan A 10.6 10.6- 14.4% 319.4 6.4%70_ T-Scan 450 T-Scan 600 T-Scan B 10.6 10.6 14.4% 40.6 0.8%700 P-Scan 450 P-Scan IRS P-Scan B 10.6 10.6 14.4% 40.6 0.8%700 T-Scan 450 T-Scan 600 T-Scan 70' P-Scan 450 P-Scan IRS P-Scan 7/ I otal Luo posie Coverage =05. 170 Comments:
A -Scanning restricted due-to nozzle configuration and due to the proximity of the N9-B nozzle.B -Manual supplemental scanning performed in area restricted by N9-B nozzle.Note -Rounding methods may affect calculated values.
'GE NUCLEAR ENERGY ( UT EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET Summary No: 1 R 11-031 PROJECT LaSalle Unit 1, L1R11, 2006 WELD ID: LCS-1-N5 SYSTEM: Core Spray CALIBRATION ID: NOZ.IN EXAMINATION DATA: N5-01 OPERATORS:
C. Gauthier Lv II; S. Gauthier Lv II Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code Section XI, 1989 Edition no Addenda, also Section XI, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PDI program description and the Federal Register, Part II, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 50 for Category B-D Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV)Assembly Welds.Automated transverse and parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure GE-UT-705 V5, using 45" Shear wave, 600 RL, and 70* RL search units, supplemental 0" L-Wave scans were also performed.
Scanning for the inner 15% T volume for radial flaws was performed using 45" Shear wave search units as specified by the"Nozzle Inner Radius and Bore Requirements" sheet, which has been verified by modeling.Automated scanning was performed from the vessel OD surface. Automated scanning was restricted due to the nozzle configuration.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system 0 reference is located at 900 CW of nozzle TDC.For calibrations refer to report G2K-CAL.K Eleven (11) relevant indications Were recorded that were found to be acceptable per the requirements of IWB-3000, no further evaluations were required.Previous examination data was reviewed, no indications were recorded.Automated Composite Coverage = 85.5%.,.P!EPARED BY DATE REVIEWED BY DATE UTL0-ITY REVIEW DATE ANII REVIEW DATE UT Level: ] UT Level:.LaSalle Unit 1, L1R11, 2006 PageJOf Zf I-0 0 t-E CD LaSalle 1 N5 Nozzle -Core Spray 70&deg; Exam Volume = 9.4 Sq. In45&deg; Exam Volume = 38.3 Sq. In Inner 15%T Exam Volume (60'T & IRS) = 8.2 Sq. In 700 P-Scan achieved
= 5.0 Sq. In 450 P-Scan achieved = 32.4 Sq. In Inner 15% P-Scan achieved = 8.2 Sq. In P-Scans 70 0 P I 45&deg;P-El (0 o"O LaSalle 1 N5 Nozzle -70' Exam Volume =450 Exam Volume =Inner 15%T Exam V 70' T-Scan achieved 450 T-Scan achieved 600 T-Scan achieved T-Scars 707T 4501 II I-U-I Core Spray9.4 Sq. In 38.3 Sq. In olume (607T & IRS) = 8.2 Sq. In
= 6.2 Sq. In= 35.6 Sq. In= 8.2 Sq. In T 60'T I Summary No.: IR1I-031 LaSalle Unit-I, LR11I LCS-1-N5 Spring 2006 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Percent Weld Length = 360. Required Exam Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent Exam Volume = 55.9 Area Sq. In. Auto Auto Auto Auto 700 T-Scan A 9.4 6.2 11.1% 360 5.5%450 T-Scan A 38.3 35.6 63.7% 360 31.8%600 T-Scan A 8.2 8.2 14.7% 360 7.3%700 P-Scan A 9.4 5.0 8.9% 360 4.5%450 P-Scan A 38.3 32.4 58.0% 360 29.0%IRS P-Scan A 8.2 8.2 14.7% 360 7.3%700 T-Scan 450 T-Scan 600 T-Scan 70' P-Scan 450 P-Scan IRS P-Scan 70' T-Scan 450 T-Scan 600 T-Scan 700 P-Scan 450 P-Scan IRS P-Scan~.. -~.I--Ii'/o I otal uomposie Coverage =85b.5bo Comments:
A -Scanned 360 deg., Scanning limited due to nozzle configuration.Note -Rounding methods may affect calculated values.
~GE NUCLEAR ENERGY UT EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET Summary No: 1 R 11-032 PROJECT LaSalle Unit 1, Li R1 1, 2006 WELD ID: LCS-1-N6B SYSTEM: LPCI CALIBRATION ID: NOZ.INIT.INEXAMINATION DATA:
N6B-01 OPERATORS:
C. Gauthier Lv II; S. Gauthier Lv II Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code Section XI, 1989 Edition no Addenda, also Section Xl, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PDI program description and the Federal Register, Part II, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 50 for Category B-D Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV)Assembly Welds.Automated transverse and parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure GE-UT-705 V5, using 45" Shearwave, 60" RL, and 70&deg; RL search units, supplemental 0&deg; L-Wave scans were also performed.
Scanning for the inner 15% T volume for radial flaws was performed using 45" Shear wave search units as specified by the"Nozzle Inner Radius and Bore Requirements" sheet, which has been verified by modeling.Automated scanning was performed from the vessel OD surface. Automated scanning was restricted due to the nozzle configuration.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system 0 reference is located at 900 CW of nozzle TDC.For calibrations refer to report G2K-CAL.(" Six (6) relevant indications were recorded that were found to be acceptable per the requirements of IWB-3000, no further evaluations were required.Previous examination data was reviewed, no indications were recorded.Automated Composite Coverage = 83.7%.P ,PEPARED BY DATE REVIEWED BY DATE ' UTILITY REVIEW DATE ANII REVIEW DATE"T Level: j-- UT Level: LaSalle Unit 1, LiR11, 2006 Page__I Of t 9, LaSalle 1 N6 Nozzle -LPCl 700 Exam Volume = 12.0 Sq. In 450 Exam Volume = 44.8 Sq. In Inner 15%T Exam Volume (60&deg;T & IRS) = 9.6 Sq. In 70&deg; T-Scan achieved = 7.1 Sq. In 450 T-Scan achieved = 40.8 Sq. In 60&deg; T-Scan achieved = 9.6 Sq. In 707T 45&deg;T 60 0 T T-Scans 7N ( ____LaSalle 1 N6 Nozzle -LPCI 700 Exam Volume = 12.0 Sq. In 450 Exam Volume = 44.8 Sq. In Inner 15%T Exam Volume (60&deg;T & IRS) = 9.6 Sq. In 70' P-Scan achieved = 5.9 Sq. In 450 P-Scan achieved = 38.2 Sq. In Inner 15% P-Scan achieved = 9.6 Sq. In P-Scans 700 P I 450 P-Scans I N Summary No.: 1Rl1-032 LaSalle Unit-I, Li R11 LCS-1 -N6B Spring 2006 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Percent Weld Length = 360. Required Exam Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent Exam Volume = 66.4 Area Sq. In. Auto Auto Auto Auto 70' T-Scan A 12 7.1 10.7% 360 5.3%450 T-Scan A 44.8 40.8 61.4% 360 30.7%60o T-Scan A 9.6 9.6 14.5% 360 7.2%70' P-Scan A 12 5.9 8.9% 360 4.4%450 P-Scan A 44.8 38.2 57.5% 360 28.8%IRS P-Scan A 9.6 9.6 14.5% 360 7.2%70_ T-Scan 450 T-Scan 600 T-Scan 700 P-Scan 450 P-Scan IRS P-Scan 700 T-Scan 450 T-Scan 600 T-Scan 70_ P-Scan 450 P-Scan IRS P-Scan% Total Composite Coverage =83.7%Comments: A -Scanning restricted due to nozzle configuration.
Note -Rounding methods may affect calculated values.
(GE NUCLEAR ENERGY UT EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET Summary No: 1R 11-033 PROJECT LaSalle Unit 1, LR1i1 WELD ID: LCS-1-N7 Top Head Nozzle SYSTEM: RPV CALIBRATION ID: N/A MANUAL DATA: UT-103, 104,113 and 114 OPERATORS:
S. Snyder Lv II, Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code Section Xl, 1989 Edition noAddenda, and Section Xl, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PDI program description and the Federal Register, Part II, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 50 for Category B-A Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) Assembly Welds.
Manual transverse and parallel scans were performed from the vessel OD surface in accordance with procedure GE-UT-300 VI 0; using 60&deg; RL search units. Manual parallel scans of the inner 1 5%T volume were performed in accordance with procedure GE-UT-31 I V14, using model validated shear wave search units.Manual scanning was restricted due to the nozzle configuration.
The manual exams recorded no indications.
Previous data was reviewed with no significant changes.Manual UT composite coverage = 87 %DATE ANII REVIEW DATE 1 LaSalle Unit-l, L1R11, 2006 Page 1 of __
Report No. 1R11-033 LaSalle Unit 1, L1R11 LCS-1 -N7 Spring 2006 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Percent Weld Length = 360. Required Exam Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent Exam Volume = 22. Area Sq. In. Manual Manual Manual Manual 600 T-Scan S4 A 2.2 2.2 10.0% 180.0 2.5%60' T-Scan S6 A 19.8 16.6 75.5% 180.0 18.9%IRS P-Scan S4 A 2.2 2.2 10.0% 180.0 2.5%60' P-Scan S6 A 19.8 15.0 68.2% 180.0 17.0%Exam Volume = 21.7 60' T-Scan S4 B 3.8 3.8 17.5% 180.0 4.4%600 T-Scan S6 B 17.9 16.7 .77.0% 180.0 19.2%IRS P-Scan S4 B 3.8 3.8 17.5% 180.0 4.4%600 P-Scan S6 B 17.9 15.8 72.8% [ 180.0 18.2%600 T-Scan S4 600 T-Scan S6 IRS P-Scan _4 600 P-Scan S6 600 T-Scan S4 60' T-Scan S6 IRS P-Scan S4 60' P-Scan S6% Total Composite Coverage =87%Comments:
A -Top side of offset nozzle. Examined 1800 length. Scanning limited due to nozzle configuration.B -Bottom side of offset nozzle. Examined 1800 length. Scanning limited.due to nozzle configuration.
Weld length in degrees. IRS examination coverage determined by modeling.Coverage sheet modified for offset nozzle configurations.
Note -Rounding methods may affect calculated values.
Top Side Coverage LaSalle Unit 1 Top Hd. Spray / Spare 600 NS Exam Volume = 7.3 Sq. In.600 FV S6 Exam Volume = 12.5 Sq. In.60&deg; FV S4 Exam Volume = 2.2 Sq. In.60&deg; NS T-Scan achieved = 4.2 Sq. In.60' FV S6 T-Scan achieved = 12.4 Sq. In.600 FV S4 T-Scan achieved = 2.2 Sq. In.Bottom Side Coverage 60' NS Exam Volume = 6.09 Sq. In.60' FV S6 Exam Volume = 11.8 Sq. In.60' FV S4 Exam Volume = 3.8 Sq. In.60' NS T-Scan achieved = 4.9 Sq. In.60* FV S6 T-Scan achieved
= 11.8 Sq. In.60' FV S4 T-Scan achieved
= 3.8 Sq. In.60' NS P-Scan achieved = 4.3 Sq. In.60' FV S6 P-Scan achieved = 11.5 Sq. In.Inner 15%T IRS-Scan achieved = 3.8 Sq. In.9" 10" 45&deg;P 11.0"60&deg;P 60-T r.600 NS P-Scan achieved = 3.8 Sq. In.60' FV S6 P-Scan achieved = 11.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T IRS-Scan achieved = 2.2 Sq. In.5.2- 4.6" 60OT 60'P GE NUCLEAR ENERGY UT EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET Summary No: 1 Ri 1-034 PROJECT LaSalle Unit 1, LI R1 1 WELD ID: LCS-1 -N8 Top Head Nozzle SYSTEM: RPV CALIBRATION ID: N/AMANUAL DATA:
UT-115, 116, and 117 OPERATORS:
W. Reid Lv II, Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code Section Xl, 1989 Edition no Addenda, and Section Xl, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PDI program description and the Federal Register, Part II, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 50 for Category B-A Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) Assembly Welds.Manual transverse and parallel scans were performed from the vessel OD surface in accordance with procedure GE-UT-300 V10; using 600 RL search units. Manual parallel scans of the inner 15%T volume were performed in accordance with procedure GE-UT-311 V14, using model validated shear wave search units.Manual scanning was restricted due to the nozzle configuration.
The manual exams recorded no indications.
Previous data was reviewed with no significant changes.Manual UT composite coverage
= 79 %PEPAkED BY DATE REVIEWED BY DATE UTIL-TY REVItW DATE ANII REVIEW DATE UT Level: tIc UT Level: (LaSalle Unit-l, L1R11, 2006 Pagelof _7 o Report No. 1Rll-034 LaSalle Unit 1, L1R11 LCS-1-N8 Spring 2006 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Percent Weld Length = 360. Required Exam Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent Exam Volume = 24.8 Area Sq. In. Manual Manual Manual Manual 600 NS T-Scan A 7.6 3.5 14.1% 360 7,1%60' S6 T-Scan A 14 13.7 55.2% 360 27.6%60' S4 T-Scan A 3.2 3.2 12.9% 360 6.5%60' NS P-Scan A 7.6 3.1 12.5% 360 6.3%600 S6 P-Scan A 14 12.5 50.4% 360 25.2%60' S4 P-Scan A 3.2 3.2 12.9% 360 6.5%60' NS T-Scan 60' S6 T-Scan 600 S4 T-Scan 600 NS P-Scan 600 S6 P-Scan 60' S4 P-Scan% Total Composite Coverage =79%Comments:
A -Manual scanning restricted due to nozzle configuration.
Note -Rounding methods may affect calculated values.
600 NS Exam Volume = 7.6 Sq. In.600 FV S6 Exam Volume = 14.0 Sq. In.600 FV S6 Exam Volume = 3.2 Sq. In.60&deg; NS T-Scan achieved = 3.5 Sq. In.60' FV S6 T-Scan achieved = 13.7 Sq. In.600 FV S4 T-Scan achieved = 3.2 Sq. In.60' NS P-Scan achieved = 3.1 Sq. In.60' FV S6 P-Scan achieved = 12.5 Sq. In.600 FV S4 P-Scan achieved = 3.2 Sq. In.LaSalle Unit 1 LCS-1-N8 Top Hd. Vent 6.4" "P-Scans 60OT-d 4.21 a K WI
*GE NUCLEAR ENERGY UT EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET Summary No: 1 R1 1-026 PROJECT LaSalle Unit 1, L'lR'11, 2006 WELD ID: LCS-1-N16 SYSTEM: Core Spray CALIBRATION ID: NOZIN EXAMINATION DATA: N 16-01 OPERATORS:
C. Gauthier Lv II; S. Gauthier Lv II Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code Section XI, 1989 Edition no Addenda, also Section Xl, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PDI program description and the Federal Register, Part II, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 50 for Category B-D Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV)Assembly Welds.Automated transverse and parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure GE-UT-705 V5, using 45* Shear wave, 600 RL, and 70' RL search units, supplemental 0&deg; L-Wave scans were also performed.
Scanning for the inner 15% T volume for radial flaws was performed using 45&deg; Shear wave search units as specified by the"Nozzle Inner Radius and Bore Requirements" sheet, which has been verified by modeling.Automated scanning was performed from the vessel OD surface. Automated scanning was restricted due to the nozzle configuration.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system 0 reference is located at 900 CW of nozzle TDC.For calibrations refer to report G2K-CAL.Six (6) relevant indications were recorded that were found to be acceptable per the requirements of IWB-3000, no further evaluations were required.Previous examination data was reviewed, no indications were recorded.Automated Composite Coverage = 85.5%.PEPAR D BY DATE REVIEWED BY DATE UTILI IEW DATE ANII REVIEW DATETU Lvelee ,U Le__ _LaSalle Unit 1, LIR11, 2006 Page I Of 19 U)4 0 -LaSalle 1N16 Nozzle 70' Exam Volume =45' Exam Volume =Inner 15%T Exam V 70' T-Scan achievec 450 T-Scan achievec 600 T-Scan achievec Z T-Scals 70'T 45&deg;=I-I I I m l (t!-Core Spray 9.4 Sq. In 38.3 Sq. In olume (60&deg;T & IRS) 8.2 Sq. In
-= 6.2 Sq. In I = 35.6 Sq. In= 8.2 Sq. In r 60'T I CD)I-a 0 0)LaSalle 1 N 16 Nozzle -Core Spray 700 Exam Volume = 9.4 Sq. In 450 Exam Volume
= 38.3 Sq. In Inner 15%T Exam Volume (60'T & IRS) = 8.2 Sq. In 70' P-Scan achieved = 5.0 Sq. In 450 P-Scan achieved = 32.4 Sq. In Inner 15% P-Scan achieved = 8.2 Sq. In P-Scans 70Tp I 45TP-U CD 0 Summary No.: IR11-026 LaSalle Unit-I, L1R11 LCS-1-N16 Spring 2006 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Percent Weld Length = 360. Required Exam Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent Exam Volume = 55.9 Area Sq. In. Auto Auto Auto Auto 700 T-Scan A 9.4 6.2 11.1% 360 5.5%450 T-Scan A 38.3 35.6 63.7% 360 31.8%600 T-Scan A 8.2 8.2 14.7% 360 7.3%70' P-Scan A 9.4 5.0 8.9% 360 4.5%45' P-Scan A 38.3 32.4 58.0% 360 29.0%IRS P-Scan A 8.2 8.2 14.7% 360 7.3%700 T-Scan 450 T-Scan 600 T-Scan 700 P-Scan 45' P-Scan IRS P-Scan 700 T-Scan 450 T-Scan 600 T-Scan 700 P-Scan 450 P-Scan IRS P-Scan% Total Composite Coverage = 85.5%Comments:
A -Scanned 360 deg., Scanning limited due to nozzle configuration.
Note -Rounding methods may affect calculated values.
*GE NUCLEAR ENERGY UT EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET Summary No: 1 R 11-027 PROJECT LaSalle Unit 1, Li R1 1 WELD ID: LCS-1-N18 Top Head NozzleSYSTEM: RPV CALIBRATION ID: N/A MANUAL DATA: UT-099, 100, 129 and 130 OPERATORS:
S. Snyder Lv II, a Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code Section Xl, 1989 Edition no Addenda, and Section Xl, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PDI program description and the Federal Register, Part II, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 50 for Category B-A Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) Assembly Welds.Manual transverse and parallel scans were performed from the vessel 00 surface in accordance with procedure GE-UT-300 V10; using 600 RL search units. Manual parallel scans of the inner 15%T volume were performed in accordance with procedure GE-UT-31 1 V14, using model validated shear wave search units.Manual scanning was restricted due to the nozzle configuration.
The manual exams recorded no indications.
Previous data was reviewed with no significant changes.Manual UT composite coverage = 87 %ii Ll LaSalle Unit-i, L1R11, 2006 Page1 of 0)&#xa3;1)C r-Report No. 1RII-027 LaSalle Unit 1, L1R11 LCS-1-N18 Spring 2006 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Percent Weld Length = 360. Required Exam Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent Exam Volume = 22. Area Sq. In. Manual Manual Manual Manual 600 T-Scan S4 A 2.2 2.2 10.0% 180.0 2.5%600 T-Scan S6 A 19.8 16.6 75.5% 180.0 18.9%IRS P-Scan S4 A 2.2 2.2 10.0% 180.0 2.5%600 P-Scan S6 A 19.8 15.0 68.2% 180.0 17.0%Exam Volume = 21.7 600 T-Scan S4 B 3.8 3.8 17.5% 180.0 4.4%60' T-Scan S6 B 17.9 16.7 77.0% 180.0 19.2%IRS P-Scan S4 B 3.8 3.8 17.5% 180.0 4.4%600 P-Scan S6 B 17.9 15.8 72.8% 180.0 18.2%600 T-Scan S4 600 T-Scan S6 IRS P-Scan S4 600 P-Scan S6 600 T-Scan S4 600 T-Scan S6 ' 'IRS P-Scan S4 60' P-Scan S6''STotal Composite Coverage =87%Comments: A -Top side of offset nozzle. Examined 1800 length. Scanning limited due to nozzle configuration.B -Bottom side of offset nozzle. Examined 1800 length. Scanning limited due to nozzle configuration.Weld length in degrees. IRS examination coverage determined by modeling.Coverage sheet modified for offset nozzle configurations.
Note -Rounding methods may affect calculated values.
I-LaSalle Unit 1 Top Hd. Spray / Spare Top Side Coverage 600 NS Exam Volume
= 7.3 Sq. In.600 FV S6 Exam Volume = 12.5 Sq. In.60&deg; FV S4 Exam Volume = 2.2 Sq. In.60' NS T-Scan achieved = 4.2 Sq. In.600 FV S6 T-Scan achieved 12.4 Sq. In.600 FV S4 T-Scan achieved 2.2 Sq. In.Bottom Side Coverage 60' NS Exam Volume = 6.09 Sq. In.600 FV S6 Exam Volume = 11.8 Sq. In.60' FV S4 Exam Volume = 3.8 Sq. In.60' NS T-Scan achieved = 4.9 Sq. In.60' FV S6 T-Scan achieved = 11.8 Sq. In.600 FV S4 T-Scan achieved = 3.8 Sq. In.600 NS P-Scan achieved = 4.3 Sq. In.60' FV S6 P-Scan achieved = 11.5 Sq. In.Inner 15%T IRS-Scan achieved = 3.8 Sq. In.600 NS P-Scan achieved = 3.8 Sq. In.60' FV S6 P-Scan achieved = 11.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T IRS-Scan achieved = 2.2 Sq. In.10,6" 45-P 60&deg;TIP 5.2" 607T 9 45-P~1i 1.o060*P1&#xfd; 607T 1 Report No.: EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET IRII-oel GE NUCLEAR ENERGY Site: LaSalle Station Component ID: RPV-SS-1 Outage: LIR11 Lua System: RPV ASME Cat.: B-K ASME Item 810.10 Aug Req.: ASME Sec.XI Exams Data Sheet ..Procedure Calibration Block Examination Cert Level Date Performed Personnel PT PT-01I 100-PT-OO V.rr/RvV5 N/A Alicia Hutton II1 3/5/2006 VT-1 VT-001 ER-AA-335-Q14 Ver/IRev R2 N/A Alicia Hutton II 3/5/2006 Examination Results: During the liquid penetrant and the visual examination of the above referenced weld, no recordable indications were detected.Due to adjacent structures only 66% of the required exam area was accessible for PT inspections. Due to this limiting condition a VT-i examination was performed on 100% of the required examination area.This examination meets the requirements of ASME Section Xl, 1989 Edition with no Addenda.Examination results were compared to data report: D-733 from 1989 outage with No Change These examinations were performed under Work Order: 704866 Change This Summary and the following data sheets have been reviewed and accepted by the following personnel:
RWP: N/A_. ....... Dose: 24 mr.Utility Review: Date: GE.. R B L l: Dat " R : Dat P'GE Review By: Level: Date: ANII Review: Date: Page 1 of 3 GE Nuclear Energy LIQUID PENETRANT EXAMINATION REPORT Site: LaSalle Station Unit: I Project: LIRII Report Number: IRII-061 Sheet No.: PT-011 Weld No.: RPV-SS-i Configuration:
Lua Drawing: GEL-1109 System: RPV Procedure No.: GE-PT-1O0 Ver/Rev.:
V5 DRR: N/A Material:
Surface Condition:
Item: Carbon Steel Ground Weld -Final Technique:
Cleaner Penetrant Developer Visible Solvent Removable (8-3) Manufacturer Maanaflux Maenaflux MaRanflux Thermometer 245993 Brand I Type SKC-S SKL-SPI SKD-S2 Temperature; 85F Batch No. 04GO0K 01KOS5 99D14K Black Light: N/A Light Meter. N/A Blacklight Intensity:
N/A pW/cm 2 Pre Clean Method: Spray & Wive Drying Time: 5 min.Penetrant Application Brushing Dwell Time: 10 min.Penetrant Removal Wipe with dry towel Drying Time: 5rmin.Wipe with damp towel Developer Apjolication:
Sprav Developing Time: 10 mrin.Indication Number:
 
== Description:==
 
Results: Comments: Exam Start: 1010.Exam was performed on the accessible area's 66% tori and both sides. A VT-1 rnrnminatinn n~rfnrm~v4 nn 1nno1% nf thA_ hin 5== 'iT-I VJT-E m was performed on the acc sible ar 's 66% too and both sid .A VT-1 examination was nerformed on 1000,L of tha fun See VT-1 Re -VT-001 for results. No recordable indications.
001 for results. No recordable indications I Alicia Hutn GE Review Level Date Level Date ANI! , Date D ate Page .of 3 ANII Review Q GE Nuclear Energy VISUAL EXAMINATION REPORT i eport Number: R1l1-061 Site: LaSalle Station Unit: 1 Project: LIR11o: Sheet No.: VT-0O01 Weld No.: RPV-SS-1 Configuration:
Lua ASME Code Class:
I ASME Category:
B-K ASME Item: B10.10 Drawing: GEL-1109 System: RPV Procedure No.: ER-AA-335-014 Version: R2 DRR: N/A TECHNIQUE EQUIPMENT LIGHTING TOOLS RESOLUTION Exam Type: VT-i i Minor -Flashlight Six Inch Scale Gray Card Tehiqe Magnifier F-, Ambient 1Bintoculars Technique:
Direct 7 RemoteBANVideo
[7 Other F] Welding Gauge -3 Remote Color Video N/A Thread Gaug 1otter HO"er N/A N/A COMPONENT DATA Material Surface Condition Equipment Condition Component Carbon Stee Ground N/A Final Weld Indication Numberj
 
== Description:==
 
Results: Comments: A VT-1 examination was performed on 100% of the lug.Lug is 14"w* 7" h.No Recordable Indications Alicia Hutton It 3/5'2006 &4 o(ciIu xaminer Level DateutlyReiwDe GE Review Level Date ANII Review Date Page 3 of 3 Site. LaSalle Statio Outage: LIR11 Svstem: HPCS n Component ID: IHP-PUI-04 Plate-Shell ASME Cat.: C-C ASME Item: C3.30 Aug Req.: ASME Sec.Xl Exams Cal I Data Sheet Procedure Calibration Block Examination
!Cert LevelO Date Performed Personnel MT E-MT-001 " -VrRev S N/A -Alicia Hutton II i 2122/2006 Examination Results: During the magnetic particle examination of the above referenced weld, no recordable indications were detected.16% of the required exam area was examined.This examination meets the requirements of ASME Section XI, 1989 Edition with no Addenda.Examination results were compared to data report: NIA from N/A outage with No Change These examinations were performed under Work Order 704866 Change This Summary and the following data sheets have been reviewed and accepted by the following personnel:
RWP: N/A t -R Dose: 3 mr.Ui Jiew: Date: GE Review By: ANII Review: Date: Page 1 of GE Nuclear Energy MAGNETIC PARTICLE EXAMINATION REPORT Site: LaSalle Station Unit: I Project: LIR11 Report Number: IRII-073 Sheet No.: MT-0O01 Weld No.: IHP-PUI-04 Configuration:
Plate-Shell Drawing: GEL-1049 System: HPCS Procedure No.: GE-MT-1O0 Version / Revision:
V6 DRR: N/A Material:
Surface Condition:
Item: Carbon Steel Cleaned Weld -Final Magnetizing Apparatus Black Light Mfg: Parker Research Yoke Calibration:
2-15-06 Model Serial Number Model: B-300 Blacklight:
N/A N/A Serial No. 5522 Yoke Spacing: 4"-6" Light Meter: N/A N/A Thermometer:
245993 Surface Temperature:
82&deg; F Technique Examination Medium Blacklight Intensity Magnetization:
AC Magnetic Particles:
Dry N/A Technique:
Continuous Parker Research RP-6 11793 Blacklight Intensity Manufacturer Particle Type: Batch No.:Indication Number:;
 
==
Description:==
 
Results: NRl Comments: Examined only 28" of the 171.25" due to concrete pedestal surrounding the pump. See attached photo, No recordable indications.
Alicia Hutton I. 2/222006 Util yR v Date I[itainer Level Date GE Review Level Date ANII Review Date Page L of 3 0 GEN'ticlear Engat SKETCH SHEET Report No: IRI1-073 Component ID: IHP-PUI1-04 Accessable portion of weld prior to paint removal Examiner Lv Utii~ty Reviewed By:j -f$Q., Date --Da-: Reviewed By:-Date: 12 o ,/p Page 3of _3 Lv. D_ Date: ;I .2l6-0 Site: LaSalle Station Component ID: Outage: LIRII System: LPCS ASME Cat: C-C ASME Item: ILP-PU-04 Plate-Shell C3.30 Aug Req: ASME Sec.Xl Exams CalI Data Sheet Procedure Calibration Block Examination &#xfd;Cert Level4 Date Performed Personnel MT MT-003 GElMay.&deg; Ver/ev VS ..A Clay Suhler _11 1 2/23/2006 Examination Results: During the magnetic particle examination of the above referenced weld, no recordable indications were detected.24% of the required exam area was examined.This examination meets the requirements of ASME Section X1, 1989 Edition with no Addenda.Examination results were compared to data report: N/A from N/A outage with No ChangeThese examinations were performed under Work Order 704866 Change This Summary and the following data sheets have been reviewed and accepted by the following personnel:
RWP: NALI rdyLR Dose: 3 mr.Ut.ityR view: Date: GE Review By: ANII Review: Date: Page 1 of 3 GE Nuclear Energy MAGNETIC PARTICLE EXAMINATION REPORT Site: LaSalle Station Unit: I Project: LIRII Report Number: IR11-074 Sheet No.: MT-003 Weld No.: ILP-PU-04 Configuration:
Plate-Shell Drawing: GEL-1050 System: LPCS Procedure No.: GE-MT-100 Version / Revision:
V6 DRR: N/A Material:
Surface Condition:
Item: Carbon Steel Cleaned Weld -Final Magnetizing Apparatus Black Light Mfg: Parker Research Yoke Calibration:
2115/06 Model Serial Number Model: B-300 Blacklight:
N/A N/A Serial No. 5522 Yoke Spacing: 6" Light Meter: N/A N/A Thermometer:
246641 Surface Temperature:
840 F Technique Examination Medium Blacklight Intensity Magnetization:
AC Magnetic Particles:
Dy N/A Technique:
Continuous Parker Research RP-6 11793 Blacklight Intensity:
Manufacturer Partide Type: Batch No.: Indication Number:;
 
== Description:==
 
I-Reuts:.. .... ...... N RI.Comments: Examined only 28" of the 117.20" due to concrete pedestal surrounding the pump. See attached photo.No recordable indications.
Clay Suhler 60 // 2123/2006 Uti tyReliew Date$jiti iner Level Date GE Review Level Date ANII Review Date Page of 3 W GE Nuclear Energi, SKETCH SHEET Report No: IR11-074 Component ID: ILP-PU-04 Accessable portion of weld Rev~ewed By:____________
Lv. V-7Data: &Z~''D Reviewed By: Date: Utility Reviewed By: &#xfd;-' LL- v Dt:Pge3 o Lv. Date: Page 3 of 3 Report No.: EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET IRI-075\~/GE NUCLEAR ENERGY Y Site: LaSalle Station Component ID: IRH-PUIC-04 Outage: LIR11 Plate -Shell System: RHRR ASME Cat.: C-C ASME Item C3.30 Aug Req.: ASME Sec.Xl Exams T DataSheet Procedure Calibration Block Examination Cert Level Date Performed Personnel MT j MT-009 GE-MT-1O0 Ver/Rev V6 NWA Alan Kelly II 2/28/2006 Examination Results: During the magnetic particle examination of the above referenced weld, no recordable indications were detected.21% of the required exam area was examined.This examination meets the requirements of ASME Section X1, 1989 Edition with no Addenda.Examination results were compared to data report: NIA from N/A outage with No Change These examinations were performed under Work Order: 704866 1 Change This Summary and the following data sheets have been reviewed and ac epted by the following personnel:
RWP: N/A.O //cae Dose: mr.EReie B: eel a/ite l ANReview:
Date: _ 1__ of___GE Review By: Level: Date: ANII Review: Date: Page 1 of3 iW GE Nuclear Energy MAGNETIC PARTICLE EXAMINATION REPORT Site: LaSalle Station Unit: I Project: LIR1I I Report Number: 1RIl-075 Sheet No.: MT-009 Weld No.: IRH-PUIC-04 Configuration:
Plate -Shell Drawing: GEL-1003 System: RHR Procedure No.: GE-MT-100 Version / Revision:
V6 DRR: N/A Material:
Surface Condition:
Item: Carbon Steel Cleaned Weld -Final Magnetizing Apparatus Black Light Mfg: Parker Research Yoke Calibration:
2115/06 Model Serial Number Model: B-300 Blacklight:
N/A N/A Serial No. 8164 Yoke Spacing: 3"-6" Light Meter: /A N/A Thermometer 246541 Surface Temperature:
730 F Technique Examination Medium Blacklight Intensity Magnetization:
AC Magnetic Particles:
Pry N/A Technique:
Continuous Parker Research RP-6 11793 Blacklight Intensityt.
Manufacturer.
Particle Type: Batch No.:... ... .. ...........
Indication Number -Description:
Rsls Comments: Examined 25" of 1 16.375" due to concrete pedestal surrounding the pump. See attached photo.No recordable indications.Alan Kell
/_ 2/28/2006 Date'Reiaew Level Date IGE Review Level Da te, ANI Review Date Page of 3
''GE NucerEyr SKETCH SHEET Report No: lRll-075 CG'HPOueut LD: IRH..PLIC..O 4 Report No: 1R11475 Compo~~~~
ID: I>Acess pabe portion of weld Reviewed By: /&Lv. W ae Utility Reviewed 8 Lv. -' -Date:_____
Reviewed By: Date./~~ ~) ~3 Page Y r
 
$ENERAL 0 ELECTRIC I POMP LOCXATION 2.2.C 2c.G-2oc- Is ELEV. CpT5'R),R. POMP AkSSE-MBLY REP. liSPeC'OI&#xfd;f C.r..KMuSTs I P .-Iv3 -,Zs IP, M e-2,4.X4 4*V- ---OAK Whoiok.ZLL GEL.- I os?T-S- 8 I UW-9 S RO T. 4.Au I 713-I LZT7~IJ~jimms, 11 L.&AW'I u1 4  S~' MW I I-!* ~5S~* .Si I, I A I- 'I.I..... ,I..... .m I *I *l , I., ,. .. , #: 4..... *4 L&~IIt M.A~4.-d'4'.3.4.,.4.I .of t Ail .1 I .I -i I y .~ ..j I-' x-- .. _Jm
* u,..-. S."B ~r Lb $CNS-a'3"i M_ ,_ ..!"780,-" if!:!:.* I -~ -~ -I -A'78 r 2,,> ...'At's (5;...~ j'Y*C*EIJ 1L'&#xa3;4 K 3-Si-I. *~ h I I~4.I IIII I III I -."Be V"V a'..I~v-'Ia, I Air!*4 .1W oar 4N'* :i!(y#,.. -Ii : :: ..... .....:: * ' "555 t V. m-EU'Ewll MCmlNUA 8MU~Too 70G.ICO UI% comnw 04LIE5r-&M U low NO KLEU 31To , "-,.:-4=4-1 snJ~J~ I 4*1 I-.4-~1.~,i~.a Ret To 94AM Assuo Uin AWOMamt WWV tCMCIMI , ASAL El- ;~&#xfd;EE , RI NG''MA P S YSTEM-r&#xfd;LASALLE.
Coui.t' %T1Jtm INSORCcc INSECI1OI PRO, RAM IrAUNG NO I 4....................................................
I .* .I *1~--ii ZI i~E-I* -U ~U IGENEIAL 0 ELECTRIC LGE&deg; 10 1SO&deg;TOP VESSEL. NEAhO 0irIT 
.I GENERAL IF ELECTRIC GLIOI GEL- 1001 tWo*so a BOTTOM VESSEL.AE40 OWT z.
IGENERAL
* ELECTRIC FG&#xfd;&#xfd;-) i I I MOTE: Aab c &PAE..Q04kLLY SPACED 4OT_: LOCATIC*4 4X2A a M 20.5 semE Wa. *&A2T SERI-ACE AT".R, OOTLET I R~k-WA&2I,.b R UET EXC .MGP.PR I *~* CURL tLIETUIC RLEF: Imp- P02.NP POMP  OMIT 2.Q&K BROOKb,,,L.
SENERAL
* ELECTRIC GF-L-ZC)%REF :ILP-POZ LP POMP-ASSEMBLLY OM1k4IT 2 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 Page 20 of 22 December, 1993 (ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT: / 2  PAGE:-:;:;
/ OF PROCEDURE:
NDT- 30 REV. _, DATA SHEET NO.: 27- / /4 DAM&#xfd; /a --Z CALIBRATION SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: 0- 2?a ANGLE BEAM: axial At114- circ. _ _ _ _ _COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: /2TV WELD #: 6&-/0C' 0 -/9 WELD TYPE: 77&#xf7; --rpIZE: 2/ THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
S. YC MATERIAL:
c .COMPONENT TEMPERATURE:
'/ -SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: <f d6 ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: Aq/ A COUPLANT/BATCH #: ?;C- &eL_- :A: -2 ANGLE BEAM CIRC.: ,,4 /(?EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam /- _2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow -N 3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow -/4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW -i/a 5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW -F L 6) Straight Beam of Weld V 0 W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal /UP STRM WELD DN STR (EXAMINER:
LEVEL: /7i DATE:_____
REVIEWER:-
LEVEL: =/~Zi DATE:_ _____OTHER: C.- 5,A;,-V,!57 LEVEL: -Z T DATE: / 'Z STATION: 6.DATE:_ _____AN II: ~ ..DATE: JI~1 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 Page 20 of 22 December, 199: (ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
I < //- / PAGE, ( OF /PROCEDURE:
NDT- C 30 REV. .2 DATA SHEET NO.: __ -/ ___ DATk: /1 -27 CALIBRATION SHEET NO. (S)ST. BEAM: N/F 1- ANGLE BEAM:
axial / circ. (2, -OW COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: 12 P V WELD #: 6E-/"e -/1 WELD TYPE: 7-4 -PIPE 4IZE: .?/ THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
: 5. '/0 MATERIAL: S COMPONENT TEMPERATURE: /SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: N // ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: .d COUPLANT/BATCH #: 0 ? 7 ANGLE BEAM CIRC.: 'q d EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam , _ _/_ _ _2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow __ P.z ,, 3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow 4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW 7 _5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW F L 6) Straight Beam of Weld /- _ __0 W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal /&#xfd;4/A/4 UP STRM WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS A~~4p~~~&~~Fr P/d~ -,) 0 -3cj ri 2I1-EVEL"-DATE REVIEWER:
LEVEL: .DATE:___________
OTHER: O Z7 LEVEL: DATE: STATION:.
: 6. DATE:_ ____ANII: ~l(~ L~. ~ <A DATE: A COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 Page 20 of 22 December, 199.(ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
/,AO//-Z Z PAGE:&#xfd; / OF PROCEDURE:
NDT- 3 RV. __ DATA SHEET NO.: ID- / -- DATZ: /0 -Z -4 CALIBRATION SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: ________ANGLE BEAM: axial ?K (-072 circ. 0 --COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: P V, WELD #: E/-/C:O -' WELD TYPE: 7- -FL ,P P iZ E: THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
45.'e-1 MATERIAL:
4 COMPONENT TEMPERATURE:
J_ r I p SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: -4 /1 ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: '/'COUPLANT/BATCH #: U(-T:?A cLJ S _- 3?_ S ANGLE BEAM CIRC.: _ -, ___EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam -t/, 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow /3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow 4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW
: 5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW F L 6) Straight Beam of Weld '4 1A 0 W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal / / /UP STRM WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS st4E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 /1 7 U 7/ /?-,4t474(14 R~ /10 -30) T)~EXAMINER.
LEVEL: -L DATE:_____________
REVIEWER:________
____ LEVEL:_____
DATE:______
OTHER: C,.i Z* --- f-w LEVEL: DATE: /O3/STATION: DATE: _ _ _ANII: C.4 ATE: -f c-0GE Nuclear Energy REPORT NO.:/.~~PAGE:L Lo: /GE REVIEWED BY LEVEL Typical design for Top Head to Flange Weld number GEL-1 060-AG Exam coverage is limited due to the flange configuration
/,p 12 -9,4 DATE 0%66.70%66.70%450 66.70%66.70%100.0%0.0%88.90%64.46%60&deg;66.70%66.70%100.0%0.0%91.30%Exam Area CW Circ scans CCW Circ scans Ax Down Ax Up Base Metal UTILITY REVIEW DATE 64.94%SMAD REVIEW DATE Total composite coverage for Weld GEL-1 060-AG = 65.37%60-S 45&deg;S 60 0 S NDT-B-1 Revision 6 December'1 i 1993 Page 4iof 44 FORM NDT-B-l-F1 MAGNETIC PARTICLE EXAMINATION DATA SHEET ,DATE _e______
STATION & UNIT LaSalle Unit2 I L2R07 DAT EXAMINER &xl" A/ (2 77 7-- LEV.....RSYT ,eactor Pressure Vessel COMPONENT SECTION XI EDITION & ADDENDA 1989 Edition, No Addenda SECTION XI CATEGORY B-A ACCEP PROCEDURE
# & REVISION NDT-B-1 Rev. 6 SKETCH SHE COMMENTS:
Configuration:
TH-FL/'- ASHEET# #EL GEL-1060-AG CODE CLASS Class I TANCE STD. IWB-3510 ET USED: YES NO _/.Manufacturer Yoke ram er Particles Magnaflux Black Light N/A B.L.M. Readings NIA B.L.M. Time Checks Initial EXAM RESULTS ACCEPT REVIEWED BY: EXAMINER-z k &REVIEWER: OTHER: ITATION: Model/Type B300 NIA S/N NIA Final Current AC X DC Color G,,AV NIA N/A REJECT LEVEL: LEVEL: .LEVEL: DATE: DATE: DATE: /i2-J!--DATE: DATE: I-f--? 7 ANII: 34,5r~ncnt COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 C Page 20 of 22 December, 1993 (ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
27 Z=4 PAGE: OF PROCEDURE:
NDT- C-30 REV. if DATA SHEET NO.: ___DAT_____
_/CALIBRATION SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: C-O- 0 -ANGLE BEAM: axial _ _/ _ circ. _ _ __ _COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: WELD #:/.-?-/I WELD TYPE: _ /___"_,_" _-PIPE.!&#xfd;.SIZE:
Z5/ THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
7 '5 A MATERIAL:
,..COMPONENT TEMPERATURE:
7(of 165659 4 SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: 36 1 ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: ,(-/14 COUPLANT/
/ .BATCH #: df 547 ! ANGLE BEAM CIRC.: EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam K X 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow X d 3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow x _ _/_4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW o 5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW L 6) straight Beam of Weld X 0 W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metsa' x c/UP STRM WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS t.-0 ," AE T / /-&#xa3; qWe /j'z%/6,qr ..7OAJ &#xb6;A?4h'//.i.
6EX1iO /L'C/ &deg; -7Z) /- _./&5 /6&'< /76J 61,44n1A/IEJ -A 700 2i6 REVIEWER: AN II: ~-L-=VEL :.EVEL: /_ _LEVEL: DATE: /0 /1 /&DATE:__________
DATE:______
Page 20 of 22 December, 1993 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 (ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
LASALLF 'J/V/T- 3t 2. PAGE: OF /PROCEDURE:
NDT- e-30 REV. __ DATA SHEET NO.: _ --/_____ /0-8 1-6 CALIBRATION SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: A)/4 ANGLE BEAM: axial e- circ. -COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: F<PV WELD #: LCS- 2-AE WELD TYPE: SH 4- FL*%,,?.Ps SIZE: -THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
7.95/ MATERIAL:
C-S COMPONENT TEMPERATURE:
76 o r 6SS8 SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: IV/A ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: 0 r 3 COUPLANT/BATCH U: ULTRA&EL IT c153 Z5 ANGLE BEAM CIRC.: 6. d '0 d EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam X V/4/ \ 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow A 3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow 06 V IA__4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW X 2_5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW >< A-FL 6) Straight Beam of Weld K W/A 0 W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal I//A IAv/ /UP STRM WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS'9 5" 5,4 A-Ag 56AW 5ETr/.wU-7-o /1b1A/t1TA1A1 A -3o% IL:> t o.L 0&S467 VA-P I'D 1vicL),-Arlolyvs t5,CO1_4t PA a) PARTIAL DUE TO FLAN,&E" C0ir-tugA7-j010 EXA /8o00- 276- 346f EXAMINER:
L P.LEVEL: 1 DATE: I-, ?"6 REVIEWER:
LEVEL:______
DATE:_________
OTHER: (fA0LEVEL:
-~ DATE: /S~~STATION DATE:_____
ANII:DATE: -Z-17___17_
COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2;:tPage 20 of 22 December, 1993 (ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
IIqSA#L.i
/ PAGE: OF PROCEDURE:
NDT-C RV. C_ DATA SHEET NO.: __ --/__ 46 DAT1k CALIBRATION SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: A//4 ANGLE BEAM: axial (f-- ___--7 circ. C-eDr7 COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: __ __ WELD #: LC -a-AE WELD TYPE: ,.H-"L PIPE; IZE: A_5_/ THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
Z .MATERIAL:
CS COMPONENT TEMPERATURE:
7 SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: A11. ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: 1.V COUPLANT/BATCH i: E1 r _ ANGLE BEAM CIRC.: d_,____B EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam / /// \ 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow U-1 3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow 7-- 4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW V v 5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW V F L 6) Straight Beam of Weld /0 W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal V/ IVA , UP STRM WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 64ANTIAL tX)AMA ZkIFZ -T.Z L & &#xfd;C'01',, .t+ 1,] A.'9 ,<o- L- 3/- , LCV EXAMINER:
LEVEL: DATE: .__/__/___, REVIEWER:
__-__-_-_
_LEVEL:_ ____ DATE:__________
OTHER: , _5'/'A. LEVEL:-= DATE: / -,96 STAT ION~cI~K&~-6.DATE:_______
ANII: 'NDATE: 2t-j SGE Nuclear Energy Vessel to Flange Weld, LCS-2-AE. This exam was performidifrom 180' to 2700 to 360'. Due to the configuration of the Flange the following coverage was achieved: (0o 54,56%45'54.56%54.56%100.0%0.0%62.51%54,32%600 54.56%54.56%100.0%0.0%66.35%55.09%Exam Area CW Circ scans CCWCirc scans Ax Down Ax Up'Base Metal 54.56%Total Composite Coverage = 54.65%FLANGE ,60 0 S 45"S 6001 GE REVIEWED BY LEVEL UTILITY REVIEW DATE SMAD REVIEW DATE DATE REPORT NO.: PAGE: oZ O I..Page 20 of 22 December, 1993 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
ZAA1. c.PAGE: z;, OF /PRoCEDURE:
NDT- C30 REV. ta. DATA SHEET NO.: L- ( DATaE:. --CALIBRATION SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: C_-____(__e_
ANGLE BEAM: axial _ /____ ...... circ.CO,[PONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: RPV WELD i: 1-C_5_-_"-_IA WELD TYPE: iVZ- .9siz THICCESS/SCHEDULE:
: 6. " (0MTERIAL:
C COM14PONENT TEMPERATURE:
iIF L' ~?p.SC.AN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: 4'. 0 we ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: 'COUPLANT / /BATCH #: ULTRAGEL i: 95325 ANGLE BEAM CIRC.: W14 EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indications YES NO NO YES 1 ) Base Metal Straight Beam X -X/ \ 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow X N1 3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow
* X A114 4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW _ _ X /4 5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW X 11/A L 6) Straight Beam of Weld x W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal X .... I .NIA UP STRM WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS SCANN6D 4 10,1 7T0 JAINrAr1 0 % 3A C K REFLECTION.
NO RECORDABLE TNDrCAT!OJ)5 0o/ LONG1TrUD-WAL
(, EXAM 'Art REVIEW4ER:
OTHER.: ANII: LEVEL: 'III LEVEL: __I77--LEVEL: DATE: 1 /DATE: J L i DATE: 10.7-1?96 DATE: /6712ii2&#xfd;4-DATE: //- oy-7 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Page 20 of 22 Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 December, 1993 ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
/-A 5ALL5 vt4r 7 PAGES JIOF PROCEDURE:
NDT- c-30 REV. _ DATA SHEET NO.: IJ-/(G7. DATEI 1O 96*, CALIBRATION SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: A)/I4. ANGLE BEAM:
axial 06______ 7 circ. e --_ __ 7 COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: , PV WELD #: LC5-. -'/ViA WELD TYPE: /V1_ -SH ,,Pt.,,SZE:
2H.0 THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
6, q 9 MATERIAL:
1C 5 COMPONENT TEMPERATURE:
8 $ f5 B (" SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: AJ/V/ ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: d. 8 COUPLANT/BATCH #: C-L-TAgA&LL E 1*3Z5 ANGLE BEAM CIRC.: 5_-____EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam X ,VI__A/ \ 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow A4 /A 3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow x 4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW 5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW F L 6) Straight Beam of Weld ?< ,vA._w 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal _.V_ A//A I Wv/A UP STRM WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 5 C-AWN AEO P /8o /3Egcrs /_% 1 r, V o,,03o I O IRoLL ORSERVbED
/,P &-Eo/AhETRY REio-.' RE.cofABt&-
LEVF15.E NE 1 -S A E &#xa3;4M PE EV NL A"ZZTEO L."u74 2 6S FA 9 EXAMINER:
&#xa3;/-.ZLEVEL:
J2DATE: J?~~REVIEWER:-
LEVEL: _L7__ DATE:______
OTHER:L~4&dL LEVEL: ..-2&#xfd; DATE:// STATION: DATE:/'ANII: DATE: L ((j Page 20 of 22 December, 1993 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 K, (ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
A 11A & Z2 PAGE: / OF 7-_PROCEDURE:
NDT- C30 REV. , DATA SHEET NO.: /-I C-- DATri /0 --7 CALIBRATION SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: __ _ __ ANGLE BEAM: axial circ. (f_- 0_ _ '7 COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: RV WELD#: i Cf 1/4 A WELD TYPE: //Z -S p;PE ,SIZE.: THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
: t. '" MATERIAL:
_ 2 _S COMPONENT TEMPERATURE:
Aq OF SS $ l e e SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: /V/A ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: 6 5, C COUPLANT/BATCH # C CA4TP A ANGLE BEAM CIRC.: ( 7( EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam X IV/A/ \ 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow X I//A 3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow X 4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW X -5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW A -F L 6) Straight Beam of Weld _ N/A W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal X //A I /A ///UP STRM WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 0 6S -D D2 Cr6O M 6r < 15 0 ,_o 6 COD 4v s n~ t- 1 v6D~ 6 X AM TlDA6 TO /V /O,1rL E c),\jF ( AR T Ij*(00A0F EXAMINER:
aj LEVEL: 1?DATE: IC- 7-REV IEWER. E E~~ DATE: /67./2 '14: OTHER: f4,V,',, LEVEL: DATE: /-o -..DATE: ,, ANII: ~~~DATE: ______V/ /* I GE Nuclear Energy Typical design for Recirculation (N1) RPV Nozzle Assemblies.
REPORT NO.:~~f74CPAGE:__-OF:
Z Due to the configuration of Nozzle NiA, weld number LCS-2-NIA examination coverage is as follows: I"GE REVIEWED BY LEVEL DATE UTILITY REVIEW DATE SMAD REVIEW DATE 0.65.42%65.42%450 65.42%65.42%100.0%0.0%89.22%64.01%60&deg;65.42%65.42%100.0%0.0%93.40%Exam Area CW Circ scansCCW Circ scans Ax Down Ax Up Base Metal.64.85%Total Composite Coverage = 64.76%HALF SCALE 600 450 S lit Page 20 of 22 December, 199 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
ZAA)E7 / ' PAGE0, / OF /PROCEDURE:
NDT-C_30 REV. _a DATA SHEET NO.: -4 DA : 2 '-fo CALIBRATION SEET NO. (S)ST. BEAM: _ -- __ ANGLE BEAM: axial --VIA circ. _ _ _COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: A'PV WELD i: WC'2A)S' "5")WELD TYPE:
251 THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
: i. MATERIAL: _ _ "__ _COMPONENT TEMPERATURE:
I( '-  (SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: av ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: _ _ _COUPLANT!
jj ________BATCH 0 _: _L"T___A________
9S345 ANGLE BEAM CIRC.: EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam i I/ \ 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow z *3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow -p- /4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW , _ __5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW V _/_L 6) Straight Beam of Weld w 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal ,' -t1',:4 I__'!.4 UP STRM WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 4,- NeAujJro43/4'Jid D 70- IUWAArV Z% ,lA9bCK 1?UrE Te7?06A Oxhi11NA7'OcAJ 4 1-17E0r6 -r4 utPtif~ JWL&#xfd;I R/b Du~e Tro ,pt X1'gcnfwvA.16
/e101r/C)A)15 EXAMINER:
LEVEL: V DATE: lo- 9' REVIEWER:
LEVEL: CZr7- DATE:_ ____z _ _OTHER: C ,----- , LEVEL: -2= DATE: /1-0 Y-P STATION:
ANII: DATE:-I.
Page 20 of 22-December, 1993 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Roe. 2 C ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
4A S4 41EljNIT_,V2..
PAGE:' / OF /PROCEDURE:
NDT-C-3__
REV. ___ DATA SHEET NO.: >/-C/DAI:
0-9 -CALIBRATION SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: A_)_/4- ANGLE BEAM: axial 6- circ. _ _ __ _COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: APV WELD I: _C 2- /a43C WELD TYPE: /V-SH'"I'PI IZE: A -/ THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
: 7. 4.1" MATERIAL:
LS COMPONENT TEMPERATURE:
1&#xfd;8'".y5-165$SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: _ / ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: 0. cB COUPLANT/BATCH #: V ?&-gXq L- U- 952.3 j ANGLE BEAM CIRC.: b@.OdB EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam $ N/,/ \ 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow 3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow AIJA 4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW /<5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW >< A F L 6) Straight Beam of Weld A / _1_A 0 W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal /V 1A N///UP STRM WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS IV 0 REWCDARLA E 114EI CA71TW5 -6AWA STT77"/6 -IAT,yTAv)VEDP 10%o" 30,,o IO RoLL I D 6&fo1\iE7RZ oi3SERV&k BELouA RECOADARLE LEVELS 95 &deg; SHEA)?EXAMINER:
q1 0  ." LEVEL: DATE: I '9 REVIEWER: _ _ _ -_ _ _LEVEL: 7 DATE: //d- 2 OTHER: 5 .0 LEVEL: _z L .DATE: _ _____SAII: C DATE: ANII: DATE: 2S Page 20 of 22 December, 1993 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Prccedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2.,~L) ~(ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
LASAi.LF_
/ .PAGE:' / OF PROCEDURE:
NDT- CL REV. _ DATA SHEET NO.: -?OC DATE:  CAL:BRAT:ON SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: _ /t) _ __ ANGLE BEAM: axial Cf -circ. _ _____COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: RPV. WELD #: LCSC-,2- 3 WELD TYPE: A/Z-SH 1-1"" THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
Z ....5MATERIAL:
CS COMPONENT TEMPERATURE:
?FtL 3, SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: AJ/f ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: 1.A COUPLANT/BATCH *: aLTZA(L7 ANGLE BEAM CIRC.: EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow 3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow A/ _ _ _ _ _4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW, -!5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW L 6) Straight Beam of Weld *_40_ I 0 UP STRM WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AJAM- A/MNTh1tAIFD to -p20% PS14 Dea XQ & EOM ETAh Q 8EE0 Ral6 J?9,fz%4W14P a'eG7 4,o SYEAR FAflM.EXANIA.&#xfd;ER:
LEVEL: .YDATE: 10/76~4 REVIEWER:
LEVEL: iZZ DATE: /a. /2 '5 OTHER: O Z l._&#xfd;"V-9zp--
LEVEL: DATE: /0 STAN:0'I:
DATE: , 9 Id 917 ANTI: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ DATE:-- __ _ __ _
0 GE Nuclear Energy Typical design for Main Steam ( N3 ) RPV Nozzle Assemblies.
REPORT NO.: PAGE:--L OF: -Due to the configuration of Nozzle N3D, weld number LCS-2-N3D examination coverage is as follows: lX44e,?a GE REVIEWED BY LEVEL DATE UTILITY REVIEW DATE SMAD REVIEW DATE 0.62.15%62.15%45'62.15%62.15%100.0%0.0%84.76%61.81%60&deg;62.15%62.15%100.0%0.0%88.73%Exam Area CW Circ scans CCW Circ scans Ax Down Ax Up Base Metal 62.60%&0 Total Composite Coverage
= 62.19%HALF SCALE Page 20 of 22 December, 199.COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
/4SAI-F / ., PAGE / OF /PROCEDURE:
NDT- c-30 REV. 2Y DATA SHEET NO.: 6- / g/9 DATE: /1-- -A.CALIBRATION SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: '-C ~ ANGLE BEAM: axial ________ciro.
COMPONENT INSPECTED AiVZZ4 SYSTEM: A'PV WELD #: Z6 -A'3a 64-WELD TYPE:
L
&#xfd;&#xfd;_y_ THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
Z 14 MATERIAL:
)5&#xfd; '--)COMPONENT TEMPERATURE:
__ " SW1 /;s5'Y&#xfd;p (SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: .00 014& ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: BATCH 0:
E7* ANGLE BEA CIRC.: EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam/\2) Angle Beam -Normal-Against Flow -VI 3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow i- I N/4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW A 5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW -F L 6) Straight Beam of Weld Z.-0 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal .... j ,.UP STRM WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS6Dt.J 6 A'l 7-rl /yAiAT"A1) go% rsi$ 1AC_< RFFLEC770, ffXAtAWhA-rlOA' LimrrEo 7Z) UPPE~R _514ELL )?)AJ6 OLJE T-6 COJF&#xfd;1U,?AT4co) 6F A1 N6TLE.~)g ZE I OTDAeA 7LADJC  EXAMINER:
A~i'24~.i7LEVEL:
.2z DATE: 10- 9-36 REVIEWER:
LEVEL: _ _ _ DATE: /0,/ 2 , OTHER: & -Je"f,,sO LEVEL:_ ________ DATE: //- -, STATION: DATE:__ I___ ____ANII: _ DATE: 2--0-L It7 Page 20 of 22 December, 199.COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 (ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
A /-IL u/V '- q 2-- PAGEt.J OF /PROCEDURE:
NDT- r--3 REV. 2. DATA SHEET NO.: " 9/1 DAfT: 161- 9c CALIBRATION SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: _________
ANGLE BEAM: axial _ --____ circ. C-0 75-COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: ApV WELD #: Z 65 N-2-A'3 WELD TYPE: /V 2- SHTHICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
2 L &#xa3; MATERIAL:
C S COMPONENT TEMPERATURE:
c r-p 16 r SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: A//4- ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: .d.1O3J COUPLANT/BATCH #: )LTiZA 6- EL ANGLE BEAM CIRC.: g EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam ,VIA 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow K 1 3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow 2 A 4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW >e 5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW L 6) Straight Beam of Weld V >_ _____0 W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal ,V/A ,W/A 'w/ A'UP STRM WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS IP O5,,SFgVEZ
/.ELOu- P 1 EC.4og)A'LE LEVELS.SHEAR EXAMINER:
_________________LEVEL:____________
q-TE fJ4 REVIEWER:
_ _ _ --_ LEVEL: L DATE: dCn,//., .OTHER: LEVEL: DATE: STATION:c e DATE:_______
IANII: DATE: __7__-It__7 Page 20 of 22 December, 1993 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Prccedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
LASALLE PAGE:~j OF /PROCEDURE:
NDT-C-3p REV. _, DATA SHEET NO.: L-171/f__
DATE: &t/9/!CAL BRAT:ON SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: ___ ____ANGLE BEAM: axial C-7__-___7(_
circ._______
COMIPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: APV WELD 0: LCS-- AJ.D -WELD TYPE: A4Z -SH... ,P," 2 SZE: o,,/ THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
: 7. MATERIAL: .S coMPoNE TEMPERTR:
CS SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: Al/A;' ANGLE B3EAM AXIAL: COUPLANT/
ANGLE BEAM CIRC.: BATCH #: I.i-T&.ew L AA EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam .,' ..., i'.-/ \ 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow -3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow .e !..4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW -5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW -L 6) Straight Beam of Weld 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal _/_4444 l /#, UP STEM WELD DN ST ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 4APX-_AfrrN41 D 10 M 901 9 X R5LL, t7') C75MEV 6B:5Qi)21j5O 9CL42W RE 490ARLE L sticl-S.ExAMr;E: iA2 ~LEVEL:_______
DATE_______
R E VIH E R : L EV E L _ _ _ _ _ DA T E .: A */ 2 .OjTHER: .LEVEL: .DATE: /."-Y-?P STAT'ON: DATE:____ANII _______________
DATE- 2~- )--g GE Nuclear Energy Typical design for Main Steam ( N3) RPV Nozzle Assemblies.
REPORT NO.: b-/_ PAGE:t__OF:
/Due to the configuration of Nozzle N3C, weld number LCS-2-N3C examination coverage is as follows: GE REVIEWED BY LEVI-UTILITY REVIEW~-/0-/Z -14, Li DATE DATE 0.62.15%62.15%45&deg;62.15%62.15%100.0%0.0%84.76%61.81%600 62.15%
62.15%100.0%0.0%88.73%Exam AreaCW Circ scans CCW Circ scans Ax Down Ax Up Base Metal 62.60%SMAD REVIEW DATE Total Composite Coverage = 62.19%HALF SCALE CON.MC.7,N'EALTH EDISON COMPANY Prccedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 220 of 22"December, 1993 (ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STAT:!N,'UNIT:
LASALLE-i UNIT t PAGE: / OF /PROCC:UPZ:
NDT-C-3__
REV. 2 DATA SHEET NO.: b- 0oi f4 DATE: 10-J12-1 cAL:FAT:ON SHEET NO.(S)ST. BE:A.: (2 -0? 4 ANGLE BEAM: axial ) circ. /CO'UPOMNEN' INSPECTED SYST-M: RPV WELD i: .-C-5"2-A17 WELD TYPE: /VA -SP..... -" THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
3.2" MATERIAL:
CS COM-C.:E.NT TEMPERATURE: .LfE I 58 C-SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: 57. z ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: A/1A COUPL~a;T/
BATCH t: -)oIOTFLH ANGLE BEAM CIRC.: _ _/_EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indications YES NO NO YES I) Base Metal Straight Beam ____/ \ 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow v /,4 3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow ___//d I 4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW 5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW IVI/4 F if L 6) Straight Beam of Weld W 7) Thickness Across Weld Q Base Heza.T UP STRM WELD ON STR ADDITGONA.L COMMENTS S-AA, .-A/A SErr/-,,6-MAl mSTA/NE. 8O.% ,s14 BAcx  REV: STA_~~LEVEL:____
___CAT-DATE: IO-/"-C DATE: / -f/._ Y DATE:_________
Page 20 of 22 December, 1993 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 23/4.ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
L AL-5 uNr I, PAGE[- / OF. /
NDT- C-30 REV. .DATA SHEET NO.: [ 0- 20/ L3 DATE: !0-12-'?6 CALIBRATION SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: /t2,I ANGLE BEAM: axial C -Z'7 circ. __ -_____COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: $PV WELD 0: -CSz-IAV7 WELD TYPE: /Z- S/1....TPE"S IZ: -/ THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
3.622 MATERIAL:
CS COMPONENT TEMPERATURE:
76 0 p SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: _ N1, 1A ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: 6 05 0 BATCH #: NT/FE ANGLE BEAM CIRC.: 6o0.____EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indications YES NO NO YES i) Base Metal Straight Beam 1 f/A// \ 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow W" 3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow _4 /&#xb6;/ _4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW 5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW 7"" F L 6) Straight Beam of Weld / f/A 0 W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal UP STRM WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AiR) 5'0 5/IF7A'S CA N SF 7-7-/1/16 MA/)7141IAIAIE4
/oZ -3,0 /)o Ic L[(0) NO EXAMIWAATI Oe/ DL)'FQ Al NO R -a -Co~ 01V 1 6URALZOv XAM,1 rlE R: LEVEL: ~ DATE: 10-12-76 REVhrWER:
LEVEL:______
DATE:_______
OR,: -."' f LEVEL: DATE: /10-1-'-S A 1- rO: DATE: _L_1_ ',__A'; I3/4 DATE :3!
Page 20 of 22 December, 1993 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. fDT-C-30 Rev. 2 (ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT: I A A LLC uA/,T-r o PAGE::._;
OF /PROCEDURF:
NDT- C-30 REV. X_ DATA SHEET NO.: o- 2oi C. /o-I2-gl CALIBRATION SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: 0/A ANGLE BEAM: axial C-,V2Y circ. _ -_ _ _COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: APy WELD #: LCS-ZLA/7 WELD TYPE: A'?- 5/4 P PE&#xa2;' SI IZE: __ _--" THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
: 3. 62" MATERIAL:
C-5 COMPONENT TEMPERATURE:
74 s  SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: /V ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: 45. 6A COUPLANT/BATCH *: .-, .-s/e .56 ANGLE BEAM CIRC.: 65".EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indications YES NO NO YES 1 ) Base Metal Straight Beam V '/A// \ 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow 3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow 9 ,4//4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW V/5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW F L 6) Straight Beam of Weld , ,&1/4W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal .-#UP STRM WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS-SC/AJ 5E-77AI&V
/,IT-/A4AZ /RoO-L3 /1/oLL D Alo EAxM1VAT7, 7 0,&/, PVu 7-0o Al ,Z a Z a A-- 601.1F1 6- v,7-/0A EXAM.INER:
L' LEVEL: DATE: 16 -/2-q6? -. -E , ER: LEVEL: __ DATE: , DATEE: DATE: JL/-d GE Nuclear Energy Typical design for Top Head Nozzle LCS-2-N7 Exam coverage is limited due to the nozzle configuration REPORT NO.: b 2LPAGE:. OF: J GE REVIEWED BY LEVEL DATE UTILITY REVIEW AT SMAD REVIEW DATE 0.62.75%62.75%450 62.75%62.75%100.0%0.0%90.20%63.14%600 Exam Area 62.75% CW Circ scans 62.75% CCW Circ scans 100.0% Ax Down 0.0% Ax Up 94.30% Base Metal 63.96%Total composite coverage for Weld LCS-2-N7 = 63.28%
3.Page 20 of 22....December, 1993 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Prccedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SKEET NDT-DS-C2A i?-STATION/UNIT:
ZASALL- UNlT I T PAGE: / I OF PROCZE'IUPR:
NDT- C-3 0 REV.2 DATA SHEET NO.: 4 ;Z' DATit 10 12 -q CAL:BRAT:ON SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: (2 -'D ' ANGLE BEAM: axial L,, /7 -circ.COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: ,qpV WELD #: L.S-'-/' ,8 WELD TYPE: /VZ-SH-:z : " THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
: 3. 6;" MATERIAL:
C 5 COMPONENT TEMPERATURE:
?1, o t ?C SCA!N GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: 5-7? -dB ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: ___ _ _ _COUPLANT / 11411nA-rn<x BATCH #: ovo "ANGLE REAM CIRC.: 1/14 EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indicationx YES NO NO YES I) Base Metal Straight Beam 7 .,/ \ 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow w/3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow /4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW- 7 /5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW A11, L 6) Straight Beam of Weld -0 W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal UP STRM WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ACAA' Ai S V& MAItT-A/AEP 86 clt/ 8Ac& KFCLgCm-g LEVEL:. DATE: 12.-, RzV:-LEVEL:
ilL- DATE: /6'/0 ' ,-~ ~ S"VAW~ LEVEL:_ ___ D3ATE:/Q 9y______________________DATE:_
____
Page 20 of 22 December, 1993 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 WV 4'! 1 (ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
LA QLNT- ir 2>-. PAGE t" / OF PROCrDURF:
NDT- C-3 REV. .2- DATA SHEET NO.: 13-)0,/3 DAT-: io-iZ-gq CALIBRATION SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: A./IA ANGLE BEAM: axial _ -- __7 circ. z-5 F7 COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: RPV WELD #: IC5 -Z-A/8 WELD TYPE: Ala-511...ZE"SIZE : 2 THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
.MATERIAL:
C5 COMPONENT TEMPERATURE:
7*6 &deg;fr ! 5-8 78 SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: f/AV ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: 0, 0 JS COUPLANT/BATCH #: 6OMOTE-do
? -'W ANGLE BEAM CIRC.: (0 d C)8d EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indications YES NO NO YES-) Base Metal Straight Beam 7 v1A 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow 3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow 4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW 5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW 7 7 F L 6) Straight Beam of Weld 7 /./4 W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal A UP STRM WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS! q5 o s 5CAA) &A)Jy SET/7-1/6
/,41/A/ T7-AI4 E /o4-o% /39 1e-L Q)/V 0 EXw & -UWATI 01V PCUC- TO A1o?.R1-F 60 1C'1 A-776A!EXMNER: c~LEVEL: _______DATE:
J~~REVIEWER :
LEVEL: L DATE: /6. /5-2Y AT; i Z : 6 ] DAT: -/7'-LEVEL:D DATE: AU I ~ ~ ~ >-.A DATE: /r Page 20 of 22 December, 1993 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
LA5A/.-' L VA' I'N7- 4=*- ;2 PAGE.-&#xfd;_ / OF /PROCEDURE:
NDT- C-30 REV. 2_ DATA SHEET NO.: -2c C2 DA4i: 0. 1-2-gZ CALIBRATION SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: )//A ANGLE BEAM: axial 7--____ circ. _ -_f_COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: RPv WELD 1: LS2- /VL3 WELD TYPE: /V _ _ _/-/THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
: 3. 2" MATERIAL:
C.5 COMPONENT TEMPERATURE:
76 '. `&deg; B , SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: '/VA ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: 6 5 6 ,R COUPLANT/BATCH #: 501ONOF6, It 11714 ANGLE BEAM CIRC.: 65.6 1d6 EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indications YES NO NO YES i) Base Metal Straight Beam NIA 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow -I /3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow 6 v-' AIA 4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW v7 7 5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW V11 F L 6) Straight Beam of Weld 1V1,4 0--W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metai _UP STRM WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS/VAg;SCAN 5F7-7,/n6-
/1fIiy7TAN-I D %10% -301% ID 90LL-SAV O EXAmINiATIOAN Dv 7- N2 "a,- C..l,,,6-uZ,4.
E XAM INIE R: S4 r..L REV: E WE OTHER: STA:_ON-:6:-;
AN I:, LEVEL: 'IT-_ .DATE: lO-/;Z- LEVEL: _7_7 DATE: -fpO LEVEL: ? DATE:  O ATE: _____"-_i
__&#xfd;v&#xfd;3DATE:
3 -174' GE Nuclear Energy Typical design for Top Head Nozzle LCS-2-N8 Exam coverage is limited due to the nozzle configuration REPORT NO.:____o PAGE: / OF: GE REVIEWED BY LEVEL DATE UTILITY REVIEW DATE SMAD REVIEW DATE 0o 63.92%63.92%45" 63.92%63.92%100.0%0.0%91.45%63.86%60, Exam Area 63.92% CW Circ scans 63.92% CCW Circ scans 100.0% Ax Down 0.0% Ax Up 94.86% Base Metal 64.54%Total composite coverage for Weld LCS-2-N8 = 64.10%45 0 S Page-20 of 22 December, 19S COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 (ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA sETNDT-Ds-C2A STATION/UNIT:
PG.5A PAGI OiF /PROCEDURE:
NDT- C_ REV. .g DATA SHEET NO.: _ -__ ..__,_ DATE: 2o-f:2-1 CALIBRATION SHEET NO.($)ST. BEAM: (d -10 ANGLE BEAM: axial ,i/4 circ. /_.//4-/COMPONENT INSPECTED ,SXSTEM: :PV WELD 1: L _.C -.?-NIOA WELD TYPE: AVZ- /7-PIPE SIZE: &#xfd;IC THICKNESS/SCHEDULE-
: e. MATERIAL:
C5 0 WA COMPONENT TEMPERATURE:
-7e / 66 7.23 SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: _ _ _/A COUPLANT/
ANGLE BEAM CIRC.:/A BATCH *: u A~Jr7A &C6L f 953 ;!SAIA_EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam ____/ \ 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow NIA 3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow X A1/A 4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW X A 5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW , VI F-L 6) Straight Beam of Weld X 'W 7) Thickness Across Weld Q Base Metal I A/ I/VA A//A UP STRM WELD ON STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS-SCAtJ J3 Ref(C-c-r-S O ,AIL.)%A/O ?EC-Co-<ABLE
/Aj-D1CA,-tCtJ$
0' L_ eN ,-D, A L EXAMINER:
--LEVEL:______
DATE: /________REVIEWER:_______________
LEVEL: Z7ZZDATE:_______
OTHER: CA--4 ---LEVEL:_________
DATE:/1C -STAT ION.<2:: .- DATE: 1_________
ANI11: DATE: ti-91 1:
COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 Page 20 of 2 December, 19 (ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
ZAS,4LL1E_
AE4O PROCEDURE:
NDT-e30 REv. t. DATA SHEET NO.: -1 8 DATE: __".__'___
CALIBRATION SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: 4) 64. ANGLE axial c- cir. C /0 7 COMPONENT INSPECTED/PV WELD 0- 2CS-N.-W/IOA WELD TYPE: ,,_Z. _ _ _ _PIPE SIZE: 4'0 THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
6'g/"' MATERIAL:
CfS COMPONENT TEMPERATURE:
ZF S/V  SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: _ ______ ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: (.. ( d4 COUPLANT/
A B C. Ole BATCH if: ALTRAGEL tt, ~9S3-2S NLEM5RC:______
EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam II 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow .77 3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow 4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW 5) Anile Beam-Along Weld-CCW 7 _L 6) Straight Beam of Weld j ,/*w 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metai _ 4-A UP STRM WELD DN STR (ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.V'R X -5 .0. RD,44tE-L~eVCIf.5.
0 ~i A)VE-rAvj fLICt6 7Z) 100"46I-7 CV 5 2#t) (/CeR4T/10m 415 0 6HE EXA M EXAMINER:
I _ &#xfd;zLEVEL:-
DATE: A0_-__2:!r
__q REVIEWER:
LEVEL: 4Z1 DATE: ____2 ._OTHER: -,.e,' LEVEL: .DATE: /C-'-sTAT:O1,: _,__-___ADATE: q-01-11)
Page 20 of 22 December, 1993 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 (ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
LA 541-E uA417- f PAGE I /V OF /PROCEDURE:
NDT- C-30 REV. 2. DATA SHEET NO.: _DATE:
CALIBRATION SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: IA_ ANGLE BEAM: axial C -circ. -COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: PV WELD #: kCS.1-fL-i0 WELD TYPE: /V -5H&#xfd;PIfE SIZE: /O THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
6.99 MATERIAL:
C-COMPONENT TEMPERATURE:
788 v 16572-3 SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: 11, ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: e" q Js COUPLANT/
A BATCH #: ()ITgLr4E
-* 2 1S ANGLE BEAM CIRC.: _ _. _ _B EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam Al /A/ I\ 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow 7'3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow VIA Al/4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW 5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW .,-F L 6) Straight Beam of Weld VIA// _0 W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal 41 1 A'/A WI/A UP STRM WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS A/RI -(6)" sA.i~4.-$ G,'-1F7-/
OSF2VEP 8z-oj eE* r o/,q L9- LEVELS.SeA.4 G-A.) 5rn7-7wv6-s JEIp i/0 -Zo/o J-p -oL.o.I ~,, ,~REV7EWER: OTHER: ~ 1 IA-N: LEVEL: LEVEL: LEVEL: DATE:__________
DATE: /r(1 DATE- /" ZS'-%DATE: 10__ .___, DATE: __-_0______
GE Nuclear Energy Typical design for CRD Nozzle LCS-2-N1 OA Exam coverage is limited due to the nozzle configuration REPORT NO.: I)L~~ PAGEd- OF: GE REVIEWED BY LEVEL UTILITY REVIEW 0o 70.21%/02- 27-,;P DATE DATE 45.70.21%70.21%100.0%0.0%92.65%66.61%60&deg;70.21%70.21%100.0%0.0%95.96%Exam Area CW Circ scansCCW Circ scans Ax Down Ax Up Base Metal 67.27%70.21%Total composite coverage for Weld LCS-2-N10A
= 68.04%442Z_ //- 0 -7V SMAD REVIEW DATE Half Scale i, 60O 45&deg; S
,Page 20 of 22:JDecember, 1993 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Prccedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 (C..ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
L-A sAL -L IVT- *r 2 .PAGE: j- OF PROCEDURE:
NDT-C-3_ REV. -___ DATA SHEET NO.: F- DATi: -CAL:BRAT:ON SHEET NO.(S)ST. SEAM- C D2 /. ANGLE BEAM: axial ,t//z'&#xfd;- circ. _______CO:UPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: /)PV WELD #: L-CS- 2-VNIB WELD TYPE: A ai 5/9.Cl THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
: 3. 62" MATERIAL:
C5 COXPONENT TEMPERATURE: " s-s 78 SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: 5 d 2 t E ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: _ A/_A COUPLANT/
le"jix BATCH o: IO/ tC 7--cN / s ANGLE SEAM CIRC.: 1V1,4 EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam I--,4'/ \ 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow /V/A 3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow NIA 4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CWA 5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW A/IA FL 6) Straight Beam of Weld W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal}A UP STR.M WELD IDN STRJ ADDITIONAL COMMENTS Scf4^ C-AA) 5E,,/,AV6
/ o"IA lTVEb 80% FSH 4?Acie_ .-LEVEL: .DATE: /O -I)-X a :zWLEVEL: .i277 DATE:_ _____y'~ n: C 9~,7~4~ J>~'9~' LEVEL:-ZAT:
73 7 Coe. DAEATE:_____
____________________
f44&__ DATE: 3?~
COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 Page 20 of 22 December, 199.ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
LASALL A '/i/7-r lp- PAGEI; / OF (PROCDURE:
NDT- C-30 REV. -2 DATA SHEET NO.: -DAT, IQJ-12-L6 CALIBRATION SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: A))14 ANGLE BEAM: axial circ. ( o &#xfd; 7 COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: RpV WELD #: LCS-2-A118 WELD TYPE: /V -SH: THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
: 3. 2" MATERIAL:
C-COMPONENT TEMPERATURE: -kf 4 P 58 78 SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: /1/A ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: 6o.o0 J/COUPLANT/
ANL B BATCH #:
# ANGLE BEAM CIRC. : __ .___-EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam V V/I/ \ 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow V", 3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow C N$ A 4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW 77 5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW 7 , FL 6) Straight Beam of Weld -,wq 0 W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal 'I ---UP STRM WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AJ) R ~ 5 d/~S-AcA &AjV SFT7-T-J)A6 MIA/AITA/I&#xa3;)
I0%"- 36% Ii) ROLL Al /nO EXAM I IJATWA/ DuE Tt I'40?-LE C0AJ/PC..fZATION EXAMINER:
L a LEVEL: DATE:_,_-,_-__
REVIEWER:
LEVEL: -DATE: /142 /,T-OTHER: g l-l...---
J,"- V LEVEL: DATE: /9 -3/1 -,9 ANI:: -6, DATE: >-! ,)-----------
' ,< 7 -- _
Page 20 of 22 December, 1993 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Procedure No. NDT-C-30 Rev. 2 ULTRASONIC TESTING DATA SHEET NDT-DS-C2A STATION/UNIT:
LA6ALLAE U IV I 2 PAGE ] OF PROCEDURE-NDT- 3-0 REV. 2- DATA SHEET NO.: D- :=1,3 C. DATi: /2-2-.CALIBRATION SHEET NO.(S)ST. BEAM: A64 ANGLE BEAM:
axial ( 9'2 circ. (2-6 COMPONENT INSPECTED SYSTEM: RPy WELD #: LC.S-2-AiIB WELD TYPE: ^/- SH PIPE SIZE: 5 THICKNESS/SCHEDULE:
3.62" MATERIAL:
CS COMPONENT TEMPERATURE:
71LF ow I578 SCAN GAIN CONTROL SETTINGS STRAIGHT BEAM: /V14 ANGLE BEAM AXIAL: d8. 6 o COUPLANT/
/ &-, ,-c BATCH #: 56O 6b7"-H *1-9sis ANGLE BEAM CIRC.: b. &#xa3; dS EXAMINATION SCANS Performed Indications YES NO NO YES 1) Base Metal Straight Beam/ \ 2) Angle Beam-Normal-Against Flow 3) Angle Beam-Normal-With Flow 'vIA 4) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CW V 5) Angle Beam-Along Weld-CCW F L 6) Straight Beam of Weld /0 W 7) Thickness Across Weld & Base Metal AUP STRM WELD DN STR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS-ScAN &-AiN SEMN7A6- /IAIW1?_4/,VETD 1001o30%-
1pIoLL CD /N0 EXAAlINA~nav D)UE-T NOaiL-EXAMINER:
L ? /j.e LEVEL:- DATE: .6- g REVIEWER:
LEVEL: I DATE: /0. /-S-,'OTHER: .'LEVEL: DATE:- e&deg;-3'/STATION: " 6. &#xfd;&#xfd; DATE: E-7 .ANII: IIl _ DATE:
0GE Nuclear Energy=.-Typical design for Top Head Nozzle LCS-2-N1 8 Exam coverage is limited due to the nozzle configuration REPORT NO.: i&z- 'c3 P GE:ot OF:I GE REVIEWED BY LEVEL DATE UTILITY REVIEW DATE 00 62.75%62.75%450 62.75%62.75%100.0%0.0%90.20%63.14%60&deg;62.75%62.75%100.0%0.0%94.30%Exam Area CW Circ scans CCW Circ scans Ax Down Ax Up Base Metal 63.96%Total composite coverage for Weld LCS-2-N18
= 63.28%SMAD REVIEW DATE 60 0 S a GE NUCLEAR ENERGY EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET LaSalle Unit 2 L2R08 LCS-2-N1B Component ID: 21.0039 Line ID: N-SH Configuration:
RPV System: B-D ASME Cat.: Examination Cert Exam Exams Data Cal Procedure Calibration Personnel Level Completed Performed Sheet Sheet Revision Block Paul Hayes 11 11/15/00 0 0 L D-070 D-070 UT-DRD-300V3 R.1 01-92-01 Credit 45 0 S D-071 D-071 UT-DRD-300V3 R.A 01-92-01 60 0 S D-072 D-072 UT-DRD-300V3 R.A 01-92-01 Section XI Examination Results: Manual ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME Section Xl, 1989 Edition, No Addenda and Regulatory Guide 1.150.Examinations were performed from the vessel wall with 00, 450 and 600 search units. The angle beamexaminations were performed transverse and parallel to the weld.No recordable indications were detected.60.4% coverage of the examination volume was obtained.Examination results were compared to data report 303,306,309 from L2R02 outage with X No Change These examinations were performed under Work Order: N/A Change This Summary and the following data sheets have been reviewed and accepted by the folloiving personnel:
RWP: 2221..Dose: 80 mr.GE Reviewed By: Level: Date: Station Reviewed By: Title: Date: Reviewed By: Level: Date: ANII By: Title: Date: Page 1 of 7 La Salle Unit 2 NI Nozzle 00 wm 450 T-scan 60' T-scan 45' P-scan CW 600 P-scan CW 45' P-scan CCW 60' P-scan CCWCROSS SECTIONAL AREA (per slice) TOTAL CODE COVERAGE code cross area area % of code area % of code area degrees degrees percent percent sectional scanned scanned scanned scanned scanned scanned scanned scanned area automated manually automated manually automated manually automated manually 60.1 0.0 25.5 0.0 42.4 0.0 360.0 0.0 42.4 60.1 0,0 44.4 0.0 73.9 0.0 360.0 0.0 73.9 60.1 0.0 48.9 0.0 81.4 0.0 360.0 0.0 81.4 60.1 0.0 31.2 0.0 51.9 0.0 360.0 0.0 51.9 60.1 0.0 36.5 0.0 60.7 0.0 360.0 0.0 60.7 60.1 0.0 31.2 0.0 51.9 0.0 360,0 0.0 51.9 60.1 0.0 36.5 0.0 60.7 0.0 360.0 0.0 60.7 0.0 Manual scans were not restricted.
No credit taken for initial 1/4" of material in Code coverage calculations due to near field effects..60.4 60.4%Total Composite Coverage =,&#xfd; 2- R -042 /.01 .1 rr7 r. Zi -?6'. ,
Lasalle 2 Recirculation Outlet N 1 Nozzle 0O L-wove wel d metal, 45* and 60* T-scan coverage 60"T R 9- p"-6z7-7 2&#xfd; -eL Lasalle 2 Recirculation Outlet N1 Nozzle 45" and 60&deg; P-scan coverage/I 45TP L'Z7 ~ (P ~cu EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET Report No: GE NUCLEAR ENERGY LaSalle Unit 2 L2R08 2R8-002 LCS-2-N6A 21.0061 N-SH RPV B-DComponent ID:
Line ID: Configuration:
System: ASME Cat.: Examination Cert Exam Exams Data Cal Procedure Calibration Personnel Level Completed Performed Sheet Sheet Revision Block Paul Hayes 11 11/16/00 0 0 L D-096 D-096 UT-DRD-300V3 R.1 01-92-01-Credit 450S D-097 D-097 UT-DRD-300V3 R.1 01-92-01 60 0 S 0-098 D-098 UT-DRD-300V3 R.1 01-92-01 Section XI Examination Results: Manual ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME Section X1, 1989 Edition, No Addenda and Regulatory Guide 1.150.Examinations were performed from the vessel wall with 0&deg;, 450 and 600 search units. The angle beam examinations were performed transverse and parallel to the weld.No recordable indications were detected.68.4% coverage of the examination volume was obtained.Examination results were compared to data report D457 from L2R03 outage with X No Change These examinations were performed under Work Order: 990139382 N/A Change This Summary and the following data sheets have been reviewed and accepted by the following personnel:
RWP: 2221____ ___ -p___ Dose: -~240 mr.GE Reviewed By: Level: Date: Station Reviewed By: Title: Date: Reviewed By: Level: Date: ANII, iewed By: Title: Date: Page 1 -of _7 I, La Salie Unit 2 N6 Nozzle 00 wm 45' T-scan 60' T-scan 45' P-scan CW 600 P-scan CW 45' P-scan CCW 600 P-scan CCW CROSS SECTONAL AREA (per slice) TOTAL CODE COVERAGE code cross area area % of code area % of code area degrees degrees percent percent sectional scanned scanned scanned scanned scanned scanned scanned scanned area automated manually automated manually automated manually automated manually 58.7 0.0 30.1 0.0 51.3 0.0 360.0 0.0 51.3 58.7 0.0 47.5 0.0 80.9 0.0 360.0 0.0 80.9 58J7 0.0 50.5 0.0 86.0 0.0 360.0 0.0 86.0 58.7 0.0 34:8 0.0 59.3 0.0 360.0 0.0 59.3 58.7 0.0 41.6 0.0 70.9 0.0 360.0 0.0 70.9 58.7 0.0 34.8 0.0 59.3 0.0 360.0 0,0 59.3 58.7 0.0 41.6 0.0 70.9 0.0 360.0 0.0 70.9 0.0 68.4 Manual scans were not restricted.
No credit taken for initial 1/4" of material in Code coverage calculations due to near field effects.Total Composite Coverage =68.4%"IRYo 0Z 7Pm_ ; /ca7 o2/- 'o Lasalle 2 LPCI N6 Nozzle 0. L-wove weld metal, 45" and 60" T-scan coverage f I 60*T O"L 6c<Z~R8-c2~22~~
77? I' /
Lasalle 2 LPCI N6 Nozzle 45" and 60" P-scan coverage I 2R2-aO'Z 7 i//li /'cc alf" t -/f'G1C EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET Report No: GE NUCLEAR ENERGY LaSalle Unit 2 L2R08 2R8-003 LCS-2-N6C 21.0063 N-SH RPV B-D Component ID: Line ID: Configuration:
System: ASME Cat.:Examination Cert Exam Exams Data Cal Procedure Calibration Personnel Level Completed Performed Sheet Sheet Revision Block Jason Breza 11 11/17/00 0&deg;L D-093 D-093 UT-DRD-300V3 R.1 01-92-01
' , .1 Credit 45 0 S D-094 D-094 UT-DRD-300V3 R.1 01-92-01 60 0 S D-095 D-095 UT-DRD-300V3 R.1 01-92-01 Section XI Examination Results:Manual ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME Section Xl, 1989 Edition, No Addenda and Regulatory Guide 1.150.Examinations were performed from the vessel wall with 00, 450 and 600 search units. The angle beam examinations were performed transverse and parallel to the weld.No recordable indications were detected.68.4% coverage of the examination volume was obtained.Examination results were compared to data report D454 from L2R03 outage with X No Change These examinations were performed under Work Order: 990139382 N/A Change This Summary and the following data sheets have been reviewed and accepted by the following personnel:
RWP: 2221A -RWPDose: 300_ mr.GE Reviewed By: Level: Date: Station Reviewed By: Title: Date: Reviewed By: Level: Date: ANII RV wed By: Title: Date: Page 1 of La Salle Unit 2 N6 Nozzle 0, wm 450 T-scan 60' T-scan 450 P-scan CW 60' P-scan CW 450 P-scan CCW 600 P-scan CCW CROSS SECTIONAL AREA (per slice) TOTAL CODE COVERAGEcode cross area area % of code area % of code area degrees degrees percent percent sectional scanned scanned scanned scanned scanned scanned scanned scanned area automated manually automated manually automated manually automated manually 58.7 0.0 30.1 0.0 51.3 0.0 360.0 0.0 51.3 58.7 0.0 47.5 0.0 80.9 0.0 360.0 0.0 80.9 58.7 0.0 50.5 0.0 86.0 0.0 360.0 0.0 86.0 58.7 0.0 34.8 0.0 59.3 0.0 360.0 0.0 59.3 58.7 0.0 41.6 0.0 70.9 0.0 360.0 0.0 70.9 58.7 0.0 34.8 0.0 59.3 0.0 360.0 0.0 59.3 58.7 0.0 41.6 0.0 70.9 0.0 360.0 0.0 70.9 0.0 Manual scans were not restricted.
No credit taken for initial 1/4" of material in Code coverage calculations due to near field effects.68.4 68.4%Total Composite Coverage =P, e J- -7 64A~A.~ (' ~ -~, 11 /Zt). ,st&#xfd; 11-;13 -00 &#xfd;xvff)
Lasalle 2 LPCI N6 Nozzle 0* L-wave weld metal, 45" and 60" T-scan coverage I O'L 60"T 1 /4 n5' Lasalle 2 LPCI N6 Nozzle 45" and 60" P-scan coverage/I I-7 RE7
~GE NUCLEAR ENERGY UT EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET Summary No: 2R9-012 WO No: 430431 PROJECT LaSalle Unit 2 WELD ID: LCS-2-N4A SYSTEM: RPV N4A N-SH INITIAL CALIBRATION ID: NOZ.IN, NOZ.70.IN FINAL CALIBRATION ID: NOZ.OUT, NOZ.70.OUT GERIS DATA: n4a.70.1, n4a.tI.1, n4a.tl.2, n4a.pl.1, n4a.p2.1-2MANUALD tA: N/A OPERATORS:
M. Hilborn Lv II; L. Benicki Lv II; CE Frakes Lv II; J.Guillote Lv II Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code Section XI, 1989 Edition no Addenda, also Section XI, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PDI program description and the Federal Register, Part II, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 50 for Category B-D Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) Assembly Welds.
Automated transverse and parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure GE-UT-705 V2, using 450 Shear wave, 600 RL, and 700 RL search units, 0' L-Wave supplemental scans were also performed.
Automated scanning was performed from the nozzle OD surface, 3600 around the nozzle, with no restrictions.
For initial calibrations refer to report G2K-CAL-1.
For final calibrations refer to report G2K-CAL-3.
The GERIS 2000 00 automated UT system 0&deg; reference is located at 90&deg; CW of nozzle TDC.The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded no indications.
450 S / T-scan, No recordable indications.
600 RL / T-scan, No recordable indications.
450 S / P1-scan, No recordable indications.
450 S / P2-scan, No recordable indications.
700 RL / T-scan, No recordable indications.
70&deg; RL / P-ccw No recordable indications.
70&deg; RL / P-cw No recordable indications.
Automated Composite Coverage =
78.1%By DATE REVIEWED BY DATE UTILITY REVI DATE UT Level _"&#xfd;v --03 UT Level.= T-- &#xfd; 4 (.03J _I ~I' / 3 1-LaSalle Unit-2, 2RO9 Page I of_. I Summary No.: 2R9-012 LaSalle Unit-2 Weld LCS-2-N4A Spring 2003 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE" Percent Weld Length = 360. Required Exam Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent Exam Volume = 59. Area Sq. In. Auto Auto Auto Auto 70* T-Scan A 11.4 5.6 9.5% 360 4.7%450 T-Scan A 39.1 33.5 56.8% 360 28.4%600 T-Scan A 8.5 8.5 14.4% 360 7.2%70&deg; P-Scan A 11.4 4.9 8.3% 360 4.2%450 P-Scan A 39.1 31.2 52.9% 360 26.4%IRS P-Scan A 8.5 8.5 14.4% 360 7.2%70' T-Scan 450 T-Scan 60&deg; T-Scan 700 P-Scan 450 P-Scan IRS P-Scan 70&deg; T-Scan _450 T-Scan 60' T-Scan 70' P-Scan 450 P-Scan IRS P-Scan% Total Composite Coverage =78.1%Comments:
A -Examined 360*. Scanning limited due to nozzle configuration.
Note -Rounding methods may make calculated values appear in error.LaSalle Unit-2, 2RO9 Page S" of IL C...2'LaSalle Unit-2 Feedwater 700 Exam Volume = 11.4 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume = 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 607T) = 8.5 Sq. In.70' T-Scan achieved = 5.6 Sq. In.45&deg; T-Scan achieved = 33.5 Sq. In.60&deg; T-Scan achieved = 8.5 Sq. In.70'T 45r I I 60"T I X F---LaSalle Unit-2 Feedwater 70' Exam Volume = 11.4 Sq. In.45&deg; Exam Volume = 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 60"T) = 8.5 Sq. In.70&deg; P-Scan achieved = 4.9 Sq. In.45&deg; P-Scan achieved = 31.2 Sq. In.IRS P-Scan achieved = 8.5 Sq. In.70*P 45&deg;P / IRS Ct I 7===d LaSalle 2 GL, ,L6-JG1.xls GOD-SL6E LaSalle 2 NOZZLE EXAMINATION PLAN -1/21/2003 Feedwater GERIS-2000 NOZZLE-TO-VESSEL SCANNING LIMITS 5-NOZOD 26.25 VSLIR 126.69 1 WALL 6.44 WELD RAD 17.25 ODBR 3.56 TYPE F (F-FLANGE OR B-BARREL)Delay INDEX INDEX STEP RADIAL DISTANCE AGATE BE GATE C GATE FIXTURE CPU CH ANGLE TYPE usec X Y DEG INCHES INCHES START STOP STOP START STOP STOP ANGLE ANGLE 1 0.00 W 3.66 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.317 0.150 0 18.97 88 54 -2 45.0' T 13.26 3.00 0.00 0.8' 0.411 0.150 0 13.12 235 -7.3 -7730 3 60.0' T 14.15 -3.00 0.00 0.80 0.490 0.150 0 18.97 185 353,9&deg; 6.10 4/6 45.0' P1 13.26 3.00 0.00 0.80 0.336 0.150 0 10.00 235 298.00 62.00 (ccw)5/7 45.0* P1 13.26 -3.00 0.00 0.8&deg; 0.336 0.150 0 10.00 235 62.0' -62.00 (cw)416 45.0* P2 13.26 3.00 0.00 0.80 0.336 0.150 0 10.00 235 ---321.3' 38.70 (ccw)5/7 45,0' P2 13.26 -3.00 0.00 0.80 0.336 0.150 0 10.00 235 ---38.70 -38.70 (cw)1 70.00 T 12,00 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.380 0.150 0 10.87 52 ---0.00 0.0&deg;2 70.0' P 12,00 3.00 0.00 0.80 0.313 0.150 0 6.25 52 ---287.20 72.8' (ccw)3 70.0' P 12.00 -3.00 0.00 0.80 0.313 0.150 0 6.25 52 ---72.80 -72.8* (cw)1 49.0&deg; Z1R 17.48 2.50 0.00 1.70 0.500 0.070 60 90 395 ---335,50 24.50 (ccw)2 49.0' ZIR 17,48 -2.50 0.00 1.70 0.500 0.070 60 90 395 ---24.50 -24.50 (cw)1. 68.00 Z2A 17.28 2.50 0.00 1.70 0.500 0.070 50 90 281 ---348.40 11.60 (ccw)2 68.00 Z2A 17.28 -2.50 0.00 1.70 0.500 0.070 50 90 281 ---11.60 -11.6* (cw)2 30.00 Z2B 17.28 2.50 0.00 1.50 0.354 0.070 --237 ---300.00 600 (cw)1 30.00 Z2B 17.28 -2.50 0.00 1.50 0.354 0.070 -237 ---60.00 -60.00 (ccw)2 20.00 Z3 17.28 2.50 0.00 1.50 0.354 0.070 -188 ---270.00 90.0o (cw)1 20.00 Z3 17.28 -2.50 0.00 1.50 0.354 0.070 -188 ---90.0o -90.00 (ccw)-- 1/29/2003
~GE NUCLEAR ENERGY UT EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET Summary No: 2R9-013 WO No: 430431 PROJECT LaSalle Unit 2 WELD ID: LCS-2-N4B SYSTEM: RPV N4B N-SH INITIAL CALIBRATION ID: NOZ.IN, NOZ.70.1N FINAL CALIBRATION ID: NOZ.OUT, NOZ.70.OUT GERIS DATA: n4b.tl.1, n4b.pl.1, n4b.p2.1, n4b.70.1, n4b.70.2 ,.-.,MANUALbTA.>''
N/A OPERATORS:
M. Hilborn Lv II; L. Benicki Lv II; CE Frakes Lv II; J.Guillote Lv II Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code Section XI, 1989 Edition no Addenda, also Section XI, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PDI program description and the Federal Register, Part II, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 50 for Category B-D Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) Assembly Welds.Automated transverse and parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure GE-UT-705 V2, using 450 Shear wave, 600 RL, and 70&deg; RL search units, 0&deg; L-Wave supplemental scans were also performed.
Automated scanning was performed from the nozzle OD surface, 360' around the nozzle, with no restrictions.
For initial calibrations refer to report G2K-CAL-1.
For final calibrations refer to report G2K-CAL-3, The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system 0' reference is located at 900 CW of nozzle TDC.The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded no indications.
450 S / T-scan, No recordable indications.
600 RL / T-scan, No recordable indications.
450 S / P1-scan, No recordable indications.
450 S / P2-scan, No recordable indications.
70&deg; RL / T-scan, No recordable indications.
700 RL / P-ccw No recordable indications.
70&deg; RL / P-cw No recordable indications.
Automated Composite Coverage = 78.1%.I Qi LaSalle Unit-2, 2RO9 Page I of A Sommary No.: 2R9-013 LaSalle Unit-2 Weld LCS-2-N4B Spring 2003 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Percent Weld Length = 360. Required Exam Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent Exam Volume = 59. Area Sq. In. Auto Auto Auto Auto 70' T-Scan A 11.4 5.6 9.5% 360 4.7%450 T-Scan A 39.2 33.5 56.8% 360 28.4%60&deg; T-Scan A 8.5 8.5 14.4% 360 7.2%70&deg; P-Scan A 11.4 4.9 8.3% 360 4.2%450 P-Scan A 39.2 31.2 52.9% 360 26.4%IRS P-Scan A 8.5 8.5 14.4% 360 7.2%70' T-Scan 45' T-Scan 60&deg; T-Scan 700 P-Scan 450 P-Scan IRS P-Scan 70' T-Scan 450 T-Scan " 60&deg; T-Scan 70' P-Scan 450 P-Scan IRS P-Scan% Total Composite Coverage =78.1%Comments:
A -Examined 360'. Scanning limited due to nozzle configuration.
Note -Rounding methods may make calculated values appear in error.LaSalle Unit-2, 2RO9 Page _ of I_
LaSalle Unit-2 Feedwater 700 Exam Volume = 11.4 Sq. In.45&deg; Exam Volume = 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 60'T) = 8.5 Sq. In.70&deg; T-Scan achieved = 5.6 Sq. In.450 T-Scan achieved = 33.5 Sq. In.600 T-Scan achieved = 8.5 Sq. In.70"T 451T I I 60"T zo&#xfd;/I-----I -~LaSalle Unit-2 Feedwater 700 Exam Volume = 11.4 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume = 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 607T) = 8.5 Sq. In.70' P-Scan achieved = 4.9 Sq. In.45' P-Scan achieved = 31.2 Sq. In.IRS P-Scan achieved = 8.5 Sq. In.70"P 45P I IRS I I 1//B I LaSalle 2 GL .L6-JG1.xls 9.,.GOD-SL6E LaSalle 2 NOZZLE EXAMINATION PLAN , .1/2112003 Feedwater GERIS.2000 NOZZLE-TO-VESSEL SCANNING LIMITS NOZOD 26.25 VSLIR 126.69 WALL 6.44 WELD RAD 17.25 ODBR 3.56 TYPE F (F-FLANGE OR B-BARREL)Delay INDEX INDEX STEP RADIAL DISTANCE AGATE BE GATE C GATE FIXTURE CPU CH ANGLE TYPE usec X Y DEG INCHES INCHES START STOP STOP START STOP STOP ANGLE ANGLE 1 0.00 W 3.66 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.317 0.150 0 18.97 88 54 -2 45.00 T 13.26 3.00 0.00 0.80 0.411 0.150 0 13.12 235 --7.33 -7.3 3 60.00 T 14.15 -3.00 0.00 0.80 0.490 0.150 0 18.97 185 --353.90 6.10 4/6 45*0O P1 13.26 3.00 0.00 0.80 0.336 0.150 0 10.00 235 298.00 62.00 (ccw)5/7 45.0' P1 13.26 -3.00 0.00 0.80 0.336 0.150 0 10.00 235 ---62.00 -62.0' (cw)4/6 45.0' P2 13.26 3.00 0.00 0.80 0.336 0.150 0 10.00 235 ---321.30 38.70 (ccw) 5/7 45.0* P2 13.26 -3.00 0.00 0.80 0.336 0.150 0 10.00 235 ---38.70 -38.70 (cw)1 70.00 T 12.00 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.380 0.150 0 10.87 52 ---0.00 0.0&deg;2 70.00 P 12.00 3.00 0.00 0.80 0.313 0.150 0 6.25 52 ---287.20 72.80 (ccw)3 70.00 P 12.00 -3.00 0.00 0.80 0.313 0.150 0 6.25 52 ---72.80 -72.8* (cw)1 49.0 ZIR 17.48 2.50 0.00 1.70 0.500 0.070 60 90 395 I33550 24.50 (cw)2 49.0' Z1R 17.48 -2.50 0.00 1.70 0.500 0.070 60 90 395 ---24.50 -24.5&deg; (cw)1 68.00 Z2A 17.28 2.50 0.00 1.70 0.500 0.070 50 90 281 ---348.4 11.60 (cow)2 68.00 Z2A 17.28 -2.50 0.00 1.70 0.500 0.070 50 90 281 ---11.60 -11.6' (cw)2 30.00 Z2B 17.28 2.50 0.00 1.50 0.354 0.070 5 90 237 --11300.0 60.00 (cw)1 30.00 Z2B 17.28 -2.50 0.00 1.50 0.354 0.070 --237 --60.00 -60.00 (cw)2 20.00 Z3 17.28 2.50 0.00 1.50 0.354 0.070 -188 -270.00 90.00 (cw)1 20.00 Z3 17.28 -2.50 0.00 1.50 0.354 0.070 -188 -90.00 -90.0, (ccw)1/29/2003 GE NUCLEAR ENERGY ( UT EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET Summary No: 2R9-014 WO No: 430431 PROJECT LaSalle Unit 2 WELD ID: LCS-2-N4C SYSTEM: RPV N4C N-SH INITIAL CALIBRATION ID: NOZ.IN, NOZ.70.IN FINAL CALIBRATION ID: NOZ.OUT, NOZ.70.OUT GERIS DATA: n4c.ti.1, n4c.ti.3, n4c.pl.1, n4c.p2.1, n4c.p2.2, n4c.70.1"-MANUALDATU A N/A OPERATORS:
M. Hilborn Lv II; L. Benicki Lv II; CE Frakes Lv II; J.Guillote Lv II Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code Section XI, 1989 Edition noAddenda, also Section X1, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PDI program description and the Federal Register, Part II, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 50 for Category B-D Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) Assembly Welds Automated transverse and parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure GE-UT-705 V2, using 450 Shear wave, 600 RL, and 700 RL search units, 00 L-Wave supplemental scans were also performed.
Automated scanning was performed from the nozzle OD surface, 360* around the nozzle, with no restrictions.
For initial calibrations refer to report G2K-CAL-1.
For final calibrations refer to report G2K-CAL-3.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system 0&deg; reference is located at 90* CW of nozzle TDC.The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded no indications, S.450 S / T-scan, No recordable indications.
600 RL / T-scan, No recordable indications.
450 S / P1-scan, No recordable indications.
450 S / P2-scan, No recordable indications.
70&deg; RL / T-scan, No recordable indications.
70&deg; RL / P-ccw No recordable indications.
7A0 RL I P-cw No recordable indications.
Automated Composite Coverage = 78.1%.&#xfd;1 LaSalle Unit-2, 2RO9 Page I of q Su.mmary No.: 2R9-014 LaSalle Unit-2 Weld LCS-2-N4C Spring 2003 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE'Percent Weld Length = 360. Required Exam Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent Exam Volume = 59. Area Sq. In. Auto Auto Auto Auto 70* T-Scan A 11.4 5.6 9.5% 360 4.7%450 T-Scan A 39.2 33.5 56.8% 360 28.4%60' T-Scan A 8.5 8.5 14.4% 360 7.2%70' P-Scan A 11.4 4.9 8.3% 360 4.2%450 P-Scan A 39.2 31.2 52.9% 360 26.4%IRS P-Scan A 8.5 8.5 14.4% 360 7.2%70&deg; T-Scan 450 T-Scan 600 T-Scan 700 P-Scan 450 P-Scan IRS P-Scan 700 T-Scan 450 T-Scan 600 T-Scan 700 P-Scan 450 P-Scan IRS P-Scan 9/6 1 otal Composite Coverage =[U. I 7o Comments:
A -Examined 360&deg;. Scanning limited due to nozzle configuration.
Note -Rounding methods may make calculated values appear in error.LaSalle Unit-2, 2RO9 Page 3 of _q LaSalle Unit-2 Feedwater 70&deg; Exam Volume = 11.4 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume = 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 60&deg;T) = 8.5 Sq. In.70&deg; T-Scan achieved = 5.6 Sq. In.45' T-Scan achieved = 33.5 Sq. In.600 T-Scan achieved = 8.5 Sq. In.70'T 457 60T I I I I I LaSalle Unit-2 Feedwater 70&deg; Exam Volume = 11.4 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume = 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 60 0 T) = 8.5 Sq. In.70' P-Scan achieved = 4.9 Sq. In.450 P-Scan achieved = 31.2 Sq. In.IRS P-Scan achieved = 8.5 Sq. In.70"P 45"P I IRS I I I I LaSalle 2 GC L6-JG1 .xIs GOD-SL6E LaSalle 2 NOZZLE EXAMINATION PLAN 1/21/2003 Feedwater GERIS-2000 NOZZLE-TO-VESSEL SCANNING LIMITS NOZOD 26.25 VSLIR 126.69 WALL 6,44 WELD RAD 17.25 ODBR 3.56 TYPE F (F-FLANGE OR B-BARREL)Delay INDEX INDEX STEP RADIAL DISTANCE AGATE BE GATE C GATE FIXTURE CPU CH ANGLE TYPE usec X Y DEG INCHES INCHES START STOP STOP START STOP STOP ANGLE ANGLE 1 0.0&deg; W 3.66 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.317 0.150 0 18.97 88 54 -2 45.0' T 13.26 3.00 0.00 0.80 0.411 0.150 0 13.12 235 --7.3&deg; -7.3*3 60.00 T 14.15 -3.00 0.00 0.8&deg; 0.490 0.150 0 18.97 185 --353.9* 6.10 4/6 45.00 P1 13.26 3.00 0.00 0.8&deg; 0.336 0.150 0 10.00 235 -298.0 62.00 (cow)5/7 45.0' P1 13.26 -3.00 0.00 0.80 0.336 0.150 0 10.00 235 -62.0&deg; -62.0' (cw)4/6 45.0' P2 13.26 3.00 0.00 0.80 0.336 0.150 0 10.00 235 --321.30 38.70 (cow)5/7 45,00 P2 13.26 -3.00 0.00 0.80 0.336 0.150 0 10.00 235 --38.70 -38.7' (cw)1 70.00 T 12.00 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.380 0.150 0 10.87 52 --0.00 0.00 2 70,00 P 12.00 3.00 0.00 0.80 0.313 0.150 0 6.25 52 --287.20 72.8&deg; (ccw)3 70,0* P 12.00 -3.00 0.00 0.80 0.313 0.150 0 6.25 52 --72.80 -72.8&deg; (cw)1 49.00 ZIR 17.48 2.50 0.00 1.7I 0.500 0.070 60 90 395 335.5 24.50 (ccw)2 49.0' Z1R 17.48 -2.50 0.00 1.7' 0.500 0.070 60 90 395 --24.50 &#xf7;24.5&deg; (cw)1 68.00 Z2A 17.28 2.50 0.00 1.70 0.500 0.070 50 90 281 --348.4 11.60 (cow)2 68.00 Z2A 17.28 -2.50 0.00 1.7' 0.500 0.070 50 90 281 --11.6&deg; 11.6&deg; (cw)2 30,00 Z2B 17.28 2.50 0.00 1.50 0.354 0.070 --237 --300.00 60.00 (cw)1 30.0' Z2B 17.28 -2.50 0.00 1.50 0.354 0.070 -237 60.00 -60.0, (ccw)2 20.00 Z3 17.28 2.50 0.00 1.50 0.354 0.070 -188 270.0' 90.00 (cw)1 20.0&deg; Z3 17.28 -2.50 0.00 1,5&deg; 0354 0.070 188 90.00 -90.0&deg; (ccw)1/29/2003 GE NUCLEAR ENERGY ( W UT EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET Summary No: 2R9-015 WO No: 430431 PROJECT LaSalle Unit 2 WELD ID: LCS-2-N4D SYSTEM: RPV N4D N-SH INITIAL CALIBRATION ID: NOZIN, NOZ.70.IN FINAL CALIBRATION ID: NOZ.OUT, NOZ.70.OUT GERIS DATA: n4d.tl.1, n4d.70.1, n4d.70.2, n4d.pl.1, n4d.pl.2, n4d.p2.1 MAKUAL DTA N/A OPERATORS:
M. Hilborn Lv II; L. Benicki Lv II; CE Frakes Lv II; J.Guillote Lv II Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code Section X1, 1989 Edition no Addenda, also Section Xl, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PDI program description and the Federal Register, Part II, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 50 for Category B-D Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) Assembly Welds Automated transverse and parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure GE-UT-705 V2, using 45&deg; Shear wave, 60' RL, and 70' RL search units, 0&deg; L-Wave supplemental scans were also performed.
Automated scanning was performed from the nozzle OD surface, 3600 around the nozzle, with no restrictions.
For initial calibrations refer to report G2K-CAL-1.
For final calibrations refer to report G2K-CAL-3.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system 0' reference is located at 90* CW of nozzle TDC.(- The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded ten (10) indications.
450 S / T-scan, One (1) acceptable indication.
60&deg; RL / T-scan, No recordable indications.
450 S / P1-scan, Four (4) acceptable indications.
450 S / P2-scan, Four (4) acceptable indications.
70* RL / T-scan, One (1) acceptable indication.
70' RL / P-ccw No recordable indications.
70&deg; RL / P-cw No recordable indications.
The indications recorded above have no determinable through wall dimension and are acceptable to the requirements of IWB-3000.Automated Composite Coverage = 78.1%P, EPARED BY DATE REVIEWED BY DATE l1rITPIR IE)V7 'DATE ANII REVIEW DATE UTLevel: 7i-. .- UTLevel:=7
-7 LaSalle Unit-2, 2R09 Page I of 21
__1 Summary No.: 2R9-015 LaSalle Unit-2 Weld LCS-2-N4D Spring 2003 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Percent Weld Length = 360. Required Exam Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent Exam Volume 59. Area Sq. In. Auto Auto Auto Auto 700 T-Scan A 11.4 5.6 9.5% 360 4.7%450 T-Scan A 39.2 33.5 56.8% 360 28.4%600 T-Scan A 8.5 8.5 14.4% 360 7.2%70' P-Scan A 11.4 4.9 8.3% 360 4.2%450 P-Scan A 39.2 31.2 52.9% 360 26.4%IRS P-Scan A 8.5 8.5 14.4% 360 7.2%700 T-Scan 450 T-Scan 600 T-Scan 700 P-Scan _450 P-Scan IRS P-Scan 700 T-Scan 450 T-Scan 60' T-Scan 700 P-Scan 450 P-Scan IRS P-Scan% Total Composite Coverage =78.1%Comments:
A -Examined 3600. Scanning limited due to nozzle configuration.
Note -Rounding methods may make calculated values appear in error.LaSalle Unit-2, 2RO9 Page _ t of_ ___
4 LaSalle Unit-2 Feedwater 700 Exam Volume = 11.4 Sq. In.45&deg; Exam Volume = 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 60&deg;T) = 8.5 Sq. In.70&deg; T-Scan achieved = 5.6 Sq. In.450 T-Scan achieved = 33.5 Sq. In.60&deg; T-Scan achieved = 8.5 Sq. In.707 457
~i .~/( _____ ____
LaSalle Unit-2 Feedwater 70' Exam Volume = 11.4 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume = 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 60&deg;T) 8.5 Sq. In.70&deg; P-Scan achieved = 4.9 Sq. In.45' P-Scan achieved = 31.2 Sq. In.IRS P-Scan achieved = 8.5 Sq. In.70&deg;P 45&deg;P / IRS I I 7-I LaSalle 2 GG- ,L6-JG1.xls GOD-SL6E LaSalle 2 NOZZLE EXAMINATION PLAN -1121/2003 Feedwater GERIS-2000 NOZZLE-TO-VESSEL SCANNING LIMITS NOZOD 26.25 VSLIR 126.69 WALL 6.44 WELD RAD 17.25 ODBR 3.56 TYPE F (F-FLANGE OR B-BARREL)
Delay INDEX INDEX STEP RADIAL DISTANCE AGATE BE GATE C GATE FIXTURE CPU CH ANGLE TYPE usec X Y DEG INCHES INCHES START STOP STOP START STOP STOP ANGLE ANGLE 1 0.00 W 3.66 0.00 0.00 0.8* 0.317 0.150 0 18.97 88 54 -2 45.0' T 13.26 3.00 0.00 0.80 0.411 0.150 0 13.12 235 ---7.3 -7.3 3 60.0' T 14.15 -3.00 0.00 0.80 0.490 0.150 0 18.97 185 ---353.90 6.10 416 45.0* P1 13.26 3.00 0.00 0.80 0.336 0.150 0 10.00 235 ---298.00 62.00 (ccw)5/7 45.0' P1 13.26 -3.00 0.00 0.80 0.336 0.150 0 10.00 235 ---62,00 -62.0&deg; (cw)4/6 45.00 P2 13.26 3.00 0.00 0.80 0.336 0.150 0l 10.00 235 ---321.30 38.70 (ccw)5/7 45.00 P2 13.26 -3.00 0.00 0.80 0.336 0.150 0. 10.00 235 -38.70 -38.7* (cw)1 70.00 T 12.00 0.00 0.00 0.8' 0,380 0.150 0 10.87. 52 -0.0) 0'0.2 70,00 P 12.00 3.00 0.00 0.80 0.313 0.150 0 .6.25 52 -287.20 72.86 (ccw)3 70.0' P 12.00 -3.00 0.00 0.80 0.313 0.150 0 6.25 52 72.8' -72.80 (cw)1 49.00 Z1R 17.48 2.50 0.00 .1.70 0.500 0.070 60 90 395 -335.50 24.50 (ccw)2 49.00 ZIR 17.48 -2.50 0.00 1,7&deg; 0.500 0.070 60 90 395 24.50 -24.5&deg; (cw)1 68.00 Z2A 17.28 2.50 .0.00 1.70 0.500 0.070 50 90 281 348.40 11.60 (ccw)2 68,00 Z2A 17.28 -2.50 0.00 1.70 0.500 0.070 50 90 281 -11.60 -11.6* (cw)2 30V Z2B 17.28 2.50 0.00 1.50 0.354 0.070 --237 -300.00 60.00 (cw)1 30.00 Z2B 17.28 -2.50 0.00 1.50 0.354 0.070 237 -60.00 -60.0&deg; (ccw)2 20.00 Z3 17.28 2.50 0.00 1.50 0.354 0.070 188 270.00 90.00 (cw)1 20,00 Z3 17.28 -2.50 0.00 1 .5 0.354 0.070 188 90.00 -90.00 (ccw)1/28/2003 (GE NUCLEAR ENERGY UT EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET Summary No: 2R9-016 WO No: 430431 PROJECT LaSalle Unit 2 WELD ID: LCS-2-N4E SYSTEM: RPV N4E N-SH INITIAL CALIBRATION ID: NOZ.IN, FINAL CALIBRATION ID: NOZ.OUT GERIS DATA: n4e.pl.2, n4e.p2.1, n4e.ti.1, n4e.70.1, n4e.70.2-ANUAL DATA:! N/A OPERATORS:
M. Hilborn Lv II; L. Benicki Lv II; CE Frakes Lv II; J.Guillote Lv II Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code Section XI, 1989 Edition no Addenda, also Section XI, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PDI program description and the Federal Register, Part II, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 50 for Category B-D Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) Assembly Welds Automated transverse and parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure GE-UT-705 V2, using 450 Shear wave, 600 RL, and 70* RL search units, 0&deg; L-Wave supplemental scans were also performed.
Automated scanning was performed from the nozzle OD surface, 3600 around the nozzle, with no restrictions.
For initial calibrations refer to report G2K-CAL-1.
For final calibrations refer to report G2K-CAL-3, The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system 0&deg; reference is located at 900 CW of nozzle TDC.The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded three (3) indications.
(..450 S / T-scan, 600 RL I T-scan, 450 S / P1-scan, 450 S/ P2-scan, 700 RL / T-scan, 70&deg; RL / P-ccw 700 RL / P-cw No recordable indications.
No recordable indications.
One (1) acceptable indication.
No recordable indications.
Two (2) acceptable indications.
No recordable indications.
No recordable indications.
The indications recorded above have no determinable through wall dimension and are acceptable to the requirements of IWB-3000.Automated Composite Coverage = 78.1%.EPARED BY DATE REVIEWED BY DATE UTILITY R7IEW / DATE ANII REVIEW DATE Leve= : r nt- L-7-o3 UTLevel:-
\k \-rn. () _ _LaSalle Unit-2, 2RO9 Pana I nf ILL summary No.: 2R9-016 LaSalle Unit-2 Weld LCS-2-N4E Spring 2003 Summary No.: 2R9-016 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Percent Weld Length = 360. Required Exam Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent Exam Volume = 59. Area Sq. In. Auto Auto Auto Auto 700 T-Scan A 11.4 5.6 9.5% 360 4.7%450 T-Scan A 39.2 33.5 56.8% 360 28.4%60 T-Scan A 8.5 8.5 14.4% 360 7.2%700 P-Scan A 11.4 4.9 8.3% 360 4.2%450 P-Scan A 39.2 31.2 52.9% 360 26.4%IRS P-Scan A 8.5 8.5 14.4% 360 7.2%700 T-Scan 450 T-Scan 600 T-Scan 700 P-Scan 450 P-Scan _IRS P-Scan 700 T-Scan 450 T-Scan 600 T-Scan 70' P-Scan 450 P-Scan IRS P-Scan T I otal Composite Coverage =78.1,/o Comments:
A -Examined 3600. Scanning limited due to nozzle configuration.,Note -Rounding methods may make calculated values appear in error.LaSalle Unit-2, 2RO9 Page of
"-iF LaSalle Unit-2 Feedwater 700 Exam Volume = 11.4 Sq. In.45&deg; Exam Volume = 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 60&deg;T) = 8.5 Sq. In.70' T-Scan achieved = 5.6 Sq. In.450 T-Scan achieved = 33.5 Sq. In.600 T-Scan achieved = 8.5 Sq. In./70"1" 45'T 60'r
/I 7'LaSalle Unit-2 Feedwater 70&deg; Exam Volume = 11.4 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume = 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 60'T) = 8.5 Sq. In.70&deg; P-Scan achieved = 4.9 Sq. In.45&deg; P-Scan achieved = 31.2 Sq. In.IRS P-Scan achieved = 8.5 Sq. In.70'P 45P I IRS I II z Ot I I LaSalle 2 G(.- SL6-JG1.xIs GOD-SL6E LaSalle 2 NOZZLE EXAMINATION PLAN 1/21/2003 Feedwater GERIS-2000 NOZZLE-TO-VESSEL SCANNING LIMITS NOZOD 26.25 VSLIR 126.69 WALL 6.44 WELD RAD 17.25 ODBR 3.56 TYPE F (F-FLANGE OR B-BARREL)Delay INDEX INDEX STEP RADIAL DISTANCE AGATE BE GATE C GATE FIXTURE CPU CH ANGLE TYPE usec X Y DEG INCHES INCHES START STOP STOP START STOP STOP ANGLE ANGLE 1 0.00 W 3.66 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.317 0.150 0 18.97 88 2 45.00 T 13.26 3.00 0.00 0.80 0.411 0.150 0 13.12 235 --7.33 -773*3 60.00 T 14.15 -3.00 0.00 0.60 0.490 0.150 0 18.97 185
-35390 6.10 4/6 45.00 P1 13.26 3.00 0.00 0.80 0.336 0.150 0 10.00 235 -298.00 62.00 (ccw)5/7 45.00 P1 13.26 -3.00 0.00 0.80 0.336 0.150 0 10.00 235 -62.00 -62.0* (cw)416 45.00 P2 13.26 3.00 0.00 0.85 0.336 .0.150 0 10.00 235 -321.30 38.70 (ccw)5/7 45.00 P2 13.26 -3.00 0.00 0.80. 0.336 0.150 0, 10.00 235 -38.7' -38.7&deg; (cw)1 70.00 T 12.00 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.380 0.150 0 10.87 52 -0.00 0.00 2 70.0' P 12.00 3.00 0.00 0.80 0.313 0.150 .0 6.25 52 -287.20 72.80 (ccw)3 70.00 P 12.00 -3.00 0.00 0.80 0.313 0.150 0 6.25 52 -72.80 -72.8&deg; (cw)1 49.0' Z1R 17.48 2.50 0.00 1.70 0.500 0.070 60 90 395 -335.50 24.50 (ccw)2 49.00 ZIR 17.48 -2.50 0.00 1.7' 0.500 0.070 60 90 395 -24.50 -24.5' (cw)1 68.0' Z2A 17.28 2.50 0.00 1.70 0.500 0.070 50 90 281 -348.40 11.60 (ccw)2 68.0' Z2A 17.28 -2.50 0.00 1.7 0.500 0.070 50 90 261 -11.60 -11.6* (cw)2 30.0' Z2B 17.28 2.50 0.00 1.50 0.354 0.070 --237 -300.0' 60.00 (cw)1 30.00 Z2B 17.28 -2.50 0.00 1.50 0.354 0.070 237 -60.00 -60.00 (ccw)2 20.00 Z3 17.28 2.50 0.00 1.5&deg; 0.354 0.070 188 -270.00 90.00 (cw)1 20.00 Z3 17.28 -2.50 0.00 1.50 0.354 0.070 -188 -90.00 -90.0&deg; (ccw)1/28/2003
* NUCLEAR ENERGY UT EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET Summary No: 2R9-017 WO No: 430431 PROJECT LaSalle Unit 2 WELD ID: LCS-2-N4F SYSTEM: RPV N4F N-SH INITIAL CALIBRATION ID: NOZ.IN, NOZ.70.IN FINAL CALIBRATION ID: NOZ.OUT, NOZ.70.OUT GERIS DATA: n4f p2.1, n4f.tl.1, n4f.tI.2, n4f.pl.1, n4f.70.1, n4f.70.2 IVIANUAL DATA. N/A OPERATORS:
M. Hilborn Lv II; L. Benicki Lv II; CE Frakes Lv II; J.Guillote Lv IIUltrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code Section XI, 1989 Edition no Addenda, also Section XI, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PDI program description and the Federal Register, Part II, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 50 for Category B-0 Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) Assembly Welds Automated transverse and parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure GE-UT-705 V2, using 450 Shear wave, 600 RL, and 70&deg; RL search units, 0&deg; L-Wave supplemental scans were also performed.
Automated scanning was performed from the nozzle OD surface, 360* around the nozzle, with no restrictions.
For initial calibrations refer to report G2K-CAL-1.
For final calibrations refer to report G2K-CAL-3.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system 0&deg; reference is located at 90* CW of nozzle TDC.The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded no indications.
450 S / T-scan, No recordable indications.
60* RL / T-scan, No recordable indications.
456 S / PT-scan, No recordable indications.
450 S / P12-scan, No recordable indications, 70* RL / T-scan, No recordable indications.
70* RL / P-ccw No recordable indications.
700 RL / P-cw No recordable indications.
Automated Composite Coverage =
78.1%.,,REPARED BY DATE REVIEWED BY DATE UtETVY W DkTE EiRVEVIEW DATE UTLevel:.L nt-30,-.3 UT Level: -fa -3 LaSalle Unit-2, 2RO9 Paqe I of q Summary No.: 2R9-017 LaSalle Unit-2 Weld LCS-2-N4F Spring 2003 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE-Percent Weld Length = 360. Required Exam Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent Exam Volume = 59. Area Sq. In. Auto Auto Auto Auto 70 0 T-Scan A 11.4 5.6 9.5% 360 4.7%450 T-Scan A 39.1 33.5 56.8% 360 28.4%600 T-Scan A 8.5 8.5 14.4% 360 7.2%700 P-Scan A 11.4 4.9 8.3% 360 4.2%450 P-Scan A 39.1 31.2 52.9% 360 26.4%IRS P-Scan A 8.5 8.5 14.4% 360 7.2%70' T-Scan _450 T-Scan 60* T-Scan 70* P-Scan 450 P-Scan IRS P-Scan 70' T-Scan 450 T-Scan 600 T-Scan 70' P-Scan 450 P-Scan IRS P-Scan% Total Composite Coverage =78.1%Comments:
A -Examined 3600. Scanning limited due to nozzle configuration.
Note -Rounding methods may make calculated values appear in error.LaSalle Unit-2, 2RO9 Page 3 of
/I _ _LaSalle Unit-2 Feedwater 70&deg; Exam Volume = 11.4 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume = 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 60&deg;T) = 8.5 Sq. In.70&deg; P-Scan achieved = 4.9 Sq. In.450 P-Scan achieved = 31.2 Sq. In.IRS P-Scan achieved = 8.5 Sq. In.70'P 45*P / IRS q_I 7-I LaSalle Unit-2 Feedwater 70&deg; Exam Volume = 11.4 Sq. In.45' Exam Volume = 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 60'T) = 8.5 Sq. In.70' T-Scan achieved = 5.6 Sq. In.450 T-Scan achieved
= 33.5 Sq. In.60&deg; T-Scan achieved
= 8.5 Sq. In.70'T 45'T 60'T I I I!I LaSalle 2 GO. L.6-JGI .xls GOD-SL6E LaSalle 2 NOZZLE EXAMINATION PLAN -* 1/21/2003 Feedwater GERIS-2000 NOZZLE.TO-VESSEL SCANNING LIMITS NOZOD 26.25 VSLIR 126.69 WALL 6.44 WELD RAD 17.25 ODBR 3.56 TYPE F (F-FLANGE OR B-BARREL)Delay INDEX INDEX STEP RADIAL DISTANCE AGATE BE GATE C GATE FIXTURE CPU CH ANGLE TYPE usec X Y DEG INCHES INCHES START STOP STOP START STOP STOP ANGLE ANGLE 1 0.00 W 3.66 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.317 0.150 0 18.97 88 2 45.0' T 13.26 3.00 0.00 0.80 0.411 0.150 0 13.12 235 --7.33 -7.3 3 60.00 T 14.15 -3.00 0.00 0.80 0.490 0.150 0 18.97 185 ---353.9 6.10 4/6 45.00 P1 13.26 3.00 0.00 0.80 0.336 0.150 0 10.00 235 129.0&deg; 62.00 (ocw)5/7 45.00 P1 13.26 -3.00 0.00 0.80 0.336 0.150 0 10.00 235 ---62.00 -62.00 (cw)4/6 45.0* P2 13.26 3.00 0.00 0.80 0.336 0.150 0 10.00 235 ---321.30 38.70 (ccw)5/7 45.0' P2 13.26 -3.00 0.00 0.80 0.336 0.150 0 10.00 235 ---38.70 -38.7a (cw)1 70.00 T 12.00 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.380 0.150 0 10.87 52 ---0.00 0.00 2 70.0' P 12.00 3.00 0.00 0.80 0.313 0.150 0 6.25 52 ---287.20 72.80 (ccw)3 70.00 P 12.00 -3.00 0.00 0.80 0.313 0.150 0 6.25 52 ---72.80 -72.8* (cw)1 49.0' Z1R 17.48 2.50 0.00 1.70 0.500 0.070 60 90 395 --335.50 24.50 (ccw)2 49.0* Z1R 17.48 -2.50 0.00 1.70 0.500 0.070 60 90 395 --24.50 -24.5' (cw)1 68.00 Z2A 17.28 2.50 0.00 1.7' 0.500 0.070 50 90 281 ---348.40 11.60 (ccw)2 68.00 Z2A 17.28 -2.50 0.00 1.7* 0.500 0.070 50 90 281 ---11.60 -11.60 (cw)2 30.00 Z2B 17.28 2.50 0.00 1.5' 0.354 0.070 --237 ---300.00 60.00 (cw)1 30.00 Z2B 17.28 -2.50 0.00 1.5&deg; 0.354 0.070 -237 ---60.00 -60.00 (ccw)2 20.00 Z3 17.28 2.50 0.00 1.5&deg; *0.354 0.070 -188 -270.00 90.00 (cw)1 20.00 Z3 17.28 -2.50 0.00 1.5 1 0.354 0.070 188 90.00 -90.0* (ccw)_-) 1/30/2003
__ Report No.: EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET 2R9-e6o N GE NUCLEAR ENERGY 2R-6 Site and Unit: LaSalle Unit 2 Component ID: IRH-HX2B-08D Outage: L2R09 System, RHR ASME Cat.: C-C ASME Item C3.10 Aug Requirements:
N/A Exams Performed Data Sheet Cal Sheet Procedure Calibration Block F Examination -Cet Level. Date Personnel MT MT-004 N/A MT-EXLN-102V0 N/A Michael Kemp II 1/22/2003 Examination Results: During the magnetic particle examination of the above referenced weld, 1 indication was recorded.
Indication was acceptable in accordance with ASME Section XI, Table IWC-3510-3.
74.4% of the code required surface area was examined.This examination meets the requirements of ASME Section XI, 1989 Edition, no Addenda.Examination results were compared to data report D-307 from 1990 outage with -No Change These examinations were performed under Work Order: 430436 [Ji Change This Summary and the following data sheets have been reviewed and accepted y the following personnel:
Prepared By: Level: Date: Utility Reviewe B Title: ate: N/A N/A..N.....
N/A Reviewed By: Level: Date. AN1i Reviewed By: Title: Date: Page 1 of GE Nuclear Energy MAGNETIC PARTICLE EXAMINATION REPORT Site: LaSalle Unit: 2 Project: L2R09 Report Number: 2R9-060 Sheet No.: MT-004 Weld No.: IRH-HX2B-08D Configuration:
I Lug Drawing: GEL-1111 System: RHR Procedure No.: MT-EXLN-102VO Version / Revision Rev. 0 DRR: N/A Material:
Surface Condition:
Item: Carbon Steel Smooth Weld -Final Magnetizing Apparatus Black Light Mfg: Parker Research Yoke Calibration: AC
-10 lb. Lift Model Serial Number Model: B-300 Blacklight N/A N/A Serial No. 8140 Yoke Spacing: 6' Light Meter N/A N/A Thermometer:
222229 Surface Temperature:
65&deg; F Technique Examination Medium Blacklight Intensity Magnetization:
AC Magnetic Particles:
Dry N/A Technique:
Continuous Parker Research RP-6 11793 Blacklight Intensity Manufacturer:
Particle Type: Batch Noindication Number:
 
==
Description:==
 
p Results: 1 I 1/8" Linear on IRH-HX2BOD RI Comments: See attached sketch #2 for indication details.See attached sketch #1 for exam limitation.
Michael Kemp 1.17j II 1/2212003 Utility Review Date Initial Examiner Level Date GE Review Level Date ANII Review Date Page _ of 6
(-T t-hc -v 9 C T 'k q -t4 x Z6~ -P tq-v ~ i/ ". 7 / 6,t 3 --o(T jC H -/JX ZC-Oyi< 7"t S rv',c Tv,('f I fpp,, I II t)mJ stote/13 O)CA A)o0T74A-
/Z3 3l.3, CoVCRd-6 V1.3 /, z3 7') +- CZA2.S )=- 7-1 / jrr '/3/o Pq 3 " tz, (,
(Report No: 2R9-060 Location of the IRH-HX2B-08D MT Indication (Indication is on the edge of the plate in the center of the marked area.Page 4/1of 6 Wt (of *!Ze 14 -Hy z 6 --0 f I>5R 5L-eT A'a /". z A I- a 4 C 4 4 Af~~~~~ OfICi o 9 Fron~- --Tke VF -i-CATh -k.to-edi of- f~f;~-~- 0 r6 (Report No: 2R9-060 IRH-HX2B-08D, 09D, and 010D ( General view of the support showing the 8, 9, and 10 welds.Location of the limitation on the 8 weld Page ( of GE Energy Nuclear UT Examination Summary Report No. 2R10-007 Project: LaSalle Unit-2, L2R10 Component ID: LCS-2-AE System: RPV Calibration ID:
03 O&S. IfI? c'-, GERIS Data: UP and DN scan files Manual Data: RPV-010, RPV-011 Examiners:
C. Gauthier Lv. II, S. Gauthier Lv. II Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code, Section Xl, 1989 Edition No Addenda, also Section Xl, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PDI program description and the Federal Register, Part II, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 50 for Category B-A Reactor Vessel (RPV) Assembly Welds.Automated transverse and parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure GE-UT-704 V5 using 450 Shear wave, 60 RL&deg; and 700 RL search units, supplemental 0* L-wave scans were also performed.
Manual transverse and parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure GE-UT-300 V8 using 60 RL&deg;search units.Automated and manual scanning was performed from the vessel OD surface.For calibration records refer to report G2K-CAL-1.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system "0" references are located at Vessel 00 Azimuth and Vessel 0 Elevation.
The GERIS 2000 OD system and manual examinations recorded no indications.
Previous examination results were reviewed and no changes were noted.Automated and Manual Composite Coverage = 58% Calculated as % of 1800 length.29% Calculated as % of 3600 length.repared y: Reviewed 19y: U-ility Revieweo:y:
ANII Reviewed By: Date:3/Z/'O5 Date: 3..5 Date Date: LaSalle Unit-2, L2R1O Page 1 of 17-C,)C 2.0 Summary No.: 2R10-007 Weld LCS-2-AE LaSalle Unit-2, L2R10 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA LENGTH CALCULATIONS Percent Weld Length = 418.6 Required Exam Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent Exam Volume = 75.6 Area Sq. In. Auto Auto Auto Auto 700 T-Scan A 14.8 6.2 8.2% 370.5 3.6%450 T-Scan A 48.9 42.4 56.1% 370.5 24.8%600 T-Scan A 11.9 6.0 7.9% 370.5 3.5%700 P-Scan A 14.8 4.9 6.5% 370.5 2.9%450 P-Scan A 48.9 25.2 33.3% 370.5 14.8%600 P-Scan A 11.9 5.3 7.0% 370.5 3.1%70_ T-Scan 450 T-Scan 600 T-Scan 70' P-Scan 450 P-Scan 60* P-Scan Manual 0.0%600 S4 T-Scan B 11.9 5.0 6.6% 48 0.4%60* S6 T-Scan B 63.7 52.3 69.2% 48 4.0%60 0 S4 P-Scan B 11.9 5.3 7.0% 48 0.4%600 S6 P-Scan B 63.7 5.3 7.0% 48 0.4%% Total Composite Coverage =58%Comments:
A -Automated coverage.B -Manual scanning in an area limited to the automated device due to thermocouple pads at 00 Az.Coverage calculated as percent of scheduled examination from 00 to 1800.Note -Rounding methods may affect calculated values.
C', C Summary No.: 2R10-007 Weld LCS-2-AE LaSalle Unit-2, L2R10 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA LENGTH CALCULATIONS Percent Weld Length= 837.2 Required Exam Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent Exam Volume = 75.6 Area Sq. In. Auto Auto Auto Auto 70" T-Scan A 14.8 6.2 8.2% 370.5 1.8%450 T-Scan A 48.9 42.4 56.1% 370.5 12.4%60' T-Scan A 11.9 6.0 7.9% 370.5 1.7%70* P-Scan A 14.8 4.9 6.5% 370.5 1.4%45' P-Scan A 48.9 25.2 33.3% 370.5 7.4%600 P-Scan A 11. 9 5.3 7.0% 370.5 1.6%70_ T-Scan 450 T-Scan 60' T-Scan 700 P-Scan 450 P-Scan 600 P-Scan Manual 0.0%60' S4 T-Scan B 11.9 5.0 6.6% 48 0.2%60' S6 T-Scan B 63.7 52.3 69.2% 48 2.0%60&deg; S4 P-Scan B 11.9 5.3 7.0% 48 0.2%600 S6 P-Scan B 63.7 5.3 7.0% 48 0.2%% Total Composite Coverage =29%0~I1 Comments:
A -Automated coverage.B -Manual scanning in an area limited to the automated device due to thermocouple pads at 00 Az.Coverage calculated as percent of full weld.Note -Rounding methods may affect calculated values.
i_ LaSalle Unit-2 CShell to Flange Weld 2.PO 0, 70' Exam Volume = 14.8 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume = 48.9 Sq. In.60" Exam Volume = 11.9 Sq. In.70&deg; T-Scan achieved
= 3.5 Sq. In.I5S I1450 T-Scan achieved
= 2.9 Sq. In.600 T-Scan achieved = 0.0 Sq. In.70&deg; P-Scan achieved = 4.9 Sq. In.450 P-Scan achieved = 25.2 Sq. In.600 P-Scan achieved = 5.3 Sq. In.P/T-Scans I ____ ___0 ." Looking DN Scans- .0 0:=L fz- -i~-_- -----
CD, C 0,-h LaSalle Unit-2 Shell to Flange Weld 700 Exam Volume = 14.8 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume = 48.9 Sq. In.600 Exam Volume = 11.9 Sq. In.700 T-Scan achieved = 6.2 Sq. In.450 T-Scan achieved = 42.4 Sq. In.600 T-Scan achieved = 11.9 Sq. In.700 P-Scan achieved = 4.9 Sq. In.450 P-Scan achieved = 25.2 Sq. In.600 P-Scan achieved = 5.3 Sq. In.P-Scans I 70&deg;T I 45&deg;T I 60'T I-1 Scanner Motion Looking UP Scans 0.0"-20.75"-------Z ---i
_LaSalle Unit-2 Shell to Flange Weld C)0 C-n 600 S4 Exam Volume = 11.9 Sq. In.60&deg; S6 Exam Volume = 63.7 Sq. In.600 S4 T-Scan achieved = 11.9 Sq. In. LKUP 600 S6 T-Scan achieved = 52.3 Sq. In. LKUP 600 S4 T-Scan achieved
= 0.0 Sq. In. LKDN 60' S6 T-Scan achieved = 6.9 Sq. In. LKDN 600 S4 P-Scan achieved = 5.3 Sq. In. CW/CCW 600 S6 P-Scan achieved = 30.0 Sq. In. CW/CCW///60 P 60'P-Scans 60&deg;T-D 0 Report No.: EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET 2RIO-004 GE NUCLEAR ENERGY Site: LaSalle Unit-2 Component ID: GEL-1061-DA Outage: L2RIO0 Bot. Hd. Meridional System RPV ASME Cat.: B-A ASME Item: B1.22 Aug Requirements:
NIA Exams Performed:
Data Sheet Cal Sheet Procedure Calibration Block, Examination Cert Leveli Date Personnel 600 Long. RPV-003 N/A GE-UT-300 IIW2-047 Scott Erickson II 2/22/2005 600 Long. RPV-004 N/A GE-UT-300 01-92-06 Scott Erickson II 2/23/2005 Examination Results: Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code, Section XI, 1989 Edition No Addenda, also Section XI, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PDI program description and the Federal Register, Part II, NuclearRegulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 50 for Category B-A Reactor Vessel (RPV) Assembly Welds.Manual transverse and parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure GE-UT-300 V8, using 60' RL-wave search units.Scanning was performed from the vessel OD surface. Scanning was limited due to the vessel skirt attachment weld and an inaccessible inner skirt region..No indications were recorded.Manual coverage = 66%.Examination results were compared to data report 4023,18011,3247 from PSI outage with No Change These examinations were performed under Work Order: 5849600 Change This Summary and the following data sheets have been redv ed and accepted by the following personnel:
Prepared By: Level: Date: Utility Review- Date: ANII Review: Date: Page 1 of I-'U C', iF r'3 I-M 0'U (0 CD 0 Inspection Report No.: 2R10-004 Bottom Head Meridionals GEL-1061-DA LaSalle Unit-2, L2R10 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Percent Weld Length = 80.4 Required Exam Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent Exam Volume = 60.2 Area Sq. In. Auto Auto Auto Auto 60* S4 P-Scan LKDN A 8.8 8.8 7.3% 53 2.4%600 S4 P-Scan LKUP A 8.8 8.8 7.3% 53 2.4%600 S6 P-Scan A 51.4 51.4 85.4% 53 28.1%600 S4 T-Scan LKCW A 8.8 8.8 7.3%6 53 2.4%600 S4 T-Scan LKCCW A 8.8 8.8 7.3% 53 2.4%60' S6 T-Scan A 51.4 51.4 85.4% 53 28.1%600 S4 P-Scan LKDN 600 S4 P-Scan LKUP 600 S6 P-Scan 600 S4 T-Scan LKCW 600 S4 T-Scan LKCCW_600 S6 T-Scan 60' S4 P-Scan LKDN "_600 S4 P-Scan LKUP 60' S6 P-Scan 600 S4 T-Scan LKCW 600 S4 T-Scan LKCCW 600 S6 T-Scan% Total Composite Coverage =66%Comments:
A -Examined 53" of length. Scanning limited due to support skirt weld and inaccessible inner skirt region.Note -Rounding methods may make calculated values appear in error.
LaSalle Unit-2 Bottom Head Meridional 600 S4 Exam Volume = 8.8 Sq. In.60' S6 Exam Volume = 51.4 Sq. In.600 S4 P-Scan LKDN achieved = 8.8 Sq. In.600 S4 P-Scan LKUP achieved = 8.8 Sq. In.60&deg; S6 P-Scan achieved = 51.4 Sq. In.600 S4 T-Scan LKCW achieved = 8.8 Sq. In.60&deg; S4 T-Scan LKCCW achieved = 8.8 Sq. In.60' S6 T-Scan achieved
= 51.4 Sq. In.
(Lmax -80.4" Lmin -27.4" Weld Length -80.4" Exam limited due to skirt weld.
LA SALLE L_Rto pArc I'- I (t Site: LaSalle Unit-2 Component ID: GEL-1061-DE Outage: L2RIO Bot. Hd. Meridional System RPV ASME Cat.:
B-A ASME Item: BI.22 Aug Requirements:
NIA Exams Performed Data Sheet Cal Sheet Procedure Calibration Block Examination Cert Level0 Date Personnel 60&deg; Long. RPV-001 N/A GE-UT-300 i IIW2-047 Wallace Reid II 2/23/2005 60* Long. RPV-002 N/A GE-UT-300 01-92-06 Wallace Reid II 2/23/2005 Examination Results: (,, Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code, Section XI, 1989 Edition No Addenda, also Section XI, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PDI program description and the Federal Register, Part II, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 50 for Category B-A Reactor Vessel (RPV) Assembly Welds.Manual transverse and parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure GE-UT-300 V8, using 600 RL-wave search units.Scanning was performed from the vessel OD surface. Scanning was limited due to the vessel skirt attachment weld and an inaccessible inner skirt region.No indications were recorded.Manual coverage = 66%.Examination results were compared to data report 4023,18012,3247 from PSI outage with ,. No Change These examinations were performed under Work Order: 5849600 Change This Summary and the following data sheets have been reviewed and accepted by the following personnel: "repared By: Level: Date Utility R: Date: ANII Review: Date: Page 1 of Inspection Report No.: 2R10-005 Bottom Head Meridionals GEL-1061-DE LaSalle Unit-2, L2R10 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Percent Weld Length = 80.4 Required Exam Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent Exam Volume = 60.2 Area Sq. In. Auto Auto Auto Auto 600 S4 P-Scan LKDN A 8.8 8.8 7.3% 53 2.4%600 S4 P-Scan LKUP A 8.8 8.8 7.3% 53 2.4%600 S6 P-Scan A 51.4 51.4 85.4% 53 28.1%600 S4 T-Scan LKCW A 8.8 8.8 7.3% 53 2.4%600 S4 T-Scan LKCCW A 8.8 8.8 7.3% 53 2.4%600 S6 T-Scan A 51.4 51.4 85.4% 53 28.1%600 S4 P-Scan LKDN 600 S4 P-Scan LKUP 600 S6 P-Scan 600 S4 T-Scan LKCW 600 S4 T-Scan LKCCW_60&deg; S6 T-Scan 600 S4 P-Scan LKDN 600 S4 P-Scan LKUP 600 S6 P-Scan 600 S4 T-Scan LKCW 600 S4 T-Scan LKCCW 600 S6 T-Scan% Total Composite Coverage =66%Comments:
A -Examined 53' of length.
Scanning limited due to support skirt weld and inaccessible inner skirt region.Note -Rounding methods may make calculated values appear in error.
LaSalle Unit-2 Bottom Head Meridional 600 S4 Exam Volume = 8.8 Sq. In.60&deg; S6 Exam Volume = 51.4 Sq. In.60&deg; S4 P-Scan LKDN achieved = 8.8 Sq. In.600 S4 P-Scan LKUP achieved = 8.8 Sq. In.60&deg; S6 P-Scan achieved = 51.4 Sq. In.600 S4 T-Scan LKCW achieved = 8.8 Sq. In.600 S4 T-Scan LKCCW achieved = 8.8 Sq. In.600 S6 T-Scan achieved
= 51.4 Sq. In.
(Lmax -80.4" Lmin -27.4" Weld Length -80.4" Exam limited due to skirt weld./LA SALLE -R 1(0 n A I~P-- I/
(Report No.: EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET 2R10-006 GE NUCLEAR ENERGY Site: LaSalle Unit-2 Component ID: GEL-1061-DF Outage: L2R10 Bot. Hd. Meridional System RPV ASME Cat.: B-A ASME Item: B1.22 Aug Requirements:
NIA Exams Performed:
Data Sheet Cal Sheet Procedure Calibration Block Examination Cert Leve- Date Personnel 60* Long. RPV-005 N/A GE-UT-300 IIW2-047 Scott Erickson II 2123/2005 600 Long. RPV-006 N/A GE-UT-300 01-92-06 Scott Erickson II 2/23/2005 Examination Results: Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code, Section XI, 1989 Edition No Addenda, also Section XI, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PDI program description and the Federal Register, Part II, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 50 for Category B-A Reactor Vessel (RPV) Assembly Welds.Manual transverse and parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure GE-UT-300 V8, using 60' RL-wave search units.Scanning was performed from the vessel OD surface. Scanning was limited due to the vessel skirt attacltment weld and an inaccessible inner skirt region.No indications were recorded.Manual coverage = 66%.(.Examination results were compared to data report 4032,18011,3247 from PSI outage with vi No Change These examinations were performed under Work Order: 5849600 _. Change This Summary and the following data sheets have been reviwd and accepted by the following personnel:
Prepared By Level: Date: U eie Date: ANII Review: Date: Page 1 of U--C 0 Inspection Report No.: 2R10-006 Bottom Head Meridionals GEL-1061-DF LaSalle Unit-2, L2R10 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Percent Weld Length = 80.4 Required Exam Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent Exam Volume = 60.2 Area Sq. In. Auto Auto Auto Auto 600 S4 P-Scan LKDN A 8.8 8.8 7.3% 53 2.4%600 S4 P-Scan LKUP A 8.8 8.8 7.3% 53 2.4%600 S6 P-Scan A 51.4 51.4 85.4% 53 28.1%600 S4 T-Scan LKCW A 8.8 8.8 7.3% 53 2.4%600 S4 T-Scan LKCCW A 8.8 8.8 7.3% 53 2.4%600 S6 T-Scan A 51.4 51.4 85.4% 53 28.1%600 04 P-Scan LKDN 600 S4 P-Scan LKUP 600 S6 P-Scan 600 S4 T-Scan LKCW 600 S4 T-Scan LKCCW_600 S6 T-Scan 600 S4 P-Scan LKDN 600 S4 P-Scan LKUP 600 S6 P-Scan 600 S4 T-Scan LKCW 600 S4 T-Scan LKCCW_600 S6 T-Scan% Total Composite Coverage =66%Comments: A -Examined 53" of length. Scanning limited due to support skirt weld and inaccessible inner skirt region.Note -Rounding methods may make calculated values appear in error.
LaSalle Unit-2 Bottom Head Meridional 60&deg; S4 Exam Volume = 8.8 Sq. In.600 S6 Exam Volume = 51.4 Sq. In.60' S4 P-Scan LKDN achieved = 8.8 Sq. In.60' S4 P-Scan LKUP achieved = 8.8 Sq. In.600 S6 P-Scan achieved = 51.4 Sq. In.60&deg; S4 T-Scan LKCW achieved = 8.8 Sq. In.600 S4 T-Scan LKCCW achieved = 8.8 Sq. In.60&deg; S6 T-Scan achieved = 51.4 Sq. In.
x r-CD CDO co CD C 0 U) =CD.I-5.I-3 0)x 0O
_ GE Energy Nuclear UT Examination Summary Report No. 2R10-010 Project: LaSalle Unit-2, L2R1O Component ID: LCS-2-N2B System: Recirculation Inlet Calibration ID: 01NOZIN GERIS Data: TL, P1 and 70TP scan files Manual Data: N/A Examiners:
C. Gauthier Lv. II, S. Gauthier Lv. II Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code, Section Xl, 1989 Edition No Addenda, also Section Xl, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PDI program description and the Federal Register, Part II, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 50 for Category B-A Reactor Vessel (RPV) Assembly Welds.Automated transverse and parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure GE-UT-705 V4 using 450 Shear wave, 60 RL&deg; and 70&deg; RL search units, supplemental 00 L-wave scans were also performed.
Scanning of the inner 15%T volume for radial flaws was performed using 450 and 600 Shear wave search units as specified by the "Nozzle Inner Radius and Bore Requirements" sheet, which has been verified by modeling.Automated scanning was performed from the vessel OD surface.For calibration records refer to report G2K-CAL-1.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system "0" references are located at Vessel 00 Azimuth and Vessel 0 Elevation.
The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded no indications.
Previous examination results were reviewed and no changes were noted.Automated Composite Coverage = 70%.lreparea By: Reviewed 6y: -Utility Reviewed By: ANII Reviewed By: DDate:Date: Date -Date: LaSalle Unit-2, L2R1O Page 1 of Cl)C rI-O)01 Inspection Report No.: 2R10-010 Recirculation Inlet LCS-2-N2B LaSalle Unit-2, L2R10 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Percent Weld Length = 360. Required Exam Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent Exam Volume = 59.1 Area Sq. In. Auto Auto Auto Auto 700 T-Scan A 11.4 5.8 9.8% 360 4.9%450 T-Scan A 39.2 33.5 56.7% 360 28.3%600 T-Scan A 8.5 8.5 14.4% 360 7.2%70&deg; P-Scan A 11.4 4.5 7.6% 360 3.8%450 P-Scan A 39.2 22.5 38.1% 360 19.0%Inner 15%T P-Scan A 8.5 8.5 14.4% 360 7.2%70&deg; T-Scan 450 T-Scan 600 T-Scan 700 P-Scan 450 P-Scan Inner 15%T P-Scan 70* T-Scan 450 T-Scan 600 T-Scan 700 P-Scan ,_ _450 P-Scan Inner 15%T P-Scan% Total Composite Coverage =70%0-0.H Comments:
A -Examined 3600 of length. Scanning limited due to nozzle configuration.
Inner 15%T P-Scan area by modeling.Note -Rounding methods may make calculated values appear in error.
0)CD, C 2.0n 0/LaSalle Unit-2 Recirculation Inlet 700 Exam Volume
= 11.4 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume = 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 60&deg;T) = 8.5 Sq. In.700 T-Scan achieved = 5.8 Sq. In.450 T-Scan achieved = 33.5 Sq. In.600 T-Scan achieved = 8.5 Sq. In.17.25" 70'T 45=T I 60'T I-----1>-0 0)0 0/( _______ ______
LaSalle Unit-2 Recirculation Inlet 700 Exam Volume 450 Exam Volume Inner 15%T Exam= 11.4 Sq. In.= 39.2 Sq. In.Volume (IRS & 60&deg;T) = 8.5 Sq. In.700 P-Scan achieved = 4.5 Sq. In.450 P-Scan achieved = 22.5 Sq. In.IRS P-Scan achieved = 8.5 Sq. In. (By model)17.25" 70'P 45&deg;P,------D CO CD 00 0 I GE Energy Nuclear UT Examination Summary Report No. 2R10-011 Project: LaSalle Unit-2, L2R10 Component ID: LCS-2-N2C System: Recirculation Inlet Calibration ID: 01NOZIN GERIS Data: TL, P1 and 70TP scan files Manual Data: N/A Examiners:
C. Gauthier Lv. II, S. Gauthier Lv. II Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code, Section Xl, 1989 Edition No Addenda, also Section XI, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PDI program description and the Federal Register, Part II, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 50 for Category B-D Reactor Vessel (RPV) Assembly Welds.Automated transverse and parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure GE-UT-705 V4 using 450 Shear wave, 60 RL&deg; and 700 RL search units, supplemental 0&deg; L-wave scans were also performed.
Scanning of the inner 15%T volume for radial flaws was performed using 450 and 60&deg; Shear wave search units as specified by the "Nozzle Inner Radius and Bore Requirements" sheet, which has been verified by modeling.Automated scanning was performed from the vessel OD surface.For calibration records refer to report G2K-CAL-1.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system "0" references are located at Vessel 0' Azimuth and Vessel 0 Elevation.
The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded no indications.
Previous examination results were reviewed and no changes were noted.Automated Composite Coverage = 70%.I LL LaSalle Unit-2, L2R1O Page 1 of ( I I'-C I-" N, (0Q CD Inspection Report No.: 2R10-01 1 Recirculation Inlet LCS-2-N2C LaSalle Unit-2, L2R10 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Percent Weld Length = 360. Required Exam Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent Exam Volume = 59.1 Area Sq. In. Auto Auto Auto Auto 70' T-Scan A 11.4 5.8 9.8% 308.4 4.2%450 T-Scan A 39.2 33.5 56.7% 308.4 24.3%600 T-Scan A 8.5 8.5 14.4% 308.4 6.2%700 P-Scan A 11.4 4.5 7.6% 308.4 3.3%450 P-Scan A 39.2 22.5 38.1% 308.4 16.3%Inner 15%T P-Scan A 8.5 8.5 14.4% 308.4 6.2%700 T-Scan B 11.4 5.8 9.8% 51.6 0.7%450 T-Scan B 39.2 33.5 56.7% 51.6 4.1%600 T-Scan B 8.5 4.8 8.1% 51.6 0.6%70* P-Scan B 11.4 4.5 7.6% 51.6 0.5%450 P-Scan B 39.2 22.5 38.1% 51.6 2.7%Inner 15%T P-Scan B 8.5 8.5 14.4% 51.6 1.0%70' T-Scan 450 T-Scan 600 T-Scan 700 P-Scan 45' P-Scan Inner 15%T P-Scan% Total Composite Coverage =70%Comments:
A -Examined 308.40 of length. Scanning limited due to proximity of N9 nozzle, B -Examined 51.60 of length in area of N9 nozzle.Inner 15%T P-Scan area by modeling.Note -Rounding methods may make calculated values appear in error.
CD CD'i, /LaSalle Unit-2 Recirculation Inlet 700 Exam Volume = 11.4 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume = 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 60'T) = 8.5 Sq. In.70' T-Scan achieved = 5.8 Sq. In.450 T-Scan achieved = 33.5 Sq. In.600 T-Scan achieved = 8.5 Sq. In.17.25" 70'T I 45&deg;T I 60'T I CD 0------I C)C)CD LaSalle Unit-2 Recirculation Inlet 700 Exam Volume = 11.4 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume = 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 60&deg;T) = 8.5 Sq. In.700 T-Scan achieved = 5.8 Sq. In.450 T-Scan achieved = 33.5 Sq. In.600 T-Scan achieved = 6.6 Sq. In.17.25" Limited area due to N9.I 70&deg;T I 45'T 60'T I I 0D CI)CD 01/LaSalle Unit-2 Recirculation Inlet 700 Exam Volume = 11.4 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume = 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 60'T) = 8.5 Sq. In.700 P-Scan achieved = 4.5 Sq. In.450 P-Scan achieved = 22.5 Sq. In.IRS P-Scan achieved = 8.5 Sq. In. (By model)17.25" F-70&deg;P 45"P CD 0 ft4 F-----I Unlimited scan area.24" Arm-7 E N2-D N 00 N9-A iL
_ GE Energy Nuclear UT Examination Summary Report No. 2R10-014 Project: LaSalle Unit-2, L2R1O Component ID: LCS-2-N2F System: Recirculation Inlet Calibration ID: 01NOZ.IN GERIS Data: TL, P1 and 70TP scan files Manual Data: N/A Examiners:
C. Gauthier Lv. II, S. Gauthier Lv. II Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code, Section XI, 1989 Edition No Addenda, also Section XI, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PDI program description and the Federal Register, Part II, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 50 for Category B-A Reactor Vessel (RPV) Assembly Welds.Automated transverse and parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure GE-UT-705 V4 using 450 Shear wave, 60 RL&deg; and 70* RL search units, supplemental 00 L-wave scans were also performed.
Scanning of the inner 15%T volume for radial flaws was performed using 450 and 600 Shear wave search units as specified by the "Nozzle Inner Radius and Bore Requirements" sheet, which has been verified by modeling.Automated scanning was performed from the vessel OD surface.For calibration records refer to report G2K-CAL-1.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system "0" references are located at Vessel 0' Azimuth and Vessel 0 Elevation.
The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded no indications.Previous examination results were reviewed and no changes were noted.Automated Composite Coverage = 70%.Prepared By: Reviewed Ely: Utility Reviewed By: ANII Reviewed By: Date:2 1 0 -5 Date: ;L 6 -a S-- Date 7 --Date: LaSalle Unit-2, L2R1O Page 1 of 1)
(n 9i CD C 0 CD Inspection Report No.: 2R10-014 Recirculation Inlet LCS-2-N2F LaSalle Unit-2, L2R10 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Percent Weld Length = 360. Required Exam Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent Exam Volume = 59.1 Area Sq. In. Auto Auto Auto Auto 700 T-Scan A 11.4 5.8 9.8% 360 4.9%450 T-Scan A 39.2 33.5 56.7% 360 28.3%60' T-Scan A 8.5 8.5 14.4% 360 7.2%700 P-Scan A 11.4 4.5 7.6% 360 3.8%450 P-Scan A 39.2 22.5 38.1% 360 19.0%Inner 15%T P-Scan A 8.5 8.5 14.4% 360 7.2%70' T-Scan 450 T-Scan 600 T-Scan 700 P-Scan 450 P-Scan Inner 15%T P-Scan 700 T-Scan 450 T-Scan 600 T-Scan 700 P-Scan 450 P-Scan Inner 15%T P-Scan% Total Composite Coverage =70%0 Comments:
A -Examined 3600 of length. Scanning limited due to nozzle configuration.
Inner 15%T P-Scan area by modeling.Note -Rounding methods may make calculated values appear in error.
CD LaSalle Unit-2 Recirculation Inlet 700 Exam Volume = 11.4 Sq In.450 Exam Volume = 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 60 0 T) = 8.5 Sq. In.700 T-Scan achieved = 5.8 Sq. In.450 T-Scan achieved = 33.5 Sq. In.600 T-Scan achieved = 8.5 Sq. In.17.25" 70&deg;T 45&deg;T 60 'T-o C))0)CD/I ________ ________
LaSalle Unit-2 Recirculation Inlet 700 Exam Volume = 11.4 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume = 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 60 0 T) = 8.5 Sq. In.70' P-Scan achieved = 4.5 Sq. In.450 P-Scan achieved = 22.5 Sq. In.IRS P-Scan achieved = 8.5 Sq. In. (By model)17.25" 70'P 45&deg;P*I I-----H I 0 GE Energy Nuclear UT Examination Summary Report No. 2R10-015 Project: LaSalle Unit-2, L2R1O Component ID.: LCS-2-N2G System: Recirculation Inlet Calibration ID: 01NOZIN GERIS Data: TL, P1 and 70TP scan filesManual Data:
N/A Examiners:
C. Gauthier Lv. II, S. Gauthier Lv. II Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code, Section Xl, 1989 Edition No Addenda, also Section XI, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PDI program description and the Federal Register, Part II, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 50 for Category B-D Reactor Vessel (RPV) Assembly Welds.Automated transverse and parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure GE-UT-705 V4 using 450 Shear wave, 60 RL' and 700 RL search units, supplemental 00 L-wave scans were also performed.
Scanning of the inner 15%T volume for radial flaws was performed using 450 and 600 Shear wave search units as specified by the "Nozzle Inner Radius and Bore Requirements" sheet, which has been verified by modeling.Automated scanning was performed from the vessel OD surface.For calibration records refer to report G2K-CAL-1.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system "0" references are located at Vessel 0' Azimuth and Vessel 0 Elevation.
The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded no indications.
Previous examination results were reviewed and no changes were noted.
Automated Composite Coverage
= 70%.LL LaSalle Unit-2, L2R1O Page 1 of I-ch 9L CD (D Inspection Report No.: 2R10-015 Recirculation Inlet LCS-2-N2G LaSalle Unit-2, L2R10 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Percent Weld Length = 360. Required Exam Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent Exam Volume = 59.1 Area Sq. In. Auto Auto Auto Auto 70* T-Scan A 11.4 5.8 9.8% 360 4.9%450 T-Scan A 39.2 33.5 56.7% 360 28.3%600 T-Scan A 8.5 8.5 14.4% 360 7.2%70' P-Scan A 11.4 4.5 7.6% 360 3.8%450 P-Scan A 39.2 22.5 38.1% 360 19.0%Inner 15%T P-Scan A 8.5 8.5 14.4% 360 7.2%700 T-Scan 450 T-Scan 600 T-Scan 70_ P-Scan 450 P-Scan Inner 15%T P-Scan 70o T-Scan 450 T-Scan 60' T-Scan 700 P-Scan 45' P-Scan Inner 15%T P-Scan% Total Composite Coverage =70%0 Comments: A -Examined 3600 of length. Scanning limited due to nozzle configuration.
Inner 15%T P-Scan area by modeling.Note -Rounding methods may make calculated values appear in error.
0, C,, CD C>C)CD,-J 0)Co/LaSalle Unit-2 Recirculation Inlet 700 Exam Volume = 11.4 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume = 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 60 0 T) = 8.5 Sq. In.700 T-Scan achieved'=
5.8 Sq. In.450 T-Scan achieved = 33.5 Sq. In.600 T-Scan achieved = 8.5 Sq. In.17.25" 707T I 457T I 607T----1 I O,)C/0 0 C:'/I _______ ________
LaSalle Unit-2 Recirculation Inlet 700 Exam Volume = 11.4 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume = 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 60 0 T) = 8.5 Sq. In.700 P-Scan achieved = 4.5 Sq. In.450 P-Scan achieved = 22.5 Sq. In.IRS P-Scan achieved = 8.5 Sq. In. (By model)17.25" 70TP 45&deg;P I I-----A I--0 GE Energy Nuclear UT Examination Summary Report No. 2R10-016 Project: LaSalle Unit-2, L2R10 Component ID: LCS-2-N2H System: Recirculation Inlet Calibration ID: O1NOZ.IN GERIS Data: TL, P1 and 70TP scan filesManual Data:
N/A Examiners:
C. Gauthier Lv. II, S. Gauthier Lv. II Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code, Section XI, 1989 Edition No Addenda, also Section XI, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PDI program description and the Federal Register, Part II, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 50 for Category B-D Reactor Vessel (RPV) Assembly Welds.
Automated transverse and parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure GE-UT-705 V4 using 450 Shear wave, 60 RL&deg; and 700 RL search units, supplemental 00 L-wave scans were also performed.
Scanning of the inner 15%T volume for radial flaws was performed using 450 and 600 Shear wave search units as specified by the "Nozzle Inner Radius and Bore Requirements" sheet, which has been verified by modeling.Automated scanning was performed from the vessel OD surface.For calibration records refer to report G2K-CAL-1.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system "0" references are located at Vessel 0&deg; Azimuth and Vessel 0 Elevation.
The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded no indications.
Previous examination results were reviewed and no changes were noted.Automated Composite Coverage = 70%.Prepared By: Rewed By: Ut Re.viewed By: ANII Reviewed By: Date: Date: Date Date: La~ale Uit-, L210 agelf I LaSalle Unit-2, L2R1O Page 1 of I I
-U Q)0)Inspection Report No.: 2R10-016 Recirculation Inlet LCS-2-N2H LaSalle Unit-2, L2R10 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Percent Weld Length = 360. Required Exam Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent Exam Volume = 59.1 Area Sq. In. Auto Auto Auto Auto 700 T-Scan A 11.4 5.8 9.8% 308.4 4.2%450 T-Scan A 39.2 33.5 56.7% 308.4 24.3%600 T-Scan A 8.5 8.5 14.4% 308.4 6.2%700 P-Scan A 11.4 4.5 7.6% 308.4 3.3%45' P-Scan A 39.2 22.5 38.1% 308.4 16.3%Inner 15%T P-Scan A 8.5 8.5 14.4% 308.4 6.2%70' T-Scan B 11.4 5.8 9.8% 51.6 0.7%450 T-Scan B 39.2 33.5 56.7% 51.6 4.1%600 T-Scan B 8.5 4.8 8.1% 51.6 0.6%700 P-Scan B 11.4 6.6 11.2% 51.6 0.8%450 P-Scan B&#xfd; 39.2 22.5 38.1% 51.6 2.7%Inner 15%T P-Scan B 8.5 8.5 14.4% 51.6 1.0%70&deg; T-Scan 450 T-Scan 600 T-Scan 700 P-Scan 450 P-Scan Inner 15%T P-Scan% Total Composite Coverage =70%Comments:
A -Examined 308.40 of length. Scanning limited due to proximity of N9 nozzle.B -Examined 51.60 of length in area of N9 nozzle.Inner 15%T P-Scan area by modeling.Note -Rounding methods may make calculated values appear in error.
CD 0 0/LaSalle Unit-2 Recirculation Inlet 70&deg; Exam Volume = 11.4 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume = 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 60*T) = 8.5 Sq. In.70&deg; T-Scan achieved = 5.8 Sq. In.450 T-Scan achieved = 33.5 Sq. In.60' T-Scan achieved
= 8.5 Sq. In.17.25" 707T I 45&deg;T I 60'T I~~~~17<I I-CD)C:=.3 0 0 CD 00 0 I LaSalle Unit-2 Recirculation Inlet 70' Exam Volume = 11.4 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume = 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 607T) = 8.5 Sq. In.70&deg; T-Scan achieved = 5.8 Sq. In.450 T-Scan achieved = 33.5 Sq. In.60' T-Scan achieved = 6.6 Sq. In.Limited area due to N9.17.25" 70'T I 45*T 60*T I I I-" Cn CD CD-J 0)-o 0-4'"K LaSalle Unit-2 Recirculation Inlet 700 Exam Volume = 11.4 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume = 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 60&deg;T) = 8.5 Sq. In.700 P-Scan achieved = 4.5 Sq. In.450 P-Scan achieved = 22.5 Sq. In.IRS P-Scan achieved = 8.5 Sq. In. (By model)17.25"/70op 45oP I I K----F-----
Unlimited scan area.24" Arm N2-J N9-B T/C PADS C,, I-I-Ph 0 GE Energy Nuclear UT Examination Summary Report No. 2R10-017 Project: LaSalle Unit-2, L2R1O Component ID: LCS-2-N2J System: Recirculation Inlet Calibration ID: 01NOZ.IN GERIS Data: TL, P1 and 70TP scan files Manual Data: N/A Examiners:
C. Gauthier Lv. II, S. Gauthier Lv. II Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code, Section XI, 1989 Edition No Addenda, also Section XI, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PDI program description and the Federal Register, Part I, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 50 for Category B-D Reactor Vessel (RPV) Assembly Welds.
Automated transverse and parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure GE-UT-705 V4 using 450 Shear wave, 60 RL 0 and 700 RL search units, supplemental 0&deg; L-wave scans were also performed.
Scanning of the inner 15%T volume for radial flaws was performed using 450 and 600 Shear wave search units as specified by the "Nozzle Inner Radius and Bore Requirements" sheet, which has been verified by modeling.Automated scanning was performed from the vessel OD surface.For calibration records refer to report G2K-CAL-1.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated uT system "0" references are located at Vessel 0&deg; Azimuth and Vessel 0 Elevation.
The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded no indications.
Previous examination results were reviewed and no changes were noted.Automated Composite Coverage = 70%.LaSalle Unit-2, L2R1O Page I of "
CO)Ui)(D T 0 Inspection Report No.: 2R10-017 Recirculation Inlet LCS-2-N2J LaSalle Unit-2, L2R10 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Percent Weld Length = 360. Required Exam Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent Exam Volume = 59.1 Area Sq. In. Auto Auto Auto Auto 700 T-Scan A 11.4 5.8 9.8% 307.2 4.2%450 T-Scan A 39.2 33.5 56.7% 307.2 24.2%60&deg; T-Scan A 8.5 8.5 14.4% 307.2 6.1%70_ P-Scan A 11.4 4.5 7.6% 307.2 3.2%450 P-Scan A 39.2 22.5 38.1% 307.2 16.2%Inner 15%T P-Scan A 8.5 8.5 14.4% 307.2 6.1%700 T-Scan B 11.4 5.8 9.8% 52.8 0.7%450 T-Scan B _ 39.2 33.5 56.7% 52.8 4.2%60' T-Scan B 8.5 7.5 12.7% 52.8 0.9%70' P-Scan B 11.4 4.5 7.6% 52.8 0.6%450 P-Scan B 39.2 22.5 38.1% 52.8 2.8%Inner 15%T P-Scan B 8.5 8.5 14.4% 52.8 1.1%700 T-Scan 450 T-Scan 600 T-Scan 70' P-Scan 450 P-Scan Inner 15%T P-Scan% Total Composite Coverage =70%Comments:
A -Examined 308.4' of length. Scanning limited due to proximity of N9 nozzle.B -Examined 51.60 of length in area of N9 nozzle.Inner 15%T P-Scan area by modeling.Note -Rounding methods may make calculated values appear in error.
c--13 0/I LaSalle Unit-2 Recirculation Inlet 70&deg; Exam Volume = 11.4 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume = 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 60 0 T) = 8.5 Sq. In.70&deg; T-Scan achieved = 5.8 Sq. In.450 T-Scan achieved = 33.5 Sq. In.600 T-Scan achieved = 8.5 Sq. In.17.25" 70OT I 457T I 60&deg;T I---H I
-1 0, CD, 0, 0 0)I K---LaSalle Unit-2 Recirculation Inlet 700 Exam Volume = 11.4 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume = 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 60 0 T) = 8.5 Sq. In.700 T-Scan achieved = 5.8 Sq. In.450 T-Scan achieved = 33.5 Sq. In.600 T-Scan achieved = 7.5 Sq. In.Limited area due to N9.17.25" 70'T I 45&deg;T I 60'T I-I C/)CD 0 U1 I LaSalle Unit-2 Recirculation Inlet 70&deg; Exam Volume
= 11.4 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume = 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 60&deg;T) = 8.5 Sq. In.70&deg; P-Scan achieved = 4.5 Sq. In.450 P-Scan achieved = 22.5 Sq. In.IRS P-Scan achieved = 8.5 Sq. In. (By model)17.25" F------70iP45i cc 0 I Unlimited scan area.24" Arm N2-H 0 N9-B T/C PADS)V GE Energy Nuclear ( UT Examination Summary Report No. 2R10-018 Project: LaSalle Unit-2, L2R10 Component ID: LCS-2-N2K System: Recirculation Inlet Calibration ID: 01NOZIN GERIS Data: TL, P1 and 70TP scan files Manual Data: N/A Examiners:
C. Gauthier Lv. II, S. Gauthier Lv. IIUltrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code, Section Xl, 1989 Edition No Addenda, also Section Xl, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PDI program description and the Federal Register, Part II, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 50 for Category B-D Reactor Vessel (RPV) Assembly Welds.Automated transverse and parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure GE-UT-705 V4 using 450 Shear wave, 60 RL&deg; and 700 RL search units, supplemental 00 L-wave scans were also performed.
Scanning of the inner 15%T volume for radial flaws was performed using 45* and 60&deg; Shear wave search units as specified by the "Nozzle Inner Radius and Bore Requirements" sheet, which has been verified by modeling.Automated scanning was performed from the vessel OD surface.For calibration records refer to report G2K-CAL-1.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system "0" references are located at Vessel 00 Azimuth and Vessel 0 Elevation.
The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded no indications.
Previous examination results were reviewed and no changes were noted.Automated Composite Coverage = 70%.I LaSalle Unit-2, L2R1 0 Page 1 of 10 Inspection Report No.: 2R10-018 Recirculation Inlet LCS-2-N2K LaSalle Unit-2, L2R10 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Percent Weld Length = 360. Required Exam Area Scanned of Area Weld Length PercentExam Volume
= 59.1 Area Sq. In. Auto Auto Auto Auto 70&deg; T-Scan A 11.4 5.8 9.8% 360 4.9%450 T-Scan A 39.2 33.5 56.7% 360 28.3%600 T-Scan A 8.5 8.5 14.4% 360 7.2%700 P-Scan A 11.4 4.5 7.6% 360 3.8%450 P-Scan_ A 39.2 22.5 38.1% 360 19.0%Inner 15%T P-Scan A 8.5 8.5 14.4% 360 7.2%700 T-Scan 450 T-Scan 600 T-Scan 700 P-Scan 450 P-Scan Inner 15%T P-Scan 70_ T-Scan 450 T-Scan 600 T-Scan 700 P-Scan 450 P-Scan Inner 15%T P-Scan% Total Composite Coverage =70%ho Comments:
A -Examined 3600 of length. Scanning limited due to nozzle configuration.
Inner 15%T P-Scan area by modeling.Note -Rounding methods may make calculated values appear in error.
On a C')C LaSalle Unit-2 N)0. Recirculation Inlet 700 Exam Volume = 11.4 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume = 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 60 0 T) = 8.5 Sq. In.707 T-Scan achieved = 5.8 Sq. In.450 T-Scan achieved = 33.5 Sq. In.600 T-Scan achieved = 8.5 Sq. In.707T 45&deg;T 60'T I I CD 0 C), Cz:3 C-fl I LaSalle Unit-2 Recirculation Inlet 700 Exam Volume = 11.4 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume = 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 60&deg;T) = 8.5 Sq. In.70&deg; P-Scan achieved = 4.5 Sq. In.450 P-Scan achieved = 22.5 Sq. In.IRS P-Scan achieved = 8.5 Sq. In. (By model)17.25" 70'P 45 0 PI I I -K------4----1 4")0 Jl I I GE Energy Nuclear ( UT Examination Summary Report No. 2R10-019 Project: LaSalle'Unit-2, L2R10 Component ID: LCS-2-N3A System: Main Steam Calibration ID: 03NOZ.IN GERIS Data: TL, P1 and 70TP scan files Manual Data: N/A Examiners:
C. Gauthier Lv. II, S. Gauthier Lv. II Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code, Section XI, 1989 Edition No Addenda, also Section Xl, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PDI program description and the Federal Register, Part II, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 50 for Category B-A Reactor Vessel (RPV) Assembly Welds.Automated transverse and parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure GE-UT-705 V4 using 450 Shear wave, 60 RL&deg; and 70" RL search units, supplemental 00 L-wave scans were also performed.
Scanning of the inner 15%T volume for radial flaws was performed using 450 and 600 Shear wave search units as specified by the "Nozzle Inner Radius and Bore Requirements" sheet, which has been verified by modeling.Automated scanning was performed from the vessel OD surface.For calibration records refer to report G2K-CAL-1.The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system "0" references are located at Vessel 0Q Azimuth and Vessel 0 Elevation.
The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded no indications.
Previous examination results were reviewed and no changes were noted.Automated Composite Coverage = 68%.7-1/"P1epared By- Reviewed y: Utility Reviewed By: ANII Reviewed By: Date: Z/ ,{OS Date: AZ -z 4 Date 2-- QI-O --Date: LaSalle Unit-2, L2R1O Page 1 of -I-Ul)CD 0-4,Inspection Report No.: 2R10-036 Main Steam LCS-2-N3A LaSalle Unit-2, L2R10 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Percent Weld Length = 360. Required Exam Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent Exam Volume = 77.2 Area Sq. In. Auto Auto Auto Auto 700 T-Scan A 14.1 6.3 8.2% 360 4.1%450 T-Scan A 52.1 43.5 56.3% 360 28.2%60' T-Scan A 11.0 11.0 14.2% 360 7.1%700 P-Scan A 14.1 5.0 6.5% 360 3.2%450 P-Scan A 52.1 1 28.2 36.5% 360 18.3%Inner 15%T P-Scan. A 11.0 11.0 14.2% 360 7.1%70' T-Scan 450 T-Scan 600 T-Scan 700 P-Scan 450 P-Scan Inner 15%T P-Scan 700 T-Scan 45' T-Scan 600 T-Scan 700 P-Scan 450 P-Scan Inner 15%T P-Scan% Total Composite Coverage =68%Comments:
A -Examined 3600 of length. Scanning limited due to nozzle configuration.
Inner 15%T P-Scan area by modeling.Note- Rounding methods may make calculated values appear in error.
Cl LaSalle Unit-2 DMain Steam 70&deg; Exam Volume = 14.1 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume = 52.1 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 60 0 T) = 11.0 Sq. In.70&deg; T-Scan achieved = 6.3 Sq. In.450 T-Scan achieved = 43.5 Sq. In.600 T-Scan achieved = 11.0 Sq. In.[70OT 45&deg;T 60'T T/I I I V -1 C'Cn CD CO 0 LaSalle Unit-2 Main Steam 700 Exam Volume = 14.1 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume = 52.1 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 60 0 T) = 11.0 Sq. In.700 P-Scan achieved = 5.0 Sq. In.450 P-Scan achieved = 28.2 Sq. In.IRS P-Scan achieved = 11.0 Sq. In. (By model)/H-----I---I----4 GE Energy Nuclear UT Examination Summary Report No. 2R10-020 Project: LaSalle Unit-2, L2R1O Weld ID: LCS-2-N3B System: Main Steam Calibration ID: 03NOZ.IN GERIS Data: TL, P1 and 70TP scan files.Manual Data:
N/A Examiners:
C. Gauthier Lv. II, S. Gauthier Lv. IIUltrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code, Section Xl, 1989 Edition No Addenda, also Section Xl, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PDI program description and the Federal Register, Part II, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 50 for Category B-A Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) Assembly Welds.Automated transverse and parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedure GE-UT-705 V4, using 450 Shear wave, 600 RL and 700 RL search units, supplemental 0' L-wave scans were also performed.
Scanning of the inner 15%T volume for radial flaws was performed using 600 Shear waves as specified by the "Nozzle Inner Radius and Bore Requirements" sheet which has been verified by modeling.Automated scanning was performed from the vessel OD surface.For calibration records refer to report G2K-CAL-1.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system "0" references are located at Vessel 0" Azimuth and Vessel 0 Elevation.
The GERIS 2000 OD system recorded no indications.
Previous examination results were reviewed and no changes were noted.Automated Composite Coverage = 68%.LaSalle Unit-2, L2R1O Page I of 9 Cl)R1 CD (D 0 h1 Inspection Report No.: 2R10-020 Main Steam LCS-2-N3B LaSalle Unit-2, L2R10 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Percent Weld Length = 360. Required Exam Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent Exam Volume = 77.2 Area Sq. In. Auto Auto Auto Auto 700 T-Scan A 14.1 6.3 8.2% 360 4.1%450 T-Scan A 52.1 43.5 56.3% 360 28.2%60 0 T-Scan A 11.0 11.0 14.2% 360 7.1%70" P-Scan A 14.1 5.0 6.5% 360 3.2%450 P-Scan A 52.1 28.2 36.5% 360 18.3%Inner 15%T P-Scan A 11.0 11.0 14.2% 360 7.1%700 T-Scan 450 T-Scan 600 T-Scan 700 P-Scan 450 P-Scan Inner 15%T P-Scan 70_ T-Scan 450 T-Scan 600 T-Scan 700 P-Scan 450 P-Scan Inner I 5%T P-Scan% Total Composite Coverage =68%Comments:
A -Examined 3600 of length. Scanning limited due to nozzle configuration.
Inner 15%T P-Scan area by modeling.Note -Rounding methods may make calculated values appear in error.
I--C C)0 (--.LaSalle Unit-2 Main Steam 70' Exam Volume = 14.1 Sq. In.45&deg; Exam Volume = 52.1 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 60 0 T) = 11.0 Sq. In.70&deg; T-Scan achieved
= 6.3 Sq. In.450 T-Scan achieved = 43.5 Sq. In.600 T-Scan achieved = 11.0 Sq. In.//70&deg;T I 45&deg;T I 607T I CD 0 h--t----
I-C CD 0 0 01"10 CD LaSalle Unit-2 Main Steam 70&deg; Exam Volume
= 14.1 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume = 52.1 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 607T) = 11.0 Sq. In.700 P-Scan achieved = 5.0 Sq. In.450 P-Scan achieved = 28.2 Sq. In.IRS P-Scan achieved = 11.0 Sq. In. (By model)70'P45 oPI I Hi l/-l 0 GE NUCLEAR ENERGY EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET LaSalle Unit 2 L2R10 RPV-SS-2 Component ID: ATT Configuration:
RPV System: B-K ASME Cat: Sec. XI Exam Credit.: Examination Ceit Exam Exams Data Cal Procedure Revision Calibration Personnel Level Completed Performed Sheet Sheet Block W. Lt DeBusk I1 2/26/05 PT PT-06 N/A GE-PT-10OVer.4 N/A VT-I 05-198 N/A ER-AA-335-014 R.1 N/A Examination Results: During the liquid penetrant and visual examinations of the above referenced weld, no recordable indications were detected.Due to adajacent structures only 52% of the required examination area was accessable for inspections.
Due to this limiting condition a VT-1 examination was performed on 100% of the required examination area.This examination meets the requirements of ASME Section Xl, 1989 Edition, no Addenda Examination results were compared to data report None from N/A outage with N/A No Change These examinations were performed under Work Order: 5849600 N/A Change This Summary and the following data sheets have been reviewed and accepted bv the following personnel
,_- fi u 't r g /nnelDose:
20 mr.Gevie B Level: Date: Reviewed By: Title: Date: Reviewed BY: Level: Date: ANI Reviewed By: Title: Date: Page 1 of 3 (GE Nuclear Energy LIQUID PENETRANT EXAMINATION REPORT Site: LaSalle Unit: 2 Project: L2RIO Report Number: 2R10-061 Data Sheet: PT-06 Component ID: RPV-SS 2 Configuration:
Attachment Drawing: GEL-1119 / VPF 3073-080-2 System: RPV Procedure No.: GE-PT-1O0 Ver4 Material:
Surface Condition:
Item: SA-533 As-found/Cleaned Weld Technique Cleaner Penetrant Developer Visible Solvent Removable (B-3) Manufacturer:
Ma-anaflux Magnaflux Magnaflux Thermometer:
241997 Brand / Type: SKC-S SKL-SP SKD-S2 Temperature:
88*F Batch No.: 03LOK 01HO4K 03A03K Black Light: N/A Light Meter N/A Blacklight Intensity:
N/A piW/cm 2 Pre-Clean Method: Siray / Wipe Exam Start: 0240 /2/26/05 Penetrant Application Brush Drying Time: Dwell Time: 10 Penetrant Removal: Wipe with dry towel Wipe with damp towel Drying Time: 5 Developer Application:
Snray Developing Time: 7 Comments I Indications I Limitations:
PT examination performed on accessabie areas of the ./attachment lug. See sketch for examination area.52% of the required area was examined.No recordable indications were detected.iIi 1 '[NA CC C(SSi h 6 SW. L. DeBusk 11 2/26/05 Initials:
Examiner:
Level: Exam Date: Reviewed By: Date: 3' 2g" o U5 Pge o GF-evled Level: Date: ANII Reviewed By: Date: Form:Pipc Wdd Rmord # 146 ER-AA-335-014 QLL 4 ~3 Revision I ATTACHMENT I VT-1 Visual Examination Record IComponent
 
==
Description:==
 
R ]t" c AneA,j -Sheet No. 05- 1 c8 Date: 2/ 6/O/SWO No. 58$9(600 Procedure:
ER-RR-33S-O0g Rev. I Thickness:
AJ/ 1A Visual Method:
Direct X Remote MaterlalToo:
C -S S39 VisualAids:
FL-s Li Lo&. ' /76N C Surface: 1D OD X M&TE: NJ/A Items ln~eed(l'N):
R2 V,-'S ; /h':ral 804. , CID'o I.D. IN LEGHWDHAC RINPCO LVL Numbe IND# TYP ENT WDH UNACC SIGNATURE/DATE Comments/Sketch:
Defect Code: 4o he h5 Wewre A'ote-7 Wear-W.Jc~s,'~s~oe7'7~~j'fa( ~o~ ~Corrosion-CR Damage-D Erosion-ER Cracds-C VT-1 INSPECTOR SIGNATURE/LEVEL/DATE 1 U Overall results: Acceptable QVes ONo W t- De6usk Additional Actions: 4,,,- ,. &#xfd; -(Action Request, Work Order, Condition Report, etc. initiated)
LX LEVEL III SIGNATURE DATE ANII SIGNATURE DATEj (
Report No.: EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET 2R11-oos GE ENERGY, NUCLEAR Site: LaSolle Component ID: GEL-1060-AG Outage: L2R11 TOP HEAD FLANGE System: RPV ASME Cat.: B-A ASME Item 81.40 Aug Req SECT XI Exams Data Sheet Cal Sheet Procedure Calibration Block 1 Examination Cert Level Date Performed
' Personnel 60 RL D-007 N/A GE-UT-300 Ver/Rev 10 CAL-IIW2-026 Jack Reisewitz II 3i2/2007 60' RL D-008 N/A GE-UT-300 Ver/Rev 10 i 01-92-04 Jack Reisewitz II 312/2007 60&deg; RL D-009 N/A GE-UT-300 Ver/Rev 10 CAL-11W2-033 Mario Russomanno II 3/3/2007 60' RL D-010 N/A 1 GE-UT-300 Ver/Rev 10 01-92-04 Mario Russomanno 1I 3/3/2007 MT MT-001 N/A GE-MT-100 Ver/Rev 8 N/A Wallace Reid II 3/2/2007 Examination Results: During the manual ultrasonic examination of the above referenced weld, no recordable indications were detected utilizing a 600 refracted longitudinal wave search unit.A magnetic particle surface examination was also performed from 180&deg; to 3600 with no recordable indications.
No recordable indications were detected.80.6% Code coverage was achieved.This examination is acceptable per the requirements of ASME Section X1 1995 Edition, 1996 Addenda.Examination results were compared to data report D-188A from 1996 outage with V: No Change These examinations were performed under Work Order: 00821549 .. Change This Summary and the following data sheets have been reviewed and accepted by the following personnel:
RWP: N/A/. 2Do se: S 9 mr.Prepared By: Date: Utility Review: Dote: ANII Review: Date: Page 1 of 8 GE Energy, Nuclear MAGNETIC PARTICLE EXAMINATION REPORT Reor NubrI2I-0 Site: LaSalle Unit: 2 Project: L2RXX Report Number: 2R11-005 Sheet No.: MT-O01 Weld No.: GEL-1060-AG Configuration:
TOP HEAD FLANGE Drawing: GEL-1060 System: RPV Procedure No.: GE-MT-100 Version / Revision 8 DRR: N/A Material:
Surface Condition:
Item: Carbon Steel Ground Smooth Weld -Final Magnetizing Apparatus Black Light Mfg: Parker Research Yoke Calibration:
2/14/08 Model Serial Number Model: B-300 Blacklight N/A N/A Serial No.: 5502 Yoke Spacing: 6.0' Light Meter N/A N/A Thermometer:
251804 Surface Temperature:
75 &deg; F Technique Examination Medium Blocklight Intensity Magnetization:
AC Magnetic Particles:
P-y N/A Technique:
Continuous Magnaflux 8A Red 93AO45 Blacklight intensity.
Manufacturer:
Particle Type: Botch No Indication Numbe ................... ............
..........................................................
Results: NIA N/A NRI Comments: No recordable-indications.
Light Source: Yoke with ECT Light 12V/10W Exam Area: Examined 1800 to 360'Wallace Reid JiA.J P, It 3/2/200 Utility Review Dote iitial Examiner Level Date GE Review Level Dote ANti Review Date Page 6 of 8 Wj E (D Reactor Pressure Vessel GE Energy -Nuclear Coverage Calculation Sheet LaSalle Unit-2, 2007 GEL-1 060-AG L2R11 C.'CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Percent Weld Length = 180. Required Exam Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent Exam Volume = 35.8 Area Sq. In. Manual Manual Manual Manual 600 T-Scan (S4 UP) A 5.2 0 0.0% 180 0.0%60' T-Scan (S4 DN) A 5.2 5.2 14.5% 180 3.6%600 T-Scan (S6) A* 30.6 29 81.0% 180 40.5%600 P-Scan (S4 CW) A 5.2 3.9 10.9% 180 2.7%600 P-Scan (S4 CCW) A 5.2 3.9 10.9% 180 2.7%600 P-Scan (S6) A 30.6 22.2 62.0% 180 31.0%600 T-Scan (S4 UP)60&deg; T-Scan (S4 DN)600 T-Scan (S6)600 P-Scan (S4 CW)600 P-Scan (S4 CCW)600 P-Scan (S6)600 T-Scan (S4 UP)60' T-Scan (S4 DN)600 T-Scan (S6)600 P-Scan (S4 CW)'600 P-Scan (S4 CCW)600 P-Scan (S6)(D~04% Total Composite Coverage =80.6%Rev. 1 3/4107 Comments: Scanning limited looking up due to the flange configuration.
Examined from 1800 CW to 3600 Az. as scheduled.
A* -Single side access, 50% credit of the achieved Supplement 4 T-scan volume claimed.Note -Rounding methods may affect calculated values. Weld length in degrees.
K N N Ni I LaSalle Unit-2 Closure Head Flange 600 S4 Exam Volume = 5.2 Sq. In.600 S6 Exam Volume = 30.6 Sq. In.60' S4 P-Scan LKCW achieved = 3.9 Sq. In.600 S4 P-Scan LKCCW achieved = 3.9 Sq. In.600 S6 P-Scan achieved = 22.2 Sq. In.600 S4 T-Scan LKDN achieved = 5.2 Sq. In.600 S4 T-Scan LKUP achieved = 0.0.Sq. In.60' S6 T-Scan achieved = 29.0 Sq. In.13-&#xfd;'Head Scan I N~Flange -.+-imited due to Flange configuration.
>,, Radial Plate T Norm. = 5.125" Clad T Nom. = 0.1875" OGE Energy Nuclear Examination SummarySheet ( _______________________Report No.: 2R11-007 Site: LaSalle Unit-2 Component ID: LCS-2-N16A Outage: L2R11 Configuration:
Nozzle to Shell System: RPV ASME Cot: B-0 ASME Item: B3.90 Aug. Requirements:
N/A Exams Calibration Calibration Examination NDE Performed:
Sheet(s):
Block: Procedure:
Personnel:
Level: Dote: 0&deg;L NOZ 01-92-01 GE-UT-704/705 C. Gauthier II 3/3/07 4505 NOZ 01-92-01 GE-UT-704/705 C. Gauthier II 3/3/07 60*L NOZ 01-92-01 GE-UT-704/705 C. Gauthier II 3/3/07 70'L NOZ 01-92-01 GE-UT-704/705 C. Gauthier II 3/3/07 45 0 S IRS 01-92-01 GE-UT-705 C. Gauthier II 3/4/07 6005 IRS 01-92-01 GE-UT-705 C. Gauthier II 3/4/07 Comments: Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code Section XI, 1989 Edition no Addenda, also Section XI, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PD! program description and the Federal Register, Part II, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Port 50 for Category B-D Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) Assembly Welds.Automated transverse and parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedures GE-UT-704 V8 and GE-UT-705 V5, using 450 Shear wave, 60' RL, and 700 RL search units, supplemental 00 L-Wave scans were also performed.
Nozzle Inner 15%T circ scans were performed in accordance with Model validated search unit angles.Automated scanning was performed from the vessel OD surface. and was restricted due to the nozzle configuration.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system 0 reference is located at 900 CW of nozzle TDC.One acceptable indication was recorded.Automated Composite Coverage = 70.5%The examination results were compared with data report D-436 from L2R03 outage with [ No Change These examinations were performed under Work Order: N/A E Change This summary and the following data sheets hove been reviewed and accepted by the following personnel:
Prepared By: Level Dote: Utility Reviej By: Dote: ANIl Reviewed 3v: Oote: Page 1 of /C) r-c)C (D Reactor Pressure Vessel GE Energy- Nuclear Coverage Calculation Sheet LaSalle Unit-2, 2007 LCS-2-N16A L2R11 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Weld Length = 360. Required Exam Area Scanned Percent Exam Volume = 59.1 Area Sq. In. Auto. of Area Weld Length Percent 60' T-Scan (S4 UC) A* 8.5 8.5 14.4% 360 7.2%450 T-Scan (S6 FV) A* 39.2 33.5 56.7% 360 28.3%70' T-Scan (S6 NS) A* 11.4 5.8 9.8% 360 4.9%IRS P-Scan (S4 UC) A 8.5 8.5 14.4% 360 7.2%450 P-Scan (S6 FV) A 39.2 22.5 38.1% 360 19.0%70' P-Scan (S6 NS) A 11.4 4.5 7.6% 360 3.8%600 T-Scan (S4 UC)450 T-Scan (S6 FV)700 T-Scan (S6 NS)IRS P-Scan (S4 UC)450 P-Scan (S6 FV)700 P-Scan (S6 NS)60' T-Scan (S4 UC)450 T-Scan (S6 FV)700 T-Scan (S6 NS)IRS P-Scan (S4 UC)450 P-Scan (S6 FV)70' P-Scan (S6 NS)(D 0% Iotal Composite Coverage =70.5%Rev 0 Comments: Scanning limited due to nozzle configuration.
IRS P-Scan by modeling.A* -Single side access, 100% credit of the achieved Supplement 4 T-scan volume claimed iaw. 10CFR50.55a.
Note -Rounding methods may affect calculated values. UC-Underclad, FV-Full volume, NS-Near Surface. Weld length in degrees.
CD 0 0/LaSalle Unit-2 LCS-2-N 16A (HPCS)70' Exam Volume = 11.4 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume = 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 60 0 T) = 8.5 Sq. In.70' T-Scan achieved = 5.8 Sq. In.450 T-Scan achieved = 33.5 Sq. In.600 T-Scan achieved = 8.5 Sq. In.17.25" 70'T I 45&deg;T I 60'T I----CD 0 h1 C,.CUx ----LaSalle Unit-2 LCS-2-N 16A (HPCS)700 Exam Volume = 11.4 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume = 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 607T) = 8.5 Sq. In.700 P-Scan achieved = 4.5 Sq. In.450 P-Scan achieved = 22.5 Sq. In.IRS P-Scan achieved = 8.5 Sq. In. (By model)17.25" 70'P 45'P K----CD 0 GE Enerq Nuclear Examination Summary Sheet W 'G EnrgyNucearReport No.: 2RII-008 Site: LaSalle Unit-2 Component ID: LCS-2-N2A Outage: L2R11 Configuration:
Nozzle to Shell System: RPV ASME Cat: B-D ASME Item: 83.90 Aug. Requirements:
N/A Exams Calibration Calibration Examination NDE Performed:
Sheet(s):
Block: Procedure:
Personnel:
Level: Date: 0 0 L NOZ 01-92-01 GE-UT-704/705 K. Montgomery II 3/7/07 450S NOZ 01-92-01 GE-UT-704/705 K. Montgomery II 3/7/07 60'L NOZ 01-92-01 GE-UT-704/705 K. Montgomery II 3/7/07 70 0 L NOZ 01-92-01 GE-UT-704/705 K. Montgomery II 3/7/07 45 0 S IRS 01-92-01 GE-UT-705 K. Montgomery II 3/7/07 60'S IRS 01-92-01 GE-UT-705 K. Montgomery II 3/7/07 Comments: Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code Section XI, 1989 Edition no Addenda, also Section XI, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PDI program description and the Federal Register, Part II, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 50 for Category B-D Reactor Pressure Vessel IRPV) Assembly Welds.Automated transverse and parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedures GE-UT-704 V8 and GE-UT-705 V5, using 450 Shear wave, 60' RL, and 70' RL search units, supplemental 00 L-Wave scans were also performed.
Nozzle Inner 15%T circ scans were performed in accordance with Model validated search unit angles.Automated scanning was performed from the vessel OD surface. and was restricted due to the nozzle configuration.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system 0 reference is located at 900 CW of nozzle TDC.One acceptable indication was recorded.Automated Composite Coverage = 70.5%The examination results were compared with data report D-459 from L2R03 outage with [D No Change These examinations were performed under Work Order: N/A [- Change This summary and the following data sheets have been reviewed and accepted by the following personnel:
1 7 Prepared By: Level Date:
utility Reew By: Date: ANII Reviewed By: Date: Page 1 of / 0 Cn C 0 (0 Reactor Pressure Vessel GE Energy- Nuclear Coverage Calculation Sheet LaSalle Unit-2, 2007 LCS-2-N2A L2R11 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Weld Length = 360. Required Exam Percent Exam Volume = 59.1 Area Sq. In. Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent 600 T-Scan (S4 UC) A* 8.5 8.5 14.4% 360 7.2%450 T-Scan (S6 FV) A* 39.2 33.5 56.7% 360 28 3%700 T-Scan (36 NS) A* 11.4 5.8 9.8% 360 4.9%IRS P-Scan (S4 UC) A 8.5 8.5 14.4% 360 7.2%450 P-Scan (S6 FV) A 392 22.5 38.1% 360 19.0%70 0 P-Scan (S6 NS) A 11.4 4.5 7.6% 360 3.8%600 T-Scan (S4 UC)450 T-Scan (S6 FV)700 T-Scan (S6 NS) ___________
________ _______ ________ _______IRS P-Scan (S4 UC)450 P-Scan (S6 FV)70' P-Scan (S6 NS)60' T-Scan (S4 UC)450 T-Scan (S6 FV)700 T-Scan (S6 NS)IRS P-Scan (S4 UC)450 P-Scan (S6 FV)70&deg; P-Scan (S6 NS)% Total Composite Coverage = 70.5%% oa Ceo.e0oea2Rev5 Comments: Scanning limited due to the nozzle configuration.
IRS P-Scan by modeling.A* -Single side access, 100% credit of the achieved Supplement 4 T-scan volume claimed iaw. 1OCFR50.55a..
Note -Rounding methods may affect calculated values. UC-Underclad, FV-Full volume, NS-Near Surface. Weld length in degrees.
I-C,, C r\3 N)0 0-.4 (0 CD/F-LaSalle Unit-2 LCS-2-N2A 70&deg; Exam Volume = 11.4 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume = 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 607T) = 8.5 Sq. In.70' T-Scan achieved = 5.8 Sq. In.450 T-Scan achieved
= 33.5 Sq. In.600 T-Scan achieved = 8.5 Sq. In.17.25" 707T I 45&deg;T I 60'T I-----1 C/)0 0)N)/LaSalle Unit-2 LCS-2-N2A 700 Exam Volume = 11.4 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume = 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 60 0 T) = 8.5 Sq. In.700 P-Scan achieved = 4.5 Sq. In.450 P-Scan achieved = 22.5 Sq. In.IRS P-Scan achieved = 8.5 Sq. In. (By model)17.25" 70'P 45&deg;P K-----A k- -- --CD
-GE EnergyNuclear Examination Summary Sheet Site: LaSalle Unit-2 Component ID: LCS-2-N2D Outage: L2R11 Configuration:
Nozzle to Shell System: RPV ASME Cat: B-D ASME Item: B3.90 Aug. Requirements:
N/A Exams Calibration Calibration Examination NDE Performed:
Sheetls):
Block: Procedure:
Personnel:
Level: Date: 0 0 L NOZ 01-92-01 GE-UT-704/705 C. Gauthier II 3/6/07 45&deg;S NOZ 01-92-01 GE-UT-704/705 C. Gauthier II 3/6/07 60 0 L NOZ 01-92-01 GE-UT-704/705 C. Gauthier II 3/6/07 70 0 L NOZ 01-92-01 GE-UT-704/705 C. Gauthier II 3/6/07 4505 IRS 01-92-01 GE-UT-705 C. Gauthier tl 3/7/07 60&deg;S IRS 01-92-01 GE-UT-705 C. Gauthier II 3/7/07 Comments: Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code Section XI, 1989 Edition noAddenda, also Section X1, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PDI program description and the Federal Register, Part II, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 50 for Category 8-D Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) Assembly Welds.Automated transverse and parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedures GE-UT-704 V8 and GE-UT-705 VS, using 450 Shear wave, 600 RL, and 700 RL search units, supplemental 0&deg; L-Wove scans were also performed.
Nozzle Inner 15%T circ scans were performed in accordance with Model validated search unit angles.Automated scanning was performed from the vessel OD surface. and was restricted due to the nozzle configuration and proximity of the N9A nozzle.The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system 0 reference is located at 900 CW of nozzle TDC, No relevant indications were recorded.Automated Composite Coverage = 70.3%The examination results were compared with data report D-463 from L2R03 outage with [ No Change These examinations were performed Linder Work Order: N/A D Change This summary and the following data sheets have been reviewed and accepted by the following personnel:
__ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ t 3'0 __ ___ ___ ___
__ ____Prepaied ,y: Levelt Date: Utiity Review By: Date: ANII Reviewed 1y: Date: Page I of Ul)C Reactor Pressure Vessel GE Energy -Nuclear Coverage Calculation Sheet LaSalle Unit-2, 2007 LCS-2-N2D L2R11 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Weld Length = 360. Required Exam Percent Exam Volume = 69.1 Area Sq. In. Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent 600 T-Scan (S4 UC) A* 8.5 8.5 14.4% 315 6.3%450 T-Scan (S6 FV) A* 39.2 33.5 56.7% 360 28.3%70' T-Scan (S6 NS) A* 11.4 5.8 9.8% 360 4.9%IRS P-Scan (S4 UC) A 8.5 8.5 14.4% 360 7.2%450 P-Scan (S6 FV) A 39.2 22.5 38.1% 360 19.0%70' P-Scan (S6 NS) A 11.4 4.5 7.6% 360 3.8%600 T-Scan (S4 UC) B 8.5 6.8 11.5% 45 0.7%450 T-Scan (S6 FV)700 T-Scan (S6 NS)IRS P-Scan (S4 UC) '_450 P-Scan (S6 FV)70' P-Scan (S6 NS)60' T-Scan (S4 UC)450 T-Scan (S6 FV)700 T-Scan (S6 NS)IRS P-Scan (S4 UC)450 P-Scan (S6 FV)70&deg; P-Scan (S6 NS)% Total Composite Coverage =70.3%.&#xfd; gj--Comments: Scanning limited due to the nozzle configuration and proximity of the N9A nozzle.IRS P-Scan by modeling.A* -Single side access, 100% credit of the achieved Supplement 4 T-scan volume claimed iaw. 10CFR50.55a..
Note -Rounding methods may affect calculated values. UC-Underclad, FV-Full volume, NS-Near Surface. Weld length in degrees.
C/)CD C:/K----LaSalle Unit-2 LCS-2-N2D 700 Exam Volume 450 Exam Volume Inner 15%T Exam= 11.4 Sq. In.= 39.2 Sq. In.Volume (IRS & 60 0 T) = 8.5 Sq. In.700 P-Scan achieved = 4.5 Sq. In.450 P-Scan achieved = 22.5 Sq. In.IRS P-Scan achieved = 8.5 Sq. In. (By model)17.25" 70TP 45&deg;P I IF- ---9 C, C 0 0 I LaSalle Unit-2 LCS-2-N2D 700 Exam Volume = 11.4 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume = 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 60'T) = 8.5 Sq. In.700 T-Scan achieved = 5.8 Sq. In.450 T-Scan achieved = 33.5 Sq. In.600 T-Scan achieved = 8.5 Sq. In.17.25" 70'T 45'T I 60'T/I r-0)C 0./V-LaSalle Unit-2 LCS-2-N2D 700 Exam Volume = 11.4 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume = 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 607T) = 8.5 Sq. In.700 T-Scan achieved = 5.8 Sq. In.450 T-Scan achieved = 33.5 Sq. In.600 T-Scan achieved = 6.8 Sq. In.17.25" Limited area due to N9.45&deg;T 60&deg;T I I 70'T a GE EnergyNuclear Examination Summary Sheet Report No.: 2R11-010 Site: LaSalle Unit-2 Component ID: LCS-2-N2E Outage: L2R11 Configuration:
Nozzle to Shell System: RPV ASME Cat: B-D ASME Item: B3.90 Aug. Requirements:
N/A Exams Calibration Calibration Examination NDE Performed:
Sheetls):
Block: Procedure:
Personnel:
Level: Date: 0&deg;L NOZ 01-92-01 GE-UT-704/705 K. Montgomery 11 3/7/07 45&deg;S NOZ 01-92-01 GE-UT-704/705 K. Montgomery 11 3/7/07 60 0 L NOZ 01-92-01 GE-UT-704/705 K. Montgomery 11 3/7/07 70 0 L NOZ 01-92-01 GE-UT-704/705 K. Montgomery 11 3/7/07 450S IRS 01-92-01 GE-UT-705 K.
Montgomery 11 3/7/07 60'S IRS 01-92-01 GE-UT-705 K. Montgomery 11 3/7/07 Comments: Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code Section XI, 1989 Edition no Addenda, also Section XI, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PDI program description and the Federal Register, Part II, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 50 for Category B-D Reactor Pressure Vessel IRPV) Assembly Welds.Automated transverse and parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedures GE-UT-704 V8 and GE-UT-705 V5, using 450 Shear wave, 600 RL, and 700 RL search units, supplemental 00 L-Wave scans were also performed.
Nozzle Inner 15%T circ scans were performed in accordance with Model validated search unit angles.Automated scanning was performed from the vessel OD surface. and was restricted due to the nozzle configuration.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system 0 reference is located at 900 CW of nozzle TDC.No relevant indications were recorded.
Automated Composite Coverage = 70.5%The examination results were compared with data report D-463 from L2R03 outage with [ No Change These examinations were performed under Work Order: N/A [] Change This summary and the following data sheets have been reviewed and accepted by the following personnel:
Prepared By: evel: Dote: Utility Review By: Cote: ANII Reviewed By: qrp1te Page 1 of at3 I-.Ul)(D C C)0 0-Reactor Pressure Vessel GE Energy -Nuclear Coverage Calculation Sheet LaSalle Unit-2, 2007 LCS-2-N2E L2R1 1 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Weld Length = 360. Required Exam Percent Exam Volume = 59.1 Area Sq. In. Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent 60' T-Scan (S4 UC) A* 8.5 8.5 14.4% 315 6.3%450 T-Scan (S6 FV) A* 39.2 33.5 56.7% 360 28.3%709 T-Scan (S6 NS) A* 11.4 5.8 9.8% 360 4.9%IRS P-Scan (S4 UC) A 8.5 8.5 14.4% 360 7.2%450 P-Scan (S6 FV) A 39.2 22.5 38.1% 360 19.0%700 P-Scan (S6 NS) A 11.4 4.5 7.6% 360 3.8%60' T-Scan (S4 UC)450 T-Scan (S6 FV)70' T-Scan (S6 NS)IRS P-Scan (S4 UC)450 P-Scan (S6 FV)700 P-Scan (S6 NS), 60' T-Scan (S4 UC)45' T-Scan (S6 FV)70' T-Scan (S6 NS)IRS P-Scan (S4 UC)45' P-Scan (S6 FV)70' P-Scan (S6 NS)% Total Composite Coverage = 69.6%Re. 0 9/23/05 Comments: Scanning limited due to the nozzle configuration.
IRS P-Scan by modeling.A* -Single side access, 100% credit of the achieved Supplement 4 T-scan volume claimed iaw. 10CFR50.55a..
Note -Rounding methods may affect calculated values. UC-Underclad, FV-Full volume, NS-Near Surface. Weld length in degrees.
C: 2.C~4//LaSalle Unit-2 LCS-2-N2E 70' Exam Volume = 11.4 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume = 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 60'T) = 8.5 Sq. In.700 T-Scan achieved
= 5.8 Sq. In.450 T-Scan achieved = 33.5 Sq. In.600 T-Scan achieved
= 8.5 Sq. In.17.25" 70'T I 45&deg;T I 60'T----A C/)CD N)C0 0 4./K----1~LaSalle Unit-2 LCS-2-N2E 700 Exam Volume = 11A4 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume = 39,2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 600T) = 8.5 Sq. In.700 P-Scan achieved = 4.5 Sq. In.450 P-Scan achieved = 22.5 Sq. In.IRS P-Scan achieved = 8.5 Sq. In. (By model)17.25" 70'P 45*P I I K---- ----A L (&#xa3; I I I GE Energy Nuclear Examination Summary Sheet ReportNo.:
2R11-011 Site: LaSalle Unit-2 Component ID: LCS-2-N5A Outage: L2R11 Configuration:
Nozzle to Shell System: RPV ASME Cat: B-D ASME Item: B3.90 Aug. Requirements:
N/A Exams Calibration Calibration Examination NDE Performed:
Sheet(s):
Block: Procedure:
Personnel:
Level: Date: 0&deg;L NOZ 01-92-01 GE-UT-704/705 K. Montgomery 11 3/4/07 45&deg;S NOZ 01-92-01 GE-UT-704/705 K. Montgomery 11 3/4/07 60'L NOZ 01-92-01 GE-UT-704/705 K. Montgomery 11 3/4/07 70 0 L NOZ 01-92-01 GE-UT-704/705 K. Montgomery 11 3/4/07 450S IRS 01-92-01 GE-UT-705 K. Montgomery 11 3/4/07 60'S IRS 01-92-01 GE-UT-705 K. Montgomery 11 3/4/07 Comments: Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code Section XI, 1989 Edition no Addenda, also Section XI, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PDI program description and the Federal Register, Part II, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 50 for Category B-D Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) Assembly Welds.Automated transverse and parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedures GE-UT-704 V8 and GE-UT-705 V5, using 450 Shear wave, 60&deg; RL, and 70' RL search units, supplemental 00 L-Wave scans were also performed.
Nozzle Inner 15%T circ scans were performed in accordance with Model validated search unit angles.Automated scanning was performed from the vessel OD surface. and was restricted due to the nozzle configuration.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system 0 reference is located at 900 CW of nozzle TDC.No relevant indications were recorded.Automated Composite Coverage = 70.5%The examination results were compared with data report D-434 from L2R03 outage with [ No Change These examinations were performed under Work Order: N/A [l Change This summary and the following data sheets have been reviewed and accepted by the following personnel:
Pvepaced By: Level: Date Utility Review gy: Dote: ANII Reviewed Ey: Date: Page "I of U/)C:3 C)0 Reactor Pressure Vessel GE Energy -Nuclear Coverage Calculation Sheet LaSalle Unit-2, 2007 LCS-2-N5A L2R11 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Weld Length = 360. Required Exam Area Scanned Percent Exam Volume = 59.1 Area Sq. In. Manual of Area Weld Length Percent 600 T-Scan (S4 UC) A* 8.5 8.5 14.4% 360 7.2%450 T-Scan (S6 FV) A* 39.2 33.5 56.7% 360 28.3%700 T-Scan (S6 NS) A* 11.4 5.8 9.8% 360 4.9%IRS P-Scan (S4 UC) A 8.5 8.5 14.4% 360 7.2%450 P-Scan (S6 FV) A 39.2 22.5 38.1% 360 19.0%700 P-Scan (S6 NS) A 11.4 4.5 7.6% 360 3.8%600 T-Scan (S4 UC)450 T-Scan (S6 FV)700 T-Scan (S6 NS)IRS P-Scan (S4 UC)450 P-Scan (S6 FV)70' P-Scan (S6 NS)600 T-Scan (S4 UC)450 T-Scan (S6 FV)700 T-Scan (S6 NS)IRS P-Scan (S4 UC)450 P-Scan (S6 FV)700 P-Scan (36 NS)CD 0% Total Composite Coverage =70.5%Rev. 0 9/23105 Comments: Scanning limited due to the nozzle configuration.
IRS P-Scan by modeling.A* -Single side access, 100% credit of the achieved Supplement 4 T-scan volume claimed law. 1 OCFR50.55a..
Note -Rounding methods may affect calculated values. UC-Underclad, FV-Full volume, NS-Near Surface. Weld length in degrees.
r--C,,)C N)4/LaSalle Unit-2 LCS-2-N5A 70' Exam Volume = 11.4 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume = 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 60 0 T) = 8.5 Sq. In.700 T-Scan achieved = 5.8 Sq. In.450 T-Scan achieved = 33.5 Sq. In.600 T-Scan achieved
= 8.5 Sq. In.17.25" 70'T 45&deg;T I 60'T----1 CD 0
\I LaSalle Unit-2 LCS-2-N5A 700 Exam Volume = 11.4 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume = 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 60 0 T) = 8.5 Sq. In.700 P-Scan achieved = 4.5 Sq. In.450 P-Scan achieved = 22.5 Sq. In.IRS P-Scan achieved = 8.5 Sq. In. (By model)17.25" 70&deg;P 45 P (OGE Enery Nuclear Examination Summary Sheet Report No.: 2R11-012 Site: LaSalle Unit-2 Component ID: LCS-2-N6B Outage: L2R11 Configuration:
Nozzle to Shell System: RPV ASME Cat: B-D ASME Item: B3.90 Aug. Requirements:
N/A Exams Calibration Calibration Examination NDE Performed:
Sheetls):
Block: Procedure:
Personnel:
Level: Date: 0&deg;L NOZ 01-92-01 GE-UT-704/705 K. Montgomery II 3/5/07 450S NOZ 01-92-01 GE-UT-704/705 K. Montgomery II 3/5/07 60 0 L NOZ 01-92-01 GE-UT-704/705 K. Montgomery II 3/5/07 70 0 L NOZ 01-92-01 GE-UT-704/705 K. Montgomery II 3/5/07 450S IRS 01-92-01 GE-UT-705 C. Gauthier II 3/5/07 60&deg;S IRS 01-92-01 GE-UT-705 C. Gauthier II 3/5/07 Comments: Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code Section Xl, 1989 Edition no Addenda, also Section XI, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PDI program description and the Federal.Register, Part II, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 50 for Category B-D Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) Assembly Welds.Automated transverse and parallel scans were performed in accordance with procedures GE-UT-704 V8 and GE-UT-705 V5, using 450 Shear wave, 600 RL, and 700 RL search units, supplemental 00 L-Wave scans were also performed.
Nozzle Inner 15%T circ scans were performed in accordance with Model validated search unit angles.Automated scanning was performed from the vessel OD surface. and was restricted due to the nozzle configuration.
The GERIS 2000 OD automated UT system 0 reference is located at 900 CW of nozzle TDC.Note-The N6B is located at 3150 Az.No relevant indications were recorded.Automated Composite Coverage = 70.5%The examination results were compared with data report D-453 from L2R03 outage with [] No Change These examinations were performed under Work Order:
N/A E]Change This summary and the following data sheets have been reviewed and accepted by the following personnel:
Piepared By: Level: Dote: Utility Revcew By: Dote: i',Nil Reviewed By: Dote: Poge 1 of <7 U-C: Reactor Pressure Vessel GE Energy- Nuclear Coverage Calculation Sheet LaSalle Unit-2, 2007 LCS-2-N6B L2R11 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Weld Length = 360. Required Exam Percent Exam Volume = 59.1 Area Sq. In. Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent 60' T-Scan (34 UC) A* 8.5 8.5 14.4% 360 7.2%450 T-Scan (S6 FV) A* 39.2 33.5 56.7% 360 28.3%70' T-Scan (S6 NS) A* 11.4 5.8 9.8% 360 4.9%IRS P-Scan (S4 UC) A 8.5 8.5 14.4% 360 7.2%450 P-Scan (S6 FV) A 39.2 22.5 38.1% 360 19.0%700 P-Scan (S6 NS) A 11.4 4.5 7.6% 360 3.8%600 T-Scan (S4 UC)450 T-Scan (S6 FV)700 T-Scan (S6 NS)IRS P-Scan (S4 UC)450 P-Scan (S6 FV)700 P-Scan (S6 NS)600 T-Scan (S4 UC)450 T-Scan (S6 FV)700 T-Scan (S6 NS)IRS P-Scan (S4 UC)450 P-Scan (S6 FV)700 P-Scan (S6 NS)fl (D 0% Total Composite Coverage =70.5%Comments: Scanning limited due to the nozzle configuration.
IRS P-Scan by modeling.A*- Single side access, 100% credit of the achieved Supplement 4 T-scan volume claimed iaw. 1OCFR50.55a.
Note -Rounding methods may affect calculated values. UC-Underclad, FV-Full volume, NS-Near Surface. Weld length in degrees.
Cf)CD D-.0 I F----LaSalle Unit-2 LCS-2-N6B 700 Exam Volume = 11.4 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume
= 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 607T) = 8.5 Sq. In.700 T-Scan achieved = 5.8 Sq. In.450 T-Scan achieved = 33.5 Sq. In.600 T-Scan achieved = 8.5 Sq. In.17.25" 70&deg;T 457T I 60'T I----A C C/)C I LaSalle Unit-2 LCS-2-N6B 700 Exam Volume = 11.4 Sq. In.450 Exam Volume = 39.2 Sq. In.Inner 15%T Exam Volume (IRS & 607T) = 8.5 Sq. In.700 P-Scan achieved = 4.5 Sq. In.450 P-Scan achieved = 22.5 Sq. In.IRS P-Scan achieved = 8.5 Sq. In. (By model)17.25" K----70-p 45-P CD 0 cft*
Ou Site: LaSalle Component ID: LCS-2-N9A itoge: L2R11 N-S%Aug Req System: RPV ASME Cot.: B-D ASME Item 83.90 SECT XI Exams Data Sheet Cal Sheet Procedure Calibration Block Examination Cert Level Date Performed Personnel 60&deg; Shear D-076 N/A GE-UT-311 Ver/Rev 15 01-92-01 Phillip Hopkins II 1 3/6/2007 600 RL i D-074 N/A GE-UT-300 Ver/Rev 10 01-92-01 Wallace Reid Ii 3/6/2007 600 RL D-075 N/A i GE-UT-300 Ver/Rev 10 CAL-IIW2-017 Wallace Reid II 3/6/2007 Examination Results: Ultrasonic examination results were acceptableto the requirements of ASME B&PV Code Section X1, 1989 Edition no. Addenda, and Section X1, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PDI program description and the Federal Register, Part II. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 50 of Category B-D Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) Assembly Welds.Manual transverse and parallel scans were performed from the vessel OD surface in accordance with procedure GE-UT-300 V10, using 600 RL search units. Manual parallel scans of the inner 15%T volume were performed in accordance with procedure GE-UT-311 V15 using model validated shear wave search units.Manual scanning was restricted due to the nozzle configuration.
The manual exams recorded no indications.
Manual UT composite coverage = 82.9%(Examination results were compared to data report 95-472 from 3/31/1995 outage with V-1 No Change These examinations were performed under Work Order:. Change This Summary and the following data sheets have been reviewed and accepted by the following personnel:
C&#xfd; ' 6eCAO4 &#xfd;' Dose: 164 mr.Prepared By: Date: Utility Review: Date: ANII Review. Date: Page I of 7 rI-C/9i (D 0 C Reactor Pressure Vessel GE Energy -Nuclear Coverage Calculation Sheet LaSalle Unit-2, 2007 LCS-2-N9A L2R11 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Weld Length = 360. Required Exam Percent Exam Volume = 59.6 Area Sq. In. Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent 600 T-Scan (S4) A 8.5 8.5 14.3% 360 7.1%600 T-Scan (S6)
A 51.1 38.1 63.9% 360 32.0%IRS P-Scan (S4) A* 8.5 8.5 14.3% 360 7.1%60' P-Scan (S6) A 51.1 43.7 73.3% 360 36.7%600 T-Scan (S4)600 T-Scan (S6)IRS P-Scan (S4)60' P-Scan (S6)600 T-Scan (S4)600 T-Scan (S6)IRS P-Scan (S4)60' P-Scan (S6)600 T-Scan (S4)60' T-Scan (S6)IRS P-Scan (S4)600 P-Scan (S6)0D 01% Total Composite Coverage =82.9%1, 1 Re,, 0 i91Vfl0 Rev 0 9/23/05 v Comments: A* -Single side access, 100% credit of the achieved Supplement 4 T-scan volume claimed iaw. 1 OCFR50.55a.
Note -Rounding methods may affect calculated values. Weld length in degrees.
_ LaSalle Unit-2=LCS-2-N9A 0'o 60' S4 Exam Volume = 8.5 Sq. In.4 600 S6 Exam Volume = 51.1 Sq. In.600 S4 Inner 15%T IRS-Scan achie 600 S6 P-Scan achieved = 38.1 Sq.600 S4 T-Scan achieved = 8.5 Sq. 1 600 S6 T-Scan achieved = 43.7 Sq./0.0", 9.2" 0 T CD ved = 8.5 Sq. In.In.n.In.15.6" 607T I (Report No.: EXAMINATION
 
==SUMMARY==
SHEET 2R11-014 GE ENERGY, NUCLEAR Site: LaSalle Component ID: LCS-2-N9B Outage: L2R11 N-SH System: RPV ASME Cat.: B-D ASME Item B3. 90 Aug Req SECT XI Exams Data Sheet Cal Sheet Procedure Calibration Black Examination Cert Level Date Performed I Personnel i 60 " Ser 01-92-01 WlaeRidU 372d"0 She D-083 N/A GE-UT-311 Ver/Rev 15 -G "31 Wallace Reid '30/2007 600 RL D-077 N/A GE-UT-300 Ver/Rev 10 CAL-11W2-017 Wallace Reid iI i 3/7/2007 60&deg; RL i D-078 I N/A- i GE-UT-300 Ver/Rev i0 01-92-01 I Wallace Reid II 3/7/2007 Examination Results: Ultrasonic examination results were acceptable to the requirements of ASME B&PV Code Section XI, 1989 Edition no. Addenda, and Section XI, 1995 Edition with the 1996 Addenda as modified by the PDI program description and the Federal Register, Part II. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 50 of Category B-D Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) Assembly Welds.Manual transverse and parallel scans were performed from the vessel OD surface in accordance with procedure GE-UT-300 VI1, using 60&deg; RL search units. Manual parallel scans of the inner 15%T volume were performed in accordance with procedure GE-UT-311 V15 using model validated shear wave search units. Reference nozzle inner radius and bore inspection requirement sheet included in report 2R11-025.Manual scanning was restricted due to the nozzle configuration.
The manual exams recorded no indications.
Manual UT composite coverage = 82.9%Examination results were compared to data report 95-474 from 3/31/1995 outage with ' No Change These examinations were performed under Work Order: Change This Summary and the following data sheets have been reviewed and accepted by the following personnel:
RW'7 6/,' /)y/[L.(~
?..L ..;.7 Dose: 145 mr.Prepared By: Date: Utility Review. Date: ANII Review Date: Page 1 of 6 C/)C:)Reactor Pressure Vessel GE Energy- Nuclear Coverage Calculation Sheet LaSalle Unit-2, 2007 LCS-2-N9B" L2R11 CODE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA TOTAL CODE COVERAGE Weld Length = 360. Required Exam Percent Exam Volume = 59.6 Area Sq. In. Area Scanned of Area Weld Length Percent 600 T-Scan (S4)
A 8.5 8.5 14.3% 360 7.1%60&deg; T-Scan (S6) A 51.1 38.1 63.9% 360 32.0%IRS P-Scan (S4) A* 8.5 8.5 14.3% 360 7.1%60' P-Scan (S6) A 51.1 43.7 73.3% 360 36.7%600 T-Scan (S4)600 T-Scan (S6).IRS P-Scan (S4)60' P-Scan (S6)60' T-Scan (S4)600 T-Scan (S6)IRS P-Scan (S4)60' P-Scan (S6)60' T-Scan (S4) _600 T-Scan (S6)IRS P-Scan (S4)600 P-Scan (S6)% Total Composite Coverage = 82.9%-j A-t,& Rev. o 9/23105 Comments: A* -Single side access, 100% credit of the achieved Supplement 4 T-scan volume claimed iaw. 1OCFR50.55a.
Note -Rounding methods may affect calculated values. Weld length in degrees.(0 i--LaSalle Unit-2 CLCS-2-N9B C),) 600 S4 Exam Volume = 8.5 Sq. In.-,4 600 S6 Exam Volume = 51.1 Sq. In.600 S4 Inner 15%T IRS-Scan achie\600 S6 P-Scan achieved = 38.1 Sq.S4 T-Scan achieved = 8.5 Sq. Ir 600 S6 T-Scan achieved = 43.7 Sq.0.0"9.2"1 60&deg;P CD 0> r o, C'\,ed = 8.5 Sq. In.In.In.15.6" 60'T I}}

Latest revision as of 06:59, 17 April 2019

Redirect to:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML083260525&oldid=1471622"