ML15313A153: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
#REDIRECT [[MNS-15-077, Expedited Seismic Evaluation Process (ESEP) Report (CEUS Sites), Response to NRC Request for Information, Per 10CFR50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima..]]
| number = ML15313A153
| issue date = 10/08/2015
| title = McGuire, Units 1 and 2 - Expedited Seismic Evaluation Process (ESEP) Report (CEUS Sites), Response to NRC Request for Information, Per 10CFR50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukus
| author name = Capps S D
| author affiliation = Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
| addressee name =
| addressee affiliation = NRC/Document Control Desk, NRC/NRR
| docket = 05000369, 05000370
| license number = NPF-009, NPF-017
| contact person =
| case reference number = MNS-15-077
| document type = Letter, Response to Request for Additional Information (RAI)
| page count = 3
| project =
| stage = Response to RAI
}}
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:S DUKESteven
: 0. CappsVice President ENERGYMcGuire Nuclear StationDuke EnergyMG01VP I112700 Hagers Ferry RoadHuntersville, NC 28078o: 980.875.4805 f: 980.875.4809 Steven.Capps@duke-energy.corn 10 CFR 50.4October 08, 2015Serial: MNS-1 5-077U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-001 ATTENTION:
Document Control DeskDuke Energy Carolinas, LLC (Duke Energy)McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2Docket Nos. 50-369 and 50-370Renewed License Nos. NPF-9 and NPF-17
 
==Subject:==
 
Expedited Seismic Evaluation Process (ESEP) Report (CEUS Sites), Responseto NRC Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of FederalRegulations 50.54(f)
Regarding Recommendations 2.1 of the Near-Term TaskForce Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident
 
==References:==
: 1. NRC Letter, Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of FederalRegulations 50.54(f)
Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi
: Accident, dated March 12,2012, ADAMS Accession No. ML12053A340
: 2. Duke Letter, Expedited Seismic Evaluation Process (ESEP) Report (CEUS Sites),Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of FederalRegulations 50.54(f)
Regarding Recommendations 2.1 of the Near-Term Task ForceReview of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi
: Accident, dated December 17, 2014,ADAMS Accession No. ML1 5005A0853. NRC Letter, Nuclear Regulatory Commission Plan for the Audit of Duke EnergyCarolinas, LLC and Duke Energy Progress, Inc. Interim Evaluations Associated withReevaluated Seismic Hazard Implementing Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1 -Seismic for: Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2; McGuire Nuclear Station,Units 1 and 2; and Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2 and 3, dated September 2, 2015,ADAMS Accession No. ML15226A185 US Nuclear Regulatory Commission October 08, 2015Page 2On March 12, 2012, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued Reference i to all powerreactor licensees and holders of construction permits in active or deferred status. Enclosure 1 ofReference 1 requested that licensees provide interim evaluations and actions taken or plannedto address the higher seismic hazard relative to the design basis, as appropriate, prior tocompletion of the risk evaluation.
Reference 2 provided the Expedited Seismic Evaluation Process (ESEP) Report for MNS Units 1 and 2.On September 15, 2015, an audit of the ESEP interim evaluations associated with thereevaluated seismic hazard for Catawba, McGuire and Oconee was held in Rockville, Maryland.
During the audit, the NRC requested that Duke Energy supplement the December 17, 2014,submittal (Reference
: 2) by revising Action #3 in Section 8.4, Table 8-1 of the ESEP reportdescribed as "Submit a letter to the NRC confirming implementation of the modifications associated with items 1 and 2 within 60 days following completion of ESEP activities for items 1and 2" from a planned action to a regulatory commitment.
This letter establishes Action #3 in Section 8.4, Table 8-1 of the ESEP Report as a newregulatory commitment.
Please direct any comments or questions regarding this submittal to George Murphy at(980) 875-5715.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed onOctober 08, 2015.Sincerely, Steven D. Capps US Nuclear Regulatory Commission October 08, 2015Page 3cc w/ Attachments:
C. HaneyAdministrator, Region IIU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Marquis One Tower245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200Atlanta, GA 30303-1257 J. ZeilerNRC Senior Resident Inspector McGuire Nuclear StationG. E. Miller, Project ManagerU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 11555 Rockville PikeMail Stop 0-8 G9ARockville, MD 20852-2738 S DUKESteven
: 0. CappsVice President ENERGYMcGuire Nuclear StationDuke EnergyMG01VP I112700 Hagers Ferry RoadHuntersville, NC 28078o: 980.875.4805 f: 980.875.4809 Steven.Capps@duke-energy.corn 10 CFR 50.4October 08, 2015Serial: MNS-1 5-077U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-001 ATTENTION:
Document Control DeskDuke Energy Carolinas, LLC (Duke Energy)McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2Docket Nos. 50-369 and 50-370Renewed License Nos. NPF-9 and NPF-17
 
==Subject:==
 
Expedited Seismic Evaluation Process (ESEP) Report (CEUS Sites), Responseto NRC Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of FederalRegulations 50.54(f)
Regarding Recommendations 2.1 of the Near-Term TaskForce Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident
 
==References:==
: 1. NRC Letter, Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of FederalRegulations 50.54(f)
Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi
: Accident, dated March 12,2012, ADAMS Accession No. ML12053A340
: 2. Duke Letter, Expedited Seismic Evaluation Process (ESEP) Report (CEUS Sites),Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of FederalRegulations 50.54(f)
Regarding Recommendations 2.1 of the Near-Term Task ForceReview of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi
: Accident, dated December 17, 2014,ADAMS Accession No. ML1 5005A0853. NRC Letter, Nuclear Regulatory Commission Plan for the Audit of Duke EnergyCarolinas, LLC and Duke Energy Progress, Inc. Interim Evaluations Associated withReevaluated Seismic Hazard Implementing Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1 -Seismic for: Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2; McGuire Nuclear Station,Units 1 and 2; and Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2 and 3, dated September 2, 2015,ADAMS Accession No. ML15226A185 US Nuclear Regulatory Commission October 08, 2015Page 2On March 12, 2012, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued Reference i to all powerreactor licensees and holders of construction permits in active or deferred status. Enclosure 1 ofReference 1 requested that licensees provide interim evaluations and actions taken or plannedto address the higher seismic hazard relative to the design basis, as appropriate, prior tocompletion of the risk evaluation.
Reference 2 provided the Expedited Seismic Evaluation Process (ESEP) Report for MNS Units 1 and 2.On September 15, 2015, an audit of the ESEP interim evaluations associated with thereevaluated seismic hazard for Catawba, McGuire and Oconee was held in Rockville, Maryland.
During the audit, the NRC requested that Duke Energy supplement the December 17, 2014,submittal (Reference
: 2) by revising Action #3 in Section 8.4, Table 8-1 of the ESEP reportdescribed as "Submit a letter to the NRC confirming implementation of the modifications associated with items 1 and 2 within 60 days following completion of ESEP activities for items 1and 2" from a planned action to a regulatory commitment.
This letter establishes Action #3 in Section 8.4, Table 8-1 of the ESEP Report as a newregulatory commitment.
Please direct any comments or questions regarding this submittal to George Murphy at(980) 875-5715.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed onOctober 08, 2015.Sincerely, Steven D. Capps US Nuclear Regulatory Commission October 08, 2015Page 3cc w/ Attachments:
C. HaneyAdministrator, Region IIU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Marquis One Tower245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200Atlanta, GA 30303-1257 J. ZeilerNRC Senior Resident Inspector McGuire Nuclear StationG. E. Miller, Project ManagerU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 11555 Rockville PikeMail Stop 0-8 G9ARockville, MD 20852-2738}}

Latest revision as of 07:14, 7 April 2019

Redirect to:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML15313A153&oldid=1417168"