ML12128A479: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
#REDIRECT [[DCL-12-041, 2011 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report. Part 1 of 5]]
| number = ML12128A479
| issue date = 04/16/2012
| title = 2011 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report. Part 1 of 5
| author name = Wright M B
| author affiliation = Pacific Gas & Electric Co
| addressee name =
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR
| docket = 05000275, 05000323
| license number =
| contact person =
| case reference number = DCL-12-041
| document type = Periodic Monitoring Report (Radiological/Environmental)
| page count = 99
}}
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:w Enclosure PG&E Letter DCL-12-041 2011 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT i 0 0 0 0*0 0 0 0 2011 Annual Radiological 0 Environmental Operating Report 0 0 Diablo Canyon Power Plant 0 0 January 1, 2011 -December 31, 2011 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2011 Diablo Canyon Power Plant ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT (AREOR)January 1, 2011 -December 31, 2011 Prepared By Pacific Gas & Electric Company Diablo Canyon Power Plant Prepared by: Date: //Martin B. Wright, DCPP RP Senior Engineer Reviewed & Approved by: R' Date: / //7/i.2 Tim Irving, DCPP Radiation P tection Manager 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PG&E Submittal Letter DCL- 12-041 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* EXECUTIVE
 
==SUMMARY==
S*During the year 2011, a Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) was conducted for the Diablo Canyon Power Plant (DCPP) to assess the levels of radiation or radioactivity in the environment.
*More than 1400 samples were collected (including TLDs) over the course of the monitoring period, with 0approximately 2300 radionuclide or exposure rate analyses performed.
This report contains results from the operational Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program S (REMP) for Diablo Canyon Power Plant (DCPP) compiled for the period January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011. This program was conducted in accordance with DCPP Program Directive CY2,"Radiological Monitoring and Controls Program," and RP 1.ID 11, "Environmental Radiological Monitoring Procedure." The types of samples (matrix ID) collected for this monitoring period were as follows: Air Particulate (AP) Air Cartridges (AC) for iodide monitoring, Direct Radiation (TLD's) Milk (MK) Meat (MT) Vegetation (VG)0 Drinking Water (DW) Ground Water (GW) Surface Water (SW) Aquatic Vegetation (AV)Fish (FH) Mussels (IM) Sediment (SD) Rain (ML)S 0 Diablo Canyon REMP collected environmental samples and shipped them to General Engineering Labs (GEL) located in Charleston, South Carolina.
All 2011 REMP environmental lab sample analyses were performed by GEL.0 The ambient direct radiation levels in the DCPP offsite environs did not change and were within the preoperational range. Beginning in June 2009, DCPP began loading of the onsite Independent Spent Fuel S Storage Installation (ISFSI). The ISFSI had no significant impact on the REMP TLD station readings in the vicinity of the site boundary and beyond. The ambient direct radiation levels within the DCPP plant site boundary near the ISFSI were elevated due to dry cask used fuel storage. An evaluation of direct radiation measurements and member of public occupancy times surrounding the ISFSI indicated all federal criteria for member of public dose limits were conservatively met.S S S S S S S 0 0 0 Groundwater monitoring data was collected in accordance with the nuclear industry NEI 07-07 Groundwater Protection Initiative (August 2007). Concentrations of tritium were detected in three monitoring wells beneath the DCPP power block (OWl, OW2, and DY 1). This tritium was attributed to rain-washout of gaseous tritium exiting the plant vent system (via an approved discharge path). It should be noted that studies of the DCPP site indicated that any groundwater (subsurface) flow beneath the DCPP power block was not used as a source of drinking water. Due to topography and site characteristics, this subsurface flow discharged into the Pacific Ocean which is approximately 100 yards from the power block.An Old Steam Generator Storage Facility (OSGSF) long term storage mausoleum was constructed within the DCPP site boundary in 2007 for storage of eight retired DCPP steam generators and two retired DCPP reactor heads. This equipment was placed into this OSGSF on the following dates:* March 2008 (outage 2R14), four DCPP Unit Two (U-2) Steam Generators
* February 2009 (outage 1R15), four DCPP Unit One (U-i) Steam Generators
* November 2009 (outage 2R15), one DCPP Unit Two (U-2) Reactor (Rx) Head" October 2010 (outage 1R16), one DCPP Unit One (U-i) Rx Head This OSGSF did not cause any changes to the ambient direct radiation levels within the DCPP environs during 2011.0 The OSGSF sumps were inspected quarterly by REMP personnel.
Rainwater in-leakage was found within the OSGSF sumps during the first quarter of 2011. This rainwater had tritium concentrations of 2,000 to 34,000 pCi/Liter due to diffusion of tritium from the stored equipment into the sump rainwater.
The rainwater from the sump was removed and processed via an approved radwaste discharge pathway.Subsequent construction repairs to the OSGSF have prevented rainwater from entering the OSGSF throughout the remainder of 2011. These sumps have remained dry.0 The results of the 2011 REMP showed no unusual findings from DCPP site operations.
These results were also compared to preoperational data and showed no unusual trends.0 On March 1 1th, 2011 the Tohoku earthquake (magnitude 9.0 Mw) and tsunami struck the east coast of Japan. The tsunami associated with this event caused nuclear accidents at the Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Station in Fukushima Prefecture, Japan. Isotopic releases occurred in Japan and were carried by the jet stream to the west coast of the United States. The DCPP REMP initiated numerous supplemental sampling to establish Fukushima contributions to DCPP isotopic background concentrations.
These 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0* Fukushima isotopes were eventually detected by the DCPP REMP beginning on March 1 7 th, 2011. The* primary isotopes detected by the DCPP REMP were 1-13 1, 1-132, Te-132, Cs-134, and Cs-137. Airborne O concentrations were detected from March 1 7 th thru April 2 0 th. The DCPP REMIP continued to detect 0 cesium within milk, vegetation, and meat throughout the end of 2011. Additional discussion on* Fukushima isotopes is found within Section 4.5 of this report.0 0 Diablo Canyon site operations had no significant radiological impact on airborne, surface water, drinking 0 water, marine life, aquatic vegetation, terrestrial vegetation, milk, or meat radioactivity in the 0 environment.
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page Intentionally Blank 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0*t TABLE OF CONTENTS 0t Executive Summary* 1.0 Introduction 0t 2.0 Program Design 2.1 Monitoring Zones 2.2 Pathways Monitored*t 2.3 Descriptions of REMP Monitoring
 
====2.3.1 Direct====
Radiation 2.3.2 Airborne Radioactivity
* 2.3.3 Waterborne
 
====2.3.4 Marine====
Biological, Beach Sand, and Ocean Sediment* 2.3.5 Food Crops* 2.3.6 Milk 2.3.7 Meat*t 3.0 Radiological Data Summary of Tables*t 4.0 Analysis of Environmental Results*t 4.1 REMP Sampling Variance / Deviations
 
===4.2 Comparison===
 
of Achieved LLDs with Requirements
 
===4.3 Comparison===
 
of Results Against Reporting LeVels*t 4.4 Data Analysis by Media Type* 4.4.1 Direct Radiation 4.4.2 Airborne Radioactivity
* 4.4.3 Waterborne
 
====4.4.4 Marine====
Biological, Beach Sand, and Ocean Sediment 4.4.5 Food Crops* 4.4.6 Milk* 4.4.7 Meat 4.5 Supplemental sampling due to Fukushima Japan, Dai-Ichi NPS event*t 5.0 Groundwater Monitoring
* 6.0 Old Steam Generator Storage Facility* 7.0 Cross Check Program* 8.0 DCPP Annual Land Use Census 9.0 DCPP Wind Rose 10.0 References
* Appendix A REMP Summary Tables Appendix B Direct Radiation Results* Appendix C Individual Analytical Sample Results* Appendix D Supplemental Fukushima Event Analytical Sample Results St 0t St 0t St 0 0 0 LIST OF TABLES Table Title 1 DCPP Land Use Census 0 2.1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program 2.2 Distances and Directions to Environmental Monitoring Stations 0 2.3 Detection Capabilities for Environmental Lower Limit of Detection (LLD)2.4 Reporting Levels for Radioactivity Concentrations in Environmental Samples A-1 Direct Radiation Summary Table 0 A-2 REMP Airborne Summary Table A-2a Supplemental Fukushima Event Air Monitoring Summary Table A-3 Surface Water Summary Table 0 A-4 Drinking Water Summary Table A-5 Mussel Summary Table 0 A-6 Fish Summary Table 0 A-7 Algae Summary Table A-8 Kelp Summary Table 0 A-9 Vegetative Crops Summary Table A-9a Supplemental Fukushima Event Vegetation Monitoring Summary Table 0 A-10 Milk Summary Table 0 A-li Meat Summary Table0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S* A-12 Ocean Sediment Summary Table A-13 Beach Sand Summary Table 0 A-14 Groundwater Summary Table A- 15 Monitoring Well Summary Table A-16 Supplemental Fukushima Event Rain Monitoring Summary Table S A-17 Supplemental Fukushima Event Sticky Pad Summary Table 0 S*LIST OF FIGURES 0 Figure Title* 2.1 Diablo Canyon Off-site REMP Locations 0* 2.2 Diablo Canyon On-site REMP Locations 2.3 Diablo Canyon REMP Stations 0*3DCPP Land Use Census Map S S S S S S S S S S o S S S S S S S S S 0 S S S S S 0 0 0 0 S Page Intentionally Blank 5 S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S 0 0*
 
==1.0 INTRODUCTION==
 
Diablo Canyon Power Plant (DCPP) consists of two Westinghouse pressurized water reactors.* Unit 1 began commercial operation in 1985, and Unit 2 began commercial operation in 1986.S* Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) samples were collected by DCPP REMP personnel and sent to General Engineering Labs in Charleston, South Carolina for analysis.
Fish (except market fish) and ocean sediment samples were collected by contract divers of Tenera Environmental and given to DCPP REMP personnel for shipment to GEL. Market fish samples were collected by local commercial fishermen and then purchased by DCPP REMP personnel in one of two local fish markets for* shipment to GEL. Direct radiation analyses were conducted by DCPP REMP personnel and analyzed by the* DCPP Thermoluminescent Dosimeter (TLD) Lab.* DCPP sent replicate samples of milk (5F2), drinking water (DWI), outfall water (OUT), Diablo* Creek (5S2), vegetative crops (7G1), fish (DCM), sediment (DCM), and kelp (DCM) to the California
* Department of Public Health (CDPH) Radiological Health Branch as part of a State cross check program.* Other pathways monitored independently by the CDPH were direct radiation (TLDs) and air sampling.Additional split sampling was conducted post Fukushima Japan, Dai-Ichi NPS accident time frame.* This report summarizes the quarterly findings of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring
* Program (REMP) conducted by Diablo Canyon Power Plant. The remainder of this report is organized as* follows: S Section 2: Provides a description of the overall REMP design. Included is a summary of the requirements for REMP sampling and tables listing routine sampling and TLD* monitoring locations with- distances from the plant. Tables listing Lower Limit of Detection requirements and Reporting Levels (NRC notification if levels exceeded)are also included.S Section 3: Consists of the summarized data as required by the Radiological Environmental 5 Monitoring Program. The summaries are provided similar to that specified by the* NRC Branch Technical Position on Environmental Monitoring.
S Section 4: Provides a summary of the results for the samples collected.
The performance of the program in meeting the requirements is discussed, and the data acquired during the 5 monitoring period is analyzed.
Also included is environmental TLD.preoperational
* data trending.5* Section 5: Provides a summary of groundwater monitoring in accordance with the nuclear industry NEI 07-07 Groundwater Protection Initiative (August 2007).S 5 S o S 0 0 0 0 0 2.0 PROGRAM DESIGN The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) for the Diablo Canyon Power Plant (DCPP) was designed with the following specific objectives in mind. These objectives continue to be in force, to varying degrees, throughout facility operation." To provide an early indication of the appearance or accumulation of any radioactive material in the environment caused by facility operation.
Preoperational data is also used in this comparison.
0" To provide assurance to regulatory agencies and the public that the station's environmental impact is known and within anticipated limits.0* To provide standby monitoring capability for rapid assessment of risk to the general public in the event of unanticipated or accidental releases of radioactive material.0 The environmental media selected were based on the critical dose pathways of the radionuclides from the environment to man. They included the following:
direct radiation, air, water, fish, ocean sediment, and invertebrates.
Supplemental samples such as algae, kelp, local agricultural crops, recreational beach sand, groundwater, meat, and milk were also collected.
The sampling locations were determined by land use, site meteorology, and local demographics.
Guidance for this monitoring program is provided by the Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position on Radiological Environmental Monitoring, Revision 1, November 1979 The detailed sampling requirements of the RENT are given in Table 2.1 of this report. Summaries of REMP sampling for the period are shown in Appendix A of this report. Direct dose (environmental TLDs) results are shown in Appendix B of this report. The REMP sample isotopic results are shown in Appendix C of this report. Any deviations from the REMP sampling schedule / requirements are documented in section 4.0 of this report.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.1 MONITORING ZONES The REMP was designed to allow comparison of levels of radioactivity in samples from the areas possibly influenced by DCPP to levels found in areas not influenced by the facility operations.
Areas with the potential to be influenced by facility operations are called"indicator" stations.
Areas with sufficient distance from the plant that are not likely to be influenced by facility operations are called the "control" stations.
The distinction between the two zones is based on distance and relative direction from the plant. Analysis of survey data from the two zones aided in determination of site environmental influence.
It also helped in differentiation between radioactive releases and seasonal variations in the natural environmental background.
* 2.2 PATHWAYS MONITORED* Direct Radiation* Airborne Radioactivity
* Waterborne Pathways Marine Biological, Beach Sand, and Ocean Sediment* Food Crops Milk Meat
 
==2.3 DESCRIPTION==
S OF REMP MONITORING
 
====2.3.1 Direct====
Radiation Direct ambient radiation was measured at 31 stations in the vicinity of DCPP using* Panasonic UD814 TLD badges. The TLD badges had valid element correction
* factors (ECF), were calibrated using a NIST-traceable cesium-137 source, were annealed prior to placement, and were sealed in watertight packaging.
Three badges* were placed at each station each quarter. These badges were replaced on a quarterly* basis.* Direct ambient radiation was measured at 8 stations in the vicinity of the ISFSI* using Panasonic LTD814 TLD badges. The TLD badges had valid element correction factors (ECF), were calibrated using a NIST-traceable cesium- 137 0 source, were annealed prior to placement, and were sealed in watertight packaging.
Three badges were placed at each station each quarter. These badges were replaced on a quarterly basis.* The field TLD badge packets were prepared and processed by DCPP personnel and the DCPP TLD Lab. Control badges were carried with the field badges to measure 0 any dose received during transit. The location, date, and time of exchange were* recorded on a log sheet which accompanied the field badges. The net exposure was reported over a standard 90 day quarter.* DCPP Environmental TLD standard quarter results are measurements of all environmental gamma radiation sources (cosmic, terrestrial, radon, etc) at each* station during the deployment period. Transient and lab storage background dose* contributions were subtracted prior to reporting.
0 2.3.2 Airborne Radioactivity 0 Air particulate and radioiodine sampling were performed weekly at six indicator stations:
MT1, 0S2, 151, 7D1, 8S1 and 8S2. Air particulate and radioiodine sampling was performed weekly at one control station: 5F 1.Constant flow air samplers were used to draw air through paper filters to collect air particulates and through triethylenediamine (TEDA) impregnated charcoal cartridges to collect radioiodine.
The air samplers were set at a flow rate of 1.5 standard cubic feet per minute. The air samplers were located approximately one meter above the ground. The sample volumes were determined by F&J Corporation model DF- I flowmeters (corrected to standard temperature and pressure, STP) which were installed downstream of the sample head. At the end of the sampling period (weekly), the filter and cartridge were collected.
All necessary data regarding the air volume readings, flowrate, sampler time on / off, date of collection, and sampler location were recorded and submitted to GEL along with the samples for analysis.Approximately 72 hours after sampling (to allow for radon and thoron daughter decay), the filter papers collected from the field were placed on individual planchets and counted for gross beta activity in a low background, thin window gas proportional counter. Gamma isotopic analysis was then performed on quarterly composites of the filters (by station) to determine the activity concentration of gamma emitting isotopes.
The quarterly composite is reported at the midpoint of the quarter monitored.
The TEDA impregnated charcoal cartridges were counted for each weekly station sampling period for gamma isotopic analyses to determine the radioiodine concentration.
 
====2.3.3 Waterborne====
Water samples (drinking water, surface water, monitor wells, and groundwater) were collected at the frequencies shown in Table 2.1 Ocean surface water samples were collected at Diablo Cove (station DCM), Rattlesnake Canyon (station 7C2), and at the plant Outfall (station OUT).Drinking water samples were collected from Diablo Creek Weir (station 5S2), Diablo Creek Outlet (station WN2), Blanchard Spring (station 1 A2), and from the DCPP drinking water system (station DWl). Drinking water was also collected from a control station located in San Luis Obispo at the Offsite Emergency Lab (station OEL).Supplemental groundwater samples were collected from Water Well 02 (WW2)and DCSF96-1 (8S3).Supplemental onsite monitoring well samples were collected from Observation Well 01 (OWl), Observation Well 02 (OW2), and a french drain system labeled Drywell 115 (DY 1). These shallow wells were located in close proximity to the facility power block structures and within the protected area.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S After collection, the samples were securely sealed and labeled with sample type, station ID, date, time of collection, person performing the collection and sent to GEL for analysis.0 2.3.4 Marine Biological, Beach Sand, and Ocean Sediment*The REMP required sampling of rockfish (family Sebastes), perch (family Embiotocidae), mussels (family Mytilus), and ocean sediment from indicator*station DCM and control station 7C2. All other marine samples collected were considered supplemental.
These supplemental marine samples included the following:
intertidal algae, intertidal mussels, kelp, and market fish. The intertidal
*samples were collected by DCPP personnel during low tidal conditions.
Kelp was*collected quarterly by DCPP personnel from the offshore kelp bed in the vicinity of the plant. Quarterly samples of fish and an annual sample of ocean sediments were*collected from the plant environs by contracted divers (TENERA Environmental).
The Tenera divers fillet the fish and leave a small portion of skin for identification.
Beach sand was collected by DCPP personnel between the high and low tide boundaries at nearby recreational beaches. Fish caught locally by commercial
*fishermen were purchased from two local fish markets (Avila Beach Pier-7D3 and Morro Bay-2F1).*All samples were subject to unavailability due to seasonal fluctuations or unfavorable sampling conditions.
The above samples were sealed in plastic bags*immediately upon collection.
Mussels were sent to GEL in-shell where GEL*personnel removed the meat & internal organs for analysis.
Only edible portions of the fish were analyzed (fish fillets).
The samples were labeled with sample Stype, station ID, date, time of collection, and the individual who performed collection.
The samples were then frozen (to prevent spoilage odor) before they were sent to GEL for analysis.2.3.5 Food Crops The REMP required broadleaf food vegetation to be collected in the nearest off-site locations of the highest calculated annual average ground level D/Q*(dispersion parameter) within 5 miles. There was no broadleaf food vegetation available that satisfied this requirement.
Because these food products were unavailable, the DCPP REMP conducted additional air sampling in the SE (station 8S2) and NNW (station 1S1) sectors. Additional representative samples*of food crops in season were collected monthly from supplemental stations:
Cal Poly Farm (5F2), Kawaoka Farm in Arroyo Grande (7G1), Mello Farm (7C1)*along the site access road, and quarterly household gardens (3C1 and 6C1).0 The monthly samples (including 3C 1) were collected by DCPP personnel and*sealed immediately in plastic bags. The quarterly household garden sample (6C 1)*was provided to DCPP personnel by the land occupant (due to property access difficulty and privacy).
The samples were labeled with sample type, station ID, collection date, collection time, and the individual who performed collection.
The*samples were normally frozen before they were sent to GEL for analysis (to*prevent spoilage odor).0 S S S S o 0 0 2.3.6 Milk There were no animals within the vicinity of the plant that were utilized for milk consumption by humans. However, supplemental samples of cow milk were collected monthly from Cal Poly Farm (5F2) which was approximately 13 miles from DCPP. Two 1-gallon plastic containers of milk were collected each sampling period by DCPP personnel.
Forty grams of sodium bio-sulfite preservative were added to each gallon of milk sample. The containers were sealed and shaken thoroughly to distribute the preservative.
The containers were labeled with sample type, station ID, collection date, collection time, and the individual who performed collection.
The samples were then express shipped to GEL for analysis.2.3.7 Meat A rancher routinely grazed cattle, goats, and sheep within three miles of the site boundary.
These livestock meats were offered at local farmer's markets and private distribution.
This meat commodity began at the end of 2007. REMP personnel obtained meat samples of each species directly from the land owner.Gamma spec and strontium analyses were performed on the meat.Additional Fukushima Japan event meat sampling was conducted of Hearst Ranch meat which is located approximately 37 miles north of the DCPP site. This Hearst Ranch meat is free range, grass fed beef. This new REMP station code was HCM and provides a control location far from the site. REMP personnel purchased this Hearst Ranch meat directly from local grocery stores.Property owners could hunt deer and wild pig (in season) within 5 miles of the site boundary.
The REMP obtained one deer meat sample from these property owners. Gamma spec and strontium analyses were performed on the deer meat.The meat was initially packaged by the livestock owners and turned over to REMP personnel.
The packages were then separated by species and placed in large zip-lock bags. Each bag was labeled with sample type, station ID, collection date, collection time, and the individual who performed the collection.
The samples were then frozen and sent to GEL for analysis.S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TABLE 2.1: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Exposure Pathway Number of Representative Sampling Collection Frequency Type of Required or andlor Sample Type Samples and Sample Stations Analysis Supplemental Locations 1 1. Direct Radiation 2  Thirty-one routine monitoring stations containing thermo luminescent dosimeters (TLDs)such that at least two (2)phosphors are present at each station, placed as follows: An inner ring of stations, one in OS1, 0S2, Quarterly Gamma Dose Required each terrestrial meteorological WN 1, 1S1, sector in the general area of the 2S1, 3S1 4S1, SITE BOUNDARY; 5S1, 6S1, 7S1, 8S1, 9S1, 8S2, 5S3, and MT1 An outer ring of stations, one in 1A1, 0B1, IC1, Quarterly Gamma Dose Required each terrestrial meteorological 2D1, 3D1,4C1, sector in the 2.5 to 12 km range 5C1, 6D1, and from the site; and 7C1 One or two areas to serve as 4D1, 5F1 Quarterly Gamma Dose Required control stations; and The balance of the stations to 7D1, 7D2, 5F3, Quarterly Gamma Dose Required be placed in special interest 7F1, and 7G2 areas such as population centers, nearby residences, or schools.A minimum of four stations IS1, IS2, IS3, Quarterly Gamma Dose Required around the ISFSl IS4, IS5, IS6, IS7,IS8 2. Airborne Samples from > 4 stations: Radioiodine Three samples from close to the MT1, 0S2, and Continuous sampler 1-131 analysis Required three SITE BOUNDARY 8S1 operation with sample locations ( 0S2, 8S1, & MT1 ) in collection weekly, or different sectors. more frequently if required by dust loading.One sample from the vicinity of 7D1 Continuous sampler 1-131 analysis Required a community having the highest operation with sample calculated annual average collection weekly, or ground level D/Q. more frequently if required by dust loading.If food products are unavailable, 1S1 & 8S2 Continuous sampler 1-131 analysis Required additional air sampling will be operation with sample done in the NNW (station 1S1) collection weekly, or and SE (Station 8S2) sectors. more frequently if required by dust loading.One sample from a control 5F1 Continuous sampler 1-131 analysis Required location, operation with sample collection weekly, or more frequently if required by dust loading.
Table 2.1 (continued' Exposure Pathway Number of Representative Sampling Collection Type of Analysis Required or and/or Sample Type Samples and Sample Stations Frequency Supplemental Locations 1 3. Airborne Samples from > 4 stations: Particulate Three samples from close to the MT1, 0S2, and Continuous Weekly gross beta Required three SITE BOUNDARY 8S1 sampler operation radioactivity locations (0S2, 8S1, & MT1 ) in with sample analysis following different sectors. collection weekly, filter change 3.or more frequently Quarterly gamma if required by dust isotopic analysis 4 loading, of composite consisting of approx 12 filters (by location).
One sample from the vicinity of 7D1 Continuous Weekly gross beta Required a community having the highest sampler operation radioactivity calculated annual average with sample analysis following ground level D/Q. collection weekly, filter change 3.or more frequently Quarterly gamma if required by dust isotopic analysis 4 loading, of composite consisting of approx 12 filters (by location).
If food products are unavailable, 1 $S & 8S2 Continuous Weekly gross beta Required additional air sampling will be sampler operation radioactivity done in the NNW (station 1 $S) with sample analysis following 3 and SE (Station 8S2) sectors. collection weekly, filter change .or more frequently Quarterly gamma if required by dust isotopic analysis 4 loading, of composite consisting of approx 12 filters (by location).
One sample from a control 5F1 Continuous Weekly gross beta Required location, sampler operation radioactivity with sample analysis following collection weekly, filter change 3.or more frequently Quarterly gamma if required by dust isotopic analysis 4 loading, of composite consisting of approx 12 filters (by location).
: 4. Waterbome a. Surface Ocean One sample from the plant OUT, DCM, Monthly Gamma isotopic 4  Required Water Outfall, Diablo Cove, and an and 7C2 (grab sample) and tritium area not influenced by plant analysis.discharge.
One sample from the plant OUT, DCM, Quarterly Gross Beta, Supplemental Outfall, Diablo Cove, and an and 7C2 (grab sample) Total Sr, Fe-55, area not influenced by plant and Ni-63 discharge.
S S 0 0 S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S 0 0 S S 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 S S 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 0 Table 2.1 (continued)
Exposure Pathway Number of Representative Sampling Collection Type of Analysis Required or and/or Sample Type Samples and Sample Stations Frequency Supplemental Locations'
: b. Drinking Water One sample from the plant DWI and 5S2 Monthly Gamma isotopic 4 , Required drinking water, one sample from OEL (control) (grab sample) 1-131, and tritium Diablo Creek (upstream of analysis.plant), and one control sample.One sample from the plant DWl and 5S2 Quarterly Gross Beta, Supplemental drinking water, one sample from OEL (control) (grab sample) Total Sr, Fe-55, Diablo Creek (upstream of and Ni-63 plant), and one control sample.One sample from Diablo Creek WN2 and 1A2 Quarterly Gamma isotopic 4 , Supplemental (downstream of plant) and one (grab sample) tritium, 1-131, gross sample from Blanchard Spring. beta, Total Sr, Fe-55, and Ni-63 c. Groundwater One sample from wells located OWl, OW2, Quarterly Gamma isotopic 4 , Supplemental under the plant power block, and DY1 (grab sample, tritium, gross beta, when available)
Total Sr, Fe-55, and Ni-63 One sample from a well located WW2, 8S3 Quarterly Gamma isotopic 4 , Supplemental outside the plant power block (grab sample, tritium, gross beta, (control sample). when available)
Total Sr, Fe-55, and Ni-63 d. Sediment One sample of offshore ocean DCM and 7C2 Annual Gamma isotopic 4  Required sediment from Diablo Cove and (grab sample)Rattlesnake Canyon.One sample of offshore ocean DCM and 7C2 Annual Total Sr, Fe-55, Supplemental sediment from Diablo Cove and (grab sample) and Ni-63 Rattlesnake Canyon.One sample from each of five AVA, MDO, Semi- Annual Gamma isotopic 4 , Supplemental local recreational beaches. PMO, CYA, (grab sample) Total Sr, Fe-55, and CBA and Ni-63 e. Marine Flora One sample of kelp DCM, PON, Quarterly Gamma isotopic 4  Supplemental POS, and 7C2 (when available)
One sample of intertidal algae DCM and 7C2 Quarterly Gamma isotopic 4  Supplemental (when available)
Table 2.1 (continued)
Exposure Pathway Number of Representative Sampling Collection Type of Required or andlor Sample Type Samples and Sample Stations Frequency Analysis Supplemental Locations 1 5. Ingestion a. Milk Samples from milking animals in 5F2 Semimonthly Gamma isotopic 4  Supplemental three locations within 5 km when animals are and 1-131 distance having the highest on pasture; analysis.dose potential.
If there are none, monthly at other then one sample from milking times.animals in each of three areas between 5 to 8 km distance where doses are calculated to be greater than 1 mrem per year. One sample from milking animals at a control location 15 to 30 km distant and in the least prevalent wind direction.
NOTE: The sample (5F2)should be taken monthly even if there are no indicator samples available.
: b. Fish and One sample of rock fish (family DCM and 7C2 Quarterly Gamma isotopic 4  Required Invertebrates Sebastes) and one sample of (grab sample) analysis on perch (family Embiotocidae) edible portions of each sample.One sample of rock fish PON and POS Quarterly Gamma isotopic 4  Supplemental (family Sebastes) and (grab sample) analysis on one sample of perch edible portions (family Embiotocidae) of each sample.One sample of mussel DCM and 702 Quarterly Gamma isotopic 4  Required (family Mytilus) (grab sample) analysis on edible portions of each sample.One sample of mussel PON Annual Gamma isotopic 4  Supplemental (family Mytilus) (grab sample) analysis on edible portions of each sample.One sample of mussel POS Quarterly Gamma isotopic 4  Supplemental (family Mytilus) (grab sample) analysis on edible portions of each sample.One sample of locally harvested 7D3 OR 2F1 Quarterly Gamma isotopic 4  Supplemental market fish. (should (grab sample) analysis on altemate edible portions between of each sample.locations) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 S 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Table 2.1 (continued" Exposure Pathway Number of Representative Sampling Collection Type of Required or and/or Sample Type Samples and Sample Stations Frequency Analysis Supplemental Locations 1 c. Broadleaf Three samples of broadleaf Monthly Gamma isotopic 4  Required Vegetation 5  vegetation grown nearest (when available) analysis (that (see notation #5)off-site locations of highest includes 1-131)calculated annual average on edible ground level D/Q IF milk portion.sampling is not performed.
One sample of each of the Monthly Gamma isotopic 4  Required similar broadleaf vegetation (when available) analysis (that (see notation #5)grown 15 to 30 km distant in the includes 1-131)least prevalent wind direction IF on edible milk sampling is not performed.
portion.d. Vegetative One sample of broadleaf 5F2, 7C1, and Monthly Gamma isotopic 4  Supplemental Crops vegetation or vegetables or fruit 7G1 (when available) analysis on edible portion.One sample of broadleaf 3C1, 6C1 Quarterly Gamma isotopic 4  Supplemental vegetation or vegetables or fruit. (when available) analysis on edible portion.e. Meat sample One sample of each species BCM, BGM, Quarterly Gamma isotopic 4  Supplemental (cow, goat, sheep, deer, or pig) BSM, JDM, (as available and analysis, and of edible meat portion JPM, ACM, provided by land Total Sr on slaughtered for personal ADM, APM owners within 8 edible portion.consumption (not mass market). km of plant site)Table Notations 1. Deviations are permitted from the required sampling schedule if specimens are unobtainable due to circumstances such as hazardous conditions, seasonal unavailability, malfunction of automatic sampling equipment and other legitimate reasons.If specimens are unobtainable due to sampling equipment malfunction, effort shall be made to complete corrective action prior to the end of the next sampling period. All deviations from the sampling schedule shall be documented in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report. It is recognized that, at times, it may not be possible or practicable to continue to obtain samples of the media of choice at the most desired location or time. In these instances, suitable specific alternative media and locations may be chosen for the particular pathway in question and appropriate substitutions made within 30 days in the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program, and submitted in the next Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report, including a revised figure(s) and table for the ERMP reflecting the new location(s) with supporting information identifying the cause of the unavailability of samples for that pathway and justifying the section of the new location(s) for obtaining samples.2. For the purposes of this table, a thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) is considered to be one phosphor.
There are normally three calcium sulfate phosphors in an environmental TLD BADGE. Film badges shall not be used as dosimeters for measuring direct radiation.
: 3. Airborne particulate sample filters shall be analyzed for gross beta radioactivity 24 hours or more after sampling to allow for radon and thoron daughter decay. If gross beta activity in air particulate samples is greater than 10 times the yearly mean of control samples, gamma isotopic analysis shall be performed on the individual samples.4. Gamma isotopic analysis means the identification and quantification of gamma-emitting radionuclides that may be attributable to the effluents from the facility.5. If broadleaf vegetation food products are unavailable, additional air sampling as specified in Table 2.1, Parts 2 & 3 will be done in the SE (Station 8S2) and NNW (station IS1) sectors.6. The Branch Technical Position (Nov 79) states, "Any location from which milk can no longer be obtained may be dropped from the surveillance program after notifying the NRC in writing that they are no longer obtainable at that location".
Although milk sampling performed at 5F2 is outside the 5-mile radius and is supplemental to the REMP, this notification should take place if 5F2 milk sampling ceases.
TABLE 2.2 Distances and Directions to Environmental Monitoring Stations Radial Direction**
Radial Distance**
Station (True Heading) From Plant Code(a) Station Name Degrees km Miles 0S1 Exclusion Fence-Northwest Comer 320 0.16 0.1 0S2 North Gate 320 0.8 0.5 ISi Wastewater Pond 330 0.64 0.4 2S1 Back Road-300 m North of Plant 0 0.32 0.2 3S1 Road NW of 230 kV Switchyard 23 0.64 0.4 4S1 Back Road Between Switchyards 43 0.8 0.5 5S1 500 kV Switchyard 58 0.64 0.4 5S2 Diablo Creek Weir 65 0.96 0.6 5S3 Microwave Tower Road 70 1.02 0.7 6S1 Microwave Tower 94 0.8 0.5 7S1 Overlook Road 112 0.48 0.3 8S1 Target Range 125 0.8 0.5 8S2 Southwest Site Boundary 128 1.76 1.1 8S3 DCSF 96-1 monitoring well 145 0.52 0.33 9S1 South Cove 167 0.64 0.4 MT1 Meteorological Tower 185 0.32 0.2 DCM Diablo Cove Marine 270 0.32 0.2 WN1 Northwest Guard Shack 290 0.32 0.2 WN2 Diablo Creek Outlet 283 0.25 0.15 lA1 Crowbar Canyon 327 2.56 1.6 1A2 Blanchard Spring 331 2.4 1.5 OB I Point Buchon 325 5.76 3.6 iCi Montana de Oro Campground 336 7.52 4.7 3C1 Ranch Vegetation 20 7.16 4.5 4C1 Clark Valley Gravel Pit 45 9.28 5.8 5CI Junction Prefumo/See Canyon Roads 64 7.52 4.7 6C I Household Garden 98 7.24 4.5 7C1 Pecho Creek Ruins (Mello Farm) 120 6.56 4.1 7C2 Rattlesnake Canyon 124 7.52 4.7 2D 1 Sunnyside School 10 11.04 6.9 3D 1 Clark Valley 24 9.92 6.2 4D1 Los Osos Valley Road 36 12.16 7.6 6D 1 Junction See/Davis Canyon Roads 89 13.4 8.3 7D1 Avila Gate 118 10.56 6.6 7D2 Avila Beach 110 12.16 7.6 7D3 Avila Pier 120 11.0 6.9 2F 1 Morro Bay (Commercial Landing) 0 17.44 10.9 5F1 SLO OEL 79 16.41 10.2 5F2 Cal Poly Farm 60 20.16 12.6 5F3 SLO County Health Department 70 20.32 12.7 7F1 Shell Beach 110 17.28 10.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 0 Table 2.2 (continued)
Radial Direction**
Radial Distance**
Station (True Heading) From Plant Code(a) Station Name Degrees km Miles 7G1 Arroyo Grande (Kawaoka Farm) 115 26.88 16.8 7G2 Oceano Substation 118 27.68 17.3 AVA Avila Beach (near pier) 109 11.75 7.3 CBA Cambria Moonstone Beach 330 45.86 28.5 CYA Cayucos Beach (near pier) 350 26.87 16.7 DY1 Drywell 115' 77 0.041 0.026 DW1 Drinking Water (Plant Potable Water Sys)161 0.59 0.37 IS1-IS8 ISFSI 65 0.48 0.3 MDO Montana de Oro (Spooners Cove) 336 7.56 4.7 OWl Observation Well 01 336 0.07 0.046 OW2 Observation Well 02 157 0.07 .0.045 OEL Offsite Emergency Lab 79 16.41 10.2 OUT Plant Outfall 270 0.32 0.2 PMO Pismo Beach (near pier) 113 20.76 12.9 PON Pacific Ocean North of Diablo Cove 305 2.4 1.5 POS Pacific Ocean South of Diablo Cove 180 0.64 0.4 WW2 Water Well 02 70 1.02 0.63 BCM Blanchard Farm (Cow Meat) 320 1.94 1.2 BGM Blanchard Farm (Goat Meat) 320 1.94 1.2 BSM Blanchard Farm (Sheep Meat) 320 1.94 1.2 HCM Hearst Ranch (Cow Meat) 328 59.5 37 JDM Johe Property (Deer Meat) 21 5.24 3.26*The reference point used is the dome of Unit 1 containment.
*Station Code (XYZ): X -First number (0-9) represents the radial sector in which the station is located: 0 -Northwest 5 -East-northeast 1 -North-northwest 6 -East 2 -North 7 -East-southeast 3 -North-northeast 8 -Southeast 4 -Northeast 9 -South-southeast Y -Letter (S, A-H) represents the distance from the plant: S -On-site A 2 miles from plant (but off-site)B 4 miles from plant C 6 miles from plant D 8 miles from plant E 10 miles from plant F 15 miles from plant G 20 miles from plant H -Greater than 20 miles from plant Z -Second number represents the station number within the zone.
0 0 0 0 0 Table 2.2 (continued) 0*Station Codes exceptions:
The following stations do not follow the coding system: " Diablo Cove Marine (DCM)" Meteorological Tower (MT1)" Northwest guard shack (WN1)* Diablo Creek outlet (WN2)" Pacific Ocean North (PON)" Pacific Ocean South (POS)* Offsite Emergency Lab (OEL)* Plant outfall (OUT)* Drinking water (DWI)* Water Well 02 (WW2)* Observation Well 01 (OW 1)* Observation Well 02 (OW2)* Drywell 115 (DY1)* Avila Beach (AVA)* Montana de Oro -Spooners Cove (MDO)* Pismo Beach (PMO)* Cayucos Beach (CYA)* Cambria Moonstone Beach (CBA)* Blanchard Cow Meat (BCM)* Blanchard Goat Meat (BGM)* Blanchard Sheep Meat (BSM)* Hearst Ranch Cow Meat (HCM)* Johe Deer Meat (JDM)* Johe Pig Meat (JPM)Andre Cow Meat (ACM)* Andre Deer Meat (ADM)* Andre Pig Meat (APM)* ISFSI TLDs (ISI -IS8)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 TABLE 2.3: Detection Capabilities for Environmental Sample Analysis (1)(2)Lower Limits of Detection (LLD) (3)Airborne Water Particulate or Analvsis (nCi/L) Gases (nCi/m 3 1 Fish (nCi/kg. wet)Food Milk Products (DCi/L) (nCi/kor.
wet)Sediment (DCi/k2. drv)Gross beta 4 0.01 H-3 400 Mn-54 15 130 Fe-59 30 260 Co-58, 60 15 130 Zn-65 30 260 Zr-Nb-95 15 Total Sr 1 1 500 2,000 1-131 1* 0.07 1 60 Cs-134 15 0.05 130 15 60 150 Cs-137 18 0.06 150 18 80 180 Ba-La-140 15 15 Table Notations (1) This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be considered.
Other peaks that are identifiable, together with those of the above nuclides, shall also be analyzed and reported in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report.(2) Required detection capabilities for thermoluminescent dosimeters used for environmental measurements shall be in accordance with the recommendations of Regulatory Guide 4.13, Revision 1, July 1977.(3) The LLD is defined, for purposes of these specifications, as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count, above system background, that will be detected with 95 percent probability with only 5 percent probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal.* If no drinking water pathway exists, a value of 15 pCi/L may be used.
TABLE 2.3 (Continued) 0 Table Notations For a particular measurement system, which may include radiochemical separation:
LLD = 4.6 6 Sb E x V x 2.22 x Y x exp(-Xt)Where: LLD = the "a priori" the lower limit of detection as defined above (as pCi per unit mass or volume)Sb = the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate (as counts per minute)E = the counting efficiency (as counts per transformation)
V = the sample size (in units of mass or volume)2.22 = the number of transformations per minute per pico-curie Y = the fractional radiochemical yield (when applicable)
? = the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide t = the elapsed time between sample collection (or end of the sample collection period) and time of counting The value of Sb used in the calculation of the LLD for a detection system will be based on the actual observed variance of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of the blank samples (as appropriate) rather than on an unverified theoretically predicted variance.
In calculating the LLD for a radionuclide determined by gamma-ray spectrometry, the background will include the typical contributions of other radionuclides normally present in the samples (e.g., potassium-40 in milk samples).Analyses will be performed in such a manner that the stated LLDs will be achieved under routine conditions.
Occasionally background fluctuations, unavoidably small sample sizes, the presence of interfering nuclides, or other uncontrollable circumstances may render these LLDs unachievable.
In such cases, the contributing factors will be identified and described in the Annual Environmental Radiological Operating Report.0 Typical values of E, V, Y and t should be used in the calculation.
It should be recognized that the LLD is defined as a pdori (before the fact) limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not as a posteriori (after the fact) limit for a particular measurement.
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TABLE 2.4: Reporting Levels for Radioactivity Concentrations in Environmental Samples Water Analysis (pCi/L)Airborne Particulate or Gases (pCi/m 3)Fish (pCi/kg, wet)Milk (pCi/L)Food Products (pCi/kg, wet)H-3 20,000 Mn-54 1,000 30,000 Fe-59 400 10,000 Co-58 1,000 30,000 Co-60 300 10,000 Zn-65 300 20,000 Sr-89 20 Sr-90/Y-90 8 Zr-Nb-95 400 1-131 ** 2 0.9 3 100 Cs-134 30 10 1,000 60 1,000 Cs-137 50 20 2,000 70 2,000 Ba-La-140 200 300* For drinking water samples. This is the 40 CFR 141 value. If no drin a value of 30,000 pCi/L may be used.*
* If no drinking water pathway exists, a value of 20 pCi/L may be used king water pathway exists, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PageIntntinaly Bank0 0 PageIntntinaly Bank0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 iue21 iboCno f-ieSain 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PageIntetionlly lan 0 PageIntntinaly Bank0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pacific Ocean 5 Mile Radius SE N I 0 5 miles I I I I I I LEGEND A Dosimetry Station o1 Air Particulate Station* Biological Sampling Station* Diablo Canyon Power Plant Units 1 and 2 Diablo Canyon off-site stations.
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page Intentionally Blank 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0*0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0* Figure 2.2- Diablo Canyon On-site Stations 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 S S 0 S S S 0 S S S S S S S S S S S Page Intentionally Blank 5 S S S S 0 S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S MI rwve PRTR°cI. ;. , 9 SiteO B sL.--7SIA MT1 ANl Met Building -Met Station E 8Sl1l AN Intake Area e'"W Posel, Breakwsater  DCPP Onsite ERMP Stations 0 S S S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page Intentionally Blank 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fiue23 iboCno tto oain 0 0 iue23Dal ano tto oain 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page Intentionally Blank 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page Intentionally Blank 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0* 3.0 RADIOLOGICAL DATA-
 
==SUMMARY==
 
OF TABLES This section summarizes the analytical results of the environmental samples, which were collected 0during the monitoring period. The results, shown in Appendix A, are presented in a format similar to that prescribed in the NRC's Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position on Environmental Monitoring.
The results are ordered by sample media type and then by radionuclide.
Each table is nuclide specific, and the total number of analyses for that radionuclide during the monitoring period, are provided.
Additionally, the number of measurements which exceeded the*Reporting Levels (NRC Notification Level) found in Table 2.4 of this report are provided.
The first column lists the matrix or pathway sampled during the period. The second column lists the nuclides analyzed and number of samples performed.
The third column provides the required a-priori Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) for radionuclides that have detection capability requirements as specified in Table 2.3 of this report. The sixth and seventh columns contain the mean and average results for locations.
The eighth column contains the number for reportable occurrences for the location pathway. Occasionally, the required LLD is not met. An example of this occurrence might be due to hold times between sampling and analysis.
Such cases, if any, are addressed in Section 4.0 of this report.The Minimum Detectable Concentration (MDC) listed for each analysis in Appendix C was used as an evaluation point for samples collected in the calendar year. The MDC was calculated by the Slaboratory with each analysis (a-posteriori) and incorporates conditions observed at the laboratory during the analysis.
This MDC value mathematically represents the lowest concentration of activity that can be detected by the laboratory with a 95% confidence level. The MDC is also understood as 0the concentration where there is only a 5% probability of falsely reporting a positive detection in a true blank sample. Note that the MDC equation used by the environmental lab is equivalent to the Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) equation specified in NUREG 1301. For this report, a sample is considered to yield a 'detectable measurement" when the "result" concentration exceeds the*associated MDC value.*Additionally, the tables of Appendix A provide the mean of all sample results analyzed for the specified radionuclide/
media type, the range, and the number-of samples that were considered to Shave detectable activity of all the samples counted.0 The mean value consists of the average of detectable concentrations.
0 The lowest and highest detected concentration values were listed* The number of detectable measurements and the total number of measurements were listed. For example, (4/20) would indicate that 4 of the 20 samples collected, for that 0sample type and that radionuclide, contained detectable radioactivity.
0 The radionuclides reported in this section represent those that:* had an LLD requirement in Table 2.3 of this report, or a Reporting Level listed in Table 2.4* were of specific interest for any other reason 0The radionuclides routinely analyzed and reported for a gamma spectroscopy analysis are: Ac-228,*Ag-1 10m, Be-7, K-40, Ce-144, Co-57, Co-58, Co-60, Cr-51, 1-131, Cs-134, Cs-137, Ba-140, La-140, Fe-59, Mn-54, Nb-95, Ru-103, Rh-106, Sb-124, Sb-125, Zn-65, and Zr-95.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Data from direct radiation measurements made by TLD are also provided in Appendix A in a similar format described above. Actual quarterly TLD results are listed in Appendix B.Additional supplemental REMP sampling was conducted in 2011 for the Fukushima Prefecture Japan, Dai-Ichi NPS nuclear accidents.
This Fukushima event sampling data is also provided in Appendix A tables as described above.0 4.0 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESULTS 0 4.1 REMP Sampling Variance / Deviations The DCPP Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program allows for deviations in the REMP sampling schedule "if samples are unobtainable due to hazardous conditions, seasonal unavailability, or malfunction of sampling equipment." Such deviations do not compromise the program's effectiveness and are normally anticipated for any radiological environmental monitoring program.The DCPP REMP includes both required and supplemental samples. This section describes the variances with the required samples and describes some of the supplemental sampling during the year.4.1.1 DIRECT RADIATION There were no abnormal affects to the 2011 station environmental TLD results.Previous reporting errors were made in the 2009 and 2010 AREORs for stations 1Al and 4S1.Corrections are as follows: 2009 1A1 reported total dose was 48.5 mrem ; corrected total dose is 47.4 mrem.2009 1A1 reported average dose was 12.1 mrem ; corrected average dose is 11.9 mrem.2009 1A1 reported standard deviation was 0.9 ; corrected standard deviation is 0.7.2009 1A1 reported 2x standard deviation was 1.7 ; corrected 2x standard deviation is 1.5.2009 4S1 reported total dose was 80.5 mrem ; corrected total dose is 76.7 mrem.2009 4S1 reported average dose was 20.1 mrem ; corrected average dose is 19.2 mrem.2009 4S1 reported standard deviation was 1.2 ; corrected standard deviation is 0.6.2009 4S1 reported 2x standard deviation was 2.5 ; corrected 2x standard deviation is 1.3.2010 lA1 reported total dose was 48.5 mrem ; corrected total dose is 45.1 mrem.2010 1 Al reported average dose was 12.1 mrem; corrected average dose is 11.3 mrem.2010 1A1 reported standard deviation was 0.9 ; corrected standard deviation is 1.2.2010 1AI reported 2x standard deviation was 1.7 ; corrected 2x standard deviation is 2.4.2010 4S 1 reported total dose was 80.5 mrem ; corrected total dose is 74.4 mrem.2010 4S 1 reported average dose was 20.1 mrem; corrected average dose is 18.6 mrem.2010 4S1 reported standard deviation was 1.2 ; corrected standard deviation is 1.3.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S* 4.1.2 AIRBORNE RADIOACTIVITY The mean percent availability for all on-site and off-site air samplers was 99.9 percent. This means, on average, all air samplers were up and running 99.9 percent of the time. The remaining S0.1 percent can be attributed to equipment problems, filter exchange, and calibration processes.
Actual percent availability for each station were as follow:*0S2 = 99.9,%1S1 = 99.9 %5Fi = 100 %7D1 100 %8S1 = 99.7 %8S2 =99.9 %~MT1 = 100 %*Approximately 22 hours of air sampler lost run time occurred at station 8S1 from 1/19/11 to 01/26/11 due to an electrical power outage at this location.Approximately 4 hours of air sampler lost run time occurred at stations 0S2, IS 1, 8S1, and 8S2*from 5/25/11 to 6/1/11 due to an electrical power outage at these locations.
0 4.1.3 MARINE SAMPLES All marine samples were collected as scheduled (including allowable variation).
The California Department of Fish and Game has issued regulations prohibiting the collection of abalone along the central and southern coast of California.
PG&E considers is unlikely that 0collection of abalone will be allowed in the DCPP environs in the near future. The REMP has therefore ceased routine abalone sampling.
Note that the sampling of abalone was previously performed and was supplemental to the REMP.*4.1.4 TERRESTRIAL SAMPLES All terrestrial samples were collected as scheduled (including allowable variation).
*4.1.5 OCEAN SURFACE WATER, DRINKING WATER, AND GROUNDWATER All water samples were collected as scheduled (including allowable variation).
0 4.1.6 REPLICATE SAMPLES Replicate sampling is conducted within the REMP for program strength and correlation.
*Replicate samples were taken from 5F2 Vegetation (3/28/11), 5F2 Milk (3/21/11),*DYi Water (3/14/11), 7C2 Water (6/13/11), and OEL Drinking Water (9/29/11).
The results of the analyses were within expected correlation.
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.2 COMPARISON OF ACHIEVED LLDS WITH REQUIREMENTS For each analysis having an LLD requirement, criteria for the calculated "a priori" (before the fact) LLD were met during the sampling and analysis process. Meeting these process criteria satisfies the "a priori" LLD requirements.
The "a posteriori" (after the fact) Minimum Detectable Concentration (MDC) for that analysis was also compared with the required "a priori" (before the fact) LLD.Table 2.3 of this report gives the required "a priori" Lower Limits of Detection (LLDs) for environmental sample analyses required by the DCPP Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program. Occasionally an LLD is not achievable due to situations, such as hold times between sampling and analysis.
In such a case, a discussion of the situation is provided.The supplemental Fukushima event air sampling was conducted with different protocols than the normal REMP sampling and therefore the normal REMP LLDs may or may not apply. For example, the REMP increased Fukushima event sampling air flow (2.0 scfmn) which resulted in increased sample volumes during those time periods. The Fukushima sampling event particulate filters were analyzed at the end of each week (instead of quarterly) which destroyed the filters for strontium analysis.S All other REMP samples analyzed met the specific "a-priori" LLD requirements in 2011.4.3 COMPARISON OF RESULTS AGAINST REMP REPORTING LEVELS 0 Notification is required whenever a Reporting Level in Table 2.4 of this document is exceeded.Reporting Levels are the environmental concentrations that relate to the ALARA design dose objectives of 10 CFR 50, Appendix I. It should be noted that environmental concentrations are averaged over calendar quarters for the purposes of this comparison, and that Reporting Levels apply only to measured levels of radioactivity due to DCPP plant related effluents.
No REMP Reporting Levels were exceeded during this monitoring period.0 It should be noted that Fukushima Japan event related isotopes are not DCPP plant related effluents and therefore do not apply to these reporting levels.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0* 4.4 DATA ANALYSIS BY MEDIA TYPE*The REMP data for each media type is discussed below. A sample is considered to yield a"detectable measurement" when the result concentration exceeds the MDC for that analysis.*4.4.1 Direct Radiation (Environmental TLDs)Direct radiation is continuously measured at 31 locations surrounding DCPP using Panasonic UD-814 thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). These 31 locations are made up of 29 indicator stations & 2 control stations.
These dosimeters are collected every calendar quarter for readout at the DCPP TLD Lab. The results are trended with preoperational and historical operating values for adverse trends.DCPP Environmental TLD standard quarter results are measurements of all environmental gamma 0radiation sources (cosmic, terrestrial, radon, etc) at each station during the deployment period.Transient and lab storage background dose contributions were subtracted prior to reporting.
*It should be noted that the following Environmental TLD locations are all within the DCPP site boundary and are not located within the unrestricted area :0S1, 0S2, WNl, 1S1, 2S1, 3S1, 4S1, 5S1, 5S3, 6S1, 7S1, 8S1, 8S2, 9S1, MT1, and IS1 through IS8. The unrestricted area surrounding DCPP is sparsely inhabited out to five miles from the site (see 2011 Land Use Census). The*ambient direct radiation levels within the DCPP plant site boundary (approximately 800 meter radius from U- I CTMT structure) were elevated due to dry cask used fuel and radioactive material storage. An evaluation of direct radiation measurements and member of public occupancy times*within the site boundary indicated all federal criteria f6r member of public dose limits were conservatively met.The first graph provided below illustrated overall trending of environmental TLDs with regard to distance from the DCPP plant site. Inner ring, outer ring, special interest, and control stations were Scombined and averaged to obtain a single standard quarter value for each plot line represented.
It should be noted that inner and outer ring TLD averages remain within and trend with pre-operational ranges. It should also be noted that ISFSI loading and the Fukushima Japan nuclear 0accidents have not affected these inner and outer ring trending results.The second graph provided below illustrated averaged environmental TLD results from the northwest (stations OS 1, 0S2, OB 1) and southeast (stations 8S1, 8S2) sectors. These sectors were chosen for graphical trending due to historical wind rose results for the site. The northwest and 5southeast sectors have been the highest historical averaged wind directions and therefore would have the most impact on environmental TLD results. Averaged control stations (4D 1, 5F 1) were provided for reference.
0Appendix B provides individual station environmental TLD standard quarter dose results.Appendix B also provides an individual station historical average along with low/high ranges from 1987 to 2010 for comparison of the 2011 data.No adverse trends were noted in 2011 Environmental TLD monitoring.
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Trending Of TLD Direct Radiation Results 30.0 I.-Inner Ring Stations-Outer Ring Stations-Special Interest Stations Control Stations Inner Ring Stations -OS1. WN1, OS2.1S, 2S1, 3S1, 451, 5Sl. 5S3,6S1, 7S1, 8S1, 8.2. 9Sl, and MT1 Out*r Ring Stations -A1. OBI, IC1, 2D1.3D1. 4C1, SCI, 6D1, and 7C1 Speclal Interest Stations -7M1, 701, 7D2, 7G2, and 5F3 Control Stations -401 and 5F1 ISF81 Stations -IS1, IS2, IS3, IS4, IS5, IS6, IS7. & ISS 20-Northwest Sector Average-Southeast Sector Average-Control Stations Northwest Sectotr -OS1, 0S2, and 0B1 Southeast Sector -8S1 and 8S2 Control Stations -401 and SF1 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 20: Year 30.0 15.0 00 .0I 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 Year 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 0 S S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Direct radiation is also continuously measured at 8 stations surrounding the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) using Panasonic UD-814 thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). These 8 stations are located directly adjacent to the ISFSI protected area, with 2 stations on each of the four sides of the ISFSI pad. It should be noted that these stations and the ISFSI are well within the DCPP site boundary and are not located within the unrestricted area. These dosimeters are collected every calendar quarter for readout at the DCPP TLD Lab. The first spent fuel canister was loaded onto the ISFSI pad in June 2009. The small increase in radiation levels at the ISFSI pad prior to spent fuel canister load was due to storage of Radioactive Material (RAM) equipment in seatrains at the ISFSI pad prior to an outage. These seatrains of RAM were removed prior to the first load of spent fuel canisters.
In May 2010, DCPP began the second ISFSI loading of spent fuel canisters.
The ambient direct radiation levels within the DCPP plant site boundary near the ISFSI were elevated due to dry cask used fuel storage. An evaluation of direct radiation measurements and member of public occupancy times surrounding the ISFSI indicated all federal criteria for member of public dose limits were conservatively met. No adverse trends were noted at the DCPP inner ring stations due to ISFSI for 2011 as indicated by the previous graphs. It should be noted that the DCPP inner ring TLD results tracked in correlation with normal Environmental TLD outer ring, special interest, and control station fluctuations.
It should also be noted that DCPP inner ring TLD results remain within pre-operational ranges.i.Onsite ISFS1 Boundary TLD Stations 55.0-4 ISFSI Load Start 50.0 45.0 -35.0- -30.0 30.0 .....25.0 20.0 15.0[--1I5F5S1 Station-s Om.its ISFSI Statlons -ISI, IS2, IS3, IS4, IS5, IS, IS7, & ISO 2005 2010 2015 2020 Year 2025 2030 2035 0 0 0 0 4.4.2 Airborne Air particulate and radioiodine samples were collected weekly from six indicator stations (MT 1, 0S2, ISI, 7D1, 8S1, and 8S2) in the DCPP environs and one control station (5F1). A total of 364 air particulate filters and 364 iodine cartridges were collected and analyzed as part of the normal REMP. Additional air sampling was conducted from 3-16-11 through 5-4-11 due to the Fukushima Japan nuclear accidents.
The data collected for the air sampling program is summarized in Appendix A, Appendix C, and Appendix D..Gross beta activity was detected in almost every weekly air particulate sample collected from all indicator and control stations.
Comparison of the data showed that the mean values of gross beta activities for the indicator stations were consistent with those obtained for the control station and historical trending.
Normal background gross beta values range from 2E-3 to 9E-2 pCi/m3. The gross beta activities detected at the air sampling stations are tabulated in Appendix A.Gamma isotopic analyses were performed on quarterly composites of the air particulate filters from each of the normal REMP stations.
The Fukushima event supplemental air samples were analyzed individually at the end of each week. 1-131, 1-132, Te-132, Cs-134, and Cs-137 were detected in REMP and Fukushima event supplemental air sampling in March, April, and May.These isotopes originated from the Fukushima Japan nuclear accidents and were transported to the west coast of the United States via the jet stream. It should be noted that the 2-12-11 identification of isotopes is due to the quarterly analysis midpoint reference of the first quarter of 2011. Therefore, isotopes captured on normal REMP particulate filters in March (after the Fukushima event) were counted with the other REMP filters from the first quarter and the midpoint date assigned.
Appendix A summarizes those results.A total of 364 normal REMP weekly charcoal cartridges were analyzed for Iodine- 131.Additional Fukushima event air sampling was also conducted from 3-16-11 through 5-4-11.Iodine-131 was detected in these charcoal cartridges during these date ranges due to the Fukushima Japan nuclear accidents.
These isotopes were transported to the west coast of the United States via the jet stream. The supplemental Fukushima event air sampling was conducted at an increased flow rate (2.0 scfm) and increased volume.No Iodine- 131 was detected in any of the remaining station charcoal cartridges after 5-4-11.Appendix A summarizes normal REMP and Fukushima event supplemental air sampling results.0 4.4.3 Drinking Water, Ocean Surface Water, and Groundwater Drinking Water Drinking water samples were collected from stations DW1, 5S2, WN2, 1A2, and OEL (control location).
The samples were analyzed for gamma emitters, gross beta, tritium, Total Strontium, Iron-55, and Nickle-63.
No plant related radionuclides were detected in any of the drinking water samples.The results of the water samples collected from both the indicator and control stations are summarized in Appendix A.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ocean Surface Water Ocean surface water samples were collected monthly from stations OUT, DCM, and control 0station 7C2. The samples were analyzed for gamma emitters, gross beta, tritium, Total Strontium,*Iron-55, and Nickle-63.
No plant related radionuclides were detected in any of the samples.0The results of the water samples collected from both the indicator and control stations are*summarized in Appendix A.0Groundwater
*As part of the nuclear industry NEI 07-07 Groundwater Protection Initiative (GPI), DCPP began sampling Various water sources in 2006. These sources included onsite monitoring wells (OWl,*OW2, DY1, & 8S3), an aquifer well (WW2), a creek (5S2 & WN2), and a groundwater spring*(1A2).*Two groundwater aquifer wells are available within the plant site boundary; Water Well 01 and*Water Well 02. These wells are located about 115' above and to the east of the power block.Water Well 01 was abandoned and the well pump was inoperable.
Water Well 02 was sampled and only naturally occurring isotopes were detected.One shallow (approximately 70 feet deep) subsurface monitoring well was located Southeast at*approximately
 
===0.3 miles===
from the power block. This monitoring well is labeled DCSF96-1 (8S3).No tritium or plant related isotopes were found in the 8S3 monitoring well during 2011.*Stations 5S2, WN2, and 1A2 were discussed in the previous Drinking Water paragraph.
Three shallow (approximately 37 to 73 feet deep) subsurface monitoring wells are located within the plant protected area and in close proximity to the containment structures, spent fuel pools, and*auxiliary building (plant power block). These monitoring wells are labeled Observation Well 01 (OWl), Observation Well 02 (OW2), and Drywell 115 (DY1). Due to rainwater washout of gaseous tritium exiting the plant vent system (via an approved discharge path), these monitoring
*wells contained low levels of tritium throughout 2011. Further reporting of these monitoring wells was provided in Section 5.2 of this report.*Two additional groundwater monitoring wells were installed along the western side of the DCPP site on December 14, 2011. These wells were not ready for sampling in 2011. Future sampling will begin in the 2012 AREOR. For informational purposes, drill tailing sediment samples were*obtained during the drilling process and analyzed for gamma spec. The drill tailing sediment samples are reported within this 2011 annual report within Appendix C. The new well station names are GW 1 and GW2.0 4.4.4 Ingestion*Marine Biological Samples Fish samples were collected quarterly from stations DCM, 7C2 (control), PON, POS, and a local market (7D3 or 2F1). Mussels were collected quarterly from stations DCM, 7C2, and POS. Mussels were collected annually from station PON. A summary of these samples (required and supplemental) is described in Table 2.1. A summary of sample results is provided in Appendix A.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1-131 was detected in mussels at station 7C2 on 3-23-11 due to rain washout of Fukushima Japan 0 event isotopes.
The 7C2 sampling station is located at the discharge of a creek into the Pacific Ocean. The watershed for this creek caused large concentrations of 1-131 to be available for mussel uptake. See Fukushima rain 1-131 sampling results in Appendix A. These isotopes were transported from Japan to the west coast of the United States via the jet stream.All other marine fish and mussel samples did not detect any DCPP related radionuclides during 2011.Marine Aquatic Vegetation Supplemental marine aquatic kelp sampling was performed quarterly at REMP sample stations DCM, PON, POS, and 7C2 (control).
No DCPP related isotopes were detected in 2011.Supplemental intertidal algae sampling was performed quarterly at RENT sample stations DCM and 7C2 (control).
No DCPP related isotopes were detected in 2011.Each sample was analyzed for gamma emitting radionuclides.
A summary of the sample results is provided in Appendix A.Ocean Sediment and Recreational Beach Sampling Ocean sediment samples were collected annually from stations DCM and 7C2. Gamma Spec, Total Strontium, Iron-55, and Nickle-63 were analyzed.Supplemental recreational beach sand samples were collected semi-annually from stations Avila Beach (AVA), Montana de Oro Spooner's Cove (MDO), Pismo Pier Beach (PMO), Cayucos Morro Strand State Beach (CYA), and Cambria Moonstone Beach (CBA). Each sample was analyzed for gamma emitting radionuclides, Total Strontium, Iron-55, and Nickle-63.
Only natural occurring isotopes where detected in the ocean sediment and recreational beach sand samples collected for 2011.4.4.5 Food Crops (Vegetation)
Samples of broad leaf vegetation were collected monthly (when available) from two indicator stations (7C1 and 7G1), and one control location (5F2). Samples were collected quarterly from residence gardens at stations 3C 1 and 6C 1. The samples were analyzed for gamma emitting radionuclides and for Iodine- 131 on edible portions.1-131, Cs-134, and Cs-137 were detected in these vegetation samples due to the Fukushima Japan nuclear accidents.
These isotopes were transported to the west coast of the United States via the jet stream.0 As further control sampling, supplemental Fukushima event vegetation sampling was conducted in Atascadero, California (20 miles north of DCPP). These Fukushima related isotopes were also detected in various vegetation samples at this control station. A summary of the sample results are provided in Appendix A.4.4.6 Milk There are no milking animals within 5 miles of the plant site. In cases where milk sampling is not available, the REMP program permits the collection of broad leaf vegetation from three sample 0 0 0 0 0 0 locations in place of milk. Since broadleaf sampling is also not available in the DCPP environs, the*DCPP REMP requires additional air sampling at stations 8S2 and IS 1.*Supplemental samples of milk were collected monthly from Cal Poly Farm (station 5F2). The samples were analyzed for gamma emitting radionuclides, Iodine- 131, and Total Strontium.
Milk samples were collected monthly from station 5F2 regardless of the availability of milk stations*within 5 miles of the plant.*1-131, Cs-134, and Cs-137 were detected in these milk samples due to the Fukushima Japan nuclear accidents.
These isotopes were transported to the west coast of the United States via the jet stream.Vegetation uptake and subsequent digestion by the cows were the source of these isotopes into the*milk. A summary of the sample results are provided in Appendix A.*4.4.7 Meat Products Meat products were collected quarterly (when available and provided) from landowners.
*Samples of livestock meat were collected from the Blanchard Ranch in 2011. These samples were Blanchard cow meat (BCM), Blanchard sheep meat (BSM), and Blanchard goat meat (BGM).One wild deer meat sample was supplied by a landowner in 2011.*Additional Fukushima Japan event meat sampling was conducted of Hearst Ranch meat which is located approximately 37 miles north of the DCPP site. This Hearst Ranch meat is free range, grass 0fed beef. This new REMP station code was HCM and provides a control location far from the site.Cs-134 and Cs-137 were detected in these meat samples due to the Fukushima Japan nuclear accidents.
These isotopes were transported to the west coast of the United States via the jet stream.Vegetation uptake and subsequent digestion by the animals were the source of these isotopes into the meat. A summary of the sample results are provided in Appendix A.4.5 SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING AND ISOTOPIC DETECTION*DUE TO THE FUKUSHIMA PREFECTURE JAPAN, DAI-ICHI NUCLEAR POWER STATION*ACCIDENTS.
0 On March 11 th, 2011 the Tohoku earthquake (magnitude 9.0 Mw ) and tsunami struck the east coast of Japan. The tsunami associated with this event caused nuclear accidents at the Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Station in Fukushima Prefecture, Japan. Isotopic releases occurred in Japan and were carried by the jet stream to the west coast of the United States.The DCPP REMP initiated numerous supplemental sampling to establish Fukushima contributions to DCPP isotopic background concentrations.
Supplemental DCPP environmental sampling*included the following:
* Capture of rain in March and April for isotopic analysis (see Appendix A & D)0 0 Additional air sampling at stations 0S2, 5F1, 7D 1, and 8S 1. This air sampling was conducted with additional air samplers at an increased flow rate (2.0 scfm) and increased 0volumes.
The station samples were analyzed each week for gamma isotopic and strontium*which is different than normal REMP sampling protocols (see Appendix D)0 0 0 0 0 0* Additional milk and vegetation sampling was conducted at station 5F2 (Appendix A & C). 0" Additional vegetation sampling was conducted outside the possible influence of DCPP within Atascadero, California (20 miles north of DCPP). Fescue grass, milk thistle, miner's lettuce, and acorns were sampled in Atascadero (station ATAS) to establish additional control vegetation samples (see Appendix D)." Additional meat control sampling was conducted outside the possible influence of DCPP at Hearst Ranch which is located 37 miles north of DCPP near San Simeon, California.
Publically offered Hearst Ranch meat (station HCM) was free range, grass fed beef and provided a control for Blanchard meat (stations BCM, BSM, and BGM). The HCM sampling was provided in Appendix A & C.* Sticky pads (1 ft by 3ft) were placed at 0S2 and 5F 1 to monitor ground deposition of Fukushima isotopes.
These sticky pads were pulled weekly from 3-23-11 until 5-4-11 for isotopic analysis (see Appendix A & D).Fukushima related isotopes were detected by the DCPP REMP beginning on March 17'h, 2011.The primary Fukushima related isotopes detected by the DCPP REMP were 1-131, 1-132, Te- 132, Cs-134, and Cs-137.Airborne isotopic concentrations were detected from March 17kh thru April 20tb.The DCPP REMP continued to detect cesium within milk, vegetation, and meat throughout the end of 2011.These supplemental REMP environmental air, rain, vegetation, milk, meat, and sticky pad samples were obtained during 2011. These samples identified detectable concentrations of isotopes that could be related to operation of Diablo Canyon NPS. Given the following facts, the detectable isotopic concentrations are not a result of Diablo Canyon NPS operation:
0 1. The quantities of radioactive airborne effluents from Diablo Canyon NPS during 2011 did not increase significantly compared to year 2010.2. Prior REMP sample results have not detected the presence of these isotopes at these concentrations over the last ten years of DCPP operation.
: 3. The isotopes detected correspond to timelines related to the Fukushima Prefecture Japan nuclear accidents and the jet stream deposition of those isotopes to the west coast of the United States.4. The concentrations detected within the indicator samples were also identified in the normal REMP control samples and supplemental Fukushima event sampling far from Diablo Canyon NPS.5. These isotopes were also detected by other Government Agencies, Nuclear Power Sites, and Colleges across the United States.As such, the atypical detection of these radionuclides in both indicator and control samples is credibly attributed to the trans-Pacific transport of airborne releases from Dai-Ichi, Fukushima following the March 11, 2011 Tohoku earthquake and was not related to the operations of Diablo Canyon NPS. A summary of the sample results are provided in Appendix A, Appendix C, and Appendix D.0 0 0 0 0 S* 5.0 GROUND WATER MONITORING Diablo Canyon is committed to improving management of situations involving inadvertent radiological releases that get into onsite groundwater that is or may be used as a source of drinking water. This commitment reflects the nuclear industry's high standard of public radiation safety and protection of the environment.
Trust and confidence on the part of local communities, States, the NRC, and the public is paramount to this commitment.
Studies of the DCPP ISFSI site and a general assessment of sub-regional hydro-geologic conditions indicates that groundwater (subsurface) flow beneath the Diablo Canyon power block site is west toward the Pacific Ocean or northwest toward Diablo Creek. It should be noted that Diablo Creek also discharges into the Pacific Ocean.5.1 NEI 07-07 GROUNDWATER PROTECTION INITIATIVE VOLUNTARY REPORTING 5.1.1 NEI 07-07 Objective 2.4, Annual Reporting:
Document all on-site ground water sample results and a description of any significant on-site leaks/spills into ground water for each calendar year in the AREOR or the ARERR*DCPP Response to NEI 07-07 Objective
 
===2.4 Onsite===
groundwater monitoring points are described in the REMP and reported in this Annual*Radiological Environmental Operating Report (AREOR) as follows:Observation Well 01 (OWl), Observation Well 02 (OW2), Drywell 115 (DY1), DCSF96-1 (8S3),*Water Well 02 (WW2), and Diablo Creek Outlet (WN2) were used for data reporting.
A summary of the sample results are provided in Appendix A and Appendix C.*DCPP REMP sampled all available groundwater regardless of present or future use. The ground water beneath the DCPP protected area is not used as a source of drinking water.There were no significant onsite leaks/spills into groundwater in 2011.5Note: the term "significant" is defined by the NEI Initiative as an item or incident that is of Sinterest to the public or stakeholders.
It does not imply or refer to regulatory terminology nor is it*intended to indicate that the leak or spill has public health and safety or environmental protection consequences.
This term also has a volume component of greater than 100 gallons.5.2 ADDITIONAL GROUNDWATER SAMPLING OVERVIEW: o*Ground water monitoring was reported in accordance with the nuclear industry NEI 07-07 5Groundwater Protection Initiative and the REMP. Concentrations of tritium were detected in three monitoring wells beneath the DCPP power block. This tritium was coming from the rain-0washout of gaseous tritium exiting the plant vent system via an approved discharge route. DCPP has conducted rain-washout studies to document this phenomenon.
These monitoring wells consisted of French drain systems that discharge into the associated monitoring well (OW 1, S S S S S S OW2, or DYl). Rain communicated with these French drain systems via building structure to ground interfaces.
Once rain water entered the monitoring wells, the water remained stagnant until another rain event caused transport.
Subsequent quarterly sampling routinely indicated correlated tritium values due to monitoring well stagnation.
DY 1 routinely experienced the highest tritium rain washout concentrations due to its close proximity to the plant vent discharge points. It should be noted that hydro geological studies of the DCPP site indicate that any groundwater (subsurface) flow beneath DCPP would flow toward the Pacific Ocean.The specific ranges of tritium detected in these monitoring wells for 2011 are as follows: OW l -Observation Well 01 ( 401 to 710 pCi/L ) of 4 samples collected for tritium analysis.OW2 -Observation Well 02 ( 1,140 to 1,340 pCi/L ) of 4 samples collected for tritium analysis.DY1 -Drywell 115 ( 11,800 to 64,800 pCi/L ) of 7 samples collected for tritium analysis.No other DCPP related isotopes were detected.Monitoring Well 8S3 was sampled 4 times in 2011. Tritium was not detected in these 4 samples from 8S3. No other DCPP related isotopes were detected.All other samples of groundwater at 1A2, WW2, and WN2 did not indicate the presence of tritium or any other DCPP related isotopes (only naturally occurring radionuclides were observed).
6.0 OLD STEAM GENERATOR STORAGE FACILITY MONITORING In accordance with the DCPP Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM), the Old Steam Generator Storage Facility (OSGSF) sumps were inspected quarterly.
If water was found in the sump of a vault containing plant equipment, the expectation was to sample that sump water and dispose of the water per plant protocols via an approved discharge pathway.For reference, the following equipment was placed into this OSGSF on the following dates:* 3/2/08 (outage 2R14), four DCPP Unit Two (U-2) Steam Generators
* 2/14/09 (outage 1R15), four DCPP Unit One (U-I) Steam Generators
* 11/6/09 (outage 2R15), one DCPP Unit Two (U-2) Reactor (Rx) Head& 10/23/10 (outage 1R16), one DCPP Unit One (U-l) Rx Head As of 12/31/11, the OSGSF contains eight old Steam Generators and two old Rx Heads.S The OSGSF sumps were inspected quarterly by REMP personnel.
During the first quarter of 2011, rainwater in-leakage was found within the U-I old Rx Head vault # 28 and U-2 Old Steam Generator vault # 30 sumps.This sump water had tritium concentrations of 2,000 to 34,000 pCi/Liter due to diffusion of tritium from the stored equipment, into the OSGSF air, and subsequent diffusion from the air into the stagnant sump water. This tritium concentration phenomenon was communicated to the rest of the industry.The rainwater from the sumps was removed and processed via an approved DCPP radwaste discharge pathway.Construction repairs were made to the OSGSF to prevent rainwater from entering the OSGSF.Specific repairs involved OSGSF vertical wall crack repairs and installation of roof gutters around the east and south side of the OSGSF. These repairs have been successful for prevention of rainwater intrusion into the OSGSF. These OSGSF sumps remained dry in 2011.0 S S S S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S S 0 S 0 0 S S S S 0 0 S S S 0 0 0 Page Intentionally Blank 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S S S S S S S S S S S S S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Laborato ries LLC 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT FOR THE RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM (REMP)GEL LABORATORIES, LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 843.556.8171 0 Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 2 of 58 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT FOR THE RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM (REMP)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m1w9jlk-Prepared By:.Approved By: Martha J. Harrison Quality Assurance Officer Robert L. Pullano Director, Quality Systems March 2. 2012 Date March 2, 2012 Date S*Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 3 of 58*TABLE OF CONTENTS S 1. IN T R O D U C T IO N ......................................................................................................................
5*2. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMS FOR INTER-LABORATORY, INTRA-LABORATORY
* AND THIRD PARTY CROSS-CHECK
..................................................................................
6 3. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM FOR INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL AUDITS ........ 7 4. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE ANALYSIS ...... ................................................
8 0 5. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SAMPLES .....................................................................
8 6. QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE ANALYSIS ........ 8 7. SUM MARY O F DATA RESULTS .......................................................................................
9 8.
 
==SUMMARY==
OF PARTICIPATION IN THE ECKERT & ZIEGLER ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM .......................................
10 9.
 
==SUMMARY==
OF PARTICIPATION IN THE MAPEP MONITORING PROGRAM ..............
10*10.
 
==SUMMARY==
OF PARTICIPATION IN THE ERA MRAD PT PROGRAM ..............
10 11.
 
==SUMMARY==
OF PARTICIPATION IN THE ERA PT PROGRAM ...........................
11 12. CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUEST AND REPORT (CARR) .........................................
11 13 .R E F E R E N C E S ....................................................................................................................
12 SA P P E N D IX 1 ........................................................................................................................
..58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 4 of 58 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) 0 TABLES 0 Table 1 Radiological Proficiency Testing Results and Acceptance Criteria ........................
13 Table 2 Eckert & Ziegler Analytics Performance Evaluation Results ...................................
24 0 Table 3 Department of Energy Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP)R esults ...................................................................................................................................
.26an S Table 4 ERA Program Performance Evaluation Results ...................................................
30 Table 5 ERA Program (MRAD) Performance Evaluation Results ......................................
32 0 Table 6 Corrective Action Report Summary ......................................................................
45 S 0 FIGURES F Figure 1 Cobalt-60 Performance Evaluation Results and % Bias ....................................
36 F Figure 2 Cesium-137 Performance Evaluation Results and % Bias ...................................
37 Figure 3 Tritium Performance Evaluation Results and % Bias ..........................................
38 Figure 4 Strontium-90 Performance Evaluation Results and % Bias ................................
394 F Figure 5 Gross Alpha Performance Evaluation Results and % Bias ..................
0..... 43 Figure 6 Gross Beta Performance Evaluation Results and % Bias ..................
1..... 04 0 Figure 7 Iodine-I131 Performance Evaluation Results and % Bias...............................
.42 Figure 8 Americium-241 Performance Evaluation Results and % Bias..........................
.43 Figure 9 Plutonium-238 Performance Evaluation Results and % Bias..........................
.44 0 S S 0 S 0 0 0
*Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417* 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 5 of 58*2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT FOR THE RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM (REMP)0 1. Introduction GEL Laboratories, LLC (GEL) is a privately owned environmental laboratory dedicated to providing personalized client services of the highest quality. GEL was established as an*I analytical testing laboratory in 1981. Now a full service lab, our analytical divisions use state of the art equipment and methods to provide a comprehensive array of organic, inorganic, and radiochemical analyses to meet the needs of our clients.At GEL, quality is emphasized at every level of personnel throughout the company.Management's ongoing commitment to good professional practice and to the quality of our 0testing services to our customers is demonstrated by their dedication of personnel and 5resources to develop, implement, assess, and improve our technical and management operations.
The purpose of GEL's quality assurance program is to establish policies, procedures, and processes to meet or exceed the expectations of our clients. To achieve this, all personnel that 0support these services to our clients are introduced to the program and policies during their initial orientation, and annually thereafter during company-wide training sessions.0GEL's primary goals are to ensure that all measurement data generated are scientifically and*legally defensible, of known and acceptable quality per the data quality objectives (DQOs), and thoroughly documented to provide sound support for environmental decisions.
In addition, 0GEL continues to ensure compliance with all contractual requirements, environmental 51 standards, and regulations established by local, state and federal authorities.
*GEL administers the QA program in accordance with the Quality Assurance Plan, GL-QS-B-*001. Our Quality Systems include all quality assurance (QA) policies and quality control (QC)procedures necessary to plan, implement, and assess the work we perform. GEL's QA*Program establishes a quality management system (QMS) that governs all of the activities of 5! our organization.
0This report entails the quality assurance program for the proficiency testing and environmental
*monitoring aspects of GEL for 2011. GEL's QA Program is designed to monitor the quality of analytical processing associated with environmental, radiobioassay, effluent (10 CFR Part 50),*and waste (10 CFR Part 61) sample analysis.0 This report covers the category of Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) and 5includes:
0** Intra-laboratory QC results analyzed during 2011.0 Inter-laboratory QC results analyzed during 2011 where known values were available.
0 S 0 S S S I Laboratories LLC 0 0 P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 0 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 6 of 58 0 2. Quality Assurance Programs for Inter-laboratory, Intra-laboratory and Third Party 0 Cross-Check In addition to internal and client audits, our laboratory participates in annual performance 0 evaluation studies conducted by independent providers.
We routinely participate in the following types of performance audits: " Proficiency testing and other inter-laboratory comparisons" Performance requirements necessary to retain Certifications" Evaluation of recoveries of certified reference and in-house secondary reference materials using statistical process control data.* Evaluation of relative percent difference between measurements through SPC data.We also participate in a number of proficiency testing programs for federal and state agencies and as required by contracts.
It is our policy that no proficiency evaluation samples be analyzed in any special manner. Our annual performance evaluation participation generally includes a combination of studies that support the following: " US Environmental Protection Agency Discharge Monitoring Report, Quality Assurance Program (DMR-QA).
Annual national program sponsored by EPA for laboratories 0 engaged in the analysis of samples associated with the NPDES monitoring program.Participation is mandatory for all holders of NPDES permits. The permit holder must analyze for all of the parameters listed on the discharge permit. Parameters include 0 general chemistry, metals, BOD/COD, oil and grease, ammonia, nitrates, etc.* Department of Energy Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP). A 0 semiannual program developed by DOE in support of DOE contractors performing waste analyses.
Participation is required for all laboratories that perform environmental 0 analytical measurements in support of environmental management activities.
This program includes radioactive isotopes in water, soil, vegetation and air filters. 0" ERA's MRAD-Multimedia Radiochemistry Proficiency test program. This program is for labs seeking certification for radionuclides in wastewater and solid waste. The program 0 is conducted in strict compliance with USEPA National Standards for Water Proficiency study.* ERA's InterLaB RadCheM Proficiency Testing Program for radiological analyses.
This program completes the process of replacing the USEPA EMSL-LV Nuclear Radiation Assessment Division program discontinued in 1998. Laboratories seeking certification 0 for radionuclide analysis in drinking water also use the study. This program is conducted in strict compliance with the USEPA National Standards for Water Proficiency Testing Studies. This program encompasses Uranium by EPA method 0 200.8 (for drinking water certification in Florida/Primary NELAP), gamma emitters, Gross Alpha/Beta, Iodine-1 31, naturally occurring radioactive isotopes, Strontium-89/90, and Tritium.0" ERA's Water Pollution (WP) biannual program for waste methodologies includes parameters for both organic and inorganic analytes.0 0 0 0 0
* Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417* 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 7 of 58* .ERA's Water Supply (WS) biannual program for drinking water methodologies includes parameters for organic and inorganic analytes.0 .Environmental Cross-Check Program administered by Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc.0 This program encompasses radionuclides in water, soil, milk, naturally occurring radioactive isotopes in soil and air filters.0GEL procures single-blind performance evaluation samples from Eckert & Ziegler Analytics to verify the analysis of sample matrices processed at GEL. Samples are received on a quarterly basis. GEL's Third-Party Cross-Check Program provides environmental matrices encountered
*D in a typical nuclear utility REMP. The Third-Party Cross-Check Program is intended to meet or exceed the inter-laboratory comparison program requirements discussed in NRC Regulatory Guide 4.15, revision 1. Once performance evaluation samples have been prepared in SD accordance with the instructions provided by the PT provider, samples are managed and analyzed in the same manner as environmental samples from GEL's clients.03. Quality Assurance Program for Internal and External Audits During each annual reporting period, at least one internal assessment is conducted in 0accordance with the pre-established schedule from Standard Operating Procedure for the Conduct of Quality Audits, GL-QS-EO01.
The annual internal audit plan is reviewed for adequacy and includes the scheduled frequency and scope of quality control actions necessary S to GEL's QA program. Internal audits are conducted at least annually in accordance with a schedule approved by the Quality Systems Director.
Supplier audits are contingent upon the categorization of the supplier, and may or may not be conducted prior to the use of a supplier 0 or subcontractor.
Type I suppliers and subcontractors, regardless of how they were initially qualified, are re-evaluated at least once every three years.S In addition, prospective customers audit GEL during pre-contract audits. GEL hosts several external audits each year for both our clients and other programs.
These programs include environmental monitoring, waste characterization, and radiobioassay.
The following list of Sprograms may audit GEL at least annually or up to every three years depending on the 5 program.* .NELAC, National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program*0 DOECAP, U.S. Department of Energy Consolidated Audit Program ,, DOELAP, U.S. Department of Energy Laboratory Accreditation Program* DOE QSAS, U.S. Department of Energy, Quality Systems for Analytical Services*
* ISO/IEC 17025* A2LA, American Association for Laboratory Accreditation 0 DOD ELAP, US Department of Defense Environmental Accreditation Program 0 NUPIC, Nuclear Procurement Issues Committee*
* South Carolina Department of Heath and Environmental Control (SC DHEC)The annual radiochemistry laboratory internal audit (11-RAD-001) was conducted in March*2011. Two (2) findings, three (3) observations, and four (4) recommendations resulted from this assessment.
In April 2011, each finding was closed and appropriate laboratory staff addressed each observation and recommendation.
0 Laboratories LLC 0 P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 8 of 58 The Nuclear Procurement Issues Committee (NUPIC) audit was conducted on November 14, 2011 through November 18, 2011. This Duke Energy/NUPIC QA audit was performed for the activities and/or documentation/records associated with GEL Laboratories supplying general chemistry, radiochemistry and bioassay analytical services.
This audit found that the GEL Laboratories quality system is well documented and/or implemented, and is acceptable.
With the exception of the six (6) audit findings, all of the requirements of GEL Laboratories Quality Assurance Plan audited were found to be satisfactorily implemented, and therefore, 0"Continued approval of GEL Laboratories as an Appendix B supplier of general chemistry, radiochemistry and bioassay analytical services is recommended." 0 All responses to the six findings have been adequately addressed by GEL. The Audit Report #22837-A for Supplier Number 5644 has been posted on the NUPIC website.4. Performance Evaluation Acceptance Criteria for Environmental Sample Analysis GEL utilized an acceptance protocol based upon two performance models. For those inter-laboratory programs that already have established performance criteria for bias (i.e., MAPEP, and ERA/ELAP), GEL will utilize the criteria for the specific program. For intra-laboratory or third party quality control programs that do not have a specific acceptance criteria (i.e. the Eckert-Ziegler Analytics Environmental Cross-check Program), results will be evaluated in accordance with GEL's internal acceptance criteria.5. Performance Evaluation Samples Performance Evaluation (PE) results and internal quality control sample results are evaluated in accordance with GEL acceptance criteria.
The first criterion concerns bias, which is defined as the deviation of any one result from the known value. The second criterion concerns precision, which deals with the ability of the measurement to be replicated by comparison of an individual result with the mean of all results for a given sample set.At GEL, we also evaluate our analytical performance on a regular basis through statistical 0 process control (SPC) acceptance criteria.
Where feasible, this criterion is applied to both measures of precision and accuracy and is specific to sample matrix. We establish environmental process control limits at least annually.For Radiochemistry analysis, quality control evaluation is based on static limits rather than those that are statistically derived. Our current process control limits are maintained in GEL's AlphaLIMS.
We also measure precision with matrix duplicates and/or matrix spike duplicates.
The upper and lower control limits (UCL and LCL respectively) for precision are plus or minus three times the standard deviation from the mean of a series of relative percent differences.
The static precision criteria for radiochemical analyses are 0 -20%, for activity levels exceeding 0 the contract required detection limit (CRDL).6. Quality Control Program for Environmental Sample Analysis GEL's internal QA Program is designed to include QC functions such as instrumentation calibration checks (to insure proper instrument response), blank samples, instrumentation backgrounds, duplicates, as well as overall staff qualification analyses and statistical process controls.
Both quality control and qualification analyses samples are used to be as similar as 0 0 0 0
*e I Laboratories LLC 0 P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417* 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 9 of 58*the matrix type of those samples submitted for analysis by the various laboratory clients. These performance test samples, (or performance evaluation samples) are either actual sample submitted in duplicate in order to evaluate the precision of laboratory measurements, or fortified blank samples, which have been given a known quantity of a radioisotope that is in the interest*! to GEL's clients.Accuracy (or Bias) is measured through laboratory control samples and/or matrix spikes, as well as surrogates and internal standards.
The UCLs and LCLs for accuracy are plus or minus three times the standard deviation from the mean of a series of recoveries.
The static limit for radiochemical analyses is 75 -125%. Specific instructions for out-of-control situations are*provided in the applicable analytical SOP.GEL's Laboratory Control Standard (LCS) is an aliquot of reagent water or other blank matrix to*which known quantities of the method analytes are added in the laboratory.
The LCS is analyzed exactly like a sample, and its purpose is to determine whether the methodology is in control, and whether the laboratory is capable of making accurate and precise measurements.
*Some methods may refer to these samples as Laboratory Fortified Blanks (LFB). The requirement for recovery is between 75 and 125% for radiological analyses excluding drinking 0water matrix.0* Bias (%) = (observed concentration)
* 100 %(known concentration)
Precision is a data quality indicator of the agreement between measurements of the same property, obtained under similar conditions, and how well they conform to themselves.
0Precision is usually expressed as standard deviation, variance or range in either absolute or relative (percentage) terms.* GEL's laboratory duplicate (DUP or LCSD) is an aliquot of a sample taken from the same container and processed in the same manner under identical laboratory conditions.
The aliquot is analyzed independently from the parent sample and the results are compared to measure 0precision and accuracy.If a sample duplicate is analyzed, it will be reported as Relative Percent Difference (RPD). The* RPD must be 20 percent or less, if both samples are greater than 5 times the MDC. If both results are less than 5 times MDC, then the RPD must be equal to or less than 100%. If one result is above the MDC and the other is below the MDC, then the RPD can be calculated using the MDC for the result of the one below the MDC. The RPD must be 100% or less. In the situation where both results are above the MDC but one result is greater than 5 times the MDC and the other is less than 5 times the MDC, the RPD must be less than or equal to 20%. If both*results are below MDC, then the limits on % RPD are not applicable.
Difference
(%) = (high duplicate result -low duplicate result)
* 100 %(average of results)7. Summary of Data Results 0 During 2011, forty-three radioisotopes associated with seven matrix types were analyzed under GEL's Performance Evaluation program in participation with ERA, MAPEP, and Eckert &0 0 S 0 0 Laboratories LLC 0 P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 10 of 58 0 Ziegler Analytics.
Matrix types were representative of client analyses performed during 2011. 0 The list below contains the type of matrix evaluated by GEL. 0* Air Filter 0* Cartridge* Water* Milk*Soil0* Liquid* Vegetation Graphs are provided in Figures 1-9 of this report to allow for the evaluation of trends or biases.These graphs include radioisotopes Cobalt-60, Cesium-137, Tritium, Strontium-90, Gross Alpha, Gross Beta, Iodine-131, Americium-241, and Plutonium-238.
: 8. Summary of Participation in the Eckert & Ziegler Analytics Environmental Cross-Check Program 0 Eckert & Ziegler Analytics provided samples for 89 individual environmental analyses.
The accuracy of each result reported to Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc. is measured by the ratio of GEL's result to the known value. Of the 89 analyses, 98% (87 out of 89) of all results fell within 0 GEL's acceptance criteria.
Two analytical failures occurred with the analysis of Chromium-51 in water and Strontium-90 in milk.For the corrective actions associated with these failures, refer to CARR1 10912-626 and CARR1 11129-644 (Table 6).9. Summary of Participation in the MAPEP Monitoring Program MAPEP Series 23, 24 and 25 were analyzed by the laboratory.
Of the 167 analyses, 94% (157 0 out of 167) of all results fell within the PT provider's acceptance criteria.
Ten analytical failures 0 occurred:
Plutonium-238 in soil, Plutonium-239/240 in soil, Plutonium-238 in water, Gross Alpha in filter, Iron-55 in soil, Iron-55 in water, Gross Alpha in filter, Gross Beta in filter, 0 Plutonium-239/240 in filter, and Uranium-238 in filter.For the corrective actions associated with MAPEP Series 23, 24 and 25, refer to CARR1 01122- 0 526, CARR110107-533, CARR110705-12, CARR110809-618, CARR111219-653, and CARR1 20118-659 (Table 6).10. Summary of Participation in the ERA MRaD PT Program The ERA MRad program provided samples (MRAD-14 and MRAD-15) for 176 individual 0 environmental analyses.
Of the 176 analyses, 97% (170 out of 176) of all results fell within the 0 PT provider's acceptance criteria.
Six analytical failures occurred:
Cesium-134 in soil, Americium-241 in soil, Gross Alpha in filter, Gross Beta in filter, Iron-55 in water, and Lead-214 0 in soil.For the corrective actions associated with MRAD 14 and MRAD-1 5, refer to corrective actions 0 CARR1 10603-600 and CARR1 11129-645 (Table 6).0 0 0 0
* M I Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 11 of 58*11. Summary of Participation in the ERA PT Program S The ERA program provided samples (RAD-84, RAD-86, RAD-87 and RAD-800) for 69individual environmental analyses.
Of the 69 analyses, 96% (66 out of 69) of all results fell within the PT provider's acceptance criteria.
Three analytical failures occurred:
Barium-133 in*water, Zinc-65 in soil, and 1-131 in water.For the corrective actions associated with RAD-84 and RAD-86, refer to corrective actions CARR1 10307-548, CARRI 10812-621, and CARR1 10912-628 (Table 6).*12. Corrective Action Request and Report (CARR)There are two categories of corrective action at GEL. One is corrective action implemented at the analytical and data review level in accordance with the analytical SOP. The other is formal corrective action documented by the Quality Systems Team in accordance with GL-QS-E-002.
A formal corrective action is initiated when a nonconformance reoccurs or is so significant that 0 permanent elimination or prevention of the problem is required.0GEL includes quality requirements in most analytical standard operating procedures to ensure 9 that data are reported only if the quality control criteria are met or the quality control measures 0that did not meet the acceptance criteria are documented.
A formal corrective action is implemented according to GL-QS-E-002 for Conducting Corrective/Preventive Action and* Identifying Opportunities for Improvement.
Recording and documentation is performed* following guidelines stated in GL-QS-E-012 for Client NCR Database Operation.
0 Any employee at GEL can identify and report a nonconformance and request that corrective 0action be taken. Any GEL employee can participate on a corrective action team as requested by the QS team or Group Leaders. The steps for conducting corrective action are detailed in* GL-QS-E-002.
In the event that correctness or validity of the laboratory's test results in doubt, the laboratory will take corrective action. If investigations show that the results have been impacted, affected clients will be informed of the issue in writing within five (5) calendar days of*the discovery.
0 Table 6 provides the status of CARRs for radiological performance testing during 2011.0 S 0 S S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S~ Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 12 of 58 13. References 0 1. GEL Quality Assurance Plan, GL-QS-B-001
: 2. GEL Standard Operating Procedure for the Conduct of Quality Audits, GL-QS-E-001
: 3. GEL Standard Operating Procedure for Conducting Corrective/Preventive Action and Identifying Opportunities for Improvement, GL-QS-E-002
: 4. GEL Standard Operating Procedure for AlphaLIMS Documentation of Nonconformance Reporting and Dispositioning and Control of Nonconforming Items, GL-QS-E-004 0 5. GEL Standard Operating Procedure for Handling Proficiency Evaluation Samples, GL-QS- 0 E-013 6. GEL Standard Operating Procedure for Quality Assurance Measurement Calculations and Processes, GL-QS-E-014
: 7. 40 CFR Part 136 Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants
: 8. ISO/IEC 17025-2005, General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories
: 9. ANSI/ASQC E4-1994, Specifications and Guidelines for Quality Systems for Environmental Data Collection and Environmental Technology Programs, American National Standard 10. 2003 NELAC Standard, National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program 11. MARLAP, Multi-Agency Radiological Laboratory Analytical Protocols 5 12. 10 CFR Part 21, Reporting of Defects and Noncompliance
: 13. 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix B, Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants and Fuel Reprocessing Plants 5 14. 10 CFR Part 61, Licensing Requirements for Land Disposal and Radioactive Waste 10 15. NRC REG Guide 4.15 and NRC REG Guide 4.8 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 0 S ILaboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 13 of 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 TABLE 1 2011 RADIOLOGICAL PROFICIENCY TESTING RESULTS AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA Quarter I Analysis Sample GEL Known Acceptance Year Date Sample Number Media Unit Analyte I Nuclide Value value Range/ Ratio Evaluation Not 1 st / 2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Barium-133 58.4 52.3 43.1 -57.9 Acceptable 1st/2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Cesium-134 53.0 56.2 45.4-61.8 Acceptable 1 st / 2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Cesium-137 103 100 90.0 -112 Acceptable 1 st / 2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Cobalt-60 73.2 68.9 62.0 -78.2 Acceptable 1st/ 2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 166 153 138- 180 Acceptable 1st /2011 02/18111 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Gross Alpha 65.1 62.5 32.7 -77.5 Acceptable 1st/2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Gross Beta 54.4 51.9 35.3-58.9 Acceptable 1st / 2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Gross Alpha 51.2 62.5 32.7 -77.5 Acceptable I st / 2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Radium-226 8.06 8.26 6.21 -9.71 Acceptable 1 st / 2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Radium-228 7.4 7.35 4.64-9.40 Acceptable 1st / 2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Uranium (Nat) 46.1 45.6 37.0- 50.7 Acceptable 1st/2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water uglL Uranium (Nat) mass 69.6 66.5 53.9-74.0 Acceptable 1st / 2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Radium-226 9.68 8.26 6.21 -9.71 Acceptable 1 st / 2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Radium-228 6.41 7.35 4.64 -9.40 Acceptable 1st / 2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Uranium (Nat) 45.3 45.6 37.0-50.7 Acceptable 1st/2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water ug/L Uranium (Nat) mass 67.6 66.5 53.9-74.0 Acceptable 1 st / 2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Tritium 2930 3460 2930 -3820 Acceptable 1 st / 2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Strontium-89 48.9 55.3 44.1 -62.9 Acceptable 1st / 2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Strontium-90 27 33.1 24.2- 38.3 Acceptable 1st / 2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Strontium-89 55.3 55.3 44.1 -62.9 Acceptable 1st / 2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Strontium-90 29.3 33.1 24.2-38.3 Acceptable 1st / 2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Iodine-131 29 26.8 22.3-31.5 Acceptable 1st / 2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Iodine-131 23.9 26.8 22.3-31.5 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaS23 Soil Bq/kg Americium-241 63.27 87 61-113 Acceptable 1 st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaS23 Soil Bq/kg Cesium-134 924 940 658-1222 Acceptable 1 st / 2011 11/10110 MAPEP-10-MaS23 Soil Bq/kg Cesium-137 685 670 469 -871 Acceptable 1 st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaS23 Soil Bq/kg Cobalt-60 360 343 240-246 Acceptable 1 st /2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaS23 Soil Bq/kg Iron-55 1120 1333 933- 1733 Acceptable 1 st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaS23 Soil Ba/kg Manganese-54 875.3 820 574- 1066 Acceptable 1st /2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaS23 Soil Bq/kg Nickel-63 901.3 1058 741 -1375 Acceptable Not 1 st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaS23 Soil Bq/kg Plutonium-238 12.4 64 45-83 Acceptable Not 1 st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-1 0-MaS23 Soil Bq/kg Plutonium-239/240 21.87 71 50 -92 Acceptable 1 st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaS23 Soil Bq/kg Potassium-40 774 699 489-909 Acceptable 1 st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaS23 Soil Bq/kg Technetium-99 272.3 325 228 -423 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaS23 Soil Bq/kg Uranium-234/233 266.33 278 195-361 Acceptable 1 st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaS23 Soil Bq/kg Uranium-238 171 143 83.6 -210 Acceptable 1st/2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaS23 Soil Bq/kg Zinc-65 301 265 186-345 Acceptable 1 st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaW23 Water Bq/L Cesium-1 34 31.4 31.4 22.0 -40.8 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaW23 Water Bq/L Cesium-1 37 45.5 44.2 30.9 -57.5 Acceptable 1st/2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaW23 Water Bq/L Cobalt-57 36.53 36.0 25.2-46.8 Acceptable 1st/2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaW23 Water Bq/L Cobalt-60 29.10 28.3 19.8-36.38 Acceptable I Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 14 of 58 Quarter /V..r Analysis rna..Sample u-Ill.GEL Vol...Known v~hla Acceptance RonnaI Rotfin iI Ini An~lha. I M,.~ll.I.FvAI~iatinn 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaW23 Water Bq/L Hydrogen-3 429.30 453.4 317.4 -589.4 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaW23 Water Bq/L Iron-55 61.43 60.2 42.1 -78.3 Acceptable lst/2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaW23 Water Bq/L Nickel-63 50 56.10 39.3-72.9 Acceptable Not 1st/2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaW23 Water Bq/L Plutonium-238 0.866 1.81 1.27-2.35 Acceptable 1 st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaW23 Water Bq/L Plutonium-239/240 1.22 1.35 0.95- 1.76 Acceptable Ist / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaW23 Water Bq/L Potassium-40 42.3 38.9 27.2-50.6 Acceptable 1 st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaW23 Water Bq/L Strontium-90 7.03 8.3 5.8 -10.8 Acceptable 1st /2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaW23 Water Bq/L Technetium-99 33.3 33.6 23.5-43.7 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaW23 Water Bq/L Uranium-234/233 1.937 2.01 1.41 -2.61 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaW23 Water Bq/L Uranium-238 2.043 2.07 1.45- 2.69 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaW23 Water Bq/L Zinc-65 34.77 31.0 21.7-40.3 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-GrW23 Water Bq/L Gross Alpha 1.67 1.92 0.58-3.26 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-1 0-GrW23 Water Bq/L Gross Beta 4.407 4.39 2.20-6.59 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RaF23 Filter ug/sample Uranium-235 0.0764 0.074 0.052 -0.096 Acceptable 1st/2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RaF23 Filter ug/sample Uranium-238 10.5 10.2 7.1 -13.3 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RaF23 Filter ug/sample Uranium-Total 10.9 10.3 7.2-13.4 Acceptable 1st /2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RaF23 Filter Bq/sample Americium-241 0.0917 0.115 0.081 -0.150 Acceptable 1 st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RaF23 Filter Bq/sample Cesium-1 34 2.95 2.98 2.09 -3.87 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RaF23 Filter Bq/sample Cobalt-57 4.06 4.08 2.86-5.30 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RaF23 Filter Bq/sample Cobalt-60 2.97 2.92 2.04- 3.80 Acceptable 1 st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RaF23 Filter Bq/sample Manganese-54 3.347 3.18 2.23-4.13 Acceptable 1 st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RaF23 Filter Bq/sample Plutonium-238 0.049 0.0489 0.0342-0.0336 Acceptable 1 st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RaF23 Filter Bq/sample Plutonium-239/240 0.076 0.082 0.057 -0.107 Acceptable I st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RaF23 Filter Bq/sample Strontium-90 0.854 1.01 0.71 -1.31 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RaF23 Filter Bq/sample Uranium-234/233 0.124 0.122 0.085 -0.159 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RaF23 Filter Bq/sample Uranium-238 0.122 0.127 0.089 -0.165 Acceptable 1 st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-GrF23 Filter Bq/sample Gross Beta 0.525 0.5 0.25-0.75 Acceptable lst/2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-GrF23 Filter Bq/sample Gross Beta 106 109 82.2-140 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RdV23 Vegetation Bq/sample Americium-241 0.210 0.270 0.189 -0.351 Acceptable 1st /2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RdV23 Vegetation Bq/sample Cesium-134 4.485 4.79 3.35-6.23 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RdV23 Vegetation Bq/sample Cesium-137 4.759 5.88 4.12-7.64 Acceptable 1 st 12011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RdV23 Vegetation Bq/sample Cobalt-57 9.389 8.27 5.79- 10.75 Acceptable 1 st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RdV23 Vegetation Bq/sample Manganese-54 7.34 6.287 4.401 -8.173 Acceptable Ist / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RdV23 Vegetation Bq/sample Plutonium-238 0.258 0.221 0.155 -0.287 Acceptable 1 st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RdV23 Vegetation Bq/sample Strontium-90 2.790 2.63 1.84- 3.42 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RdV23 Vegetation Bq/sample Uranium-234/233 0.392 0.320 0.224 -0.416 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RdV23 Vegetation Bq/sample Uranium-238 0.405 0.330 0.231 -0.429 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RdV23 Vegetation Bq/sample Zinc-65 6.630 5.39 3.77-7.01 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/03/11 040511 P Water pCi/L Strontium-89 57.9 68.1 55.4 -76.2 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/03/11 040511 P Water pCi/L Strontium-90 32.4 29.9 21.8-34.7 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 04/05/11 GENE01-11-MaWR3 Water Bq/L Plutonium-238 1.1 1.16 0.81 -1.51 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 04/05/11 GENE01-11-MaWR3 Water Bq/L Plutonium-239/240 0.8 0.85 0.60- 1.11 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 04/05/11 GENE01-11-RdFR1 Water Bq/sample Plutonium-238 0.00737 0.00836 .00585-.01087 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 04/05/11 GENE01-11-RdFR1 Water Bq/sample Plutonium-239/240 0.00481 0.00670 .00469-.00871 Acceptable 1st /2011 01/11/11 E7468-278 Water pCi/L Iodine-131 9.73E+01 9.40E+01 1.04 Acceptable 1st /2011 01/11/11 E7468-278 Water pCVL Chromium-51 2.16E+02 1.96E+02 1.10 Acceptable 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 15 of 58 Quarter I Analysis fl2ta~mmnI~ Muimhar Sample MarliI=GEL Vn l. i Known Acceptance D..ls .1 0.41 Unit Annluto I  Year Date Samlen~n Numberv Median Va, Wlue au ~~lliln 1st /2011 01/11/11 E7468-278 Water pCi/L Cesium-137 1.47E+02 1.35E+02 1.09 Acceptable 1st /2011 01/11/11 E7468-278 Water pCi/L Cobalt-58 7.71E+01 7.44E+01 1.04 Acceptable 1st /2011 01/11/11 E7468-278 Water pCi/L Manganese-54 1.88E+02 1.75E+02 1.08 Acceptable 1st /2011 01/11/11 E7468-278 Water pCi/L Iron-59 1.26E+02 1.15E+02 1.10 Acceptable 1st /2011 01/11111 E7468-278 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 1.90E+02 1.72E+02 1.11 Acceptable 1st 12011 01/11/11 E7468-278 Water pCi/L Cobalt-60 1.14E+02 1.13E+02 1.01 Acceptable 1 st /2011 01/11/11 E7466-278 Milk pCi/L Strontium-89 9,23E+01 9.74E+01 0.95 Acceptable 1st /2011 01/11/11 E7466-278 Milk pCi/L Strontium-90 1.27E+01 1.58E+01 0.80 Acceptable 1 st /2011 01/11/11 E7467-278 Milk pCi/L Iodine-131 1.OOE+02 9.69E+01 1.03 Acceptable 1st /2011 01/11/11 E7467-278 Milk pCi/L Chromium-51 3.27E+02 2.98E+02 1.10 Acceptable 1 st /2011 01/11/11 E7467-278 Milk pCi/L Cesium-134 1.19E+02 1.30E+02 0.91 Acceptable 1st /2011 01/11/11 E7467-278 Milk pCi/L Cesium-137 2.20E+02 2.05E+02 1.07 Acceptable 1st /2011 01/11/11 E7467-278 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-58 1.18E+02 1.13E+02 1.04 Acceptable 1st /2011 01/11/11 E7467-278 Milk pCi/L Manganese-54 2.78E+02 2.66E+02 1.04 Acceptable 1st /2011 01/11/11 E7467-278 Milk pCi/L Iron-59 1.94E+02 1.75E+02 1.11 Acceptable 1st /2011 01/11/11 E7467-278 Milk pCi/L Zinc-65 2.88E+02 2.61E+02 1.10 Acceptable 1st /2011 01/11/11 E7467-278 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-60 1.76E+02 1.72E+02 1.03 Acceptable 1 st /2011 01/11/11 E7465-278 Cartridge pCi Iodine-131 1.03E+02 9.47E+01 1.09 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Actinium-228 1290 1490 958 -2100 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Bismuth-212 1340 1400 368 -2090 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Bismuth-214 749 725 445- 1040 Acceptable Not 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Cesium-134 3240 2450 1580 -2950 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Cesium-137 2440 1920 1470-2490 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Cobalt-60 2850 2220 1620 -2980 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Lead-212 1160 1440 931 -2030 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Lead-214 848 805 482- 1200 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Manganese-54
<33.9 0.00 -Acceptable 2nd /2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Potassium-40 11400 11500 8320-15600 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Thorium-234 696 962 305- 1830 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Zinc-65 2670 1990 1580-2670 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Strontium-90 6570 7590 2740 -12400 Acceptable 2nd /2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-234 941 972 616-1210 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-238 776 962 588- 1220 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-Total 1754 1980 1130 -2670 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil ug/kg Uranium-Total(mass) 2314 2890 1590- 3640 Acceptable Not 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Americium-241 1260 914 546- 1170 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Plutonium-238 1500 1420 813 -2000 Acceptable 2nd /2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Plutonium-239 1540 1400 956-1860 Acceptable 2nd /2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-234 671 972 616-1210 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-238 783 962 588 -1220 Acceptable 2nd /2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-Total 1498 1980 1130 -2670 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil ug/kg Uranium-Total(mass) 2350 2890 1590 -3640 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil ug/kg Uranium-Total(mass) 1950 2890 1590-3640 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Vegetation pCi/kg Americium-241 3430 3200 1820-4400 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Vegetation pCi/kg Curium-244 829 812 400 -1260 Acceptable Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 16 of 58 Quarter / Analysis Vanr  Sample UwHI6 GEL VsIhuo Known Acceptance R~nnno R==tinNllmho~r Ilnit AnhAvf I N,.,-Iida F=vnI Imttinn 2nd / D2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Vegetation pCi/kg Plutonium-239 3000 3100 1920-4230 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Vegetation pCi/kg Uranium-234 2400 2610 1790- 3460 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Vegetation pCi/kg Uranium-238 2510 2590 1820- 3270 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Vegetation pCi/kg Uranium-Total 5032 5320 3660 -6860 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Vegetation ug/kg Uranium-Total(mass) 7530 7760 5340- 10000 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Vegetation pCi/kg Americium-241 3760 3200 1820- 4400 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Vegetation pCi/kg Cesium-134 829 770 441 -1070 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Vegetation pCi/kg Cesium-137 883 829 608- 1150 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Vegetation pCi/kg Cobalt-60 795 733 496- 1050 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Vegetation pCi/kg Manganese-54
<34.1 0.00 -- Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Vegetation pCi/kg Potassium-40 28300 25800 18500 -36500 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Vegetation pCi/kg Zinc-65 1020 799 577- 1090 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Vegetation pCi/kg Plutonium-238 2910 2990 1610-4380 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Vegetation pCi/kg Plutonium-239 3000 3100 1920-4230 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Vegetation pCi/kg Strontium-90 7400 7890 4410- 10500 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter pCi/Filter Americium-241 69.2 62.5 36.6 -85.7 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter pCi/Filter Plutonium-238 69.3 69.0 47.4 -90.7 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter pCi/Filter Plutonium-239 65.4 65.5 47.5 -84.8 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-234 60.3 61.5 38.7 -91.1 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-238 66.7 61.0 39.0- 86.6 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-Total 131.1 125 63.9 -199 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter ug/Filter Uranium-Total(mass) 200 183 114 -263 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter pCi/Filter Americium-241 74.9 62.5 36.6 -85.7 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter pCi/Filter Cesium-134 260 279 182-345 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter pCi/Filter Cesium-137 320 312 234- 410 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter pCi/Filter Cobalt-60 426 390 302-487 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter pCi/Filter Manganese-54
<4.6 0.00 -Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter pCi/Filter Zinc-65 318 279 193-386 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter pCi/Filter Strontium-90 192 185 81.4- 288 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter pCi/Filter Iron-55 391 385 169-599 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter ug/Filter Uranium-Total(mass) 185 183 114 -263 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-234 54.8 61.5 38.7-91.1 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-238 54.4 61.0 39.0- 86.6 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-Total 109 125 63.9- 199 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter ug/Filter Uranium-Total(mass) 177 183 114- 263 Acceptable Not 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter pCi/Filter Gross Alpha <5.00 74.3 38.5- 112 Acceptable Not 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter pCi/Filter Gross Beta 34.1 69.5 42.8-102 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Uranium-234 87.1 94.3 71.1-122 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Uranium-238 81.0 93.5 71.4-116 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCVL Uranium-Total 168.1 192 138-256 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water ug/L Uranium-Total(mass) 241 280 219-346 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Americium-241 137 135 92.5- 182 Acceptable 2nd/2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Plutonium-238 116 131 99.1 -162 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Plutonium-239 101 119 92.1 -147 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Uranium-234 88.5 94.3 71.1 -122 Acceptable 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 119 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MLaboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 17 of 58 S 0 0 0 Quarter I Analysis Year Date Sample Media GEL Value Known value Acceptance Ranael Ratio Samole Number Unit Analvte / Nuclide Evaluation 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Uranium-Total 180.7 192 138 -256 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water ug/L Uranium-Total(mass) 264 280 219-346 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Americium-241 140 135 92.5- 182 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Cesium-134 222 231 171 -265 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Cesium-137 430 417 354 -500 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Cobalt-60 430 411 358-486 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Manganese-54
<5.17 0.00 -- Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 131 111 94.1-138 Acceptable 2nd /2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Strontium-90 782 773 491 -1030 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Uranium-234 100 94.3 71.1-122 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Uranium-238 88.7 93.5 71.4- 116 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Uranium-Total 188.7 192 138 -256 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water ug/L Uranium-Total(mass) 264 280 219- 346 Acceptable Not 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Iron-55 245 437 254- 584 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Gross Alpha 99.7 112 49.7-166 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Gross Beta 103 99.8 58.4- 146 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Tritium 13300 15200 9900-22500 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 06/14/11 052011 J Water pCi/L Barium-133 76.6 75.3 63.0 -82.8 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 06/14/11 052011J Water pCi/L Cesium-134 71.3 72.9 59.5-80.2 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 06/14/11 052011J Water pCi/L Cesium-137 78.8 77.0 69.3-87.4 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 06/14/11 052011J Water pCi/L Cobalt-60 92.7 88.8 79.9- 100 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 06/14111 052011J Water pCi/L Zinc-65 118 98.9 89.0- 118 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7859-278 Cartridge pCi Iodine-131 8.17E+01 8.65E+01 0.95 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7860-278 Milk pCi/L Strontium-89 9.68E+01 1.03E+02 0.94 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7860-278 Milk pCi/L Strontium-90 1.58E+01 1,56E+01 1.01 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7861-278 Milk pCi/L Iodine-131 9.OOE+01 1.03E+02 0.87 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7861-278 Milk pCi/L Cerium-141 8.36E+01 7.99E+01 1.05 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7861-278 Milk pCi/L Chromium-51 2.39E+02 2.06E+02 1.16 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7861-278 Milk pCi/L Cesium-134 1.71 E+02 1.90E+02 0.90 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7861-278 Milk pCi/L Cesium-137 1.43E+02 1.38E+02 1.04 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7861-278 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-58 1.50E+02 1.52E+02 0.99 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7861-278 Milk pCi/L Manganese-54 1.32E+02 1.38E+02 0.96 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7861-278 Milk pCi/L Iron-59 1.43E+02 1.23E+02 1.16 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7861-278 Milk pCi/L Zinc-65 2.76E+02 2.61E+02 1.06 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7861-278 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-60 1.92E+02 1.95E+02 0.99 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7862-278 Water pCi/L lodine-131 1.20E+02 1.01E+02 1.19 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7862-278 Water pCi/L Cerium-141 9.30E+01 9.35E+01 0.99 Acceptable Not 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7862-278 Water pCi/L Chromium-51 3.36E+02 2.41 E+02 1.39 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7862-278 Water pCi/L Cesium-134 2.02E+02 2.22E+02 0.91 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7862-278 Water pCi/L Cesium-137 1.73E+02 1.61 E+02 1.07 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7862-278 Water pCi/L Cobalt-58 1.75E+02 1.77E+02 0.99 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7862-278 Water pCi/L Manganese-54 1.66E+02 1.61 E+02 1.03 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7862-278 Water pCi/L Iron-59 1.57E+02 1.44E+02 1.09 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7862-278 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 3.47E+02 3.05E+02 1.14 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7862-278 Water pCi/L Cobalt-60 2.38E+02 2.28E+02 1.05 Acceptable I Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 18 of 58 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 18of58 Quarter I Ysnr Analysis flato Sample MNrli12 GEL V.1l1.1 Known vI2lui Acceptance Rannol Ratio R2mnla Nmnmhmr llnit Anmlvto I N,.tlido Fvaluation 3rd / 2011 08/11/11 071111J Filter pCi/Filter Gross Beta 84.7 92.2 56.8 -92.2 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 08/11/11 07111 1J Soil pCi/kg Americium-241 2130 1660 992 -2130 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 08/11/11 071111J Soil pCi/kg Actinium-228 1300 1330 860- 1880 Acceptable 3rd /2011 08/11/11 071111J Soil pCi/kg Bismuth-212 1460 1550 406-2310 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 08/11/11 071111J Soil pCi/kg Bismuth-214 1430 1420 872 -2050 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 08/11111 071111J Soil pCi/kg Cesium-134 6000 5170 3330 -6220 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 08/11/11 071111J Soil pCi/kg Cesium-137 6190 4970 3800- 6460 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 08/11/11 071111J Soil pCi/kg Cobalt-60 9680 7520 5470 -10100 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 08/11/11 071111J Soil pCi/kg Lead-212 1300 1260 820-1780 Acceptable 3rd/2011 08/11/11 071111J Soil pCi/kg Lead-214 1700 1510 902- 2260 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 08/11/11 071111J Soil pCi/kg Manganese-54
<263 0.00 -Acceptable 3rd /2011 08/11/11 071111J Soil pCi/kg Potassium-40 10200 11200 8060-15100 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 08/11/11 071111J Soil pCi/kg Thorium-234 1460 1590 500 -3020 Acceptable Not 3rd / 2011 08/11/11 07111 1J Soil pCi/kg Zinc-65 2910 1940 1540- 2600 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 08/11/11 071111J Soil pCi/kg Strontium-90 8390 5750 2080-9380 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 08/11/11 071111J Water pCi/L Iron-55 426 588 342 -785 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 08/18/11 RAD-86 Water pCi/L Gross Alpha 44.2 71.5 37.6 -88.2 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 08/18/11 RAD-86 Water pCi/L Gross Beta 58.4 63.4 43.8 -70.0 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 08/18/11 RAD-86 Water pCi/L Gross Alpha 53.1 71.5 37.6 -88.2 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 08/18/11 RAD-86 Water pCi/L Tritium 7200 7620 6600 -8370 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 08/18/11 RAD-86 Water pCi/L Strontium-89 51.9 52.3 41.4-59.8 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 08/18/11 RAD-86 Water pCi/L Strontium-90 20.3 26.4 19.1 -30.8 Acceptable Not 3rd / 2011 08/18/11 RAD-86 Water pCi/L Iodine-1 31 35.4 26.0 21.6 -30.7 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 09/02/11 RAD-800 Water pCi/L Badum-1 33 55.3 51.6 42.5 -57.2 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 09/02/11 RAD-800 Water pCi/L Cesium-134 77.9 84.1 68.9-92.5 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 09/02/11 RAD-800 Water pCi/L Cesium-137 111 109 98.1 -122 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 09/02/11 RAD-800 Water pCi/L Cobalt-60 110 109 98.1 -122 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 09/02/11 RAD-800 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 63.4 52.8 46.3 -64.8 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 09/02/11 RAD-800 Water pCi/L Radium-226 14.3 14.6 10.9 -16.8 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 09/02/11 RAD-800 Water pCi/L Radium-228 12.6 13.2 8.75 -16.1 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 09/02/11 RAD-800 Water pCi/L Uranium (Nat) 50.7 51.2 41.6 -56.9 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 09/02/11 RAD-800 Water ug/L Uranium (Nat) mass 71.7 74.7 60.6 -83.0 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 09/02/11 RAD-800 Water pCi/L Radium-226 14.1 14.6 10.9-16.8 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 09/02/11 RAD-800 Water pCi/L Radium-228 12.5 13.2 8.75-16.1 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 09/02/11 RAD-800 Water pCi/L Uranium (Nat) 52.2 51.2 41.6 -56.9 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 09/02/11 RAD-800 Water ug/L Uranium (Nat) mass 77.9 74.7 60.6 -83.0 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-1 1-MaS24 Soil mg/kg Americium-241 64.93 61.1 42.8 -79.4 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-1 1-MaS24 Soil mg/kg Cesium-134 686.5 680 476 -884 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-1 1-MaS24 Soil mg/g Cesium-137 783 758 531 -985 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaS24 Soil mg/kg Cobalt-57 898.5 927 649 -1205 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaS24 Soil mg/kg Cobalt-60 493.5 482 337-627 Acceptable Not 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaS24 Soil mg/kg Iron-55 245 387 271 -503 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaS24 Soil mg/kg Nickel-63 440.3 582 407-757 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaS24 Soil mg/k Plutonium-239/240 90.87 98.0 68.6- 127.4 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaS24 Soil mg/kg Potassium-40 588 540 378- 702 Acceptable 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0* Laboratories LLC* P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417* 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 19 of 58 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Quarter I Analysis Year Date Sample Media GEL Value Known value Acceptance Range/ Ratio SamDle Number Unit Analvte / Nuclide Evaluation 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaS24 Soil mg/kg Uranium-234/233 175.33 176 123 -229 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaS24 Soil mg/kg Uranium-238 195.67 184 129 -239 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaS24 Soil mg/kg Zinc-65 1515 1359 951 -1767 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaW24 Water Bq/L Americium-241 0.4877 0.529 0.370 -0.688 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaW24 Water Bq/L Cesium-134 19.60 21.5 15.1 -28.0 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaW24 Water Bq/L Cesium-137 29.9 29.4 20.6- 38.2 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaW24 Water Bq/L Cobalt-60 24.75 24.6 17.2- 32.0 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaW24 Water Bq/L Hydrogen-3 225.3 243 170 -316 Acceptable Not 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaW24 Water Bq/L Iron-55 14.10 26.4 18.5-34.3 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaW24 Water Bq/L Manganese-54 32.9 31.6 22.1 -41.1 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaW24 Water Bq/L Nickel-63 19.2 18.6 13.0 -24.2 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaW24 Water Bq/L Plutonium-238 1.005 1.064 0.745 -1.383 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaW24 Water Bq/L Plutonium-239/240 0.755 0.809 0.566 -1.052 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaW24 Water Bq/L Potassium-40 99.8 91 64 -118 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaW24 Water Bq/L Strontium-90 8.05 8.72 6.10- 11.34 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaW24 Water B/qL Technetium-99 8.6 8.99 6.29 -11.69 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaW24 Water Bq/L Uranium-234/233 1.537 1.50 1.05 -1.95 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaW24 Water Bq/L Uranium-238 1.457 1.54 1.08- 2.00 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-GrW24 Water Bq/L Gross Alpha 1.019 1.136 0.341 -1.931 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-GrW24 Water Bq/L Gross Beta 3.140 2.96 1.48- 4.44 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdF24 Filter ug/sample Uranium-235 0.108 0.106 0.074 -0.138 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdF24 Filter ug/sample Uranium-238 14.4 14.9 10.4-19.4 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdF24 Filter ug/sample Uranium-Total 14.4 15.0 10.5- 19.5 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdF24 Filter Bq/sample Cesium-134 3.39 3.49 2.44 -4.54 Acceptable 3rd /2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdF24 Filter Bq/sample Cesium-137 2.375 2.28 1.60-2.96 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdF24 Filter Bq/sample Cobalt-57 3.60 3.33 2.33- 4.33 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-1 1-RdF24 Filter Bq/sample Manganese-54 2.975 2.64 1.85- 3.43 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdF24 Filter Bq/sample Plutonium-238 0.092 0.096 0.067 -0.125 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdF24 Filter Bg/sample Plutonium-239/240 0.073 0.0765 .0536 -.0995 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdF24 Filter Bq/sample Strontium-90 1.373 1.36 0.95- 1.77 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdF24 Filter Bq/sample Uranium-234/233 0.184 0.178 0.125 -0.231 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdF24 Filter Bq/sample Uranium-238 0.183 0.185 0.130 -0.241 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdF24 Filter Bq/sample Zinc-65 3.470 3.18 2.23-4.13 Acceptable Not 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-GrF24 Filter Bg/sample Gross Alpha 0.102 0.659 0.198 -1.120 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-1 1-GrF24 Filter Bq/sample Gross Beta 1.210 1.32 0.662 -1.985 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdV24 Vegetation Bq/sample Cesium-134 5.120 5.50 3.85-7.15 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdV24 Vegetation Bq/sample Cobalt-57 9.835 9.94 6.96- 12.92 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdV24 Vegetation Bq/sample Cobalt-60 5.060 4.91 3.44- 6.38 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdV24 Vegetation Bq/sample Manganese-54 6.405 6.40 4.48- 8.32 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdV24 Vegetation Bq/sample Plutonium-238 0.110 0.102 0.071 -0.133 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdV24 Vegetation Bq/sample Plutonium-239/240 0.1277 0.141 0.099 -0.183 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdV24 Vegetation Bq/sample Strontium-90 2.430 2.46 1.72- 3.20 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdV24 Vegetation Bq/sample Uranium-234/233 0.158 0.163 0.114 -0.212 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdV24 Vegetation Bq/sample Uranium-238 0.159 0.168 0.118 -0.218 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdV24 Vegetation Bq/sample Zinc-65 3.275 2.99 2.09- 3.89 Acceptable NLaboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 20 of 58 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 20 of 58 Quarter I Analysis flnta Sample Madlm GEL Known Acceptance Rannal RatinNmimhar Unit AnalvtA I Nm.elida Evaluation Yea Dat .... .... Valu ..........
Ra e Ratio .... ..i... .... ....o..... .. ...4th / 2011 10/25/11 RAD-87 Liquid pCi/L Iodine-131 28.7 27.5 22.9 -32.3 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 10/19/11 E8095-278 Cartridge pCi Iodine-131 7.69E+01 8.02E+01 0.96 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 10/19/11 E8096-278 Milk pCi/L Strontium-89 9.51E+01 9.08E+01 1.05 Acceptable Not 3rd / 2011 10/19/11 E8096-278 Milk pCi/L Strontium-90 8.49E+00 1.47E+01 0.58 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 10/19/11 E8097-278 Milk pCi/L Iodine-131 8.59E+01 8.92E+01 0.96 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 10/19/11 E8097-278 Milk pCi/L Cerium-141 6.59E+01 6.67E+01 0.99 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 10/19/11 E8097-278 Milk pCVL Chromium-51 2.18E+02 2.26E+02 0.96 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 10/19/11 E8097-278 Milk pCi/L Cesium-134 1.20E+02 1.28E+02 0.94 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 10/19/11 E8097-278 Milk pCi/L Cesium-1 37 1.23E+02 1.14E+02 1.08 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 10/19/11 E8097-278 Milk pCVL Cobalt-58 9.08E+01 9.75E+01 0.93 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 10/19/11 E8097-278 Milk pCi/L Manganese-54 1.57E+02 1.51 E+02 1.04 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 10/19/11 E8097-278 Milk pCi/L Iron-59 5.30E+01 5.48E+01 0.97 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 10/19/11 E8097-278 Milk pCi/L Zinc-65 1.88E+02 1.80E+02 1.04 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 10/19/11 E8097-278 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-60 1.51 E+02 1.57E+02 0.96 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 10/19/11 E8098-278 Water pCVL Iodine-1 31 7.23E+01 8.01E+01 0.9 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 10/19/11 E8098-278 Water pCi/L Cerium-141 9.06E+01 9.15E+01 0.99 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 10/19/11 E8098-278 Water pCi/L Chromium-51 3.19E+02 3.10E+02 1.03 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 10/19/11 E8098-278 Water pCi/L Cesium-134 1.57E+02 1.76E+02 0.89 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 10/19/11 E8098-278 Water pCi/L Cesium-1 37 1.60E+02 1.56E+02 1.03 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 10/19/11 E8098-278 Water pCi/L Cobalt-58 1.34E+02 1.34E+02 1.00 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 10/19/11 E8098-278 Water pCVL Manganese-54 2.19E+02 2.07E+02 1.06 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 10119/11 E8098-278 Water pCi/L Iron-59 9.04E+01 7.52E+01 1.20 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 10/19/11 E8098-278 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 2.74E+02 2.47E+02 1.11 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 10/19/11 E8098-278 Water pCi/L Cobalt-60 2.25E+02 2.15E+02 1.04 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-MaS25 Soil Bq/kg Cesium-137 990.5 979 685- 1273 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-MaS25 Soil Bq/kg Cobalt-57 1140 1180 826-1534 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-MaS25 Soil Bq/kg Cobalt-60 665.5 644 451 -837 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-MaS25 Soil Bq/kg Iron-55 1206.7 1000 700- 1300 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-1 1-MaS25 Soil Bq/kg Manganese-54 897.5 848 594 -1102 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-MaS25 Soil Bkg Plutonium-238 90.9 93.6 65.5- 121.7 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-MaS25 Soil Bq/kg Plutonium-239/240 76.6 77.4 54.2 -100.6 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-MaS25 Soil Bq/kg Potassium-40 692 625 438-813 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-MaS25 Soil Bq/kg Strontium-90 333.3 320 224 -416 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-MaS25 Soil Bq/kg Technetium-99 166 182 127-237 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-MaS25 Soil Bq/kg Uranium-234/233 273.67 263 184 -342 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-MaS25 Soil Bq/kg Uranium-238 287.33 274 192- 356 Acceptable 4th /2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-MaS25 Soil B/k Zinc-65 1770 1560 1092-2028 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/16/11 MAPEP-11-MaW25 Water Bq/L Americium-241 3.0667 3.18 2.23-4.13 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/16/11 MAPEP-11-MaW25 Water Bq/L Cesium-134 16.95 19.1 13.4-24.8 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/16/11 MAPEP-11-MaW25 Water Bq/L Cobalt-57 38.05 36.6 25.6 -47.6 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/16/11 MAPEP-11-MaW25 Water Bq/L Cobalt-60 30.45 29.3 20.5- 38.1 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/16/11 MAPEP-11-MaW25 Water Bq/L Hydrogen-3 965.7 1014 710- 1318 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/16/11 MAPEP-11-MaW25 Water Bq/L Manganese-54 26.95 25.0 17.5- 32.5 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/16/11 MAPEP-11-MaW25 Water Bq/L Plutonium-239/240 2.247 2.4 1.68 -3.12 Acceptable 4th/2011 11/16/11 MAPEP-11-MaW25 Water Bq/L Potassium-40 171.5 156 109-203 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/16/11 MAPEP-11-MaW25 Water Bq/L Strontium-90 14.47 14.2 9.9 -18.5 Acceptable 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 21 of 58 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 21 of 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Quarter /Year Analysis Date Sample Media GEL Value Known value Acceptance Range/ Ratio SamDle Number Unit Analvte I Nuclide Evaluation 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-MaW25 Water Bq/L Uranium-238 2.787 2.89 2.02-3.76 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-MaW25 Water Bq/L Zinc-65 32.7 28.5 20.0-37.1 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-GrW25 Water Bq/L Gross Alpha 0.876 0.866 0.260 -1.472 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-GrW25 Water Bq/L Gross Beta 5.003 4.81 2.41 -7.22 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-RdF25 Filter uo/sample Uranium-235 0.0927 0.0966 .0676 -.1256 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-RdF25 Filter uq/sample Uranium-238 12.9 13.7 9.6- 17.8 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-RdF25 Filter uq/sample Uranium-Total 13 13.8 9.7-17.9 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-RdF25 Filter Bq/sample Americium-241 0.1097 0.147 0.103 -0.191 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-RdF25 Filter Bq/sample Cesium-137 1.945 2.6 1.82- 3.38 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-RdF25 Filter Bq/sample Cobalt-57 4.23 5.09 3.56-6.62 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-RdF25 Filter Bq/sample Cobalt-60 2.525 3.2 2.24-4.16 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-RdF25 Filter Bq/sample Plutonium-238 0.096 0.1183 .0828 -.1538 Acceptable Not 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-RdF25 Filter Bq/sample Plutonium-239/240 0.094 0.135 0.095 -0.176 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-RdF25 Filter Bq/sample Strontium-90 1.213 1.67 1.17-2.17 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-RdF25 Filter Bq/sample Uranium-234/233 0.116 0.162 0.113 -0.211 Acceptable Not 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-RdF25 Filter Bq/sample Uranium-238 0.105 0.168 0.118 -0.218 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-RdF25 Filter Bq/sample Zinc-65 3.355 4.11 2.88-5.34 Acceptable Not 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-GrF25 Filter Bq/sample Gross Alpha 0.0037 -False Positive Acceptable Not 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-1 1-GrF25 Filter Bq/sample Gross Beta 0.027 -False Positive Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/16/11 MAPEP-11-RdV25 Vegetation Bq/sample Americium-241 0.205 0.222 0.155 -0.289 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/16/11 MAPEP-1 1-RdV25 Vegetation Bq/sample Cesium-137 4.72 4.71 3.30-6.12 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/16/11 MAPEP-1 1-RdV25 Vegetation Bq/sample Cobalt-60 3.48 3.38 2.37-4.39 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/16/11 MAPEP-1 1-RdV25 Vegetation Bq/sample Manganese-54 5.925 5.71 4.00-7.42 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/16/11 MAPEP-11-RdV25 Vegetation Bq/sample Plutonium-238 0.111 0.124 0.087 -0.161 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/16/11 MAPEP-1 1-RdV25 Vegetation Bq/sample Strontium-90 1.38 1.26 0.88- 1.64 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/16/11 MAPEP-1 1-RdV25 Vegetation Bq/sample Uranium-234/233 0.352 0.357 0.250 -0.464 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/16/11 MAPEP-1 1-RdV25 Vegetation Bq/sample Uranium-238 0.337 0.37 0.259 -0.481 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/16/11 MAPEP-11-RdV25 Vegetation Bq/sample Zinc-65 6.63 6.39 4.47-8.31 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/16/11 MAPEP-1 1-XaW25 Water Bq/sample Iodine-129 8.723 9.5 6.7- 12.4 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-234 2502 2530 1600-3140 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-238 2347 2560 1560-3250 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-Total 4849 5190 2960-7010 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil ug/kg Uranium-Total (mass) 6980 7570 4160-9520 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-1 5 Soil pCi/kg Americium-241 1360 1210 723-1550 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Plutonium-238 1290 1240 710- 1750 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Plutonium-239 1570 1440 983- 1910 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-234 2520 2530 1600 -3104 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-238 2670 2560 1560-3250 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-Total 5304 5190 2960-7010 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil ug/kg Uranium-Total (mass) 8000 7570 4160-9520 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Actinium-228 1250 1350 866- 1900 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Bismuth-212 1500 1400 368-2090 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Bismuth-214 1860 1420 872-2040 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Cesium-134 4750 4120 2650 -4960 Acceptable I Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 22 of 58 Quarter I Year Analysis Date Sample Media GEL Value Known value Acceptance Ranae/ Ratio Samole Number Unit Analvte I Nuclide Evaluation 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Cobalt-60 6230 5350 3890 -7180 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Lead-212 1520 1310 845-1840 Acceptable Not 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Lead-214 2090 1380 826-2050 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Manganese-54
< 46.2 < 1000 0.00 -1000 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Potassium-40 10200 12500 9060- 16900 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Thorium-234 2960 2560 813-4880 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Zinc-65 4590 3760 2980-5040 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Strontium-90 6210 5780 2090- 9430 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-234 2640 2530 1600-3140 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-238 2450 2560 1560-3250 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-Total 5200 5190 2960-7010 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil ug/kg Uranium-Total (mass) 7286 7570 4160- 9520 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil ug/kg Uranium-Total (mass) 7430 7570 4160-9520 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Americium-241 3040 2980 1700- 4090 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Curium-244 697 642 316-1000 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Plutonium-238 3000 2880 1560-4220 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Plutonium-239 2910 2980 1850-4060 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-234 2580 2420 1660 -3210 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-238 2660 2400 1690 -3030 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCiikg Uranium-Total 5356 4920 3330-6120 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil ug/kg Uranium-Total (mass) 7970 7180 4810 -9120 Acceptable 4th /2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Cesium-134 1480 1380 790-1910 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Cesium-137 1570 1270 932-1760 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Cobalt-60 1800 1500 1010-2160 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Manganese-54
< 44.0 < 300 0.00 -300 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Potassium-40 32100 28800 20700 -40800 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Zinc-65 3470 2770 2000-3790 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Strontium-90 6320 5440 3040- 7220 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Filter pCi/Filter Americium-241 63.4 76.0 44.5-104 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Filter pCi/Filter Plutonium-238 62.5 71.2 48.9-93.6 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Filter pCi/Filter Plutonium-239 65.5 69.0 50.0-89.4 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-234 66.8 74.2 46.7-110 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-238 68.8 73.5 47.0-104 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-Total 139 151 77.2 -240 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Filter ug/Filter Uranium-Total (mass) 206 220 137 -316 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Filter pCi/Filter Cesium-134 376 429 279 -531 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Filter pCi/Filter Cesium-137 465 486 365-638 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Filter pCi/Filter Cobalt-60 496 524 405-655 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Filter pCi/Filter Manganese-54
< 5.31 < 50.0 0.00-50.0 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Filter pCi/Filter Zinc-65 471 464 321 -643 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Filter pCi/Filter Strontium-90 106 112 49.3-174 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-Total (mass) 184 220 137-316 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-1 5 Filter pCi/Filter Gross Alpha 81.2 58.4 30.3 -87.8 Acceptable 4th /2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Filter pCi/Filter Gross Beta 56.0 48.9 30.1 -71.4 Acceptable 4th /2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Uranium-234 80.9 94.4 71.2 -122 Acceptable 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MLaboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 23 of 58 Quarter /YAar Analysis Sample Media GEL Value Known v21h1 Acceptance~
Snmnln Nuimber Unit An2lvta I NuiiIda Fvual. infirm 4th /2011 10131/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Uranium-Total 169 192 138 -256 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water ug/L Uranium-Total (mass) 263 281 220- 347 Acceptable 4th /2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Americium-241 135 135 92.5- 182 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Plutonium-238 122 130 98.3- 161 Acceptable 4th /2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Plutonium-239 112 121 93.6-150 Acceptable 4th /2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Uranium-234 85.4 94.4 71.2-122 Acceptable 4th /2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Uranium-238 90.5 93.6 71.5-116 Acceptable 4th /2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Uranium-Total 182 192 138-256 Acceptable 4th /2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water ug/L Uranium-Total (mass) 272 281 220-347 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Cesium-134 293 323 239 -371 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Cesium-137 423 421 358 -504 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Cobalt-60 505 486 423-574 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Manganese-54
< 6.58 < 100 0.00- 100 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 349 315 267-393 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Strontium-90 846 795 505- 1060 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Uranium-234 99.5 94.4 71.2 -122 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Uranium-238 94.4 93.6 71.5- 116 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Uranium-Total 194 192 138 -256 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water ug/L Uranium-Total (mass) 281 281 220-347 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Iron-55 667 564 328 -753 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Gross Alpha 48.2 68.9 30.6-102 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Gross Beta 45.5 51.7 30.2-75.8 Acceptable 4th/2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Tritium 19900 21300 13900-31500 Acceptable 4th / 2011 01/12/12 E8197-278 Cartridge pCi Iodine-131 9.52E+01 9.82E+01 1.07 Acceptable 4th / 2011 01/12/12 E8198-278 Milk pCi/L Strontium-89 8.78E+01 8.96E+01 0.98 Acceptable 4th / 2011 01/12/12 E8198-278 Milk pCi/L Strontium-90 1.51E+01 1.48E+01 1.02 Acceptable 4th / 2011 01/12/12 E8199-278 Milk pCi/L Iodine-131 9.36E+01 9.02E+01 1.04 Acceptable 4th / 2011 01/12/12 E8199-278 Milk pCi/L Chromium-51 5.53E+02 5.66E+02 0.98 Acceptable 4th/2011 01/12/12 E8199-278 Milk pCi/L Cesium-134 1.59E+02 1.71E+02 0.93 Acceptable 4th/2011 01/12/12 E8199-278 Milk pCi/L Cesium-137 2.27E+02 2.10E+02 1.08 Acceptable 4th/2011 01/12/12 E8199-278 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-58 2.18E+02 2.21E+02 0.99 Acceptable 4th / 2011 01/12/12 E8199-278 Milk pCi/L Manganese-54 2.52E+02 2.41E+02 1.05 Acceptable 4th / 2011 01/12/12 E8199-278 Milk pCi/L Iron-59 1.90E+02 1.83E+02 1.04 Acceptable 4th / 2011 01/12/12 E8199-278 Milk pCi/L Zinc-65 3.19E+02 2.91E+02 1.09 Acceptable 4th / 2011 01/12/12 E8199-278 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-60 2.82E+02 2.70E+02 1.04 Acceptable 4th / 2011 01/12/12 E8200-278 Water pCi/L Iodine-131 8.44E+01 8.87E+01 0.95 Acceptable 4th / 2011 01/12/12 E8200-278 Water pCi/L Chromium-51 5.32E+02 5.66E+02 0.94 Acceptable 4th/2011 01/12/12 E8200-278 Water pCi/L Cesium-134 1.56E+02 1.71E+02 0.91 Acceptable 4th /2011 01/12/12 E8200-278 Water pCi/L Cesium-137 2.06E+02 2.1OE+02 0.98 Acceptable 4th/2011 01/12/12 E8200-278 Water pCi/L Cobalt-58 2.02E+02 2.21E+02 0.92 Acceptable 4th / 2011 01/12/12 E8200-278 Water pCi/L Manganese-54 2.50E+02 2.41E+02 1.04 Acceptable 4th / 2011 01/12/12 E8200-278 Water pCi/L Iron-59 1.81 E+02 1.83E+02 0.99 Acceptable 4th / 2011 01/12/12 E8200-278 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 2.95E+02 2.91E+02 1.01 Acceptable 4th / 2011 01/12/12 E8200-278 Water pCi/L Cobalt-60 2.58E+02 2.70E+02 0.96 Acceptable Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 24 of 58 TABLE 2 2011 ECKERT & ZIEGLER ANALYTICS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS Quarter I Analysis Sample Sample Analyte / GEL Known Acceptance Year Date Number Media Unit Nuclide Value value Rangel Ratio Evaluation 1st/2011 01/11/11 E7465-278 Cartridge pCi Iodine-131 1.03E+02 9.47E+01 1.09 Acceptable 1st /2011 01/11/11 E7466-278 Milk pCi/L Strontium-89 9.23E+01 9.74E+01 0.95 Acceptable 1st / 2011 01/11/11 E7466-278 Milk pCVL Strontium-90 1.27E+01 1.58E+01 0.80 Acceptable 1st/2011 01/11/11 E7467-278 Milk pCi/L Iodine-131 1.00E+02 9.69E+01 1.03 Acceptable 1st / 2011 01/11/11 E7467-278 Milk pCi/L Chromium-51 3.27E+02 2.98E+02 1.10 Acceptable 1st / 2011 01/11/11 E7467-278 Milk pCi/L Cesium-134 1.19E+02 1.30E+02 0.91 Acceptable 1 st / 2011 01/11/11 E7467-278 Milk pCi/L Cesium-137 2.20E+02 2.05E+02 1.07 Acceptable 1st / 2011 01/11/11 E7467-278 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-58 1 .18E+02 1 .13E+02 1.04 Acceptable 1st / 2011 01111/11 E7467-278 Milk pCi/L Manganese-54 2.78E+02 2,66E+02 1.04 Acceptable 1st/ 2011 01/11/11 E7467-278 Milk pCi/L Iron-59 1.94E+02 1.75E+02 1.11 Acceptable 1st/ 2011 01/11111 E7467-278 Milk pCi/L Zinc-65 2.88E+02 2.61E+02 1.10 Acceptable 1st / 2011 01/11/11 E7467-278 Milk pCVL Cobalt-60 1.76E+02 1.72E+02 1.03 Acceptable 1 st / 2011 01/11/11 E7468-278 Water pCi/L Iodine-131 9.73E+01 9.40E+01 1.04 Acceptable lst/2011 01/11/11 E7468-278 Water pCiL Chromium-51 2.16E+02 1.96E+02 1.10 Acceptable 1st/2011 01/11/11 E7468-278 Water pCi/L Cesium-134 8.52E+01 8.56E+01 0.99 Acceptable 1st/2011 01/11/11 E7468-278 Water pCi/L Cesium-137 1.47E+02 1.35E+02 1.09 Acceptable Ist/2011 01/11/11 E7468-278 Water pCiL Cobalt-58 7.71E+01 7.44E+01 1.04 Acceptable 1st / 2011 01/11/11 E7468-278 Water pCi/L Manganese-54 1.88E+02 1.75E+02 1.08 Acceptable 1st / 2011 01/11/11 E7468-278 Water pCi/L Iron-59 1.26E+02 1 .15E+02 1.10 Acceptable 1st/2011 01/11/11 E7468-278 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 1.90E+02 1.72E+02 1.11 Acceptable lst/2011 01/11/11 E7468-278 Water pCi/L Cobalt-60 1.14E+02 1.13E+02 1.01 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7859-278 Cartridge pCi Iodine-131 8.17E+01 8.65E+01 0.95 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7860-278 Milk pCiL Strontium-89 9.68E+01 1.03E+02 0.94 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7860-278 Milk pCi/L Strontium-90 1.58E+01 1.56E+01 1.01 Acceptable 2nd /2011 07/25/11 E7861-278 Milk pCi/L lodine-131 9.OOE+01 1.03E+02 0.87 Acceptable 2nd /2011 07/25/11 E7861-278 Milk PCiL Cerium-141 8.36E+01 7.99E+01 1.05 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7861-278 Milk pCi/L Chromium-51 2.39E+02 2.06E+02 1.16 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7861-278 Milk pCi/L Cesium-1 34 1.71 E+02 1.90E+02 0.90 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7861-278 Milk pCi/L Cesium-137 1.43E+02 1.38E+02 1.04 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7861-278 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-58 1.50E+02 1.52E+02 0.99 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7861-278 Milk pCiL Manganese-54 1.32E+02 1.38E+02 0.96 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7861-278 Milk pCi/L Iron-59 1.43E+02 1.23E+02 1.16 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7861-278 Milk pCi/L Zinc-65 2.76E+02 2.61 E+02 1.06 Acceptable 2nd /2011 07/25/11 E7861-278 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-60 1.92E+02 1.95E+02 0.99 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7862-278 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 3.47E+02 3.05E+02 1.14 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7862-278 Water pCVL Cobalt-60 2.38E+02 2.28E+02 1.05 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7862-278 Water pCVL Iodine-131 1.20E+02 1.01E+02 1.19 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7862-278 Water pCi/L Cerium-141 9.30E+01 9.35E+01 0.99 Acceptable Not 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7862-278 Water pCi/L Chromium-51 3.36E+02 2.41 E+02 1.39 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7862-278 Water pCi/L Cesium-1 34 2.02E+02 2.22E+02 0.91 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7862-278 Water pCi/L Cesium-137 1.73E+02 1.61 E+02 1.07 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7862-278 Water pCi/L Manganese-54 1 .66E+02 1.61 E+02 1.03 Acceptable 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 25 of 58 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 S 0 Quarterl Year Analysis Date Sample Number Sample Media Analyte I Nuclide GEL Value Known value Acceptance Ranoe/ Ratio Unit Evaluation 2nd / 2011 07/25/11 E7862-278 Water pCi/L Iron-59 1.57E+02 1.44E+02 1.09 Acceptable 3rd/2011 10/19/11 E8095-278 Cartridge pCi Iodine-131 7.69E+01 8.02E+01 0.96 Acceptable 3rd /2011 10/19/11 E8096-278 Milk pCi/L Strontium-89 9.51E+01 9.08E+01 1.05 Acceptable Not 3rd / 2011 10/19/11 E8096-278 Milk pCi/L Strontium-90 8.49E+00 1.47E+01 0.58 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 10/19/11 E8097-278 Milk pCi/L Iodine-131 8.59E+01 8.92E+01 0.96 Acceptable 3rd 12011 10/19/11 E8097-278 Milk pCi/L Cerium-141 6.59E+01 6.67E+01 0.99 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 10/19/11 E8097-278 Milk pCi/L Chromium-51 2.18E+02 2.26E+02 0.96 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 10/19/11 E8097-278 Milk pCi/L Cesium-1 34 1.20E+02 1.28E+02 0.94 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 10/19/11 E8097-278 Milk pCi/L Cesium-137 1.23E+02 1.14E+02 1.08 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 10/19/11 E8097-278 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-58 9.08E+01 9.75E+01 0.93 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 10/19/11 E8097-278 Milk pCi/L Manganese-54 1.57E+02 1.51 E+02 1.04 Acceptable 3rd L =,. 1 10/19/11 E8097-278 Milk pCi/L Iron-59 5.30E+01 5.48E+01 0.97 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 10119/11 E8097-278 Milk pCiL Zinc-65 1.88E+02 1.80E+02 1.04 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 10/19/11 E8097-278 Milk PCiL Cobalt-60 1.51 E+02 1.57E+02 0.96 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 10/19/11 E8098-278 Water pCi/L Iodine-131 7.23E+01 8.01E+01 0.9 Acceptable 3rd/2011 10/19/11 E8098-278 Water pCi/L Cerium-141 9.06E+01 9.15E+01 0.99 Acceptable 3rd/2011 10/19/11 E8098-278 Water pCi/L Chromium-51 3.19E+02 3.10E+02 1.03 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 10/19/11 E8098-278 Water pCi/L Cesium-1 34 1.57E+02 1.76E+02 0.89 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 10/19/11 E8098-278 Water pCi/L Cesium-1 37 1.60E+02 1.56E+02 1.03 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 10/19/11 E8098-278 Water pCi/L Cobalt-58 1.34E+02 1.34E+02 1.00 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 10/19/11 E8098-278 Water pCi/L Manganese-54 2.19E+02 2.07E+02 1.06 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 10/19/11 E8098-278 Water pCi/L Iron-59 9.04E+01 7.52E+01 1.20 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 10/19/11 E8098-278 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 2.74E+02 2.47E+02 1.11 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 10/19/11 E8098-278 Water pCiL Cobalt-60 2.25E+02 2.15E+02 1.04 Acceptable 4th / 2011 01/12/12 E8197-278 Cartridge pCi Iodine-131 9.52E+01 9.82E+01 1.07 Acceptable 4th / 2011 01/12/12 E8198-278 Milk pCi/L Strontium-89 8.78E+01 8.96E+01 0.98 Acceptable 4th / 2011 01/12/12 E8198-278 Milk pCi/L Strontium-90 1.51E+01 1.48E+01 1.02 Acceptable 4th / 2011 01/12/12 E8199-278 Milk pCi/L Iodine-131 9.36E+01 9.02E+01 1.04 Acceptable 4th / 2011 01/12/12 E8199-278 Milk pCi/L Chromium-51 5.53E+02 5.66E+02 0.98 Acceptable 4th/2011 01/12/12 E8199-278 Milk pCi/L Cesium-134 1.59E+02 1.71E+02 0.93 Acceptable 4th / 2011 01/12/12 E8199-278 Milk Ci/L Cesium-137 2.27E+02 2.10E+02 1.08 Acceptable 4th/2011 01/12/12 E8199-278 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-58 2.18E+02 2.21E+02 0.99 Acceptable 4th /2011 01/12/12 E8199-278 Milk pCi/L Manganese-54 2.52E+02 2.41E+02 1.05 Acceptable 4th /2011 01/12/12 E8199-278 Milk pCi/L Iron-59 1.90E+02 1.83E+02 1.04 Acceptable 4th / 2011 01/12/12 E8199-278 Milk pCi/L Zinc-65 3.19E+02 2.91E+02 1.09 Acceptable 4th / 2011 01/12/12 E8199-278 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-60 2.82E+02 2.70E+02 1.04 Acceptable 4th/2011 01/12/12 E8200-278 Water pCi/L lodine-131 8.44E+01 8.87E+01 0.95 Acceptable 4th / 2011 01/12/12 E8200-278 Water pCi/L Chromium-51 5.32E+02 5.66E+02 0.94 Acceptable 4th / 2011 01/12/12 E8200-278 Water pCi/L Cesium-134 1.56E+02 1.71E+02 0.91 Acceptable 4th / 2011 01/12/12 E8200-278 Water pCi/L Cesium-137 2.06E+02 2.10E+02 0.98 Acceptable 4th/2011 01/12/12 E8200-278 Water pCi/L Cobalt-58 2.02E+02 2.21E+02 0.92 Acceptable 4th / 2011 01/12/12 E8200-278 Water pCi/L Manganese-54 2.50E+02 2.41 E+02 1.04 Acceptable 4th / 2011 01/12/12 E8200-278 Water pCi/L Iron-59 1.81E+02 1.83E+02 0.99 Acceptable 4th / 2011 01/12/12 E8200-278 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 2.95E+02 2.91E+02 1.01 Acceptable 4th / 2011 01/12/12 E8200-278 Water pCi/L Cobalt-60 2.58E+02 2.70E+02 0.96 Acceptable I Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 26 of 58 TABLE 3 2011 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP) RESULTS Quarter I Analysis Sample GEL Known Acceptance Year Date Sample Number Media Unit Analyte I Nuclide Value value Range/ Ratio Evaluation 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-GrF23 Filter Bq/sample Gross Beta 0.525 0.5 0.25-0.75 Acceptable 1st /2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-GrF23 Filter Bq/sample Gross Beta 106 109 82.2- 140 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-1 0-GrW23 Water Bq/L Gross Alpha 1.67 1.92 0.58 -3.26 Acceptable 1st/2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-GrW23 Water Bq/L Gross Beta 4.407 4.39 2.20-6.59 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaS23 Soil Bq/kg Americium-241 63.27 87 61- 113 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaS23 Soil Bq/kg Cesium-134 924 940 658 -1222 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaS23 Soil Bq/kg Cesium-137 685 670 469 -871 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaS23 Soil Bq/kg Cobalt-60 360 343 240-246 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaS23 Soil Bq/kg Iron-55 1120 1333 933- 1733 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaS23 Soil Bq/kg Manganese-54 875.3 820 574- 1066 Acceptable 1st/2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaS23 Soil Bq/kg Nickel-63 901.3 1058 741 -1375 Acceptable Not 1st/2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaS23 Soil Bq/kg Plutonium-238 12.4 64 45-83 Acceptable Not 1st/2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaS23 Soil Bqikg Plutonium-239/240 21.87 71 50-92 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaS23 Soil Bq/kg Potassium-40 774 699 489-909 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaS23 Soil Bq/kg Technetium-99 272.3 325 228-423 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaS23 Soil Bo/kg Uranium-234/233 266.33 278 195-361 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaS23 Soil Bq/kg Uranium-238 171 143 83.6-210 Acceptable 1 st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaS23 Soil Bq/kg Zinc-65 301 265 186- 345 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaW23 Water Bq/L Cesium-1 34 31.4 31.4 22.0-40.8 Acceptable 1 st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaW23 Water Bq/L Cesium-137 45.5 44.2 30.9-57.5 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaW23 Water Bq/L Cobalt-57 36.53 36.0 25.2-46.8 Acceptable 1st/2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaW23 Water Bq/L Cobalt-60 29.10 28.3 19.8-36.38 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaW23 Water Bq/L Hydrogen-3 429.30 453.4 317.4 -589.4 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaW23 Water Bq/L Iron-55 61.43 60.2 42.1-78.3 Acceptable 1st/2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaW23 Water Bq/L Nickel-63 50 56.10 39.3-72.9 Acceptable Not 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaW23 Water Bq/L Plutonium-238 0.866 1.81 1.27-2.35 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaW23 Water Bq/L Plutonium-239/240 1.22 1.35 0.95- 1.76 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaW23 Water Bq/L Potassium-40 42.3 38.9 27.2-50.6 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10110 MAPEP-10-MaW23 Water Bq/L Strontium-90 7.03 8.3 5.8- 10.8 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaW23 Water Bq/L Technetium-99 33.3 33.6 23.5-43.7 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaW23 Water Bq/L Uranium-234/233 1.937 2.01 1.41-2.61 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaW23 Water Bq/L Uranium-238 2.043 2.07 1.45-2.69 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-MaW23 Water Bq/L Zinc-65 34.77 31.0 21.7-40.3 Acceptable 1 st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RaF23 Filter ug/sample Uranium-235 0.0764 0.074 0.052 -0.096 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RaF23 Filter ug/sample Uranium-238 10.5 10.2 7.1 -13.3 Acceptable 1 st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RaF23 Filter ug/sample Uranium-Total 10.9 10.3 7.2-13.4 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RaF23 Filter Bq/sample Americium-241 0.0917 0.115 0.081 -0.150 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RaF23 Filter Bq/sample Cesium-134 2.95 2.98 2.09 -3.87 Acceptable 1 st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RaF23 Filter Bq/sample Cobalt-57 4.06 4.08 2.86-5.30 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RaF23 Filter Bq/sample Cobalt-60 2.97 2.92 2.04- 3.80 Acceptable 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* I Laboratories LLC* P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417* 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 27 of 58 Quarter I Analysis Date Sample Media GEL I Known Acceptance Ranael Ratio 0 0 0 09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0P 0 0 0 0 Year Samale Number Unit I Analvte / Nuclide I Value I value Evaluation 1st 12011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RaF23 Filter Bq/sample Manganese-54 3.347 3.18 2.23-4.13 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-1 0-RaF23 Filter Bq/sample Plutonium-238 0.049 0.0489 0.0342 -0.0336 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RaF23 Filter Bq/sample Plutonium-239/240 0.076 0.082 0.057 -0.107 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RaF23 Filter Bq/sample Strontium-90 0.854 1.01 0.71-1.31 Acceptable 1st/2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RaF23 Filter Bq/sample Uranium-234/233 0.124 0.122 0.085-0.159 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11110/10 MAPEP-10-RaF23 Filter Bq/sample Uranium-238 0.122 0.127 0.089 -0.165 Acceptable 1st/2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RdV23 Vegetation Bq/sample Americium-241 0.210 0.270 0.189-0.351 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RdV23 Vegetation Bq/sample Cesium-134 4.485 4.79 3.35-6.23 Acceptable 1st /2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RdV23 Vegetation Bq/sample Cesium-137 4.759 5.88 4.12- 7.64 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RdV23 Vegetation Bq/sample Cobalt-57 9.389 8.27 5.79- 10.75 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RdV23 Vegetation Bq/sample Manganese-54 7.34 6.287 4.401 -8.173 Acceptable 1st/2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RdV23 Vegetation Bq/sample Plutonium-238 0.258 0.221 0.155-0.287 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RdV23 Vegetation Bq/sample Strontium-90 2.790 2.63 1.84 -3.42 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RdV23 Vegetation Bq/sample Uranium-234/233 0.392 0.320 0.224 -0.416 Acceptable 1st / 2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RdV23 Vegetation Bq/sample Uranium-238 0.405 0.330 0.231 -0.429 Acceptable 1st /2011 11/10/10 MAPEP-10-RdV23 Vegetation Bq/sample Zinc-65 6.630 5.39 3.77 -7.01 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 04/05/11 GENE01-11-MaWR3 Water Bq/L Plutonium-238 1.1 1.16 0.81 -1.51 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 04/05/11 GENE01-11-MaWR3 Water Bq/L Plutonium-239/240 0.8 0.85 0.60- 1.11 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 04/05/11 GENE01-11-RdFR1 Water Bq/sample Plutonium-238 0.00737 0.00836 .00585-.01087 Acceptable 2nd /2011 04/05/11 GENE01-11-RdFR1 Water Bq/sample Plutonium-239/240 0.00481 0.00670 .00469-.00871 Acceptable Not 3rd /2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-GrF24 Filter Bq/sample Gross Alpha 0.102 0.659 0.198 -1.120 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-1 1 -GrF24 Filter Bq/sample Gross Beta 1.210 1.32 0.662 -1.985 Acceptable 3rd /2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-GrW24 Water Bq/L Gross Alpha 1.019 1.136 0.341 -1.931 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-GrW24 Water Bq/L Gross Beta 3.140 2.96 1.48 -4.44 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaS24 Soil mg/kg Americium-241 64.93 61.1 42.8 -79.4 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaS24 Soil mg/kg Cesium-134 686.5 680 476 -884 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaS24 Soil mg/kg Cesium-137 783 758 531 -985 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-1 1-MaS24 Soil mg/kg Cobalt-57 898.5 927 649- 1205 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-1 1-MaS24 Soil mg/kg Cobalt-60 493.5 482 337 -627 Acceptable Not 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaS24 Soil mg/kg Iron-55 245 387 271 -503 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaS24 Soil mg/kg Nickel-63 440.3 582 407-757 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaS24 Soil mg/kg Plutonium-239/240 90.87 98.0 68.6 -127.4 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaS24 Soil mg/kg Potassium-40 588 540 378 -702 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaS24 Soil mg/kg Strontium-90 112.8 160 112- 208 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaS24 Soil mq/k&#xb6; Uranium-234/233 175.33 176 123-229 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-1 1-MaS24 Soil mg/kg Uranium-238 195.67 184 129 -239 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaS24 Soil mg/kg Zinc-65 1515 1359 951-1767 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-1 1-MaW24 Water Bq/L Americium-241 0.4877 0.529 0.370 -0.688 Acceptable 3rd /2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaW24 Water Bq/L Cesium-134 19.60 21.5 15.1 -28.0 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05107/11 MAPEP-1 1-MaW24 Water Bq/L Cesium-137 29.9 29.4 20.6 -38.2 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05107/11 MAPEP-11-MaW24 Water Bq/L Cobalt-60 24.75 24.6 17.2-32.0 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaW24 Water Bq/L Hydrogen-3 225.3 243 170 -316 Acceptable Not 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaW24 Water Bq/L Iron-55 14.10 26.4 18.5- 34.3 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaW24 Water Bq/L Manganese-54 32.9 31.6 22.1 -41.1 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaW24 Water Bq/L Nickel-63 19.2 18.6 13.0 -24.2 Acceptable Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 28 of 58 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 28 of 58 Quarter I Analys~is Sample" 1,1 GEL 1.1 1 Known'I.Acceptance 0 -10.I 4I a I UJ U I I.14 A I I. M 1l1A.-3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaW24 Water Bq/L Plutonium-238 1.005 1.064 0.745 -1.383 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-1 1-MaW24 Water Bq/L Plutonium-239/240 0.755 0.809 0.566 -1.052 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaW24 Water Bq/L Potassium-40 99.8 91 64- 118 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaW24 Water Bq/L Strontium-90 8.05 8.72 6.10 -11.34 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaW24 Water Bq/L Technetium-99 8.6 8.99 6.29- 11.69 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaW24 Water Bq/L Uranium-234/233 1.537 1.50 1.05 -1.95 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-MaW24 Water Bq/L Uranium-238 1.457 1.54 1.08 -2.00 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdF24 Filter ug/sample Uranium-235 0.108 0.106 0.074 -0.138 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdF24 Filter ug/sample Uranium-238 14.4 14.9 10.4- 19.4 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdF24 Filter ug/sample Uranium-Total 14.4 15.0 10.5- 19.5 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdF24 Filter Bq/sample Cesium-134 3.39 3.49 2.44 -4.54 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdF24 Filter Bq/sample Cesium-1 37 2.375 2.28 1.60 -2.96 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdF24 Filter Bq/sample Cobalt-57 3.60 3.33 2.33 -4.33 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdF24 Filter Bq/sample Manganese-54 2.975 2.64 1.85 -3.43 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdF24 Filter Bq/sample Plutonium-238 0.092 0.096 0.067 -0.125 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdF24 Filter Bq/sample Plutonium-239/240 0.073 0.0765 0.0536 -0.0995 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-1 1 -RdF24 Filter Bq/sample Strontium-90 1.373 1.36 0.95 -1.77 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdF24 Filter Bq/sample Uranium-234/233 0.184 0.178 0.125 -0.231 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdF24 Filter Bq/sample Uranium-238 0.183 0.185 0.130 -0.241 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdF24 Filter Bq/sample Zinc-65 3.470 3.18 2.23-4.13 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdV24 Vegetation Bq/sample Cesium-134 5.120 5.50 3.85-7.15 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdV24 Vegetation Bq/sample Cobalt-57 9.835 9.94 6.96- 12.92 Acceptable 3rd 12011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdV24 Vegetation Bq/sample Cobalt-60 5.060 4.91 3.44 -6.38 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdV24 Vegetation Bq/sample Manganese-54 6.405 6.40 4.48 -8.32 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdV24 Vegetation Bq/sample Plutonium-238 0.110 0.102 0.071 -0.133 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdV24 Vegetation Bq/sample Plutonium-239/240 0.1277 0.141 0.099 -0.183 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdV24 Vegetation Bq/sample Strontium-90 2.430 2.46 1.72 -3.20 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdV24 Vegetation Bq/sample Uranium-234/233 0.158 0.163 0.114 -0.212 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdV24 Vegetation Bq/sample Uranium-238 0.159 0.168 0.118 -0.218 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 05/07/11 MAPEP-11-RdV24 Vegetation Bq/sample Zinc-65 3.275 2.99 2.09 -3.89 Acceptable Not 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-GrF25 Filter Bq/sample Gross Alpha 0.0037 -False Positive Acceptable Not 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-GrF25 Filter Bq/sample Gross Beta 0.027 -False Positive Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-GrW25 Water Bq/L Gross Alpha 0.876 0.866 0.260 -1.472 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-GrW25 Water Bq/L Gross Beta 5.003 4.81 2.41 -7.22 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-MaS25 Soil Bq/kg Cesium-137 990.5 979 685 -1273 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-MaS25 Soil Bq/kg Cobalt-57 1140 1180 826-1534 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-MaS25 Soil Bq/kg Cobalt-60 665.5 644 451 -837 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-MaS25 Soil Bqikg Iron-55 1206.7 1000 700-1300 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-MaS25 Soil Bq/kg Manganese-54 897.5 848 594- 1102 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-MaS25 Soil Bq/kg Plutonium-238 90.9 93.6 65.5 -121.7 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-MaS25 Soil Bq/kg Plutonium-239/240 76.6 77.4 54.2- 100.6 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-MaS25 Soil Bq/kg Potassium-40 692 625 438-813 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-MaS25 Soil Bg/kg Strontium-90 333.3 320 224 -416 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-MaS25 Soil Bq/kg Technetium-99 166 182 127 -237 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-MaS25 Soil Bq/kg 1 Uranium-234/233 273.67 263 184 -342 Acceptable 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* ~Laboratories LLC 0 0 P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417* 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 29 of 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Quarter I Analysis Year Date Sample Media GEL Value Known value Acceptance Ranael Ratio Samole Number Unit Analvte I Nuclide Evaluation 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-MaS25 Soil Bq/kg Uranium-238 287.33 274 192- 356 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-MaS25 Soil Bq/kg Zinc-65 1770 1560 1092 -2028 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/16/11 MAPEP-11-MaW25 Water Bq/L Americium-241 3.0667 3.18 2.23 -4.13 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/16/11 MAPEP-11-MaW25 Water Bq/L Cesium-134 16.95 19.1 13.4-24.8 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/16/11 MAPEP-11-MaW25 Water Bq/L Cobalt-57 38.05 36.6 25.6 -47.6 Acceptable 4th/ 2011 11/16/11 MAPEP-11-MaW25 Water Bq/L Cobalt-60 30.45 29.3 20.5-38.1 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/16/11 MAPEP-11-MaW25 Water Bq/L Hydrogen-3 965.7 1014 710- 1318 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/16/11 MAPEP-11-MaW25 Water Bq/L Manganese-54 26.95 25.0 17.5 -32.5 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/16/11 MAPEP-11-MaW25 Water Bq/L Plutonium-239/240 2.247 2.4 1.68-3.12 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/16/11 MAPEP-11-MaW25 Water Bq/L Potassium-40 171.5 156 109-203 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/16/11 MAPEP-11-MaW25 Water Bq/L Strontium-90 14.47 14.2 9.9- 18.5 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/16/11 MAPEP-11-MaW25 Water Bq/L Uranium-234/233 2.673 2.78 1.95- 3.61 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-MaW25 Water Bq/L Uranium-238 2.787 2.89 2.02-3.76 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-MaW25 Water Bq/L Zinc-65 32.7 28.5 20.0 -37.1 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-RdF25 Filter uq/sample Uranium-235 0.0927 0.0966 0.0676 -0.1256 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-RdF25 Filter ug/sample Uranium-238 12.9 13.7 9.6 -17.8 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-RdF25 Filter uq/sample Uranium-Total 13 13.8 9.7- 17.9 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-RdF25 Filter Bqlsample Americium-241 0.1097 0.147 0.103 -0.191 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-1 1 -RdF25 Filter Bq/sample Cesium-1 37 1.945 2.6 1.82 -3.38 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-RdF25 Filter Bq/sample Cobalt-57 4.23 5.09 3.56-6.62 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-RdF25 Filter Bq/sample Cobalt-60 2.525 3.2 2.24-4.16 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-RdF25 Filter Bq/sample Plutonium-238 0.096 0.1183 0.0828 -0,1538 Acceptable Not 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-RdF25 Filter Bq/sample Plutonium-239/240 0.094 0.135 0.095 -0.176 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-RdF25 Filter Bq/sample Strontium-90 1.213 1.67 1.17-2.17 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-RdF25 Filter Bq/sample Uranium-234/233 0.116 0.162 0.113 -0.211 Acceptable Not 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-RdF25 Filter Bq/sample Uranium-238 0.105 0.168 0.118 -0.218 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/21/11 MAPEP-11-RdF25 Filter Bq/sample Zinc-65 3.355 4.11 2.88- 5.34 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/16/11 MAPEP-11-RdV25 Vegetation Bq/sample Americium-241 0.205 0.222 0.155 -0.289 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/16/11 MAPEP-11-RdV25 Vegetation Bq/sample Cesium-137 4.72 4.71 3.30-6.12 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/16111 MAPEP-11-RdV25 Vegetation Bq/sample Cobalt-60 3.48 3.38 2.37 -4.39 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/16/11 MAPEP-11-RdV25 Vegetation Bq/sample Manganese-54 5.925 5.71 4.00- 7.42 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/16/11 MAPEP-11-RdV25 Vegetation Bq/sample Plutonium-238 0.111 0.124 0.087 -0.161 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/16/11 MAPEP-1 1-RdV25 Vegetation Bq/sample Strontium-90 1.38 1.26 0.88 -1.64 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/16/11 MAPEP-11-RdV25 Vegetation Bq/sample Uranium-234/233 0.352 0.357 0.250 -0.464 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/16/11 MAPEP-11-RdV25 Vegetation Bq/sample Uranium-238 0.337 0.37 0.259 -0.481 Acceptable 4th / 2011 11/16/11 MAPEP-11-RdV25 Vegetation Bql/sample Zinc-65 6.63 6.39 4.47 -8.31 Acceptable 4th/2011 11/16/11 MAPEP-11-XaW25 Water Bq/sample Iodine-129 8.723 9.5 6.7-12.4 Acceptable Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 30 of 58 TABLE 4 2011 ERA PROGRAM PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS Quarter / Analytical Sample Sample GEL Known Acceptance Year Date Number Media Unit Analyte I Nuclide Value value Range/ Ratio Evaluation Not 1st /2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Barium-133 58.4 52.3 43.1 -57.9 Acceptable 1st /2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCVL Cesium-134 53.0 56.2 45.4-61.8 Acceptable 1st / 2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Cesium-137 103 100 90.0- 112 Acceptable 1st /2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Cobalt-60 73.2 68.9 62.0-78.2 Acceptable 1st /2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 166 153 138-180 Acceptable 1st /2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Gross Alpha 65.1 62.5 32.7-77.5 Acceptable 1st / 2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Gross Beta 54.4 51.9 35.3-58.9 Acceptable 1st / 2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Gross Alpha 51.2 62.5 32.7-77.5 Acceptable 1st / 2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Radium-226 8.06 8.26 6.21 -9.71 Acceptable 1st / 2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Radium-228 7.4 7.35 4.64 -9.40 Acceptable 1st /2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Uranium (Nat) 46.1 45.6 37.0-50.7 Acceptable 1st /2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water ug/L Uranium (Nat) mass 69.6 66.5 53.9-74.0 Acceptable 1st /2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Radium-226 9.68 8.26 6.21 -9.71 Acceptable 1st /2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Radium-228 6.41 7.35 4.64 -9.40 Acceptable 1st / 2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Uranium (Nat) 45.3 45.6 37.0-50.7 Acceptable 1st / 2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water ug/L Uranium (Nat) mass 67.6 66.5 53.9-74.0 Acceptable 1st / 2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Tritium 2930 3460 2930-3820 Acceptable 1 st / 2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Strontium-89 48.9 55.3 44.1 -62.9 Acceptable 1 st / 2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Strontium-90 27 33.1 24.2-38.3 Acceptable 1st / 2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Strontium-89 55.3 55.3 44.1 -62.9 Acceptable 1st /2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Strontium-90 29.3 33.1 24.2-38.3 Acceptable 1st /2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Iodine-131 29 26.8 22.3-31.5 Acceptable 1st /2011 02/18/11 RAD -84 Water pCi/L Iodine-131 23.9 26.8 22.3-31.5 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/03/11 040511P Water pCi/L Strontium-89 57.9 68.1 55.4-76.2 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/03/11 040511 P Water pCi/L Strontium-90 32.4 29.9 21.8 -34.7 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 06/14/11 052011J Water pCi/L Barium-133 76.6 75.3 63.0-82.8 Acceptable 2nd /2011 06/14/11 052011J Water pCi/L Cesium-134 71.3 72.9 59.5-80.2 Acceptable 2nd /2011 06/14/11 052011J Water pCi/L Cesium-137 78.8 77.0 69.3-87.4 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 06/14/11 052011 J Water pCi/L Cobalt-60 92.7 88.8 79.9- 100 Acceptable 2nd /2011 06/14/11 052011J Water pCi/L Zinc-65 118 98.9 89.0-118 Acceptable 3rd /2011 08/11/11 071111J Filter pCi/Filter Gross Alpha 13.2 8.80 4.56-13.2 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 08/11/11 071111J Filter pCi/Filter Gross Beta 84.7 92.2 56.8-92.2 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 08/11/11 071111J Soil pCi/kg Americium-241 2130 1660 992-2130 Acceptable 3rd /2011 08/11/11 071111J Soil pCi/kg Actinium-228 1300 1330 860-1880 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 08/11/11 071111J Soil pCi/kg Bismuth-212 1460 1550 406-2310 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 08/11/11 071111J Soil pCi/kg Bismuth-214 1430 1420 872- 2050 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 08/11/11 071111J Soil pCi/kg Cesium-134 6000 5170 3330-6220 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 08/11/11 07111 1J Soil pCi/kg Cesium-137 6190 4970 3800- 6460 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 08/11/11 071111J Soil pCi/kg Cobalt-60 9680 7520 5470 -10100 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 08/11/11 071111J Soil pCi/kg Lead-212 1300 1260 820-1780 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 08/11/11 071111J Soil pCi/kg Lead-214 1700 1510 902 -2260 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 08/11/11 071111J Soil p/kg Manganese-54
<263 0.00 -Acceptable 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* ~Laboratories LLC 0 P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 a 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 31 of 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 Quarter I Analytical Year Date Sample Number Sample Media GEL Value Known value Acceptance Ranoal Ratio Unit Analvte I Nuclide Evaluation 3rd / 2011 08/11/11 071111J Soil pCi/kg Potassium-40 10200 11200 8060-15100 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 08/11/11 071111J Soil pCi/kg Thorium-234 1460 1590 500-3020 Acceptable Not 3rd / 2011 08/11/11 071111J Soil pCi/kg Zinc-65 2910 1940 1540-2600 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 08/11/11 071111J Soil pCi/kg Strontium-90 8390 5750 2080- 9380 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 08/11/11 07111 1J Water pCi/L Iron-55 426 588 342 -785 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 08/18/11 RAD-86 Water pCi/L Gross Alpha 44.2 71.5 37.6- 88.2 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 08/18/11 RAD-86 Water pCi/L Gross Beta 58.4 63.4 43.8- 70.0 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 08/18/11 RAD-86 Water pCVL Gross Alpha 53.1 71.5 37.6- 88.2 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 08/18/11 RAD-86 Water pCi/L Tritium 7200 7620 6600 -8370 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 08/18/11 RAD-86 Water pCi/L Strontium-89 51.9 52.3 41.4 -59.8 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 08/18/11 RAD-86 Water pCi/L Strontium-90 20.3 26.4 19.1 -30.8 Acceptable Not 3rd / 2011 08/18/11 RAD-86 Water pCi/L lodine-131 35.4 26.0 21.6-30.7 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 09/02/11 RAD-800 Water pCi/L Barium-133 55.3 51.6 42.5-57.2 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 09/02/11 RAD-800 Water pCVL Cesium-134 77.9 84.1 68.9-92.5 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 09/02/11 RAD-800 Water pCi/L Cesium-137 111 109 98.1 -122 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 09/02111 RAD-800 Water pCi/L Cobalt-60 110 109 98.1 -122 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 09/02/11 RAD-800 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 63.4 52.8 46.3 -64.8 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 09/02/11 RAD-800 Water pCi/L Radium-226 14.3 14.6 10.9-16.8 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 09/02/11 RAD-800 Water pCi/L Radium-228 12.6 13.2 8.75-16.1 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 09/02/11 RAD-800 Water pCi/L Uranium (Nat) 50.7 51.2 41.6 -56.9 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 09/02/11 RAD-800 Water ug/L Uranium (Nat) mass 71.7 74.7 60.6 -83.0 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 09/02/11 RAD-800 Water pCi/L Radium-226 14.1 14.6 10.9-16.8 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 09/02/11 RAD-800 Water pCi/L Radium-228 12.5 13.2 8.75-16.1 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 09/02/11 RAD-800 Water pCi/L Uranium (Nat) 52.2 51.2 41.6 -56.9 Acceptable 3rd / 2011 09/02/11 RAD-800 Water ug/L Uranium (Nat) mass 77.9 74.7 60.6 -83.0 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/25/11 RAD-87 Liquid pCi/L Iodine-131 28.5 27.5 22.9 -32.3 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/25/11 RAD-87 Liquid pCi/L Iodine-131 28.7 27.5 22.9 -32.3 Acceptable MI Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 32 of 58 TABLE 5 2011 ERA PROGRAM (MRAD) PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS Quarter I Analytical Sample Sample GEL Known Acceptance Year Date Number Media Unit Analyte / Nuclide Value value Range/ Ratio Evaluation 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Actinium-228 1290 1490 958 -2100 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Bismuth-212 1340 1400 368-2090 Acceptable 2nd 12011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCVkg Bismuth-214 749 725 445- 1040 Acceptable Not 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Cesium-134 3240 2450 1580-2950 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Cesium-137 2440 1920 1470-2490 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Cobalt-60 2850 2220 1620-2980 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Lead-212 1160 1440 931 -2030 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Lead-214 848 805 482 -1200 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Manganese-54
<33.9 0.00 --- Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Potassium-40 11400 11500 8320-15600 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Thorium-234 696 962 305- 1830 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Zinc-65 2670 1990 1580-2670 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Strontium-90 6570 7590 2740- 12400 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCitkg Uranium-234 941 972 616- 1210 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-238 776 962 588- 1220 Acceptable 2nd /2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-Total 1754 1980 1130-2670 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil ug/kg Uranium-Total(mass) 2314 2890 1590- 3640 Acceptable Not 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Americium-241 1260 914 546 -1170 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Plutonium-238 1500 1420 813-2000 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Plutonium-239 1540 1400 956 -1860 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-234 671 972 616-1210 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-238 783 962 588 -1220 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-Total 1498 1980 1130- 2670 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil ug/kg Uranium-Total(mass) 2350 2890 1590-3640 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Soil ug/kg Uranium-Total(mass) 1950 2890 1590-3640 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Vegetation pCi/kg Americium-241 3430 3200 1820 -4400 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Vegetation pCi/kg Curium-244 829 812 400 -1260 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Vegetation pCi/kg Plutonium-238 2910 2990 1610-4380 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Vegetation pCi/kg Plutonium-239 3000 3100 1920-4230 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Vegetation pCi/kg Uranium-234 2400 2610 1790-3460 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Vegetation pCi/kg Uranium-238 2510 2590 1820-3270 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Vegetation pCi/kg Uranium-Total 5032 5320 3660 -6860 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Vegetation ug/kg Uranium-Total(mass) 7530 7760 5340- 10000 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Vegetation pCi/kg Americium-241 3760 3200 1820- 4400 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Vegetation pCi/kg Cesium-134 829 770 441 -1070 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Vegetation pCi/kg Cesium-137 883 829 608- 1150 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Vegetation pCi/kg Cobalt-60 795 733 496 -1050 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Vegetation pCi/kg Manganese-54
<34.1 0.00 -Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Vegetation pCi/kg Potassium-40 28300 25800 18500-36500 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Vegetation pCi/kg Zinc-65 1020 799 577- 1090 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Vegetation pCi/kg Plutonium-238 2910 2990 1610 -4380 Acceptable 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* ~Laboratories LLC* P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417*2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT AcPtane 3 f5 S S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S Quarter !Year Analytical Sample Date Number Sample Media GEL IKnown IAcceptance Value value Ranae/ Ratio Unit I Analvte / Nuclide Evaluation 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Vegetation pCi/kg Plutonium-239 3000 3100 1920-4230 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Vegetation pCi/kg Strontium-90 7400 7890 4410- 10500 Acceptable 2nd /2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter pCi/Filter Americium-241 69.2 62.5 36.6 -85.7 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter pCi/Filter Plutonium-238 69.3 69.0 47.4 -90.7 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter pCi/Filter Plutonium-239 65.4 65.5 47.5-84.8 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-234 60.3 61.5 38.7 -91.1 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-238 66.7 61.0 39.0 -86.6 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-Total 131.1 125 63.9- 199 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter ug/Filter Uranium-Total(mass) 200 183 114 -263 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter pCi/Filter Americium-241 74.9 62.5 36.6-85.7 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter pCi/Filter Cesium-134 260 279 182-345 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter pCi/Filter Cesium-137 320 312 234 -410 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter pCi/Filter Cobalt-60 426 390 302 -487 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter pCi/Filter Manganese-54
<4.6 0.00 -- Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter pCi/Filter Zinc-65 318 279 193 -386 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter pCi/Filter Strontium-90 192 185 81.4-288 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter pCi/Filter Iron-55 391 385 169-599 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter ug/Filter Uranium-Total(mass) 185 183 114 -263 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-234 54.8 61.5 38.7 -91.1 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-238 54.4 61.0 39.0-86.6 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-Total 109 125 63.9-199 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter ug/Filter Uranium-Total(mass) 177 183 114 -263 Acceptable Not 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter pCi/Filter Gross Alpha <5.00 74.3 38.5- 112 Acceptable Not 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Filter pCi/Filter Gross Beta 34.1 69.5 42.8-102 Acceptable 2nd /2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Uranium-234 87.1 94.3 71.1 -122 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Uranium-238 81.0 93.5 71.4 -116 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Uranium-Total 168.1 192 138-256 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water ug/L Uranium-Total(mass) 241 280 219-346 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Americium-241 137 135 92.5-182 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Plutonium-238 116 131 99.1 -162 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Plutonium-239 101 119 92.1 -147 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Uranium-234 88.5 94.3 71.1 -122 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Uranium-238 88.1 93.5 71.4- 116 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Uranium-Total 180.7 192 138-256 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water ug/L Uranium-Total(mass) 264 280 219-346 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Americium-241 140 135 92.5 -182 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Cesium-134 222 231 171 -265 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Cesium-137 430 417 354-500 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Cobalt-60 430 411 358 -486 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11111 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Manganese-54
<5.17 0.00 -- Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 131 111 94.1 -138 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Strontium-90 782 773 491 -1030 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Uranium-234 100 94.3 71.1 -122 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Uranium-238 88.7 93.5 71.4- 116 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Uranium-Total 188.7 192 138 -256 Acceptable I Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 34 of 58 Quarter I Year Analytical Sample Date Number Sample Media GEL Value Known I Acceptance Unit Analyte / Nuclide value I Range/ Ratio Evaluation 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water ug/L Uranium-Total(mass) 264 280 219 -346 Acceptable Not 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Iron-55 245 437 254 -584 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Gross Alpha 99.7 112 49.7- 166 Acceptable 2nd / 2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Gross Beta 103 99.8 58.4- 146 Acceptable 2nd /2011 05/11/11 MRAD-14 Water pCi/L Tritium 13300 15200 9900 -22500 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-234 2502 2530 1600-3140 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-238 2347 2560 1560-3250 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-Total 4849 5190 2960-7010 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil ug/kg Uranium-Total (mass) 6980 7570 4160-9520 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Americium-241 1360 1210 723 -1550 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Plutonium-238 1290 1240 710- 1750 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Plutonium-239 1570 1440 983-1910 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-234 2520 2530 1600-3104 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-238 2670 2560 1560-3250 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-Total 5304 5190 2960-7010 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil ug/kg Uranium-Total (mass) 8000 7570 4160-9520 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Actinium-228 1250 1350 866-1900 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Bismuth-212 1500 1400 368-2090 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Bismuth-214 1860 1420 872 -2040 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Cesium-134 4750 4120 2650-4960 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Cesium-137 5940 4660 3560 -6050 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Cobalt-60 6230 5350 3890 -7180 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Lead-212 1520 1310 845-1840 Acceptable Not 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Lead-214 2090 1380 826-2050 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Manganese-54
<46.2 < 1000 0.00- 1000 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Potassium-40 10200 12500 9060- 16900 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Thorium-234 2960 2560 813-4880 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Zinc-65 4590 3760 2980-5040 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Strontium-90 6210 5780 2090-9430 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-234 2640 2530 1600-3140 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-238 2450 2560 1560-3250 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-Total 5200 5190 2960-7010 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil ug/kg Uranium-Total (mass) 7286 7570 4160-9520 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil ug/kg Uranium-Total (mass) 7430 7570 4160 -9520 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Americium-241 3040 2980 1700-4090 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Curium-244 697 642 316- 1000 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Plutonium-238 3000 2880 1560-4220 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Plutonium-239 2910 2980 1850-4060 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-234 2580 2420 1660- 3210 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-238 2660 2400 1690- 3030 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-Total 5356 4920 3330-6120 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil ug/kg Uranium-Total (mass) 7970 7180 4810 -9120 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Cesium-134 1480 1380 790- 1910 Acceptable 4th/2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Cesium-137 1570 1270 932-1760 Acceptable 4th/2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Cobalt-60 1800 1500 1010 -2160 Acceptable 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0* ~Laboratories LLC 0l P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417*2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT AcPtane 3 f5 S S 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 Quarter /Year Analytical Sample Date Number Sample Media GEL Known Acceptance Unit Anaivte I Nuclide Evaluation 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Manganese-54
< 44.0 < 300 0.00- 300 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31111 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Potassium-40 32100 28800 20700-40800 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Zinc-65 3470 2770 2000- 3790 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Soil pCi/kg Strontium-90 6320 5440 3040 -7220 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10131/11 MRAD-15 Filter pCi/Filter Americium-241 63.4 76.0 44.5- 104 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Filter pCi/Filter Plutonium-238 62.5 71.2 48.9- 93.6 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Filter pCi/Filter Plutonium-239 65.5 69.0 50.0- 89.4 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-234 66.8 74.2 46.7- 110 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-238 68.8 73.5 47.0- 104 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-Total 139 151 77.2 -240 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10131/11 MRAD-15 Filter ug/Filter Uranium-Total (mass) 206 220 137-316 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Filter pCi/Filter Cesium-1 34 376 429 279 -531 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Filter pCi/Filter Cesium-137 465 486 365-638 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Filter pCi/Filter Cobalt-60 496 524 405 -655 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-1 5 Filter pCi/Filter Manganese-54
< 5.31 < 50.0 0.00 -50.0 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Filter pCi/Filter Zinc-65 471 464 321 -643 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10131/11 MRAD-15 Filter pCi/Filter Strontium-90 106 112 49.3-174 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-Total (mass) 184 220 137-316 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Filter pCi/Filter Gross Alpha 81.2 58.4 30.3 -87.8 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Filter pCi/Filter Gross Beta 56.0 48.9 30.1 -71.4 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Uranium-234 80.9 94.4 71.2-122 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Uranium-238 88.3 93.6 71.5 -116 Acceptable 4th /2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Uranium-Total 169 192 138 -256 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water ug/L Uranium-Total (mass) 263 281 220 -347 Acceptable 4th /2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Americium-241 135 135 92.5- 182 Acceptable 4th /2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Plutonium-238 122 130 98.3-161 Acceptable 4th/2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Plutonium-239 112 121 93.6-150 Acceptable 4th /2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Uranium-234 85.4 94.4 71.2-122 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Uranium-238 90.5 93.6 71.5- 116 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Uranium-Total 182 192 138-256 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water ug/L Uranium-Total (mass) 272 281 220-347 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Cesium-134 293 323 239-371 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Cesium-137 423 421 358-504 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-1 5 Water pCi/L Cobalt-60 505 486 423 -574 Acceptable 4th /2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Manganese-54
< 6.58 < 100 0.00-100 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-1 5 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 349 315 267 -393 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Strontium-90 846 795 505 -1060 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Uranium-234 99.5 94.4 71.2- 122 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Uranium-238 94.4 93.6 71.5- 116 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Uranium-Total 194 192 138 -256 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water ug/L Uranium-Total (mass) 281 281 220-347 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Iron-55 667 564 328-753 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Gross Alpha 48.2 68.9 30.6-102 Acceptable 4th / 2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Gross Beta 45.5 51.7 30.2-75.8 Acceptable 4th /2011 10/31/11 MRAD-15 Water pCi/L Tritium 19900 21300 13900-31500 Acceptable I Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 36 of 58 FIGURE 1 0 0 0 0 0 COBALT-60 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS AND % BIAS 2011 Cobalt-60 Performance Evaluation Results and % Bias 100.0 75.0 50.0 Co-60 25.0---.- Lower Control Limit m 0.0 ------ Upper Control Limit-25.0 L-50.0-75.0-100.0 November 2010 -January 2012 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 MLaboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 37 of 58 FIGURE 2 CESIUM-137 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS AND % BIAS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 S 2011 Cesium-I137 Performance Evaluation Results and %- Bias 100.0 C Cs-137----Lower Control S 0.0 Limit---Upper Control---- --Limit-50.0-75.0-100.0 November 2010 -January 2012 Laboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 38 of 58 0 FIGURE 3 TRITIUM PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS AND % BIAS 2011 Tritium Performance Evaluation Results and % Bias 100.0 *75.0 50.0 0 -H-3 25.0'A&#xfd;S- ---Lower Control 0.0 Limit----UpperControl
-25.0 Limit-50.0-75.0-100.0 November 2010- November 2011 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MLaboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 39 of 58 FIGURE 4 STRONTIUM-90 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS AND % BIAS 2011 Strontium-90 Performance Evaluation Results and % Bias 100.0 75.0 Strontium  ---Lower Control S 0.0 Limit-....-Upper Control-25.0Limit
-50.0-100.0 November 2010- January 2012 MLaboratories LLC P.O. Box 30712, Charleston, SC 29417 2011 ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT Page 40 of 58 0 FIGURE 5 GROSS ALPHA PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS AND % BIAS 2011 Gross Alpha Performance Evaluation Results and % Bias 200.0-150.0 100.05 50.0 -.-- Gross Alpha--Lower Control 0.0 Limit--.-.- Upper Control-50.0 Limit-100.0-150.0-200.0 November 2010 -November 2011 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0}}

Latest revision as of 08:32, 12 April 2019

Redirect to:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML12128A479&oldid=1448288"