ML062020123: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML062020123 | | number = ML062020123 | ||
| issue date = 03/02/2004 | | issue date = 03/02/2004 | ||
| title = E-mail from Blough to Vito, | | title = E-mail from Blough to Vito, PSEG Letter | ||
| author name = Blough A R | | author name = Blough A R | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-I/DNMS | | author affiliation = NRC/RGN-I/DNMS | ||
Revision as of 18:40, 10 February 2019
| ML062020123 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 03/02/2004 |
| From: | Blough A R Division of Nuclear Materials Safety I |
| To: | Vito D J Division of Nuclear Materials Safety I |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2005-0194 | |
| Download: ML062020123 (2) | |
Text
Dai io-Re: Fwd: PSEG letter Pagel 1 From: A. Randolph Blough F_ 3(To: David Vito Date: 3/2/04 11:25AM
Subject:
Re: Fwd: PSEG letter 3/18 is the very IikgJy date for the meeting>>> David Vito 03/02/04 07:25AM >>-SENSITIVE ALLEGATION INFORMATION
--PROTECT ACCORDINGLY
-Please see the attached questions from the alleger. I should probably get back to he~r today. Based on my knowledge so far, I am assuming: 1. All we have received so far is the faxed version of the PSEG 2/27/04 letter, and that when we do get the official version, it will not be in electronic form, and;2. We are not planning on sending PSEG an interim response in advance of the meeting.Please get back to me as soon as possible with the answers to these questions.
Thanks.CC: Gwm
~z'David Vito -Re: Fwd: PSEG letter 7 age From: Ernest Wilson 0 To: A. Randolph Blough; Anne Passarelli; Brian Holian; Daniel Orr; David Vito; Diane Screnci; Eileen Neff; George Malone; Gilbert Johnson; Glenn Meyer; Hubert J. Miller; James Wiggins;Jeffrey Teator; Karl Farrar; Marc Ferdas; Mel Gray; Neil Sheehan; Scott Barber; Theodore Wingfield; Tracy Walker I ýDate: 3/2/04 7:53AM
Subject:
Re: Fwd: PSEG letter 01 has nothing to add to Dave's assumptions.
>>> David Vito 9J/~02/04 07:25AM >>>>-SENSITIVE ALLEGATION INFORMATION
--PROTECT ACCORDINGLY
-Please see the attached questions from the alleger. I should probably get back to her today. Based on my knowledge so far, I am assuming: 1. All we have received so far is the faxed version of the PSEG 2/27/04 letter, and that when we do get the official version, it will not be in electronic form, and;2. We are not planning on sending PSEG an interim response in advance of the meeting.Please get back to me as soon as possible with the answers to these questions.
Thanks.CC: CC: Daniel Holody; Leanne Harrison; Sharon Johnson